Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : troglodite (69)  

Feedback:   All (103)  |   Reviews (38)  |   Comments (11)  |   Replies (54)

Other:   Replies Received (53)  |   Trust Ratings (34)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 38 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit 123 Lacey Pink

123 Lacey Pink

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Well uh obviously....the price! Any site that charges less than 2 bucks for a month-long membership and actually has content is a big bonus!

* Videos look pretty good at 1500k and 640x480

* Lacey is a "girl-next-door" style model which will undoubtedly be a plus for a lot of people

* You also get bonus access to a bunch of other sites, including some content from bangbros and the like (though I didn't check to see how complete the scenes may be).
Cons: I feel kinda bad nitpicking a sub-$2 site, but...

* Vids don't download though they do go to your internet cache and can be copied from there to your collection

* Some questionable upsells (will touch on those in a separate "warning" comment)

* Lots of the vids are behind-the-scenes of photoshoots

* Almost all links broken in the BTS section

* Music plays during all the vids - I was disappointed that I didn't get the chance to hear the interaction between her and her cameraman.
Bottom Line: Bottom line, there are a lot of negatives here, but still - it's a $2 site and if you like Lacey's look, you'll get your moneys worth despite some minor annoyances.

There are some upsells to be aware of, namely a box that must be unchecked at initial signup and then a $0 trial that can be backed out of if done carefully (see additional comment for more info). Like I mentioned - it's hard to nitpick a site that's under $2, but upsells with no real opt-out options can end up with 2 results: 1) The member always feels like they have to watch where they click or 2) The member accidentally gets hit with a charge they didn't expect and blames the site for doing something shady. I'll put it this way - I doubt any surfers really see these upsells as exciting opportunities for more free porn.

My biggest other gripe would be the broken links and the music. BTS scenes don't really feel "behind the scenes" when there's cheesy music playing over the entire clip.

Lacey is a cutie however, and if you're at all interested in seeing her enjoying some of her favorite toys, I'd give this one at least a look. I'd score it a lot lower if I paid for a standard membership, but for $2, the site at least *met* most of my expectations. I love the concept they're going for with the low-cost sites!

06-25-07  06:02pm

Replies (1)
Visit All Sites Access

All Sites Access

Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: There's a sheer mass of content among this network of sites. If you are a fan of a girl who's been a hardcore adult performer over the last 5 (?) years, you're likely to find her again here. The quality of content has grown with technology, and today each video clocks in at over 1600kbps and 720x480 resolution. The network spans so many genres that it would be hard to find a *normal* type of porn that is not featured here.
Cons: Things get maddeningly routine throughout most of the sites. Scenes are differentiated almost exclusively by the performer, and not the scenario or the action. Even down to the positions used, there's usually a strict pattern. Things aren't as clearly labeled as I would like. We all know it's not really "real", so make it easier for us to find our favorite stars. Some sites, like In the VIP, will feature 3-4 female performers, but they identify the scene by just one performer's name.
Bottom Line: I sounded awful harsh in the "cons" section to give this site a 94 really, but even with those faults, it's still what I consider to be the top network out there. I've kept a membership for probably 2 years running thanks to a hefty discount they offered upon cancellation that I decided was too good to pass up (though I hear that option is no longer available so don't be surprised if you don't get a similar offer).

Bottom line - if you don't care about variety in style or extremely well-acted "reality" scenarios, you'll be hooked on this network like I have been. If you're a collector of your favorite performer's scenes, you're likely to find one somewhere in this network, and quite possibly more than one place. There's so much here that it will literally take you months to download everything you want - and as someone else already mentioned, they do have measures in place to make sure of that (a download limit). However, I think the limit is flexible. I haven't hit it in a long time, and I know that for sure I have gone well over 1Gb downloading in one session without incident. Your mileage may vary, but I can't imagine anyone having too many gripes about dropping the cash for a one month membership to this network. I consider it a "must join".

04-11-07  06:55pm

Replies (0)
Visit Ashlee Exposed

Ashlee Exposed

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Ashlee has been a well-known softcore model for a few years - she finally puts out some hardcore stuff in this website, though it's all just BJ's!

* The content that is available looks good in high-resolution.

* Access to 4 other sites with a membership to this one.
Cons: * Ads for other websites all over the place

* Pet peeve of mine - all 5-6 of the BJ vids start abruptly with no build-up or talking or anything at all. They're all POV too.

* One picset and one video update since 11/07.

* Vids are short.
Bottom Line: This was a disappointing site for me. I had seen Ashlee in several of her previous sites (allashlee.com, ashleeandserena.com, hdbadgirls.com, etc) and was excited to see she was putting out a site with some hardcore stuff. Unfortunately, it's the most basic, easy to shoot hardcore you can find. The vids start with her already on her knees, sometimes already in the act. And since they're all in POV style, there's just no variety. Her other non-bj vids look a lot better, and feel a bit more complete, but I still felt like I expected more. Her previous sites all had a lot more personality to them. This one is just very basic and bland.

As for the content - 21 high res picsets, 6 picsets of vidcaps, 22 vids (although several of them are part1 or part2 of one episode - probably about 15 total different scenes).

