Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : troglodite (69)  

Feedback:   All (103)  |   Reviews (38)  |   Comments (11)  |   Replies (54)

Other:   Replies Received (53)  |   Trust Ratings (34)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 54 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

I'm sure I'm well over a few terabytes of porn now. It's definitely more than I'll ever be able to watch, but I'm a collector by nature so it just piles up onto DVD-R after DVD-R. The biggest problem is where to put them all when I know I will have visitors lol!

11-13-07  02:42pm

N/A Reply of Pinche Kankun's Poll

Solo girl sites are actually probably my favorites. I don't know how to explain it, because I do like good hardcore porn as much as anyone, but at the same time, I'll join the site of a girl who looks like little summer twice as fast as I'd join a bangbros or similar HC network with 30 sites to choose from.

11-11-07  06:27pm

N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I use Windows Media Player. I've tried VLC and MPC, but the feature that has continued to win me over is that I can jump to any point in the movie by clicking exactly where I want to jump to on the progress-bar thingy. If I try to jump to say 2/3 through the movie in WMP, I just click once right at that spot on the bar. If try that in MPC or VLC player, it jumps ahead in the movie some unknown amount. I can drag the progress bar if I want, but I wanna click it and have it go where I clicked, not some random spot that it chooses! Seems simple to me, but no other player seems to do that like WMP. Yes I'm picky :)

10-24-07  02:54pm

N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

I check the new listings daily. Generally keeping my eyes open for more single-model sites, since good ones are so hard to find, I hate to let a good one skip by my watchful eye!

10-16-07  07:26pm

N/A Reply of cblodg's Poll

I like when sites have them, but I don't post on them much. It's interesting to see what other people have to say about the site, and it's good that you can see that you're not the only one who doesn't think you're getting your money's worth sometimes. Princesspresley.com took down their forum since people were bitching so much about lack of updates. On the other hand, the folks at youngporn.net were very good about taking care of member concerns, so they can be a good thing to have at times for both parties.

10-14-07  11:47am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Recovering EQ-holic. Played it way too much for 4-5 years, and still miss it some, but am probably better off without it.

I do think it is a pertinent question though, as it does help to determine the demographic of the PU user-base. There are lots of statistics on what type of person plays online games. If the results of this poll hold up so strongly in the "no" category, it can become safe to say that maybe this user-base probably isn't the same as the online gaming industry, which often consists of a bit younger, tech-savvy crowd.

10-08-07  03:15pm

N/A Reply of jd1961's Poll

I'm sure that some do - but honestly, it really is a good incentive. I join 2-3 sites a month usually, and while I know that my experiences might be helpful, it's easy sometimes to just put off reviewing. However, with the carrot dangling in front of my nose, writing that review moves up the priority list a bit.

At the same time, personally the fact that I might get monetary reward for my work also means that I feel I should do a good job on my reviews. I've never sat down and churned one out in 2-3 minutes, and I'm not saying I would if the money wasn't there, but I feel that I owe it to the site if it's investing a bit of money into my time.

So to sum up that jarbled mess - I don't think many people write reviews just for the reward, but the reward does ensure more frequent and possibly higher quality reviews than there might be if there was no reward.

09-26-07  05:52pm

N/A Reply of roseman's Poll

I'm with jd1961 here - of course a full trial is preferable to a limited one. I can't imagine anyone could sit here and say "yeah I'd rather be limited to just a tiny bit of content than given access to the whole site", but there are multiple things to consider: If a site is brand new, I might not want to spend $25-30 on full membership when I'm gonna come away with like 4 vids and a handful of picsets (I've gotten burned a couple of times this year), so those sites are always nice to see a 3-day full trial membership for, since the site isn't really worth the money yet.

