Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Niche - Hardcore The category portal for a specific niche.

Hardcore Sex Reviews & Comments

Top Sites

Top rated and most active sites in the niche.

Top Rated

No Sites Found.
Most Active

No Sites Found.

New Reviews

Latest 3 user reviews in this niche.

Visit Only Tarts

1. Only Tarts (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
avgazn86 (0) 07-25-26  07:39am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: New releases (3/week), sales are frequent and generally coincide with the holidays, features high quality videos (4K or higher), Reasonable photosets, downloads available with subscription, settings are moderately customizable
Cons: Small library, access to only the site and not all company sites, lack of varied quality of life settings for video playback, no dedicated page for member cancellation (keep your “welcome” email for that handy)
Bottom Line: Only Tarts is primarily a Euro based site that features some of the newest and fastest rising stars in the industry. Only having, at the time of this review, a small library of scenes totaling ~500 scenes, what stands out most is the quality of scenes.

Navigation on the site is simplistic, without much in the way to distract you from finding or scanning through scenes. Pages are not cluttered with banners or sidebars, while it may be convenient if done right, the simple structure of the site is helpful with the navigatory accessories to distract or take up space on the page. Just a simple navigation bar across the top of the page is what you get. Once you select a scene, you will find the usual accessories of “like” and “favorite,” description, tags, related videos, and the hit or miss feature for some sites of a comments section. The video downloads and access to photos are simplified and easy to navigate. Models on the page are only of the female performer and not of the male, so sorry to those that want that.

The site does feature as one of the navigation tools of “Best Scenes” which is a nice touch. Only to go further in the videos page to be able to select and filter out the “Best Scenes of…” by year, all time, etc. Whatever timeframe you want to search. Being that the site launched in 2023, there isn’t much long-term use of this feature, but once the site accumulates more years, I see where this would be a useful feature. For now, it is just a nice quality of life feature. There are some, but not many 5K or 7K videos, but what I could tell is that all videos play at 60 fps and are all in 4K at the very least (lower qualities available, of course). The photo galleries are of decent quality (3000x2000) and generally are ample enough.

One unique item worth mentioning is in the individual video pages. Typically, with most sites, when you switch tabs or pages that are associated with the scene, the player window resets, thus making you start over or trying to find where you left off. I know, why would you do that, but sometimes you want to navigate around. Some sites will have a way for the video to keep playing in the background which also could lead to missing out on unique points in the scene. Not Only Tarts. When you interact with the scene’s contents, the video pauses ensuring that you can pick up where you left off when you were exploring.

The models are the site's biggest strengths. Primarily European/Foreign starlets but the “older” scenes do present some American ones. Solo content for some of the models are available and are marked as “...for OnlyTarts” in the scene title and tagged with a “Bonus” indicator. This is also the same for content that is tagged as lesbian.

Overall, Only Tarts is an impressive site with great production quality, attractive European/Foreign models, and a respectable library worth checking out especially when there are deals available. The critics are small and nitpicky, but not dealbreaking, thus making a recommendation for the site a simple one for anyone interested in this content.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Exploited College Girls

2. Exploited College Girls (0)

Pay
Newbie
95*
LadyLover (0) 07-15-26  12:41pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1183 Videos, 856 girls

Weekly updates, usually on Thursdays

Videos range from 1 hour in length to sometimes over 2 hours. 90 minutes is about average

Some of the 18 year olds are still in high school when posing

No stupid story. The girls are here to get paid for having sex on camera. The action is all real. And we are here to enjoy that.

All newer videos are available in 4K, 1080, 720 and 480 for downloading. The streaming is done at 720.

Includes access to Backroom Casting Couch and BBC Surprise
Cons: Very few thunderous orgasms, although plenty of regular orgasms

Almost every scene ends with a facial. Cream pies are rare.
Bottom Line: This is a sister site to Backroom Casting Couch, BBC Surprise, ExCogiGirls and Hot MILFS Fuck, although only the first two are included in this membership. This site started up in 2006 and has had weekly updates since that time, usually on a Thursday.

This review will focus on Exploited College Girls, not BCC or BBC Surprise. As KatyBuffs mentioned in her review, the site is now going by ExCogGirls, and is de-emphasizing the “Exploited” part. Even from the beginning, the Exploited part probably referred mostly to “college girls need money” than “we’re going to make her do stuff she doesn’t want to do.”

Most scenes have 1 boy and 1 girl performing. There are also some Boy-Girl-Girl and Boy-Boy-Girl. Most of the time there is a single studio guy doing the boy duties. For the past 3 or 4 years that dude has been Tyler Nixon. The two previous studio cocks were Jake Adams and Tim Cannon, both of whom passed away suddenly. The site creator, Steve, served this function for the first several years.

The formula starts with an interview with the girl. This usually lasts 5 to 10 minutes, and is almost always clothed. Of course there’s no need to be truthful when answering the questions, but I get the feeling that all of them really are. Especially for any girl that is first sex on camera or shy, there is a lot of giggling during the interview.

Then they get naked, with plenty of giggling to accompany the jiggling. This part usually takes only a minute or two before the girl is totally nude.

There follows the main event, and the sex is quite hot. Each scene since about 2023 has a helpful orgasm count with time stamps in the description, and there is even a count displayed in the video as each one happens. As I noted in the Cons, few of these are thunderous orgasms – some you might hardly notice. They are both self-reported by the girls after the fact, or sometimes reported by one of the members. But since they are not of the Meg Ryan at lunch variety, there is probably less acting going on and more actual releasing.

