Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit K Package Pass

K Package Pass (0)

bunnypu (0) 04-26-08  02:30pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Where are the advertised models?

Two major complaints about this site; Some advertised content is not available in the Member's Area and a serious mistake in branding some small-boobed, blonde as Kyla Cole! Tried to contact the Webmaster but no reply.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (6)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Drooler (220) The sites from this company are plagued with problems such as you describe. Just read the comments and reviews -- but skip the reviews that are obviously written by shills; there are several of those.

Frankly, I think those shill reviews should be wiped off of PornUsers with a strong industrial cleaning agent. They're an eyesore and they don't belong here.

04-26-08  02:43pm

Reply To Message

2

jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :

Yes... Like the great Markus:

TRUST USER? YES (0), NO (17)

This guy is the worst. He shills all these sites, and look at the score he gives the competition! LOL

http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1257

04-27-08  02:52am

Reply To Message

3

Drooler (220) REPLY TO #2 - jd1961 :

Yes, it was a rather sickening experience, exchanging e-mails with this guy who's pretending not to be a representative of the company but just an ordinary user. I played along; wanted to see how well he could play the role without dropping little "tells" in his messages.

Lying tends to put people under stress because they have to keep covering their tracks, and the stress makes them vulnerable to slip ups. But his tracks were all over the place! LOL.

I must say, it was one of those times when the trust ratings really made a big difference.

Enjoy your crow, Markus.

04-27-08  04:45am

Reply To Message

4

jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #3 - Drooler :

But if you dig deep, you'll see that he suckered the poor webmaster from Twistys into a long argument over him giving Twistys (2 hotlinks!) a 57 score. I guess I didn't notice it at the time, or I would have clued the Twistys (there's 3) webmaster to this shill.
You may add your reply here:

http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3118

04-27-08  05:03am

Reply To Message

5

Denner (233) If not scam - it's close, very close!
A lot of PUs - included this one - has warned about this site/pass in the past.
Nothing is exclusive here and most preview is, yes - totally scam. The content is at best worthless.
The reactions from a lot of PUs should NOW make TBP consider the score of 82,0.
That score is like giving this pass a seal of approval.
BTW, bunnypu - give it a shot with a review here! It'll be welcome.

04-27-08  06:57am

Reply To Message

6

Denner (233) REPLY TO #2 - jd1961 :

Either this guy is not for real (in the head) or some kind of "undercover agent for shitty sites".
Well, the trust score puts it in perspective - still it's waste of our time to have a PU like that....

04-27-08  07:13am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.