| User Reviews (15) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It is a staggeringly beautiful site
Classy but also knows when to be sensual
The models are all attractive
Excellent variety of models which is unusual in the glamour genre
Videos and photo zips are downloadable
It is still updating to an already gigantic collection |
| Cons: |
The constant scrolling feature can be annoying
While not as softcore as many glamour sites, it still is softcore compared to popular sites these days |
| Bottom Line: |
I was having a conversation with another porn fan and made a comment I thought could be taken as me being negative about Watch4Beauty. I said it is so good, it often leaves me wanting more. That is easily misconstrued and is more ambiguous than I usually am when discussing porn.
I understand my comment could make the clearly glamour site be stereotyped. Sites like Watch4Beauty were known for having gorgeous models posing in not so provocative poses. But that was not what my comment was about. Quite the contrary even. The models on Watch4Beauty have no problem showing you every inch of their feminine bodies. They will even give you close-up views and spread open angles. Once into the videos, they will even show you how those orifices work.
While the more risque content has not always been common on Watch4Beauty, it has been the norm for at least 10 years. There was a time when the content was even softer than it is now, but like other glamour sites, Watch4Beauty started showing more and using more. This created a dilemma. Showing pink was usually teased on glamour sites. Once it became common, there was a need for more.
Sites like Watch4Beauty including Met Art, Hegre and dozens of others nearly all started showing pink around the same time or roughly. I feel confident saying Watch4Beauty did more with showing pink than other glamour sites. I have even wondered how much the settings affected the comfortableness of the models. The models look to be on a vacation or holiday in their videos and pictures for Watch4Beauty. There is a more natural advancement from their models than from other glamour sites. These young models looked to step naturally from showing their body, but not their pink – stepped smoothly to not just showing their pink, but also showing how they use it and play with it and enjoy it.
There is a fine line in porn and I think all can agree with that. There is that moment that we – the viewer – may sigh a little and think the model is now just doing it for the money. I do not feel that way ever on Watch4Beauty. These models give off the feeling they love showing their bodies so much, it arouses them and they must touch themselves and show the viewer what they are touching.
The masturbation is believable and not drawn out for video length sake. It is very believable that these models have an orgasm or two or even three before they stop. That separates Watch4Beauty for me from the other glamour sites.
The site does feature the mobile friendly, forever scrolling feature and that feature is great if you are viewing the site on a cellphone or tablet, but it makes the site somewhat annoying to deal with on a desktop computer or laptop. It is a very minor annoyance for me. Maybe it helps that I find every single model to be very attractive? The videos are in great quality as are the photos. I like the photos from Watch4Beauty as much as any other site. The only other con for some could be that the content is 2024 softcore. Which is much different than 2005 softcore, but if you’re used to hardcore right from the start of a scene, this content will be a little softer than what you are used to.
Personally, I love the site, the models, the download options and yes, the settings. Most of these models do not look like what I picture when I think of a porn model. That too is a major plus.
My review does leave the question of what it is Watch4Beauty leaves me wanting more of? I am still waiting on a couple of the models to show up under my Christmas tree! It’s a site that does nearly everything right and the models are sexy enough, you may find yourself penning your first letter to Santa to ask for a couple of their models for yourself. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. This is becoming rare in today's porn world, where many sites either limit downloads, or make you pay extra for downloads, or eliminate downloads from some memberships.
-The site features many of the most beautiful women in the world. At one time (back before the internet), this would have been a massive selling point. But with sites like Metart (and it's sister sites), MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., sites with beautiful women are a commodity. It doesn't take away from the beauty and quality of the models, but it's human nature to devalue what is so freely available.
-However, the quality of the photography is excellent, and easily compares to the best that sites like Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy offer. The attractive models (I downplay the models, because many of these models are equisite and breathtaking and filmed with care) are a delight to look at.
-Site updates 3-4x per week.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Payment is easy: You can pay with a credit card (Visa or Mastercard), PayPal, or Crypto. I'm old-fashioned, but if you pay with Crypto, I've read that if you're a US citizen, you will have to include on your income tax report your short-term and long-term cryptocurrency gains and losses on Form 8949. Not reporting all crypto gains and losses is considered tax fraud.
So I'm glad I haven't had this problem yet.
-The mix of women is broader than traditional sites like Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy. You get your normal selection of white models, but you also get a strong element of Black, Indigenous, and people of color. This will be a plus for PU members who are craving something beyond the white models normally seen.
-I don't think of this as a mega-site like Metart or MPL Studios, but there is a large amount of photo sets and videos packed into the site. The layout is easy to navigate. The quality of the images is top-notch. You have hundreds of glamorous girls for your |
| Bottom Line: |
PROS(CONTINUED):viewing pleasure. Hundreds of lovely girls in thousands of photosets, hundreds of videos of these stunning models, the videos are mainly solo shoots, with the girls moving around and exposing their lovely bodies, having some sexual fun with other female models or masturbating by themselves.
-Listed price is $29.95/month. But PU offers a discount of $14.95 for the first month. Or if you look around, you can probably find a $9.95/month discounted special.
Hundreds of lovely girls in thousands of photosets, hundreds of videos of these stunning models, the videos are mainly solo shoots, with the girls moving around and exposing their lovely bodies, having some sexual fun with other female models or masturbating by themselves.
CONS(START 0F):
-I think the cons are basically minor for the site.
-Personally, I'm not a big fan of tattoos on women. But it's becoming more and more common over the years. And many of the Watch4Beauty models are into tattoos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Normal for almost all porn sites.
-My biggest con is that I wish there was more content of most of my favorite models at the site. Some models do one or two shoots, and then move on to other web sites.
-Years ago there used to be a few bonus sites, but they dropped them. However, the site contents is well worth the money to join, if you are into lovely young women stripping and showing off their bodies for your viewing pleasure.
-I'm more familiar with the download system used at Metart, Femjoy, etc, where you can easily select the video of your choice and the file defintion, or the photo set of your choice and the file definition, but the Watch$Beauty system, while not as refined, is still usable.
-Sometimes the file download speeds seem sluggish. I wish they were faster downloads.
BOTTOM LINE
The emphasis is on the photos. There are hundreds of videos that are definitely worth watching, but the true value, for me, is the photo sets.
I could stare for hours at Rinna's 2 photo sets. She's such a luscious model, young, vibrant, fresh, lovely, charming.
In summary, I believe I've listed the main reasons for joining this site. Gorgeous models representing a wide variety of ethnic types, top class photography, a mix of high-rent locations where the girls are having fun exploring their lucious bodies. They freshen up with the offerings with casting, peeing, masturbation, girlsinlove. So they put more thought and care into the shoots than most softcore photo sites.
I highly recommend the site. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (4 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (8 Replies)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (6 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (26) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