Finally comes the After Glow and a Shower. With lots of after-action reporting and the girls reliving the best parts of the scene. There is also a zipped photo set with each video.

The tag system is really good. If you go to the advanced filters, all of the tags are displayed so you can easily select one (and also see what options there are). Out of the 1183 videos, here are the counts for some of the tags:
First Anal Ever – 58; First Orgasm – 15; First Sex Toys – 91; Shy – 191; Fisting – 5; High School – 68; Tall – 26; Crying/Tears - 40

They reserve the right to throttle downloading, but I never ran into any restriction, and they don’t specify any. If you sign up via Porn Users, A 2-day trial goes for $1.00. One month is $19.99, rebilling at $19.99. 3 months non-recurring is $75, and one year recurring is $149.99 via PU. ccBill is the payment processor. The addition of two bonus sites makes the value here quite good.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Oldje

3. Oldje (0)

Pay
Newbie
94*
BatorAly (0) 07-07-26  06:00pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A site that I rated very highly 4-5 years ago and I can say, it's still very good

You can download the videos and pictures sets

It still updates

No limit on downloads and there are 4K downloads on newer videos

Navigation works well

Female models, especially the most recent ones are very cute
Cons: I cannot help but wonder how many of these videos are really a birthday gift for the men

No stories playing out in the scenes
Bottom Line: My sense of humor does not always translate well into English, but some of these scenes just leave me wondering how the men can maintain and perform with the vigor they have.

One of the newer scenes features a little Filipino model named Sofia and there was no way I was going to believe any older man could handle her energy but the man did

One con I did not list this time but believe I did before, I wish they would include access to oldje threesome. The last time I was on Oldje threesome I was even more blown away by the scenes since I thought it would be two older guys with one younger woman but it was one older.guy with two younger women.

That is a major selling point for me. I do not think I have ever watched a hardcore scene on regular hardcore sites and wondered how the man performed for a full scene, but I do that when watching Oldje scenes.

The download quality is 1080p HD up to 4K on some. Camerawork is good and does a good job of following the action. The picture sets are good for getting to know what the female looks like before she gets naked and has an old man all over her.

Oldje does risk becoming less impressive with no bonus content and eventually, you have to think some of these men are going to have to go to a retirement home or quit having the sexual drive they have. I have heard the jokes about porn always has new female models turning legal age, but will old men keep stepping up.

I do enjoy the scenes. The scenes are best when the female is not only surprised but looks genuinely impressed seeing the old men get hard for them. I believe that alone makes younger/older porn more enjoyable. There has to be something turning the woman on besides just the money. And I believe that is one of the biggest hurdles all porn faces.

I was concerned the site was not updating, but it is just because the site is starting to look outdated but there are updates. There are newer older men, that does not sound right, but you understand. Of all the newer scenes I have watched, all of the men are men I have not seen before. Maybe there is a fountain of youth tied to young, pretty, naked women?

Enjoyable porn makes me question scenarios like why do older women who are married to older men not invite a cute, younger woman over to give the older man some eye candy she can capitalize on later?

I am reducing the score some from the last time I reviewed it but it is still my favorite of the older/younger niche.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

View All:  New Reviews

New Comments

Latest 3 user comments in this niche.

Visit The POV God

1. The POV God (0)

Pay
Wraith0711 (0) 07-10-26  02:31pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Stopped updating

Site stopped updating Dec 25'

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brazzers

2. Brazzers (0)

Network
benmar51 (0) 05-11-26  11:16am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Some BAD news

Started a 30-day. . . paid for D/L's. . . D/L'ed 3 scenes at 720, about 1 GB each. . tried a 4th and was told I had reached my limit for the day. The same thing happened on Day 2. . . Sent an inquiring Email. . . No response yet. I can understand these sites setting a REASONABLE limit, but this is BEYOND unfair.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brazzers

3. Brazzers (0)

Network
snickelb (0) 03-16-26  02:22pm
Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Lots of actress entries seem to have disappeared

Lately a lot of the actress names I click on have no entries and give a 404 page. They have a text link below the video but no picture in the model section.

I also notice that there used to be close to a 1000 pages of models (yes, I bought too many of those lifetime deals), and page 179 used to be actresses with names starting with C. Now there aren't even 179 pages and the C's are page 27.

Anyone else noticed this? Could be a database error, or maybe they lost some big studios. My list of sites seems the same, as does the list of sites I haven't subscribed to, so I'm leaning to a screw-up on their end.

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


View All:  New Comments


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Related Niches
1. Anal (0)
2. Cum Shots (0)
3. Extreme (0)
4. Gangbangs (0)
5. Group Sex (0)

View All : Niches


Hardcore @ TBP
1. AdultTime 97.0
2. Perfect Gonzo 93.0
3. Vixen.com 92.5
4. Bang.com 92.5
5. Private.com 91.0
6. Evil Angel 90.0
7. Fap House 89.0
8. Babes Network... 89.0
9. Elegant Raw 88.0
10. Porn Plus 88.0
11. Love Her Film... 87.0
12. 21 Naturals 87.0
13. 5K Porn 86.0
14. Killergram 86.0
15. POV Masters 85.5

View All : Hardcore Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2026 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 4.53 seconds.