| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
peepee's Poll
Huge loads, but they should be real. How often do we see s0ome stupid 'stud' produce a few pathetic drops of clear fluid! Pron producers should tell them to refrain from sex / masturbating for a few days before the shoot.
Worst of all is fake cum (as in tug job queens)
|
02-13-09 04:55am
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I prefer the face. But most studs need target practice. I know there's a certain amount of moving around when they yank their crank, but the snocistency with which they MISS the face (or most of it) is remarkable.
|
02-13-09 04:49am
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Talk about a no contest!!!!! Fake tits are the biggest turn off! They seem to me to be what guys complain about the most in porn stars, yet they keep putting them in! I simply don't get it. Fake tits should only be reserved for girls who have got nothing.
|
02-13-09 04:47am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer pubic hair, but is must be trimmed and neat. These bushes where there is jungle everywhere - that looks aweful! Yet the 'hairy' sites keep trading on that particular thing.
|
02-13-09 04:44am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I prefer doggy. Especially if the girl has big tits. When the guy fucks ferociously, the tits swing around like a set of wrecking balls.
|
02-13-09 04:37am
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
B&W is crap, and a waste of time.
|
02-13-09 04:34am
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I much prefer to 'see the evidence', and watch her blow the semen slowly out of her mouth, and out o
|
02-13-09 04:33am
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I assume single shoot is for a solo girl (strip). My rule of thumb is: 100 pics solo strip, 150 for a sex scene (eg insertion, gg, bg, etc) Anything more than this is tiresome, unless it's really good, which most of them are not.
Any shoot which cannot 'state it's case' within these limits is too long.
|
02-13-09 04:29am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Squirting is like 'speaking in tongues' (religious experience); .0001 percent real, 99.9999 percent manufactured. Personally I think it's bullshit.
|
02-13-09 04:26am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I one of those who has a virtually empty profile. That's simply because I haven't got around to filling it out. And In any case, the person w/o profile details doesn't necessarilly have anything to hid. Afterall, they can simply fill their profile with bullshit, and who would know?
|
02-13-09 04:23am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Most scenes the girls usually have their eyes shut, don't they? I think that's the best way around it. Goggles & protective ghar looks stupid, and rob the shot of it's erotic clout.
|
02-13-09 04:10am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
THE SMILE!!!!!!! With eyes a close second. In porn, if the girl has a smile full of character, and looks as though she's enjoying it, this counts for more than anything else.
|
02-12-09 05:41am
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I often visit Sir Rodney. However, this site is streets ahead of SR.
SR does the reviews, and people can submit comments. These comments are not reviews, and are usually short, to the point comments.
SR's reviews are, in my opinion, too soft. Sometimes he doesn't give a site the caning it deserves (On the other hand, sometimes he does.) It's usually up to the contributers (there isn't membership like on this site) to make up the shortfall.
PS according to Sir Rodney, his father was Lord Rodney!
|
02-12-09 05:36am
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer exclusive. I've often found that the non-eclusive sites (so-called megasites) are full of recycled shit I've seen dozens of times before.
|
02-12-09 05:30am
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Sites that insist on a code give me the shits. Usually they are difficult to decipher, and often these sites don't let you chose your own PW & UN in the first place. Worst of all are the sites that demand you to re-login after 5 minutes being idle, or 30m after previous login. The stupid ruprechts don't seem to realise that this kind of obsessiveness puts people off.
|
02-12-09 05:22am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
cblodg's Poll
The best discussion forum (apart from this site of course!)I found was on Girls Out West. The content of the site was satisfactory, but the forum really made it a lot of fun.
|
02-12-09 05:17am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Poll
I like the concept of solo girl sites - you follow her through her career, etc.
Having said that, I have yet to find a solo girl site that was any good. Most of their content would not stack up within a conventional site.
|
02-12-09 05:12am
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Getreal's Poll
I love tickle sites!
|
02-12-09 05:09am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Many guys wish their dicks were bigger. Mine is average length, and fairly thick. But my wife is of a small build, and sex is sometomes uncomfortable for us both. It also means that my favourite position (and hers too) - doggie - is out of the question.
So the size is relevant to where it's going!!!
|
02-12-09 05:06am
|
Reply
45
|
Scoreland
(1)
|
Reply of
Anth's Comment
WOW! Sounds like you had a heap of problems with this lot! Good that you submitted detailed descriptions of what happened, as well as the text of their email.
I had problems with another bunch of shonks - Naked Novices (See my comments in forum & my review of the site)
We can only hope that by naming these fuckers they'll either change their evil ways or go out of business.
|
02-12-09 04:59am
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
We have a kid in our care who has a bucketload of problems. Was sexually abused in birth family, etc, etc. I'd never let him watch porn - he couldn;t handle it. So it depends on the kid.
But when we were kids (12 yo), we somehow got hold of porn magazines. My mum was disgusted! But I don;t think I was morally damaged by seeing naked women at that age - in fact, it seemed to me the most natural thing!
|
02-12-09 12:57am
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I don;t think it's disgusting, I just think it's bullshit. What's the turn on?
|
02-12-09 12:54am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Getreal's Poll
Latinas, Russians, and Maori women
|
02-12-09 12:52am
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
The price is important, because we look for value for money. I have no problem with the girls getting paid - in fact, I think they should get paid more on the bad sites, because undountably they have to put up with more bnullshit. But if the morons run a bad site, the dollar should bite their bums, and I think a rating of what the sites is worth would be good.
|
02-12-09 12:50am
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I prefer them naked, but start clothed. For me, a really important part of the seduction is when one person takes the lead, and undresses the other. This is particularly good in a gg scene.
I don't mind a bit of clothing on, and variety is important. But it must be done in good erotic taste. For example, leaving an open see-through negligee on, open, in doggie position is great.
But by contrast, fucking with the knickers is bullshit, and has become a stupid cliche.
|
02-12-09 12:44am
|
