Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : LKLK (0)

Feedback:   All (518)  |   Reviews (162)  |   Comments (40)  |   Replies (316) Other:   Replies Received (290)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 201-225 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 201 Teen Mega World (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -There are secure and non-secure versions of the TMW (Teen Mega World) network. Use the secure version, if you can find it. (https). -The network has over 30 sites, covering a wide variety of teen niches. -Membership in any one of the satellite sites gives you access to the entire network of sites. -The network has over 2,000 teen models, most of them attractive to very attractive. -Navigation has recently improved with the last network update. The search used to be network-wide only if you joined through the main TMW site, but now I believe the search is network-wide if you join any satellite site in the network. I am basing this on the following: I have a membership in Teen Sex Movs. I also have a membership in the main Teen Mega World site. The reason I have a membership in the TMW site is because until recently, the search at Teen Sex Movs (like the search at any of the satellite sites) was restricted to the site you joined through. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): So I requested a membership in the TMW site, because that search was network wide, and the customer service people at TMW were kind enough to give me a complimentary membership to TMW, because I was a paying member of Teen Sex Movs. The join-specific search function was a major barrier to finding and accessing the content of any model, since you were limited to results from your join site. So you could not find the contents of a model, except at your join site. You would not know what contents she had: and even if you employed work-around methods to learn she has content at other network sites, it would be a massive task accessing that content. The last, recent network update made the search for each site network-wide, instead of join-site specific, so finding and accessing the content of a model at the network is now made easy. CONS(START OF): -Many of the sites are archive sites that stopped updating years ago. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): For many years, the network introduced new sites, then stopped updating them within a year or two. This was to increase the number of sites they could advertise as being in the network, as well as trying new ideas for porn sites. -Some of the archive sites are not maintained well. You can't stream videos from some sites, but you can download the videos and play them on your PC. -The quality of the videos from the older archive sites can reflect the cheap, low-rent style of the network when it was just starting: the video definition can be 720p or lower, the sets are cheap, the over-all quality is just lower than the high quality videos and photosets that have been produced over the last several years. -Uses proprietary billers: Fxbilling, VENDO, Centrobill. I have used VENDO many times over the years (for TMW subs), and never had a problem. But CCBILL and Epoch are more familiar names, and easier to deal with. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -Teen Mega World (AKA TMW) is one of the best hardcore teen networks on the internet. That is a strong statement to make. There are several reasons for this: -There used to be a low membership price, of $90/year. But they raised the price to $119.40/year, and I've seen it priced as high as $149.88. So what used to be a low-priced network has become a medium- or high-priced network. I recommend waiting for a holiday special to get a discounted membership at $90/year or less. -The selection of teen models is good to excellent. The girls are real teens. And most of them are naturally attractive. Not much effort is put into making them beautiful, with make-up or glamorous costumes, but the girls are young and naturally attractive, and seem to really enjoy exploring their bodies for sex. -Over the years, the network has evolved from a low-rent collection of hardcore teen videos to putting time, money and effort into upgrading the videos and photosets. They have offered 4K videos at many of their sites for a few years. They even have a site dedicated to 4K videos. And a virtual reality site was added a few years ago. Overall, the quality of the videos and phtosets are good to excellent, with more expensive sets, upgraded lighting, high quality video camera equipment, better sound editing, etc. -They recently did a network upgrade which fixed a serious search problem. For the last couple of years, if you joined through one of the satellite sites, your search was limited to the site you joined through. Even when you switched to one of the other sites, your search was still limited to your join site. But the last upgrade made the search cover the entire network: now, when you enter a model's name, the search returns her content at the entire network, instead of only at your join site. And the search returns hot links to the models content, so, instead of having to log in to each individual site, you can access her entire content from a single search. -Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites requiring an extra payment. There are currently over 30 sites, covering a wide variety of teen niches. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -5,000+ videos. -2,000+ models. -PU has a discounted price to the network of $14.95/month (recurring), for people who want a shorter membership. The normal listed price is $29.95/month (recurring). -Recent update rate is 3 new videos every 4 days for the network. This is slower than before, but most porn sites are reacting to the financial downturn that started in 2008 and has caused many fine porn sites to close. 07-21-19  06:02pm Replies (0) Review 202 Teen Sex Mania (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -The main pro is the network did a recent update, where they made the search cover the entire network, instead of just the site you joined through. This made finding and accessing the content of each model much easier. -Teen Sex Mania is part of the Teen Mega World nework (TMW), one of my favorite hardcore teen networks. -Membership in any one of the satellite sites in the network gives you access to all the sites. There are no premium sites requiring extra payment. So you get access to 33 sites currently. -Site averages 1 new video per month. However, the network averages 3 new videos every 4 days. -Apparently, you can log in to any site in the network directly, with your login details, not just the site you joined through. However, since you can log in to your join site, and then transfer to any site in the network through the switching method, this is just an added convenience. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Sometimes you can find a secure version of the network (https), and sometimes you will find the non-secure version (http). They should delete the non-secure version, since that version is open for hacking. Note: It's been a while since I've seen the https version of the network. The only https version I've seen recently, is for the join page. So maybe they dropped the https version, which would be a mistake, because many porn sites are converting to a secure version instead of a non-secure version. CONS(START OF): -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -The network has 33 sites. Most of them are archive sites that do not update. There are about 10 sites that update on an irregular basis. -Vendo is the default biller. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, but I've been a member through Vendo many times, and never had a problem. Bottom Line: The site and network started out as a low-rent teen hardcore porn: the sets were cheap, the girls wore cheap street clothes, the videos were just a guy and girl fucking with no preliminaries except maybe 1 or 2 kisses. The video definitions ran from about 360 to 720p. Over time, as the network made money, they invested the money into upgrading the content: the sets became cleaner, with nicer furniture and better lighting, better camera-work, higher definition (1080p in 2014, 2160p in 2016). They also added a virtual reality site in 2016. But even at the start, they were smart enough, or lucky enough, to focus on the models they used: the girls were real teens, and ranged from nice-looking to attractive to very attractive. The models are not cheap sluts, but attractive teens who seem to really enjoy getting into sex: female masturbation, girl-girl, boy-girl, boy-girl-girl, 2 boys on one girl. That is one of the main strengths of the site and the network: how attractive the models are. Another main strength is how they really seem to enjoy getting fucked. Not much effort is put into making the models glamorous or good-looking: but since they are young and naturally attractive, it doesn't matter: these are mainly good looking teens: and some of them are even beautiful. The girls are natural: almost no implants. Out of over 2,000 models (I haven't examined every single one, but I've looked at most of them), I've only seen a few models with plastic/silicone boobs. The tip off is extra-large boobs that barely jiggle when the model moves. Many of the models either appear in glamor sites like MetArt or could easily appear there due based on their appearance, which is as good or better than the average-looking model a MetArt: A few examples would be: Adel Bye, Autilia, Benta, Candy Red, Clarice, Diana B, Evelina Darling, Grace C, Heather Dew, Katelyn, Karoll, Latoya, Lolly, Lolly Small, Sheri Vi, Tetti Dew Korti, Aza, Kortny, Svetlana C, Witta. The list could go on and on. What I mean is, there are so many cute and adorable girls at this site, and network, that the catalog of models compares, in my mind, to any glamor site, including MetArt and MPL Studios, who have some of the finest teen models in the world. The Teen Mega World models don't have the make-up and other attentions that try to make them glamourous: but they are so naturally attractive, that you can't help wishing you were the stunt cock pleasuring them. I'm giving the site and network a score of 92. This is because not only is the site a source of many fine videos, but you also get network access to over 5,000 hardcore teen videos. 07-25-19  02:20pm Replies (0) Review 203 Teen Sex Movs (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -The main pro is they did a recent network update that made using the site and network much easier. A few years ago, they did a network update that made searching and accessing the contents of a model a massive task: the search was limited to the site you joined through: even when you logged in to one of the other sites in the network, your search was still limited to your join site: so you would not be able to know or find the content of a model, except at your join site: also, even if you were able to use other search methods to learn the model had content at other sites in the network, accessing that content was a miserable, time-consuming task, because you would have to log in to that specific site, then page through the video listings to find her specific content at that site. The best solution, under the previous join-site-specific-search, was to join through the Teen Mega World site, where your search covered the entire network. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): But now, Teen Mega World (TMW), and the satellite sites, have apparently done a new network update, that simplifies the search, so that the search for each site covers the entire network, and not only brings up the model's content at the network, but also brings up hot links so you can access her content at the entire network, without having to log in to each site where her content is listed. This is a massive improvement on making the site and network easier to use: -Membership in any one of the Teen Mega World (TMW) network sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. There are no premium sites requiring extra payment to access. -There are over 30 sites in the network, covering many niches. This is a teen-focused network. -Network updates daily. -Network has over 5,000 videos. -Network has over 2,000 models. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. CONS(START OF): Cons are basically minor. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): Since the last network upgrade when they fixed the search engine from a limited search to your join site, to a general network search, the search and navigation has been greatly improved. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -The network focuses on teens. If you want older models, you should look elsewhere. -Almost all the teen models are from Eastern Europe (around Russia). So a lot of the dialog is in Russian. But what they're saying doesn't matter a lot, it's the action that counts. Do you care if they are saying "Hi, let's fuck." Or, "OOOhhhh, good fucking." I doubt conversations mean much anyway. These videos are focused on teens fucking and getting fucked. Or maybe masturbating. -The network used to be low-grade hardcore teen sex, with little money spent on the videos: the models wore cheap streat clothes, the scenes were shot in cheap rooms, with cheap furniture, low-quality video equipment. But over time, they invested the profits into upgrading the network quality: the sets are more expensive, the models, while not a lot of attention is put into making them attractive, are young teens who are naturally attractive, the lighting and video equipment was upgraded. So even though the network is not glam or heartcore, it's now has a lot of videos of fine quality: they even have 4K videos and Virtual Reality videos. -The network has both a secure (https) and non-secure (http) version. This is the first time I've ever seen a site or network offering both. It seems like a waste of bandwith to offer a non-secure version, if there is a secure version. My browser uses a popup when I start to enter my login details in the non-secure version: "This version is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised." Why not switch to a secure version, that is less likely to be hacked? -Also, it used to be easier to enter the htpps version of the sites, but currently, even when I can find an https version of one of the sites, when I hit the login link, it switches to the non-secure version, where my login details are not hidden, and the member pages I visit will be recorded by my ISP. -One video update per month. But the network has a daily update. So there is always something new, as well a ton of older material, much of which is worth viewing. -Sometimes there are glitches in the navigation: You can't find the https version of the site or network. Or you login to a site, and click through the video pages, except, when you examine the video thumbnail, it shows you are looking at thumbnails from a different site than what you're logged into. So how can you count the number of videos the site has, or look over the earliest videos of the site, since the video thumbnail pages are not separated as they should be? BOTTOM LINE(START OF): This network is one of my favorite hardcore teen networks. You have over 2,000 models, many of them attractive, that are willing and able to demonstrate an appetite for sex. The fact that many of the models speak in Russian or some slavic language is unimportant. The action is what counts. And these girls usually put on a great show. My other favorite teen hardcore network is what used to be called the Diesel Access network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn). Those models are among the prettiest and most beautiful models on the internet. And a lot of the girls are also into sex, with boys, or with each other if a boy is not around, or with themselves if they happen to be alone. For a lover of teen sex, you can't get better than the Teen Mega World and Diesel Access networks. (Except, Diesel Access dropped the name, and positioned the Wow Girls and Wow Porn sites as separate from the All Fine Girls site, except that all 3 sites are currently marketed so when you join any one of the three sites, you get access to all 3 sites. Which doesn't make a lot of sense, but maybe it's a business thing with the details of what's happening behind the scenes that would make sense why the Wow Girls and Wow Porn sites are being held separate from the All Fine Girls site. I'm giving the site (and network) a score of 92. If you're into hardcore teen porn, this is one of the finest networks around. 