The site isn't updated anymore, and I can't really recommend it unless you're a big fan of Ashlee who really wants to see her on her knees or just wants to complete your Ashlee archive. Sadly, you'll get a lot more Ashlee for your money with a trip to allashlee.com.

05-31-08  03:43pm

Replies (0)
Visit Brandi Belle

Brandi Belle

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: * Lots of variety - Brandi is good at changing the "theme" of each encounter

* Always interesting when she brings her "friends" in for an episode, as many of the guests are pretty hot.

* She's not your typical porn-star and more than any hardcore site, this one really does feel kinda girl-next door.

* The vids look good, and they arrive faithfully every week, meaning there's now a lot of content to be seen here (around 100 episodes I'd say)
Cons: * Very penis-oriented, with several updates featuring penis-measuring or guessing contests...kinda wierd, but will surely float someone's boat.

* Brandi isn't the most enthusiastic sexual performer. She doesn't seem like the porno-type, and sometimes seems a little lost in the action.

* Also not a very great actress - lots of opportunity on this site to show personality, but it falls flat sometimes, though it is still cute.

* A few too many handjob movies
Bottom Line: The look of this site is a dead giveaway that it is a bangbros-produced site, and it kinda shows in the high quality. They've obviously done things write with their popular Oxpass network, and so they've carried a lot of the production values and layout over to Brandi's site, and it makes for a very easy navigation. Plus you can always count on updates to continue coming each week.

One more negative to add to my list above - there's not a direct download link for her vids. I'd like to be able to right-click and "save as" but it doesn't work that way here, at least not in Firefox.

I don't know if she really writes the text that go along with her updates, but it really adds to the theme of the site, which is a girl-next-door and her sexual adventures. As I mentioned above, Brandi isn't always the most enthusiastic girl during sex, but her vids are done in a way that there's almost always something new to see in every vid. Her tour is great - I think it shows you exactly what to expect when you buy a membership, and once you're in, it doesn't disappoint. This site is about as good as you're going to get if you're looking for a single-model site of a young girl who actually does boy-girl scenes. I highly recommend it if you fit that bill, but take a look at the tour first to make sure it's up your alley.

10-07-07  04:05pm

Replies (0)
Visit Brooke Marks

Brooke Marks

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: * Personality abounds here - some very "entertaining" content

* Decent number high-res videos up that look pretty good

* Updates fairly often, though seemingly not on any set schedule.

* You get access to camshows by several other models (including Misty Gates and Blue-eyed Cass among others)
Cons: * Content is 99.8% non-nude minus the very occasional nip-slip - but as long as you know that going in it shouldn't count against her much.

* Pics aren't easy to download - you have to right-click each one to save it.
Bottom Line: Brooke's site is very easy to like if you're into the super-hot non-nude model thing. It's not usually my favorite style of site, but occasionally I find one that looks good, and in this case, it worked out. Brooke is as hot as they come, and her site is full of her silly personality. She takes nothing very seriously here, except the quality of her site. You can tell she has taken the time to put together some funny stuff, and it gives you a pretty good insight into her personality. At the same time, there's still plenty of the normal stripteases, dances, and teasing going on here. A lot of her camshows have been archived into her video section, which is always a nice bonus.

I'm guessing her site may have been more active at one time. Updates do still happen from week to week in the form of a picset or video, but camshows seem to be fairly rare unfortunately. However, it's definitely not a neglected site, and that is a very welcome thing these days.

Bottom line - I give it an 85 based on Brooke's hotness, her silly personality which bleeds throughout her site, and the high-quality pic and video sets which make up the bulk of her content. If you are looking for a good non-nude solo-model site, this one should be high on your list!

03-23-08  08:11pm

Replies (0)
Visit Brooke Skye

Brooke Skye

Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: 1) Quantity - Right now up to episode 192, plus a few bonus un-numbered "thank you" and "member request" videos.

2) Quality - Videos are mostly of the highest quality at 1280x720. 5 different bandwidth options if you're not as big a stickler for clarity. Even the 3rd
"high" option looks good at 640x480.

3) Brooke - Completely and utterly amazing looking girl. Even better is that this is not what I would consider a "tease" site. Brooke puts those fingers to good use in over half the vids.
Cons: Hmm...hard to find a problem with this site. There are some ads on the front page and after you log in. You don't get to choose your own username/password. Picture and Video episodes are not separated. Some vids (maybe 1/4 of them - and some of those are self-made vids by brooke with a decent webcam) don't have the HD option.
Bottom Line: This is nearly what I'd consider the perfect solo girl site...

Hot girl? Check!
Some steamy girl-girl action? Check!
A little hardcore mixed in? No...damn!
Lots of vids? Check!
HD quality? Check!
Consistently Updating? Check!
Multi-site access to other solo girl sites? Check!
Discounted price? Check!

I know Brooke has done hardcore before. It doesn't really fit the theme of her site, but if she managed to toss a couple of scenes in there, I'd consider this the perfect site.

