| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from bitterfish:
(pornwatcher's Reply)
I'm pretty much the same way - my own room, with a locked door and headphones. After 9-10 PM, it's pretty much a given that I'm sealed off in my "masturbatorium" until I go to sleep :P.
|
01-21-11 09:58pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from graymane:
(pornwatcher's Reply)
"use it as my masturbatorium."
Priceless, pornwatcher.....simply a masterful title to discribe our little dens of Iniquity.
This goes off to Webster publishers first thing in the morning.
|
01-18-11 05:36pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from BadMrFrosty:
(pornwatcher's Reply)
Very true, most sites have ~3mbit/s 720P and ~5mbit/s 1080P videos. At those resolutions the bitrate needs to be at the very least 5mbit/s for 720P and 12 mbit/s for 1080P otherwise there is no point in having such a high res and can actually be worse than lower res / higher bitrate videos. What is even more annoying is when sites provide videos in 720P which are obviously upscaled from DVD which is a complete waste of disk space / bandwidth.
|
04-08-10 01:56am
|
Reply
4
|
Hands on Hardcore
(2)
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Review
from pat362:
I wouldn't have given them a score of 90 but that's because I have been a member more than once of this site. The last time was in September. This site is not really updating with brand new material but re-editing older material. You review was quite good. I'm sure you will have many more to offer us has the weeks go by. I hope you want to join their network in the future but I certainly won't. Most of their sites are no longer updating with new material or they don't update as often.
|
12-29-09 05:46pm
|
Reply
5
|
Hands on Hardcore
(2)
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Review
from Drooler:
In 2009, there are 4-5 updates per month except for June (3 updates) and August (two). Wouldn't be a score of 90 if it were me.
|
12-29-09 06:32am
|
Reply
6
|
Hands on Hardcore
(2)
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Review
from Denner:
Fine first review - welcome to PU, pornwatcher!
Just a remark - and not crtisicm:
You give the site a score of 90 and still have some - very relevant cons, btw - of average video quality - agree, at least about the earlier shoots - and the duplicates from other DDF-sites. Another one from this user: The vast amount of re-edited older material.
Anyway: Good to have a new serious PU among us...the score is always a matter of opinion, but a well founded review is more important.
|
12-29-09 05:56am
|
