Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : bootsulike (7)  

Feedback:   All (32)  |   Reviews (4)  |   Comments (5)  |   Replies (23)

Other:   Replies Received (11)  |   Trust Ratings (15)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-32 of 32 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(3)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Yeah. It is a good deal.

However, I've just checked though and I was last at Twistys in October 2009. So, I'm probably going to wait for at least 6 months before going back. Shame to miss that deal though. :-(

I'm going to check out Viv Thomas instead though looking at the possibility of In Focus Girls.

I was last at Digital Desire in March 2009. Probably a bit too pricey to go back just yet.


05-02-10  05:32am

Reply
27
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(3)
Reply of anyonebutme's Reply

Thanks!

I'm probably due a revisit to Twistys. Either that or Digital Desire.


04-29-10  12:52pm

Comment
28
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(3)

Legit invite?

Just had an invite back to Twistys from support@td3x.com for $14.95 a month.

I'm not sure if I like the look of the embedded link to tdx3.com

Anyone know if this is legit or a scam?

thanks
Bootsulike

04-28-10  02:40pm

Replies (5)
Comment
29
Visit Erotique Digitale

Erotique Digitale
(0)

Not so erotique

It's well over six months since I subscribed to this site, so it's not fair to do a full review.

However, I have to say the site was a big disappointment. It promised professionally and artistically shot images and videos. The premise is not your usual porn: quirky and edgy, but glossy at the same time. Erotique - whatever the hell that is.

It did deliver a unique take, unusual situations, slightly fetishtic or Gothic. But, the photos were a mixed bag and the videos were an uneven collection of short badly lit clips. Some of these were just videos of photoshoots - hardly erotic - sorry, erotique - at all.

If I remember correctly, abut 50% of the content was of one unusual, highly tattooed model. If she had been my taste that might have been ok. But, I'm no tat fan.

There was some attempt at a model index, but mostly sets were indexed by their rather naff titles.

Video was a mixture of wmv and mpg. All were low resolution and grainy, not helped by the low lighting.

To cap it all, the site had hardly been updated in over a year. A couple of newish photo sets, but no new video for months.

I think I've returned to 75% of sites within 18 months or 2 years to load up on new content. Won't bother here. If I were to give a score it would be 50.

04-28-10  02:00pm

Replies (0)
Review
30
Visit Lick Nylons

Lick Nylons
(0)

65.0
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - down and dirty masturbation
- vids are reasonable quality, lighting ok
- provides access to a range of other Ferro Cash sites
- navigation straightforward, easy to get to content
- seemed like it would get regular updates
Cons: - selection was small: don't believe the tour come on
- bored looking models: clinical, disinterested
- repetitive scenes
- mostly East European girls, so not much in the way of understandable talk
- zero interaction with models
Bottom Line: There's plenty of better sites giving you solo or girl-girl masturbation which are better value than this. Twistys or Suze would do.

On the plus side, you do get access to a big load of other content. However, that content is much the same.

It would be nice to have the girl come on to the camera. But, on sites like these I get the feeling that most of the "models" are street pros who are bored stiff. There's no need to speak English, but a bit of lust directed at the camera would help.

This was not money well spent and I will be steering clear of Ferro Cash sites.

04-26-10  05:04am

Replies (0)
Review
31
Visit Only Silk And Satin

Only Silk And Satin
(0)

87.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - growing selection of photoshoots and videos
- daily updates
- very good search feature based on clothing type
- model index
- each set has a good selection; well composed and well lit
- generally pretty models, mostly smiling and seemingly enjoying the shoot
- videos also nicely lit
- zipped photoshoots
- most recent shoots have a selection of photo sizes; "ultra size" are 3000x2000, 250 dpi
- videos in several formats including HD
- nice selection of clothing, lingerie, stockings, pantyhose, shoes and boots
- reasonably active forum
- seems like there's feedback from the producers
Cons: - some of the sets/videos are a bit repetitive
- some of the outfits are repeats
- not much more than topless
- videos are on the short side
- some of the videos lack direction - girls don't really know what to do
- could do with more videos
- not much interaction with models
- creeping cross sales
- irritating FastTrack feature
Bottom Line: Only Silk and Satin delivers. You get a very good and expanding selection of pretty girls in a variety of sexy, silk and satin outfits.

Don't expect hardcore. This is strictly soft, not much more than the famous Page 3 range of UK tabloids newspapers. But, then, that's why you signed up, isn't it?

Well, that said, from comments I've seen and from my own taste, I would like to see a site that caters for clothing fetishes that provides some good masturbation scenes. Stripping from fully clothed is great, but I do want a little bit more. I guess Only is not going to give that.

As with other Only sites, there's a biased towards photoshoots. One or two videos a week and some of these look familiar to some of the photosets.

The Only brand has established itself well and is providing a regular stream of good quality product. It perhaps needs to take things to the next level. I've got a bit tired of the creeping repitition of sets and models. Perhaps Only can branch out into Only Boots or something like that. (Now that would really sell me!)

I really don't like the FastTrack feature which allows previews of content for a month at a time. Don't think this adds to the site and detracts from what is otherwise a good value site.

Overall? I've had a couple of bites of Only sites. I might come back again later. Only Boots would be a great sell. I guess we're going to have to wait for another provider to give that extra bit.

04-26-10  04:49am

Replies (0)
Comment
32
Visit Lick Nylons

Lick Nylons
(0)

not value for money, yet

signed up yesterday without realising only 12 videos.

quality and content is ok, not great. russian/east europeans, so don't expect any talking.

slow site - took 30 mins to download 4 part vids. vids are about 4-6 mins long.

at the moment, very expensive for what it is. you do get access to other sites, but initially just one other (and that too had a limited number of videos!)

will post a fuller review when my month is up - i'll be cancelling at the first opportunity.

10-05-08  07:02am

Replies (0)

Shown : 26-32 of 32 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.49 seconds.