Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : largeun (9)  

Feedback:   All (51)  |   Reviews (7)  |   Comments (9)  |   Replies (35)

Other:   Replies Received (34)  |   Trust Ratings (15)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Brazzers


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of content.
Good quality pics.
Good and varied content.
Cons: Movie quality is below par.
Slow navigation.
Really plastic tits.
Bottom Line: I was not too happy with this site and probably because I am a member of Videobox and Hot Legs and Feet and they blow Brazzers out the water in terms of quality and variety.

For me this site is a real let down as the Flash is superior in quality to the best quality downloads they offer.

It's time they moved up in terms of quality and it's a shame they still haven't addressed this issues as their content is actually quite good if you can get past the fake tits.

09-11-08  06:04am

Replies (1)
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: WMV (.wmv),5000k (up to 5673), 1280x720
DivX (.avi),4000k (up to 4162), 1280x720
MOV (.mov), 2000k, 960x540

Hi res pics and just about every vid scene has accompanying zipped images.

Stunning women (mainly Eastern European).
Exclusive content.
Crystal clear quality.
Good locations and sets.
Good Variety both in terms of women and 'themes'.
Excellent service.
Great 'new' price, which I have been hankering (posh British word) after for ages.
Good download speeds.
Little DRM, almost none for newer content.
Cons: Need more ethnicity.
Repeated and recycled content across the network sites.
Some dead links and unable to find certain stars via DDF main model directory.
Cheery Jul and Sandy's Fantasies stopped updating in 2007.
Slowish updates.
Older material ropey in quality.
Machine gun sex a la geezas a bit formulaic and not too sexy.
Better navigation from main site desperately needed.
Bottom Line: Repeated and recycled content is one of those areas that can be either okay if presented properly or just plain thieving if not. DDF suffers a little from both.
For example: Only Blowjobs carries the blowjob segments from the main movies across the network. Euroteen Erotica uses the so called younger looking babes from the main movies across the network........and so on.
Exceptions being mainly DDF Busty and House of Taboo.

Now, this is common practice amongst all the porn sites. Brazzers has a couple of thousand sections and categories but they are repeats from the main archive. The same can be said for many sites.

However, DDF do provide category and niche content and it makes sense to split these into defined websites. If I want to look at wenches with mutha mams I can do so without having to be forced to view said mams across all the network sites.
Sure, there are repeats and 'remastered' old content but for the price and content I am not whinging too much. However, and I have said this many times before, remastering from the original source files can be an up in quality, remastering from an existing compressed file is simply adding to the overal filesize and offering nothing in terms of increased quality.

I do object to poor links and altered tags for the downloads. I must have wasted a good day downloading the same fukin' content from the network sites as the thumbnails and tags were different from the original download links.

Main directory should carry links to visible downloads.

Whinging out of the way. Lets talk about the good shit:

Stunning, and I mean stunning babes, not the usual fukin' known stars in their treble figure ages doing the same shit. Nope, these girls are simply horny as fuck.
Some wear too much makeup but most of that is gone by the time the muscly dude has hit the money-shot.

Quality is amazing and the standard setter and if other sites followed suit then we would all be joyous wankers.

The themes and genres that DDF cover are unequalled.
Hot Legs and Feet is exactly that. Attractive women in mad clothing doing shit that we dream of.
There is very little as sexy as a well dressed woman slowly undressing out of her clothes and 'mandatory' (this must be made law) lingerie and then getting ass fukked by some dude with an 18 pack.

Anyways, this is what I like.

Some of you might prefer big-ass girls with mams the size of a small Skud missile launcher, and I am cool with that, and they too can be found on DDF busty. I might not be down with anything bigger than Lou Ferrigno but the 'big' babes at Busty are damn sexy, well dressed, and fukin horny.

Most know that I can be quite frugal with my ratings and I do like to put these sites under the wallet microscope. But TBH, at the current umbrella price with the content offered it's a no brainer.

