| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
B is the only way to go. (That may be because I'm a B.) Actually, I appreciate all sizes as long as they're natural. Natural breasts are beautiful no matter the size or shape. I'm aware that many men would not agree with me. :)
|
06-02-12 05:52pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
No need to apologize -- I get where you're coming from -- but these are generalizations that are applicable only to a percentage of women. I can turn the scenario around and say that perhaps you were attracted, as a younger man, only to women who liked bad boys. It cuts both ways. I have a lots of female friends -- mostly educated, I grant you -- and I've never once heard one of them compliment on a man on his bank account or claim they were attracted to a man because of his notoriety. Plenty of us have a much healthier attitude than that, but I should also add that it's difficult to find men who are truly worthy of our devotion. :) And yes, now *I'm* generalizing. :)
|
02-25-12 12:19pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
If I may offer a female perspective ... I've known rich guys who are lousy tippers, and that says everything I need to know about their character. A big bank account does *not* make you sexier -- at least to most women. It's much more important that you be a decent person ... one who's thoughtful, respectful and not self-centered -- and, above all, honest. We all make judgments based on appearance, but those judgments are re-evaluated once we get to know each other. So while there will always be women drawn to superficial characteristics, they do not represent the gender as a whole. So my recommendation would be to leave behind the generalizations about what women want: don't try to impress us with stuff that we can easily see through, and just be yourself -- assuming that self is a good person interested in learning about another soul.
|
02-16-12 05:23pm
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer guys who shave -- or at least trim. Coincidentally, that's how guys prefer me. :) So don't let your razor be a stranger to your nether regions -- thus improving the appearance and appeal. Just be careful with the razor. ;)
|
09-09-11 04:12am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm a Mac girl. Safari here. But I also use Camino. Seems I'm the odd woman out here. :)
|
08-13-11 01:30pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I find it extremely erotic when done well -- the gradual build-up in intensity, the subtle movements of the receiver as she receives pleasure, the naughtiness of being privy to something that's so private. Now, if the scene is long, it can get tedious and monotonous ... it needs some skillful editing to sustain the momentum.
|
08-10-11 09:00am
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As a Mac girl, I lean toward mpg files. The less I have to worry about getting a video to play, the better. :)
|
07-09-11 12:32pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like an attractive design -- if a site is appealing, I'll likely spend more time checking it out (assuming its content reflects my tastes). But what's most important is ease of navigation.
|
06-03-11 04:34am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Kissing is king for the queen. Everything else are just details.
|
05-26-11 07:00pm
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I will always be small, natural, and proud. :)
|
05-24-11 07:17am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It puts all the focus on the model. If she's compelling -- and if the scene isn't too lengthy -- it's a decent alternative to traditional filming.
|
05-23-11 05:40pm
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
The advent of the Internet has made it more difficult for us to discover our boyfriend's porn stash. Damn you, Internet! :)
|
05-21-11 12:07pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BenThruston's Reply
Thanks for the thoughtful response. I appreciate it. :)
|
05-19-11 05:29pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As a porn star (who didn't do anal) once stated, "My butt is exit only." 'Nuff said. :)
|
05-19-11 12:12pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Ha! I can assure you that you're accurate on that point. :) Thanks for the reply -- I appreciate it! :)
|
05-19-11 12:08pm
|
Reply
41
|
Amateur Allure
(2)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Pray tell ... what's the joke? Or should I figure it out from context? Good to hear from you ... that dog is cute as ever! :)
|
05-18-11 04:06pm
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've never understood the appeal of anal to men. Perhaps someone can enlighten me.
|
05-18-11 09:33am
|
Reply
43
|
Live Jasmin
(2)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks so much, mbaya. I'm a grad student, so my funds are limited, but I'll surely submit additional reviews as my pocketbook allows. =)
|
08-14-10 12:12pm
|
Reply
44
|
Live Jasmin
(2)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Hi Jay - From what I've heard iFriends is a legitimate competitor to Live Jasmin. It has many more American performers -- not sure why that is -- but it's also more expensive and a bit sneaky in the way it charges customers. If you're accustomed to LJ's "free chat" area before you commit to paying a fee, you might be surprised that on iFriends, a similar experience begins charging you immediately, and if you opt for a private session, the fees only increase from here. So be careful -- read the very fine print on iFriends before you do anything. Thanks for replying! =)
|
08-05-10 05:50am
|
Reply
45
|
Live Jasmin
(2)
|
Reply of
surferman's Reply
Hi surferman - I gave it a 60 because it does offer a lot of performer options, and if you're someone with plenty of disposable income, it can certainly serve to satisfy your needs. Didn't seem fair to give it a failing grade. =) Thanks for replying!
|
08-05-10 05:47am
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I vote "No, Because I'm afraid it will be Ron Jeremy."
=)
|
06-21-08 07:14pm
|
Reply
47
|
Be The Mask
(0)
|
Reply of
themask's Review
That's terrible. I hope you complained big-time about your losses. Assuming this is something the site does consistently -- unfairly raise the hopes of its members -- then it won't be around for long, but that's little comfort for someone who's dished out $500. Then again, I suppose part of this might have to fall under the heading of "too good to be true."
|
05-12-08 10:14am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I have so little money these days, I'm not joining a site, but I'd use the score as a general guide, then read the reviews from those contributors whose opinions I value. If I find that the score doesn't necessarily align with those reviews, I'll ignore it.
|
05-12-08 10:08am
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Poll
The question is: would Hillary gain votes or lose votes among the porn-loving crowd. =)
|
05-09-08 11:43am
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
I like dark-rimmed glasses that give the female an intellectual look. (Stop laughing.)
|
05-07-08 12:20pm
|
