Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : troglodite (69)  

Feedback:   All (103)  |   Reviews (38)  |   Comments (11)  |   Replies (54)

Other:   Replies Received (53)  |   Trust Ratings (35)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 54 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

I check the new listings daily. Generally keeping my eyes open for more single-model sites, since good ones are so hard to find, I hate to let a good one skip by my watchful eye!

10-16-07  07:26pm

Reply
27
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(4)
Reply of exotics4me's Review

Just a little extra note - I was a member of this network for over 2 years running (thanks to getting a nice price from one of those "wait - don't cancel! Resubscribe for only $9.99 a month!" deals). The DL limit seems to come and go, but I rarely ever hit the limit, even though it was very easy to go over 1GB downloading in a day. So just a warning to new users - your mileage may vary on the download limit!

10-14-07  08:43pm

Reply
28
N/A Reply of cblodg's Poll

I like when sites have them, but I don't post on them much. It's interesting to see what other people have to say about the site, and it's good that you can see that you're not the only one who doesn't think you're getting your money's worth sometimes. Princesspresley.com took down their forum since people were bitching so much about lack of updates. On the other hand, the folks at youngporn.net were very good about taking care of member concerns, so they can be a good thing to have at times for both parties.

10-14-07  11:47am

Reply
29
Visit Brandi Belle

Brandi Belle
(0)
Reply of jake07621's Comment

I'll have to respectfully disagree with you on the price here. If it was a year ago, I'd be on board, but she has faithfully kept up with an update every week, and the number of episodes is definitely respectable now. Doing some comparison shopping, there are sites out there that offer far less content, with sometimes no update schedule at all and no bonus sites at all (take a look at my Princess Presley review for example).

Now this isn't to say I would be angry if they added a bonus site or two (how about giving Ellie Idol her own site?!), but Brandi Belle is one of the few single-model sites where I have felt like I truly got what I paid for.


10-08-07  03:43pm

Reply
30
Visit Meat Members

Meat Members
(0)
Reply of SnowDude's Review

Been a long time since I've joined this network, but it sounds like not much has changed, so hope you don't mind me throwing my 2 cents in here, since it sounds like our experiences were similar.

Unfortunately I joined right after they had tamed down some of the rougher sites (and completely gotten rid of pissmops.com, which wasn't my thing, but I suppose is worth mentioning). I'm not usually a big fan of super-rough stuff, but if you want to spend just one month's budget on some rougher stuff, this is probably one of the best places to give it a whirl, as long as you stick mostly to the flagship sites.

I also thoroughly enjoyed the site "Midnight Prowl" where the girls are paid to screw some ugly dudes they allegedly pull off the streets (highly doubtful - must repeat - there's no such thing as reality porn!!). It was pretty nasty, but a lot of fun to watch :)


10-08-07  03:35pm

Reply
31
Visit Dirty Jason

Dirty Jason
(0)
Reply of qualsite34's Review

Ouch - sorry to see the snookering you got caught by. Yeah it is a rule of thumb that those checkboxes are generally "in addition to" the cost of the site you were actually trying to join. I've actually not seen any site trying to hawk anything more than a trial membership off with that option. Pretty shady if you ask me. You might consider putting a warning note on the Exploited College Teens site (if you haven't already).

That said, I'm with you on this site - very staged (there's no such thing as reality porn) and very amateurish. I'd be surprised if anyone really thought they were getting their money's worth here, but you never know. Although - he does have an Ellie Idol episode up, and that's worth a lot by itself :)


10-08-07  03:23pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Recovering EQ-holic. Played it way too much for 4-5 years, and still miss it some, but am probably better off without it.

I do think it is a pertinent question though, as it does help to determine the demographic of the PU user-base. There are lots of statistics on what type of person plays online games. If the results of this poll hold up so strongly in the "no" category, it can become safe to say that maybe this user-base probably isn't the same as the online gaming industry, which often consists of a bit younger, tech-savvy crowd.


10-08-07  03:15pm

Reply
33
N/A Reply of jd1961's Poll

I'm sure that some do - but honestly, it really is a good incentive. I join 2-3 sites a month usually, and while I know that my experiences might be helpful, it's easy sometimes to just put off reviewing. However, with the carrot dangling in front of my nose, writing that review moves up the priority list a bit.

At the same time, personally the fact that I might get monetary reward for my work also means that I feel I should do a good job on my reviews. I've never sat down and churned one out in 2-3 minutes, and I'm not saying I would if the money wasn't there, but I feel that I owe it to the site if it's investing a bit of money into my time.

So to sum up that jarbled mess - I don't think many people write reviews just for the reward, but the reward does ensure more frequent and possibly higher quality reviews than there might be if there was no reward.


