Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit All Internal

All Internal (0)

Active
90
Toadsith (48) 03-06-08  12:36am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (48), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * 1080p WMV HD Video (1920x1080 at 7997kbps) - Average Video Length 30~40 Minutes
* Flash Based Streaming / MPEG Partial Section Videos
* Screenshots & Video Preview for Every Video
* Matching High Res Photosets (1000x1500) Downloadable as Zip File
* 234 Videos and 211 Professional Models
* User Ratings & Reviews for Models & Scenes
* Updates One Video & Photoset Per Week
* Download Manager Friendly (Up to 10 Streams)
* Wonderful Search Engine by Actions (Sort by Date, Rating & HD) and Cross Site Indexing (For if you are a member of one of their other sites)
* Favorites Section
* Selection of DP, Anal, Vaginal Sex (With Some Lesbian Action) with Many Legendary Creampies
Cons: * Slow Download Speed (300kbps)
* Can Hear the Director’s Instructions throughout the Video
* Older Videos Lower Res. (512x384)
* Watermark on Video and Photos
* HD Video Somewhat Fuzzy & Smooth, Not Crisp
* Content Can Become Repetitive
Bottom Line: I would never guess that I would find any quality porn repetitive – sadly All Internal has become that way. The production qualities and direction are so consistent that only truly stand-out models can keep you interested after looking through the over 230 videos. Fortunately, there are some.

The formula the site runs on is one or two models, who strip, tease, suck and then screw for the camera. Always finish with a creampie (anal or vaginal, single or multiple) and sometimes another model will perform an eat-out. Take some setup photos and that is the package. The site now offers 1080p HD video – unfortunately whatever camera they use is at the limits of its resolution so the picture is a bit fuzzy. Despite this minor technical limitation, the video is very well lit and the camera angles are good, close-ups and distance.

Liking the videography – and most of the models are quite attractive – then what is the problem? Granted the Director instructing the models during the video can be a problem, and some models truly phone it in with fake moans – but the root of it is, in their effort to homogenize the content to a consistent level of perfection means they have lost the benefits of experimentation. Sure an experiment may fail, but it will always be interesting. Despite many models, they use few sets and few clothing – and the action formula rarely changes – this simply excellent just begins to blend together.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

PerfectGonzo (12)
Webmaster
I'd like to address the download speed issue. We've recently implemented global mirrored servers for the 1080p HD downloads. This means that the movies will be coming from locations geographically close to the member. The download speed should fully max out the connection. The 'non-HD' videos are not on this system yet, but they should be starting May.

For example: a member with 5Mbps DSL should be able to get a full 5Mbps (625KB/s) steady for the entire download.

As far as the blurryness, it's 30fps high motion, thus quite difficult to be kept sharp in non-Hollywood grade cameras. I suggested watching the HD videos at a farther distance than where you would normally watch standard definition videos.

03-06-08  06:10am

Reply To Message

2

Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #1 - PerfectGonzo :

I'm glad to hear your improving the download speeds - they aren't exceptionally slow, but for a site dedicated to perfection in every form - they were notable. For my ISP, download speeds in excess of 1MB/s is not uncommon - I've seen as high as 3MB/s - but I generally only receive 200~300KB/s via your servers. As always with the download speed estimates YMMV (Your Mileage May Vary) - I post it because other users inevitably ask it - but with location and ISP differences it isn't always the most reliable estimate for all. Frankly, it is a very good sign that it is the primary fault I could come up with.

On the other hand, I do think it is important that people know they can't freeze frame the video and get a picture perfect shot in 1920x1080 resolution - I understand that Hollywood grade camera's are outrageously expensive, so as exceptional as the video is, it isn't Blu-Ray. I personally would recommend most users skip the HD file and go for the 960x540 file as most users don't have monitors with a high enough resolution for the HD, and the 960 file will consequently look sharper, be easier to download and easier on the rig. I would have included that in the review, but as usual I ran out of space.

I did forget to mention that you guys do have a wonderful support team that responded to an inquiry of mine within hours - that is always commendable. You have a wonderful site - I just wish you would experiment a bit with the content a bit more, get outside your safety zone and see what happens. As it is, it is a strange thing - I feel I can't rate it poorly at all - the content is exactly what it professes to be - but in essence, that is its own downfall. All of the mystery is gone and we know what will happen from the moment we press play. I'm not saying pornographic films need to have a deviously complex plot line, but leaving any variability in a scene to need to be an act-of-god, that makes for a bit of a sameness to it all. Perhaps I'm jaded or just peculiar, but I felt it necessary to address the issue.

Cheers!

03-06-08  07:56am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.