Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Trip999 (4)  

Feedback:   All (22)  |   Reviews (3)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (17)

Other:   Replies Received (17)  |   Trust Ratings (13)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-3 of 3  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit Skokoff

Skokoff
(0)

83.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - High quality photography (2592x3872 portrait, 3872x2592 landscape in high quality)

- User-friendly site design/layout. Everything works!

- A number of very attractive models, especially Vera (Annabella, Irishka and Natasha also very nice!). Site features 93 models in total. Site has models index page - (http://www.skokoff.com/models.html)

- Zip downloads: available in high, medium and low quality

- Download managers permitted

- (Tongue in cheek) The back button doesn't stop working as with some other sites (eg Metart)!

- Cams/liveshow section available (have not checked it out myself though)
Cons: - Somewhat limited content as site only dates back to June 2008 (52063 photos in total). If site stays in operation, and updates keep on coming, this situation should obviously improve in time.

- Site does feature video clips but only 29 in total

- A little bit more in terms of models biographical info would be nice - eg likes, what they do outside of modelling. A biographical page attached to the end of each zip download (as happens with more recent Met-Art sets) would be great.
Bottom Line: I like to have my fingers in several pies at once, both hardcore and softcore and recently joined Skokoff to fulfil my ongoing desire for the latter. This is a very good site, though it cannot compete with the likes of sites like Met-Art (where I'm also currently a member) when it comes to sheer numbers/quantity of sets. Rather something more akin to a 'boutique' site where I have personally ventured mainly in order to pick up specific sets - but have indulged in the other material going whilst I'm around.

Nice and easy to use site, zips available - unlike my next destination - Rigin-Studio - where zips have been done away with (nominally, according to the owner, in an attempt to combat piracy).

Skokoff had been on my radar for a while and I finally got round to becoming a member about two weeks ago. Happy that I did.

A softcore, mainly photo site you will not find any masturbation/toys here as is seen at sites like Nubiles or Teen Dreams. This is an erotic photography, and not pornographic, site :-) There are a number of sets with 2 girls posing together, kissing and sucking of boobies/simulated fanny-licking permitted!

03-28-11  02:15pm

Replies (8)
Review
2
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I became a member of First Anal Quest (firstanalquest.com) just under a month ago, and thereby gained access to Double View Casting, which is very much a sister site to firstanalquest. I presume taking membership in the first instance of Doubleviewcasting would conversely allow respective access to Firstanalquest though I offer no guarantees!

I wasn't too sure what figure to give Doubleviewcasting. If it had been a stand-alone site I would have awarded it a much lower figure, for reasons given in 'Cons' section. Joint access to Firstanalquest though is a/the major pro about this site due to the increased amount of material that is thereby available.

I suppose the second 'pro' of this site as far as I am concerned is the actresses themselves. A fair few of them are *hot* and I have very much enjoyed seeing them in action. No doubt some of them can be found in action elsewhere on the net(eurobabeindex.com is a great cross-referencing tool for Russian/European gals).
Cons: I have to admit to giving up early on the 'double view' camera thing. I downloaded the first scene of interest to me in both normal and POV views to see what this double view thing was all about. The standard camera view clip was great. Switching on the POV view however the first thing I noticed is this big nose in the top right hand corner of the screen. Now some might be able to accomodate this type of thing when they're watching their clips and doing their thing....Me, I found it a tad offputting. In addition, the video quality on the POV clip was not as good as the standard camera clip of the scene. And that's where my experience with the POV angle ended. A bit lame I know - apologies.

What else? The number of clips on Doubleviewcasting itself is low (approx 25-30) but as has been mentioned previously this situation is improved on account of material available at Doubleanalquest (approx. 90).
Bottom Line: (cont'd from Cons - ran out of space)

A good number of the actresses on Doubleviewcasting also feature in different scenes on Firstanalquest.

Download speeds from Doubleviewcasting can be fairly slow at times (down to 68kb/s for me the other night) and I have generally found these to be lower than on Firstanalquest.

*Bottom Line

I very much like the style of action here and on Firstanalquest, though it certainly won't be to everyone's taste: the anal sex is fairly restrained and not very rough, but thereby quite erotic. Users who enjoy a bit more rough (as seen for example on the Norestnetwork) might not find Doubleviewcasting so much to their liking.

In addition I can understand why fans of action where the actresses become more 'involved' (vocally/facially at louder volumes) might want to look elsewhere. Me, I personally prefer more subtlety and lower volumes :-)

Some of the scenes that I have found on Doubleviewcasting (moreso on Firstanalquest) represent the best material that I have encountered so far. A few gems.

Each to their own!

01-13-11  03:00pm

Replies (0)
Review
3
Visit No Rest Network

No Rest Network
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I was about to purchase 4 of Mr Grandi's dvds from an online dvd retailer in Italy when I came across his website address on the back cover of one of his dvds. I quickly made up my mind that I was going to join his site instead. If, like me, you enjoy anal action + Russian ladies then this site will not disappoint. There are some very attractive actresses here engaging in the aforementioned activity.

Worth a mention is the presence of about 15 nice double anal scenes on the site (a genre which I am a recent convert to, and very much enjoy).

Users can choose from 2-3 download options for video quality for most clips (normal resolution, HD and Full HD). The quality is very good, as are the photos.
Cons: Not all the attractive ladies that you come across on Mr Grandi's network - and who you want to see doing anal - do anal. Boo hoo.

Use of a download manager when downloading video clips from this site is an absolute MUST. Frequently dropped connections when downloading will make you a bit terse otherwise! I personally use Free Download Manager which resumes broken downloads.
Bottom Line: As has been mentioned this is quite a hardcore site/network. Material available to members (but of no interest to me personally) includes a fair amount of lesbian anal fisting and gagging.

I have enjoyed being a member of this site as I like seeing attractive Russian women doing anal, and the site provides a good quantity of this material. The studio Sineplex produced a great deal of this type of material and this is what got me hooked. Discovering Giorgio Grandi and his Norestnetwork was therefore a happy moment for me. More recently I have joined a site called Anal-Pantyhose (part of the Ferro Network) which I am again very much enjoying. The action here is noticeably not so rough (which I personally prefer) as some of the action found on the Norestnetwork.

I'd recommend the Norestnetwork to anyone who enjoys seeing anal with hot looking women, but would maybe advise caution to anyone who might find some of the action mentioned above distasteful/a turn off. Apparently BDSM content is going to be added soon to this network - again, not something for me.

11-02-10  03:28pm

Replies (3)

Shown : 1-3 of 3  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.51 seconds.