Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : DivBZero (13)  

Feedback:   All (84)  |   Reviews (17)  |   Comments (7)  |   Replies (60)

Other:   Replies Received (44)  |   Trust Ratings (18)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-17 of 17  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(2)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The Image quality on this site is outstanding. In particular resolution and depth of field are stellar. The detail is of 'pore and folicle' at 3506 x 2336.

The predominately 'euro' models are truly gorgeous and well presented in both Solo and Girl-Girl mode.

Some videos are HD at 1280x720 and well encoded.

The update and rentention policy means there is a lot of content available.
Cons: The sets are split into episodes which tend to be short and of varying progression. Sometimes there is a lot of progress and in others there are many similar images.

Sometimes the action is so rude it gets 'gyno' and not erotic. In particular the 'fists and speculum' series can have an almost sterile edge to them.
Bottom Line: This is a technically good site with good fit models and commendable rudeness. It undoubtably deserves praise.

For this reviewer however the "frisson per set" ratio was low and gave an overall feeling of detachment.

More smiles, cheekiness. toys that match the outfits, sets and proportions of the models would be nice. If only Suburban Amateurs could deliver Alsscan's technical image excellence.

This is my honest review, not sure why I made it since I suspect the trust rating will get a bashing from fans!

Cheers DivBZero

10-17-07  02:10pm

Replies (3)
Review
2
Visit Paid 2 Pose

Paid 2 Pose
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The photography here is natural and has a good amateur feel to it. The girls look homely, welcoming and genuinely sexy. The navigation is standard imagefolio and therefore easy to follow.

There are plenty of toys here, although later on in the large sets. Mostly these are shown in context with not too many boring closeups.

Images are crisp although only 1,280 x 852 pixels are at 300K+ so not much compression.
Cons: Lack of ZIP downloads is a major distraction on this site, takes ages to build up a set on ones HD

Sets are overly long with 10+ images very very little change.
Bottom Line: The models are what makes this site compelling. I'd rejoin if they had ZIP facilities and at least 1600x200 images (preferably more).

06-18-07  11:40am

Replies (0)
Review
3
Visit Nude 2 Rude

Nude 2 Rude
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There's a range of very natural looking models here photographed in a range of settings, some clearly studio and some home based. The posing of the models is genuinely provocative and has a good sense of what makes a set erotic. Lots of toys, although I've never seen the appeal of speculums...

The 3000px image size is wonderful and the colour balance is near perfect (i.e. natural). The price at 12.95USD non-recurring is great for 3-4 evenings entertainment.

The HD videos are great
Cons: The ZIP files are only for the NORMAL and LARGE sizes, you'll have to build you own for the X-LARGE, which is a pain because they use 22.JPG as image names so you have to work to keep the sets together.

The other odd thing is the navigation, you can get to the current sets by just clicking, all the previous sets take you back to the CCBILL page, however you can get to them by entering the direct URL, in the form of:

http://www.nude2rude.com/members/set.php?set=46

Guess its just a cookie
Bottom Line: Great images of good looking natural models that are nicely past teendom and certainly way before milfdom. One can easily believe they are amateur or near amateur.

Content is building nicely and the price is better that others who believe they are premium, would appreciate the X-LARGE available is zip though

DivBZero

04-30-07  04:34am

Replies (0)
Review
4
Visit Just Teen Site

Just Teen Site
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The images here, especially the hi-res images are about as good as you'll find on the internet!!

The videos are smooth and well encoded.

The models are natural and flawless, which is pretty useful considering the 2,592 x 3,872 pixels image size.

The posing and the settings are great, well lit and fashionably chosen clothing. There is some very good use of form and natural lighting, the outside sets show this well.

The sets are basically solo and girl-girl.
Cons: To be fair the site is rated as 'softcore' and this is what you get. Its very gentle and hardly a finger strays where it perhaps ought.

The posing puts you into the frame of mind where one 'likes' the models rather than 'lusts' after them.
Bottom Line: A great photographic site with proper high res-images. Its softcore (as it says on the tin).

A few well chosen and well placed toys would lift this site to stratospheric heights.

