Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : ramscrota (12)  

Feedback:   All (114)  |   Reviews (22)  |   Comments (7)  |   Replies (85)

Other:   Replies Received (33)  |   Trust Ratings (17)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-22 of 22  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit DDF Busty

DDF Busty

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Well organised site. All scenes have pics & vids
-Easy navigation
-No phony tits
-Big tits not just on over-weight girls; many have average build & large tits
-HQ pics. Most sets have a choice of size
-Pic sets not too large (ie not too many pics)
-Photography: they bother to snap the moment the guy comes (sister site 1 by day tends to do it better). Too many sites ignore important nuances like this. If sites bother with pics, they should do it properly, like this one
-Range of vid size selection
-Range of scene types: solo, GG & HC - toys, anal insertions, 69, anal sex, etc
-Some variety of scene type: occasional hints of dom/sub, or Melanie D & Emily Cartright, who slop glue on each others' tits!
-Tasteful, clean decor & settings. (many sites have dingy, messy settings, or ugly decor completely devoid of any erotic feel)
-PRICE: good value & payment options
-LOGIN & PW is sensible: they let you choose your own easy to remember word Also no 'enter the code' rubbish
Cons: -Although variety of vid sizes, only lower Q vids are broken into separate clips
-Although there is variety, much of the action is cliche, formula stuff. EG phoney-looking squirming around, licking through clothing/lingerie, and rubbing & jiggling of boobs before model has removed clothing. Also annoying is single-lick oral, single-lick kissing, etc.
-Often the ladies don't undress properly befer the action starts. ACtion with knickers still on (crutch pulled aside for cock, dildo, or licking. Looks like standard, drab formula, instead of rampant lust. This kind of thing is okay every now and then, but on this site it seems to be the norm.
-TOO MUCH LOOKING AT THE CAMERA Especially the photos
-Too many scenes begin with model(s) stripped down to lingerie (more evidence of formual approach)
-silly positioning for close-ups. Happens most often in doggie, but also in missionary where guy positions himself out of line so we can see entry. An annoying tendency in porn, this.
Bottom Line: Summary
A good-value, high-quality site, easy to navigate, easy to find good models, and user friendly. The site focuses on models with large boobs, but it's not a fetish site - you get the full menu (pussy, sex, cum-shots, oral, etc). But they make good use of the large tits - eg boucing them around, self-licking, etc. The doggy sex scenes are particularly good, because these give scope for the ladies' udders to swing around like sets of wrecking balls. Usually the cum shots are over the tits, something which I find a bit limited. I prefer them to be in the mouth or face, preferably with the girl jacking the guy off.
Nevertheless, it's one of the better sites around, value-wise. The only thing that prevents it from being a top-rating site are several of
those irritating formula aspects which seem to come not from a sense of natural erotica, but the girls doing what they're told (see above in the 'cons'). If the site organizers freed themselves of much of this nonsense, this really would be a top-rating site.

02-05-09  10:35pm

Replies (3)
Visit Real Spankings Institute

Real Spankings Institute

Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Spankings quite severe and real
- Attractive, young girls
- Most girl have pubic hair.
- Good navigation
- Pics & vids each set.
- Sets not just in isolation: set within context of aims of the 'Real Spanking Institute', which gives shoots greater focus.
- Range of implements used: paddles, canes, straps, broad perspex plastic canes (real brutes of things. At least one really good scene with this)
Cons: - School uniform seems to dictate that standard shool underwear is but, white, baggy things which come out of grandma's wardrobe. Would have greater appeal of far more girls were caught wearing 'non-regulation' underwear.
- Not enough nudity.
- Use of hands for spanking. Get real! A hand spanking really does "hurt me more than it's going to hurt you." With all the wonderful implements available, why use hands?
Bottom Line: This is a convincing site. The introductory information presents the site within the context of how prison was not working for young female inmates, so the Government set up the Real Spanking Insitute as an experiment to bring these troubled young women back onto the straight and narrow. (Good to know the US Governent has some sensible policies. Someone should have a word in the ear of our man in Australia, Kevin Rudd, about this policy!)

The spankings vary in severity, according to the girl's misdemeanors, scenarios framed according to how much punishment and nudity the model has opted for.
On this point, the pay for the girls varies according to the severity of the spanking, and the amount of nudity they show.
I'm surprised at how little full nudity there is - If their butts are going to be beaten to a pulp, (which many of the girls obviously opt for) I can't understand why they don't go fully nude and get paid more.
There are, however, some really good scenes - and at least a few full nude scenes where the girls get a fairly severe buttock padding.
overall a good site, if you like this sort of thing.

