Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Girls Out West

Visit Site

Girls Out West

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Amateur Girls
2. Lesbian Sex
3. Hardcore Sex

Boutique Media
1 Site Listed
Partner: None

Monthly: $29.50 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $47.50 (3 months, recurring)
Multi-Mo: $100.00 (8 months, non-recurring)
1 Year: $150.00 (non-recurring)

View all Girls Out West Site Facts at TBP.

N/A
Feedback History  (40)

Active Reviews 0
Newbie Reviews 27
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 1
Comments 12
Review by TheBestPorn:

90.0
TBP Review

Date: 03-24-22

Type: 2.0

Will
+  Enjoy Real Aussie Amateur Action
+  A Large Collection With Near-Daily Updates
-  Some Rotated Content & Lower Counts

User Reviews (26)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Shown : 1-10 of 26 Next Page >

Newbie
94*
HairyPotter (0) 05-13-25  08:58pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The most realistic porn site for me
The models are treated as women before than as models
Plenty of high resolution downloads and no limit that I know of
Picture sets are some of the best I have seen
Updates nearly daily
The models come in all different sizes, races, builds, hair colors
Cons: The navigation is good enough, but it does get frustrating at times
Because the models are different in so many ways, it could be a problem if you only prefer one or two types of models
Bottom Line: Girls Out West offers the most realistic porn for my money. I believe that could be a problem for some, but for me, it’s my favorite part. The women go from slim to medium to heavy, all hair colors, even the personalities of each model show. You might not like every model, but it will be hard to convince me you don’t like at least some of the models. The sex scenes, mostly lesbian, feature what I see as real sex. The moans sound real. The reactions are real. The women themselves seem real too. I believe when you’re filming mostly amateurs you have the advantage of the models not having to live up (or down to) an image. Just like there were known models who were very vocal and even loud. You don’t get that on Girls Out West. These models react how they would in real life.

The updates are very good. You will see an average of 5-6 new scenes per week. That is in addition to the nearly 6,000 videos the site already has. Girls Out West is the one site that makes me think amateur models are far better off with minimal scripts. I don’t know what all goes into that, but the women look to be having genuine fun, experiencing real passion and having orgasms.

The realism is really stronger in the non-sexual parts. You can see the chemistry the models have together before the clothes come off. They laugh, they pick on each other, you can even pick up the eye contact and the moment their minds shift to sex. There are other sites that offer a similar experience, but I believe Girls Out West has it figured out more than any site. I just don’t believe it is that easy to create passion the viewer can feel. Not every Girls Out West scene does that. I am going to guess and say at least half the scenes I have watched were strong on passion.

I do believe the different model types could be a slight problem for some people. We wouldn’t have genres focusing on specific body types if body types or even ethnicity wasn’t an important part. I will go as far as saying it’s often the most important part to a porn fan. The models on Girls Out West are very different – even scene to scene. But, because I value realism in my porn, I accept not every model is going to match my preferences.

There’s nothing really wrong with the navigation. I find problems when searching in the older scenes, but I can’t offer a suggestion on how to make it better. I believe it’s because the site has been around for over 25 years.

When I said, in the pros, women are treated as women before they are treated as models, that just means, the women are treated as real and with emotions. It’s my belief a model is directly related to an actress. No one, at least I hope not, gets up everyday and turns into a model everyday. There has to be a certain level of acting for a human to see themselves or present themselves as a model. I never thought mindfulness would be an important part of porn, but it sure makes it more enjoyable.

You can download the videos and photo sets. The videos look great on my monitor and the picture sets are as good as the videos. I have found myself surprised by some of the scenes I ended up liking. I attribute the surprise to me thinking I would only like videos with a model with a specific build or ethnicity. It is the strength of the site. The models are happy and are enjoying themselves. I do believe that is something lost in most porn. I would rather see a model who doesn’t match my preferences, but is enjoying herself than a model who matches my preferences, but seems miserable. It is one of those sites I believe deserves a round of applause.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Expired
90*
ClosetPeeper (0) 01-10-23  11:52am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
96*
Alybator (0) 03-20-22  10:42pm
Rookie Badge  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
90*
UMBA8 (0) 08-05-20  02:43am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
94*
KayTBuffs (0) 04-29-20  01:16am
Rookie Badge  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
89*
Simon66 (0) 05-25-19  11:58am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
97*
exotics4me (0) 01-06-19  02:26am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
92*
elephant (0) 08-23-16  05:24am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
90*
Broncoviz (0) 09-15-15  10:39am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (2 Replies)

Expired
60*
RagingBuddhist (Disabled) 06-01-13  12:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-10 of 26 Next Page >
User Comments (12)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

Shown : 11-12 of 12 < Previous Page

messmer (Disabled) 04-28-09  09:07am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

And A Year Later!

This is my third time with this site and disillusionment is starting to creep in. Only five days into the new subscription and I am all caught up because updates have been minimal.

There are normally two listed for every day (one picture set, one video), problem is that the video update is simply another segment and not the whole. Sometimes it is even a re-mastered segment of an old video.

Having been a member of many other sites in the meantime it is really starting to annoy me that a complete video still isn't available with one click. If they want to drag out their updates that way, fine, but why couldn't old videos be combined and available as a whole.

Many of the new models, too, (and there aren't that many) are not as appealing as those of the past. THAT might be a matter of personal taste but this site, in my eyes, has gone from WOW to ho-hum. Too bad because it was my favorite. I attempted to change the score on my previous review but it is past its editing date and I don't feel much like writing a new one, so consider my previous score lowered by ten points.

Still quite respectable, still recommended to Amateur lovers who haven't visited the site before but I have tired of it and it will be my last visit.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

messmer (Disabled) 01-15-08  12:02pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)

Excellent Site!

A comment rather than a review because, looking back at my previous efforts, I find that in my initial rush of excitement at having found something unusual I tend to give sites a higher rating than they deserve .. in my subjective opinion, of course.

My first impression of GOW is WOW: Abby Winters with spice! I couldn't find glamor and I love that! The models are of the next door, amateur variety and if some aren't as pretty as many might prefer they are fine with me because of their very ordinariness.

When it comes to posing there's no coyness on the part of the model nor attempt by the photographer to create "artistic" nudes. The poses and talk are often raunchy. It is an anti-pornography site (according to Annie, the webmaster/mistress) because it shuns the artificial glamor (glistening, tanned bodies, fake overblown breasts etc.) of most porn sites. I know that when it comes to a preference to see natural girls presented in a natural setting I'm with her all the way and wish her lots of success. I know it is the first time that I am actually tempted to commit myself long term to any site. The next week or two will tell!

BTW, one extra bonus for me: the picture sets are huge and for once many pics have been taken in a "landscape" format which I prefer. This allows me to weed out the "portraits" and still end up with a continuous set taking the model from fully clothed to completely naked. But, as stated, that's MY bonus, you may not care.

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Shown : 11-12 of 12 < Previous Page

Visit Girls Out West

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Girls Out West (0) N/A 90.0

View All: Company Sites (1)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.