04-14-07  02:40pm

Replies (0)
Review
5
Visit HD Solo Girls

HD Solo Girls
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There is a reasonable range of high-def video content here. Basically it gives what it says on the tin. The models are sweet and the interaction with the female interviewer is passable although the 'accent' makes the whole thing cuter. As far as I can tell the videos are exclusive. Note that only the ones starting SB are full resolution.
Cons: The HD videos are fairly compressed at around 150-250Mb each. The colours are very heavy at the red end of the spectrum and this detracts from the overall presentation. There were some 'jerks' even on my powerful system (dual xeon).

There are no HD photos and those that are there are generic.
Bottom Line: There's a free trial so one can find out if my comments are true. I reckon the HD vids will suit many customers. There are about 4 pages of 16 videos at present, so not a mega site.

I cancelled the trial, basically because the full cost doesn't justify - this is only my opinion, and I'm fairly fussy about quality. Note that you get a fair offer when you goto cancel.

04-09-07  01:48pm

Replies (1)
Review
6
Visit Solo Interviews

Solo Interviews
(0)

51.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Navigation is OK, Video quality passable (only the later sets) and presentatable young ladies, well dressed in good settings.
Cons: This site is having a complete and utter giraffe (laugh at our expense) when they say "HIGH QUALITY PICS" on the inside and "Hi-Res Quality Pics" on the tour. The best I saw clocks in at 700 x 1,050 pixels, and this is only available in the latest sets. The pictures appear to be taken on an Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT. which surely must cost less than a models fee.

Videos reported to be 621MB in size, were actually 90MB.
Bottom Line: I checked through the family of sites offered in the one months membership - the quality is consistently poor across all.

I suggest that one steers away from these sites until they have learnt to present their wares in a manner consistent with their descriptions.

03-13-07  02:09pm

Replies (3)
Review
7
Visit Suburban Amateurs

Suburban Amateurs
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Suburban Amateurs is a site that could easily be called 'Suburban semi-professionals shot by professional photographer'. The photos have an amateur feel but are well lit and well posed. There is a flavour of naughiness in the models that comes across well.

The videos have a quality about them and sometimes the narration is so kitsch its wonderful.
Cons: Images scream - supersize me ... and if only the webmasters could start doing the sets in 1600x1200 ....

Oddly enough this is one of those sites where the portrait images have better resolution than the landscape versions. ukamateurs is another site with this affliction. I believe they use the same pool of models, but suburban amateurs is the better of the two.
Bottom Line: I have a real hope that this site will realise its full potential. Posing and quality of the (small) images is fine.

02-25-07  03:28pm

Replies (0)
Review
8
Visit Super Glam

Super Glam
(0)

89.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: SuperGlam absolutely *has* to be commended for its photography. Its clean, sharp and uncompressed. The models are well presented in good sets. This kind of photography has that beautiful, almost 3D effect where you can sometimes forget there is a whole internet and monitor twix viewer and model.
Cons: I really object to a range of sets being partially updated. There seems to be no point, other than to get daily updates. But I'd prefer less, just let me know when a set is finished so I might download it.

There's a fair number of photos per set so waiting for a complete update takes a while.

They have clearly got a good webmaster somewhere based on the quality of the design -- where it all falls down is useability.

Note that ZIPs didn't work for most of January
Bottom Line: One would join this site on the quality of the images, models and poses alone. Once you've joined, its up to you to work a strategy for getting at the content you like. A graphically beautifull site with some useability challenges.

02-21-07  01:16pm

Replies (0)
Review
9
Visit Cum Bots

Cum Bots
(0)

81.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: First of all this is a top-end site in terms of rudeness. It certainly rivals f**kingmachines, the models get the same treatment, although somehow just a little less rampant and slightly sweeter. The *REAL* advantage over FM is the quality of the lighting, the images are a brighter and much more of the models excitement and drama comes across.
Cons: Although the Videos have a good resolution, they have skimped on the frame rate, so there are jerky sections. The Images although good, really really really need to be 1600x1200 resolution to support the premium price for this site. I'll suggest its premmium because of the 4 updates a month.

There really is no excuse for the poor nagivation !!
Bottom Line: This site *should* be better than FM, the sets are better photographed and there is more communication between model and viewer. However resolution and navigation issues hold it a way off the top slot.

