Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Webmaster Profile A detailed history of activity from this webmaster in all different categories.

Webmaster : Jayz (0)

View Feedback:   Replies (5)         Other:   Site Feedback (769)   |   Replies Received (2) Incoming Feedback All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. Shown : 101-125 of 191 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Comment 101 MetArt (0) Special Offer?????? On checking my email this morning i found an email offer to join Met Art and get Nubiles for free. Having never been a member at either site before i was tempted at the thought of signing up to both for a year knowing that Met have a great $99 deal for 1 year memberships, however on clicking through to the sign up page for Ccbill i discover the join price is $199.99......how the fuck is this a special offer?? 04-10-11  02:57am Replies (4) Comment 102 MetArt (0) New design for Met-Art updates page. Met-art has re-designed the updates page. Met-art is constantly tinkering with the site design to improve the Met-art experience, to make the site easier to use. The old update page was basically a listing of the most recent updates (photosets and videos) with a nice-sized thumbnail of each cover sheet. By clicking on any thumbnail, you would get a full-sized page of that cover sheet. In the new update page design, you get a reduced number of update thumbnails. The updates are now sorted into a photoset grouping, and a video grouping. Before, the photosets and videos were lumped together, and sorted by date (most recent to oldest). By clicking on a thumbnail for the cover of a photoset, instead of getting a larger, full-page version, you now get 14 tiny thumbnails of photos within that set. New to the updates page is a section of thumbnails that shows the Live Met Cams models. Also new to the updates page is a listing, with thumbnails, of the top rated Metart models. Personally, I liked the old design better, it was simpler, and showed a larger amount of the most recent updates. But for someone who is just browsing, and is new to this site, the new design does a better job of showcasing the huge content that Metart offers with a membership. All of this information was available before, but the new design places more information on the primary updates page. And the technical expertise of the site design is impressive. The thumbnail links work easily. You click on a thumbnail of a model in the highest rated section, and it brings up a listing (thumbnails) of that model's photosets and videos. 02-10-11  12:25am Replies (4) Comment 103 MetArt (0) Roy Stuart sets Looking at the list of updates on the site, I might have to revise my opinion and add this site to my list, as I see a couple of sets shot by the legendary (well, in some circles) Roy Stuart... Actually, would be much obliged if somebody with a membership could let me know how many of his sets there are there? 01-10-11  02:22am Replies (2) Comment 104 MetArt (0) TBP Special Price Not Available The TBP price of $19.99 is not available if you use the TBP link to the site. The price is $29.99. Did the TBP deal expire when the year changed to 2011? Also, the 1 year price is $99.99, not $109.99 as shown by TBP. 01-01-11  07:04pm Replies (7) Comment 105 MetArt (0) Improved Functionality for Users Met Art gallery pages now allow you to: 1. Rate the series, the model, or the photographer separately 2. Input tags for each series 3. Return to recently viewed content (their starred "Recent" button) 4. Control viewing options such as number of thumbs per page, whether the thumb opens a pic in a new window, and the default resolution of opened pics. These are nice improvements, but I did notice one change. It used to be you could change the default photo viewing resolution right on a gallery page, but now it always uses the "browser options" setting whenever you go to a new page. So you might, for example, change the view to "low" but get "high" on the next page. Perhaps this seems like a quibble, but I did like being able to reset the default without having to go into the browser options area. Just the same, the overall improvements show that Met Art continues to find ways to enhance the user experience. UPDATE: They're going to fix the problem I pointed out here (see replies). 12-30-10  12:30am Replies (5) Comment 106 MetArt (0) Lots of Partner-Deals With Other Sites Met-art is now offering lots of different affiliate deals with various partner sites - not just from their individual e-mails, which has gone on for a while and caused a bit of controversy when I commented on one and linked to the offer - but on the site itself. I assume everyone sees the same offers as I do when they click on the site. Pretty cool offers - some that I've never seen made before - on sites such as Nubiles.net and RonHarris.com 12-18-10  06:35am Replies (1) Comment 107 MetArt (0) Captivating! There have been many site improvements lately. The design has been enhanced and ease of navigation has greatly increased. The models are as delicious as ever, and I actually think they're getting much more stimulating. I find new content more erotic and less artsy than in the past. The poses are more explicit, but the photography is world-class. High-res content now comes in resolutions up to 39 megapixels -- enough to make my 24" monitor seem tiny and let you see as much detail as your heart, or penis, desires. Some of the greatest improvements I've seen are in the erotic movies and live webcams. The erotic movies are, well, erotic. For the most part, the girls have gotten away from the cutesy posing and goofing off to fill video time and are much more sensual and seductive. And the hotties on live webcams are a real treat. They're not the two-dollar whores or sleazy sluts with dildos you usually find on live webcams, these babes are classy, seductive, and friendly, and they really know how to push my buttons. I would have joined for this alone. More than I entended to say, but I like to give credit where credit is due. 11-22-10  12:02pm Replies (7) Review 108 MetArt (0) 84.