Okay, enough exalting and if DDF are reading this then I think a weekend with Aletta Ocean and Jade Sin would be an appropriate 'thank you' for me

11-04-09  07:06am

Replies (1)
Visit Hands on Hardcore

Hands on Hardcore

Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Dudes below have done all the stats work so I'll keep it more descriptive
-Excellent high quality
-Gorgeous babes and not always the run of the mill 'known' ones
-Good service
-Great fetish concentration
-Great sets
-Top quality direction and editing
-Not scared to show babes with a touch of bush...thank fuk!
-Stockings! About fukin time
-European and the odd ethnic babe
-Good multi format options
-No broken links
Cons: -Slow updates
-Need more niche content
-Need more variety as the sets and focus can be a touch formulaic
-Need many more ethnic babes
-Price needs to be a bit more competitive as competition is becoming fierce
-Dudes need to spark up their game a touch
-Regional damn pricing
Bottom Line: There is very little to fault with this site.
The babes are all boner inducing.
The dudes can be a touch 'mechanical' in their rumping approach, but hey, I probably would be too.
The hi res content and good download speeds make this a standard setter and there are only a handful of sites that incorporate this approach. The smaller volume sites really need to start getting their act together in terms of resolution. The days of looking at a clip with one eye whilst said eye is being cleaned with a brillo pad are over.
With more regular updates and variety in terms of babe selection this site could be the leader in it's class.
There aren't many foot fetish sites out there and the odd one that offers some footy usually affords us the zelda type of 800 kilo babe with torn fishnets. Might be boner inducing for some but I like attractive women in stockings getting lengthed in a nice or theme based setting.
If updates and more variety is introduced into this porn equation then the price is a steal. Currently, and the reason I didn't moisten the score up a tad, the price is a little steep, particularly for us UK dudes. I must say I really am getting fed up with all these regional pricings.
Either way, this site is a winner and if they would do another set with Lulu and Jade Sin then I would join in a heartbeat, or bonebeat if you may.

06-01-09  04:22am

Replies (2)
Visit Hot Legs and Feet

Hot Legs and Feet

Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: The dude below me gave the stats so I will concentrate on content, service and overall 'delivery of goods'.

Excellent quality and fast download speeds(4MBit) 1280x720
Multi formats
Decent sets
Nut burstingly horny babes
Good support (now)
Good camera work
Classy and pro presentation
Exclusive content
'Casting' shorts are a great addition
Stockings (about fukin time)
Cons: REGIONAL damn pricing
Not enough updates
Some 'movement' of content from other DDF sites and some recycled older low res quality, although both are not repeated content
Not enough ethnic babes
Too many solos and same 'format' dudes
Not enough location shoots although the shoots are classy
Older films are low res and many models not repeated again
Bottom Line: If you're into legs n shit, like I am, then this site is the leader in it's genre/field.
Stunning babes wearing hot gear in cool locations and emphasis being on feet and legs they do not disappoint.
The exclusive content is one of it's attractions. You will get the odd 'known' babe but the scenes are still exclusive.
I could do with more variety in terms of ethnic babes, guys who don't 'machine-gun' rump the babes as sometimes it's nice to 'see' the sex, maybe some better location shoots and re-introduction of babes from their back catalogue would be a winner.

The regional pricing stinks and I for one am really fukin sick of this shit. You can't call a 'small person' a midget any more unless you want your nuts torched and your house sold in compensation, but you can charge what the fuk you like when it comes to us in the UK.

I love this site but due to their slow updates and regional pricing it's not one I would stay a member of on a monthly and regular basis.

I also believe, much like other 'umbrella' sites, that there should be a discounted membership for those who want to sign up to all the DDF sites. It makes sense and keeps the variety and update aspect manageable.

Had it not been for the updates and regional pricing practices I would have thrown a few more points on the overall score. And until sites realise that we ARE their income streams and they stop treating us as if they are doing us favours then maybe the scores would grow and sites would establish a long and loyal paying customer base.

08-03-09  07:45am

Replies (0)
Visit Sex And Submission

Sex And Submission

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I won't repeat all the stats that others have done so eloquently here. So, I will keep it brief and relevant.

In terms of quality, it is excellent. The newer movies are top notch with good editing.

The women are well known but the slant on their presentation makes for a refreshing change. I have seen Trinity Post a gazillion times but not the way she is portayed on this site. The same goes for all the 'known' babes.

I like this site because it is not just focused on the S&M action but includes sex which, for me, is crucial.

The guys certainly know their thing and it always makes for a smoother experience.

Great 'feel'.

Sensible layout with multiple download options for movies and pics.
Cons: Not much content.

Old films are grainy.

Older films are grainy and almost invisible. I believe a gnat would have a better change of ascertaining the action within.

