Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Sticks with their theme, which is girls in office outfits or uniforms
Lots of topless nudity
Lots of content – 652 models, 1,593 videos, 757,008 images
If you enjoy being teased, you will get plenty of it here
Very well executed site
Both thin and fuller figured ladies
Ages range from teens to forties
Cons:
Not as much full nudity and the nudity that does occur is not explicit at all
Bottom Line:
Only Secretaries is one of the sites in the Only All Sites network. I joined this as a stand-alone site, but it’s also possible to join Only All Sites at a higher price. If you do that, you also get access to Only Tease (the flagship site), Only Silk and Satin, Only Opaques, which are all actively updating and quite large in their own right. These other sites are also included, but no longer updating: Only Costumes, Only Sportswear, Only Carla (solo site), Only Melanie (solo site). This review focuses on Only Secretaries.
The site started up in October 2007 and has been updating regularly since then. Updates come daily, and some times there is a second update on the same day. So you have a big archive plus lots of new material.
As a teasing site focusing on the uniform or office dress style, you will get a number of pictures with the model fully clothed, flirting and showing just a little before going back to SFW. But eventually the clothes do start coming off (at least a little). If you appreciate watching a lady unbutton her blouse, or unzip her skirt, or unhook her bra, then this is the site for you.
The regular price for Only Secretaries is $24.95. 2 months is $44.95, 3 months is $59.95 and 6 months is $99.95. That is the going rate for any of the other sites in the network. Only All sites, starts out at $44.95 for 1 month. If you spend a few minutes poking around on the site, an offer will pop up for the first month at Only All Sites at half price. There are very few other discounts offered here.
One unusual practice is that at the end of a photo set, the model will hold up a package of the stockings or panty hose that she wore for the shoot. One thing less common on this site than an exposed pussy is bare feet. They take their stockings seriously here. Sometimes the feet do get exposed, but that’s only when they are changing socks or stockings and the new ones go on pretty quickly.
One helpful feature is the Site Search, which includes the Nudity Level, which can be Discreetly Nude, Discreetly Topless, Figure Nude, Non-Nude or Topless. Discreetly Topless means the bra does come off, but nipples are not visible, with hands or something else covering those bits. Similar for Discreetly Nude, but the panties come off, and you don’t get a full frontal view.
Even those with Figure Nude are not explicit at all. Legs are very rarely spread open, and there are no close ups between the legs. But you will get at least a glimpse of those fabulous feminine features (most of the time - it seems sets with the model in full pantyhose usually don't take those off). And while I think the classification is generally accurate, it is not 100%.
Using their search, I came up with:
Figure Nude – 1,409 Picture Sets, 407 video sets
Discreetly Nude – 442 picture sets, 63 video sets
Topless – 3,977 picture sets, 1,074 video sets
Discreetly Topless – 204 picture sets, 37 video sets
Non-nude – 127 picture sets, 21 video sets
Here are some examples of other criteria you can search on. You can also combine search terms to really narrow things down. Holdup Stockings – Blue (or whatever color); Breasts – Average, Busty, Enhanced, Natural, Petite; Changing Legwear; Costume – Bunny, Burlesque, Cossack, etc; Boots – Ankle length, knee length, thigh length; Nylons – various colors; Skirts – various lengths or materials
Some models have had quite long careers here. For example Joceline had her first set posted on June 8, 2008 and her most recent was on March 28, 2026, with more on the way.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The first site that made me want to pay for it
Beautiful 18-24 year old females giving oral sex
4k downloads on most of the videos and 1080p on the ones without 4k
The pictures are worth downloading
Comes with Blowpass network Blowpass includes Immoral Live, one of the most unique porn sites I have been a member of
Cons:
Though Blowpass can be joined for very reasonable prices, I think the fact it doesn’t include Adult Time access, will hurt it with some fans
Unless you’re like me and love blowjob porn, the network could be too much of one genre
Bottom Line:
My first site I joined was the Blow Pass network. Only Teen Blowjobs is arguably the best site on Blow Pass and Blow Pass is also owned by Gamma – the company that owns the mega-network Adult Time. When I joined Blow Pass for the first time, I hadn’t heard of Adult Time and thought nothing of it not being included with Blow Pass, or vice-versa.
Only Teen Blowjobs is a near perfect site for me. As someone who is infatuated with pretty women giving blowjobs, it fits every bill and checks every box. The videos are very high quality, 4K is all but standard, the tags used by the site and network are excellent and make finding the scenes you prefer much easier.
While I see Only Teen Blowjobs as the top site on Blow Pass, many talk about Immoral Live. It is the only site included in Blow Pass that isn’t exclusively focused on oral sex. At one time, Immoral Live, was one of the only porn sites with live scenes. The other sites are Throated, 1,000 Facials and Mommy Blows Best.
There is a download limit, but it is the same one most of the Gamma networks have, 300GB in a day, which is logically possible with a fast enough internet connection, but isn’t anything near what I download in a day. The most I have ever downloaded in a day was 25GB.
I am not going to deduct points for Blow Pass not being on Adult Time, but I do think others joining Blow Pass should know ahead of time. I do have a membership to Adult Time and there are a couple dozen Blow Pass scenes included with an Adult Time membership as bonus scenes.
The current membership option has the price for downloads and streaming under $8 and is well worth that, even if you have to join Adult Time separately.
The best part about most of the scenes on Blow Pass and especially – Only Teen Blowjobs, is the scenes have halfway believable plots. It is one of the only oral sites I have joined that at least helped me see the scenes as more than just a blowjob. The scenes do veer slightly away from just oral, but there is always oral.
I keep thinking my membership with Adult Time will stop me from joining Blow Pass, but it hasn’t and I join both on annual memberships. It is hard to pass up this high quality porn for under $100 a year.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of my favourite sites
Top-tier models
POV cameras gives you the feeling of being there
You can download photos and videos
Enjoyable, which is a word I do not associate with porn
A different angle and view of pretty models
Cons:
Patience helps the enjoyment factor, but I would think some do not want to have patience with their porn
For me – outshines all the other sites on the ATK Network
Bottom Line:
I joined the ATK Network about a year ago. It did not explicitly say it included ATK Girlfriends, but it did. I am glad it did. ATK Girlfriends is a very unique porn site that offers an experience unlike any I have had with any other site. The scenes are laid out like the viewer is on a date with the model. The scenes work their way through talking, having a discussion with the model to get to know her and throughout this, the models flirt, bat their pretty eyes and tease. The first few times I watched a model’s scenes, I skipped through to the good parts, but it just seemed like regular porn when I did that.
I started over and took my time watching each segment, even what seemed like the boring or fast-forward parts and ended up feeling like I watched a version of porn I had not ever experienced. This is not a review of the ATK Network, but for anyone considering joining it, try ATK Girlfriends first. I do not know if ATK Girlfriends is regularly included with the ATK Network, but it does not show it being included. I felt like it was completely different from all the other ATK sites.
All ATK sites in my experience have a balanced priority on videos and pictures. ATK Girlfriends goes away from that a little. It is probably 70% video prioritized since the videos are needed to hear what the model is saying to the viewer or date. The models, though lesser known to American porn fans of American sites, are mostly known throughout European porn and some American models are even on here.
One of my concerns with rating this site high is how far away does it go from standard porn? My thinking is a lot or porn fans would probably fast-forward through the slower parts or the parts where the models are dressed or just being normal, however, I think the possibility of a viewer being patient and experiencing the full scene without fast-forwarding offsets the fans who are not patient enough to get the full experience. I also am thinking that in a review will help potential members know what they are getting into ahead of time.
