Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Cougars In Heat

Cougars In Heat (0)

malikstarks (8) 03-15-08  02:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (0)

No Network Acess Hurts This Site

I would consider this site to be a slightly better version of Naughty America's MyFriendsHotmom, or SeducedbyaCougar (clearly this is who they are trying to compete with). The video quality may be slightly better (maybe), but most of all their still photos are excellent (from having seen samples).

However I'm not quite sure how to justify this site charging more per month than Naughty America, when the size of it's content DWARFS that of NA, and they offer no other bona fide sites.

I guess the fact that they are touting HD vids is their rationale, I just don't think it's good enough. Too bad cause I would hate to see this site go down, it has some potential.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (2)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Toadsith (48) Did you mean Naughty America's quantity of content is more than Cougars In Heat? Because you said the opposite - which to me would be all the reason in the world to charge more. As per my review I'm sure you know that I'm quite fond of Cougars In Heat. Granted there are other sites with more content per dollar, but this site delivers what it promises and messes about with different scenarios and models to keep the content fresh and interesting while staying within their niche. That is a tough feat to pull off.

I recently reviewed All Internal which is a very comparable site as it doesn't grant you access to its network of sites, is a quite specific niche and for all intents and purposes is a better site - especially technology wise (wonderful search engine, review system, et cetera). However that site gets a bit boring after awhile. As Cougars In Heat continues to grow and if they add a search engine and such - I could see rating it higher than All Internal in the future because it changes its scenarios and adds a bit of fantasy to the porn.

All in all, I honestly believe their price is justified and a good site shouldn't be put down for charging premium price when they provide premium, exclusive content.

03-17-08  02:05pm

Reply To Message

2

malikstarks (8) REPLY TO #1 - Toadsith :

I appreciate your reasoned response. Yes, I meant that NA has more content that CougarsinHeat (CIH). Also remember that in the comment I did agree with you that the content on CIH is slightly better (more and better pics, very slightly higher vid quality etc.). However I still don't think these differences are significant enough to justify the price. Remember this site charges MORE than NA does for a pretty massive network. The only way it could offset that imo was if it was bringing a particular niche to the table that is unique, or hard to find, but the premise of the site is pretty much the same as NA, many of the models are also the same.

I had no problem at all with your review though, as a standalone sight it more than holds it's own, and many of your points are justifiable.

03-19-08  11:28pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.