04-20-07  02:07pm

Replies (1)
Visit Chloe 18

Chloe 18

Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: * As with most of the sites in this network - super-hot, shy-acting, young-looking teen who likes to masturbate a lot on camera
* Decent number of scenes for a site the doesn't update anymore (about 33)
* Well-shot photos with a lot of varied poses
* Seems to really get into her scenes and forget the camera is there - makes for some hot action
Cons: * No more updates
* Low quality vids by today's standards (768kbps)
* Vids split into 6 clips, even though most are only 7-8 minutes once joined (and they don't seem to join very well for whatever reason).
* Fairly useless extras
Bottom Line: I feel like I'm repeating myself in my reviews of most of these solo-girl sites. I've joined them all several times to pick up any updates I didn't have, so there's obviously things about these girls I really like. I love sites with cute young girls masturbating - and that's what this is. Chloe's site, like the others, is all about being cute and teenish. Her site is one of my favorites because she really seems to get into the action in her scenes.

The main negatives would be that it's an archive site (and has been for over a year) and the vids are low quality. I've often wondered why webmasters to sites like these don't go back to their original masters and redo the vids at a higher bitrate. I know I'd be there day 1 to get the new high-quality versions of these vids. Seems it would be a good marketing tool, but instead they seem to like advertising these sites as if they were still living-breathing-updating sites.

As far as recommendations go - I wouldn't, unless you're taking advantage of http://www.allteenrevpass.com and getting access to all of the sites in this network. None of them are updating anymore, so they're all really just good for a month's membership. I happen to think it would be money decently spent, as long as you don't expect updates or HD-vids.

11-11-07  07:48pm

Replies (0)
Visit College Fuck Fest

College Fuck Fest

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Site is (or at least used to be) fairly unique in that you have a lot of sex that happens in front of a crowd of rowdy drunken college students.

* They've gone back through their catalog and updated the vids to meet today's bitrate standards(2000k, 400x300 - yes the resolution is lacking a bit but they do look good).

* For a couple of years, there wasn't much new coming from this site, but lately they're adding new content once again and it fits right in with the old.
Cons: * Vids contain a lot of party footage in addition to the sex, so they can be kind of large (500-700 MB sometimes), but this really isn't a big negative.

* Pics are just screencaps, but honestly they're obviously not the focus here.

* Not all of their old content has survived - some of the older stuff has disappeared. Seems like there has always been right around 60 scenes available for download.
Bottom Line: The "reality-porn" genre isn't really my reviewing specialty, but since I do join these sites on occasion, I thought I'd pass my observations along.

I *think* this was the first paysite I ever joined several years ago, and really not a lot has changed here. While some networks have steadily added more content often at the rate of 1 scene a week, this one has always had about 60 episodes. If you joined several years ago, there will be new stuff here, but not a whole lot of it. Thankfully, they are updating with new stuff once again, but a lot of the girls are ones you may recognize from 4-5 years ago. Like most reality sites, the girls are actually professionals like you might see on a Bangbros site or Realitykings, but they do add a bit of reality by filming the scenes in a party setting, which does feel pretty genuine and makes things a bit more interesting at times. The production values are fine and the content looks good, so there's not a lot to complain about, other than the lack of growth. If you ask me, it's definitely worth a look if you've never joined before and are interested in the genre. You do get access to the rest of the sites on the network, which is a great bonus, although many of the bonus sites either no longer update or are simply scenes ripped from DVDs.

08-26-07  09:17pm

Replies (0)
Visit Craving Carmen

Craving Carmen

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: * Video Quality - Things look really nice here if you go with the highest resolution vids.

* Vids are offered in multiple bitrates so you can download a lower bitrate version if you have a slow connection or don't care for the highest resolution.

* Carmen - She's definitely a hottie, and you get to get to see all of her. There are a couple of amateur-looking BJ vids on the site, but most of the fare here is solo or girl-girl.

* Camshows - Several archived solo shows to d/l
Cons: * A couple of the vids are split into episodes, which (gasp!) are split among 2 sites. One girl-girl scene is actually split into I think 7 parts, with 4 on Carmen's site, and the rest on Barbie's. I hate upsells.

* Non-nude vids - There are 64 vids here, but several of them are multi-part, and her older stuff is non-nude (about half).

* Picsets are not easy to navigate and as usual, no zipset options. I didn't bother due to inconvenience.

* No vid updates in a long time.
Bottom Line: It's hard to give this site too high of a rating. nabbed a membership way back when the site first started over a year ago and saw enough promise that it made me want to come back again. Unfortunately, she was on episode 62 when my membership ended the first time and is on episode 64 now. The number of camshows hasn't grown significantly either, and she really touts her camshows as a big reason to join her site on the tour.

I know a lot of people prefer picsets too, and hers will prove frustrating with no good download options. The thumbnails span multiple pages (sometimes 10-15) and each one must be nabbed individually.