09-26-07  05:52pm

Reply
34
Visit Brooke Skye

Brooke Skye
(0)
Reply of DDD43's Comment

I don't recall any vids with music in them at all - maybe one or 2 of the more gimmicky ones. There's usually not even anything playing in the background. Just her own moans and groans :)

Usually she gives a little intro into what's gonna happen in the vid like - "I'm gonna go masturbate in an elevator and YOU can come watch!"

Personally - I wish more solo girls had sites like hers, but I'm afraid she may have stopped updating.


09-25-07  03:28pm

Reply
35
N/A Reply of roseman's Poll

I'm with jd1961 here - of course a full trial is preferable to a limited one. I can't imagine anyone could sit here and say "yeah I'd rather be limited to just a tiny bit of content than given access to the whole site", but there are multiple things to consider: If a site is brand new, I might not want to spend $25-30 on full membership when I'm gonna come away with like 4 vids and a handful of picsets (I've gotten burned a couple of times this year), so those sites are always nice to see a 3-day full trial membership for, since the site isn't really worth the money yet.

However - for established sites, they don't necessarily need a trial if they have a great tour that indicates what you're going to get when you sign up. Look at bangbros or FTV or Liz Vicious - you can pretty much pick the scenes you want before you even join up. I think that's great and wish more sites could follow suit. Tours should *always* be dynamic and demonstrate the frequency and content of the latest updates. It's easy to spend money then. Sorry for the long reply! :)


09-16-07  12:45pm

Reply
36
Visit Reality Pass Plus

Reality Pass Plus
(0)
Reply of mediafan's Comment

This network used to be stream only (although the short clips could be retrieved from your internet cache if you really wanted to save them). Do they actually offer download links now? When I was a member of these sites, I used a program called SDP to record the streaming vids. You had to let the video play through, but it did in fact work. Unfortunately, they're only like 768kbps encoded to begin with so they weren't ever great. I think it's stupid when sites don't let you download their content easily.

Note to webmasters, making your site streaming-only is not going to make me extend my membership over multiple months! It will actually result in a sooner cancellation than I might have otherwise.


09-06-07  02:35pm

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I don't let trials renew too often, but I do let subscriptions renew on occasion if they're either a) so rich in content that I can't get everything I want in a month's time or b) They offer an awesome rebill price. I subscribed to the realitykings network for over 3 years because they offered me a $9.99 monthly option when I originally went to cancel (no idea if they still do that anymore). I wish more sites would do that!

09-04-07  02:40pm

Reply
38
Visit Little Summer

Little Summer
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Reply

Kimmy fans need to check out www.lillexy.com (not yet completed - she goes by Lexy now and has changed her hair color) and www.lillaura.com. Kimmy is all over the place at Lil Laura's site. I put a review of that site up a month or so ago. Don't get too crazy with excitement though...she's not in any of Laura's hardcore scenes, only the girl-girl ones.

08-31-07  10:01am

Reply
39
Visit Little Summer

Little Summer
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Comment

Yessir - Little April, Little Summer, Chloe18, Teen Topanga, Milton Twins, Simpson Twins, Texas Twins, Trixie Teen, and Little Lupe are all done by the same company. What's sad is that out of all those sites, I think Little Lupe might be the only one still updating, and since my membership gives me access to all of the above *except* for that one, I can't really confirm that.

Personally - I'd definitely be up for another month if they'd just recode the vids to something more modern (2000kbps or so). There aren't many girls on the net I like more than Little Summer. So sad she's gone!


08-30-07  02:53pm

Reply
40
Visit Hardcore Partying

Hardcore Partying
(0)
Reply of elephant's Comment

I was a member about a year ago I'd say and they offered both mpegs and wmv files. The wmv files had DRM, while the mpegs (which were like 2-4x the size, and better quality, but split into 1 minute clips) did not. I elected to go for the mpegs of course, though it took forever and a day to get a full scene downloaded. Don't let the DRM stop you from joining unless you're dead set on wmv. I enjoyed the network pretty well.

08-27-07  02:36pm

Reply
41
N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

Before I discovered TBP, I frequented pornliving.com and Rabbits Reviews a lot more. Now I really only look at the others if I want a second opinion on a site I'm about to join (more for member area screenshots than anything else usually).

There really is no comparison to TBP though.


08-16-07  02:59pm

Reply
42
N/A Reply of apoctom's Poll

I burn it all off to dual-layer DVDs which gets expensive, but find that I rarely pull out one of the burned discs to watch. It seems I'm usually most interested in what's actually on my hard drive at the time, which generally fluctuates between 100-200gigs. Probably too much, but hey it keeps me occupied huh!