I do not know of any download limits. The videos are high quality and the majority of the women do a very good job of presenting themselves as a woman on a date and not a porn model trying to answer questions they have answered a thousand times before. I do believe this type of porn is extremely nichey. The very basis of traditional porn is challenged in these scenes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A truly impressive site
The main theme is lesbian
Videos and pictures are high quality and downloadable
Frequent updates
Seamless navigation native to the Met Art Network sites
Some of the models are so pretty when dressed, you might not want them to take their clothes off
Cons:
Older scenes, to me, are of higher performance quality, but not as good technical quality, I’m splitting hairs
I wish some scenes were a little longer and more personal
Bottom Line:
Viv Thomas is a name that I have read a lot about and heard a lot of porn reviewers talk about in a very positive light. I can see why. One of the important parts about the site’s quality is it is in the Met Art family or network of sites. Similar to when a site ends up owned or managed by Gamma – the quality goes up and navigation becomes familiar and very simple. The most commonly used compliment with Viv Thomas’ work is based on his love of beautiful, young but legal women. That is easy to see as soon as you enter the member’s pages.
My lead-in con is the most sincere compliment I can give and still see it as a minus. The older scenes, oftentimes, using the same models, had supreme chemistry between the models. It is clear, Viv had his preferred models and they were happy with being in his preferred group. The newer scenes do – to an extent – lack that chemistry, but I might just be seeing chemistry as production ability. I went through the same feeling on sites like DDF and ALS Scan. The newer scenes are far from bad. I would even venture out and say the scenes still offer more chemistry than the majority of porn sites.
The site has very simple and straightforward navigation, including a tab for videos, a tab for photos and a model index to find your favorite models. Each model, once clicked upon, opens up to a page showing all of the model’s scenes. There are 4K downloads on the majority of scenes over the last 8-10 years. You can also download HD resolutions if you prefer. The site has over 2,600 videos and nearly 4,000 photo sets. The photo sets are as good as any on the Met Art network and would be worth the price of a membership.
Even though I usually prefer sites with amateur models, Viv’s site and models are mostly new to me. Most seem to be from Europe. And despite what looks like a softcore site, do not let the lesbian genre or solo women fool you. These scenes are filled with passion, lust and tongues going everywhere. There is a lot of foreplay, even for a lesbian site. Kissing, toys, fingers, and plenty of scissoring.
It’s sites like this one that show how beautiful and passionate porn can be.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The annual price is very reasonable - $50 and it does not automatically renew
The teasing is very good
Much of the teasing happens in public
Very few pussy shots – some might make that a negative
Quality photography and videos
This is the only site like it that I have ever subscribed to
Cons:
I tend to like more full nudity with my soft core
Not every model is a 10 – for some that might be a pro, more girl-next-door types here
Bottom Line:
After reading some of the very enthusiastic reviews for this site, I had to give it a shot. I’m certainly glad that I did. For me it’s not in my top 5 list of sites, but it is still very good, and this is a unique offering in the world of porn.
This site loves to build anticipation, not just within a set, but across sets. Almost always, the first time a girl appears, she stays clothed throughout, except for some flashes here and there. Now you have to wait if you want to see more – and it’s not a sure thing when the next appearance will be. Sometimes it’s a day or two between sets, and I have seen it go over month before the second set appears.
The vast majority of the models are amateurs, but there are more than a few that have done a significant amount of porn work at other sites, both before appearing here and after. The amateurs can range from shy to outgoing. It’s charming when a girl is really trying to decide whether or not to remove the panties. You can also see her exhilaration once they are off and it’s just her and nothing else.
TBP categorizes the site as Non-Nude, and I don’t think I’d agree with that. There is a significant amount of nudity overall, although many sets have none at all. But that’s usually building the anticipation of waiting for the reveal, and really, that’s one of the charms of the site. It’s the “darn, I wish I could see more of her” and then finally getting the chance to do so.
I think in the early days, non-nude might have been an accurate label, but even the photographer says that has changed over time.
From his About:
“Do all these women get completely naked and show everything?
No. I created Zishy with the focus being on tease. Over the years, I have worked with more and more women who are comfortable with nudity, but I still avoid any explicit open-leg material. Bare vagina is beautiful, I just prefer to leave something to the imagination.”
The Pure CFNM network includes 5 other similar themed sites
Downloads are unlimited and HD or better
The network is easy to navigate
I still believe it’s one of the most female-friendly porn networks
Cons:
There is not a lot of sexual intercourse
There is not much plot
Bottom Line:
Pure CFNM is the network and Lady Voyeurs is the site I am focusing on. CFNM porn stands for Clothed Female Nude Male. This niche had something of a heyday a few years back. I do not know if it ever became that popular, but it was better known than it is now. I also do remember the niche being popular with gay male viewers. I do not believe this is a site directed at females or gay males. The males in the scenes receive the pleasure and even though the niche’s acronym says Clothed Females, that rarely holds true for an entire scene. I could be wrong, but believe the niche was popular in the UK before the USA caught on.
The premise of the scenes on Lady Voyeurs is there is a woman who (usually) enjoys watching a man masturbate. I say usually because there has to be some room for the accidental female walking in on a male masturbating and watching instead of stopping him. The females in the scenes vary greatly, from older, heavier set women to college type young women.
The scenes usually progress from the female giving a reason for the male to masturbate in front of her. The guy, of course, agrees. Some even do a halfway decent job of acting like they do not want to and need to be talked into or coerced into doing it. If any performance is under a critical watch it’s the female. Some of the females just sit motionless and smile, flirt a little. Some of the females are almost as quick to get naked or at least show some skin to motivate the male. Despite me seeing these scenes as female-friendly, that is more based on, the males in the scenes are not in the dominant role.
The updates have been steady for years now. There were over 300 new updates over the last 5 years. Besides this, very unique niche Lady Voyeurs offers, there are also scenes on Pure CFNM that have a similar niche, but those give the males a little more control. The network as a whole has a good blend of variations on the CFNM niche.
Pure CFNM and Lady Voyeurs have around 1,600 scenes between them and the other 3 sites have around another 400-500. I think the number is impressive considering it’s not a common or mainstream niche. You also can download high quality videos; the pictures are not as good.
Navigation always matters to a point, but you will probably prefer the variation one of the sites has of the CFNM niche and just focus on a site at a time. I do not join as often as I used to but I do join at least once or twice a year.
I believe it’s a great site for females who are newer to porn and to males with open minds.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The most perfect and harsh reality check for me
Pretty models, slim builds and bald pubes
Outstanding download speeds, options and quality
Picture zips are often large in amount of pictures and the resolution is just as impressive
Teasing masturbation to feverish fisting
The site is run by Met-Art and we receive all the navigational perks they offer
Cons:
As with any site with younger women on the site there occasionally are poor performances
Older scenes not as good of quality
Bottom Line:
That opening pro probably could use some explanation. When I was 18-22, I was a little over 5’ tall and weighed all of 103 pounds. At 43, now, I’m just over 5’ and weigh a whopping 106 pounds. For a long time, I wouldn’t join ALS Scan. I knew about it. I knew the models were probably very similar to how I was when I was an awkward college student. I eventually tried out as an add-on membership to Met-Art and since then, I join it at least once a year.