02-20-07  03:36pm

Replies (0)
Review
10
Visit Fucking Machines

Fucking Machines
(1)

79.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: First, let me clearly state that this is a very very rude site, with rather rude activities. That said, it has a curious fascination that brings members back time and again. I suspect it is the very naughtiness and the joy of seeing models manically machined and delightfully done. When the models 'glow' you can be fairly sure its for real.

Its clear from the videos that their equipment is powerful and gets the job done so as to speak.
Cons: Something happens to the images twixt camera and site. Its not nice, the images become darker and the detail goes. You can tell that the original work was well lit (sometimes creativily). However the HiDef shots are typically 1200x1000 and are not sharp with colour bandings which indicate over processing. I'd really appreciate seeing the 'RAW' images. This is the *only* thing that lets down this creative site.
Bottom Line: This is the 'top-end' of naughty rudeness for me. Its curiously compelling. Improvements in image quality would send my rating stratospheric.

02-09-07  02:09pm

Replies (0)
Review
11
Visit Virtua Girl 2

Virtua Girl 2
(0)

96.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: If you like photography you be loving this site. The images are well lit clean and perfectly balanced. Its obviously a glamour thing but done very very well. The backgrounds are mostly white which helps with image size. Occaisonally the poses and model communication are brilliant.
Cons: Video's are not really high-def. It would help to have a few more toys and have the models getting truly aroused.

*note that you have to pay for the 'back-catalogue' on a per model basis - bit rude for a premium site.
Bottom Line: Lovely clean site, worth it for the photograph.

02-06-07  04:06pm

Replies (6)
Review
12
Visit Xisty

Xisty
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good high res photography with a reasonable colour balance, verving on the too warm but thats down to many outside photos in sunny climes
Cons: The sets are often long and a bit samey, I reckon that near the same content is available on TeenDreams but without the 3000pix ZIP versions
Bottom Line: Well worth the trial membership if only just to get the 3000px better sets.

02-04-07  01:51pm

Replies (1)
Review
13
Visit Dodger.co.uk

Dodger.co.uk
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The posing and the content of these two sites (the nylon and pantyhose) is quite well conceived. There is plenty of content and if you like hose you like these sites.
Cons: Apart from the very latest updates the images are not really hi-def. However there are the odd gems amongst the chaff.
Bottom Line: Good for the actual content and posing but a crying shame that the images are not hi def. I hope this continues and that the hidef is not just for the week of issue.

01-12-07  01:42pm

Replies (0)
Review
14
Visit Explicite Art

Explicite Art
(1)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Good Photography, virtually straight from the digital camera to the website. Photoshoots set up well and a good erotic eye.
Cons: Sometimes too mach similar images in a set.
Bottom Line: This is a site with a 'french' view of erotica, which, can sometimes seem offbeat, but actually well worth the membership.

01-10-07  05:31pm

Replies (0)
Review
15
Visit Sexy Teen Paradise

Sexy Teen Paradise
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of content, lots of variety - great smiles, very very good search system
Cons: This is advertised as high def and it really isn't. The compression on the images is really lamentable. This is a real real shame because it is obvious that the quality of the original photographs would have be stunning.
Bottom Line: Lots of content lacking image quality.

Follow-Up:
I've had a reply from the WebMaster to my original review. I've checked the claims. To their credit they have reprocessed many of the image sets and the newer versions are indeed much more clean and lacking compression artifacts. For our readers, we're at medium resolution here, typically 1200x800. I'll take this opportunity to restate that the images well lit, well posed and decent smiles. If you're a general user I'd say the current improvements make this site a real contender.

01-10-07  04:34pm

Replies (1)
Review
16
Visit All Ruth

All Ruth
(0)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Photography is good, clearly learning from the Simonscans stable.

Posing is often cute and genuinely erotic.
Cons: Updates are regular but perhaps too few.
Bottom Line: This is a great site to join twice a year, the quality is there and you'll feel that Ruth cares about what she is doing.

01-10-07  04:05pm

Replies (0)
Review
17
Visit Simon Scans

Simon Scans
(1)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Good Photography - hi def with good colour graduations - some sites, for example Paul Markhams have large images but with over saturated colours that wreck definition.

Girls seem genuinely happy
Cons: Video Quality is a bit behind the curve, posing and action great, however better encoding would be the icing on the cake
Bottom Line: I believe this is currently the best site out there.

01-10-07  03:58pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-17 of 17  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.72 seconds.