| User Reviews (17) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Layout is almost a clone of MetArt, which has very good layout
Excellent photo and video quality
Good download and browsing speeds
Beautiful girls
Support of the MetArt Network
An excellent softcore site with an extensive archive |
| Cons: |
Down to only 2 updates per week
No new videos since 2018
Limited Model Information. Just measurements and home country
No sexual activity of any kind. The emphasis is on beauty.
No real differentiation from the sister sites at Domai, Erotic Beauty or Goddess Nudes |
| Bottom Line: |
Errotica Archives is another site in the Met Art network. Originally it was a site for the single photographer Erro, who also posted frequently at Met Art, but it is now a multi-photographer site. Erro last posted to this site in 2021.
I last reviewed the site in 2017, and back then it was doing daily updates. That has changed to now only do 2 updates per week, on Wednesday and Friday.
What I always considered one of the biggest strengths of this site was the long term relationship some of the models had with the site. That was true during the time this was exclusively a site run by Erro, but that is no longer the case.
Really, it’s hard to tell this site apart from its sister sites of Domai, Goddess Nudes, or Erotic Beauty. All four of these sites are now multi-photographer, and all four post updates twice a week. They also frequently share postings from the same photo shoot. For example, Errotica Archives might post, say 40-60 of the photos from a shoot. Then a month or two later (or sometimes years later) Erotic Beauty might post a different 40-60 of the photos from the same shoot. So strictly speaking, there is no overlap – none of the exact photos in the first release appear in the second release. The poses are slightly different from one set to the next, but they were obviously all taken at the same shoot.
Almost all of the photo sets and videos involve solo girls, and the ones that have two or more are just nude girls near one another. No sexual activity is going on.
The girls are very beautiful, rarely shy, and photographed with great technical skill. The site performs well.
When I reviewed this in 2017, the model count was 319. As of today it is up to 1057. There are now 84 artists with stuff posted here, compared to the one when the site was first founded. 5023 Photo Galleries, still posting 2 updates per week. 644 videos, but the last new one was posted in 2018. The oldest stuff dates back to 2004.
The PU discount of $19.99 for a month is a good value. Annual memberships go for $99.99. As of today’s review, there is a sale on for $9.95 per month. These sales pop up pretty regularly during US holidays. If you miss this one, the next one will probably be at Thanksgiving.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it is pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it is not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
You should certainly find plenty of material here to occupy yourself for a full month if you take the plunge. And if any of your old favorites have an extensive representation here, you will think that you hit the jackpot. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (4 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
- Webmaster Replied!
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (8 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (2 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (8) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|
