Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Regan Reese

Regan Reese (0)

SnowDude (214) 02-24-07  02:08pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (0)

Looking for Interaction

I was excited when I saw this site go up a week or so ago since I am always looking for girls' individual sites that have short hair (if you happen to know any PLEASE let me know!). So, I emailed Regan (her email is provided on the site) and really hoped to hear back, but it's been over a week and nothing. :( Hopefully it's just an oversight and/or she'll still write me back, but it's not a good first sign about a strong level of interaction. She looks pretty hot though! :)

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (10)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date


roseman (253) yeah, she is very hot ... pitty that she didn't reply to your message, lots of sites have the same problem though.
02-24-07  02:26pm

Reply To Message


SnowDude (214) REPLY TO #1 - roseman :

Thanks roseman! It is a new site, so perhaps I should give her the benefit of the doubt and try again. It is a shame that it's a common issue and I'm sure on some sites it's a matter of volume. However, I get the impression at a lot of sites that it's a matter of being a jerk. ;) BTW, know any nice individual sites where the girl has short hair? Sorry to ask, but I like to make sure I've tapped every resource! LOL
02-24-07  02:42pm

Reply To Message


roseman (253) REPLY TO #2 - SnowDude :

lol Dude. Just do a little research and you will find some, I don't have any favourite site of an individual model with short hair as I am not so interesting in such content :P
02-24-07  03:20pm

Reply To Message


SnowDude (214) REPLY TO #3 - roseman :

You have no idea how scarce they actually are and I've been looking for years, so I would know! Not that I'm bitter or anything. ;)
02-24-07  04:10pm

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #2 - SnowDude :

Not as an excuse, but by way of offering another perspective from someone who's watched the industry from the other side of the fence ...

I find the amount of interaction a model is willing to do varies quite a bit. If they promise interaction but don't deliver, that's one thing. However, unless they hype up interaction, I think it may be considered a bonus. In other words, imo it's unfair to say every model of every site should have lots of interaction with the users ... even though we might wish they would.

The reason some don't participate will vary from case to case. Odd as it may sound, some are genuinely worried about fans stalking them. Others might do the modeling but have little else to do with the site. Of course there are others who know the value of interaction with their members and welcome it.

Again, I have no personal knowledge in the case of *this* site. I bring this up only as an alternative POV. Just a way of saying it might not be accurate to automatically assume that models who don't willingly communicate with members are jerks.

02-24-07  06:44pm

Reply To Message


SnowDude (214) REPLY TO #5 - Khan :

Thanks for the POV Khan and I agree with everything you said. I'm sure the example I mentioned was isolated and I think most webmistresses that didn't have any interaction would just say so when asked rather than calling me a pervert. And in most cases I would be looking for sites that specifically said interaction was part of the deal. In the case of Regan Reese, the main page gives her direct email address and seems to indicate that questions are welcome.

I think my problem is that I don't get as excited about pics or videos unless I have some level of interaction with the individual running the site even if it's very minimal (which it usually is). One girl's website I'm on refers to true interaction on adult sites as "personality porn" but ackowledges that it's pretty rare. That also makes my fetish for short haired girls pretty difficult because by the time I find pics of one they've already changed their hair.

Well, that was long winded. Thanks for the reply Khan! :)

02-24-07  07:02pm

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #6 - SnowDude :

Certainly I would never condone a model or webmaster degrading paying members. Not only is it bad business, it's just downright rude.

I'd also fully agree that sites that do provide plenty of interaction will always have an edge over those that don't ... and rightfully so. It really adds a depth to the site that no amount of photos or vids can accomplish.

But isn't that one of the real benefits of PornUsers? Now users won't have to depend on the hype offered on tour pages but rather can get the straight scoop from those that have actually been members. If interaction is an important factor then you'll have a good idea going in how much they can expect.

Anyhoo .. wasn't trying to sidetrack your comments, just offering another POV.

02-24-07  07:28pm

Reply To Message


SnowDude (214) REPLY TO #7 - Khan :

No, you didn't sidetrack my comments at all! I just didn't want you to think I was whinning, "Poor little old me!" ;) And I agree knowing other users experiences is one reason why PU is a such great site, while you responding with thoughtful comments is another! I really appreciate it. :)
02-24-07  07:41pm

Reply To Message


roseman (253) I agree with what Khan said, but I do believe that having personal interaction via e-mails or yahoo messenger, for example, with site members shows that you trully care about the site that you have (if you are a model or a webmaster) and not only about member's money and it is more professional. From the other hand, lots of member's could stalk or flood sites models or some models may do not care about having interaction with site's members e.t.c, that is totally logical and does not show that they are not professionals or something. I believe that everyone has his/her preferences, which must be considered when joining an adult site on which MUST be clearly shown what kind of services will and can be provider to members.
02-25-07  07:10am

Reply To Message


SnowDude (214) REPLY TO #9 - roseman :

Very true and I agree. As Khan said, interaction really is a bonus and as you said can indicate a webmaster/model really cares. That isn't to say that sites without interaction aren't good, but they are the type that I look for most times. In this case, it's a new site and under contact gives a direct email so I thought I'd give it a whirl. I never thought my simple comment would generate so much buzz, but that's why this site is pretty damn cool.:)
02-25-07  08:47am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.