ALS Scan, in my opinion, is a top 10 all-time porn site. Arguably, even better than Met-Art once Met-Art took over ALS Scan. The site offers a near endless supply of the most feminine, in frame and daintyness, pretty, cute and a weird combination of innocent and naughty models. Watching the videos just to see if a model is going to be more innocent and even awkward or if she’s going to come to life and go wild is just one of the reasons to watch the videos,
The pictures can be a strength for me sometimes. This is one of those times. Watch 4 Beauty is my other favorite when it comes to pictures. The models, while posing, are not posing to the level of the photography sites, but are posing in a nice, middle ground way. Just enough that you know they’re a model, but not enough to make you think their social media account has daily selfies on it.
It’s another strength of ALS Scan’s models. No matter how you have seen these models presented on other sites, they are normal, pretty, girls next door even, at least until they get naked. The action is almost all solo, but there are lesbian scenes and though almost all scenes have strip, teasing, things start to change and vary as some remain cute and innocent, slowly leading into masturbating, which is performed in a standard way or you get the model who it just seems to hit, she’s naked, everyone is watching and she becomes a wild performer. There are extreme insertions, including, but not exclusively, fisting.
I do find myself comparing sites and my porn exploration started with very timid teasing and masturbation. What ALS Scan offers in the more intense masturbation scenes is what I was originally looking for in porn.
As a member you receive practically everything porn fans ask for. Unlimited downloads, up to 4K, downloadable picture zips, attractive models and a very good price, plus the option to join the other Met-Art sites at discounted prices. Last, there are daily updates.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Australian amateur lesbians and solo site
+ This site jumped out at me with the realism
+ Great download options
+ Pictures are some of the best I have seen
+ Scenes do not look to be scripted
+ I have not seen a bad scene
Cons:
- The variety of models could be a con to some
- When there is no scripting, there is little need for a story or plot
Bottom Line:
One of my previous reviews was of a mainstream lesbian site. I liked it, but felt like the authenticity of the lesbian activity could have been questioned. Girls Out West intrigues me for various reasons. I enjoy seeing cultures from around the world being one and my knowledge of Australia is Crocodile Dundee and Steve Irwin. Little did I know there is a very active and even distinct sexual culture there.
One of my favorite parts of any porn is the feeling that the actors or actresses are following instincts and not scripts. Girls Out West very truly made me feel like I was watching two or even more people enjoying sharing their sexual energy with each other. That was enough to get my full attention.
Even though I have learned to look for all the review-worthy features like downloads, resolutions, ease of use and even price – it is very rare for a site to convince me I will not have to rely on my suspension of disbelief to truly enjoy the porn as anything more than just attractive, naked people doing sexual motions.
The models are another strength. There is no set look or body shape for the site to adhere to. There also is no set order of positions or timed positions. I even have questioned if I really wanted realistic porn. There is a side of me that I don’t think would want realistic porn all the time. That is the good news. I have only found a handful of sites that are realistic at least to me. This site is now on that list.
To find cons, I have to look at the site from other people’s perspectives. I believe the variety of models could be a turn-off to some, hopefully, it’s just a small percentage of porn viewers, but I cannot say how big or small that group would be. There also isn’t a set theme, story or plot – other than having sex.
The site doesn’t need all the bells and whistles for me, but they have all the bells and whistles I know of. Excellent download options and quality of downloads, pictures that are varied and not near as posed as most sites. The price isn’t bad. And navigating from the model list is the perfect way to find which scene you are going to watch next.
I believe the main point of the whole review is Girls Out West gave me exactly what I wanted with a non-scripted site and that was going to make all the other features less important, but they met all of my standards on those and then some too. Really great site!
Some of the commenters get annoying when they complain about not enough pussy shots. They need to learn that a woman is more than just the stuff that surrounds a vagina.
Because of the complaining mentioned above, recent years have focused more on pussy shots, with the girls contorting themselves into strange positions to grant the desired view.
This is a softcore or glamcore site, so you are getting very little beyond close-ups (which are not in every scene)
Bottom Line:
I’ve already reviewed a number of sites in the MetArt network, but surprisingly I’ve never reviewed the flagship site. So here’s my take.
If you like looking at beautiful, naked women, this is the site for you. Everything about this site is excellent. The women are beautiful, the photography and videography are high quality, navigation is good, tech support is good. All softcore sites should aspire to be like this one.
Ladies with the most appearances: Suzanna A (139), Candice B (100), Zelda B (85), Anna AJ (82), Clarice (81), Sybil A (81), Sapphira A (79), Mia Sollis (79), Nikia A (77), Sharon E (74). The latest videos are available in 4K, the oldest (from 2000) Top out at 360p SD. For photos, the largest top out at 6720 on the long end.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
NOTE: RABBITS REVIEWS IS CURRENTLY OFFERING A LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP FOR $199. I paid $500 for my lifetime membership in 2017 and couldn’t be happier with it.
Regular pricing for MetArt is $29.99 per month. The standard PU discount is usually $19.99 per month. During the holiday season they are offering a $9.99 special, and that will almost certainly be offered again during major holidays. Over on RR the special price as of today is $5.00 per month.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Ten years since I last joined and I am glad I took a chance on it
Pictures and videos are downloadable and are high quality
No download limits that I found
Even though the models are mature models, their age range spans nearly 50 years
Most major heterosexual niches are covered
Navigation is fluid and intuitive
Cons:
Realizing the difference of age between a 40 year old and 80 year old is twice that of a 20 year old and 40 year old
It’s expensive when compared to the average site, but worth it for a month or two
Bottom Line:
I want to start with the age difference con comment. It really blew my mind when I realized that the “mature” models have as much as 40-45 years difference between the youngest and oldest, while the majority of porn sites only have models 18-24, or a 6 year difference. Even if we expand to 18-30, it’s only a 12 year difference. I do believe the word perspective fits just fine in that comparison. The surprising part is it that the sex doesn’t really change or at least not when being filmed.
The models on mature.nl are a broad and vast collection of ladies from over 4 decades of life. Most of this is becoming more noticeable to me since I am getting up in age. The website itself is easy to use and there are no hurdles whatsoever in the navigation of it. I would call it one of the more user-friendly sites. The downloads are fast to my location in the deep southern United States.
The broad age difference allows the site to offer varying body sizes, hairstyles, looks and to bring it all together on one site. The sexual variety and entertainment is where the site becomes very interesting. Some of the oldest ladies seem to be having more fun and getting more enjoyment than the younger ladies. It makes it to where you have to watch most of the scenes just so you won’t miss an outstanding performance.
I joined this site right at 10 years ago, in 2016, and I liked it, but was newer at online porn subscriptions and didn’t really take in how good the site was. Now that I am experienced, though clearly not as some of the ladies on mature.nl, it is one of the best sites I have been a member of and I usually prefer younger models.
The site’s videos are easily downloaded and nearly all I have downloaded were HD quality. The pictures are as good as I think we should expect. The site has something of an older site feeling, like back in the days when pictures were as important as the videos and their pictures are as important. Everything I have downloaded has been very good.
The site’s price is a little more than we are used to. It is just under $40 once you convert the Euros price to USD. Let it be a show of my happiness with the site when I say I let the membership recur for a second month. With so many niches and genres these days, it almost feels boring to say this site covers all of the niches I prefer.
I’m just glad I remembered to join it again after 10 years away and think I will join it at a much higher frequency in the future.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Engaging and desolate at the same time
+ Every scene and photo set is different
+ Well-trained actresses – believable
+ The models are attractive physically and mentally
+ You will not likely ever find content like this on other sites
+ Everything is exclusive to the site
+ Unique experience which is rare in porn
Cons:
- While there are frequent updates, some are just older scenes that were archived
- Non-BDSM fans or newcomers might not enjoy the humiliation
Bottom Line:
There seems to be many phases of BDSM in porn. Mainstream BDSM can be entertaining, but is rarely convincing. Some sites then take the violence and degradation to every extreme possible. Restrained Elegance does an exceptional job of not only living up to their name, but exemplifying it.
The videos are good at pushing close to an extreme but not quite reaching extremes. The actresses are clearly into BDSM and not just because the site wants to try BDSM scenes. I do believe the BDSM actresses are just like any fetishist and they are highly capable of delivering a performance matching their passion and interest in BDSM.
With that said, Restrained Elegance is not like the typical porn site. There are updates and some of the updates are just older scenes they have archived. There is a full explanation on their site that explains it would not be cost-effective to them to store all the scenes to be downloaded and streamed. I am not technical-savvy enough to know how realistic that is, but the way the site updates does not bother me in a negative way.
I do believe some of the humiliation could be stronger than most porn fans are used to, but I believe fans are getting smarter and more understanding about fetishes. There is an audience and room for new audience members. It just could be off-putting for some. One thing I appreciate about Restrained Elegance is you will never see a model look like she hates what is happening or like she does not want it to happen. This is a fine line that I believe separates Restrained Elegance from other BDSM sites.
The pictures are a major part of the site. These picture sets can be downloaded and show everything from the beauty of the models to the bondage contraptions in still photography. There are stories being told in both the pictures and videos. It truly makes for a unique experience in the BDSM genre. The videos are HD quality when downloaded and are enjoyable if you are into BDSM.
The site itself is a bare-bones site. Depending on the user, that can be good or indifferent. The site does make me feel like they are more dependent on the quality of the content than bells and whistles. Though, bells and whistles may show up as bondage accessories.
I do consider myself a BDSM fan and join this site about once a year. If you really like the content, a more frequent subscription could be the choice for you since it will open up more of the archived sets to you. Did I miss on making the analogy of the name Restrained Elegance in comparison to the way they update with archived scenes, kind of restrained but the scenes are always elegant.
It is a very good site. The biggest complaint against it is you do not get all their scenes.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Shady Spa is one of the included sites with the Nookies network
The network includes access to 20+ sites focused mostly on handjobs
You can download and stream the videos
Playful porn, not unlike Team Skeet and even Bang Bros
Models are cute and pretty
Navigation is standard but that is all that’s needed
Cons:
Older scenes are lower quality
Not much story in any of the scenes
Bottom Line:
Shady Spa is part of the bigger Nookies network. The Nookies network doesn’t look to reinvent the wheel or to even present a story. The scenes are straightforward, you take a naked, pretty female, usually in their early 20s and put a penis in her hand and the end. I am not trying to take away from the network at all. There are times where this type of porn is appreciated. Other networks have made long careers out of this happy go lucky type of porn and honestly, it is entertaining.
There are over 20 sites in the Nookies network and the majority are handjob or cumshot focused. There are some sexual intercourse scenes. The navigation works well unless you complicate it and it is possible to complicate it, so don’t.
Some of the sites have been around as long as I have been reviewing porn and while though scenes are in lesser quality, some of the performances are actually quite better than the newer scenes. While the network can feel lackluster, it really shouldn’t.
The newer sites like Shady Spa, have high quality downloads and the scenes are generally good. The models are better looking in the newer scenes as well. There should be a mention of the younger and older niche. I am sure there is a large older men audience for the younger women giving the older men a handjob.
The positives start to overpower the negatives when you see the downloads are unlimited. And Shady Spa, for example, has a new update every week. There are other sites updating. Not surprisingly, one of the best looking sites they have on the network is their own original scenes. These are also updating weekly.
What I think the network does best is a focus on covering as many niches as possible.They have a hardcore, creampie site called Breed Me, a “mom” blowjob site, even a granny blowjob site, and from there they cover almost every niche you can think of.
I enjoyed the monthly subscription and would recommend it, but I don’t think I would stay for longer than a month at a time. The lack of stories would normally be a big negative for me, but there really are times where I get away from the need of plots. I think if you’re not interested in stories you will get as much out of a subscription to Nookies as any other network.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large site with frequent updates.
1255 Models, 3694 Photo Galleries, 1202 videos.
Met Art management and tech support, which is always excellent.
Cons:
Mix of both old and new content. Quality varies, especially with the older content. New content is from Thierry Murrell.
The stuff being recycled from justteensite.com isn’t as high quality as the newer stuff, or the stuff originally posed on this site before the changeover from Antonio Clemens to Thierry Murrell.
Bottom Line:
This site is run and supported by MetArt (but not a part of MetArt Network) and where all the material provided here is from Thierry Murrell. When it started up, it was all material sourced from Antonio Clemens.
Updates are quite frequent, ranging from 1 to 4 updates per day. Mostly softcore stuff, but occasional boy-girl and girl-girl. The solo sets are mostly just stripping and posing nude, but some masturbation also appears. To me, the solo, just nude stuff is the best part of the site. But YMMV.
A lot of these sets are clearly older. Models that are now in their 40s are appearing with new sets and looking as young as they did in their first appearances. I’ve been able to confirm that a lot of these sets first appeared on justteensite.com, a site that went under a few years ago. But there is also newer stuff coming in.
“Antonio Clemens” is a pseudonym for Alexander Ovchinnikov. When Stunning 18 first started up, all the stuff appearing on this site was from Antonio Clemens. This guy’s work also appeared elsewhere under the Henry Sharpe pseudonym and Thierry Murrell pseudonym. It’s also true that not everything published under those names was photographed by Alexander Ovchinnikov – so they are sort of an agency name for multiple photographers. (Antonio Clemens is only Alexander Ovchinnikov).
I reviewed this site back in 2018, and was quite a fan of it. Then suddenly, all the new postings stopped, without warning or explanation. A few years later I was looking at the blog on AntonioClemens.com. Around that time in 2018 he posted a screed accusing Met Art (which publishes Stunning 18) of improper behavior and threatening legal action. I assume that legal action did not lead anywhere based on how things have proceeded since then.
So all that stuff up above I’m pretty sure is factual. The following stuff is my speculation. I think when justteensite went under, MetArt bought the content, and is now re-publishing it here at Stunning18. I believe Thierry Murrell was a primary source for the stuff published on justteensite.com. I’m guessing that Alexander Ovchinnikov wanted to be compensated again by MetArt for the stuff purchased from justteensite.com and MetArt countered that no, you got paid the first time, so we don’t need to pay you again. That led to the final rift between Antonio Clemens and MetArt and the site’s new direction.
Anyhow, back to the current situation. Ladies with the most appearances: Martina A (186), Isabella (64), Brigitta F (57), Nicole (56), Yana F (50), Natasha S (49), Irene (48), Melena A (42), Avril A (42), Olya N (36), Anoushka E (33), Annett A (31), Delilah G (30), and Anjelica (28). Irene is a personal favorite of mine who only has a small handful of appearances on any other site.
The standard monthly price is $29.99, and annual are $99.99. The PU discount brings the monthly down to $19.99. Around holidays you can expect to find discounted pricing down to $9.99 a month.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
With any of these satellite sites in the MA network, the general recommendation is to join Met Art first, since it is the flagship site. But if just Met Art alone isn’t enough for you, then Stunning18 would be a highly recommended addition to your subscription package.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Looking at reviews I kinda knew what to expect and am not disappointed
This site wants you to know every gorgeous lady on a very personal level
The pictures and videos are worth downloading, every last one of them
It is the first porn site I have joined that does not feel like a porn site in a good way
The site is huge
The models are a definitive pro
Cons:
The vast majority of the scenes are solo
Pricing structure could be confusing
Bottom Line:
I have had this site on a very short list to join when I knew I would have plenty of time to explore, take in, revel in, the women featured on it and that would give me my money’s worth. I just skipped the confusion and joined the Ultimate membership at $69.95. Unlimited downloads, 4K, and giving them some props for using 69 in a fun way.
The models are jaw-droppingly hot. All of them. Everything about the scenes is near perfect. The settings are stunning, the backdrops, the colors, and then you see the woman and she surpasses everything else. This, to me, is what a premium, higher priced porn site should be. You are not going to feel slighted by any part of it. You will, like me, wonder why these models are not on other sites and if they are, why didn’t the other site film them like this?
The quality is everywhere. The pictures are fantastic with colors in the backdrop that brings out the eye color of the models. The bar stools beg for the models to sit on them naked and spread their butt. It is like you can immerse yourself in these scenes and they are not virtual reality, I would call them real reality. Forget that virtual stuff.
You could complain that the scenes are mostly solo, but if you did, you were not focusing on the solo woman enough! I will even opine that is why I paid the price for the ultimate pass. I wanted the membership to feel different. To make me feel like I needed to want to 69 every model to get my $69 worth. And I do.
Navigation is simple and it works. Searching for what to watch or download next is simple. Just start at the top and don’t skip any! I have never felt like the word wow belonged in a porn review until now.
It is true, we all have different taste and however the rest of that saying goes, but I never once on In The Crack, felt like, meh, think I’ll skip that one. She’s not what I’m in the mood for. Not once. I download the videos and pictures and I did not even rush download or mass download. I took my time. Halfway through the first month, I thought, I don’t think I’m going to cancel this. I am one who prefers amateur models. I have trouble believing any of these models are amateur class, but I do not care.
I do believe if you do not want 4K videos, the cheaper options would be acceptable. If you want 4K, the unlimited is the way to go. There is no way you can fully enjoy this content if you are worrying about whether you are going to hit a download limit. It is as different of a site as I have ever joined and accordingly, I approached it differently than I would most sites. Something I thought about as I headed into my 2nd month of membership was, porn is one of the most copycat businesses in the world. In The Crack does not look to have a single copycat. That is why I was willing to pay for a 2nd month. This site does more for me than massive networks even though I do like those. There should have been a wow there. Until I joined In The Crack, I had not been a member of a site that made me feel like the site had the wow factor. In the Crack does. I don’t even know how it could be improved.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ A rare mainstream join for me but a good one
+ Lesbian scenes throughout the network
+ Very pretty young women
+ Some more harder scenes than I expected
+ Bonus sites are pretty good
+ Great download options
Cons:
- First 3 weeks of the membership, I was pleased but by the last week of the membership, I was a little bored with the scenes
- The scenes started to feel contrived
Bottom Line:
The holidays threw off my mood for porn. I joined Sapphic Erotica from an email promotion. One thing I will say in a very positive way is how pretty the models are. I did not get the feeling any of them have bad hair days or ever even think they are anything but the prettiest woman in the room they are in. It is meant as a compliment. It did make me initially skeptical of their interest in burying their pretty faces between another woman’s ass cheeks. I was wrong to be skeptical. These young women go at it hot and heavy. I was pleased with that. It was not filthy, raunchy but they gave mostly believable performances.
The site includes bonus sites Give Me Pink, Fist Flush and Sapphix – which I believe is the network home. The bonus sites are very similar to Sapphic Erotica. Give Me Pink does offer more extreme acts and Fist Flush is fisting, but beyond the action, the models are still very pretty and lady-like. My belief was this is lesbian porn made for male enjoyment.
I do not have a problem with that. I have attraction to both genders and believe I can enjoy scenes intended for male viewers. My feeling of the scenes feeling contrived could have even come from the scenes following a similar pattern of positions and the location looking similar from scene to scene. The production is good. I will even accept some fault on my part as I usually prefer much harder scenes.
I would highly recommend this group of sites for anyone who enjoys seeing naked pretty women. You get them in several positions too. The camerawork is good especially in the scissoring sections of the scenes with scissoring. The video downloads are clear and easy on the eyes with softer colors.
It is hard to grade a site just for my enjoyment. I enjoyed the scenes, but there was a repetitiveness as my subscription duration continued. I can see how the site scores high. There are plenty of believable orgasms and the kissing is maybe the sexiest part of the scenes. The scissoring parts are my next favorite.
I may try a few more similar type sites since I feel like I am relatively new to polished lesbian porn. I do watch some on Adult Time, but I have other sites on there I can check out and break the monotony.
I believe a 90 is a fair score. It is clearly a high quality site but may have gotten me at a time when I was being overly-critical and skeptical.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of my favourite tease and JOI sites and network
You can join one of the sites for a great price or bundle their 6 sites for an equally great long term subscription
Joining all 6 sites gives you access to Upskirt Jerk and Downblouse Jerk, those two alone are worth the extra price
The sites navigate marvelously
Daily or more updates
The scenes stick to the niches and fetishes
Cons:
Joining all 6 sites will cost you $30 a month for 6 months, which is $180. You can join all 6 for 3 months for $40 a month which is $120
It is a lot of teasing
Bottom Line:
I am going to focus on the price for just a second. For whatever reason, business model, works better that way, etc… There is not an option to join all 6 sites for just 1 month. You can, however, join one of the sites for one month and currently the price is $14.95. Speaking for myself, joining WankItNow, Downblouse Jerk or Upskirt Jerk for one month for $15 is a great deal. But if you have not been a member of any of their sites, the multi-month network is a great price too. You get WankItNow, Downblouse Jerk, Upskirt Jerk, Bopping Babes, Lingerie Tales and Real Bikini Girls for $30 for 6 months or $40 for 3 months. You do have to pay the total prices which are $180 and $120 respectively. The problem, if there is one, I do not consider Lingerie Tales or Real Bikini Girls to be anything more than good sites at best. Bopping Babes is good to great. The other 3 are all great. I believe the best way to start out is joining those 3 one at a time for $14.95 a month, then see if there is enough on those to spring for a 3 or 6 month subscription.
WankItNow is an extraordinary site for fans of tease and JOI. There are daily updates, models of most levels of attractiveness and the scenes stick to the fetish. The woman has made it her goal to make you masturbate. Every scene could be different. Some of the women will stay dressed longer, others will tease more, but all want you to masturbate. I believe it is a niche (JOI) not catered to enough. The teasing part is more common in porn, but it usually leads directly to a model having sex or masturbating herself. There is a gray area there in JOI. I have thought why is she not showing more? It is not as scripted or even timed as scenes we see on most porn sites. You have to watch the scenes, enjoy or suffer, through the teasing and that is where this niche excels for me.
Downblouse Jerk is as fetish-orientated as any site. These scenes focus on women in tight shirts, loose shirts, showing down their shirts while doing everyday tasks. You may see one model doing housework or cooking, one may be at the office using the printer, it does favour the viewer either having been in these situations or capable of imagining themselves there watching the model.
Upskirt Jerk is what it says. It is a camera filming up women’s skirts. Some are clearly for your sexual arousal, others may try to look less staged and do a good job of that. Those three are all excellent sites.
Bopping Babes is pretty women dancing around for your viewing pleasure.
Lingerie Tales and Real Bikini Girls are not as interesting to me but they could be to others.
The first 3 sites are large sites and to my surprise upon my most recent subscription there are 8K downloads. I do have a 4K monitor, but am like many, only the best scenes are worth the 4K download. I do not have 8K viewing capability; I cannot comment on the quality of those, but I am sure it is very high. I did join the 6 sites for 3 months as I am a fan of Bopping Babes and that gives me 4 sites I am a big fan of for $120. I believe for a newer member joining one site at a time for $15 a month is probably the better deal.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of three sites I keep an annual membership to
Fits the sometimes less is more motto, despite moving to a more explicit style of photos
One of my favourite sites for photographs. You can download them in zip files
The videos show the less is more side. It’s not less clothes or teasing, it’s less explicitness.
Search engine works well, but can be exhaustive due to changing model names
A membership is a good way to access low prices to the other Met-Art sites
Cons:
It is difficult to say some could see the content as boring knowing I join an annual membership, but I have to believe some people see Met-Art as too artsy and tame.
The model names, often repeated from model to model and it is difficult to keep up with which one is which
Bottom Line:
Met-Art in my opinion is going to be the most subjective site and review of a site. Objectively, there just is not much if anything to complain about. The site updates 4 times a day and has been around for nearly 30 years. If you believe sites try too hard to fix a formula that is not broken, you should try Met-Art out. The only major change I know of is the content became more explicit. The earlier decade or two the pictures and video would not show the pink area of the women. Over the last decade, the pink area has been shown and it’s my opinion, it was not a major change. The models are younger than most porn sites we are used to in 2026. There is more of an innocence to the photos and videos.
My opinion is I like both the old way and the newer way. The attraction for me was the innocence of the models which is still there even if they are showing pink. The change to showing pink also led to Met-Art developing the site Met-Art X, Sex Art and they took over or purchased ownership of other similarly focused sites.
The winning formula has not changed. Maybe it has expanded, but the basics of their photo shoots and videos is still based around pretty models being feminine and most of them are better at teasing than showing everything. The navigation is seamless and as simple as you want or you can make the searches difficult by trying to keep up with the number of models with the same name. There is a decided artsy style to the content just not as extensive as it used to be. Maybe exclusively is a better word?
I join the annual membership and have a method to my searching madness. I just check the new updates. There is a model list and if you’re able to search that way, I give you kudos! No one probably believed having this much content would be a bad thing and it’s not, but it can and does become overwhelming even for someone who has been a yearly member for 5 years. You have to find your way to navigate the site. I believe there could be 4 or maybe 5 ways.
The photos are large and I have found some sets do not have as many photos in them as I would like, but I believe that is just my own greediness! The videos have long been a debating point by fans. I do not download all and couldn’t tell you how many are more than just videos of the photo shoots, but it strengthens the point of this site being photo focused.
If you are a video-only fan I do not believe you will be that happy with the site. But, I would welcome being wrong. It has a lot of traits we do not get enough of in porn. There is consistency I believe is unmatched. There is a quality that will be hard to match. While the models are not exclusive to Met-Art, it’s hard to believe you will find this many high level models on one site.
You also can join the other sites Met-Art owns or manages for excellent promo prices.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beautiful girls, beautifully photographed.
All the good navigation and tech support you can expect from a Met Art network site.
A very fine soft core site.
More than enough good stuff to justify a monthly membership
Cons:
Recent changes make it indistinguishable from the sister sites DOMAI, Erotic Beauty, or Errotica-Archives.
Only 2 updates a week, on Monday and Friday.
Bottom Line:
This is a very enjoyable soft core site. I last reviewed this site in 2018, and not a lot has changed. The biggest change is the less frequent updates, but the overall style of the site is basically the same.
Years ago, this was a sister site to DOMAI, which was run by Eolake Stubblehose. DOMAI was a very tame site, basically the tamest site you could have with full nudity. Goddess Nudes was largely created as a place to show some of the slightly more explicit shots, where the girls opened their legs. As Eolake’s health failed, he sold both sites to Met Art. For a few years the 2 sites continued following that pattern, and both sites updated 5 days a week.
At some point, this changed. Updates went down to 2 per week on each site. In addition, the four sister sites of DOMAI, Goddess Nudes, Errotica-Archives, and Erotic Beauty became indistinguishable from each other. Then during Covid, the four sites were used to post some older stuff that had never made it to being published. That wasn’t a bad thing, because a lot of these sets were more than good enough for publishing. But then they would push out some other photos from the same shoot to a different site. Sometimes that even happened a third time. At least each time they published the photos were slightly different from each other, but this was really milking it, in my opinion.
If you’ve never joined here before, there is a lot of good stuff to peruse. No download limits or DRM, and good speeds most of the time. (Some times the sites will slow down and even stop, but after an hour or two everything is back to normal).
3,110 photo galleries, 1,279 models, 162 artists
No videos at all, except for the “Staff Selections”, which are an extra charge.
Met Art does offer lifetime memberships on its company owned sites (including Goddess Nudes), running from $500 per site. You do need to join one of the network sites first to be presented this option – it never appears on the general sign-up page. But once you have joined one site you can either upgrade that one to lifetime or pick a different one. As an incentive they also will throw in a one-year membership to any other site in the network.
Monthly memberships run $29.99, and annual memberships are $99.99. The PU discount is typically $19.99. During holiday periods (like Christmas, Valentine’s Day, Easter, etc.) the site is usually discounted to $9.99 a month. For 10 bucks this is a worthwhile join for anybody that likes this content. 30 bucks a month is pricey for the value.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is a HUGE site. There are remastered scenes here, but there are 246 pages of scenes with 30 scenes per page - so over 7000 PLUS Bonus scenes from other Grooby sites - just a mammoth collection that includes virtually every important trans performer of the past couple of decades plus a whole lot of performers that would be exclusive to this site. Updates are consistent -5 new scenes per week with downloads on new scenes available up to 2160p. It's a Grooby site. Grooby sites are all very professionally run. Joining, cancelling, communicating with the company if you need to, should not be a problem. If you want to plumb the archives, those scenes will work as well, though of course they will be at lesser resolution. Each new scene also comes with a photo set so photo fans are taken care of.
Cons:
This is purely a personal preference. I'm not the biggest fan of a lot of their models. A lot of their models are not attractive to me. Saying that, I'll go back to the Pros & say that a site with 7000 PLUS scenes that has a lot of performers I'm not attracted to is also going to have quite a number of scenes with models that I am attracted to - and since there are so many models exclusive to this site, you can spend lots of time roaming the site to find those attractive models - yeah, this is as "con" as I can get about this site - oh, and it's not a cheap site. I joined with their Black Friday special.
Bottom Line:
Bottom line is that if you are interested in trans porn, this site is ABSOLUTELY worth a join - immense collection, regularly updated, Bonus sets, included, well run site by a reputable company - I should mention one of my favorite tools for finding models I would very likely otherwise miss - one of the options under "Scenes" is "Random Scenes" - click on that and the site will generate a number of scenes. It's very rare that 1 of those scenes won't be appealing to me and often it's a model I never heard of before and often it's a model who has multiple scenes here. They have other tools & tabs that can help you find scenes you may particularly like such as a "hardcore scenes" button if you're looking for those "Scenes You Might Have Missed", "Top Rated" & "Trending Scenes" tabs for helping you find material that you'll enjoy. I gave it an 80 based on my tastes in their models but clearly there a lot of good things to say about this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ A fun and sexy transsexual site featuring longtime male pornstar Christian XXX
+ You can download videos and photosets
+ More categories and niches than I knew TS had in it
+ Easy site to maneuver
+ Large site with weekly updates
+ The scenes are more involved than I usually see in the TS genre
Cons:
- It is a little pricey for a single site, which means no bonus sites or network sites
- As much as I like Christian in these TS scenes, he really does not match the personality I have for a male in TS scenes.
Bottom Line:
The first time I saw this site being advertised; I had to join it. While I would not say I have a huge interest in Christian XXX, I will say his open-mindedness and willingness to explore sexuality is a major turn-on. I remember seeing a behind the scenes video where he talked about his interest and attraction to transsexuals. It was genuine and sincere to me.
That lays a good foundation for this site. The scenes, unlike many TS sites, do have some story, plot and even reasoning to them. A lot of the scenes have a more playful, kind, funny feel to them and I like that. TS porn is usually black or white. This site does a very good, respectable job of finding some in-between areas.
I did list the weekly updates as a pro, but make note, the site is not updating as regularly as it used to. The updates, while weekly, are only one update per week. When I was a member awhile back there were two new updates every week. I still view the weekly update as a pro because this is a large site in a not common niche.
You may think TS is a relatively common genre, but these scenes add a niche to the genre. These scenes take a masculine man and often have him in the bottom position with a transsexual. I have not seen a lot of content with that combination. When you add the better plots you do get scenes I do not think any site matches.
The resolution of the video downloads is high and you can download the photosets. Videos are in the 25-35 minute range and most photosets have over 200 photos in them. I believe the length of the video scenes is as long as I have seen on TS sites and attribute that to the better plots and fun stories.
There are nearly 500 TS models on the site and most are very attractive.
I do want to reiterate the price is a little high at $29.95 per month, but it is becoming common for high quality TS sites to be higher priced than other genres. I usually just join one site per month so I do not mind the price as much as others might.
I do believe this site does a good job of pushing the TS genre forward closer to the mainstream by having a well-known male pornstar in the scenes. The newer scenes are also quite a bit better than the older scenes. I can see the improvements. This was my third time joining as a member and I am just as happy with the site now as I was the first time I joined it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Outstanding casting site includes Net Video Girls and NetGirl
Unlimited downloads
Nearly all amateurs or were at the time of the scene
Models are pretty and some may become pros
Good, long, videos
Seamless navigation between their sites
Cons:
As is the nature of amateur porn, you find a model you like, but they stopped filming after one scene
Camerawork can be questionable
Bottom Line:
Casting sites, to my knowledge, became popular long before casting was a genre in porn. Several European producers regularly presented their new models in casting type scenes. The genre, as it is viewed in sites like this one, does require the viewer to have at least a little sense of humor. I mean really, this many women on the same couch and none suspected it was the beginning of a porn scene? Maybe sense of humor is not the right term, but a suspense of disbelief fits better. It is – for lack of better words, a simpler form of porn. The story is built-in such as, an unsuspecting, gorgeous young woman shows up at a studio, eyes the leather couch and seduces her right out of her clothes and directly into a spread eagle!
As simple as this type of porn is, it is seemingly more difficult to find a cameraman who can hold their focus. It is one of my favourite parts of casting porn. Casting Couch HD does a great job of presenting us with stunningly attractive models. Women we might see on the public transit and go home wondering if we can remember what she looked like and if we will see her the next day.
Two sites are included: Net Video Girls and Net Girl. These sites along with Casting Couch HD are navigated together and seamlessly without any common navigational problems networks present. The sex on these sites varies from solo, teasing, man/woman hardcore and blowjob. The scenes can reach up to around the 60 minute mark, but some are shorter. It is common for the scenes to be long without much filler.
Downloads are unlimited and of excellent quality. Some traits you will not find much of include stories and plots. The plot is that she's new to porn and the bloke behind the camera and microphone is going to try and talk her out of her clothes. Insert a laugh there because he has money in his pocket. What I notice most that I do like is how many of the women smile and seem genuinely excited about being in a porn video. A fairly high percentage of the ladies even seem aroused before they reach nudity.
It is one of the more believable forms of porn and my one con comes into play here. Some of these women shoot their scene, they get their jollies off and you will never see them on the screen again. The included sites are more than just bonus sites. The sites are extensions of the Casting Couch HD content and are really just like having new scenes.
The looks of the models is my favorite part. Most of the models really are like the women next door, but just a little prettier and more naked. Very good site for amateur lovers.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I have been joining some old favorites lately and Porn Pros is my current subscription
Classic network with 20 different sites each with their own theme
Everything is downloadable and good quality
Navigation fits into the classic network format, could be better but is okay
The variance from site to site is outstanding
A couple of the sites were my first introduction to specific genres
Cons:
I could be wrong on this but some of the sites seem to have shrunk
Some ads and upsells
Bottom Line:
Porn Pros kind of disappeared from my porn radar. I found them while visiting another old favorite and decided to give them a month subscription. The site I remember being a big deal – at one time – Jurassic Cock, is still on Porn Pros, but it is one that seems to have shrunk. Jurassic Cock was my introduction to older man, younger female porn and I remember thinking how glorious it was. It’s probably not the biggest compliment to say I was thinking if these old, ugly guys can get those women, so can I! The Jurassic Cock scenes are still very good. I just thought there were more of them.
But Jurassic Cock is far from the only good site on the network. Public Violations is one of the very best exhibitionism and voyeurism sites. Even if protected and a little contrived. It wouldn’t be a classic network if it didn’t have humorous scenes. There is a small site on the network called Cumshot Surprise. It is as silly as it sounds and worth a pause to laugh out loud. Cock Competition reminded of one of the negatives some people found with the network. There are some uses of dildos as “real” dicks and the cum shoots out by the bucket load. I understand why some people might not like those scenes, but I always enjoyed laughing at those scenes. Porn Pros didn’t stop at those two sites known for fake dicks and fake cum, they also have the site Freaks of Cock, which has scenes that made fans question what was real and what was fake.
There are also more traditional sites like Real ExGirlfriends that are supposed to be self-shot scenes submitted by brokenhearted males. Those scenes are very good as long as you can convince yourself the scenes really are real. They also feature a site called 18 Years Old, that brings to life all of our fantasies about barely legal young women reaching womanhood. A site I really liked and still do is Teen BFF. It is one of the better threesome sites I have been a member of.
Even with a paragraph of the unbelievable and possibly fake scenes above and one of the more realistic, we still have one of those sites that brought some controversy called Massage Creep. I do remember it as being the first massage porn I remember seeing. The scenes are simply a male massaging a female and turning the massage into sex. I am positive their use of the word “creep” brought negative attention to it. Several massage sites showed up with a similar basis but not as much negativity. There is Cruelty Party which was probably a known mistake before they shot the first scene, but there are dozens of scenes on it to draw your own conclusion.
There are other smaller sites that either didn’t do well or failed thanks to the name of the site like Disgraced18 and Pimp Parade. While Flexible Positions, a very intriguing niche, didn’t get many scenes but the ones they have are excellent.
