Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : LKLK (0)

Feedback:   All (518)  |   Reviews (162)  |   Comments (40)  |   Replies (316) Other:   Replies Received (290)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 176-200 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 176 Relaxxxed (0) 72.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Lets Doe It network, a mainly European glamcore network. The White Boxxx channel is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet, because of the care and techniques they use to make the attractive models as lovely as possible. -You get access to all the channels (15 channels total) with a membership in any one of the channels, or with a membership to the Lets Doe It network. There are no premium channels you have to pay extra for. -Unlimited streaming. -Relaxxxed channel has 130 videos. So it's one of the larger channels in the network. -Content is exclusive. Cons: -Archive channel. Last update was 2018-07-10. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -The first page you see when you login is a page of ads. This is a con and also a pro. Con, because who wants to see more ads, you paid for your membership, give me what I paid for, don't shove ads at me. Pro, because some of the ads have very low prices for some fine sites (as well as sites I have no interest in). So if I had lots of money (which I don't), the ads would be useful hints of what to join next. But I'm willing to browse the ads to see what's interesting--sort of like window shopping, where you browse the contents, even if you don't have much money to buy anything. -There is a download limit of 100 videos per month for the entire network. Not a problem for me for 2 reasons: 1. I have a year-long membership. 2. I rarely download a lot. If I have an active membership, it's just easier for me to view/stream the content online. Instead of searching through my computer. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -There is no limit on downloading photosets. But the photosets are tiny, only 10 or less photos per set, so they are not worth collecting, even when the girl is attractive, because the photos, although nice, are not extra-ordinary. I've seen a lot of photos that by themselves are so gorgeous (the girl model is photographed so well) that it's worth keeping those photos, but none of the photos I've seen at the Relaxxxed channel are that special or worth keeping. -In addition to the first page of ads that you have to click through to get to the member pages, there are ads at the bottom of each member page. But they are easy to ignore. -There is a zip file for each photoset. But it downloads in only one definition (you can't choose low, medium or high). But since the photosets are not worth keeping, that's no problem. -The photosets download with a generic file name of mixed alpha-numeric characters. So if you want to know what the file is, you have to rename it with model, title of set, etc. But again, not a problem, since the photosets are not worth downloading. -A minor irritation. To list all the channels at the Lets Doe It network, you have to click the "Load More Channels" link to add additional channels. Which is irritating, because to get to some channels, such as Relaxxxed, you have to go through the "Load More Channels" routine every time you are logged out. And my laptop logs me out of the network a lot. -I don't know if it's a server problem or my poor ISP connection, but I keep logging out of the site frequently, and have to re login. Not a major issue, but it's irritating. Again, don't know if the problem is with the site, or with my weak wifi connection that's causing the problem. -This is off topic. I use a laptop with the WiFi signal from Spectrum. The WiFi signal is weak. The WiFi speed averages about 15-20 Mbps on a 200 Mbps connection. I was charged about $90 this month, and about $48 the previous month, for going over my cellular data limit. I normally pay $35/month for my cell phone. I talked to Spectrum tech support, and the agent told me my cell phone was probably using cellular data instead of my WiFi, because I have a weak WiFi signal. This switching from WiFi to cellular data was done automatically by the phone, probably becasue the WiFi signal was weak. I went into the Spectrum office on Saturday, April 11, and the Spectrum agent changed the phone setup to use no cellular data. But just as a special warning, which might never apply to anyone: you have to check your bills. I am on automatic payments for my internet and cell phone usage. So I didn't realize what was happening until I checked my last bill, and saw I was charged $90 for cell phone data usage. That was a mistake. My cell phone data usage should be minimal: closer to zero than 1 GB, which is my monthly allowance. But computers and cell phones can be tricky, and you can run up charges you aren't aware of, until you get the bill. I shouldn't have been charged more than my $35 monthly payment, but because the cell phone was switching to cellular data from WiFi automatically, the bill was $90. So, check your bills. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site stats: Number of videos: 130. Archive site. Last update 2018-07-10. Video runtime: 20 - 30 minutes. You can stream or download videos in different definitions: 240p through 1080p. Photosets: 10 or less photos in a set. Only one definition, but not worth downloading. Download limit: 100 videos for the network per month. The channel Relaxxxed theme is girls who are relaxing (laying at a pool, getting a message, doing yoga). An attractive guy shows up and the girl becomes aroused, and they have sex. There are so many porn sites, and they are always looking for some new idea to make things interesting. But the idea for this channel is lame and poorly executed. There are many fine or good massage sites, and this could be one, instead of the short, senseless pre-buildup of a girl laying at a pool, or doing yoga. The massage theme can be done very easily: it doesn't require much acting on the part of the female model, so that's one of the reasons a massage video is easy to do well. The attractive level of the models at Relaxxxed is below average for the network. The girls at The White Boxxx are attractive to begin with, and they are presented as gorgeous glamcore models. The models are Relaxxxed are OK, but when you compare with The White Boxxx, are a real disappointment. Sorry to keep harping on this, but The White Boxxx is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet. The models are presented in glorious, living color. The relaxxxed channel does have some massage videos. They are nothing special. I much prefer the massage videos at Tricky Masseur or the Dane Jones massage videos because they are simpler, focus on arousing the girl through a massage and then fucking. CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW: 04-14-20  04:46am Replies (1) Review 177 Rocco Siffredi (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -I am writing the review based on the Adult Time channel for Rocco Siffredi. But I am also including some details on the original Rocco Siffredi site, and other sites that have channels in the Adult Time network. -If you join Adult Time, the Rocco Siffredi channel is included, along with over 100 additional channels of porn covering a wide variety of niches. -If you join the Rocco Siffredi site directly, you also get access to the Adult Time network. If you join the Rocco Siffredi site directly, you also get direct access to over 20 porn sites, in addition to the Adult Time channels. (I was a member of Devils Film directly in 2019, which gave me access to a large number of porn sites directly. Almost all of the porn sites are now included as channels in the Adult Time network: however, when a porn site is included as a channed in the Adult Time network, there are often differences between the Adult Time channel and the original site it's based on: Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -the number of videos in the Adult Time channel are often far less than the the video count at the original site. -The photo sets at the Adult Time channel have fewer photos than the original photo sets at the original site. -The search engine at Adult Time returns the content for a model from the entire Adult Time network. The search engine, at the original site returns content for a model from the site network, which is both positive and negative: it limits the content returned to the site network, so it's easier to search for the model's content at the network, filtering out much of the Adult Time network. I don't believe you can limit the search in an Adult Time network to a single channel: Instead, a search in the Adult Time network returns all the model's content at Adult Time. -The Rocco Siffredi channel has 2142 videos, which is a huge number of videos. Rocco featured A-list female porn stars for many years. CONS(START OF): -Pre-checked cross-sale on join pag Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -When you join many of the sites in the Gamma Entertainment network, you also gain access to the Adult Time network. However, not all sites in the Gamma Entertainment network clearly specify whether you will get complete access to the Adult Time network. That is a major negative, because I believe that access to the Adult Time network is the crown jewel of most memberships to a Gamma Entertainment site. -As previously noted, the search engine for Adult Time returns content from the entire Adult Time network. You can't filter the search to include only the results from a single channel. -Also, the search engine at the Adult Time network is flawed, because it only shows a part of the model's content, instead of clearly showing her entire content listed over several pages. -The photo sets at Rocco Siffredi channel are limited edition versions of the original photo sets. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -Rocco started in porn in the 1980s, and he is still performing in porn today. Rocco is called the Italian Stallion, because of his cult-like fame as one of the most recognizable male porn stars ever. -Some PU members have expressed disappointment with the Adult Time network: they feel it offers a degraded version of the porn sites that are cloned into channels of the Adult Time network. I feel that the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today, based on the following: -A huge backlog of high quality porn-high quality based on the technical factors of a porn video. -A wide variety of porn genres and niches. -Easy search for a model's content the Adult Time network. -A low membership price. Especially if you join during one of the holiday special price discounts. I'm giving the Rocco Siffredi channel a score of 93. That's because you get access not only to the Rocco Siffredi channel, but also get access to the excellent Adult Time network, which has over 100 channels covering a wide variety of niches, and a huge backlog of high quality hardcore porn videos and photo sets. Because of the huge amount of content at the Rocco Siffredi channel, and also the huge amount of content at the Adult Time network, searching through the channel and network can take a lot of time and effort to find what you're looking for. That is both good and bad. But there is so much quality hardcore porn, that the search is worth the effort, and the network is a definite bargain. 