Pay Site Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Stunning 18 (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site with frequent updates.
1255 Models, 3694 Photo Galleries, 1202 videos.
Met Art management and tech support, which is always excellent. |
| Cons: |
Mix of both old and new content. Quality varies, especially with the older content. New content is from Thierry Murrell.
The stuff being recycled from justteensite.com isn’t as high quality as the newer stuff, or the stuff originally posed on this site before the changeover from Antonio Clemens to Thierry Murrell. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is run and supported by MetArt (but not a part of MetArt Network) and where all the material provided here is from Thierry Murrell. When it started up, it was all material sourced from Antonio Clemens.
Updates are quite frequent, ranging from 1 to 4 updates per day. Mostly softcore stuff, but occasional boy-girl and girl-girl. The solo sets are mostly just stripping and posing nude, but some masturbation also appears. To me, the solo, just nude stuff is the best part of the site. But YMMV.
A lot of these sets are clearly older. Models that are now in their 40s are appearing with new sets and looking as young as they did in their first appearances. I’ve been able to confirm that a lot of these sets first appeared on justteensite.com, a site that went under a few years ago. But there is also newer stuff coming in.
“Antonio Clemens” is a pseudonym for Alexander Ovchinnikov. When Stunning 18 first started up, all the stuff appearing on this site was from Antonio Clemens. This guy’s work also appeared elsewhere under the Henry Sharpe pseudonym and Thierry Murrell pseudonym. It’s also true that not everything published under those names was photographed by Alexander Ovchinnikov – so they are sort of an agency name for multiple photographers. (Antonio Clemens is only Alexander Ovchinnikov).
I reviewed this site back in 2018, and was quite a fan of it. Then suddenly, all the new postings stopped, without warning or explanation. A few years later I was looking at the blog on AntonioClemens.com. Around that time in 2018 he posted a screed accusing Met Art (which publishes Stunning 18) of improper behavior and threatening legal action. I assume that legal action did not lead anywhere based on how things have proceeded since then.
So all that stuff up above I’m pretty sure is factual. The following stuff is my speculation. I think when justteensite went under, MetArt bought the content, and is now re-publishing it here at Stunning18. I believe Thierry Murrell was a primary source for the stuff published on justteensite.com. I’m guessing that Alexander Ovchinnikov wanted to be compensated again by MetArt for the stuff purchased from justteensite.com and MetArt countered that no, you got paid the first time, so we don’t need to pay you again. That led to the final rift between Antonio Clemens and MetArt and the site’s new direction.
Anyhow, back to the current situation. Ladies with the most appearances: Martina A (186), Isabella (64), Brigitta F (57), Nicole (56), Yana F (50), Natasha S (49), Irene (48), Melena A (42), Avril A (42), Olya N (36), Anoushka E (33), Annett A (31), Delilah G (30), and Anjelica (28). Irene is a personal favorite of mine who only has a small handful of appearances on any other site.
The standard monthly price is $29.99, and annual are $99.99. The PU discount brings the monthly down to $19.99. Around holidays you can expect to find discounted pricing down to $9.99 a month.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
With any of these satellite sites in the MA network, the general recommendation is to join Met Art first, since it is the flagship site. But if just Met Art alone isn’t enough for you, then Stunning18 would be a highly recommended addition to your subscription package. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. In The Crack (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Looking at reviews I kinda knew what to expect and am not disappointed
This site wants you to know every gorgeous lady on a very personal level
The pictures and videos are worth downloading, every last one of them
It is the first porn site I have joined that does not feel like a porn site in a good way
The site is huge
The models are a definitive pro |
| Cons: |
The vast majority of the scenes are solo
Pricing structure could be confusing |
| Bottom Line: |
I have had this site on a very short list to join when I knew I would have plenty of time to explore, take in, revel in, the women featured on it and that would give me my money’s worth. I just skipped the confusion and joined the Ultimate membership at $69.95. Unlimited downloads, 4K, and giving them some props for using 69 in a fun way.
The models are jaw-droppingly hot. All of them. Everything about the scenes is near perfect. The settings are stunning, the backdrops, the colors, and then you see the woman and she surpasses everything else. This, to me, is what a premium, higher priced porn site should be. You are not going to feel slighted by any part of it. You will, like me, wonder why these models are not on other sites and if they are, why didn’t the other site film them like this?