07-09-19  08:58am Replies (0) Review 204 Teenrs (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Teenrs.com is now part of the Adult Prime network. If you hit the PU link to Teenrs.com, and go to the join page, it shows that Teenrs is part of the Adult Prime network. Why is this important? The review of Teenrs at TBP (The Best Porn) is dated Aug 18, '18, and the facts are out of date. The review indicates Teenrs is a network with access to 2 sites. Teenrs, as part of the Adult Prime network, gives you access to over 90 studios, and a whole bunch of sites. However, if you aren't aware that Teenrs is part of the Adult Prime network, you can join Teenrs, even if you have already joined Adult Prime. When I opened the Teenrs web page, and hit the join link, I saw the join page inviting me to join the site. Even though I already have access to the site through my membership in Adult Prime. Cons: -No dedicated support team for the network. Apparently support is handled by the billing agents. My billing agent, VXSBill, has an email address, but might not reply to any questions, other than cancelling your sub. -Pre-checked cross-sales on join pages. -Captcha normally required for login. Bottom Line: With membership in the site, you get network access. And vice versa: with network access, you get the Teenrs site/channel access included. Adult Prime network stats: Video count: 20427 Photoset count: 22515 Updates: daily Teenrs stats: Videos: 49 Photosets: 46 The network (and the Teenrs site) focuses on teens. The best sites I've seen on the network are Club Sweethearts and Digital Desire, but there are plenty of other sites/studios that are worth exploring. And the teen models can be luscious, cute, lip-smacking adorable. The Teenrs site appears to be a mash-up of videos (and photosets) that were put into a site to create a porn site to make money. Little thought was put into making these videos. No theme was chosen, other than getting some young teen and filming them having sex. If the Teenrs site was eliminated from the Adult Prime network, the network would lose no value. The Teenrs site is basically worthless. I am giving the site a score of 93, because if you join Teenrs, you gain Adult Prime access. You could join Adult Prime directly, or one of the included sites to gain Adult Prime access. Edit: I am writing as a porn consumer. Not as a lawyer, or a porn professional. Technically, I don't know what the legal status of Teenrs is: I already joined Adult Prime. My email confirmation states "Membership Adultprime.com Approved". However, apparently I can join through the Teenrs portal, and pay a separate membership fee. What would I gain? Nothing, as far as I can tell. I would be gaining access to Adult Prime, which I already have. I've sent an email to vxs.com, the biller listed on my Adult Prime membership confirmation email. Waiting/hoping for a reply, that will explain if Teensrs has a separate existence from Adult Prime, in addition to being a channel in Adult Prime. I sent the email 5 days ago, have not gotten a reply yet. I should add that apparently Adult Prime doesn't have a dedicated customer support. Customer support is handled by its billing agents: Epoch, Segpay, VXSBill. Normally, a billing agent is separate from the site it supports. So how much information an agent at VSXBill would have about Adult Prime or Teenrs is debatable. They would have billing questions, cancel memberships, but knowledge about those sites would be limited, I assume. My membership to Adult Prime was handled by VXSBill. They have an email address, but no telephone or live chat is listed to contact them. I sent an email to VXSBill asking some questions, and hoping I will get a reply that answers: A copy of my email to VXSBill is as follows: ------ I just joined AdultPrime.com on 2021-11-23. Is Teenrs.com a separate network from AdultPrime, or is it only a channel in the AdultPrime network? Can you be a member of AdultPrime, and also be a separate member of Teensrs? Or does membership in AdultPrime mean you are automatically a member of Teenrs? Does AdultPrime membership give you access to Teenrs? Does Teensrs membership give you access to AdultPrime? Thanks for any information you can give me. ------ (The form for the internal email did not request any membership details about my membership to Adult Prime, such as login details or membership #, or even the site I was a member of. Which seems strange, since most other billers want that information before they give you any information about your membership.) 12-16-21  02:23pm Replies (2) Review 205 Teens Analyzed (0) 69.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: Note: It looks like the Teens Analyzed site and the 18videoz did a very recent update. 18videoz now gives you access to 16 sites, instead of the 18 sites it gave you until recently. Teens Analyzed is no longer part of the 18videoz network. This probably happened in the last few weeks. The 18videoz site does not explain dropping the Teens Analyzed site from the network access. I don't know if I'm considered a member of the Teens Analyzed site. Until a few weeks ago, I was a member, through my membership in 18videosz network. PROS -Join through the 18videoz site for $60/year. If you join through the Teens Analyzed site, you are charged $120/year. Both sites, until recently, gave you access to the same network sites. I don't know if joining through Teens Analyzed gives you access to a few more sites or not, but in my opinion, paying a premium price for access to Teens Analyzed is not worth the extra money. -18videoz.com network now gives you access to 16 sites. Cons: PROS(continued): Until recently (within the last few weeks), you had access to 18 sites. -Low cost site. I got a 1-year membership for $60, which is the current price for 18videoz site/network. The current price for Teens Analyzed site (which includes the 18videoz network plus maybe a few more sites) is $120/year. -The site and network is teen hardcore. -Reality based porn. -Not a lot of plot build-up. A guy and girl might tell each other hi, and then it's time to fuck. So no romance or build-up. -Same login details work for all sites in the network you have access to. -Video definition is mobile through 1080p. -Site has 286 videos. -The network gives you access to 3,278 videos. -The content is mainly exclusive. I've only seen one video at the network that appears at competing networks. -Customer support is Vendo. Which has a responsive live chat that is 24/7. -Epoch is the primary biller. One of the trusted names. -Unlimited downloads. Bottom Line: CONS(START OF): -They have changed the structure of the Teens Analyzed site. So I'm still unsure of how to navigate the site. I haven't found the link to streaming videos. Maybe they will add streaming later, but for now, it appears to be dropped. So it's much easier to download a video and watch it on my PC. -Archive site. They advertise 2 updates per week, but the last update was November 13, 2018. -Login and member pages are not secure. You get a popup warning from your browser that login details are open to hacking. -Username and password are computer generated. Impossible to remember. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -A wide range of model attractiveness: there are some really cute girls, but little effort is made to present the models attractively. Except that many of the girls are really cute, and they don't need make-up or special costumes for their young beauty to shine through. -Once in a while, you hit the login page link, and get the error message: 502 Bad Gateway. -This is not a con of the search: but if you put in a model's name, you can find many models share the same name, so you have to check the thumbnails to see which model you are looking for. -Default filename for videos is "fulllength-high.wmv", so you have to manually rename the files to show the model name, site name, etc. -Once in a while your login details do not work. I assume the reason is the site is forcing members to reset their password for security purposes, instead of the password being hacked. I've had to re-set my password a few times every few months, because the old password stopped working. -I think they updated the public page for the site. They now advertise that the network has 28 sites. However, if you count the number of sites listed, it's now 16 sites for the 18Videoz network. And the number of sites for the Teens Analyzed site is hard to determine. They also advertise that new sites are coming, but I put little faith in that claim. -The coding for the videos is not efficient. A video file in 1080p with a runtime of 28 minutes 33 seconds takes 1.23 GB storage space. The video total bitrate is 6192kbps with a framerate of 25.00 frames/second. BOTTOM LINE -Site theme: First anal sex makes these teenies scream of painful pleasure. That is the theme, but I doubt any of these girls are having anal sex for the first time. Video runtime is usually 20 to 30 minutes. Video definition goes from mobile to 1080p. That is for all the videos, even the earliest ones from 2012. Maybe I was being too harsh when I said that there is no setup to the sex. For example, one video shows a teen coughing, she calls a doctor, who shows up wearing a mask (and this was in 2012, before the Covid epidemic). He takes her temp, looks in her mouth, touches her throat, she starts stroking his arm (I guess it's different in Eastern Europe: if a doctor touches your throat, the correct response is to stroke the doctor's arm), she starts to giggle, and touches his shoulder, then starts stroking his groin (he's still wearing his doctor's clothes), then she takes off the doctor's mask, so he can suck and lick her titties, and it's time for the good old blowjob-vaginal-anal-intercourse routine. I'm moving to Europe, where I can find some of these good-looking horny Russian babes. I still think there is little build-up to the sex, unless you count a minute or two of a guy and girl looking at each other before the sex begins. Actually, I'm surprised the quality of the videos is as good as it is. Many of the videos have professional camera-work (good focus, no jiggles from the camera), good lighting, an OK to a nice setting. But the main attraction is the level of attractiveness of the young, teenage models: you have some real cuties here, that you will have seen at many other sites: mainly Eastern European teen models. Teens Analyzed is one of the better sites in what used to be the 18Videoz network. But I don't think the Teens Analyzed site is still considered part of the 18Videoz network, because it's not listed in the current listing of 18Videoz sites. I'm giving the Teens Analyzed site a score of 69. That is very subjective. The main objection is the membership price: $120/year is way too high. This is an archive site. That stopped updating 2 years ago. There are other cons: For one, I think Teens Analyzed is no longer part of the 18Videoz network). Another problem: they seem to have dropped the option to stream videos. Another problem: the structure of the Teens Analyzed site is buggy: For example, the link "Bonuses" brings up a page that states "There are no such bonus There are no such bonus". I think they are working on the structure of the site, and there are bugs that need to be fixed. The streaming option seems to have disappeared. The model listing seems to have disappeared. I would not pay the premium membership to join this site. 11-02-20  02:41am Replies (0) Review 206 Teeny Lovers (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the teen network 18Videoz. You get access to the entire 18Videoz network. No sites require a premium membership. -The models at the site are basically young teens (18 to early 20s). Most of them are attractive to very attractive. They are from Eastern Europe, almost all white, slender to medium build. Very few implants, not a lot of tattoos. -The public page does a good job showing you the kinds of models at this site. The thumbnails are approximately 3"x4" on a 27" monitor. The thumbnails are brightly lit. -The site is currently updating. -Recent videos are offered in 240p, 720p, 1080p. -Photosets have around 56+ photos per set. Cons: -Very little information about the site or network from the public pages. You can't get an idea of the update rate for the site or network. You can't get any idea of how many videos a model has, or an overview of the model listing. -The videos are slightly disappointing. In spite of the cute girls, many of the older videos seem low-rent. The sets are mainly a room in a cheap apartment, the video usually seems like it was filmed cheaply. The videos often seem to have a film over the lens that makes the images seem un-vivid (not sharp, vibrant colors and flesh tones and immediacy--you are seeing images in a very slight fog, almost). Bottom Line: I should note that over the last few years the network and site have tried to improve the video quality with better sets, better costumes, better lighting. Having said that, if you compare Teeny Lovers and the 18Videoz network with the Wow network, the Wow network gives you a higher quality experience. Comparing the Teeny Lover site and the 18Videoz network to the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), the quality of the videos at the Wow network is a better value experience. Wow network videos have nicer sets, better videography, better overall lighting, that make you really appreciate how physically attractive the models can be. The 18Videoz network has plenty of physically attractive teen models, but the videos and photosets don't showcase their beauty. Which is a shame. The Teen Lovers site has a zip file for each photoset. But in only 1 definition. The Wow network photosets have your choice of 4 definitions for each photoset. 18 Videoz photos download in sets with photos that are 1666 pixels x 2500 pixels, which would seem to indicate superior quality. But looking at the individual photos, there is often a focus issue with the photos, and the photos don't have the vibrant colors of the Wow network photos. The photosets at the Wow network are so much better: Better colors. You choice of 4 definitions for the zip file photoset. Better focus of the photos. Nicer sets. The models just appear more attractive and appealing. 18Videoz and Wow network often run special discounts. You can often find 18Videoz network for $60/year. You can often find Wow network for $60/year. Or for $70/year. I'm currently paying $70/year for a Wow network sub, but I hope to remember to cancel before it re-bills and start a new sub at $60/year. A few years ago I was paying $120/year for the 3 Wow network sites, plus a separate fee for the Ultra Films site. You now get Ultra Films and the 3 Wow network sites in a subscription to any one of the sites. Note: Porn sites normally do not reward members for loyalty. They will often give new members a lower membership price than recurring members. And most porn sites, when you renew your membership, will gladly charge you your higher recurring price than emails or other offers of a lower membership price. So it pays to shop around to see what the lowest price is for a membership to a porn site. I was paying $120 for the Wow network, and, I'm not positive, at least $60 or more for the Ultra Films site. Until I cancelled and renewed for $70 for all 4 sites. I think 18 Videoz and the Teeny Lovers are good teen site. But I think the Wow network + Ultra Films is a better experience. The videos and photosets are better quality. And if you can find an email for $60/year for the Wow network (which includes Ultra Films, even though Ultra Films is not listed as part of the Wow network), I would jump on it. Wow network has lovely young teens expressing the joy of sex. 08-08-22  06:34pm Replies (0) Review 207 Teeny Lovers (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -The models are attractive teens. Site (and 18Videoz network) does a great job finding cute young teens. Some girls might be in their early twenties, but these girls look young (but still legal). -There is a text description of the video that is brief but covers the minor plot. There's almost no plot. You have a guy, a girl, and they've got sex on the brain. You have to admire these Russians, they don't waste a lot of time on non-essentials before getting to the sex. -The tags also do a fine job tagging the action. -Navigation is simple and easy. The site structure is basic: not a lot of bells and whistles, but that's good, because the site focuses on giving you a lot of hot teen sex. -You are allowed to comment on the videos. And the comments can be worth reading. They show that the members really appreciate how attractive these models are, how hot the sex can be. The sex is straight-forward, not over-the-top acrobatics, almost no seduction or build-up, but these models are cute. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): And you don't need a plot or seduction to enjoy watching these teens expose their bodies and get it on. I don't know why it doesn't get boring. At many competing sites, the sex can get boring because of stupid plots and poor acting. Here, you focus on these teen models, their fine bodies, and it's fucking erotic. -A very long time before you are logged out for site inactivity. -Unlimited streaming. -Unlimited downloads. -All videos are available in low, medium and high definition. 4K definition was introduced in late 2016. CONS(START OF): -This is strange. The login can be secure or non-secure. Once you get to the members area, the members pages can be secure or non-secure. I've never seen a network where this happens. Normally you have secure login and member pages, or login and members pages are non-secure. But not at this network. -The photosets are disappointing. They are low quality screen shots not worth collecting. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -There is a zip file for the photosets. But it's in only one definition. -The default file name of the downloaded screenshot zip file is the title of the video. So if you do want to collect these photosets, you have to manually add the model's name, date posted, and site. -When I open a photo from the photoset, and try to manually go through the photos, the photos don't show in order: instead, the photos appear in a random manner. The photos in a set are numbered 1 through XX (up to 100), but they display in a random order, or they don't play in a slide show properly. I check to see that I haven't selected "random order", and the program is set for a normal slideshow. But the screen shots do not display in normal order. I test to see if my program is working, with a photoset from Metart or Domai, and those sets display normally. But not the sets from Teeny Lovers. The problem seems to be the decoding embedded in the screen cap files. -Another odd thing about the screen cap files: I open a screen cap file, it's a jpg file. It shows the method is deflated. But the computer does not show/allow the dimensions of the file, which most photosets do allow. The computer shows the file is 649 KB, which is a large size for a jpg file. But no dimensions/definition are shown. Not only do the screen shot files take a lot of storage space, but they hide the security and details that are shown on most photoset files. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Number of videos: 502. Videos are available in your choice of definition of low, medium, high, higher, and UHD. UHD was made available starting in late 2016. Photosets (really screen shot sets): 50 to 100 screen shots per set. Number of photosets: 502 (one photoset for each video). Number of updates per month: 3 or 4 videos(with accompanying photoset). Teeny Lovers is a good-sized site: 502 videos. You also get access to about 17 other sites in the network. The site (and network) is teen orientated. The main strength of the site (and network) is how cute most of these teens are. If you are into teens, you've seen these teens at such sites as Teen Mega World, Wow sites, Team Skeet, etc. There are also a few that have been featured at the Metart network. The simple navigation is also a plus factor for the site and network. The site is easy to navigate. You can switch between sites in the network, without having to re-login. The content for each model is brought at the network is brought up when you click on the model's name. There is a model's page, that gives you a nice thumbnail of the model and a brief listing of her physical attributes, including her date of birth. If you want to join, join through the 18Videoz site: There are discounts for joining the 18Videoz site that should be easy to find: I paid $60/year. There is also a $15/month option. Both of these choices include full streaming and unlimited downloads. If you join through the Teeny Lovers site, or one of the other sites in the network, you will probably pay a much higher price, maybe even double. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites that require extra payment. I definitely think Teeny Lovers (and the 18 Videoz network) are worthwhile joins. Mainly because of the very attractive teen models. The site/network is easy to use. If you are into hardcore teen, this site is worth joining. The plots are simple, they don't put much effort into making the models attractive. But these are young teens who are naturally attractive, they were selected because they are attractive, and willing and able to display their charms on video. It's bread-and-butter sex, not glamour or sensual, but can be hot. And the models are yummy. 06-19-21  05:07am Replies (0) Review 208 Teeny Lovers (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -The site has a lot of cute teens. But not much effort is put into making them as attractive as possible. -You have a choice of two formats for videos: MP4 and WMV. But the MP4 has more definitions to offer. From mobile to 4K (Ultra High Definition). -The photosets have a zip file, that downloads with the title of the video (but not the model's name). Cons: -Although the photosets have about 60 photos per set, the individual photos are screencaps, that are not very good. I'm seen much better screencaps at other sites that were produced by a software program that makes photosets from a video shoot. So even if the model is attractive, and many of these models are, the photoset is not worth collecting. You could problably produce your photosets from the downloaded video with better quality from a free software program. -Slow update rate: 2 or 3 videos per month. You also get matching photosets with each video. -Login and member pages are not secure. Not https. So easy to hack login details. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Username and password are computer-generated. Bottom Line: Site stats: Movies: 460 Models: 2249 Photosets: 2468 Videos run about 30 minutes or less. Site theme: teens fucking. A guy fucks a girl. Very basic teen hardcore sex. Many of the models are cute to very attractive, but not much effort is put into making the models look good. The good looks come from their youth (18 to early 20s in age), and the care taken to select good looking girls. The vibe of the site is the same basic vibe used for most of the 18Videoz sites: this is reality-based porn, and no effort is made to glamorize the movies with nice clothes, expensive sets, great lighting: they are trying to present videos that look like they were shot by an amateur, even though the videos are professionally shot: but the clothes, settings, models, are trying to present an everyday hardcore sex scene that is a girl or a guy/girl having sex. Not over the top sex, but sex in which both parties are getting their kicks. So the sex they show is teen hardcore sex, no glamor, just blowjob mixed with vaginal and anal fucking. Even though many of the models are cute teens at Teeny Lovers, I much prefer watching the videos at Teen Mega World, or at the Wow sites, or the sites that are run by the Wow managers (Ultra Films). The Teen Mega World is straight teen hardcore, the Wow sites and Ultra Films add a touch of glamour, but the Teen Mega World videos are just more enjoyable, and the network has a ton of lovely young teens. The Wow sites and Ultra Films have many of the same models as the Teen Mega World network, and the quality of the videos and photo sets at these sites is outstanding: gorgeous teens, high production values for the videos and photos. I'm giving the site a score of 82. That's very random. If watching a guy and girl get it on, and you don't need any frills to make it more interesting, this site might be worth joining. Especially if you can catch a holiday discount. I joined for 12 months for $60. The Best Porn lists the following memberships: Monthly: $29.95 (recurring) Multi-Mo: $49.95 (3 months, non-recurring) 1 Year: $119.95 (recurring) I would advise joining Teen Mega World, if you can catch a low-priced offer. Or, pay a slightly higher price, and join one of the Wow sites (you get All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn with a membership in any one of the 3 sites). 06-10-20  10:03am Replies (0) Review 209 That Sitcom Show (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -I want to thank PU member Wraith0711 for pointing out in a comment ThatSitComShow and HotCrazyMess are included as bonus sites in a membership with NubilesFilm. The NubilesFilm site itself doesn't seem to advertise you get the bonus sites, so unless you are sharp-eyed or detail oriented like Wraith0711, you don't see all the content available to you with a membership. -I joined Nubiles Films in September 2019 for a year-long membership. That's why I am saying I'm been a member of That Sitcom Show for 6-12 months. I'm not sure when they added That Sit Com Show as a bonus site. -ThatSitcomShow (and Nubiles Films) is currently running a special discount of $84/year. -You get a bunch of different content options: Video (streaming and downloading), Pics, Screenshots. -Downloads are offered in 270p through 1080p. -Streaming quality is 270p through 720p. -Content is exclusive. -Streaming and downloading are unlimited. -Login and member pages are https. Cons: -That Sitcom Show's last update was 2019-09-20. So it's an archive site. And with the coronavirus epidemic, it will probably stay an archive site, as the virus shuts down porn production around the world for months or more. -Small site. Only 44 videos. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The videos are boring. That's my personal reaction. Maybe other people will find them funny and worth watching, or sexy. Time and money and talent was spent making the the videos. Bottom Line: That Sitcom Show features the porn parodies of popular TV shows: Two Men, Big Bang, Friends With Benefits, Threesome Company, Married With Issues, and a bunch of other TV shows are featured. I don't watch a lot of regular TV, so I'm not familiar with most (or any) of the TV shows that are being parodied. I won't enjoy the parodies as much as someone who is a regular watcher of those shows. I won't catch the jokes as easily, the jokes will have less meaning for me. I think the Nubile Films site (that is part of the package of Nubiles Film, That SitCom Show and Hot Crazy Mess) is the star of the 3 sites. Nubiles Films is an outstanding hardcore site, with outstanding models that range from attractive to lovely, and high level videos that are gorgeous to watch: well lit, beautifully filmed. That SitCom Show is less appealing. It's porn parodies, not my favorite niche. Since I'm unfamiliar with the TV shows being parodied, I can't appreciate the parodies as much as someone who is familiar with the original content of the TV shows. I think they put a lot of thought and effort into making a quality product of the parodies. There is a good audience laugh track for the show, the models (male and female) are actually actors, who do a much better job acting than most porn models. There is a real plot involved in the episodes. The female models are attractive. One problem watching these parodies: my mind knows these are parodies. So I can't watch them as straight porn, I'm trying to find the humor in the video, since that is what a parody is supposed to be: an exaggerated version of something that has a humorous factor. So the humor gets in the way of reacting to a sex scene. Do you remember the movie, "Fast Times at Ridgemont High"? The classic scene with Phoebe Cates coming out of the swimming pool in a red bikini. Phoebe Cates, lovely face, fantastic body, she unhooks the top of her bikini and shows her breasts. One of the most iconic sex scenes of the early 1980s. Not much sex, just a fantastic looking girl and brief flash of breasts. But that scene had it all. One of the most beautiful girls of all time, topless, humor and wit. Not a parody, but just a great fucking scene in a very good movie. I can't appreciate the videos in That Sit Com Shows. I know they are good quality videos: the acting is far superior to the acting of most porn models. The video technical quality is good. The script is good. I think the problem is that I'm want porn to be hot, arousing. And the scenes don't turn me on. The Phoebe Cates scene in Fast Times at Ridgemont High was shocking. I kept thinking what a fucking gorgeous girl Phoebe Cates is. And the humor and wit were just added bonuses. But the parodies at That Sit Com Shows don't excite my admiration or excitement. They are nicely done, far better than what I was expecting. But so what? They are not what I'm looking for in porn. I remember going to New York City in the 1970s and watching Candide on Broadway. Candide was based on a novel by Voltaire and was a satire on Leibniz's philosophy of optimism. The play was enjoyable and exciting. Not porn, but interesting. The porn parodies are not especially interesting. Not especially fun. Maybe if I was a fan of the TV series the videos are based on, they might have more interest and be funnier for me. But even though I think the porn videos are done very well, they are boring for me. Bottom Line: Pros: They've put a lot of time and effort and talent into making good porn parodies of TV shows. Login and member pages are https. The models are surprisingly good actors. The scripts are good. Cons: The videos are boring for me. The site is small. 44 videos. The site's last update was 2019-09-20. I'm giving the site a score of 75. 04-20-20  08:25pm Replies (5) Review 210 The Lesbian Experience (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -The site is part of the New Sensations network. Site contents (and network contents) is exclusive, as far as I can tell. -The videos and photosets are professionally produced: Excellent technical production values: clear, crisp images, nice sets, nice costumes (mainly ordinary clothes, but not cheap clothes), excellent lighting and sound control. -Multiple definitions and multiple bit rates for each video. -There are many attractive models at the site and network, that make the site a worthwhile join. Elsa Jean, Lena Anderson, Amber Moore, Ivy Wolfe, Kenna James, Blake Eden, Riley Reid, Charlotte Stokely are some of my favorites. -You get over 7500 videos at the network. -Login and member pages are secure (https). Cons: -Poor search box. You put in a model's name, and the hits are random. Even though the model is featured at the site and network, the search often returns a bunch of different models, but not the one you're looking for. Worthless. A different way of searching for a particular model is to look under the first letter of her first name. But although the return page lists models with that first letter, the names are not listed alphabetically, so you might have to look through 4 or 5 pages before you find your model. Why not put the names of the models in alphabetical order? -The site has a very slow update rate. The first video was posted 05/23/2013. It's now 03/08/23, almost 10 years later. The site has 157 videos. So it averages 16 videos per year. -I've been experiencing failed downloads at the network. It might be my computer. But the failed downloads don't automatically resume, so I have to delete the failed files and re-start from the beginning. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: The videos try to give some meaning to the sex with a plot. Which can be worthwhile. After a while, you can get tired of two or more bodies slapping against each other, if that's all the meaning of the sex. Here's a sentimental story of 2 young girls finding each other: It Started With A Kiss For Riley and Elsa: Starring Riley Reid and Elsa Jean The world needs love. Evil forces from Russia are invading Ukraine and killing innocent men, women and children. That's why it essential to find some happiness. And The Lesbian Experience can provide uplifting videos. Elsa Jean is a sweet, innocent woman-child who dreams of having sex with her attractive roommate. Dreams are not enough, and masturbation is only a stopgap measure. When Riley returns home, Jean makes a move on Riley, and their love blossoms. This is such a sweet story. It restores your faith in humanity. -The site teaches valuable life lessons. First, even though a Hitachi wand can be used to achieve orgasm, it doesn't compare to the feel of a lovely young female partner: Something about a real human partner puts it above a mechanical toy. Some of the videos are model interviews. Some of the girls come across as real human beings. And most of them are very young, 18 to early 20s. They're trying to have fun and make a bit of money. Most porn starlets last only a few years before dropping out of the business. I assume you need a teflon skin to survive as a porn starlet. The Lesbian Experience posted their first video on 05/23/2013, starring Dani Daniels and Mia Malkova. They offered 720p and 1080p definitions, in multiple bit rates for each definition. You could stream or download the videos. They also offered a photoset, viewable online or in a zip file for download. The photoset had 88 photos, with real photos, not screenshots. The photos are not glamour style, more like home photography style. The girls are attractive, but little effort is made to make them look as attractive as possible. The gallery is best used as a reminder of what the video looks like. So even though the models can be attractive, they are not presented as attractively as possible, and I wouldn't collect most of these galleries. Site started offering 4K videos in 2018. I really enjoyed watching some of the videos at The Lesbian Experience. You get a lot of lovely or attractive young models to view, and the stories are simple but a cut above the stupid parodies featured at many porn sites. Whether you think the site and network is worth a longer membership is strictly personal. But if you can find a $60/year membership, offered throughout the year, I think the site and network is worth joining. Because some of the videos can be hot. And there are plenty of young models to enjoy in living color that is crisply filmed. 03-08-23  01:43am Replies (0) Review 211 The Lesbian Experience (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Updated: 03-06-22  12:19pm  (Update History) Reason: Membership price increased. That is important. Pros: NOTE: prices went up after I joined. Now costs around $95/year, or $30/month. Very expensive compared to what I paid. -The Lesbian Experience is a site in the New Sensations network. -There are no premium sites in the New Sensations network that you have to pay extra for. All sites are included. -Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. For all sites in the network. -Navigation is simple for the site and the network. Can arrange the site videos chronologically or alphabetically. -Starting in 2018, the site offered 4K definition. The 4K definition is offered in multiple bit rates. Before 2017, all videos were offered in 720p and 1080p, in multiple bit rates. -The videos are mainly sex scenes, but there are also interview videos, where the models talk about getting into porn, how long they've been in porn, a slight bit about personal history. Some members consider the interview videos boring, but I like to watch them to see if the models show a tiny amount of personality. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -The models are mainly A-list porn stars, that you've seen on many different porn sites. Almost all are attractive to extremely attractive. CONS(START OF): -The cons are basically minor. -This is a niche site, focusing on lesbian sex. If you're not into lesbian sex, the site will hold little interest, in spite of the very attractive models. -Watching these videos can destroy your faith in human nature. You will come across scenes where married women (women married to a guy, women married to a girl), will have sex with a different woman, breaking the bonds of holy matrimony. Not only will these lesbian sluts have illicit sex, but they will do it with moans and groans of sexual ecstasy. -Also, I've watched some of these same women who are admitted lesbians, have sex with men on other sites. That is a crime that I don't even know what to call it. -There are ads on every member page. Standard for porn sites. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): There is a second pre-checked cross-sale on another join page. -This is just personal opinion, but many models seem pressured to have surgeries to enhance their physical appearance. I prefer a natural look with less surgical scarring and less botox-enhanced lips/whatever. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): If you're in the mood for lesbian sex, The Lesbian Experience seems like a good place to visit. -It's low-cost membership fee is attractive: $60/year. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -Quality videos, up to 4K starting in 2018. Nice sets, good colors and lighting, attractive models. The scenes have minimal plots: there's a tiny amount of seduction, and then the sex. You're supposed to think that all attractive women are horny as hell. On the negative side, the update rate is irregular, like many of the New Sensations sites. The last update was 10/31/2021, an interview video. So I don't know if this is an archive site with no more updates, or just another site with very irregular updates. 145 videos. Most are sex scenes, but some are interviews with the models. The videos all have 720p and 1080p definitions offered, with multiple bit rates. Starting in 2018, they offered a 4K definition for the videos. Also, with multiple bit rates. Since I have a slow wifi connection, I stream with the lowest definition, for less pauses. I shouldn't have to do this, because the computer and devices I use report my wifi connection should be fast enough to stream without pauses, but in the real world, the fucking videos pause all the time while streaming. The best way to get around this is to download the videos and watch from the downloaded video file on my PC. It's good to watch a couple of cute lezzies fooling around, kissing, hugging, snuggling, cuddling before they get down to serious sex. The background music shouldn't be too distracting, and the camera-work should be steady and calm, not jerky or out of focus. The Lesbian Experience gives good quality videos, not a lot of plot, but if the models are cute and in the mood, it makes for good porn. 03-06-22  07:07am Replies (0) Review 212 The Life Erotic (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the MetArt network. So the basic site structure is basically the same for all the MetArt network of 15+ sites. This means you get all the trimmings of a first-class photo oriented site: -High, medium and low resolution zips for each photoset. -Complete model listing with large-sized thumbnails of the models, with links to each model's content at the site. -Superior support for email which is 24/7. But a live chat option would be even better. The support staff will go out of their way to help with any requests. Probably the finest support of any network, except for Vendo and Famesupport, both of which have a live chat option plus the standard email and telephone support that is 24/7. -Easy navigation. Can search by model's name, or by title of the photoset or video, or by date posted. -Good update rate. They update with a new video or photoset every 2 days, which they've continued even during the covid epidemic. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Most of the content is exclusive. But some of the older content is from other sites. If you're a porn expert, you might recognize some of the content from Teen Mega World or other competing sites. -PU has a discounted price of $19.99/month. Regular price is $29.99/month. -No download or streaming limits. Which is nice, in this era of sites setting daily or monthly limits for downloads. -All videos have a choice of 270p through 1080p. Videos posted from Mar 15, 2015 on have a 4K option. CONS(START OF): -Cons are basically minor. -Searching by posting date is a little clunky. The main Metart site used to have a simpler system, where each year was laid out more easily. But now you have to find the link for each year and each month you want to search, which takes more clicks. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites, but a little disappointing for a premium porn site that's part of the Metart network. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Videos start with the standard Metart intro visual and theme music, which lasts less than 1 minute. I wish they would drop the intro visual and theme music, which they use for many of the videos at the different Metart network sites. It's a form of advertising, but it's waste of time to watch. I'm being picky, but after seeing the same intro to over 1,000 different videos at the Metart sites, I wish they would eliminate it, or have an option to skip past the intro section. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The Life Erotic shares some of the models from the Metart.com site, but also uses a lot of models that are more into midcore. The main Metart.com site is strictly softcore glamcore (although they have been trying to make it a little edgier, with some of the photosets and videos allowing the models to fondle themselves a little). The Life Erotic mainly features female mastubation. There is also some solo nudity and some lesbian sex. To add spice, the model can use toys, fancy costumes, ropes or chains for a hint of BDSM. Some of the videos can be intriguing or amusing. One video with Riya, a cute, tiny (5' 2") blonde, aged 18, has Riya walk into her kitchen get a glass of water. She drinks some water, notices a banana, sucks on it, rubs the banana on her crotch, get a condom from a drawer, puts the condom over the banana, and inserts the banana into her pussy. First time I've seen a banana getting a condom. Riya then masturbates with the condonized banan. After she reaches orgasm, she removes the banana, removes the condom and throws it away, then peels the banana and eats it, pumping it in and out her mouth as she savors its sweet flesh… One of the main lessons from this site is that girls don't need boys to get off: a toy (or fingers) can be an excellent substitute for a boy. Or even another girl. Metart is supposed to be erotic glamcore without any sex, just nudity. No boys allowed at the site (except for male photographers or videographers). The Life Erotic is erotic glamcore with sex. Mainly solo masturbation by the models, with and without toys, with and without costumes. But there are also some lesbian scenes. Again, no boys allowed at the site. Comparing the two sites, Metart is probably the premier softcore site on the internet, for several different reasons: -The vast number of photosets (22,264). -The vast number of models (3,813). -The large number of contributing photograpers (289) who can give you their personal viewpoint on the photosets. -4 updates daily, except 6 updates on the first of each month. -The complete model listing with large-sized thumbnails that show you what the models look like, and that have links to their content at the site. -The easy navigation of the site, in spite of the massive amount of content. -And a number of bells and whistles that make it easy to format the site offerings to your individual taste. The Life Erotic is a much smaller site. Instead of the softcore approach of the Metart site, The Life Erotic shows the models as sexual creatures. Like Metart, there are no boys at The Life Erotic site, but the girls show you that boys aren't needed to get off: the solo nude scenes, with and without masturbation, can be very erotic, especially with the right costumes and toys and the implied story line behind the photosets and videos. And the lesbian scenes, which are in the minority, also show some edge in presenting the models. Both sites have a huge number of attractive models. Most of the models are white, mainly from Eastern Europe, but there are a few Asian, African, and Latina models, but non-white are definitely in the minority. If you want a more erotic site than Metart, The Life Erotic might be a good choice. Both sites have the same price of $19.95/month, with a discount from PU. I suggest a 1-month sub to both sites, if you have the money, to see which site you enjoy more. 02-17-21  03:26pm Replies (0) Review 213 The Life Erotic (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Site is part of the MetArt network of sites. So the level of attractiveness of the models is above average, and the site navigation is above average. -No download limits, no streaming limits. -PU offers a site discount of $19.99/month recurring. -with a catalog of thousands of models and photosets, there is a wealth of gorgeous models to browse. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Poor search engine. Considering that this is one of the smaller sites in the MetArt network, the poor search is suprising. If you look for the content of a contributing photographer, it only returns a portion of his content. -The MetArt network did a network update around 2019 that was supposed to make the sites faster and more responsive. I don't find the lastest network update an improvement. Opinions vary: some MetArt site members are happy with the update. -The ages of the models are creeping up, and the level of attractiveness is dropping. The attractiveness level is a personal opinion. Many site members are almost fanatical in praising the beauty of the models. -A number of photo sets have very few photos. Most of the MetArt network sites emphasize photos over videos. The model Roxio has 8 photo sets at TLE.The number of photos per set varies from 28 to 80. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): It just seems strange for a site that specializes in high resolution glamour photography to have photosets with less than 100 photos per set. Six of the Roxio photosets were first posted at the BodyInMind site (a competing site), and then resold to TheLifeErotic site. Unless you have a wide experience of softcore porn, you will probably find that most of the content at TheLifeErotic is exclusive. But there are definitely a small number of photo sets at TLE that are posted at other sites. -Beyond a few basic stats on the model, there is no information on the model. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): There's an excellent article on phone sex that can give an insight into how a phone sex operator works. The article is both readable and funny, and full of insights into sex and porn. https://www.marieclaire.com/sex-love/a20...-phone-sex-operator/ The TLE site, as part of the MetArt network, is a good site. Good, but not great. I would recommend joining the original MetArt site itself, which has, for the same price, a much larger number of models, much larger catalog of photosets and videos, far greater number of updates on a daily basis. The MetArt site is the star of the MetArt network. The MetArt site is basically softcore. Many of the other sites in the network offer a harder edge in erotic content. But in terms of softcore content, the MetArt site blows away the other sites in the network. If you are overdosed on softcore glam, then visiting one of the other sites in the MetArt network can be a worthwhile experience. But I think the original MetArt site offers better value for your money. 