03-07-20  11:37pm Replies (2) Review 178 Scam Angels (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Scam Angels is a channed of Lets Doe It network. You get access to all the channels in the Lets Doe It network. There are no premium channels you have to pay extra for. -PU lists a discounted price of $24.95/month recurring. But if you do a search, you might find a lower price, especially during holidays, when many porn sites offer good discounts. -There is a "skip it" hot link that you can use to skip the intro part of a video, which is an ad for the channel's content. -You can stream or download the videos in your choice of definition: 240p - 1080p. (Note: there is a download limit of 100 videos per month for the network.) -The network and this channel put a lot of money into the videos: the locatins are expensive, the sets are expensive, the costumes are nice to expensive, the lighting and technical factors of the shoot are top-notch. The channel and the network are high-quality porn. -The network content is exclusive. But if you surf tube sites, there are condensed videos shown. Cons: -The channel is small. Only 50 videos. -Slow update rate. Two or three new videos per month. -Cross-sale on join page. Be sure to uncheck the box if you don't want the trial, which turns into a very expensive membership if allowed to run beyond the 2- or 3-day trial period. If you like the trial membership site, then you can easily find a cheaper membership price with a little internet searching. -Although the channel models are OK looking, the level of model attractiveness at some of the other network channels is far superior: especially at The White Boxxx, which is one of the finest glamcore hardcore channels on the internet. At The White Boxxx, they take attractive models and make them into erotic beauties of sex. -There is a network limit of 100 videos per month download. Not a big deal, unless you want to download the entire network in one month, or even the best network videos. There are over 100 videos at the network that are worth collecting. Some really fabulous models. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -The primary biller is Vendo. Which is not as well-known as CCBill or Epoch. But I've had many subs with Vendo, and never had a problem. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): From the channel: "Hot girls with gorgeous bodies and dazzling sex skills, join powers to create the ScamAngel squad. They are sensual but very dangerous girls... Their targets are rich guys or random horny men who have something they craving for, usually cash! These naughty hotties fuck their brains out, record them and, finally, blackmail them into giving up whatever these girls want. You must witness the wild, hot fuck fests and how quick their horny victims will pay up for the juicy content to remain out of the public eye!" - So the channel must have seen some Charlie's Angels movies, and instead of using girls as spies for hire, are using the girls as bait for hire. Also, the videos are hardcore sex, unlike the Charlie's Angels movies, which are PG-13, for violence, but no overt sex. Different audience, I guess (my idea of a joke. Ha-ha). The channel is listed as "reality porn". My guess is that if you think that Charlie's Angels and the James Bond movies are "reality shows", then Scam Angels could be considered "reality porn". But my take is that the channel would be more properly considered as plot-driven porn, with the proviso that modern porn (after the 1970s), is mainly two or more bodies slamming against each other, so if there is a set-up to the sex, then that qualifies at plot-driven porn. Actually, the Scam Angels channel does a nice job setting up the sex for blackmail idea, so it's like a hardcore version of the Charlie's Angel theme, subsituting sex for blackmail, instead of tease for spies. Video runtime averages just under 30 minutes, which gives the video enough time to include a plot leading up to the sex, and then the blackmail. Videos that run over 30 minutes, in my opinion, just seem to run on too long. The sex should be 10-20 minutes, no longer, or it gets repetitious, and loses its impact. Scam Angels is a nice addition to the Lets Doe It network. But my favorite channel in the network is The White Boxxx, which features attractive models in glamcore sex that is probably the finest hardcore glamcore sex on the internet (which I've said before, and keep repeating, because The White Boxxx just impresses me that much). Giving the Scam Angels a score of 85. That is very sujective. The value of the Lets Doe It network is in the 90s, because of the The White Boxxx channel (glamcore sex), and A Girl Knows channel (lesbian sex), and Bitches Abroad channel (tourist sex). 11-18-19  04:32pm Replies (0) Review 179 Sell Your GF (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -3,200+ videos for the network. -The network is still updating. -Free lifetime access for ex-members. After your membership expires, you can still see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in the member zone. -You can save your favorite videos, models and photosets. -Low annual membership price. I joined for $60/year. -The network has at least 9 sites you get access to. -Telephone live support is supposed to be 24/7. But I never used it, to try it out. -Unlimited streaming and downloading (at least, I never found any limits. However, I don't download a lot, so, based on my personal history, I wouldn't usually encounter any download limits if there were any.). -You can steam the videos in 240p, 720p, 1080p. -You can download the videos in 240p, 720p, 1080p, 4K. -The network updates with 3 to 5 new videos and matching photosets per week. Cons: -Login and member pages are not secure (no https). -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -There is a live sex cams channel. I'm not interested in live sex cams. And when I click on the channel, I get a notice, in Spanish, that: A problem has been detected with your account. You can contact live support if you have questions. (Why the notice is in Spanish I have no idea, since the rest of the network is in English.) -Your login details are computer generated, instead of allowing you to choose your own. -There is only 1 definition for the zip file for the photosets. But the photoset is mainly a screencap collection of the video. And hardly worth