Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : BostonPJR (72)  

Feedback:   All (84)  |   Reviews (39)  |   Comments (1)  |   Replies (44)

Other:   Replies Received (37)  |   Trust Ratings (31)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 84 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Thin Fetish

Thin Fetish
Reply of GCode's Reply

At the time, maybe 15 or 20 sets. All worth it, but it's a shame it never went anywhere else.

11-10-09  04:39pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Definitely got the point Khan made. I have a growing collection of Xtina, Monica Bellucci, Crarisma Carpenenter, old Britney, rather and yes, the sex tape brigade. But My favorites are the ones I have to go hunting for.

08-04-08  06:20pm

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
Reply of Mr Fountain's Reply

It was maybe a year ago when I had Dial up. Took maybe 45 minutes per video. I'd put the wife to bed and DL as many as I could at once and let them go. I haven't been back on since then. But I'm looking forward to it.

08-04-08  05:17pm

N/A Reply of WeeWillyWinky's Reply

Yes she does. God bless that woman.

08-04-08  03:44am

N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

Loooved Belladonna pregnant.

07-27-08  02:11pm

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
Reply of Davit's Reply

Agreed. Although I don't know about "artificially high" seems like on the sites I like, I am consistently 5 points higher than TBPs reviewer. And I'm sure not getting any kickbacks.

07-26-08  11:15am

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
Reply of turboshaft's Review

Considering I gave it a much higher review I still do have to agree with your frustration of some of the pointless "waiting for crap to happen already" segments of the video. I may have reviewed the site with stars in my eyes, but I still do love it. But thanks for your honest review. Gave me something to consider.

07-26-08  11:11am

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
Reply of Mr Fountain's Review

Great review and you're right even with dial up, it was totally worth it.

07-26-08  11:07am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply


07-26-08  08:23am

Visit Preggolicious


Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Exclusive content. I'm always a fan of that.
- Model Kim is gorgeous, tall and skinny, makes her baby bump that much more prominent and hot. And I'm a fan of that too.
- Great video quality. I may need a new hard drive now, but it's sooo worth it.
- The shoots have variety - a lot of it. And in a one-model site, that's a pretty big plus!
- Also had some pretty frequent updates when I was a member. Who's not a fan of updates?
Cons: - Once the updates are done, that's it. Of course.
- I don't mind it, and there's no illusion to the contrary but this is a pretty softcore site. Just a model and a setting. No partners, no dildos. Too glam for some of us.
- Some of the shoots, like the banana are just kinda weird.
- I'm not a fan of her voice.
- Even the best videos can begin to get monotonous (as I click the ff button time and time again.)
Bottom Line: We all know it's true about pregnant sites, they can only last so long. Preggolicious is the new, hot site before another comes to take its place with newer, hotter, never-before-seen content. But that will be a long wait. A better preg site you are not likely to find for a good while. And it's because she is sooo gorgeous, and because the quality is so high and well-shot.
It's little more than a model site though and try as they might to keep the content varied and fresh, it didn't hold my attention for the full month. But I look forward to see if they add more models.

07-26-08  05:32am

Replies (1)
N/A Reply of JBDICK's Poll

Salma Hayek

07-26-08  05:00am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Most of the time it's good to rad a reply. If the person isn't being petty or obnoxious. I also like to see site admins or webmasters post replies.

07-26-08  04:54am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

There's something strange and sexy about them. I've never managed to figure out why, just that I do! But there are so many "just being pregnant is good enough" sites out there. She should be hot too. Not just knocked up.

07-26-08  04:52am

Visit Sexy Pattycake

Sexy Pattycake

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Patty is cute, petite, curvy in all the right places with that great naughty look in every shoot.
- Fabulous breasts. I have to say this.
- Shoots are creative; with varied outfits and themes. Especially appealing to those with a mild craving for sploshing content.
-And they are well shot. Smallish, but good framing, perfect poses. She looks like she's having fun.
- A large amount of content. Over 150 shoots and 100 or so videos.
Cons: - Problem is, I don't much care about photos these days, and the video content, while abundant, updates infequently and is pretty low quality. Years behind that of most sites.
- The site seems a bit behind in general, from video quality to photo size. I always worry when sites slow down this much.
- Videos that are more high def. must be paid for -- even by subscribers.
Bottom Line: Always one of my favorite tease girls. That's right folks, this is primarily a TEASE site. So no acting surprised. Breast shots with occasional peeks of nipples are easy to come by, as are flashes under the panties, but this model and her site are all about the tease. She does it well and keeps me coming back. She has a special appeal to minifetishes, and she has been a pioneer of her own brand of "messy" shoots: bright paint with blacklight being one of her early specialties.
But the overall delivery, unfortunately makes the website feel dated. I hate squinting to see her (fabulous) breasts.

07-25-08  07:09pm

Replies (0)
Visit Cum on Her Face

Cum on Her Face


I have no idea what to expect from this site, based on the wildly differing opinions and ratings.

