Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : CactusJack (0)  

Feedback:   All (14)  |   Reviews (7)  |   Comments (7)  |   Replies (0)

Other:   Replies Received (3)  |   Trust Ratings (3)

Site Comments

All site comments from this user.
Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Comment
1
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(3)

I agree with Drooler

Big, blurry and granulated pictures are not the reason why I pay to join a site either.

Most of the sets are super soft-core and are not erotic or sexual, but try to be in their themes and titles.

The choppy/bouncy fast-paced video editing is probably the worst thing about the site. About the only thing I desired after watching them was a Dramamine pill and a motion-sickness bag.

Like the Hegre-Art site, this one seems to be more focused on travel locations, clothes, props, shadows, etc. rather than on the clear, pure sexual energy/beauty of the model herself.

About the only good thing I have to say is that they pick the best and hottest models from all the other sites. But as I said, in the end, they way in which they're shot leaves a lot to be desired, and is more of a let down than a turn on.

04-11-08  12:37pm

Replies (1)
Comment
2
Visit Kelly Madison

Kelly Madison
(1)

Lame

Not even worth the $8.95 in my opinion.

Pics are poor to average quality and boring and not erotic.

Movies are so-so.

02-06-08  01:21pm

Replies (0)
Comment
3
Visit 1 By Day

1 By Day
(0)

No more make up

There's way too much already. It looks like they dip all their models into a giant vat of orange make-up and then dump a bucket of powder over them before each shoot. My guess is that half of the budget for each shoot is spent on orange body make-up.

02-03-08  02:11pm

Replies (7)
Comment
4
Visit European Glamour Girls

European Glamour Girls
(0)

Middle of the road

Large variety of models with many who are on other sites. Some kinda hot and some not. Site navigation is average to good. All the pics in each photoset are listed on one page, however full-sized pictures pop-up. Pixel quality is fair to good on the full-sized pictures. Some are bigger and less fuzzy than others. Most pics are clear and well lit.

As with most softcore/fashion sites, it has that "if you've seen one set, you've seen them all" type feel to it. All the sets are tame and most of the poses are repeated with each girl. If you like pics of legs and ass, then this isn't your site...about 3% of all pictures are models facing backward.

The movies are middle of the road to poor. Not HDV. They have average content but need way more lighting (dark and dim). The site has potential to be erotic so I'll check back in a year to see if it has improved.

02-03-08  01:53pm

Replies (0)
Comment
5
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(3)

Massive site

The grand-daddy of all soft core sites. Half a million high quality pictures of beautiful women for a great price. Not sure what else can be said. The cons: the whole site is very soft core, some of the pictures are really grainy and the movies will make you hate how long you waited for them to download.

01-28-08  06:08am

Replies (0)
Comment
6
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(0)

I like this site

FemJoy has many updates, large and sharp quality pictures/movies, a wide variety of models who pose erotically with minimal face and body make-up. The models are beautiful girl-next-door types and seem to be genuinely positive and happy about what they are doing. The only cons are the picture quality on some of the extra large pictures can be grainy (film) and some of the old pictures/movies are not that erotic.

01-28-08  05:30am

Replies (0)
Comment
7
Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art
(1)

Overrated

Granted it has exclusive content and extremely high quality and large pictures (best you will find), I found the content of the photo sets and movies to be repetitive and boring. The majority of them are shadowy and contain non-erotic standing poses. The sets seem to be more focused on postcard travel locations and artistry, rather than on eroticism or the physical beauty of the models.

01-28-08  04:54am

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.65 seconds.