| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I don't really understand this poll. I know the phrase but I can't recall it in any advertising?
|
06-06-13 03:53pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Hmmm interesting poll but I picked "other" because I'm not sure any of the other options are correct, at least not for everybody.
Personally I do not understand the whole straight men watching lesbian porn thing, but it seems undeniably popular with many and just because I don't get it doesn't mean it's wrong. I can't see any harm in it. It's a sort of standing joke that "lesbian" sex made for a straight male audience isn't a realistic potrayal of how real lesbians have sex, but so what? I wouldn't expect it to be.
I do know of some women who watch gay male porn but it's not really an issue as they seem happy to watch porn designed with gay men in mind and I haven't seen their custom change gay porn in any way, so it doesn't bother anyone.
Clearly heterosexual men aren't going to want to watch gay men having sex, and even if they found it unpleasant to watch that doesn't make them homophobic.
The fact is that the vast bulk of porn is aimed at heterosexual men. What heterosexual porn that there is aimed at heterosexual women would not include lesbian scenes.
Some straight men are clearly not into lesbian scenes, so I guess it's best for them to boycott any movies with it in and make it clear there is a market for non-lesbian porn aimed at them, but I am sure there must be lots of stuff out there without lesbian scenes?
Bottom line - porn producers make what sells - lesbian scenes are popular and they sell, it's simple and no need to make a big deal out of it or worry about homophobia. It's creating problems where none exist.
|
06-05-13 02:50pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes I've done several - the majority were sorted out quickly, though one or two seemed to cause a little confusion. Always got there in the end though!
|
06-02-13 03:38pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
"Frequent" is quite a specific and strong word, so I'd say an absolute minimum of three times a week.
I agree with Jay G that once a week seems pretty standard, so twice a week is great but still not enough to be called "frequent" in my book.
|
05-29-13 05:39am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Organise as I go - I just have them in seperate folders for each site, nothing fancy.
The download feature on Firefox is pretty good - seems to detect which studio folder it should go into automatically most of the time!
|
05-27-13 04:00am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I love bukkake but not into Japanese porn, so I prefer Euro/US. Sadly there isn't as much bukkake content available for gays as I'd expect and what there is is often Japanese/Asian or features young skinny "twink" guys which aren't really my thing.
|
05-18-13 01:19am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I think it's mainly that less women are into porn, so I picked Other.
For the ones that are, any of the other reasons might apply really.
|
05-10-13 11:08am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
I feel bad saying it because I wore glasses since I was 8, but I hated them and never found them sexy on guys. Felt much better and more attractive when I finally got em lasered!
So no I don't much like them on guys in porn, though you very rarely see them anyway.
|
05-08-13 03:18pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes always - I want to know as much about a site as I can. Obviously archived reviews won't be current, so I keep that in mind, but in my experiences sites rarely change all that much in their basic style and ethos and an archived review might contain some useful info the authors of new reviews miss out on.
Obviously if a newer review mentions something has changed since then I'll take note.
|
05-05-13 09:54am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Thanks for the heads up, appreciate it. I'll do some further research on this, you've given me a good explanation to understand the basics of it, which I appreciate,
|
05-04-13 02:37pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Novels and books, I love reading. I'm holding out against eReaders too - I can see the advantages but I am old-fashioned in many ways and I just prefer physical books.
|
05-03-13 04:02am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Oh dear, I didn't even know there was such a thing!
I am a bit cautious though - I used an Ad Blocker once which was wonderfully effective, but also stopped things I wanted without me realising. For example, I use cashback sites whereby if you do your online shopping via their site, you get cashback on your purchases.
Suddenly my purchases stopped tracking and I couldn't figure out why until I guessed it might me that - when I turned it off, the problem went away.
So I tend to live with the ads now.
I suspect a Script blocker might do similiar stuff?
|
05-02-13 02:53pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think my browser (Firefox) comes with one as standard. It seems to block 99% of pop-ups, but one or two porn sites defeat it (that "Live Jasmine" one seems best at by-passing it).
The only non-porn site which seems able to defeat it is TripAdvisor, which always manages to sneak a pop-under past it!
|
05-02-13 10:30am
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Barefoot for me please... looks odd if they're otherwise naked to be wearing anything on their feet.
|
04-29-13 01:42am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I've put "other" because I'd say the majority of the time I've had a good fast response, occasionally I don't. Depends on the site, but most are OK.
It tends to help if you join well-regarded sites using sites like PU as a guide of course.
|
04-27-13 03:35am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
None of them... and I had to Google "hackey sack"! I voted for that though because it looks kinda fun!
|
04-23-13 03:21pm
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Much the same as now I think. I can't see them trying to tighten them up in most countries as it's largely fruitless, but I can't see them taking the time and effort to make them more relaxed either - generally unless there's a big demand for something these things get ignored.
If existing laws are unenforceable they tend to just leave them on the books and pretend they're not there!
|
04-21-13 05:29am
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah, as long as it uses a trustworthy biller and there looks to be good content.
If I liked the content it would be a shame there's no more to come, but it's still there to enjoy what there is.
|
04-19-13 05:08pm
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Sometimes I'll take the plunge - I'd be cautious but if the preview is really good it's hard to resist sometimes.
If the site is new then it's understandable if there's no reviews, but if it's an older site I'd be more suspicious I guess.
I have submitted a few sites to TBP/PU and nominated them for reviews... but ultimately the first review has to come from someone - I've benefited from reviews from others so I have to return the favour!
|
04-17-13 04:42pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like to see flaws - all humans have them! I hate porn which is over-produced and seems airbrushed - to me the sexiness of porn is in its gritty reality. I want to see real people having passionate sex, not flawless models worrying about camera angles and their best side!
|
04-15-13 12:15pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not my cup of tea, never seen the appeal.
It's actually quite rare in gay porn - bit of a niche I guess.
|
04-13-13 08:05am
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I suppose quality of the videos and the freqency of updates. I don't care about pictures.
They basically have to show me enough of a preview to give me a "feel" for the site and leave me wanting more!
|
04-12-13 01:11pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
That's an excellent point Jay G - I too have often found the most expensive sites are disappointing. It's certainly no guarantee of quality - but I'd never really thought about why. Your explanation make a whole lot of sense!
|
04-09-13 03:42pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, always.
It's a part of the whole package after all, you can't ignore it in your overall rating in my opinion. If two sites are identical in quality but one costs double the other, then it would seem odd to give them an equal score to me.
|
04-09-13 03:32pm
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
It'll happen, but not in the next 10 years.
Hell, some people are prepared to have sex with plastic dolls already!
Personally, I'd rather use porn and take matters into my own hands!
|
04-07-13 02:42pm
|