02-03-20  12:54am Replies (0) Review 214 The Tabu Tales (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the New Sensations network. Membership in any one site gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for. -Unlimited streaming. -There is a daily download limit of 300GB. Which seems huge to me. Limits are not a pro, normally. But only a purist is going to complain about a daily limit of 300 GB. -Content is exclusive. -You get your choice of multiple definitions for streaming and/or downloading videos. Also, videos will give you multiple bit rates. Seems like over-kill to me, with multiple bit rates, but maybe people with high-end equipment can appreciate the choices. -The photosets to illustrate the video are not simple screenshots of the video, but real photos. And the photosets offer a different version of the video. It's not a copy of the video, but the same scene from a different perspective. Very unusual. Actually, this is the only network I've seen this at. It's like they did the scene in a rehearsal, Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): with the models allowed to improvise. So the photoset is related to the video, but the action/plot varies from the video. -I find some of the interviews interesting. It can give you a hint of what the model is like. CONS(START OF): -Cons are minor. This a good site. Not all the sites are fine, you have some clunkers, but overall, this is a fine network. -You see a video you like, but don't know what site in the network it belongs to. Most videos are watermarked with the "New Sensations" logo, not with the site. And there is no text description that indicates what site the video/photoset belongs to. Not a problem, except if you're trying to write a review for the site the video belong to. The HotWifeXXX videos do have the HOTWIFEXXX.COM logo in their videos. FamilyXXX videos also have that logo in their videos. The Lesbian Experience videos have that logo in their videos. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -The number of sites keeps changing. At one time they used to advertise around 20 separate sites, but currently, there are maybe 12 sites, with other videos being lumped into what are called series or DVD. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Tabu Tales focuses on sinful sex. Which is basically meaningless in today's porn: almost all sex is considered taboo, unless you're married and fucking your wife in the missionary position. And even then, if you're filming it, that would be a sin. Or if someone else is watching. Or if one of the partners is having dirty thoughts during sex, that would be sinful. The tabu sex featured at the site is sex between step relatives. -The site and network are excellent. The contents have improved over time, the models are picked to be attractive, the plots usually make sense, the acting is better than at many porn sites. The video quality is good to excellent: nice sets, good focus, good lighting, good sound control. Some of the videos can be really hot. And most of them are enjoyable. I realize personal taste can vary widely. I just went to a Mexican restaurant yesterday, my neighbors told me (husband, wife, older daughter) the restaurant was great. I ate there, thought the restaurant was shit, the pinto beans were hard, the cheese enchiladas were lousy-a tortilla wrapped around some melted cheese that was cold. I realize that opinions can vary widely, but I was really disappointed with the restaurant. But I enjoy the New Sensations network. I've found some videos that I really enjoy. And found plenty of others that are worth watching. The New Sensations models are attractive. There are other sites with models that are even more attractive, but the New Sensations models are fine. And some of their videos are hot. Also, the nice-sized thumbnails used to illustrate the individual videos are bright and showcase the models attractively. Some of the thumbnails are jpegs, that if you hover your mouse over the thumbnail, it gives you a brief clip of the model in action. I enjoy looking at some of these models. Many of the models are attractive, but some just seem to have extra appeal. Again, personal tastes vary, but some models are just fucking appealing. You need a plot that fits your tastes, a model that you find really attractive, but the combination makes a video and site worth joining. Bottom line: Tabu Tales is not the best site in the New Sensations network. The premise of the plots are not as strong as in some sites, the level of attractiveness of the models is not as high. But since you paid for your membership, scan the site to see which videos appeal to you. The site stopped updating years ago. Which was a good thing, because that allowed them to focus on providing content to other network sites. The network offers straight and lesbian sex, some interracial sex, gangbang porn, taboo porn, and other niches. Some early content is only available in SD definition. And early videos have a photoset made of screencaps instead of real photos. But that shows the network has been improving steadily over the years, and has been offering 4K format over the last few years. Every so often New Sensations offers a $60/year price, which is a substantial discount from the PU discounted price of $95.40/year or $119.95/year. The monthly, multi-month, and yearly membership options come with full streaming and downloading privileges. I believe the 3 day trial for $4.95 might be a limited trial. I'm not sure, since I've never used it. I always went for a yearly membership for $60/year. 05-15-22  04:26am Replies (0) Review 215 The White Boxxx (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Used to be the finest glamcore site on the internet. -The models are selected to be attractive to extremely attractive. They are showcased in a luxurious setting that sets off their beauty, with clear, crisp videos, strong colors, white background that allows you to focus on the model and the sensous sex on display. -Videos have a definition from 240p through 1080p. That is both streaming and downloading. -Sometimes you get a popup ad with a timer that counts down the hours, minutes, seconds the ad is supposed to be active. Ads an element of urgency to joining the site at the reduced price (sarcasm). Cons: -Due to the covid epidemic, the update rate for the site (and the entire network) has slowed. Over the last year, the site has added about 4.5 new scenes per month. The network update rate is very slow. Maybe 10 new videos per month for the network. Most sites in the network stopped updating years ago. LetsDoeIt network has 18 different sites. Only 4 sites are still updating. -They slapped a limit of 100 videos per month downloads for the network. Not just per site, but for the entire network. -Photosets contain from 6 to 10 photos per set. Hardly worth collecting, even though the models range from attractive to lovely, because you get so few photos for each scene. -There is no 4K option, even though many porn sites have offered 4K since 2015 or 2016. Which seems strange for a glamour-oriented site. Bottom Line: The site has 376 scenes. Each scene has a video and a photoset. Because the photosets are so tiny, 10 photos or less per set, they are not worth collecting. Because of the slow update rate (averaging 4.5 new scenes per month, for the site, about 10 new scenes per month for the network), I can't recommend a membership beyond 1 or 2 months. And the limit of 100 videos per month for the network is also a negative. Not offering 4K videos seems strange, especially for a glamour site. Many people want a 4K option, to view it on a big screen. At one time I thought the network was a fine join. No longer. Not since the slower update rate, the fact that only 4 sites are still updating. And the 100 video limit reduces the value still further. Even though The White Boxx still produces some visually stunning erotic glamour videos, with models that look gorgeous, there are other sites that give you more quantity, with no download limits, and the quality of the competing sites can come close to what The White Boxxx offers. The Wow network, for a reduced price of $70/year, if you catch one of their discounts, is a fine alternative. You wouldn't normally think the Wow network is high quality porn, but take a look at the videos and photosets they've offered in the last few years. Wow network has moved from a medium quality network to a high quality network on their content. Both videos and photosets. With no download limits. With good update rates. Wow doesn't go for glamour as such, but the videos are clear, crisp, with wonderful colors, and the girls range from cute to lovely. 04-06-22  05:08pm Replies (0) Review 216 The White Boxxx (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: Note: although I think this site in one of the finest glamcore sites in the internet, the network has been hard hit by the covid epidemic. The network update rate has been slowed to around 10 new scenes per month. You're wasting your money if you buy a membership longer than 1 or 2 months here. PROS(START OF): -The main pro is this is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet. -Site has 320 scenes. They are refreshing the site with new content. -The content is exclusive. Aside from tube sites (and torrent sites), which seem to copy almost all porn sites, I've never seen any scenes from this site. I don't use torrent sites, but I do look at PornHub to see new models and find sites I might want to join. -The selection of models is among the finest of the internet. They also appear at the Wow network, Metart network, X-Art and other fine sites, but when appearing at The White Boxxx, their scenes are like glamorous, erotic movies. A short list of some of the models featured: Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): Cherry Kiss, Jia Lissa, Lena Reif, Lika Star, Liya Silver, Lya Missy, Oxana Chic, Sabrisse, the list of attractive models goes on and on. And the site presents them as lovely as any movie star. -You can sort the movie listing by newest movies, most popular, most viewed, runtime. -Movies have a trailer, and a short text description, as well as tags. -You can stream and/or download videos in your choice of 240p through 1080p. -There is no download limit for photosets. But the photosets are tiny, 10-14 photos per set. -PU has a discounted price of $14.95/month. Or a yearly price of $130. But I paid $80/year. Maybe I got a holiday discount? -There is a link on each video to skip the intro section, which is useful, after you've wasted time watching the same intro again and again. -You can switch the language the site/network displays. Site can display in Deutsch, English, Espanol, Francais, Italiano, and more. CONS(START OF): -The cons are basically minor. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): This is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet. I say the cons are basically minor, because I'm so impressed with how lovely these models are. If the models weren't so fucking gorgeous, the cons would irritate me more. -Irregular update rate. You get one new update per week, approximately. Many sites have taken to reposting older content shot years ago, but this site is still putting out new content. -You have a download limit of 100 videos per month. This is your limit for the entire network, not just for a single site in the network. Which means, you will probably need to stay a member for at least two months, to get all the videos you want to collect. -The photosets are limited to around 10 to 14 photos per set. That is a damn shame, since many of these models are absolutely gorgeous, or at least presented at their finest, and these models deserve a full set of at least 100+ photos per set. -There is a splash page of ads, and ads on every member page. -I wish there was a model listing for each site. Instead, you have a model text listing for the entire network. And it's cumbersome to click through the pages of the thumbnail listing of the scenes, looking for the models/scenes you want to view. -No 4K scenes. Which is surprising for a glamour site. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -Why do I call this the finest glamcore site on the internet? They make it an art form to present attractive models in the best light possible. They start with girls who are naturally attractive, then use makeup, wonderful lighting, expensive sets to showcase how lovely these models can be. The girls are doing hardcore porn, so you would normally expect a gritty aspect to the scenes: but not here. It's like these girls are beautiful angels who came down to earth to show men (and sometimes other women) the heavenly delights of sex: heaven is not a sterile place where everyone spends their time singing the praises of the Lord, but a place where, if you are lucky enough to go up instead of down, you can taste the pleasures of heavenly sex. And that's why they are singing: to proclaim the incredible joy of fucking these women. But if you're gay, there's probably a section in heaven for gay men. And for all the other varieties of gender that are clamoring to be heard. The first video I saw at The White Boxxx was a video of Lena Reif. Let me quote from a review I did on 07-18-19: "Watching Lena Reif's breasts sway as she moves is watching poetry in motion, in the video titled "Her First Threesome", where Lena Reif and Shona River give stunt cock Lutro a ride to remember. That was the first video I watched at the site, and that video alone, is worth the membership price to the network." I stand by that statement. That one video, by itself, is worth the membership price to the network. I've seen other videos of Lena Reif, at other sites. She's been featured at the Wow network, Metart network, Adult Time, Vixen network, etc. But at The White Boxxx, in this video, she's like an angel come to earth. Absolutely gorgeous. It's like the difference between file mignon and low-grade hamburger. She might be attractive at other sites, in other photosets or videos, but in this one video, she is fucking gorgeous. Bottom line summary: The main draw of the site is the care they take to present the attractive models as gorgeously as possible. I mean these are hardcore scenes, and yet the models are fucking lovely. The sex is mainly slow and sensual, but the scene lighting, the sets, the makeup, the expert camera-work that focuses on the lovely bodies of these models, just add up to one of the finest glamcore sites on the internet. I'm not saying the site is perfect. One PU member complained that he was having internet connection problems, couldn't download videos. And he reported that site support was slow to correct the problem. I've used site support, and had no problem reaching them through email. Email is slower than telephone or live chat, but that's all there is for support. I've only used support a couple of times. I had to wait a few days for a response, but any problems I had were resolved. But if I had a slow internet connection, and couldn't stream or download what I wanted, that would be a deal breaker and I would cancel my sub. But, thankfully, I've never had a real problem at the network that wasn't resolved fairly soon. So I'm giving the site (with network access) a score of 90. The girls are presented as gorgeous creatures. The sex is slow and sensual. I've seen a few scenes at other sites where the sex could be hotter: Pure Taboo, Teen Fidelity, Rocco Siffredi. But for glamcore sites, where the models are presented as gorgeous creatures, The White Boxxx is the finest site I've seen. If they increased the update rate for the network, once the covid epidemic is past, I would increase the score. 