All that said, despite the site's shortcomings, Carmen is still super hot, and a lot of her personality does show in her videos and archived camshows. She seems to have a lot of fun in her shoots, and that's refreshing when you compare her to some models who seem disinterested or bored. Her girl-girl scenes with Barbie are extremely hot, and it's a shame you'd have to purchase a membership to Barbie's site in order to see the whole things - I'm sure some people will, but Barbie's look just doesn't do it for me...sorry :(

With the lack of updates, I'm gonna have to suggest that this is a one-time one-month membership at best. As it stands, there's not much reason to join again.

05-26-07  02:37pm

Replies (2)
Visit Cute Tanya

Cute Tanya

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Access to other sites in the network
* A few video options (full vid mpeg, clips in wmv, etc)
* Bleh I can't even think of a third.
Cons: * Content on the tour is not found in the site. The tour implies that there are 9 vids available, while there are only 5.
* The content that is found in the site (only 5 vids) is weak and low quality.
* 51 pages of un-galleried pics makes for very un-friendly usage.
* Does not appear to be updating (at least not in the 3 weeks that I have been a member).
Bottom Line: Yet another site in this network that just appears to be severely misrepresented by its tour. Site is accessed after logging in by clicking on her site's thumbnail from the network's portal site. From there, you are offered her 5 video sets, which consist of her mostly fully clothed dancing around and doing some teasing. The tour shows a screenshot of a vid titled "My BF Pops" which looks like the uh...end of a lapdance, but the vid isn't on the site. It's stuff like this that just frustrates me to no end on some sites. Add to this the fact that there have been no changes to the site since I've joined and it's not a good formula. Oh and if you're a pic fan, you're probably going to be just as frustrated in that section, as there are no easy ways to download any of the pics. You have to click on the thumb of the pic, then right-click/download, which is annoying enough when the pics are all in a single gallery. When you have 51 pages of 20 pics apiece that aren't organized into galleries, it's even worse.

I don't recommend this site unless you just wanna pop in for a quick look while visiting one of the other sites on the network. Don't let the tour fool you!

12-10-07  09:28pm

Replies (0)
Visit Dream Kelly

Dream Kelly

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Kelly herself would be the biggest "pro" this site has. Of course it's opinion, but she's one of the best looking porn girls out there, and she doesn't disappoint with extra shyness. The second best thing would be the newest videos. She just recently started adding some hi-res videos that look head and shoulders better than her old ones (mentioned in "cons" below). Pictures are solid, but they're not usually what draws me to a site so I won't comment too strongly either way.
Cons: The older videos are horrible quality. 296kb encoded wmvs do not look good on today's larger monitors. I had been a member once before, but decided there was no way I'd join again unless the video quality got much better. Thankfully it did, but the majority of the content is not up to today's standards. The site also seems to die on me sometimes for about 5 minutes (flood protection? I'm not downloading THAT fast lol!)
Bottom Line: If you're not concerned about getting an overwhelming amount of high-quality video content and you think Kelly is a hottie, you should enjoy her site. It's very corporate, with zero interaction from Kelly herself, but some of that can be excused due to the content, which is undergoing a marked improvement. I wouldn't necessarily say join today (only 4 HQ videos up so far), but I'd keep an eye on the site and plan on a visit in a few months once they've had time to fill out the poor content with more modern multimedia. Score of 79 puts it right on the verge of "recommended".

04-09-07  03:10pm

Replies (3)
Visit Dream Taylor

Dream Taylor

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Cute girl who doesn't tease you to death - there are some nice full sex scenes here

* Some of the vids are decent resolution at 1000kbps+ and 720x480.

* Despite its relative newness, there is a decent amount of content at 8 video scenes (4 of which feature boy-girl action) and 13 photosets.

* You get access to all of the sites in the Minxxx Studios network.

* 2-day trial is full access.
Cons: * Photos are only medium resolution (800x600 or so) and there are no zip files to be found here.

* Site organization didn't seem to be a priority. Everything is linked from the front page. There aren't separate sections for picsets or videos. If the site grows large (I hope!), it will get cumbersome to navigate.

* Video format isn't uniform throughout the site - there are a few that are lower-res mpg only. Also, some are offered as a full download while others must be grabbed in parts. Some offer both options. Really a mixed bag. Almost looks like the site was put together with content that was already shot and used elsewhere.
Bottom Line: Dream Taylor has a look that I like, and when I see one of these new sites pop up with a young hottie like her, I usually can't resist taking a look. All in all I was pleased with the content, knowing it's a pretty new site. If it (and the rest of the sites on the network) keeps growing, then I think it will be a pretty worthwhile purchase for someone who is into solo teen sites.

As it stands, there wasn't a lot to complain about the site, but there wasn't a lot that was worthy of excessive praise, so I thought a 75 (Average) score pretty much describes it perfectly. With a little TLC and some growth, I could see the score increasing significantly. The network isn't great, but I'll be keeping my eye on it and watching for some general improvements.

04-18-08  07:42pm

Replies (0)
Visit GND Cali

GND Cali

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Decent number of picture sets (43 so far) at good resolution.

* Zip files for all photo sets in both low and high resolution options.

* The videos that are there look pretty good at 640x480.