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: I'm not going to go into to technical aspects of the display contents because all that is clearly spelled out in the Best Porn page. I will say that the image quality on photo sets are as good as it gets. Sharp, crisp and retention friendly with even the highest zoom setting. The number of Models appear endless, that is if you're smart enought to negotiate the dated archives, something I've yet to accomplish. Models are listed under alphabetically labeled tabs, which I liked. The most sterling feature, and one sadly absent in many other major sites, is their Flash Player. This allows one to play the clip before downloading -- something I find essential.Plenty of picture sets with up to and over a hundred frames per set. The site's reported to have thousands of videos, unfortunately I wasn't able to find them. No DRM or restriction on downloads. No problems logging in -- as well as enjoying freedom from unexpected shortcomings after doing so. Cons: 1) Video content, although of excellent quality, as a rule provided poorly orchestrated scenes. 2) As mentioned, I couldn't access the number of videos reported...could've been my ignorance. 3) Picture Images and videos, although offering ample nudity substantially lacked eroticism. 3) Too many closeups dwelling too long on a single scene in the video clips. 4) Sizable watermarks on videos. 5) Archives going back to 2005 produced the same material as offered in 2010. That is to say the number of selections is kind'a limited. Bottom Line: I, personally, don't particually care for Met Art. Although Met Art and Erotica Archives came as a combo at $30, as I've said before that if I had it to go over I'd decline the offer. Both are beautiful sites, but in my mind Met Art is over-rated. It's fair to say, to the connoisseur, the exquisite photography alone might be worth the cost. But I'm not into precision photography. The site never delivered what I expected, although, again, it could've been something I wasn't doing; But then again, it shouldnt've been that complicated --even for me. 11-01-10  07:49pm Replies (4) Comment 109 MetArt (0) A new offer? I happened to notice my regular Met Art email and clicked it figuring it would be the usual Met Art + Met Models offer, instead, it was Met Art + Nubiles.net for $29.95. Anybody else get this offer? I haven't been on either site in awhile, so I may have to take this offer. 10-28-10  09:21pm Replies (16) Comment 110 MetArt (0) Met-art updates page is currently messed up. First time I've noticed the met-art updates page being really messed up. The thumbnails for the most recent updates are out of order, with wrong listing dates for when the photosets/videos were posted. I assume the mix-up will be fixed soon. The page I'm looking at is: http://www.met-art.com/new.html Edit01: For what it's worth, the met-art updates page has now been fixed. I didn't have to clear my browser cache to get the corrected page of updates, so the problem was definitely on the met-art site, and not from my PC. :) 07-20-10  11:12pm Replies (4) Comment 111 MetArt (0) No love for MET-cams? I've been a member on and off since MET was Most Erotic Teens and been steady for close to 4 years now. The thing that's kept me subscribed are the cam shows. There used to be fewer models and two-hour shows, and now there are many more models doing one-hour shows. As far as I'm concerned, the free cams are worth the subscription price alone. The shows are super-softcore (no genital touching) and conversation is strictly monitored, so if you like your porn polite, this is a plus. The shows (like the photo sets, come to think of it) are a bit uneven, but there are ratings in place to guide you. Less popular models don't get booked as often, or at all after a while. Some models have been with MET for years and they never disappoint. Others are students and look it, and they also act like it. Some have photo sets, although they don't always get the best photographers, since they are often not professional models and often live in out of the way locations. English is not the first language of any of the current models, who speak either Russian, Romanian or Tagalog so chat can be hit or miss in the public shows. If you decide to spring for a one-on-one chat, they use Google translation, which goes a long way. Keep in mind that the private shows are meant to be as softcore and polite as the public ones, although chat is *not* monitored. You can also do two-way voice chat in private shows. The time I've spent there has saved me a ton of money I might have spent elsewhere, and I have some fond memories of a few sweet, beautiful models who have gone on to other things. How many places do you get to look up the butt of a hot model who remembers your nick? For.Free. Even though there are more models each doing fewer public shows each now, it's still the kind of personal experience I've not come across anywhere else. Anyway, I just thought I'd give a shoutout to the very lovely and friendly cams models at MET, since they are a really nice bonus on top of the pictures and vids. NB: The cams are being upgraded as we speak and will *supposedly* become available again as of June 11. We'll see. 06-06-10  07:01pm Replies (3) Comment 112 MetArt (0) Impressions. I am not going to post a review on this, because I have nothing really to add about the statistics etc that hasn't already been covered in great detail. I appreciate this purports to be an artsy site, and I can take that at face value. What really disappoints me about this site is the lack of variety & creativity. It is all very formulaic & repetetive. Sure beautiful girls, scantily clad to nude, usually outside. Most of the thumbnail set 'covers' blend into each other. There is so much material, I am bound to have missed a few gems in there, but searching through the 'covers' to find one that stands out gets dull. A shame, but that is the way it strikes me. Cap'n. :0/ 05-04-10  10:14am Replies (5) Comment 113 MetArt (0) Met-art videos getting more creative? Most of the past Met-art videos were boring. Very pretty girls for subjects, but videos were boring and a waste of time to watch. This last video I saw, "FIRST MOVIE" BY RYLSKY, with the model Guerlain A., release date 04.25.2010, was slightly more interesting. The model is pretty, which is nothing new for Met-art, but I kept expecting the model to turn into a monster or creature, or for someone to jump on her and start slashing away with a knife or axe or something. Partly it was the lighting and the slow way the camera focused on the model, partly the music. Still a boring video, but maybe in part 2 they will add the monster/creature/slasher part for greater excitement. 05-03-10  03:44pm Replies (2) Review 114 MetArt (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Stunningly gorgeous models, photographed in the most tasteful settings. Cons: This isn't soft porn -- it's flaccid porn. No heat at all. Cover thumbnails are small and difficult to see. Many sets don't seem to have working slideshows. Bottom Line: After years of depriving myself of a MET-ART membership, I finally succumbed. What a disappointment. Maybe I'm just jaded, but MET-ART could be the perfect antidote to porn addiction. In the end, it's just one beautiful naked, hairless girl after another. Absolutely no heat, no spontaneity, no nothing. Vogue without the clothes. If that's your thing, go for it. 04-29-10  11:10am Replies (4) Review 115 MetArt (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Almost a million photos here - and available in top q + Maybe the site with the best variation in nude models + Quite a lot of models not seen anywhere else - or very rarely + Updates - they're up to 4 each day (photosets, mainly) + Good price at TBP + Good feedback/help from webmaster/webmasters + 3 different resolutions for photosets + All resolutions have zip for download + Ok navigation considering the vast amout of sets/models + Quite a lot of new models updating - and different photographers + Photosets are still getting more erotic/sensual and less artistic Cons: - Videos are still not great, alas - some even just boring. This is a PHOTOSITE - if you have not been here before: do not forget that. - Even if the navigation is ok, the browsing at model-pages is a bit clumsy - you get a lot of mouse-work here. - Too many outdoor shoots for my taste - Boring and not very erotic g/g sets - Can be a bit repetitive in the long run Bottom Line: Been at this rather special and somewhat great site many times over the years - but never stay more than that one month. The reason is: After spending hours and days searching for those models that - for you - hit the fan - things seems to fade out. Oh, even if you get those four updates each day - everything seems to get more and more repetitive. BUT still: This is the place for collectors of fine nude photosets - AND the quality is getting better and better. Those 5616x3744 high resolution sets are some of the best quality I've seen anywhere - if your're really hooked on those nude top-photosets, this is it. The best thing about this photodeal here is, that MetArt are getting more and more new photographers - and even if some of the sets can be that repetitive, the variation is better now that the last time I was here some 9 months ago. Even if the search might be teasing now and then - even for the experienced PU - there's help: I like the way all (or most) sets have the choice of biography/full cover view/low/mid/high res AND inside the scene you get the choice of this models other sets - a fine plus. The videos are the same old problem: not very erotic, not very sexy - maybe even boring. Very Strange - since also MetArt are going for more videos now. The quality was BAD in the start - it's getting better - but still: forget about the clips here - and even for this video-freak I join only because of the photos. AND, btw: Some newer videos (Evelyn P - 2010/04/13) are - again - in low quality - WHY? For outside US PUs you'll get a higher price when trying to join the TBP $ 19.95-deal. But if you write the webmaster, you'll get a link to that special price - I did - and it took about 12 hours to get the link - MetArt cares about their customers - it seems. Even if I also this time only stay on for a month (and save maybe 20-25 sets, only), I'll certainly be back later this year... And a final bottom line: Compared to a lot of shitty sites out there: you can always rely on MetArt - no con here. 04-14-10  05:44am Replies (3) Comment 116 MetArt (0) Sophie Moone back from retirement. Met-art has a photoset that posts tomorrow of a new model named Sophie D. She is better known as Sophie Moone. Back from retirement, she is still a great-looking woman. 