Thanks for this, I know how to do about.config on Firefox, but hadn't even thought about that. I will give it a try.
The problem seems to just be on .wmv video files. It picks up .rar or .zip files fine and also .mp4 files. When I download a .wmv file, the dialog box has a tick box for "Do this always for this type of file", but it's inactive on the .wmv files so you can't check it. I may try installing an older version of Firefox and see if that changes it. Thanks again.
I would guess a little of all. There are some photographers that you can pick out just by the model's poses. DDF almost always has at least a couple in every set of the model standing on her tiptoes, back arched and none of them look comfortable in that pose.
"With Erotic Destinations at times it felt like I was supposed to be admiring the location more than the model."
Don't feel too bad. I once found a vacation spot from their sets! I always like seeing nice scenery as the backdrop, but I want to say, "There's pretty trees back there behind the model". Some of Erotic Destinations settings left me saying, "There was a naked woman in that picture?"
I know we've had some laughs over the years about my tidiness. I remember badandy making me cringe talking about his collection of "new folder" folders. My recent problem is that I got a new PC. For some reason, several sites have something in their script that will not let me left-click/one-click to download a file to a specified folder. This only happens in Firefox. I have even found plugins and addons that are supposed to fix it, but they don't.
Over the last month or so, I have been using Chrome for downloading since it doesn't have the problem. I just create a site folder, folders for each model I want to download, then go through "save all downloads to" specify the model, download everything that model has on the site I'm on.
Ones that I liked:
Simony Diamond with near platinum blonde on DDF. I think Simony's hair color and style has changed enough that she overrides any hair style or color change.
Anetta Keys with blonde on several sites. Similar to Simony, Anetta had very dark to a light brown with blonde highlights then jumped all the way to blonde. Maybe that's some kind of easing us in method?
Zuzana Zelinova with red, I had seen her blonde for so long and the few early brunette sets, the red, mostly used on DDF was a really nice change. Also worth noting her body seemed to change with the red hair too since she was getting older than the slim, cute model she started out as with blonde/brunette.
One that did a like and dislike:
Sandra Shine started with the brunette look and it wasn't that good because she is light complected. She went to the much more known reddish brown and I thought that looked near perfect on her, so there's the like change, but then she went to blonde and I didn't care for it.
One that I disliked:
April Flowers from blonde to brunette. I usually prefer brunette, but the blonde had become a big part of April's look and she seemed to lose something when she went brunette.
I do but don't think I even realize it's there since the yellow bar pops up at the top that tells me it blocked a pop-up. I usually can't get the cursor arrow to it before it disappears. I also think it's a bit ironic that a pop-up blocker pops up a message saying it blocked a pop-up.
I have Charter. The speed I pay for is 30 MB/s and when I test it on speedtest.net, I get between 20 MB/s to 32 MB/s depending on which server I connect to.
On sites that I download from, I have been maxing out at 2-2.5 MB/s. I'm happy with that. I still remember the days of loading up 10 Eve Angel photo zipsets and letting my dial-up access run all night just to download 10 photo sets. I do think Charter is advertising a 100 MB/s connection, but it's $110 per month.
Can't say I haven't had one or a couple before, but I don't have one now or intend on getting one in the future. I do collect knives and swords though, mostly from the Far Eastern cultures. As for defense, I keep a basket with baseballs in it and dare anyone to try and dodge them!
I'm kind of surprised that I picked this but poor preview. I have said I'm going to join Wicked Pictures for over a year now, but still haven't because of the lack of a full model list in their preview and now their price went up so they fell another few spots for me. I can see how much the poor preview hurts based on I would still join with the higher price if they let me see all the models they have. I also learned over the last year to watch for wording in previews, especially of solo sites, like "hundreds of photos" instead of "hundreds of photo sets".
I'll add another possible answer that I have been using, "No facts info on TBP". I always check TBP on sites I haven't joined before. I ran into two different issues with this one. One site that had removed a lot of their content in comparison to the numbers they had when TBP visited it. One site that had no TBP facts that ended up having no zips,and no video downloads.
I couldn't believe it Denner, but Tera was married to the guy you're talking about. I think he uses the name Spyder or Spider in porn, but his name away from porn is Evan Seinfeld. He was in a New York hardcore punk band called Biohazard for years, not for sure if they still make music or not. I have never been able to stomach a scene with him and Tera, even though Tera is one of my all-time favorites. I think Tera met him when she almost became involved with rapper/singer Everlast. Check out Everlast's video, "I can't move" on youtube for a beautiful view of dressed Tera. One of her sexiest works I've seen and it's not even porn.
I do but it's not a big difference. If a site would be an 83 but has a low price, it will bounce up to maybe 85-86. If it has a high price, it will drop to 80-81. Biggest time price factors in is when a site has very little content and isn't updating. But a site with little content and no updates is going to score low anyway.
I really like Team Skeet and their webmaster is helpful if needed. It's an especially good network if you like the schoolgirl niche. I think they do it better than any site, plus their male talent isn't overly obnoxious or chatty. I also like their Latina site, more so than just for Latinas. Nearly all the girls on it are amateurs. A few will show up on another site or two, but you don't see a lot of common Latina pornstars on Oye Loca. You get the feeling they have to put a lot into these scenes, travel, hunting the models and from the way the webmaster talks they are a fairly small operation without a lot of staff.