07-08-08  03:47pm

Replies (0)
Visit Sex And Submission

Sex And Submission
Reply of PinkPanther's Reply


07-06-08  04:29am

Visit Thin Fetish

Thin Fetish
Reply of Goldfish's Reply

Not for all, definitely. They say on the site none of the women has an eating disorder. Then again, it's all moot. The site is dead.

07-04-08  07:27pm

N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

As many times as I've been screwed by a good preview, I still voted for them. I'm a dumbass. It's true.

07-04-08  02:40pm

N/A Reply of JBDICK's Reply

Thank you so, for introducing me to Janet Peron!

07-04-08  02:38pm

Visit Sex And Submission

Sex And Submission

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -More than enough content for several months of subscription.
-Attractive performers all of them, no matter the body type (and they do vary) they are each attractive.
- Enthusiastic (as in real) reactions of pain and arousal from the women.
- For those than love hardcore sex in bondage scenarios, Sex and Submission delivers the perfect hybrid.
Cons: - Some fairly well-known performers kinda takes some of the street cred from the site. Kind of replaces the whole dirty, underground feel with a mainstream vibe. (Maybe I just don't want to be seeing Steven St. Croix...)
- The "I totally didn't hate this" testimonial at the end is pretty lame, though I understand why they have it. Yeah, I'm stretching.
- Scenes do mirror each other somewhat.
Bottom Line: The site is amazing. Great balance of video quality and download speed. The scenes are just plain hot, despite the sometimes routine approach. For those that love hardcore fucking delivered with their BDSM instead of just whipping for whipping's sake, then this is just another in a whole family of sites with memorable scenes , incredibly sexy performers, and tons of content.

07-04-08  01:46pm

Replies (2)
Visit Thin Fetish

Thin Fetish

Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - This is a hard-to-find niche and thinfetish is the most recent site to highlight it.
- The girls are mostly young, attractive and skinnier than the usual fare on the next-best sites like Hegre.
- Forum has posts from defunct sites of long lost forgotten skinnies- some quite extreme -for the real thin beauty lovers out there.
Cons: -Two, count 'em, two videos!
- Has not updated since March. It's pretty much being kept alive by the forum. But it's basically life support at this point.
- Variety is lacking and half of the (six) women are hardly beautiful by any conventional opinion. Others aren't quite as thin as you'd expect, or hope for.
Bottom Line: If you're desperate for new content of girls so skinny you probably won't find them anywhere else, then thinfetish is worth a look. In our ballooning society, it's 900 times easier to find bbw and bw (minus the b for beautiful) porn sites, than one that appreciates the girls on the other end of the sexy spectrum. And for that reason only, thinfetish is a site I'd still recommend. If only to grab all the content you can before this site shuts down completely. There are some sexy models that I wish I could find somewhere else (like the sexy bald Kate), but as for this site, it's days are numbered.

07-04-08  01:29pm

Replies (4)
Visit Brazzers


Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Boobs, by God. So many boobs!
- Video options strike a nice balance between download time and video quality.
- Love the favorites options with the girls. And I personally love that one girl can be seen doing a varietly of scenarios. i can find my favorite Baby Got Boobs girl on Big Tits at School!
- Plenty of content for the price.
Cons: - Slightly clunky navigation. I can get lost trying to go from girl to girl and site to site.
- And for that matter a lot of repeat performers. It didn't bother me too much but some people rightly do not dig seeing the same girls on supposedly "different sites."
- Few video options.
- Though there's many updates, your favorite site may not be among the quickest.
Bottom Line: Bottom line for me is, Brazzers passes the "a little something for everyone" test - which many do; as well as the "a lot of something for everyone" test - which few do. $24.95 has become the standard for sites with networks and Brazzers has the content and quality to justify it. The sites all have enough unique content that is sorted nicely by age, fetish and (most important?) fake vs. real! Any fan of breasts and hardcore porn with a hint of exploitation should love Brazzers.

07-15-07  12:05pm

Replies (0)
Visit Pornotopia

Reply of pornotopia's Reply

Thanks for the reply,
First I must say this is one of my favorite sites for exactly the reasons that you describe in your message. There is personal, painstaking work and imagination put into the quality of your content. In trying to create as unbiased a review as possible, I have to add "cons" that I personally think of more as limitations (or maybe wishes)
I don't think anyone would doubt the site gets my seal of approval and then some.

03-29-07  02:01pm

Visit Met Art

Met Art
Reply of Kittygirl's Review

Great review. Always awesome to get a female perspective on these sites. we all start to sound alike after awhile. Hope you have a few more reviews coming our way before too long.

03-28-07  05:11pm

Visit abbywinters

Reply of qualsite34's Review

Besides, Qual certainly isn't the first to give this site a 100 or near-100. It's clear the site is well loved by many. (why on Earth have I not joined ...?)

03-28-07  05:06pm

Shown : 1-25 of 84 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.52 seconds.