* Cali is pretty hot, and she does appear to be somewhat active in the site. She posts blogs and will allegedly be doing camshows soon, but we've all heard that before (from other models).
Cons: * Video content is very slim so far - just 4 vids - one is an interview and another is her doing her toenails (boring!) A screencap on her tour showed the filename was set39.avi - unfortunately that didn't mean there were 39 vids like I assumed!

* Several non-nude sets sprinkled in to the mix, not to mention that none of the content really goes beyond topless. I hate when a tour doesn't tell you that!

* Only other feature of note (if you subscribe to JUST cali's site) is access to the forums, which I'm not bothering to join (they want you to email them with your username and real name - what's wrong with registration?).

* Pet peeve - can't choose your own login info. It becomes more of a problem if you subscribe to the multi-site option since it asks you for a password somewhere between a billion and a zillion times as you change sites.
Bottom Line: This site isn't all bad, though I definitely think I focused more on the bad than the good. I paid the extra 10 bucks to get the multi-site access, and I kind of regret that I did, because the story here is the story throughout all of the sites. Content is non-nude to topless in all but a few cases, and only the solo girls have videos (I'll probably review 1-2 of the others at least). Once I joined, I realized it wasn't really the type of site I really care for. It's overly tease-oriented and picture-focused. I much prefer a video-focused softcore-hardcore type of site.

I hate randomly generated user/pass combos. That means I have to write it down or store it someplace I can easily look it up and copy/paste into the login form (I don't like using the browser to memorize passwords if possible). That's annoying.

The theme of this network of sites is girl-next-door types of models who submit their own content to the webmaster to post on their behalf. Thus it will only be as good as the models who are submitting content. It looks like they just got on their feet, so that's an explanation for why the content level is so low so far. That excuse won't work for too long though. I'd wait a couple of months to check this site (and its sister sites) out unless you really like Cali's look and prefer soft/topless content.

07-25-08  12:14pm

Replies (0)
Visit Haylee Hunter

Haylee Hunter

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Nice looking blondie here, and she isn't afraid to drop her drawers and show off the good stuff. However you should note that you're not (yet) going to see a lot of solo play here - mostly tease.

* Trial is full access as far as I can tell

* Images are fairly high-res (1500x1000 or so)

* Site includes camshows, forum, live show archive, extra (useless) feeds, wishlist, bio - all the stuff you would expect in a solo site.
Cons: * You can't download the vids - they're streaming only. And to top it off, they're fairly low res

* Site is new, so not a lot of content up yet (8 vids, 1 camshow archive, 30 galleries).

* No zipsets or direct links to images, meaning you have to click each picture to get a link to save it with.
Bottom Line: I like to believe that webmasters do their research before designing a site. I can't imagine that cheesy tactics like making vids stream-only or making pics hard to save end up making people stay as members longer. Personally - as soon as I see those types of things, I start looking for a cancel link.

I'd give more info on the 8 vids currently on the site, but they pop up in their own window with right click disabled and they weren't worth playing with any longer to figure it out. I've got a lot of methods and programs I've figured out over the years on how to save a streaming video, but try as I might, I couldn't snag these. As a personal "policy", I don't join sites that don't let me keep the content, so I canceled my trial here pretty quickly. Thankfully, the trial was full-access, so I could see what I was potentially getting into.

Despite these site-killing negatives (for me at least), Haylee is a hottie! The action can be a little tame, but I checked out her 30-minute camshow in the archives, and things were a little hotter in there. If she turns up the heat a bit in her future content and lets members save her vids, this could be a pretty hot site. However, I don't want to have to wait for buffering every time I skip ahead in a vid, so the streaming-only thing just kills this site for me. Not recommended for someone like me, but I'm sure it will more than suffice for some.

08-26-07  08:58pm

Replies (0)
Visit I Dream Of Erica

I Dream Of Erica

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Erica is super-hot and has a cute southern accent!

* High-res pictures look good

* Vids offered in several bitrates, and they look pretty good for the most part!

* Cam shows are archived (though there's only 5 so far)

* As of 5/30, you get access to 4 other sites as well (Barely18barbie, youreroticparadise, love-abbie, and ashleexposed).
Cons: * Not a lot of vids and they're pretty short and tame in some cases.

* Update schedule is sketchy - just one update since 5/13 (about 17 days ago) - for a newer site that is worrysome.

* According to forums, Erica has been a no-show for several scheduled camshows, which is also a bad sign.
Bottom Line: Erica's site currently has 5 webcam archives, 6 "cam" vids, and 11 high-def vids. For picsets, 14 cam sets, 11 high-res photoshoots, and 3 sets of candids. It's not a lot of content, but what is there certainly looks good. The majority of the content is soft nude stuff, with only a couple of the vids having any real solo-play action. Personally, I like my solo-girl sites to be a little harder, but it will cater well to those who like their softcore stuff to be more on the teasy side.

The biggest problem I see is that the site is already showing signs of neglect. Honestly, I've been a member of several of the webmaster's other sites in the past, and they all seem to build up a little bit of content, then they're done forever. A quick look around at some of the other sites you get access to will show the same, as none of them seem to have gotten much bigger than erica's site is currently. Hopefully I'm wrong, because I think Erica is absolutely beautiful, and after going through all the content that's currently there, I'm dying to see more. Unfortunately, given the track record of other sites from this company, I just don't expect much. I recommend it only if you're dying to see what content Erica has up currently or are interested in a couple of the other sites you get access to.

05-31-08  03:20pm

Replies (0)
Visit Jenni Apples

Jenni Apples

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Jenni is hot - resembles porn star Addison Rose kinda
* Access granted to additional sites
* A few video options (full vid mpeg, clips in wmv, etc)
Cons: Where to start...
* Only 5 vids, of which none are great and all are low quality (570k? Come on this is 2007!)
* Vids from tour are left out of site
* Picture section is the least convenient I've ever seen - 44 pages of 20 pics apiece, not divided into sets.
* No updates in the 3 weeks since I've joined
* Action seems cut short in all of the vids on the site, and unfortunately it's before much good happens.
Bottom Line: This is the kind of site that just makes you angry when you join. It's another case of a beautiful girl with an attractive tour who probably has nothing to do with how her content is presented to the public. As a result, you get a tiny, disorganized site, with very few redeeming qualities. I literally can't imagine anyone joining this site and feeling like they got their money's worth.

Upon joining, you'll be taken to a portal page to access all of the company's sites (including other solo girls like Kelli Young and Mandy Michaels). I'll warn you though - many of those sites are just like this one, with 5 sets and no organization among the picture galleries. I may be wrong, but I would not expect this site to ever update beyond what is out there now.

One other thing to note - I had horrible problems with the site accepting my login for the first few days. I could navigate to 2-3 pages in a row, then another login box would pop up, and my correct info would fail. Finally after a few days it worked itself out, but it was highly frustrating.

Bottom line - don't join this site unless you've got a super hard-on for Jenni Apples. There's just not enough content, and not enough effort put into the site to make it worth the cash.

12-10-07  09:01pm

Replies (1)
Visit Jenny Heart

Jenny Heart

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Jenny would be about the only pro here. The site is designed fairly well too for browsing. There are plenty of photosets and videos of Jenny doing everything from friendly interviews to bouncing on some pole. Cameraman/woman does a good job at getting some unique views of the "situations" to keep the videos interesting.
Cons: Video quality is horrendous - just about the worst I've seen from any sites lately. They are 320x240, but other sites handle even that low resolution better than this network does. It's a shame because the content of the videos looks like it would be great. The pics look much nicer, and the action is hot, but there's no way to download them beyond clicking on each one. I can't imagine many people will take the time to save each one individually to make a set. Convenience is key!
Bottom Line: I can't really recommend this unless someone is just dying to see Jenny's content. She really is a great looking girl, and her sex scenes are in some ways better than many others I've seen come out of the major porn studios - I'm not a big fan of the "let's spend 90% of the move in 20x zoom mode" porn that's out there, and thankfully this site doesn't try to do that. Although there's a good number of pics and videos here, I think the site as a whole is missing a lot of small convenience and quality things that will translate into a frustrating experience for the user. It's unfortunate, because Jenny is worthy of much better than what the site currently has to offer.

04-09-07  09:28pm

Replies (0)
Visit Jodi Bean

Jodi Bean

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Jodi is pretty hot. The videos are clear. Pictures are decent at 800x600ish quality. The site has a very FTV look to it, which I know a lot of people are familiar with. Navigation is easy.
Cons: The site claims to be "rich in member interaction", but there is none. Jodi has a blog with the last post being 1/3/07 (which from I think is about when the site was launched). The message board says "coming soon". And a pet peeve of mine, the videos start out with her already nude doin' her thing. Personally, I like a little tease before revealing all the goods, but that's just personal preference. One vid I downloaded was broken. There have been no updates since I joined (roughly 25 days ago)
Bottom Line: Check out the tour - if you like what you see there, that's what you're going to get inside. Don't expect a tease or a lot of buildup. Don't expect exceptional picture or video quality. Don't expect a frequent update schedule (at least not yet). But you can expect exactly what you see in the tour, just in much larger doses. My recommendation - unless you're really into Jodi, give this site a while to grow into itself.

04-09-07  08:17pm

Replies (0)
Visit Karen Dreams

Karen Dreams

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Site has lots of content. It has been running for 2-3 years now, and has steadily added material. It started as a strictly non-nude site but she's gotten more daring since and now gets nude, though you rarely get a peek at "the goods". Her content has evolved with technology, and the newest pics and videos are being released in high res formats. Large archive of cam vids is a bonus too, as is one ticket to spend on her more risque zipsets.
Cons: Nothing really bad here. If you don't like Karen, you obviously won't join the site. She did get breast implants a year or so ago, and I know that can affect people's opinions sometimes. Some might like to know that the pics tend to be a little less risque than the videos. It is mostly a softcore site, so don't expect to log in and find out what new toys Karen has been sitting on lately.
Bottom Line: While some sites claim to give you a glimpse into the life of their performers, it's rare that one actually accomplishes that like KarenDreams. She has loads of content, and it varies from week to week. A lot of sites fall into the "watch as I discover 95 ways to masturbate" niche, and while those can of course be great and interesting sites, it's refreshing to see one that sticks to its guns and really does allow the performer's personality to show through. The site will be a little tame for some, but that's ok. For those who don't need things to be too hardcore, I'm sure they'll find Karen's site to be entertaining.