However - for established sites, they don't necessarily need a trial if they have a great tour that indicates what you're going to get when you sign up. Look at bangbros or FTV or Liz Vicious - you can pretty much pick the scenes you want before you even join up. I think that's great and wish more sites could follow suit. Tours should *always* be dynamic and demonstrate the frequency and content of the latest updates. It's easy to spend money then. Sorry for the long reply! :)

09-16-07  12:45pm

N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I don't let trials renew too often, but I do let subscriptions renew on occasion if they're either a) so rich in content that I can't get everything I want in a month's time or b) They offer an awesome rebill price. I subscribed to the realitykings network for over 3 years because they offered me a $9.99 monthly option when I originally went to cancel (no idea if they still do that anymore). I wish more sites would do that!

09-04-07  02:40pm

N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

Before I discovered TBP, I frequented pornliving.com and Rabbits Reviews a lot more. Now I really only look at the others if I want a second opinion on a site I'm about to join (more for member area screenshots than anything else usually).

There really is no comparison to TBP though.

08-16-07  02:59pm

N/A Reply of apoctom's Poll

I burn it all off to dual-layer DVDs which gets expensive, but find that I rarely pull out one of the burned discs to watch. It seems I'm usually most interested in what's actually on my hard drive at the time, which generally fluctuates between 100-200gigs. Probably too much, but hey it keeps me occupied huh!

07-23-07  03:20pm

N/A Reply of nygiants03's Poll

I buy a lot of music and movies in addition to my porn habit, so what I've won from this site has gone towards those collections instead. I try to limit my porn budget to 1-2 sites a month (which rarely works, but hey it's worth trying!)

07-10-07  03:05pm

N/A Reply of jd1961's Poll

This site appears to have been designed as a site not only for porn "users" but also the webmasters of these sites. I would be interested to know if webmasters are allowed to give trust ratings. If I don't like a site and I rate it objectively, I don't want to be viewed as an "untrusted" reviewer because the webmaster decides to vindictively leave a negative trust rating for me.

But by that same token - even if webmasters are not allowed to leave trust ratings, they could just sign up with a regular user account and leave the same ratings anonymously, so I suppose it really doesn't matter there.

But just so that I stop rambling - I think reasons are good to require. If someone doesn't trust my reviews or comments, I'd like to have an idea why.

06-24-07  06:47pm

N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Feeds were good when I first started joining porn sites. Now I've seen most of them and come to my own determination that there's usually not much I want to see. They're usually streaming only, heavily fragmented into 1 minute clips, incredibly slow, or difficult to navigate, or sometimes all of the above.

On the other hand - I do like seeing the "Teens For Cash" sites included as extras. They share a lot of those negative qualities I just mentioned, but I like em anyways!

05-29-07  03:41pm

N/A Reply of ylover's Poll

Camshows are alright - but I hate the ones on the Camz network. It's great for the girl I'm sure to have 3000 people "chatting" with her at once, but every single person in the room obviously gets lost in the shuffle.

05-11-07  02:26pm

Visit Alyssa Doll

Alyssa Doll
Reply of ace of aces's Review

Surprised to see there are now only 27 videos. I used to join every few months for the updates (she's one of the few girls I've found hot enough to do so for), and my collection sits at 62 total vids (just checked!). There used to be 2 sections of videos, one with the HD ones and one with not-so-HD ones. The last update I grabbed was titled "Hanging Out In The Bedroom". Is that the most recent one on the site now?

The new videos definitely *look* better, but I liked the older ones better for the content. I dunno why - but it seemed the action was a little hotter and a little less routine. Wish she was still updating!

11-08-07  03:55pm

Visit Alyssa Doll

Alyssa Doll
Reply of ace of aces's Comment

That person is a genius! :)

11-07-07  03:34pm

Visit Amy's Girlfriends

Amy's Girlfriends
Reply of BIGSTEVE's Comment

I'm guessing it's a repeat. I joined her site back when she was known as Liberty Valentine. Seems her webmaster must have sold her content and it is being re-released as new content for other sites. I noticed the same thing with Kitty Karsen's content lately.