collecting. Even when the models are cute, the photoset is not worth collecting. Bottom Line: Site theme: A variation of kinky sex. From the site description: "They must be total perverts to sit there and watch their GFs get fucked for cash For some of these guys watching their girlfriends get banged by another man is a real turn-on while for others it's a painful pleasure Watch these hot amateur chicks get their brains fucked out by horny strangers right before their boyfriends' eyes" If you get off from watching a guy sell his girlfriend for some needed cash, and enjoy the guy's humiliation, or it turns you on as a voyeur to watch a girl having sex in front of her boyfriend, this site will scratch that itch. The vibe of the site: this is a home-movie collection of videos. They are not trying to make glamcore porn, but home-based porn, where you get the stunt cocks in cheap clothes, the models in cheap street clothes, a low-rent apartment where the sex takes place. The guy is selling his girlfriend for needed cash, and he watches some other guy having sex with his girlfriend. Not only is this home-based porn, but it's Russian home-based, low-rent porn, where the attitude is, "She my girlfriend, I'm making money off her pussy." So, not a lot of romance or glamour to the attitudes or settings or costumes or makeup to make the girls look attractive. The girls are young teens, mainly naturally attractive, but the sex is like a bologna sandwich where you grab two slices of bread, maybe swipe a bit of mayonnaise with a kife, slap in one or two slices of bologna, and start chomping away. This isn't even bread-and-butter porn. It's more like two slices of bread, slapped together, and eaten. No pickles, no mayonnaise, no mustard, no lettuce, maybe a slice of bologna, nothing else. So if you're tired of the normal glamcore porn, and want to go back to the good-old-days of low-rent porn, this site and network can fill that need. The only problem is that a lot of the teens are cute girls. And they deserve better treatment, to make their videos and photosets more enjoyable. If you want simple teen porn, with attractive teen models that are attractive yet presented simply without a lot of glamour, I recommend the Teen Mega World network, which has thousands of attractive teens, that are fucked in a variety of ways. In spite of the low membership price of this site and network, I would recommend looking for other sites to join. Note: I'm not a fan of the home-based porn style of shooting. I've seen videos from this network at tube sites (like PornHub and others), where those videos were attractive. That's why I joined this network, because the videos I saw from this network were attractive. The same videos, at the network, are far less attractive. I assume that either the tube sites, or the network, upgraded the sample videos. I just wish the network did the same upgrades on the videos at the network. Then, I would recommend the site and network as worth joining. Normally, you think that the quality of a video at the original network is higher quality than the version at a tube site. Site stats: Site videos: 269 Site updates with one new video and photoset per month. The network updates with 3 to 5 videos and photosets per week. Network stats: Network videos: 3,236 Network photos: 212,691 Network models: 2,254 Photosets: Average 50 photos per set, for the site and the network. The network started offering 4K videos in late 2016 for their newest videos. In February 2017, the network gave free access to expired members. From now on all expired members get free limited access to our website. You will be able to see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in your member zone. If your password stopped working you can reset it on login page or ask our support for help. I'm giving the site a score of 75. Even with network access and a low membership price, I would not recommend joining. Which is a shame. Because the network has a lot of cute teen models. However, maybe I'm being too hard. In all of the videos I watched at the site, the boyfriend stayed to watch the guy fucking the girl. Maybe he was checking to see if the buyer was getting his money's worth. Maybe the guy doing the selling wanted to make sure his girlfriend was enjoying the sex. Maybe the guy selling, and the guy buying, were true friends and the money was just a device where they could share the girl without telling the girl the two guys were really interested in each other, and the girl was just a beard used to hide the fact the two guys are gay? Questions like this could raise the score by a few points. A listing of the sites included in network access is included in the first reply to this review. As well as a few notes on the listing. 07-14-20  06:44am Replies (5) Review 180 Sex Art (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the MetArt network. So you can expect a professional, high class offering of erotic porn. -A large catalog of photo sets and videos. -Updates daily. Either a photo set or a video. -The main strength of the site is the level of the attractiveness of the models. Both the girls and the men are attractive. The women range in age from late teens to the twenties, and are either good-looking or beautiful. -Videos are offered from 220p to 4K (UHD), in download. -Photo sets are offered in high, medium and low definition zips. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. No limits, no extra charge for downloads. -PU has a discounted price of $19.99/month recurring. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale in join page. -The videos lack heat. Although this is glamorized hardcore sex, it's more like a softcore version. The site offers high-quality professional videos and photo sets, but the videos just lack heat. -The videos often have a setup of 10 minutes or less, before the sex starts. Since the video runtime is 30 minutes or less, that doesn't leave much time for the sex. