Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Erotic Beauty

Erotic Beauty (0)

jd1961 (95) 12-03-07  03:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Beautiful High-Res Photography
- Zip Files
- Hi-Res Video
- Very Attractive Models
- Webcam - Decent Price (Nowadays)
Cons: - Frankly, A Money Grab
- Old Met-Art Sets Snuck In
- Few Videos
- The Losers Who Chat With The Webcam Girls!
- Model Reference All Messed Up
Bottom Line: I'm a member in both Met sites, and I think what they do is remove some sets from the Mother site and include them here. That's not to say that Models doesn't have it's own material, it does. And it's great Met material. But this site is a redundancy. Met-Money it should be called. It's less expensive than the Mother site, so you may just want to join this, but they have very few videos (30 as of this review) and haven't updated since July of last year. The newer vids are 720x580. The photos are typical Met style, hi-res and high quality, updated daily. Over 4000px for the latest, downloadable in zips of 2 sizes. The girls are mostly very pretty, the photography 1st class. But when you click the model info link, you may get 7 different models by the name of Katya, and if you vote pretty Katya a "10", plain Katya gets a "10" also! In the Mother site, they alphabetize the Katyas! This site also has a webcam, if you're into that, and it is high quality. I can't stand the guys who chat there. One guy asked a model if she liked older men, and she wrote a big red NO! LOL! I will review the Mother site later, but I wish they came up with a better idea for a 2nd money grab site. Like Met-Hardcore would have been a better idea. Or maybe one day they will open Met-Classic, with all those Lolita sets they have long ago pulled from the Mother site...maybe not! Join one or the other unless you are obsessed with the Met-Empire.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


lk2fireone (196) I believe the reason met-art removed some "Lolita" sets was for legal reasons.
The main photographer for met-art in its early days was Grigori Galitsin. He also provided pictures to Domai.
Later, Galitsin worked with Petter Hegre to set up an erotic website, and then Galitsin set up his own erotic websites.
Galtsin has had legal problems in recent years. In 2006 Galitsin was put in jail in Russia for his erotic photography.
His wife was also arrested and put in jail in 2006, released, then put in jail again. His wife was the model named Valentina at met-art and named Val at Domai.
Her photosets have all been pulled at met-art and Domai.
As far as I know, Galitsin is still in jail in Russia.

11-14-08  02:48pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.