Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls (2)

turboshaft (24) 04-01-08  12:35pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Tons of content, all archived
+ Hot young models, most are unknowns
+ Some good videos, with masturbation, anal, toys, including some in HD
+ Pretty easy and simple navigation
+ Selected photos are available in gigantic sizes (2000 x 3000!)
Cons: - Normal photos could be a lot bigger and clearer
- Content can get repitive and boring, sometimes pretty softcore, even for a girl-only site
- Downloads could be faster
- Too much clothed and public nudity scenes
- Not every model has videos
- Better content descriptions needed for the model listings (it's not clear whether something is in a video or photo)
Bottom Line: First off, this is a huge site - lots of exclusive content, available to all users. Unfortunately, all this content was not created equal. A model could be doing some big insertions in a scene, but half the photos will just be of her undressing, or doing some stupid public nudity, and this gets frustrating very fast. The vast majority of these women are very attractive; it just takes too long to see them nude. The photos themselves are good, but really way too small (1100 x 800 max). There are huge photos available in a big pics section, but they are only available in zip packs, so you have to DL a whole scene (some 100mb+, a slow DL on this site) just to get a few good ones.

This site gets high marks for the sheer amount of content available, the beauty of its models, and its videos, but they seem to fail to reach the full potential of it all by not offering bigger size normal pics and more nudity (it is a porn site after all). Fortunately, navigating and finding the goods is quick and easy, though they are not always clear what is what on the model listing pages (whether something is in a video or photo), and some stuff I stumbled upon by accident, but it's not mentioned (a few pissing photos, for example). Still, this is not a hardcore site, so if you looking for rough hard content with guys, then this isnít the place.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Denner (235) Fine review!
Great to see a new fellow PU with a review like this.
I agree entirely on this kind of points - the 90 and more is way too high.
Especially the quality of videos - technical and editorial - lacks a lot.

04-02-08  08:49am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) I definitely agree with you about the photo sizes. I don't understand why some sites are still stuck in the "hey, wow, these are some really BIG pics, y'all, which makes them special, so we have to create some scarcity for them" mindset. It's what turns me off to Photo Dromm and Xisty as well, 'cause they do the same thing.

There are some fine pics at FTV that I'd love to have in full size, but probably never will. And on their site, the "huge" pics area can be kind of tough to keep track of. Plus, you don't even know what pics you're going to get unless you download first. I think a lot of bandwidth gets wasted because of that.

Great review, by the way! It makes the right points on both the pro's and the con's. I don't understand why it gets such raves from some other people. Femjoy and MetArt are a lot better, I think.

04-03-08  02:36pm

Reply To Message


BostonPJR (Disabled) Considering I gave it a much higher review I still do have to agree with your frustration of some of the pointless "waiting for crap to happen already" segments of the video. I may have reviewed the site with stars in my eyes, but I still do love it. But thanks for your honest review. Gave me something to consider.
07-26-08  11:11am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.