One of the models featured is Jessica, whio also has her own site: Spanking Teen Jessica.

01-04-09  02:07am

Replies (1)
Visit Naughty Little Nymphs

Naughty Little Nymphs

Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Good pics, a rarity for this group of sites
Cons: - Absurd scenarios which completely rob the scenes of any of their erotic potential
- Males dressed in ridiculous costumes as they ravage the female. wolve's custume, etc. There isa logistical difficulty in getting his member through the gap in the custume, or balancing a giant owl's outfit as he roots away. Also many of these outfites make the guy's cock look tiny.
Bottom Line: Another example of this group of site's absurd attempts to be interesting. Their work is usually characterized by crass 'in your face' sex. Their time and energy would be better spent developing some sensitivities for genuine erotica.

12-30-08  08:12pm

Replies (0)
Visit Tug Job Queens

Tug Job Queens

Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Good models
- Easy navigation.
Cons: - Scenes are mechanical and completely lacking any sense of erotic tease.
- Models look like they are going through the motions. This surely is a reflection on the videogrpahers and site managers. I've seen these models do much better on other sites
- Scenes lack any sense of being a genuine sexual or erotic encouter between a horny guy and a sensual woman.
- Poor quality of pictures
- Poor cum shots, with a few drops of pathetic, clear fluid. Even worse, they sometimes us FAKE CUM!
Bottom Line: Tug Job Queens is one of a whole group of sites you get for membership with the Jerk Pass Off network. In Tug Job Queens, a beautiful naked women (or two) play with a guy's cock until be squirts his load over them (that at least is the aim) They are continually adding new sites. But quantity does not mean quality! I'd rather have half of what they offer, with double the quality.
The layout of this site is colourful, navigation is easy, and the models look lovely. But they're completely wasted on this site. The scenes have a trashy, tacky look about them, and are totally devoid of any erotic feel.
This site is reflective of the whole jerk-passoff network. Most of the sites and the scenes are fairly crass, 'in your face' sex, with no feel for genuine erotica. Also, many of the indoor scenes are shot in drab, dingy, dirty and untidy surroundings (eg some of the so-called classroom scens)
Don't be fool by the colourful front page and the luscious looking girls on this goup of sites! The sites are real dogs!

12-30-08  07:34pm

Replies (0)
Visit Naked Novices

Naked Novices

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - An occasional good pic set
Cons: - Trashy, disorganized navigation
- The vids don't download! I trie downloading, and they either didn;t work, or showed something totally irrelebvant to porn.
- Huge disparity between what they promise and what you get.
- Priced far too high for what you get ($34)
Bottom Line: A totally tacky site not worth the bother, and way overpriced.

12-30-08  07:18pm

Replies (0)
Visit Lainey X

Lainey X

Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Lainey (the model).
Cons: - Shockingly organized
- Very poor content, both video and pics.
Bottom Line: This is the official website of Lainey Baron. Lainey is a great model, and has terrific erotic persona. But unfortunately, her site is a total disaster area. The poverty of genuine content and poor organizations lies at the heart of the problem.
I have nver come across a solo model site that was any good, and this site is further evidence of the prolbems inherent in this genre.

12-30-08  07:12pm

Replies (0)
Visit Emily 18

Emily 18

Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Are you joking?
Cons: - No full nudity. I can't believe this in this day and age!
- Aweful quality vids
- Price far too high for what you get.
- feedback / forum on site is too hypersensitive to criticism. They say "Don't criticise Emily". Why shouldn't we? Her refusal to do FFN makes her complicit in the rip-off.
Bottom Line: I have never come across a solo model site that was any good. Emily's site is by far the worst of a bad bunch

12-30-08  07:03pm

Replies (0)
Visit Teen Flood

Teen Flood

Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Good models
Cons: - Photo sets very poor: set in drab, cramped dingy settings.
- Photgrapher is a complete bonehead with no erotic imagination: shoots often in cramped confinement, snaps from above the model, generally very little erotic appeal
Bottom Line: It's not the fault of the models that this site isa such a dead loss.

