Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : sullivan (32)  

Feedback:   All (45)  |   Reviews (20)  |   Comments (6)  |   Replies (19)

Other:   Replies Received (24)  |   Trust Ratings (21)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-45 of 45 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of nygiants03's Poll

I have one and tried it for a few months. For a while it was nice, but over time the rubbery material became less silky and more clingy, almost sticky, so that it required more lube. When I had to relube it every three minutes to prevent it from becoming painful, I said enough of this.

Clever invention, but not perfect.


06-24-07  08:23pm

Comment
27
Visit Big Naturals

Big Naturals
(0)

video quality

I recall being a member of Big Naturals about five years ago and thinking 'this site has the best video quality of any big breast site out there!'

I signed up again last fall for a month and was thinking 'Wow, the video quality is the same as it was five years ago - but now it's inferior to that of most major sites!'

One problem the cameramen at Big Naturals and sites like Big Tits Round Asses don't seem to notice is that when you film outside on a sunny day, you often get bad pixelation, and it can spoil an outdoor scene. Big Naturals seems to have this problem a lot.

06-24-07  06:17pm

Replies (2)
Review
28
Visit Busty Kelly Kay

Busty Kelly Kay
(0)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Kelly Kay herself, a British dirty-blonde w/ a very distinct look: sleepy eyes, plump, pouty lips, slightly pointy nose; soft, not-quite chubby body with beautiful big breasts, areolae, and nipples, gorgeous pussy (not much of a butt though)

Good-sized collection of videos; most are long, hi-res, well staged and ably filmed

Lots of masturbation scenes, most w/ dildos; some lesbian action.

Good price for 3 mo. subscription, and available for $18/mo. through rabbitsreviews
Cons: A lot of the videos monotonously follow the same formula: undress, lie on bed, pose, and masturbate. The only thing that distinguishes most of them are the clothes she is wearing, and those are usually gone in a few minutes anyway!

Kelly looks hot, but she's a little slow and awkward the way she moves.

Movies have very cheesy soundtracks

Updates once a week, but last time I subscribed it was mostly pics, no more movies; in 2006 she was pregnant.
Bottom Line: Of all the solo-model sites sponsored by Scoreland, this is one of the better ones. If you've never subscribed before, or haven't subscribed since the site was very young, it's definitely worth a month's subscription. Barring a miracle or big turnaround, it's probably as good now as it will ever be.

Some of her material is available at scoreland.com and scorevideos.com, but all the best stuff is on this site.

06-24-07  09:58am

Replies (1)
Review
29
Visit Big Tits At School

Big Tits At School
(0)

90.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Models are all extremely hot, aggressive, domineering nymphomaniacs with ninja-like sex skills.
- The fantasy scenarios actually add to the eroticism of the scenes, with the actors staying 'in character' all the way through; good nasty fantasy fun.
- The movies are extremely clear and well filmed.
- Movies are very long (about 30 min./ 500 MB, on average)
- They update often - not on a regular schedule, but averaging once per week
- Network access
- Excellent site design
Cons: - Many of the sets are all clean white walls with too much light, which creates a harsh and clinical effect. If they made the sets more banged-up, shady, and dirty looking, the action would feel more dirty too.
- The network has about a dozen models who appear again and again, like Daphne, Carmella Bing, Ava Devine, etc., so that they're really overexposed. As much as I like those women, it's like a breath of fresh air when they bring in a new model. Adding a few more amateurs might help.
Bottom Line: This is an excellent value for your money, in terms of quantity and quality. When you throw in the network, it's like drinking water from a firehose; they add 1 - 1.5 MB of new videos almost every day! The only drawback is that it's a little too slick and monotonous.

06-23-07  09:53am

Replies (1)
Comment
30
Visit Alexandra Moore

Alexandra Moore
(0)

agree

I think the guy who runs all those site - divinebreasts, alicia loren, alexandra moore, and now the new Sapphire site - should be sued for malpractice. He has exclusive access to like 40% of the world's most beautiful large-busted women, and he films them with the technical equivalent of a Super 8 movie camera, that has a huge black frame and often no sound. It's infuriating! I wish some guy from Score or elsewhere would offer him a million bucks to buy out all his sites, then run and film the models properly.