04-09-07  08:49pm

Replies (0)
Visit Kelli Young

Kelli Young

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Videos are fairly decent at 1600kbps and 640x480
* Very cute girl with lots of photoshoot vids
* Plenty of photosets (120+)
* Access to a bunch of network sites - though none are really superb.
Cons: * Very basic members area - just a section for pics and one for vids.
* Site no longer updates - last date is Oct 23, 06
* No options to easily download pics. Must click on each and right click/download.
* All of the content - both vids and pics is nothing but Kelli posing for photoshoots. It gets pretty boring, but she is a cutie so it helps a bit.
* Very softcore - just some topless stuff here, nothing more explicit
Bottom Line: Kelli Young is a hottie with an average-sized archive of photoshoot pics and vids available. Unfortunately, that's about all there is to say. She's definitely a hottie, but the site doesn't give you an opportunity to learn anything about her or see her in any environment other than the confines of an apartment with a photographer. Thankfully, you do get access to a bunch of other sites, because I would be surprised if someone didn't get bored with most of the content here within a day or two.

As far as a recommendation - I'd give it a look if you are a member of one of the other sites on the network, but there's not really enough content or enough variety to make it worth an individual membership.

12-10-07  09:14pm

Replies (0)
Visit Kitty Karsen

Kitty Karsen

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Kitty is pretty, and she's got a decent amount of content up right now. She's very young looking, and does a decent amount of talking to the camera before getting down to more naughty business. Archived webcam chats are a nice bonus. She had about 20 hour-long shows up when I last visited. You also get access to other sites in her network, which are similar.
Cons: Can be a little overacted at times (let's be honest - how many of us really want to see her play marbles or roll around on a giant ball?), but then again I'm sure the goal is to provide variety among the different scenes instead of doing the normal strip - play with self - smile and wave goodbye. Video quality could be better in this day and age. I'd resub fairly quickly if she adopted a hi-res format. My bonus site access went away halfway through my month of membership. Not sure why.
Bottom Line: Kitty Karsen is a pretty good site. You won't see a lot of her own influence on the site outside of the webchats (hosted through the Camz network), but some people like myself don't really need that. There is a good amount of content to occupy your time with, although none of it is very high-resolution. If you're looking for HD-hotties, look elsewhere, but if you're looking for a young looking teen acting out some fun scenarios, Kitty's site should provide you with a good month of membership, and maybe more.

04-09-07  09:04pm

Replies (1)
Visit Kristina Wood

Kristina Wood

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Updates do happen, though irregularly and un-dated
- Videos look pretty good despite sub-1000k encoding.
- Kristina is a real hottie
- You get access to 2 other solo girl sites
Cons: - Only 36 sets, both of pics and videos
- Site is fairly devoid of personality.
- Camshows are done through Camz - this might not bother some people, but it usually ensures that chats will have > 100 people in them, most of who have no idea who the performer is. I'm sure it works well for the host, but definitely not a very "personal" feel. I don't even bother with cam shows through camz
- Several un-untilized portions of the site (auction, largely unused forum, small "candid shots" section)
Bottom Line: It's hard to choose what makes one site much better than another sometimes. There has to be something that makes the site unique or interesting, and this site just didn't do so for me. It wasn't that it didn't deliver what it promised, and it wasn't that Kristina wasn't a hottie (she is!) or did too much teasing and not enough getting down to business. I just haven't found myself navigating to the folder where I keep her vids on my hard drive. The quality doesn't match the best sites, there isn't much in the way of personality showing through - it's just another pretty girl getting naked and playing for the camera. As with most solo girl sites, it will likely appeal to you if you're into her, and it won't if you're not.

As for the action - there's not a lot of teasing. There is a good bit of playing. She has a few vids with a girlfriend of hers, but things don't get too hot and heavy - some assisted playing around, but never any hot girl-girl sexytime. Oh well!

Bottom line - worth a join if you're in need of a site to join and are really into Kristina. If I were deciding between a few sites though, I'd probably give the others a good hard look before subscribing here.

Tip - Kristina has a hardcore b/g scene at velvetectasy.com - of course nothing like that on her own site.

05-06-07  07:30pm

Replies (0)
Visit Lacey Little

Lacey Little

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * New site, but seems to have launched with an acceptable amount of content.

* Very helpful tour tells you how many pics/vids are on the site - and it's not lying!

* Cute model from somewhere in England it sounds like who does everything from tease sets to hardcore b/g.

* Picsets look good and there are plenty of pics in each set.

* Vids are offered in two quality levels and the lower quality actually looks decent. The high-res sets look better than their 640x480 resolution IMO.

* Access to 8 total sites with your membership
Cons: * No zip files for the picsets.