04-02-10  01:13am Replies (3) Comment 117 MetArt (0) Help with regional pricing - great! A hint to other Europeans: The $ 19.95 here at TBP is a sweet deal - BUT again - no matter if it's CCBill or Epoch the price for Europeans is much higher. So I mailed the site and one Damon from MetArt came back in less than 12 hours with a link, so that this European could join for those $ 19.95....Thanks! (would like to place the link here, but it's only valid for Denmark, as I see it) - so mail the site! BTW: Getting back again to photos and softcore/nude - and this site sure got it - still. Probably be back with a new review - it's a looooong time ago, since I've been here. 03-29-10  05:54am Replies (5) Comment 118 MetArt (0) Great site, but... This site is clearly above all others at what it does - at least in my opinion - gorgeous natural women with fantastic photography. Just wondering, however, does anyone else think maybe they are taking the picture resolution too far? I mean 3000x4400 seems a tad excessive. A zip file of one of the photo sets I downloaded in high was over 500 MB. This seams especially odd considering their "mid resolution" sets are usually better quality than the vast majority of other sites. 03-02-10  05:15pm Replies (1) Review 119 MetArt (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: Enormous content. High-resolution JPEG files. Files have unique file names. Navigation is simple and effective. Cons: HUGELY over-rated by TBP. WAAAY too "arty-farty." Do you REALLY need half a million pictures of skinny, flat-chested girls standing on the beach, or in some other outdoor location? Files named by photographer, not by model. Bottom Line: I'm just days away from ending a year-long subscription. As others have said, there is a huge amount of non-erotic content. Really, truly, there is probably something in the neighborhood of half a million pictures of "naked girls standing on the beach" -- just hundreds, if not thousands, of sets with nothing more close-up or erotic than a girl just standing there. Then there are "prop shots" -- if you see a girl standing there holding a bunch of flowers or an orange ball or whatever, you can rest assured that EVERY SINGLE PICTURE in the set will prominently feature that prop. And so on. This is "arty-farty" nonsense. And there are TERABYTES of it. Yes, there is plenty of "good stuff," too. Terabytes of it, too. Your job -- and it will be a substantial amount of "work" -- will be to sort through it all. The bottom line for me was that I could skip over half or more of the sets, and still walk away with thousands of sets of really good-quality photos. It was just disconcerting, at first, to go through set after set after set of non-erotic "girls standing on the beach" stuff, before I finally found something worth keeping. Naming sets by the photographer is nonsensical, except that you could use them to sort out the arty-farty photographers from the ones who actually comprehend why people like us pay money to subscribe to sites like these. Finally, the sheer volume of stuff is just astonishing. It's very easy to fill up a 1-terabyte drive. And it must constitute something beyond a million images, just speaking about the pictures. Choose what you download with care! 01-03-10  08:14pm Replies (5) Comment 120 MetArt (0) Worth 90 in the 1990s MA is the most overvalued page on TBP ever! A shitload of naked girls might be a reason to join but they should start to rebuild their technical concepts and design. The browsing experience is equally boring as the sets they offer! 12-08-09  03:17pm Replies (4) Comment 121 MetArt (0) Better price for europeans Well, here we go - if your're in Europe, you have to pay more via CCBill - when you try to join from TBP. But here are the price in dollars for europeans - and SAVE money - mailed to this user by the Met Art-folks: https://bill.ccbill.com/jpost/signup.cgi...me=3cc&language= English&allowedTypes=139,419,150,295&subscriptionTypeId=136¤cyCode=840 Sorry, I cannot get the entire link marked up/with underlining, but try it anyway (I'm messing with a new pc and a rather unknown Windows Vista) 11-23-09  06:06am Replies (0) Comment 122 MetArt (0) Currency help Met Art got an ok deal at the moment where you can join the Mother-load ( main-site) and the Errotica Archives for a better price: $ 29.95. But the deal - AND generally the joining-procedure for Met Art comes up different, if you try to join from anywhere in Europe - THEN the price is EURO 29.95 - which is somewhere around 40 Dollars. But: Write the webmaster and get another link direct to 'the dollar-deal' and save some money. I did - and it took about four hours to get a link to 'the right price' Can I place that link here, webmasters of TBP/PU?????? 11-21-09  03:31pm Replies (0) Rating 123 MetArt (0) 96.0 No Review. 09-16-09  12:48am Comment 124 MetArt (0) Best in nude art niche I think Met Art is one of the best site in Nude Art niche. I like models very much. 09-14-09  11:36pm Replies (0) Comment 125 MetArt (0) Vastly Over-Rated Site Of all the sites I have joined over the years this is the most over-rated. Not one ounce of sensuous or sexual feeling in anything. The movies are a total joke. My idea of a good movie is NOT to have the stage hands walking back and forth in the scene. In videos with two girls the girls are usually laughing so hard they can barely stand. What's sexy about that? 07-26-09  10:59am Replies (4) Shown : 101-125 of 191 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.07 seconds.