12-29-08  05:47am

Replies (1)
Visit Exploited Teens

Exploited Teens

Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Nice girls (how he got them on this dog of a site I don't know)
Cons: - Guy is a complete dropkick who talks too much
- Far too long taken to get to any action
- POV site. POV is trash. I understand it has a place in porn, but what that place is stuffed if I know.
- Guy sound totally bored. As he comes, he talks to the girls like he is giving a maths lesson.
- Guy's flop is exactly that - a flop. No raging horn here, but a bored, floppy piece of flacid meat, even when he cums. I would have thought a nme like Exploited Teens would convey a lusting, horny guy who can't wait to fuck 'em. Scarcely.
- Models look more interested in sex than the guy.
Bottom Line: A total rubbish site, the title being a complete misnomer. It's a pity we can't score lower that fifty - this site deserves it (zero would be about right). It galls me that jerks like this are making money out of this rubbish.
The only funny bit is at te end when he does the dirty on them, tells them he's not paying them, and they react accordingly. All staged, of course.
I notice that in the guidelines below, hey tell us to mention what site do well, and how it could be improved. This site doesn't do anything well, and could only be improved by wiping it completely.

12-28-08  04:32am

Replies (5)
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West

Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Real looking amateurs
- Generally a good sense of the erotic
- Being an Austraian, it is exciting seeing the shoots in some locations known to me.
- Great sense of fun on the site. Forum is one of the most enjoyable I've ever seen.
Cons: - Little HC sex. The BG scenes are pathetic.
- Pic sets are often far too long
- Many sets look chaotic and disorganized
- Many sets photographed or videoed in untidy, dingy surroundings. Annie needs to get a cleaner in, and put some attractive decor around her place.
Bottom Line: A good site for those who love pics, and a sense of fun (the forum is great!). But this site is a lot like Australian society and culture - some good things, but messy, chaotic and unplanned.

12-28-08  04:02am

Replies (0)
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America

Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Good lot of great models
- Imaginative range of scenes
- Dialogue seems real, not dubbed.
- Reasonably well organized
Cons: - Pics are very poor quality
- Some sites under this umbrella feature manufactured and absurd scenarios, with equally absurd dialogue - su has "FUCK the shareholders!"
- Good scenes, but nothing out of the ordinary
Bottom Line: A good lot os sites, but nothing out of the ordinary. Listed under amateurs - I guess all these girls were amateurs once. They read like a who's who of porn - eg Sarah Stone, Kristie Lee, Venus, etc, etc. But that's not a criticism; it's just that if your expecting genuine amateurs, this is not the site for it.

12-28-08  03:43am

Replies (0)
Visit Little Mutt

Little Mutt

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Good models
- Great scenes: really genuine erotic lovemaking
- HQ pics & vids
- Site really well organized
- LOVE the massage scenes.
Cons: - Limited number of models. But that will increase with time
- WM seems to have a thing against girls with big boobs, as well as girls carrying any weight.
- Some models seem to treat the shoots as a joke.
Bottom Line: A great site, that could do with very little room for improvement. Has a great sense of the genuinelt erotic.

12-28-08  01:45am

Replies (0)
Visit Wired Pussy

Wired Pussy

Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Good concept
- Good models
- Well organized site. Other (Non DBSM) site could do well to follow their format
- Great balance of punishmwnt and reward.
Cons: - Could do with greater addition of other bondage 'therapies'. Personally, I would love to see electric bondage combined with whipping / spanking / paddling, as well as skackling and other restraints.
Bottom Line: Great site that could only be improived marginally. My favourite of this gorup of sites.

12-28-08  01:32am

Replies (2)
Visit Ultimate Surrender

Ultimate Surrender

Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Lovely models (mostly)
- HQ pics & vids
- Site well organized
Cons: - Too much the same formual
- Fight rounds too long, hence total shoots FAR too long. Should be cut by half and spent more time on final round where trhe victor has her way with the loser.
- Too many scene have rough sex, I understand that this is a BDSM site, but for me, gagging, sudden spinal jolting, hair pulling, has no erotic appeal. Spanking is fine, but anything which endangers the sub's spinal alignment or her airway is a no-np
- Instead of the current MC (Matt), I would prefer to see one (or two) super-fit, leanly built mean-looking guys, dressed up to the nines.
Bottom Line: Site has good potential, but makes serious and pnvious blunders, which rob it of real erptic spice.

