Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West (0)

exotics4me (463) 07-19-08  11:06am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A site that offers very realistic lesbian sex
- Not for sure, but I had never seen these models. If I have, I didn't recognize them, so it definitely brings new amateur models
- Navigation is good, which is important since I don't know these models and had to sift through them to find the ones that interested me
- Movie quality is good enough at 640 high end, 2000 bitrate
- Pictures are high resolution and zipped, though see the cons
Cons: - To be blunt, there are more than a few not attractive models here. Will explain in Bottom Line
- I didn't get very good DL speeds, though it wasn't terrible about 100 kb/s lower than what I'm used to getting
- Sorry to those who like hairy women, it is a con to me, some of these girls look like they have Sasquatch in a leg headlock, major turn-off for me, but if you like that this is a pro
- Most of the picture sets didn't interest me, so having the high res, zips, wasn't really a factor. Relax, I'm going to explain in the BL
- Price seemed a little high at $25
Bottom Line: My annual "lets try a real amateur site" attempt. Ok, if you like only real amateurs this is a very good site. If you like hairy women, this is a good site. If you like glamour girls, this is not a good site.

I won't knock the quality since it is very good, navigation is very good and you can tell that a lot of hard work is put into this site.

On the good news, some of these girls are beautiful. You get a nice blend of body shapes and sizes and I really liked that about the site. The sex, whether b/g or g/g is very believable and let me repeat, there are some very pretty girls here. Especially if you like redheads, which I do.

Then there is the bad side. Some of these girls are unshaven. I'm not a shaven beaver freak, my favorite model is Eve Angel and she almost always has pubic hair.

Some of these girls are not very good looking either, not in an ugly way, but it is like some of them just rolled out of bed, no make-up, flat hair types. Let me put it this way, some of these women in my guess are real lesbians, not the lipstick kind either.

Having said that, that is just my preferences showing. I can applaud this site for staying true to their niche and if you are into very regular girls blended with the occasional knockout, you will like this site better than I did. Quality is fine all around too. Just not my cup of tea overall. So, I will recommend it for those who like the unshaven natural types, real lesbian fans, but can't recommend it for glam fans.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


messmer (137) A fair and detailed review, exotics4me, even though I gave the site a much higher rating. But that's where individual tastes come in and that's why I appreciate reviewers like you. You give all the pertinent details and will steer those who share your taste in a direction more suitable for them without knocking a site that's not quite your cup of tea. BTW, not sure if you will feel the same way I do, given our differences but while you are there download the g/g video (three parts) of Page and Rachelle (could be listed under Rachelle and Page). Rachelle's orgasm is the most realistic I have ever seen in all my porn travels. She's awkward, inexperienced with women, and so genuine and appealing that I marked the three segments: do not delete! :-)
07-19-08  03:56pm

Reply To Message


exotics4me (463) REPLY TO #1 - messmer :

Hey messmer,

Thanks, I had a similar review for the Abby Winters site last year. They're both really good sites, and I would hope that my review shows others that like glam porn, that they might not like this one, just like I would hope your review shows those that don't like glam porn, that is the site for them.

I will tell you a few of the girls I really liked on this site. I thought Pam, reddish/blonde hair was really cute, nice body too. Luna has a great body. Loved Lili and her red hair and freckles. Bridgette reminds me of Erica Campbell and my two favorites were Fluer and Lola. Those girls really caught my attention, especially Lola.

The thing that bothered me though, as much as I dislike lots of pubic hair, if the girl is pretty enough, I can deal with it, but hairy armpits are something that I've never been around, ever. That almost goes into too shocking for me. And several of the g/g sets had girls with hairy armpits.

Not that I think there is anything wrong with it, but it just doesn't fit my ideal of a fantasy woman. I will check that one out that you mentioned, made a notepad note here.

I remember talking to Snowdude last year about the areas we were raised in, and I was raised just outside of Los Angeles, beaches, blondes, bikinis everywhere I looked. So, I do like "regular" girls as well, as a contrast to my raising. One of my strongest fetishes is a woman in a long skirt with a tight sweater on, since I never saw women like that growing up. So, I can appreciate this site for the niche it is and as mentioned in the review, I really do applaud them for sticking to it.

Thanks for the tip on the Rachelle and Page videos and the reply. Will let you know how I liked them.

07-19-08  09:04pm

Reply To Message


messmer (137) REPLY TO #2 - exotics4me :

exotics4me wrote:

"Thanks, I had a similar review for the Abby Winters site last year. They're both really good sites, and I would hope that my review shows others that like glam porn, that they might not like this one, just like I would hope your review shows those that don't like glam porn, that is the site for them."

messmer's reply:

Yep, that's why I believe a very short review of any site is next to useless. Because every user's taste is so different, (I love hair and have just resubscribed to ATK Natural and Hairy) it is important to give as many details as possible about the contents of a given site.

Quality is very important but the contents are even more so because you might find yourself stuck with a site for a month (or three) that you find terribly boring. Happened to me a few times, Twisty's and ATK Galleria being two recent examples. They are quality sites, most people love them but they couldn't have been farther from what I was looking for. :-) So thanks again for making it so clear to folks about what to expect. Hope new reviewers will read and follow your lead.

07-20-08  09:01am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.