03-24-21  11:41pm Replies (0) Review 217 The White Boxxx (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -One of the finest glamcore sites in the internet. The site makes an artform of presenting attractive models in appealing erotic visions. When an attractive model appears in a The White Boxxx video, she will almost certainly look far more attractive than when she appears at any other porn site, including competing glamcore sites. It's a result of good-looking models, lighting, make-up, camera-work, etc., but these models are a vision of loveliness (in spite of the hardcore nature of the videos). Watching Lena Reif's breasts sway as she moves is watching poetry in motion, in the video titled "Her First Threesome", where Lena Reif and Shona River give stunt cock Lutro a ride to remember. That was the first video I watched at the site, and that video alone, is worth the membership price to the network. -The network mainly features attractive European models, but there are American models as well. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -There is a hot link at the start of each video that allows you to skip the intro part (that is basically an advertisement for the site). -I recommend watching the videos on a large screen monitor, instead of your laptop: (On a laptop, you might start drooling over the models and get drool over the keyboard or monitor. These models are that gorgeous). -Login and member pages are secure: https. -Download choices: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -Streaming choices: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. -PU offers a first month discount of $19.95. CONS(START OF): -Cons are basically minor. -The White Box videos present attractive models at their most attractive. The videos are a visual feast, probably the best glamcore internet site available. -The network dropped the number of sites you have access to: until recently, you had access to over 40 sites. But currently you only get 17 sites. The sites they dropped now require additional fees to access. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Although watching these gorgeous models making sensuous love is great, sometimes you wish for a harder edge, to take you over the top. The network has a site for rough sex, called Her Limit, but that is for fans of brutal fucking that is the polar opposite of glamcore. -There is a download limit of 100 movies per month. I don't download very much, so I've never encountered a download limit at the site or network. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): There are plenty of glamcore sites on the internet. But I think The White Boxxx is probably the finest of them. The site features lovely models in sensuous videos with high production values: the sets and lighting are expensive and the models are drop-dead gorgeous. The sex is basically sensuous lovemaking. It can be a straight couple, a lesbian couple, 2 girls and a guy. The sex is heartcore, not raunchy. Filmed with high production values. Watching a video is the same as watching a commercial-grade film that focuses on sex with a beautiful woman. X-Art, years ago, started making some excellent sensual videos of lovely women, but the quality of the videos at X-Art, in recent years, seems to have dropped off: maybe it's a lack of creative vision, or they are going for a harder edge. But The White Boxxx took the idea a sensuous glamcore sex and made it an artform. There is a slow buildup, with stroking, kissing, pleasuring their partners. There are currently 210 HD glamour porn videos at the site. The site updates, but I can't find a posting date for any of the videos, so I don't know how often the updates come. But since you also get access to the other 16 sites in the network, there is more than enough quality material to keep you busy for more than a month's membership. My favorte sites in the network include: The White Boxxx, Bitches Abroad, A Girl Knows, Xchimera. Giving the site and network access a score of 92. If more of the sites updated frequently, the score would be even higher. But for high-quality glamcore, The White Boxxx is the best site available. 07-18-19  09:32am Replies (3) Review 218 TMW VR Net (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -$14.95/month discount offered by PU. -TmwVRnet is part of the TMW (Teen Mega World) network. With membership in any one of the sites, you get acccess to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for. -The TmwVRnet has 7 or 8 updates per month. That is the most updates, by far, of any actively updating site in the network. By update, I mean both a video and the accompanying photoset of the shoot. -They upgraded the search engine for the site (and network). Now, when you put in a model's name in the search box, it returns her content at the network. Before, the search results were a jumbled mess, returning the model's content plus a slew of un-related content that had nothing to do with the model. So the search function is very useful now. -There is an excellent alphabetical listing of the models. With nice-sized thumbnails of the models that give you a clear picture of what the models look like. However, you have around 1,500 models at the network, Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): so searching through the model index would take a huge amount of time and patience. The model list is for the network. There is no model listing for each separate site. -The models are late teens through the early 20s. Mainly white, Eastern European girls. Most speak Russian or some Eastern European language. Most of the models range from cute or attractive to very attractive. -The posting date of the videos and photosets are displayed, so you know when the video and photoset was added. -Navigation is simple. Both for the site and network. Can easily change between sites, without having to re-login. The model's page lists her contents at the entire network, not just for a single site. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. A nice feature, when many sites are starting to charge extra for downloads, or limiting the amount of downloads. -The network offers up to 5K (2700p) videos -Zip for each photoset. But they are not worth collecting, because the quality is poor. Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): First, the photos are screencaps, and I've seen much better screen caps made from software at other porn sites. I'd guess that's partially because they were shooting for a VR video, and the software couldn't compensate for the difference from a normal film shoot. But also, the software they are using to create the photosets is not as good as the software some other porn sites are using to create photosets, because the photosets from other sites in the network is below the quality of photosets at some competing networks, especially the Wow sites. And far below the quality of the photosets at X-Art, which are probably photographs, not screen shots. CONS(START OF): -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -The photosets are screenshots made from some software program. The screenshots are just OK, better than the screenshots from years ago which were low-quality screenshots that were easy to recognize as screen shots. The screen shots for the last several years are better quality, but nowhere near a phtographic quality of even the lowest quality photos at photo sites like MetArt or MPL Studios. -Although the models mainly range from attractive to very attractive, there is not a wide range in age or body type or race: these are mainly white Eastern European girls of teens or early twenties. No milfs, very few Asians, Blacks or Latinos. -Minimal information about a model is given. A model's page lists her debut age (for her first content at the network.) And that's it--except for some made-up bullshit about the model. Playboy and Penthouse back in the 1970s and 1980s made up better sounding bullshit about their centerfold models that was more believable. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Number of videos: 398 Number of photosets: 398 (photoset is made of screencaps from the video). Number of photos per photoset: about 100 Video runtime: about 20-30 minutes. Download choices for a sample video at the TmwVRnet site: type of file approximate file size Oculus/Vive 3840x1920p 2.39 GB Gear VR 2880x1440p 1.2 GB PSVR 2880x1440p 1.03 GB Smartphone 1920x960p 1.2 GB MP4 1080p 588 MB 5K 5400x2700p 2.41 GB MP4 480p 166.69 MB For the network, on the videos posted for the last few years, I see downloads listed at 360p through 2160p (UHD). The network started offering 1080p videos in May 2014. Before that, the highest definition was 720p. Videos range from 360p through the highest definition. The network advertises that it offers 5K videos (2700p). But I haven't found the links that downloads 5K video definition. However, my computer equipment can only handle up to 1080p definition. Also, since I have limited drive storage space, I normally download videos in 720p, which saves me storage space and gives me good visuals on any videos I watch. TmwVRnet is the Virtual Reality site of the TMW network. I don't have Virtual Reality equipment, so I can't comment on the effectiveness of the VR effect. You can watch the videos without VR equipment, although there is a slight 3-D effect when watching a VR video at the site. Because the video was meant to be viewed as a VR video. Actually, since I don't have VR equipment, when watching these videos, I get eye-strain. Not only does the video have a strange 3-D effect, but I start to get a headache from watching these videos. So I'm not the primary target for these videos. And I can't speak for how effective the VR effects are. Unless you have VR equipment, I would guess the site has little appeal. I'm basing that on my reaction of eye-strain from watching a few of these VR videos (in non-VR format). Not only do these VR videos have a strange 3-D effect, but the videos give me a headache. TMW also has live chat shows. I'm not into chat, but there appear to be over 90 live chat shows on their chat channel, which you can watch for free, or tip if you want. I don't know how they can have so many different chat shows live at the same time. Out of the 90 live chat shows on the first page, you have: -Most live chats are single female models -3 chats are a single male model -2 chats are 2 male models -a few male-female model chats -even fewer with a female model with 2 or more guys -also a few with more than 1 female model and more than 1 guy CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW: 09-22-20  09:09am Replies (9) Review 219 Tricky Agent (0) 59.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Tricky Agent is the first porn site every young adult should join. It teaches you life lessons: how to seduce and fuck young women for free. Also, how to lie effectively. -Verotel is the default payment processor. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've found them reliable and helpful. -You get access to about 14 sites in the Dirty Flix network. None of the sites require a premium upgrade. -Content is exclusive. -No limits on streaming or downloads. Cons: -The listed price (even with a PU discount) is high: Monthly: $29.95 (recurring) 1 Year: $119.95 (non-recurring) However, during holiday specials, there are discounts: $59.95/year is the price I joined for. -The normal login and member pages are non-secure. But if you put "https:" in the address bar when logging in, you are secure. A tip that exotics4me gave me. -Login details are computer generated. A random selection of characters you have to write down to get access to the site. -There are ads on every page. Standard for porn sites. Don't be distracted by the ads. Go for the videos you already paid for. The ads are thumbnails of cute girls, that open a new page that invites you to join a different site. Sometimes you forget these thumbnails are ads, and click on them, hoping that will open a video at the site you're already logged into. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Tricky agent is an archive site. The last video was added on Jun 24, 2017. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): The previous video was added on Nov 11, 2016. So even when the site was active, updates were sporadic. -Small site. 57 videos. Each video has an accompanying photoset. The photosets average around 70-110 screencaps. The photosets are not worth collecting, because they are poor quality screencaps. -They mosaic the face of the stunt cock, to add an element of verisimilitude to the videos and screencaps. Which I find annoying. -When they film the stunt cock following and meeting the girl, the camera-work is jerky, they're shooting with a hand-held camera and the camera-man is an amateur who jiggles the camera as he walks to film the scene. The inside scenes are better, but still have the mosaic and lose focus a lot. -I don't know if it's the mosaic disguising the head of the stunt cock or that the video is not crisp and clear, but I actually get a headache from watching videos at this site. The focus, even on the inside scenes, is not crisp and clear. I can watch videos at most porn sites for hours. Watching the videos at Tricky Agent I can watch for a few minutes, then I start to get a headache and it's fucking not worth watching. -The videos are shot in Russia. There are English subtitles, so you can follow the dialog. Not a negative for me, since I enjoy reading subtitles. Other people might be annoyed by subtitles. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The site theme: A guy offers random girls the chance to do a test shoot to get into movies. The guy is a liar: he seduces the girls, or he has a partner who seduces the girls, but he has no ties to any legitimate movie company. The models are young teens. Mainly attractive. -In spite of the cute models at the site, I'm giving the site a score of 59. -This is an archive site. One video added in 2017. Before then, update rate was sporadic. -The sceensets are screen caps, and not worth collecting. -The videos, for me, are unwatchable. It might be the mosaic they use to disguise the stunt cock's face. Or it might be the jerky camera work, which is most evident when filming outside scenes, but also present for inside scenes. And the focus of even the inside scenes is not a crisp and clear film, but uneven. The mosaic to disguise the stunt cocks face can move to his shirt or hand or anywhere in the screen, so parts of the monitor are blurred momentarily and the focus turns to shit. That's what causing my headache. My eyes are trying to visualize the scene, which is out of focus, along with the blurred mosaic effect. The videos from a few years back are not as jerky as the more recent videos. My guess is that they used a better camera-man. Even in the earlier videos, you have problems with the focus of the film, so the image is not crisp and clear. I would much rather spend my time watching better quality videos. For me, the videos are not worth watching. The photosets are not worth viewing. There are sites in the network that are worth viewing. When I wrote: "Tricky Agent is the first porn site every young adult should join. It teaches you life lessons: how to seduce and fuck young women for free. Also, how to lie effectively." I hope you realize that I was being sarcastic. 04-04-22  05:18pm Replies (0) Review 220 Tricky Masseur (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -One of my favorite sites in the Teen Mega World network. -The girls are mainly attractive to fucking attractive. These are real teens or early twenties girls. -Unlimited streaming and downloads, as far as I can tell. I don't download a lot, so I rarely hit any download limits. -Videos are offered in 360p through 4Kp, for the last few years. Cons: -I think the cons are basically minor. -Not much effort is put into making the models attractive. But they are so young and attractive physically, to begin with, that you don't care: this is not glamour-style porn, but "reality" porn that is more real because the girls are young girls that are attractive to really attractive, without needing much make-up or fancy costumes to look good. -Although the videos were first posted at this site, they have also, later, been posted at many other sites. Specifically, many of the videos are also posted at the Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn). And all, or most of the site videos are also posted at the Rub A Teen site at the Team Skeet network. And there are also copies of many of these videos at other teen porn sites. -Very slow update rate. Maybe 1 new video every 2 or 3 or 4 months. -Captcha is often required to login to the site. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -The early photosets are poor quality screencaps of the video. Better lighting and better color control of the photos (I'm calling them photos, but they are really screencaps, in my estimation) would have been nice. Because a good quality photoset would really have been worth collecting. Over time, the quality of the screencaps did improve slightly, but the site and network focus much more on the video side of production. Which is a shame, because many of these girls really deserve a better copy of their work. -Models are Eastern European (mainly from Russia and surrounding areas). Almost all white. Slender young teens. Not a lot of diversity in race or body type. Not a con for me. -Videos are in Russian. Very few videos have subtitles in English. But you can ignore what they are saying with minimal impact. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site currently has 247 videos. Plus 247 matching photosets. Photosets contains around 81 to 215 photos. The basic plot is a young girl comes into a room for a massage. The masseur rubs her down, she gets hot from the sensuous massage, and they fuck. Sounds simple, and it is simple, but there are reasons this is a wonderful plot for porn: It makes very little demands on the acting ability of the girl and the stunt cock. Which is great, since most girls in porn, and the stunt cock, have very little acting ability. It makes for a clean set. So you don't have to worry about cheap sets. And the scene is easily videotaped, since the action happens in a single room, where the actors don't move around a lot, so it should be easy to be filmed, with little attention paid to lighting or sound control or focus. Also, the plot avoids the stupid parody style of many teen porn sites. The plot takes less suspension of disbelief than the stupid plots of two brainless teens having sex, which I find annoying. If you've been a member of the Diesel network or the Team Skeet network, many of the videos at Tricky Masseur will be familiar. Which would be disappointing. Except that the videos were first posted at Tricky Masseur, then posted at the Diesel network, and then posted at the Team Skeet network. I can't emphasize enough how attractive these girls are. They aren't made up to look like glamourous models, but they are so young and physically attractive to begin with, and the videos are so watchable, that I think this site is one of the better hardcore teen sites on the internet. The Diesel network videos have great looking models, and the production standard at that network are, on average, slightly better than the Teen Mega World videos, but Teen Mega World and Diesel network are two of my favorite teen hardcore networks. I'm giving Tricky Masseur site a score of 93. That's in spite of the slow update rate. You have 247 videos at the site, which gives you over 100 hours of video runtime. Plus, you have access to the rest of the Teen Mega World network, which has 36 sites, covering a wide variety of niches. 05-10-23  08:59am Replies (0) Review 221 Tricky Masseur (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Tricky Masseur is part of the Teen Mega World network (TMW). Joining any one of the sites gives you access to all network sites. There are no premium sites that you have to pay extra for. -TMW network has over 30 sites in the network. This is a teen network, with real teens as models. The sites cover many porn niches: boy-girl, boy-2 girls, creampie, lesbian, solo female masturbation, toys, virtual reality, high definition videos, etc. -The network did a recent update which made search and navigation much easier. A few years ago they did a network update that limited the search to the site you joined through. So if you joined any site except for the main TMW site, your search was limited to your join site: meaning, you could not find the content of a model at the network (except at your join site), and even if you spent the time using other methods to find the model's content at the network, to access that content was time-consuming. PROS CONTINUED BELOW: Cons: PROS-CONTINUED: You would have to log in to each site her content was at, and then page through the video listing pages to find her content at that site. The latest network update made the search at each site cover the entire network: Also, the search brings up hot links to the model's content, so you don't have to log in separately to each site to access her content. -PU discount of $14.95/month. Listed price is $29.95/month. -Unlimited streaming. -Unlimited downloading. -You can log in to any site in the network with the same log in details. -They started offering Ultra High Definition 4K videos on some sites in 2016. CONS(START OF): -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Site has slow, irregular updates. You get one new video in 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 months. However, the network updates with one new video every 1 or 2 days. The network advertises daily updates, but that was true years ago, and the recent updates are one update every 1 or 2 days. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Note: a lot of sites (not just the TMW sites) advertise daily updates, but the advertising is false. I'm not taking off points for false advertising for TMW, because they used to have daily updates. -Vendo is the billing agent. CCBill and Epoch are easy to cancel, but I've used Vendo many times over the years, and never had a problem with them. -Login and member pages are non-secure (not https). Many porn sites are switching to https, so TMW should do this as well. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The TMW network has over 30 sites, covering many teen niches. The network has over 5,000 videos. The network has over 2,000 models. The models range from attractive to very attractive. That is one of the main strengths of the network: the selection of cute to lovely teen models. The models are real teens, naturally attractive: very few implants. Some tattoos, but that's standard for porn models nowadays (and even regular people are getting inked, and not just teens, but older people as well). The TMW network is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks. My other favorite teen hardcore network would be what used to be called the Diesel Access network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn). But they dropped the name of Diesel Access network. Currently, if you join any one of the 3 sites, you get access to all 3 sites, but as far as I can tell, there is no name for the 3 sites as a network. The main reason those are my two favorite teen hardcore networks is because of the level of attractiveness of the models: The (former) Diesel Access network has put more effort into presenting the models attractively, but these girls are young and naturally attractive. Also, whether it's an act or whatever, the girls at TMW and Diesel Access seem to enjoy showing off, and enjoy sex, whether it's by themselves (masturbation), with another girl or more than 2 girls, or with a boy or more than one boy. There are some problems with the Tricky Masseur site. The slow update rate. For the last year or more, you might get one update in 2, 3, 4, or 5 months. Also, I'm a big fan of the massage theme in porn: it just seems to have a slightly more realistic approach to sex. I'm not saying the girls aren't following a script, but the script is easy to follow, and makes more sense than many of the stupid plots that porn sites often use. However, one problem is that many teen sites use the same videos that Tricky Masseur uses. Tricky Masseur posted them first, but if you've been a member of Diesel Access network, you've probably seen many of the Tricky Masseur videos. The Rub A Teen site, part of the Team Skeet network, is basically a clone of Tricky Masseur. I haven't been a member of Team Skeet for a couple of years now, but the Rub A Teen site had almost all of the Tricky Masseur videos at that time. When I say Rub A Teen is basically a clone of Tricky Masseur, it's because the Rub A Teen site had the Tricky Masseur videos, but no other videos. I'm assuming that's legal, because, this is guesswork on my part, TMW bought a non-exclusive license for those videos, and Team Skeet did the same. And Diesel Access did the same, except that Diesel Access did not make a separate massage site for the Tricky Masseur videos, but just threw them into their sites on a random basis. You can also find some of the Tricky Masseur videos at other porn sites. Bottom line: I'm giving the Tricky Masseur site a score of 90. The biggest con is the slow update rate. If you've been a member of the Rub A Teen site, you will have seen most or all of the Tricky Masseur videos. You might also have seen a lot of them if you were a member of the Diesel Access network. But some of the models at Tricky Masseur, and at TMW network, are just attractive to fucking lovely. And some of the videos can be hot. The membership price for TMW (and its satellite sites) keeps rising. It used to be $90/year, for many years, but now it's $119.40/year, even with a PU discount. I would suggest waiting for a holiday discount price, except I don't remember seeing a discounted price to TMW recently. But there are plenty of other good sites that have discounted prices for holiday specials. 08-12-19  10:30pm Replies (0) Review 222 Tricky Old Teacher (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the 1 Pass For All Sites network. Membership in any one site gives you access to all the sites. -30 sites in the network, covering a wide variety of niches. The main theme is teens. -Unlimited streaming -Unlimited downloads -Video definition offered in 360p through 2160p. -The site has 255 videos. Plus matching photosets. Cons: -Slow update rate. Site averages less than 1 new video per month. -Slow, irregular update rate for the network: anywhere from 0 to 5 new videos per month. -The "Recent Updates" page has posted dates for the videos, but there is no posting date for most of the videos or photosets in the members area. -Most of the sites in the network are not updating. -Most of the models speak Russian. But after watching Russian porn for many years, I've learned that "Aaaahhh", "Uhhhhhh", and other moans and groans sound alike in Russian, English, German and Spanish. The Japanese sex moans and groans are different: they sound like the girls are crying, which takes getting used to. Bottom Line: The site theme is teachers fucking their young students. The main attraction of the site and network is the level of attractiveness of the models. Models are teens or in their twenties. If you're into teen porn models, you've seen many of these girls at other teen sites, such as Lets Doe It, Joymii, Metart network, Teen Mega World network, Nubiles, Wow network. I mean, these girls are showcased all over the internet at teen sites. They are attractive to lovely, and they are worth watching in action. The action is mainly one girl with an older man, or sometimes two girls with an older man. The older man can be anywhere from his thirties to early fifties. Not a lot of real older grandpa types. The guys are supposed to be teachers or tutors, so it makes sense that they aren't the real older guys found on some old/young sites. The main reason the girls are cute is because of their youth. But they are also chosen because they are naturally attractive. Firm, tight bodies, the smile of enjoying life before they've been beaten down by disappointments. The plots are minimal. The girls are supposedly horny, and start groping their tutor/teacher on the slightest excuse. Or the tutor whips out his cock because he wants to get his rocks off. I mean, these are Russian stunt cocks, and they know the girls are eager to suck cock or get their pussies fucked (Russian porn models are not only cute, they've bypasssed fake shyness and are willing and eager to have sex). So this isn't glamcore, but straight hardcore teen/older man sex. I've read that many movie stars became actors because they were shy as children. And even when these actors become world famous, they are still shy in their private lives. Maybe that's the reason Russian teens go into porn: to overcome their fears of sex. On camera, Russian teens can put on a great show. And even if most of them aren't great actors, with a minimal plot, there's very little acting required, beyond moaning and groaning to show how excited they are when getting fucked. Which is good, because that eliminates the need for the porn writer to think up meaningful plots. The basic premise is: you have a teen girl, who is supposed to be studying with a tutor: And then, after a few minutes, BAM, the girl is sucking his cock, or getting screwed. The cuteness of the models, their enthusiasm for sex, obviates the need for plot. And the older guys are lucky to be able to fuck these cuties and get paid for it. I'm giving the site a score of 93. You get a large site (255 videos and matching photosets), plus access to about 30 other teen-oriented sites. There are 5 sites featuring old/young in the network, with other sites featuring virgin sex, anal sex, lesbian, cocksucking, baby sitters, etc. The main draw of the site and the network is the level of attractiveness of the teen models. Navigation is basically simple. I wish the content had posting dates, because it would be nice to see if the model is still active, or if the content was filmed years ago. But if you're into teen porn, this site will give you plenty of teen starlets. If you enjoy the old/young niche, you get 5 sites. And if you don't like old/young, you still get maybe 10,000 other teen videos in 25 other sites. 12-24-21  04:40am Replies (0) Review 223 Ultra Films (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -I want to thank PU member Avory for pointing out that Ultra Films/All Fine Girls/Wow Girls/Wow Porn often offers a special discounted membership of $70/year for access to all 4 sites. I was paying a much higher price to access those sites, until I found a similar offer. If you join a site, quite often they will charge you higher prices (or the same price as when you joined, instead of giving you the lower prices they offer to newer members). -For about the last 2 years, if you join any one of the following 4 sites, you get access to all 4 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films. -I was paying over $100 for access to the three sites, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn. Plus, I was paying for a separate membership to Ultra Films. So I consider $70/year for access to all 4 sites a bargain, especially since the 4 sites are top teen porn sites in the internet. -The main attraction of the sites is the catalog of models: Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): these girls (late teens, early 20s), range from cute or attractive to lovely. You don't get better than these girls. Some sites (like X-Art, or MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios or other fine porn sites) do have an amazing catalog of lovely models, but none of them outshine the models at the Wow network + Ultra Films. -The quality of the videos and photosets at the 4 sites is top of the line: mainly crystal clear images of these lovely girls. In living color. Well lighted. Good sound control. -So you can drool over these images in the privacy of your own home (or apartment, or wherever you wish. Except not on the bus or train or at work. These are images to be savored in private). -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -Photosets offered in 1000px, 2000px, 4000px, and original definition, for both streaming and download. -The online streaming mechanism to view photosets is fast and easy to use. -Videos offered in 720p, 1080p, 4K. Newer videos have a 6K option. Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): My equipment goes to 1080p, so I cry at night at the people who have finer, more expensive equipment than I can afford. -Navigation is easy. CONS(START OF): -Cons are basically minor. -They require separate login details for the Ultra Film site that is different from the login details you use to access the other 3 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn. Technically, you are not a member of each of the 4 sites: you are only a member of one of the 4 sites, with access to the other 3 sites. -Customer service can be slow to respond. I've asked some questions of customer service, and never got a reply to some questions. And other PU members have also complained about customer service problems. But that happens with many porn sites. -The network used to have a forum where they would announce news of the network, and allow members to post comments and questions. They eliminated the forum years ago. A shame. I guess they didn't want to spend time maintaining the forum. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -This review is supposed to be on the Ultra Films site. But in my mind, I can't really distinguish between the 4 sites I've mentioned: all 4 sites are basically the same: the models are used at all 4 sites, the style of the shoots for videos and photosets is similar, the content is similar. They are marketed as 4 separates sites, but that is to increase revenue, not for artistic reasons. Years ago, the owners/operators of the sites would sometimes post a video of a shoot in Wow Girls, and post the photoshoot of the same video in Wow Porn, and vice versa. They didn't try to create sites with different styles of content or different themes: the idea of creating different sites was to generate more money. Basically, Ultra Films, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls and Wow Porn are 4 sites with the same style of content, that use the same models, the same staff (phographers, videographers) to shoot the content. If you're into hardcore teen porn, any one of these sites, or especially all 4 sites, are like teen heaven: you won't find more attractive models anywhere. You should be able to find a low membership price of $70/year, which is offered throughout the year, for the last couple of years now. What is the content: Solo girls. Mainly masturbation. Some masturbation with toys. Girl/girl sex. Multiple girls having sex with each other. Boy/girl sex. 2 guys on one girl. A guy on 2 girls. They mix it up. But the girls are almost uniformly attractive. And they seem to be enjoying themselves. The sex is not over the top. Not extreme. Not rough. Just good clean fun. These photosets and videos are a pleasure to watch. Much more interesting and erotic than what you can find at MetArt or Hegre (my personal opinion, I realize). You look at a photoset of Amanda Dee, titled "Make Me Want You", posted 24 Mar 2022. This is a solo girl photoset. The model is a slender white girl, around 20 years old, black or brown hair, cute, attractive, smiles a lot, small breasts, just a pleasure to look at. No toys in the photoset. In some scenes, she can come across as the young girl next door. Not as a porn star. And her interview, posted Mar 07, 2022, is unusual, in that she talks extensively about her personal life: how she spends time dancing, cooking, what she's studying at university, how she spends time with her boyfriend, she just comes across as a simple, normal young girl, not a porn star, just a cute young girl trying to make a meaningful and happy life for herself and her boyfriend and her parents. The model named Amanda Dee at the Wow sites is named Amanda Fine at Metart, MetartX, and Sexart. I don't know why, but I find the Amanda photosets more erotic at Wow network than I do at the Metart network sites. I can't explain with details. It's the same girl, more or less similar poses, but the colors are better at the Wow Girls site, there's more variety between each succeeding photo in the set, the overall effect is just stronger, better at the Wow Girls set versus any of the sets at the Metart network. What I'm saying is: you look at the set at Wow Girls, and you respond to it. You look at the set at Metart (or Metartx or Sexart), and there's less response in you. The model is not as attractive. She's not as pleasing. So even though Metart is famed as a one of the finest softcore sites on the internet, their photosets, even with lovely or beautiful models, can lack impact. Which can start to become boring. And for different reasons, the Wow network photosets are more valuable: the can have greater impact, hold your interest better, than what you find at Hegre or the Metart sites. Which doesn't make a lot of sense, until you yourself study the photosets at Metart and at the Wow network, and see which you prefer. Bottom line: I think Ultra Films (with the other 3 sites) is a no-brainer join for $70/year. If you're into hardcore teen porn. And it's worth joining, if you're into softcore teen porn. 03-24-22  11:05am Replies (14) Review 224 Ultra Films (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -I want to thank PU member Avory for pointing out a special discount that was being offered. For $70, you got access to the 3 sites of the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), plus access to Ultra Films. That access includes unlimited streaming and downloading. I was paying more than that for access to the 3 Wow network sites. And now, not only did I get a lower price, but I also got Ultra Films access thrown in for free. -Site features videos with the following options: 720p, 1080p, 2160p (2160p is UHD). Unlimited streaming, unlimited downloading for videos and photosets. -The content is exclusive. -There is a photoset for each video, with 60 to 75 photos per set. The photos are real photos, not screencaps, clear, crisp images, nicely focused, of these lovely young models. The photosets are definitely worth collecting. -You can view the photos online, in their photo player. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -You can download each photoset in your choice of 4 definitions: 1,000 px, 2,000 px, 4,000 px, and original, which is 4096 x 2160 px. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -Updates once daily, or every other day. CONS(START OF): -The cons are relatively minor. The Ultra Films site is a fine addition to the Wow network. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The password for Ultra Films site is computer generated, and it's different from the password for the Wow network sites. -This is a technical issue. You have a membership in one site in the Wow network. But you have access to all 4 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films). I don't know why the sites/network define the system that way, but that's the reply the support staff tells you if you ask why you don't have a membership in each separate site. Bottom Line: The current price is $90/year for access to all 4 sites in the network. But you might find a discounted offer of $70/year if you search. I signed up for the Wow Girls email list, and I got an email offer to join the 4 sites for $70 on 2021-03-16 (and have gotten that same offer every few months). Note: I'm calling the 4 sites a network. The company itself calls 3 of the sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) the Wow network, but has added free access to the Ultra Films site for the last 4 months. All Fine Girls and Wow Girls and Wow Porn used to be part of the Diesel network. Then they dropped the name of the Diesel network, except that joining any one of the 3 sites gave you access to all 3 sites. I'm simplifying, because the mechanics of access changed over time. At one time, if you joined All Fine Girls by itself, you would gain access to the other 2 sites if you remained a member of All Fine Girls for a certain period of time. Or, you could pay an upgrade fee and gain access to all 3 sites. There were other ways to gain access to all 3 sites, but that is only historical interest. The current situation is (for the last 4 months) is that if you join any one of the 4 sites, you gain access to all 4 sites. And if you sign up for the Wow email newsletter, you might find the offer of $70/year in your email inbox, every so often. The Ultra Films site features videos with most of the same models (late teens, early 20s white girls from Eastern Europe) that are seen at the Wow network. The girls range from attractive to lovely. They are among the finest collection of hardcore teen models on the internet, and although the site and network are not glamcore, these fresh, young beauties are lovely to watch. The sex action covers the basic themes of hardcore porn: solo masturbation, boy-girl, boy-2 girls, 2 boys 2 girls, girl-girl, 3 or more girls. You get blow jobs, vaginal sex, anal sex, lesbian sex. A smattering of toys, but the models prefer fingers and lips and tongues for solo and lesbian sex. What sets the site and the network apart is how lovely these teen models are: attractive to lovely young teens that are exploring their bodies, either solo, or with other teen girls, or with one or more boys thrown in. It's not glamcore or heartcore, because this is not romantic sex: it's just young girls who really enjoy getting off. And it's beautiful to watch. The videos and photos are clear, crisp images of these lovely teens who are putting on a show for you and seem to be really enjoying themselves. Joie de vivre. It's hardcore, but it's not smut. It's lovely teen girls who really seem to be enjoying themselves with sex. And with some boys who are lucky enough to join in the fun. -Ultra Films is a fine site. But the Wow network of 3 sites are even better sites, because the three sites have far more content, far more models. But to get all 4 sites for less than I was paying for Ultra Films by itself, and far less than I used to pay for the Wow network, seems like a bargain to me. The Wow network is one of the best teen hardcore networks on the internet. The models range from attractive to lovely young teens. The video quality is outstanding. The photographic quality is outstanding. The photosets are not glamcore style, but the images are clear, crisp photos of these young teens that are definitely worth collecting. The Wow network is definitely one of my favorite teen hardcore networks, and I've been a year-long member for several years. I'm giving the Ultra Films site a score of 95. The site is excellent. You get 3 other excellent sites thrown in. You get quality (the attractive young models, the fine quality of the videos and photos, the simplicity of the navigation. This is an excellent site and network for teen hardcore porn. For a price that is a bargain. 03-18-21  12:20am Replies (0) Review 225 Ultra Films (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -The models range from pretty to lovely. Mainly slim bodies, white, late teens to early twenties. -The quality of the videos and photo sets is high class. Excellent lighting, focus, sound control. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -Choice of definition for downloading and streaming, from 480p through 4K. -You can steam or download the entire video, or select the parts you want to play or download. -Most videos have an accompanying photo set, which can be downloaded in 1000px, 2000px, and 4000px. -Navigation is basic but simple. You can search by Updates, Films, Galleries, Models. Cons: -I believe the cons are minor. This is one of the better sites for quality teen porn. The reasons are shown in the pro section above: the lovely teen models, the technical quality of the videos and photo sets. -Vendo is the billing agent. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem. -The customer support can be poor. They require you to use a ticketing system, and you don't always get a response to your requests. That is the Ultra Film support system, which is called onetouchservice. The Vendo support is much better. Bottom Line: If you like the Wow Girls and Wow Porn or All Fine Girls sites, you should like the Ultra Films site as well. They use the same models, the same style of porn, which could be called glamcore, in that the content is more or less spontaneous sex. The sex is either solo masturbation, girl-girl, boy-girl, or threesomes or more between girls, girls with a guy, girls with two guys. Not a lot of romance or plot, just some kissing or fondling before they get down to the blowjobs and vaginal and anal intercourse or fingering and licking etc. I believe the site was started around 2017-06, when Ultra 4K videos were becoming popular on porn sites. Which is why they called the site Ultra Films, because the site features videos with definitions up to 4K. (Teen Mega World also started a site in 2015 called Beauty 4K which featured videos up to 4K definition. But for years, all the new videos at all the sites at Teen Mega World go up to 4K definition, so it's not the newest fad any more.) Having said that 4K is no longer the newest fad, some PU members really seem to enjoy the 4K experience. I don't have the equipment to enjoy or appreciate the 4K experience. Maybe it's my age (I'm over 70), or my eyesight, or the lack of high end equipment, but I can't tell or appreciate the increased value of videos that are above 720p. And if I download content (video or photo sets), the lower definition content takes far less storage space than the higher definition content. If I download a 4000px, 2000px and 1000px photo set of the same photo set, and watch the photos in a slide show with Windows Photo Viewer (a photo viewer software that comes with Windows 10 on some editions), I can't tell the difference visually between the different definition photos. However, if I use IrfanView software (another photo viewer software that is free), and expand a single photo, I can tell the difference in the definition of a single photo. But that is not the way I view these photos. I usually use a slide show player to view them. Or, I can stop the slide show, to view a single photo, but I don't usually expand the photo the examine it in blow-up mode. So, for me, downloading high definition videos and photos is mainly a waste of storage space. And 4K videos use up a lot of storage space fast. That's me. There seem to be enough PU members that appreciate 4K content that it's a significant factor in their enjoyment of a porn site. And the same for Virtual Reality sites. There are PU members who enjoy and subscribe to Virtual Reality porn sites. I don't have virtual reality equipment. So virtual reality sites don't interest me very much. Although the sites can also be viewed without virtual reality equipment. But mainly virtual reality porn is best skipped over if you don't have virtual reality equipment. Bottom line: The Ultra Films site is a quality offering from the people who run the Wow Girls\Wow Porn sites. You have the same lovely teen models, the same type of porn: spontaneous sex between young teens, filmed in clear, crisp images with solid colors, and excellent technical factors. How can they improve the site: If you join any one of the three sites (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls), you get immediate access to all 3 sites. Ultra Films is a separate site. If they added Ultra Films to the other 3 sites in a single membership, that would more content added for the same price. That would be great for the porn customer. But not so great for the porn producer, who is trying to increase revenues, by offering sites with different memberships. The newest offering from these people is LustWeek.com. Which uses the same models seen at the other sites (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls, Ultra Films) I've mentioned, in the same high quality porn. The LustWeek site focuses on a new model each week. And these models can be fucking lovely. I'm giving the Ultra Films site a score of 93. It's definitely worth checking out, if you are a fan of All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn. However, joining all of these worthwhile sites can get to be very expensive. 02-25-20  09:31am Replies (2) Shown : 201-225 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.34 seconds.