12-28-08  01:23am

Replies (4)


Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Lovely girls
Girls presented in an extremely erotic and tasteful manner
Great picss
Lots of pubic hair
Love the fact that shoots are in intersting places eg outdoors, in the woods, on a railway line, etc
Cons: Scenes too much the same -they all start nude. no sense of the tease by an erotic strip
Videos very dull (for the same reason)
Too softcore for my liking
Bottom Line: An extremely good niche site for people who like softcore high quality nude pics. If that's your niche, then this site's for you.

07-04-07  05:20pm

Replies (0)
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica

Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: Great girls
Good quality pics
Good quality vids
Easy to navigate
Cons: Very little dialogue - after intro remarks, they sem to turn down the volume knob, Is the because the girls are non-english speakers? If so, keep the sound up! Half the fun of vids is hearing their exstatic moans & talk - even if it is in another language
Many of the vids too much the same.
Bottom Line: Good visual presentation, but could lift itself 50% with some sound (undubbed), and a bit more variety in the scenes.

07-04-07  05:13pm

Replies (0)
Visit Teens for Cash

Teens for Cash

Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Attractive girls
- Colourful scenarios
Cons: - Can't download videos. THAT'S CRAP.
- Site run by shonks who won't let you have full access until you upgrade your membership.
Bottom Line: My main annoyance with this site is the fact you can't download videos - you have to buy hard-copy DVDs (order thru site). That's a ripoff. All the sister sites (her first big cock; gangbang squad, her first DP are the same) Save your hard-earnt money for something else.

07-04-07  06:54am

Replies (0)
Visit Teen Pink Videos

Teen Pink Videos

Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Lots of attractive girls
- Site very easy to navigate
- A number of sets for each model
- Vid shoots include HC & Lesbian
- High quality lpics
Cons: - Too many shaved pussies
- Most girls a little underweight; fitting into that absurd idea that teens cannot possibly have large boobs
- Vids sound dubbed at times.
Bottom Line: Despite negatives, one of the best sites I have seen in a long time

07-04-07  06:47am

Replies (0)
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models

Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good quality pics (other older ones aren't so great, but recent ones are very good)
- Amateurs
Cons: - Too many pics in shoots (100 pics; 150 for fuck scene is long enough)
- Pics too big for screen
- Mat has got into that DREAFUL HABIT of getting the girls to show sheir pussies at about pics 5 - thereby completely ruining the sense of erotic.
- Too many shaved pussies (as usual)
- If I see one more girl in that stupid pose of her finger in her mouth, I'll SMASH MY COMPUTER!
- Very few hardcore scenes
- Colours ugly (red & dark grey)
- Poor navigation
- Pages take too long to come up
Bottom Line: An over-rated site, with lots of attractive girls, but not much of real value.

07-04-07  06:27am

Replies (3)
Visit abbywinters


Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Good quality pics
- Girls look natural
- Good to see pubic hair
- Natural, outdoor shots
Cons: - Pubic hair is good, but many of them look like the rum jungle! Get a trim, for God's sake!
- Many girls not very attractive, and shoots with not much feel for the erotic
- Videos & pics too softcore
- Some pics sets completely disjointed (eg "Backstage" is a TLOS - a Truck Load Of Sh*t)
Bottom Line: Some good features, but too softcore, and sense of erotic is often missing. Many girls need to trim up their bushes

07-04-07  06:14am

Replies (2)
Visit Teen Dreams

Teen Dreams

Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Aurora Snow (the one decent video I got off it)
Cons: - Pictures woeful quality
- No coherence in the site
- Photo shoots done by boofheads who have no sense of the erotic - 5 pics, and then the girl is showing her spread pussy! The sense of the erotic tease is lost.
- TOO MANY SHAVED PUSSIES (as per usual)
Bottom Line: A vastly over-rated site with poor navigation & coherence. Do yourselves a favour and give it a miss.

07-04-07  06:04am

Replies (1)
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good quality photos
- Amateur girls: some first time shoots - can see that it's an exciting, erotic adventure for many of them
- Strip scenes (pics) are usually an erotic tease: great sense of the erotic
- Good range: strips, toys, hardcore; pics and videos
- Frequent updates
- Lots of girls with PUBIC HAIR! GREAT!!!
- Can vote for girls as well as scenes
Cons: - Naming of scenes could be more accurate (eg 'Athletic' catergory has schoolgirls; why not have schoolgirls as a separate group, given the high erotic appeal this would have?
- Some earlier vids average quality
Bottom Line: This is a really good site - one of the best I've been on.

07-04-07  05:49am

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-22 of 22  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.49 seconds.