Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit White Ghetto

White Ghetto (0)

Toadsith (48) 03-05-08  11:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (47), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * DVD-Quality WMV Video (720x528 at 2148kbps)
* 140 Full-Length DVDs (Video Available Per Scene)
* Average Video Length 20~30 Minutes
* No DRM
* Streaming WMV Video
* Screenshots of Every Video
* All Content Categorized By Action, Model, Model-Type, Series, and Title
* Searchable Using Gamma VIP parent site
* 14 Included Bonus Sites
* Updates Approx. 1 DVD per Week (One Scene Every Two Days)
* Shows DVD Cover Art for Every Movie
Cons: * Slow Downloads (270kbps)
* Trouble with Some Download Managers
* Shaky Camera Work and Lens Vignetting
* Harsh Lighting
* Many Less-Than-Attractive Models
* Watermark on Videos
* No Photos
Bottom Line: White Ghetto treads the border of erotic and grotesque. Unfortunately for me it often falls into the latter; which is really saying something.

As a catalogue of White Ghetto Productions’ DVDs – the site houses three main niches: Cream Pies, Transsexuals, and Squirting. Each are divided into numerous sub-niches – from standards like MILF and Asian to fetishes like BBW and Hairy. The site is easy to navigate with its category system and is searchable via the Gamma VIP parent site.

While it doesn’t give you photos – you get plenty of full-length DVDs (split by scene) with DVD-Quality video. Screenshots or the streaming option makes previewing each video relatively easy.

The problem for me is the content itself. The models are extremely variable – some are lovely, a great many are average at best. And the lighting and camera work don’t help – bright direct light highlights every flaw and the camera bounces around, never steady and often finding unfortunate angles.

I feel as though they push for an unrefined look, and it works – at times I wonder that they found the record button at all. The general idea behind their content choices isn’t flawed – it is quite simply the final product that falls short of its potential in every way for me. So you have a fine site with simply unattractive content – fear not though, their sister sites fair much better.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Pornviewer (5) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Personally I like models that are less than perfect. I think the airbrushed, surgically enhanced, perfect lighting and heavily made-up models look artificial. I like variety in looks, average is okay if the sex is hot. Some sex scenes are burning hot with okay looking woman because you can tell they are into the sex and there organisms are not faked.

BTW there are many beautiful women on the Rocco Siffredi site which is now included.

Again, I’m not saying you are wrong in your opinion. I am just offering a different perspective.

12-27-08  04:47pm

Reply To Message


Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #1 - Pornviewer :

If you follow my reviews and my commentary in the forums you'll note that I am in fact a strong proponent of natural women - no makeup, minimal or no airbrushing and definitely not enhanced by surgery. Though I would say perfect However, perfect lighting should be sought at all times, otherwise the craftsmen are simply not taking interest in their craft. Perfect lighting doesn't necessarily mean a flood light though. I do not find much appeal in average or even below average looking women unless they have some seriously impressive talents. White Ghetto seemed to be making a point of choosing unattractive women - I'll even go so far as to say I was being a little overly nice in my description of the models on that site.
12-28-08  09:18pm

Reply To Message


Pornviewer (5) REPLY TO #2 - Toadsith :

Thanks for your response. I think we have to agree to disagree. I found a number of very attractive women in White Ghetto, particularly the Squirt on Me POV series which I thought were very hot as the women were very much into the sex. Not every single woman was beautiful and in fact one of the girls who I thought was the hottest was in fact below average on the looks scale. But her repeated organism and enthusiasm more than made up the looks. The sets are very average and looked like rented a motel room which was fine with me. Somehow I find the sex and "perfect lighting" in the multimillion dollars homes a little too pretentious. I can imagine the “cut”, “cut”, “cut” going on behind the scenes while the models are touched up and the lightening just right.

Now for me, when I think of having sex with a woman, the lightening is subdued, candles perhaps. The brighter the light does provide more definition in the subject, less light offers a softer touch. But I agree with you, White Ghetto is not about high production values or high on photographic details. The set is often minimalist, background details are often ignored.

But bottom line for me, the sex is hot. I like the “girl next door” look. The models are typically amateur or pro/amateur.

12-29-08  09:57am

Reply To Message


Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #3 - Pornviewer :

Cool, well if you can, please do post a review, more reviews the merrier and all that :-)


12-29-08  10:06am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.