Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
chiefman's Review
from SimonSubAms:
Hi chiefman, thanks for your review.
All feedback is welcome so that the site can continue to improve including being active on the members message board, we shoot many sets and models that are requested on there.
The videos aren't amateur as such they're more British glamour with the girls acting out fantasy situations to full orgasm.
I can tell you the girls definately have fun on the shoots.
The videos are pretty big files, especially the newer ones which are being shot in HD and uploaded as HD WMVs, it does mean they take a bit longer to download but we've found the quality more than makes up for it. I did think about also cutting the files up into sections but with speeds getting faster it can only get better.
The site did start with us shooting amateur girls but as it's moved on we now have to book semi-pro models or we wouldn't have enough girls for daily updates. Likewise the photography has moved on from the original amateur, poor lighting thing to a more glamour feel. It's one photographer and he's moved on from being an enthusiast to a pro, now shooting for many top shelf mens mags.
Every set and video from day 1 is still up and will stay up, no rotating it in and out like you see elsewhere.
As for the price it's no more expensive than sites that give you 10% of what we have... 100 girls, 200,000+ photos, 200+ videos, all exclusively shot for the site and growing daily. Then you get access to Suburban Sluts with masses of content along with 5 other sites that have stacks of the amateur material you're looking for.
Anyway, thanks for your thoughts. I'd like to keep everyone happy with every aspect of the site but with 1,000's of users that's never going to be possible.
Happy hunting :)
Webmaster at Suburban Amateurs dot com
|
10-22-07 04:10pm
|
Reply
2
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
chiefman's Review
from Drooler:
Thanks for the review/update. I was a member in March 2005, and from your review I see that nothing of substance has really changed. (They have done a makeover on the visitor's pages.)
Definitely agree that the posing is dull. And repetitious in one set after another. Boring as all get out. Somehow I guess they figure they've got the right formula.
One plus might be more responsible webmastering (?). When I was there, they didn't even have a whole month's worth of past updates available (Nov. '04). Click the link and "404." And elsewhere, thumbs were empty "Xs" in some galleries.
|
10-16-07 02:15pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