07-23-07  03:20pm

Reply
43
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(4)
Reply of pussylover's Comment

I was a member of this network for over 2 years thanks to one of those enticing "wait don't cancel - we'll give you access for just $9.95 a month!" deals. One day I logged in to find the same problem. However - my support request was answered relatively quickly (within a day or so) after which they reset my password. It does beg the question as to what kind of security they've got going on. I certainly never gave my password out anywhere, yet it was still "hacked", which is worrysome, but to their credit - they fixed the problem quickly and I never had an issue again.

07-17-07  02:32pm

Reply
44
N/A Reply of nygiants03's Poll

I buy a lot of music and movies in addition to my porn habit, so what I've won from this site has gone towards those collections instead. I try to limit my porn budget to 1-2 sites a month (which rarely works, but hey it's worth trying!)

07-10-07  03:05pm

Reply
45
Visit Trista Stevens

Trista Stevens
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Reply

I joined this site when it was brand new and there were about 10 videos on the site. I think there was 1 video update while I was a member and a few picsets. I've got it bookmarked and check the frontpage periodically, because I told myself I'd join again once she got up to 30-40 vids. I'd say it probably stopped somewhere around 20 though, with most of the updates in the past few months being "wallpaper" updates. Seriously - does anyone actually download these and use them on their desktop? Wallpaper updates don't count!

But yeah her content was pretty hot while it lasted. I agree it looks like she must have moved on :(


07-09-07  02:52pm

Reply
46
Visit Ema's Place

Ema's Place
(0)
Reply of Play Toes's Comment

It would be nice to think that some of the webmasters and/or models do actually take our opinions into account when they're managing their sites. I suspect that TBP is a fairly well-used site by hundreds (thousands?) of readers every day, and a honest, well-written, bad review on this site may definitely sway users away from their sites. It may be wishful thinking, but I'm hoping that our use of this site not only makes it easier for us consumers to better pick our favorite sites, but also makes it clearer to the site owners, designers, and models what it is that people are looking for.

07-06-07  11:03pm

Reply
47
N/A Reply of jd1961's Poll

This site appears to have been designed as a site not only for porn "users" but also the webmasters of these sites. I would be interested to know if webmasters are allowed to give trust ratings. If I don't like a site and I rate it objectively, I don't want to be viewed as an "untrusted" reviewer because the webmaster decides to vindictively leave a negative trust rating for me.

But by that same token - even if webmasters are not allowed to leave trust ratings, they could just sign up with a regular user account and leave the same ratings anonymously, so I suppose it really doesn't matter there.

But just so that I stop rambling - I think reasons are good to require. If someone doesn't trust my reviews or comments, I'd like to have an idea why.


06-24-07  06:47pm

Reply
48
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Feeds were good when I first started joining porn sites. Now I've seen most of them and come to my own determination that there's usually not much I want to see. They're usually streaming only, heavily fragmented into 1 minute clips, incredibly slow, or difficult to navigate, or sometimes all of the above.

On the other hand - I do like seeing the "Teens For Cash" sites included as extras. They share a lot of those negative qualities I just mentioned, but I like em anyways!


05-29-07  03:41pm

Reply
49
Visit Jizz Bomb

Jizz Bomb
(0)
Reply of Fowrzo's Review

Regarding the site's exclusivity - the scenes are mostly taken from New Sensations DVD releases. New Sensations is the company that operates (or at least provides the content for) this network of sites, so you could argue it is indeed exclusive in that manner, but I just thought I'd mention it in case anyone already rented a bunch of New Sensations titles on DVD.

05-29-07  03:39pm

Reply
50
Visit Girls Got Cream

Girls Got Cream
(0)
Reply of Dave21's Review

Harsh review there. I'll have to play devils advocate here. I joined the entire network of sites once (begrudgingly paying the $49.95 fee or whatever it was at that time). It was maybe a year and a half ago, but unless things have changed significantly, I would have to disagree with a lot of your points.

I think the lighting on almost all of the videos is pristine - makes the vids look even better than the bitrate they're encoded in.

Ugliest girls on the net? I think all of their empire of sites has just about the most beautiful, young-looking foreign models of any site out there. I suppose it's a matter of taste, but these girls are right up my alley.

Yeah the "cream" at the end is often fake, and yes the vids are split into 6 parts, and yes the action is repetitive (same shots in most of the videos), but I still think those are minor issues with a site that has a lot of good going for it.

Of course, it's just my opinion, and you are certainly entitled to yours.


05-29-07  03:33pm


Shown : 26-50 of 54 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.92 seconds.