Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Douggie (8)  

Feedback:   All (33)  |   Reviews (11)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (20)

Other:   Replies Received (22)  |   Trust Ratings (11)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-11 of 11  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit San Diego Latinas

San Diego Latinas
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 3 day trial
AWESOME solo videos (the only thing I surf for)
Several additional sites included, but mainly with the same content.
Cons: Trial is still on (3day) and Im outta downloads.
They need to desparately step up the solo content...it would be on its way to being a powerhouse.
How hard is it to find a hot chick a week?
Bottom Line: Wahoooo!
This is going to be a full text review. First, Im only interested in solo video. To date, I felt the best overall solo video was chantell from Matts models.
But man, Some of the girls from Sandiegolatinas are explosive! Ive been preaching to some sites out there on their solo video content for YEARS.
Some are comming around.
Keep up with fresh faces...keep up the work with the magic wand and maybe introduce the pocket ricket to the ones that cant handle the wand....I think youll be GIANT!

05-27-10  05:09pm

Replies (5)
Rating
2
Visit I Feel Myself

I Feel Myself
(0)

55.0
No Review.
03-17-09  02:09pm

Review
3
Visit CD Girls

CD Girls
(0)

64.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: ** They have a ton of resourses.
** A lot of nice look women.
** Nice looking site
** stay in contact with previous members
** a lot to offer
Cons: ** Terrible video work
** Solo content needs a lot of help
** Too complicated viewing
Bottom Line: CD girls was one of the first professional sites I joined. HEHE that was in my younger days....I was so into it I traced there IP and talked with there software guy for sometime....he was shocked. I discontinued then joined again...then dropped and joined again...and finally dropped.
The time before the last I actually spoke with the guy in charge and we talked about there video work. HE agreed they needed a lot of help and was looking for a new video person....it never happend and the last time I joined heard the familiar british accent in the back ground.

Well for one thing I know they allocate too much for what is really needed.
**Seems like they use 3-4 video cameras when all they need is one.
** Too many side shots
** too many out of focus shots
** too many drifting shots

I guess it could be the fault of the person doing the mixing of the video they get.

I know I could take one camera and get 80% better video then what they get with 3 or 4.
Its so disappointing to see these nice looking girls either doing there premiere video or possibly there only. Left to the hands of people that may have shot a lot of video but shot it all the same....WRONG!

Well, I had an old hd I dl'd a lot of video from cd girls. But deleted most of it. Dont get me wrong....sometimes there is a fluke and they do get it partly right and it happens to make a decent solo video. But for the most part....its nothing different then you can find anywhere else on the net.

07-18-07  02:45pm

Replies (2)
Review
4
Visit The Female Orgasm

The Female Orgasm
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: * Exclusive content
* Easy Navagation
* Provides a Niche
* has forum to talk with site operators
* comming along...slowly
* they lower there monthly fee if you try to cancell
Cons: * updates are very slow
* Expensive (but pretty much the norm)
* small site (one website/software person, one video guy)
Bottom Line: Although I wish nothing but good things for the fellow. I have belonged off and on to the site since its conception. The site needs to really concentrate on updates. As it is now you may get a part of an update today...then wait days or even weeks to see the rest of the video. And thats it....nothing more.
They are trying different things. But nothing that will really make the site a true success.

I guess what Im trying to say is this:
I realize its hard to find women to do a specific niche like this. But they are out there. It has been suggested that they need to contract out some work. I suggested paul from paulmarkhamteens. We'll see how that works out.

Thats there one and only problem...updates. What man wouldnt want to see some cute girl masturbating til her snatch starts twitchin? Get the girls in and he could be a monster on the web.

06-14-07  05:25pm

Replies (0)
Review
5
Visit 18 Eighteen

18 Eighteen
(0)

68.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: *Exclusive girls
*Trial join
*pretty girls
* A euro site that actually has vibrators with batteries!
HUM
Cons: Hate to be negative but......

*Very Very limited video
*Formats to finding videos are crappy
*Very limited updates
*A lot of video unable to play (corruption error or weird format that cautions people when they try to install).
* There boasts about how often they update is B.S.
Bottom Line: My postings are about video only......and mainly solo female video....I dont look at pictures.

I belong to thefemaleorgasm.com. I frequesnt there forum and there are several running posts about random sites. I told them I would check this one out.....ppppffffttt I have been here before. There homepage threw me off for some reason.

