| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Twistys
(6)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yeah. It is a good deal.
However, I've just checked though and I was last at Twistys in October 2009. So, I'm probably going to wait for at least 6 months before going back. Shame to miss that deal though. :-(
I'm going to check out Viv Thomas instead though looking at the possibility of In Focus Girls.
I was last at Digital Desire in March 2009. Probably a bit too pricey to go back just yet.
|
05-02-10 05:32am
|
Reply
27
|
Twistys
(6)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
Thanks!
I'm probably due a revisit to Twistys. Either that or Digital Desire.
|
04-29-10 12:52pm
|
Comment
28
|
Twistys
(6)
|
|
04-28-10 02:40pm
Replies (5)
|
Comment
29
|
Erotique Digitale
(0)
|
|
04-28-10 02:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Lick Nylons
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- down and dirty masturbation
- vids are reasonable quality, lighting ok
- provides access to a range of other Ferro Cash sites
- navigation straightforward, easy to get to content
- seemed like it would get regular updates |
| Cons: |
- selection was small: don't believe the tour come on
- bored looking models: clinical, disinterested
- repetitive scenes
- mostly East European girls, so not much in the way of understandable talk
- zero interaction with models |
| Bottom Line: |
There's plenty of better sites giving you solo or girl-girl masturbation which are better value than this. Twistys or Suze would do.
On the plus side, you do get access to a big load of other content. However, that content is much the same.
It would be nice to have the girl come on to the camera. But, on sites like these I get the feeling that most of the "models" are street pros who are bored stiff. There's no need to speak English, but a bit of lust directed at the camera would help.
This was not money well spent and I will be steering clear of Ferro Cash sites. |
|
04-26-10 05:04am
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Only Silk And Satin
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- growing selection of photoshoots and videos
- daily updates
- very good search feature based on clothing type
- model index
- each set has a good selection; well composed and well lit
- generally pretty models, mostly smiling and seemingly enjoying the shoot
- videos also nicely lit
- zipped photoshoots
- most recent shoots have a selection of photo sizes; "ultra size" are 3000x2000, 250 dpi
- videos in several formats including HD
- nice selection of clothing, lingerie, stockings, pantyhose, shoes and boots
- reasonably active forum
- seems like there's feedback from the producers |
| Cons: |
- some of the sets/videos are a bit repetitive
- some of the outfits are repeats
- not much more than topless
- videos are on the short side
- some of the videos lack direction - girls don't really know what to do
- could do with more videos
- not much interaction with models
- creeping cross sales
- irritating FastTrack feature |
| Bottom Line: |
Only Silk and Satin delivers. You get a very good and expanding selection of pretty girls in a variety of sexy, silk and satin outfits.
Don't expect hardcore. This is strictly soft, not much more than the famous Page 3 range of UK tabloids newspapers. But, then, that's why you signed up, isn't it?
Well, that said, from comments I've seen and from my own taste, I would like to see a site that caters for clothing fetishes that provides some good masturbation scenes. Stripping from fully clothed is great, but I do want a little bit more. I guess Only is not going to give that.
As with other Only sites, there's a biased towards photoshoots. One or two videos a week and some of these look familiar to some of the photosets.
The Only brand has established itself well and is providing a regular stream of good quality product. It perhaps needs to take things to the next level. I've got a bit tired of the creeping repitition of sets and models. Perhaps Only can branch out into Only Boots or something like that. (Now that would really sell me!)
I really don't like the FastTrack feature which allows previews of content for a month at a time. Don't think this adds to the site and detracts from what is otherwise a good value site.
Overall? I've had a couple of bites of Only sites. I might come back again later. Only Boots would be a great sell. I guess we're going to have to wait for another provider to give that extra bit. |
|
04-26-10 04:49am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
32
|
Lick Nylons
(0)
|
|
10-05-08 07:02am
Replies (0)
|
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.47 seconds.
|
|
