Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Solo Interviews

Solo Interviews (0)

Active
51
DivBZero (13) 03-13-07  02:09pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Navigation is OK, Video quality passable (only the later sets) and presentatable young ladies, well dressed in good settings.
Cons: This site is having a complete and utter giraffe (laugh at our expense) when they say "HIGH QUALITY PICS" on the inside and "Hi-Res Quality Pics" on the tour. The best I saw clocks in at 700 x 1,050 pixels, and this is only available in the latest sets. The pictures appear to be taken on an Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT. which surely must cost less than a models fee.

Videos reported to be 621MB in size, were actually 90MB.
Bottom Line: I checked through the family of sites offered in the one months membership - the quality is consistently poor across all.

I suggest that one steers away from these sites until they have learnt to present their wares in a manner consistent with their descriptions.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

roseman (253) Thanks for the info
03-13-07  02:45pm

Reply To Message

2

uscue (39) I haven't checked solo interviews yet, but their network sites OyeLoca and InnocentHigh do indeed have high quality pics. Or rather, just to be safe, i'll say they are smaller in size (700x1050) but high quality regarding how they look. They don't look anything like vidcaps or amateur-ish. They look like any other sites High-Res pics but smaller in size. Video quality wasn't DVD quality like some great sites but wasn't worse than any other regular site and I never questioned it until reading the review.

I agree that this site is not as good as the other sites in the network, but does it really deserve a 51? Is that based just on the pics (it is mainly a video site)? I'd think, based on the things you pointed out that they did wrong, that the site would be in the 70's, described as: Average, some things done right, some things done wrong or 60's: does more wrong than right, low recommendation.

51 just seems low for a site costing 17.84 a month with 4 other sites included (over 100 vids all together), has a score of 78 by TBP and five 80's out of seven other sites reviews, no DRM or download limit (not anymore). Even a site with vidcaps only would be at least Average with all those added at that price, but this site DOES have actual higher quality pics, just not as high (pixels) as others which you wouldn't notice unless you used a program that showed pixels like photoshop or irfanview.

03-13-07  10:35pm

Reply To Message

3

DivBZero (13) REPLY TO #2 - uscue :

Hi there,

You've made a really good critique of my review! I'm so pleased you've took the trouble to reply.

On balance the 51 score is overly harsh on my part, and certainly driven by two factors:

a) Description not matching content.
b) Difficulties in cancelling subscriptions (in T&Cs it points at ccbill when in fact they use Paycom, ccbill is mentioned but this option wasn't available at sign-up).

So I wasn't best disposed as I wrote the review. It does however ask the question, what is hi-resolution? and if pixels are not quoted on the tour then their version of 'full' resolution should be available to sample.

I did enjoy the poses and content of this site.

thanks again ...

Double regards


DivBZero

03-18-07  03:49pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.