06-23-07  09:06am

Replies (1)
Reply
31
Visit DDF Busty

DDF Busty
(0)
Reply of roseman's Reply

That's what I thought too, because they don't feature bustyadventures.com on their homepage. But you know what? When I was a member of bangbros about two months ago, I suddenly had access to bustyadventures. Really! Maybe it was a glitch on their part, but I know I wasn't paying separately for bustyadventures! (I don't know how much to publicize this, in case it's a loophole in their system!)

06-22-07  06:06am

Reply
32
Visit DDF Busty

DDF Busty
(0)
Reply of roseman's Reply

Jessica is great, that's for sure. She has some awesome videos on bustyadventures.com(which you get if you subscribe to bangbros.com).

06-22-07  05:09am

Reply
33
Visit XL Girls

XL Girls
(0)
Reply of roseman's Reply

I see; that makes sense now, it was a special and limited-time offer. Cool.

06-22-07  05:05am

Reply
34
Visit XL Girls

XL Girls
(0)
Reply of roseman's Review

I'm confused by your information about the subscription price for XLGirls:
- the current advertised mo. price is 29.95, not "15 USD"
- there is no FREE 7 Days trial that I have seen anywhere

I hope you can offer evidence for these claims, because they don't match what I've paid in the past or what I can see now.


06-21-07  09:09am

Review
35
Visit Boobs Garden

Boobs Garden
(0)

78.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Attractive cast of naturally busty Polish girls
- Very good variety of scenes: some are posing, but most are naturalistic 'play' (shower, kitchen, bed, gym...); some solo, some lesbian rubbing.
- Updates are regular and always have video as well as photo
- Membership includes access to Korakryk.com and Malinamay.com
- Decent sized collection of content: 67 vid and photo sets at Polish B, 29 at Kora K, 40 at Malina M
- Camera work not bad
Cons: - video res is of moderate quality; files are about 15MB per min. (a bit grainy), and movies average about 5 min. in length
- Malina does masturbation, and Kora K does masturbation and S&M, but most of the other girls like Aneta and Bea just pose
- the most recent updates are in a .mov format which for some reason I could not view on my Mac (usually I have no problem viewing any format)
- first month price of $29.95 is too steep, even if it drops to $19.95 after that.
Bottom Line: They do good lesbian scenes here; and if you were thinking of joining Malina May or Kora Kryk, it would be a better value to join Boobsgarden instead and get three times as much content. A warning though if you are a Mac user: you may not be able to view the movies from the past few months.

I joined because I'm a Bea Flora and Aneta Buena 'completist'. Wasn't worth it just for the two of them! But if you like the other models, then it could be.

There seems to be some sort of relationship between Boobsgarden and Busty.pl, with some crossover in the models and an identical pricing structure. Are their webmasters in cahoots? Or are they sworn enemies, fighting vicious behind-the-scenes battles over the rights to Bea Flora? We may never know.

06-21-07  08:59am

Replies (1)
Comment
36
Visit Nadine Jansen

Nadine Jansen
(1)

videos

I second Marianna's points about Nadine Jansen; I'd give the site the same score she did.

One slight comment/question: I haven't been a member of the site since last fall, but I do recall there being a large number of videos - at least 50, I think. Does that seem right? The site has been around for a very long time (in porn terms), so even if there are only like two movies a month, they've built up over time. They're not the best videos, but there seemed to be a lot.