Its been quite a while (I would say a couple of years) since I was last there. There wastn too much more being offered. I think they mainly update there photo section which is pretty common. Very limited video. Fewer yet videos that are solo. Glad they had a trial membership. I wouldnt pay much more even if it were monthly.

Its too bad.....with the models they get in. If they were to concentrate on solo video instead of pictures they would be a hit. Im not saying that cause Im a solo female fanatic.....but lets face it...there arent too many out there.

06-14-07  05:08pm

Replies (0)
Review
6
Visit Paul Markham Teens

Paul Markham Teens
(0)

90.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Awsome site. Nice looking young amatures. great niches (well what Im looking for anyway). As I have stated in all my reviews this is for video only...I never look at pictures.
Paul has a forum that enables you to talk directly with him. He listens to what you have to say that can improve his site.
Cons: Updates are normally videos of models recirculated through.
Bottom Line: Good site. Good owner. Quite a few models. Some Im sure you have seen and remebered from other places.

03-01-07  09:17pm

Replies (1)
Review
7
Visit In Focus Girls

In Focus Girls
(2)

68.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Easy navigation. A lot of models. Very pretty women. as much as glamor as anythign else.
Cons: I dont look at pictures so this is for there videos only. They didnt stick to there site name as often as I would expect. Many shots were way out of focus...so much so I thought it was funny.
Very few videos and actually very few I would watch. normally the models would go through the motions and then they were done. Its typical of amature sites that offer solo masturbation.
Bottom Line: As with dozens more sites. I have this on my list to check out again later. I wouldnt recommend it right now.

03-01-07  09:10pm

Replies (0)
Review
8
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Tons of models. Professional site. Easy navigations. Whats better then watching a nice looking girl get herself off? Thats what this place has to offer.
Cons: scenarios way off. Too artsy. Needs to tone down a little, simple is better. FTV toy? Why? Personally I like to see sincere solo masturbation. I like to see the model get herself off....not just shove whatever is available in her snatch.
Bottom Line: They have a lot going for them. Tone it down a little. Maybe have the model do her solo on a bed instead of anywhere else. Dont be afraid of getting the snatch in view when shes cumming and you should have something big.

03-01-07  09:02pm

Replies (0)
Review
9
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)

85.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Tons of models. Easy site navigation. Has a forum to talk with him directly. Has some good videos (I never look at pictures). Constantly updating.
Cons: video needs a ton of work for itself. Too much movement, bad angles ect. As explained to matt in his forum. Camera people dont make the best video people.
Bottom Line: I have recommended others to his site...specifically to see the chantell video....it sets itself apart from the rest. Although again the video work could have been better. He got everything into the shot.
The internet is bogged down with female solo videos of models just going through the motions. Web masters claiming they have more then whats really offered.
I noticed here recently that he was getting more involved with the solo performances. That doesnt make it solo and have my own term for it....one mans jollies. Keeping things natural as possible and actually as simple as possible is what the internet needs. Hes almost there.

03-01-07  08:50pm

Replies (0)
Review
10
Visit Ron Harris

Ron Harris
(0)

65.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: High end site. Personal touch. nice looking models.
Cons: I didnt feel he did his videos for his viewers. Almost like bubble girls, he did them just as much for himself (his own jollies) as he did for concerns that the video would be what people would pay to see.
Bottom Line: Theres a ton of amature places out there. Most are bad....this doesnt fall into that category. But he needs more updates and better scenarios to get me to return.

03-01-07  08:40pm

Replies (0)
Review
11
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

96.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Easy navigation, plenty of updates.
Very professionally done site. A ton of nice looking eager beavers. The site is definately the top of the amature sites that feature female solo masturbation. They dont get too artsy like some of the others do. I dont know if youre like me. Simple is better....girl laying on bed...decides to get off....Actually gets off. Shes not shoving cucumbers in her snatch. Not pretending to get off on an over sized butt plug.
Cons: They need to work on the videos themselves. The rating would have been higher if this were the case. As with most amature sites....the video people move way too much....so much its almost sickening. Concentrating on this will bring them much more in terms of a viewing audience.
Bottom Line: The best amature site out there....doesnt have the artsy stuff that ftv does....doesnt do the sick and twisted stuff that als scans does. But does offer a little more then matts does.
I dont look at the photos so I couldnt grade that.

03-01-07  04:58pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-11 of 11  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.89 seconds.