Part of my reasoning for a good score is you can read this and see how different their niches are. Every site feels like its own site and not just part of a network. Seven of the sites have at least 250 scenes on them and one is over 800. If any of these niches interest you, you’re going to get a lot of scenes to your liking. One reason I do believe I enjoyed my subscription so much is I had none of the content downloaded and saved from past memberships. It was like being a completely new member. I highly recommend it.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Stunningly beautiful women. Really stunning.
Very high quality photography
Lots of variation in locales. Many of the pictures would be interesting on their own even if there wasn’t a beautiful naked woman also in the picture.
Billing is via ccBill. PayPal is also an option.
480,211 images and 811 videos.
Cons:
Updates are only every other day. Also, some shoots are divided in 2, so it kind of feels almost like they are 4 days apart.
Bottom Line:
One of the best softcore sites anywhere, with a large catalog. The models are all stunningly beautiful. Almost all of them probably come from Eastern Europe.
They must be doing something right to keep their models happy, as some of them have really large portfolios, and several of the ones on this list are still active. For example: Stefani (226 photo sets, 16 videos), Karissa Diamond (102 phot sets, 128 videos), Anya (177 photo sets, 13 videos), Alisa (137 photo sets, 46 videos), Talia (166 photo sets, 7 videos), Avery (143 phot sets, 10 videos), Lana Lane (135 photo sets, 6 videos), Lilya (138 photo sets, 5 videos), Aristeia (134 Photo Sets, no videos), Maria (129 photo sets, 1 video), Mila (96 photo sets, 18 videos), Aria (105 photo sets, no videos. You might know these ladies by other names – this site seems to select names that are unique to this site (that is more true for the models that appeared earlier in this site’s history).
All the videos since 2011 are available in 1920x1080. Older videos are in lower resolution, but would have been state of the art at the time they were released. The oldest set on the site dates from 9/9/2003, so there is a lot to look at here.
If I had to pick one site as having the very best photography, this would be the one. It only updates about 1/8 as much as Met Art, or half as much as Femjoy, but on a one-picture-at-a-time basis I’d give this one the top marks.
I do wish they had daily updates, or if not that, at least stop splitting a shoot into two posts.
Pricing starts at $29.95 for one month, $59.95 for 3 months, or $99.95 for a year. I have not seen any deviation from that pricing for quite some time. So if you’re waiting for a discount I’m not sure that one will ever come.
Going to daily updates would bump their score to 95. But even as it now stands, I am quite happy with my annual membership and plan to renew when the time comes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It’s an interesting and sexy tgirl mostly with tgirls site
Grooby owned and comes with all the high quality expected from Grooby
HD and 4K downloads
Large site with around 900 scenes
Roughly 2 updates per week
Very easy site to get around on
Cons:
The real blurring of the gender lines. Not really a con to me but could surprise some people
Scenes are similar
Bottom Line:
Transsexual porn has come a long way, but it’s possible all the different gender identities are blurring the gender lines a little too fast for us to keep up with. While the site does mostly advertise as tgirls with tgirls, there are also masculine men in some of the scenes and some of these tgirls are more feminine than some of the women we see in porn.
I do find it interesting in the sense that of all the porn genres I have experienced, the one that hasn’t made major strides is this one. Transsexual, tgirl, shemale, transgender are all different, some much more different than the others, but other than a few physical characteristics separating the descriptors there is not much difference in the world of porn.
The main point I’m driving home is that years ago, transsexual alone was enough to sell memberships to porn sites. It also was enough to turn some away. I’m not insinuating porn producers are lazy, but the actual scenes on transsexual sites have not changed much over the last 7-10 years. I do feel like there is a big lost oppurtunity. How about a scene with a married couple who are looking to spice up their marriage and invite a transsexual to join in? Maybe even jump over to the rarely touched upon female to male transition? Transsexual porn in 2025, in my opinion, is to appeal to straight men who maybe are bored with regular heterosexual relationships.
The Grooby sites besides being known as a leader in transsexual porn sites are also sticking to a very basic formula of transsexual with transsexual or transsexual with promoted as a straight male. I do believe Grooby could branch out for just a few scenes of blending in some females. It wouldn’t be the first time or anything groundbreaking, but it would promote transsexual as something more than just a new porn genre.
I wouldn’t even mention those possibilities if not for this site being a fantastic site. The videos are not only around 900 total, but the scenes are also long and more involved than the average transsexual scene. There are also great picture sets with 200-400 pictures included in each set. I just believe the genre needs a new twist to it. I am sure that years ago someone had the idea to start putting females with females and males with males.
The quality of this site makes it a perfect site to take some minor chances. I have entire folders of transsexuals with women and a select few scenes of a transsexual with a straight man and his girlfriend. I am from the belief that porn is more about fantasy than reality and believe there is a market for expanding the gender roles in porn.
The scenes are well-produced and the picture sets are thorough. With 2 updates a week and around 900 scenes available there is a lot of forward momentum with this site. I had pulled away from outside the box porn sites over the last 6 months, but I am glad I chose this site to be the one to reintroduce me to transsexual porn. It is one of the best I have been a member of and I am hoping they continue improving the genre and looking towards new focuses of the scenes.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of the oldest internet porn sites
Large collection of videos with either up to HD download or 4K
Bonus sites included are more like niche material
Picture sets are some of the best and downloadable
No download limits
Reasonable price for all the videos and pictures
Cons:
My first interest in the nude female was boobs. I still like big boobs, but I don’t think I’m as impressed with boobs in porn
I’m not trying to make a stand or debate, but I do believe the silicone boobs take away from the theme of big boobs
Bottom Line:
In the early days of the internet, I can remember checking out Scoreland and thinking I would join it one day. Big boobs were my main interest in the female body when I was eh – 18. To this day, boobs will turn my head as fast as any part of the female body, but I believe big boobs translate more in still photography than in videos. Either that or maybe I just like looking at the big boobs?
It may seem like I am going towards a negative review, but I am not. The opening paragraph explains some of my personal views and interests. As a porn big boob site, Scoreland is one of the best. The videos are not only filled with maximum boobage, but the resolution on all videos is at least high definition. There are also 4K video downloads on some of the videos. You will see upscaled 4K remasters as well.
But as I opined earlier, I believe big boobs are done more justice in pictures than videos. Scoreland’s picture sets are some of the best I have viewed and they have multiple resolutions you can download the picture sets in. There are no download limits. And despite all models having large boobs, the range of models is quite diverse. You will see some heavier models, some caucasian, some Hispanic, some African, then there will be slimmer models with large boobs, but this diversity, for my money, is hurt with the inclusion of implants. I do understand some implants are needed. But most of these models with implants are just investing in their careers as big boob models not for medical reasons.
The models are generally attractive and if you prefer older hairstyles and make-up, a lot of these models go for more of a 90s, early 2000s look. Unlike most sites that have models with one similar trait, like big boobs, the age range is as diverse as the races of the models.
I probably veer away from the average Score fan when I say I do spend more time looking at and downloading the pictures than the videos. The videos are good, but the big boobs, at least in my experience, become too much of the focus of the videos. The pictures show the whole body and how the boobs fit into the overall aesthetic.
The site is reasonably priced for the size of it. Looking through the pictures reminds me of the old magazines that focused on boobs and I do believe that is the strongest part of the site. I do believe the site is a must-join for big boob fans and even more so if you like seeing big boobs in video action.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
