Comment Replies (5)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Didier (Disabled)
|
Whoever the author of this comment really is, the information about the volume of the content is wildly exaggerated. Like Oswald (see his comment posted on 03.02.08), I too recently joined this site, but was very disappointed - to say the least. As Oswald wrote:
"Plus it's downright cheating when they tell you that the videos are 'much better quality' than the free trailers. They just ain't: WMV 320 x 240 plus minus 300 kbps for the trailers, and WMV 320 x 240 plus minus 500 kbps for the clips. So much for the 'much better quality' promised(!)"
I don't know how to check videos for kbps etc., but it is true that the videos for members look like the trailers and are of the same small size.
I wrote to the webmaster three times to complain about the false promises made about the quality of the video clips, but I never got any answer. I wondered why. I don't anymore. It's really too bad that there are people like that in the business.
|
03-16-08 01:23am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
trace (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Didier :
So you don't know how to check the bitrate of a movie so you cannot say if they are better or not. When you say they are the same as the trailers that is totally not the case. The trailers are about 45 seconds long and around 300kps, the movies inside are nothing like that.
Are you saying that I exaggerated?, I have just been and checked and there are 90 clips and they are all 5 minutes or more and there are 40 pic sets with about 40 plus pics per set, although some much much more than that. Like I said, yes. there are movies at 320x240 but you also seem to have missed the 580x436 movies at over 1000kps. Also the clips at 320x240 are such good quality I simply increase the size to 200% and I have a good quality movie at 640x480.
I have written to support once or twice and have never had a problem getting a reply, I don't send an e-mail and expect a reply right away.
Its interesting to see that you have made only one reply as has crookbuster1, this makes me wonder if this is just "Oswald" using a different login or just some of his mates. I don't know what your motives are but there must be a reason for these lies.
|
03-17-08 03:29am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Oswald (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - trace :
"Its interesting to see that you have made only one reply as crookbuster1, this makes me wonder if this is just 'Oswald' using a different login or just some of his mates."
From Oswald:
Because I felt downright cheated by glovelove.net, I was happy to find this forum where I could voice my opinion and warn others about the site's poor quality, lack of promises kept and disregard for its paying members (and a few other users apparently share that opinion about the site).
I found "trace"'s comment "A HAPPY COSTUMER" and his reply to my comment "FRANKLY A WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY" a bit surprising, both in its timing and its substance, and therefore decided to post a reply to "A HAPPY COSTUMER".
Now I find myself accused of being a liar, of being the probable owner of a competing site and of adopting several aliases in order to post more comments and replies that I am entitled to - By somebody who obviously disregards the Terms & Conditions of pornusers.com ("...even when you disagree you should conduct yourself as a responsible adult and refrain from personal attacks and put-downs of fellow users.")
I find "trace"'s accusations offensive towards me personally and, quite frankly, so aggressive in their efforts to defend glovelove.net, that I cannot help asking myself who "trace" really is, since he even seems to be in a position to offer to repay me my membership fee...
A "dialogue" of that nature is not my style at all, so I refuse to participate any further. In fact, before considering spending money on glovelove.net I'm sure that users - on the basis of the remarks posted so far - can decide for themselves whom they find to be the more trustworthy.
|
03-18-08 03:43am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Didier (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - trace :
I registered to make a reply consistent with my experience of Glovelove, which charged me more than 20 euros for a very limited number of short and poor-quality video clips, and whose webmaster never replied to me emails. I did not register to get insulted.
In his eagerness to promote the site the user calling himself 'trace' does not refrain from personal attacks in clear violation of the 'Reply Rules', but nothing has been done to stop him.
That is why I will now cancel my registration.
|
03-19-08 11:45pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Pinball (0)
|
I just joined to make a few remarks about Glovelove - cause I don't understand a word of trace's Comment.
My experience is exactly that of Oswald, except for 580x436 clip(s). I found 1 (o-n-e)!
It's also true (read Didier) that they don't answer you emails.
One thing strikes me. Why hasn't the webmaster shown up here to comment?
|
03-21-08 07:28am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|