Misleading star search. I searched for Adriana Nicole and found many links for her but the way the links were presented they lead the user to believe the star is on the sexandsubmissive site. However, you are led to another Kink.com site whereby you have to sell an organ or two to join. This form of clever external linking is a new trend that is both annoying and underhand. Spreading content by the same star across sites under the same umbrella that require further subs is not something I like.

Could do with some different scenery and situations.

Could do with some fresh faces that we have not come across.

I need more ethnic babes, more fukin' stockings and classy outfits and maybe some bush would be a refreshing change.
Bottom Line: Refreshing and fucking sexy even if you are not into the S&M type of content, which I am not.

Great quality on the newer films and it's about time others followed suit.

Needs more content and more updates.

Needs an all-in umbrella membership so we can get all the babes under one roof. Hell, I'd pay the difference in price.

One of my favourite sites and very cleverly thought out to grab the middle market of dudes like me who like lovely babes getting a tad roughed but not bludgeoned beyond recognition.

01-29-09  11:30am

Replies (0)
Visit VideoBox


Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: I am not going to repeat what half the planet have eloquently said here. So if you want stats read the dudes below me.

A vast selection of movies in various resolutions and formats.
All the regular porn stars and some fresh faces from various sources.
Decent ethnic categories.
Easy to navigate categories.
Good bookmarking system that actually works.
Good price.
Good support.
Cons: It's about fukin' time they moved onto higher res and size formats.
Not enough niche content.
Non exclusive content.
Repackaging of older material as new titles a little deceptive and quality is akin to watching a movie underwater, in the dark and with one dodgy eye.
Bottom Line: For sheer volume this site wins hands down.
A great selection of known porn babes and unknowns that can be very refreshing and affords variety.

Quality needs to be updated to comply with today's standards and easier bandwidths.

More niche content would be wonderful.

Price is a non arguable topic.

This site could really be the king of all pron sites if it would up it's quality, have more detailed niche content and maybe some exclusivity.

I, for one, would be happy to pay the extra premium to attain the above.

04-29-09  06:52am

Replies (0)
Visit VideosZ


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Vast library covering most genres
Decent navigation
Cheap and competitive
Has content that some competitors don't supply
Regular and prolific updates
Good bookmarking system
Cons: Selective formats and few options
Quality average at best
Misleading search content, but then most sites do this
Removing a bookmarked scene reverts you to page 1 of your saved bookmarks. That can be annoying if you are on page 93 of your bookmarked scenes
Non exclusive content
Repetitive content titled differently. This is a trick that most sites adopt and is an underhand way of 'adding' content
No 'scene to scene' selection for download
Bad searches on stars that share the same names
Not enough niche content - I searched for Teen-Anal-Asian-Lingerie and only got a few hits. That made me sad
Bottom Line: I am not sure I am convinced about this site.

Of course, the immediate comparable is Videobox which I believe has better quality content, better niche content and the 'scene to scene' download option is a winner.

I am also not convinced on quality. It is one thing converting the source content to a higher res format, but it's another if the source content already exists in a low grade res and all you are doing is providing a claimed higher res format that adds nothing to the quality of the original. I downloaded a bunch of clips that looked good as images when auditioning and were highly dodgy when viewed, even at MP4.

The quality issue really is hit and miss and out of the ..ahem...104 clips I downloaded only 12 were good enough to keep.
I recently lost my bat vision abilities and watching some of the grainy shit was akin to taping my eyes with surgical stockings and then trying to watch a 10x10 pixel video clip from 9 kilometres during the Perfect Storm.

In terms of sheer volume of content you can't really go wrong and the recent PU discounted price makes it a steal. And TBH that is the only reason I gave this site a rating of 82.

If you put the price aside then it's an average site with tons of very average low res content of well known run of the mill stars.

Remastering old material into hi res content is, of course, time consuming and costly in terms of bandwidth and server space. But FFS these sites make an absolute fortune so don't be conned into thinking they are doing us a favour.

Sites that offer hi res and exclusive content, albeit at a cost, are the future as we now posses the means to watch in any format and with no restrictions on cpu handling.

It's time 'these' site like VZ and VidBox upped their game because reviews 5 years down the road will simply slate and ignore them.
Quantity is one thing but it's ultimately quality that always wins, and I, for one, am willing to pay the difference to attain this.

05-18-09  04:05am

Replies (1)

Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.48 seconds.