The quality is everywhere. The pictures are fantastic with colors in the backdrop that brings out the eye color of the models. The bar stools beg for the models to sit on them naked and spread their butt. It is like you can immerse yourself in these scenes and they are not virtual reality, I would call them real reality. Forget that virtual stuff.
You could complain that the scenes are mostly solo, but if you did, you were not focusing on the solo woman enough! I will even opine that is why I paid the price for the ultimate pass. I wanted the membership to feel different. To make me feel like I needed to want to 69 every model to get my $69 worth. And I do.
Navigation is simple and it works. Searching for what to watch or download next is simple. Just start at the top and don’t skip any! I have never felt like the word wow belonged in a porn review until now.
It is true, we all have different taste and however the rest of that saying goes, but I never once on In The Crack, felt like, meh, think I’ll skip that one. She’s not what I’m in the mood for. Not once. I download the videos and pictures and I did not even rush download or mass download. I took my time. Halfway through the first month, I thought, I don’t think I’m going to cancel this. I am one who prefers amateur models. I have trouble believing any of these models are amateur class, but I do not care.
I do believe if you do not want 4K videos, the cheaper options would be acceptable. If you want 4K, the unlimited is the way to go. There is no way you can fully enjoy this content if you are worrying about whether you are going to hit a download limit. It is as different of a site as I have ever joined and accordingly, I approached it differently than I would most sites. Something I thought about as I headed into my 2nd month of membership was, porn is one of the most copycat businesses in the world. In The Crack does not look to have a single copycat. That is why I was willing to pay for a 2nd month. This site does more for me than massive networks even though I do like those. There should have been a wow there. Until I joined In The Crack, I had not been a member of a site that made me feel like the site had the wow factor. In the Crack does. I don’t even know how it could be improved. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Sapphic Erotica (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ A rare mainstream join for me but a good one
+ Lesbian scenes throughout the network
+ Very pretty young women
+ Some more harder scenes than I expected
+ Bonus sites are pretty good
+ Great download options |
| Cons: |
- First 3 weeks of the membership, I was pleased but by the last week of the membership, I was a little bored with the scenes
- The scenes started to feel contrived |
| Bottom Line: |
The holidays threw off my mood for porn. I joined Sapphic Erotica from an email promotion. One thing I will say in a very positive way is how pretty the models are. I did not get the feeling any of them have bad hair days or ever even think they are anything but the prettiest woman in the room they are in. It is meant as a compliment. It did make me initially skeptical of their interest in burying their pretty faces between another woman’s ass cheeks. I was wrong to be skeptical. These young women go at it hot and heavy. I was pleased with that. It was not filthy, raunchy but they gave mostly believable performances.
The site includes bonus sites Give Me Pink, Fist Flush and Sapphix – which I believe is the network home. The bonus sites are very similar to Sapphic Erotica. Give Me Pink does offer more extreme acts and Fist Flush is fisting, but beyond the action, the models are still very pretty and lady-like. My belief was this is lesbian porn made for male enjoyment.
I do not have a problem with that. I have attraction to both genders and believe I can enjoy scenes intended for male viewers. My feeling of the scenes feeling contrived could have even come from the scenes following a similar pattern of positions and the location looking similar from scene to scene. The production is good. I will even accept some fault on my part as I usually prefer much harder scenes.
I would highly recommend this group of sites for anyone who enjoys seeing naked pretty women. You get them in several positions too. The camerawork is good especially in the scissoring sections of the scenes with scissoring. The video downloads are clear and easy on the eyes with softer colors.
It is hard to grade a site just for my enjoyment. I enjoyed the scenes, but there was a repetitiveness as my subscription duration continued. I can see how the site scores high. There are plenty of believable orgasms and the kissing is maybe the sexiest part of the scenes. The scissoring parts are my next favorite.
I may try a few more similar type sites since I feel like I am relatively new to polished lesbian porn. I do watch some on Adult Time, but I have other sites on there I can check out and break the monotony.
I believe a 90 is a fair score. It is clearly a high quality site but may have gotten me at a time when I was being overly-critical and skeptical. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
