Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Simon Scans
(1)
|
Reply of
pantycleft's Comment
from Simon of Scans:
"Very little subtlety, very little tantalising, very little reality - just pink, pink, pink all the way."
Sorry, that's just not true. We shot long sets, we have sets where the tease portion alone is longer than the entire set on other sites. - Plus our girls end up doing the porn!
But tease isn't what we're about, and I won't even begin to apologise for shooting porn that's rude.
New models never really get the tease thing anyway, they're often not that good at it, but bored old old pros, they can drag out taking their pants down for 2 hours while making it look "real".
The "reality" is, once a girl wants to get naked, it won't take long. :)
|
12-12-08 06:38am
|
Reply
2
|
Simon Scans
(1)
|
Reply of
pantycleft's Comment
from Denner:
Thanks to pantycleft for the "beware"
I enjoy solo-girls a lot - but all that close-ups in "the gynaecology-way" do not get me off.....
I've thought about this site, but you can afford them all - and it does not look that exciting.
Is it anywhere near Nubiles or Teendreams - solo-wise?
|
08-16-07 08:49am
|
Reply
3
|
Simon Scans
(1)
|
Reply of
pantycleft's Comment
from Drooler:
I'm with pantycleft on this. Simon really overdoes it with the toys and long series of ever so minutely varying insertion shots. There are other aspects of the girls he should give more attention to, especially their lovely behinds!
It's kind of tragic when everything else is so good but one thing -- here, constant "toy obsession" -- makes it a bore.
|
03-11-07 01:37am
|
Reply
4
|
Simon Scans
(1)
|
Reply of
pantycleft's Comment
from wishdj:
Well said! You are referring to people like me who love gynaecology like poses!
Only problem with this site is that I don't like the way the photographer blurrs the models face when they expose their private parts.
|
03-06-07 05:07am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(pantycleft's Reply)
Yes, saw that notice .. which is why they'll be deactivating the listing. Again, thanks for the heads up.
|
02-13-07 01:22pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(pantycleft's Reply)
As an aside to pantycleft ...
Thanks for the heads up about the onlylooking site, our editors will deactivate their listing.
|
02-13-07 09:49am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 1.75 seconds.
|
|