06-04-09  07:42pm

Visit Brain Pass

Brain Pass
Reply of Brainpat's Reply

Thanks for the reply Brainpat - I'll keep my eyes open in case you guys ever decide to go back and re-encode some of the vids on the solo girl sites (namely Melissa's) to a higher res format. I've been a member a couple times before, and as long as the network keeps growing, I'm sure I'll be back for my 4th membership!

11-12-07  03:05pm

Visit Brain Pass

Brain Pass
Reply of sisterhood's Review

Does Melissa Doll's site have any of the high-quality vids? I'd rejoin the network just to get higher-quality versions of her vids. I see her tour has been updated, but no video previews to give any hints of quality.

11-11-07  06:52pm

Visit Brandi Belle

Brandi Belle
Reply of jake07621's Comment

I'll have to respectfully disagree with you on the price here. If it was a year ago, I'd be on board, but she has faithfully kept up with an update every week, and the number of episodes is definitely respectable now. Doing some comparison shopping, there are sites out there that offer far less content, with sometimes no update schedule at all and no bonus sites at all (take a look at my Princess Presley review for example).

Now this isn't to say I would be angry if they added a bonus site or two (how about giving Ellie Idol her own site?!), but Brandi Belle is one of the few single-model sites where I have felt like I truly got what I paid for.

10-08-07  03:43pm

Visit Brooke Skye

Brooke Skye
Reply of DDD43's Comment

I don't recall any vids with music in them at all - maybe one or 2 of the more gimmicky ones. There's usually not even anything playing in the background. Just her own moans and groans :)

Usually she gives a little intro into what's gonna happen in the vid like - "I'm gonna go masturbate in an elevator and YOU can come watch!"

Personally - I wish more solo girls had sites like hers, but I'm afraid she may have stopped updating.

09-25-07  03:28pm

Visit Chick Trick

Chick Trick
Reply of Monahan's Comment

Took a look myself, and while it may be premature to have "beware" warnings based on just a tour in most cases, it does appear that there are no models here newer than the ones I first saw in like 2002 or 2003. Reality porn is anything but reality - so you can usually judge a site's ability to update based on the models in their tour, since they'll generally be most of the same ones between all of the more major sites. That said - I wouldn't join this one, but if someone's looking for a long lost Taylor Rain scene or something like that, it's nice that the site is still sitting around taking memberships. :)

10-28-07  09:02am

Visit Dirty Jason

Dirty Jason
Reply of qualsite34's Review

Ouch - sorry to see the snookering you got caught by. Yeah it is a rule of thumb that those checkboxes are generally "in addition to" the cost of the site you were actually trying to join. I've actually not seen any site trying to hawk anything more than a trial membership off with that option. Pretty shady if you ask me. You might consider putting a warning note on the Exploited College Teens site (if you haven't already).

That said, I'm with you on this site - very staged (there's no such thing as reality porn) and very amateurish. I'd be surprised if anyone really thought they were getting their money's worth here, but you never know. Although - he does have an Ellie Idol episode up, and that's worth a lot by itself :)

10-08-07  03:23pm

Visit Dream Kelly

Dream Kelly
Reply of turismo's Reply

The newest 4 videos are in HD, and are full masturbation scenes and made the site worth joining for me. Beyond that, it's still hit or miss as to whether it is a photoshoot or an actual scene. I don't mind a few photoshoot scenes every now and then, but it's nice when they're not the focus of the site. Unfortunately they still make up a big portion of the videos. There's 9 pages of 7 videos apiece, and I'd say 1/2 to 2/3 of them are photoshoot. Hopefully the HD videos continue at a regular pace. I'm convinced that the guys running this network of sites rotate their videos on most of the other solo girl sites, but I think Kelly's site might actually have them all out there.

04-10-07  10:05pm

Shown : 1-25 of 54 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.42 seconds.