06-20-07  09:46am

Replies (1)
Review
37
Visit Luna's Cam

Luna's Cam
(0)

84.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Luna is a gorgeous Latina with sweet breasts, a beautiful, soft, trim little body, seductive face, great raven hair.
- An excellent collection of photos, and a decent sized video collection
- Luna knows how to dance, and in her best movies she turns on the radio and puts on some hot moves. She can do a great striptease, when she wants.
- The most recent movies are hi-res, and have good production values, good camera-work
- Webchat reveals a sweet, charming personality.
- Regular updates
Cons: - her movies are all softcore, and a lot of them are just posing or photoshoots. She has a beautiful pussy, but the world doesn't get to see it often. Even though she can move her body great, she's still a little shy about it. The movies don't get up-close very much, either.
- the older movies in the collection tend to be short, low-res, and not as well filmed; for example there's one called "Night Slave" which would be really hot, except that it was filmed - in the dark.
Bottom Line: If you find Luna as hot as I do, and are turned-on by softcore, you won't be disappointed.

Lots of girls can pose and look cute, but there aren't many who can move like Luna. Maybe she won't go x-rated, but it would be great if she would really let loose all the time. Dance, Luna, dance! The world needs you!

06-20-07  08:45am

Replies (0)
Review
38
Visit Big Boob Passion

Big Boob Passion
(0)

62.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - They have a variety of different busty and chubby models
- Updates come at regular intervals
- The models are not exclusive, but the content appears to be
Cons: - The videos are short clips (2-5 minutes), not high res, and on some the production quality is rather low - poor lighting, or bad editing
- Too many of the models have only pics, no videos
- You don't really get any sense of who the models are; just names
- Small back catalog
- Price too high for such a marginal site
Bottom Line: Compared to other sites in this niche - sites which feature some of the same models - this one feels like all it has to offer are 'scraps' - a few photos or a few minutes of video that another site decided not to use. So, even if in a year's time they do increase their level of content, it's not clear to me that there will be much worth looking at. It's simply not in the same league as other $20 sites.

They could improve by trying to do one thing really well: specialized in one or two models, get longer or high-quality movies, add some text or extras to the site.

06-19-07  09:37am

Replies (0)
Review
39
Visit Tasty Crisa

Tasty Crisa
(0)

90.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Crisa: cute as hell, girl-next-door look; has perfect breasts, a gorgeous pussy, soft body, knows how to smile, seduce, move, and masturbate
- Videos are clear as a bell, high res, have good production values (no shaky camerawork or bad lighting)
- Scenes show a lot of variety, indoors, outdoors, lesbian and solo
- Updates are fairly regular
- Access to a network of other quality sites
- Exclusive content
Cons: - nice masturbation but no hardcore
- a few videos have no sound, and Crisa doesn't talk in her movies
- good value for $25/mo, but it's not a steal
Bottom Line: In my opinion, this is one of the most-underrated busty individual sites out there; if you find Crisa at all attractive, you'll really enjoy it. Very 'tasty'!

06-18-07  08:05am

Replies (0)
Review
40
Visit Boobs XL

Boobs XL
(0)

72.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - True big breast site; all the models have humungous tits
- Variety of types: different hair color, body type, age, etc.
- Models shown in a variety of scenes, some posing, some naturalistic or outdoorsy, often having fun
- Updates are fairly regular
- Pics and videos pretty sharp
- Filemona is a really cute BBW, with great movies
Cons: - Most of the models are 'mature', middle-aged women
- With a few exceptions, the models don't act very erotic or sexy; a lot of the clips are like home-movies from a nudist camp
- Softcore, all breasts, few below the belt shots
- Production quality on the videos not great, and they've been chopped up into a large number of clips
- Some models get the high-quality video camera (Filemona, Black Pearl), others were filmed with a lower-quality one.
- Not a huge back catalog
- Expensive
Bottom Line: The site has potential, but there's not enough material or quality to justify the high price. If you like Sabrina Meloni or Filemona, it might be worth getting now, but otherwise I would recommend waiting a year, when they should have more material to choose from and maybe more videos with the high-quality camera.

