| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
LOL.... That's Okay, I think I got the picture.
I does appreciate da gesture, though.
|
02-04-13 10:15am
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Titillating stuff, jb.... any more of that you wanna share with us pervs? :-)
|
02-04-13 09:13am
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Otoh said it best. Couldn't agree more.
Interesting poll question. Give the general another star.
|
02-04-13 08:49am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
A regular? (yes)
First place I trex after Ole' Betsy boots up.
although PU is primarily for reviews, I think the forum runs pretty close in popularity.
|
01-29-13 02:57pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
bibo's Poll
Sans the piece on Max Hardcore (cuz I ain't familiar wit' the fellow) I'm otherwise completely in accord with JBerry's comment. Couldn't of expressed it any better.
|
01-25-13 10:43pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
When time passes.
Typically in short increments during most of my waking hours.
|
01-23-13 03:32pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Jus' gimmie a gal who's flat on her back; her dress resting across her upper thighs, giving me only a panty-peek of the crotch area of her full cotton/silk panties.
I wanna see her body in motion ... esp. coming from the hips. I wanna see her pelvis bumping and grinding ... either from being f..ked or doing a convincing solo routine.
I wanna see an un-smiling face expressing a sexual tension thats at least close to believable.
So yes, I'd "generally like to join sites with similar content" IF I CAN EVER FIND ONE WITH THE CONTENT I WANT.
|
01-21-13 05:27am
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't think so ....... but, contrarily, I dare say you'd fail getting said "spouse/significant other" to agree with that on any level.
Is this any more or less cheating than if you're mentally visualizing another partner while you're having sex with "said" 'spouse/significant other?"
|
01-19-13 01:47am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
Sorry 'bout the absent "cock option", Gaypornolover.
Lesson learned!
But should it be of any comfort to our highly valued Gay friends out there, the same can be said effecting all our straight viewers.
To wit ....
Upon close observation, one will notice the choice spelled
p-u-s-s-y wasn't optional to them, as well.
|
01-17-13 04:03pm
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
OK, so I'm a legg-man. Always have been.
The shapelier, fuller and slightly muscle-lined they are, the more attention a pair gams draw from me.
Although I have equal preference for a nice ass, it's how the combo comes together forming that symmetrically round oasis that captures my affections... one accentuates the other.
But legs win in a single run-off.
|
01-17-13 02:16am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Absolutely ......
Many ,however, that I avoided would've been downloaded if I had a dicipherable softwear editing device.... And knew how to use it.
Otherwise, too much stuff to wade through grttin' to the good part.
|
01-15-13 03:36am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
None of the above......
Always and forever = visually superior and anatomically correct. Missionary position reigns.
As for trying sex positions that I've seen in Porn ....
Not hardly. I'm afraid I'm way too old for Porn's new age sexual gymnastics
|
01-13-13 02:27am
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
Did ......then didn't.
did again, then didn't
did a third time, then didn't
Currently, still don't.
Never paid for one. Those that come into my possession were usually gifts, bequeathed, or strangely enough, collateral for loans.
BTW ......
glad to see what I think is jberry's first poll entry...... Neat-o
Get in the habit, Dude
|
01-10-13 01:12am
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I go back occasionally..... and I wish I'd devote the time to do it more regularly, because I'm often delightfully surprised to see that the number of new hits to my old threads continues and some have swollen rather dramatically, which is a great source of satisfaction.
Many times I pick up on interesting stuff I missed from others during the initial postings.
Then there are wonderfully stimulating old threads that really warrants reviving....... and oftentimes should be.
|
01-07-13 04:11pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah, I check it out occasionally.
Lets face it, even animated characters do a better job than a helluva lot of phony crap shoved at us from live ones ... (that is, if you wanna giv'em credit for even having any life).
I call it jus' goin' through the motions.
I figure the key word associated with the existing state of INTERNET PORN could well be termed "complacency".
For As long as the cash-cow doles out the obscene profits piling up in the laps of these porno conglomerates, the longer the industry of porn will sit on its collective asses and stagnate in the status quo.
I'd venture that if the porn purveyors and their bozo-team of incompetences don't shape up and give us better quality, then we might find a hot new genre soon stepping right in ... and maybe for the first time collectively getting the lazy asses of the now seated power-structure to move into gear.
Same goes for dialog-repetitive actresses who still possess a dire vocabulary limitation -- hence finding themselves out beating the bushes looking for a real job.
Of course, these are jus' my opinions .
A little far-out I might admit, in which case we'll simply blame it on senior apathy.
|
01-05-13 01:18pm
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
You're oh-so right guys....
"Annoying", irritating" "etc.," .... all certainly better fit the point of the poll question.
"Offend" was clearly a poor choice of word to use.
Heads-up crowd we have here.
Thanks, all, for settin' the old man straight.
|
01-03-13 10:02pm
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
If a performer is going to use any words in a phase representative to this poll question, then no, I'd rather that she/he just shut-the-hell up.
This is because that kind of expression is so obviously phony, it subtracts the very values
I'm paying to see.
I know they have to give that segment of those who crave that sort of thing enough to appease their selfish appetite, which is OK, but don't just arbitrarily take the easy route and toss it in everything you're marketing.
The word "shit" is so egregiously offensive that the subhuman webmasters who're so brain-damaged and insensitive to its liberal use in a scene's dialog that some form of hurt ought to be put on his damed pocketbook.
Their common sense is so twisted out of kilter and skewed that they don't possess the capacity to give an iota as to how useless its utterance is to good erotica.
|
01-03-13 03:02am
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Permit me, my friend, if you will, to reason that there is indeed a revolving, outspoken, fixed, and determined resolution that remains paramount with your New Year's agenda ..... to wit:
"the continued, laborious search for that mature site with women in lingerie slowly stripping from fully clothed to fully naked."
I rest my case.
|
01-01-13 04:16pm
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah I do.
Namely, to be resolute in not making anymore resolutions.
|
01-01-13 03:43pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
None, of course.
Any time I normally could spend on watching TV, is usually diverted to either being parked on this site or immersed elsewhere in some other area of porn.
|
12-28-12 01:59am
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Well, almost "thrilled."
Usually, I kinda welcome seeing the lucky guy who ultimately gets the action -- doing what I've fantasized doing myself.
|
12-26-12 12:32am
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope!
Among other things, Those kind of themes seem to be a little too contrived for me, too.
|
12-24-12 03:58am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
Think about it?
Why else would I reserve them?
|
12-22-12 07:24pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Makes no nevermind to me.
Holidays no different than any other days.
In fact, if the Pope were in town and dropped by ..........he'd have to talk to me over my shoulder ... while surfing porn at my computer.
|
12-20-12 01:37am
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Useful? Oh yes.
Helpful? Indeed.
You might also add "time-saving." in that we are oftentimes spared scrambling hither and yon doing it the hard way.
|
12-18-12 01:24am
|