I've been in a relatively negative mood lately with sites. I would have picked 21 Sextury just based on them being consistently good for so long, but I don't like the new format and the newer content just doesn't compare to their older scenes. Just did a full subscription to Videobox with Evil Angel/Vivid channels added from the start, added Kink channel in the last week to get the prorated price and felt mostly ripped off. The servers were slow throughout the membership and they now have some kind of server reset each day. If you're downloading files when it resets, the files will be broken. For the whole month of membership including the 3 channels, I downloaded around 90 GB. That's at a total cost of roughly $45. Was on Nubiles a few months ago and had the same impression I always do with them. Everything is very good except they get models very early in their career and the models are much tamer than they have become in other scenes on other sites. Still a good site and buy though. Haven't been to DDF in over a year. Haven't been to TD in over 2 years.
Really depends for me. I've tried to differentiate in my reviews. In reviews of sites that I personally enjoy the content of, I will review more from the perspective I have towards the content. If it's content that I wasn't into as much personally, I try to review it from potential members perspectives who would enjoy the style/genre. Based on that, if it's a site that I don't personally enjoy, I do take into account how much content there is, but if it's a site I do enjoy the content of, the quantity becomes less important to the score.
I used the comparison before. If a site has 2,000 scenes but I only keep 20 scenes is it really better than a site that has only 40 scenes, but I keep all 40 scenes?
With that said, that's why the sites with the lesser appealing content to me personally get a different scoring system since I figure others more interested in the genre would keep more than 20 out of 2,000 scenes.
I went with "other" for a couple of reasons. One, I hate download limits of any kind. My first "punished" review was of Kink's Ultimate Surrender back in 2007 or so, where I removed 20 points because they had a 10 GB per month limit. I probably wouldn't have been that upset if I hadn't run out of GB limit before even downloading, all of the star of the site's content, Dragon Lily. Of course, 10 GB per month was just crazy. Reality Kings back then had a 1 GB per day limit which was nearly as bad. Bang Bros always said they have a 500 MB per day limit, but I never ran into it.
I have wondered about some sites lately like Reality Kings who had a Year End Blowout, $9.95 "trial" deal through freeones in December. As others had shown me with Naughty America, they use the 1st month low price of $9.95 and list it as a trial. I never downloaded enough on NA to find out if these trial low price first month memberships were limited. Which if so, could explain Reality Kings making their limit active again. I am almost positive that the freeones deals reverted back to the regular price after the first month, unlike most of the TBP deals that allow you to keep the discounted price throughout the course of your membership as long as you let it recur. Just a thought since we all know how nearly all porn sites can be these days when it comes to trying to get a large number of new members at one time.
The reason I picked "other" though, my cable internet company sent me a postcard this time last year that said I had gone over the 100 GB per month download/upload bandwith limit. Which I had no idea I had a limit. Once I showed them that I wasn't doing anything illegal with the bandwith like file sharing, they backed off and told me not to worry about the "limit" but did show me where AT&T U-Verse internet has a bandwith limit listed in their terms, Charter internet had one in their terms and Comcast internet had one in their terms.
They do seem to be pulling away from it though. If however the Internet Providers do start limiting how much bandwith we can use and the number varied in those I saw from 100-250 GB a month, it wouldn't make it that unrealistic for sites to start limiting since we could only download theoretically 3-8 GB per day based on those internet provider limits. I hope it doesn't come to that, but I would think if it does, there isn't much other choice available but to accept it.
It does somewhat. I'm sure Shap, formerly of Twistys, helped his site's case with an open mind to criticism and friendly disposition to even those who were being critical. On the other hand, I've known a few webmasters, won't mention her name, that put their site on a blacklist for me just because of her attitude. I tried and tried to give that site a chance since I did find her attractive and found the niche she did interesting, but couldn't talk myself into joining it. Others, especially the big sites, I don't expect much interaction from them and look over their lack of interest in opinion from their members as long as they keep delivering the content that brought me to the site in the first place.
Do you ever have trouble with Media Player Classic Home Cinema requesting updates? I like it as well as I do VLC, mainly because I like the spot zoom feature, but it keeps telling me to update Direct X June 2010 or something like that.
On a past related note, I was messing with VLC the other day and had it open a second window that had full controls while in full screen on the on the other screen. Have no clue had I did it. I remember we talked about that feature before. I haven't tried it lately, in-laws are in for the holidays, but I am thinking I pushed one of the number pad buttons since I was seeing if I could make VLC zoom like Media Player Classic does.
And on the poll, I picked VLC since I use it the most.
Eve Angel solo sites have forever ruined holiday sets for me. Nearly every year for the last 7 years Eve has had a bunny rabbit costume set for Easter, a foot fetish Halloween set where she rubs her feet into a pumpkin and I think at least 7 in Santa outfits.
I like the 720p, last time I was on In The Crack, I didn't download any of the 1080p because of file size. Though my monitor is 1920x1080, I've found that the 1280x720 videos look plenty good on it. There was a site, maybe Sapphic Erotica or one of the DDF sites that had an odd 960x580 or something like that, that I really liked as an overall combination since those did look plenty good and were half the size of the 1080p files.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.