06-16-07  07:10am

Replies (0)
Review
41
Visit DDF Busty

DDF Busty
(0)

96.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Every model is gorgeous and hot as hell
- Movies are hi-res and hi-rate; new material has super hi-res DivX
- Great production values - steady cameras, good lighting, no cheesy music
- Lots of updates, as in 15 min. worth of movies every three days, and tons of photos
- Extensive back catalog
- Variety of Solo, Lesbian, Fetish, and Hardcore shoots
- Fast downloads
Cons: - the majority of the models are bleach blondes w/ tight bodies; I'd prefer to see more brunettes and redheads with a tad more meat on them
- this is glamour porn, very serious and highly stylized; there are no 'natural' scenes, and the girls don't speak (but they moan!)
- could use a few more American models
- files are huge! which is great, of course, but you'll need another hard-drive if you want to save everything they have
- early material in the back catalog not as hi quali
Bottom Line: This is top-of-the-line big bust porn, and probably the best European site. It's expensive, but you get your money's worth. I only wish all porn sites were this good!

Follow-Up:
6/26/2007 Aria Giovanni! A gorgeous movie + pics of the famous Penthouse Pet has just been added!

06-15-07  08:49am

Replies (7)
Review
42
Visit Polish Busty

Polish Busty
(0)

83.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - The models are all and without exception very hot.
- They now have a fairly large back catalog of material
- The movies have decent production values
- The scenes are very creative, fun, and naturalistic.
- The models look like they're enjoying themselves
- It's a good value for the money
- Bea Flora
- These Polish girls really know how to smoulder and seduce the camera!
Cons: - Updates are very erratic - three in one week, then none for a month, say.
- Not much pussy photography. Some of the hottest models, like Kate Bona and Maria Swan, only do glamor and non-nude shoots. But Swan goes nude at Pinupfiles. WTF?
- The older movies are only available in 1-min. clips, which you have to stitch together if you want a decent movie
- They seem to have lost some of their best talent to Boobsgarden
- The members page isn't very well designed
Bottom Line: If you've never subscribed and you like natural boobs, this is a must-get. The Bea Flora movies are the most sexy and erotic things on the entire internet, imho. After that, I would only resubscribe every eight months or so, when enough new material has built up.

06-14-07  10:31am

Replies (1)
Review
43
Visit Busty Britain

Busty Britain
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Has aspirations to be the British equal of Scoreland
- Videos are of high-res quality, long, and the quantity isn't bad
- pretty good production values (no shaky cameras or bad lights or bad music)
- Good variety of models, in terms of bust size, body size, hair color, etc.
- predictable updating
Cons: - Only updates once a week
- All British girls, it seems, who don't move or talk quite as sexy as American ones do (in my view)
- not a lot of variety in the concept for the videos; so, there are like three videos of Emily Cartwright where she lays on a bed and masturbates with a dildo, that are almost indistinguishable
- not enough Kerry Marie! (only one mov)
- not a huge back catalog yet
- not that many exclusive models
Bottom Line: A solid site, sharp and high quality but not as sexy as it could be, nor as interesting. Worth a month subscription if you've never subscribed before.

06-13-07  01:04pm

Replies (0)
Review
44
Visit Silicone Free

Silicone Free
(0)

89.0
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - HIGH RES videos
- Models are almost all EXTREMELY BUSTY
- Large amount of LONG VIDEOS
- Steady camera action, no bad music, no bad lighting
- Good collections of PHOTOS
- Excellent value for COST
Cons: - Some of the models have rather unattractive faces
- A few models are way too obese
- A large proportion of the models are mature (not my thing)
- Many of the models are European, sort of reserved, silent
- Attractive models with photos but no videos in some cases
- New videos only every nine days or so
Bottom Line: There's a lot of material here, and the production values are very high. You have to pick and choose among the models; to me, there are like four unattractive ones to every sexy one. But for the money, it's worth it; no regrets about subscribing.

06-12-07  08:47pm

Replies (0)
Comment
45
Visit Score Videos

Score Videos
(1)

billing

Has anyone had trouble getting scorenet to cancel their accounts?

06-12-07  06:46pm

Replies (1)

Shown : 26-45 of 45 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.04 seconds.