* Some surfers may be looking for more video options. Right now WMV is all there is, which is fine for me.

* Price is $5-10 too high. I'm usually happy to pay $24-29 for a site, and when that's what 90% of the other sites (networks too) out there are charging, it just seems hard to convince myself to spend the extra $5.

* Site is kind of basic and doesn't have much in the way of interaction. No blog, forum, chats, or anything like that right now.
Bottom Line: Nice! That was my first thought when I signed in for the first time. Really it's the first solo model site I've been very pleased with purchasing in a while. There is enough content to keep me interested for a while even though the site appears to be brand new. The main model and all her friends are hot. The vids and pics all look pretty good. The site shows signs of updating. The tour is honest - things aren't being advertised as "super HD quality" only to find something subpar inside.

Really an 85 is a pretty good score from me, and this one could be even higher if they add a few interactive features and drop the price $5. All in all I'm pleased, and I would recommend this site to anyone who finds Lacey and her friends as hot as I do.

12-01-08  09:01pm

Replies (4)
Visit Liberty Valentine

Liberty Valentine

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: * Model appears to be active in site, which is a good sign for longevity

* Good quality 720x480 vids with decent number available considering the relatively new age of the site

* Sexy British accent!

* Performs camshows on occasion
Cons: * Very teasy content - really mostly topless. Nothing pink to see yet (unless you buy an extra-cost zipset). This will be fine for some folks, but meant I was a bit bored.

* Extra-cost zipsets only available to members, which means if I decide I want to buy it in a couple of months, I'd have to join the site again

* Site is young, and at the current rate it will take a few months to build up content

* Pictures not zipped for easy download
Bottom Line: I gave this site a 79, which puts it in the "does some things good, some things poor", though I don't know that it really does anything poorly. I mean sure $24.95 seems a bit much right now for the 20ish vids and picsets that are available (an estimate - I was a member about a month ago and 16 were available), but the pics look good, the vids look good, and Libi looks great. There's just not a lot here just yet. It would be nice to see archived camshows, some longer and more revealing vids (with less of them being photoshoot vids), zip files for the picsets, and altogether just more sets of everything and this would be a pretty good site!

All in all, Liberty is a hottie, and her site appears to be in good working order for the time being. If she continues to build up content, I could see her site gaining popularity in the coming months. Hopefully she doesn't go the way of so many other solo models and stops updating before the site has a chance to be great.

My one big gripe would be the extra-cost zipsets. These are always disappointing to me because it usually means that you're not likely to see content in her paysite that is more revealing than what is in the zipset. I know a lot of models probably make some good cash off of that trick (the "spunky" and phil-flash sites sure have enough of them that they must be profitable), but my porn budget, while probably above average, still doesn't usually allow me the luxury of a $39.99 charge for what usually amounts to a single set of photos with usually a short vid attached. Peachez is a good example of a model who has established a pattern with her site's normal content, but sprinkles in some wilder stuff on occasion. She has resisted the urge to go the zipset route, and her fans still clamor desperately for her next wild video to come out. Liberty Valentine could do the same, and I think her site would catch my interest a little more. As it stands, I have to recommend that you wait a month or two to let some content build up before you join, and know ahead of time that the content is going to be pretty soft, with expensive upsells to the more interesting stuff. If you're ok with that, you just might love Liberty Valentine.

08-04-08  07:09pm

Replies (0)
Visit Little April

Little April

Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: * April does the "young and innocent" thing very well.
* Decent amount of content for a site that has stopped updating (49 episodes available at the moment)
* Picsets, though short, have nice variety and are well-shot.
Cons: * Vids are a bit overacted - a bit hard to believe that we're gonna watch her spontaneously switch from playing a video game to masturbation
* Inexplicably has rotated vids for the last couple of years - it's an archive site...just put them all out there!
* Obviously - it's not updating anymore
* Vids are poor quality for this day and age (768kbps) and aren't available in full scenes
Bottom Line: Little April was the first solo-girl site I ever joined, and I think I actually joined the first day I stumbled across her site. She's super-hot and just had something about her that drew me in. Unfortunately though, by the time I joined, the "new" updates were already over and the site's operators were rotating the scenes out. I *think* my collection is about 55-60 scenes total, but the site has never had more than 40-45 of them up at one time. That could be an annoyance to anyone trying to complete a collection.

The scenes are also somewhat overacted sometimes. Seriously - we know the girl is 18, and she acts ridiculously young in some of the scenes, much like her network-mate Teen Topanga. The vids are nice in content, but a little lacking in variety, and definitely lacking in quality by today's standards. Most are in 6 1-2 minute clips, though some are only 3 clips. They come in 5 different quality ranges, but the highest quality is only 768kbps, which is not great.

As far as recommendations go, I don't usually recommend sites that don't update anymore, but if you're getting access to all of the sites in the network (join from here - http://www.allteenrevpass.com ) then it's worth a look. None of those sites stand up well on their own since none are updating, but as a package, you can get a lot of fairly decent stuff for a decent price.

11-11-07  07:26pm

Replies (1)

Shown : 1-25 of 38 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.15 seconds.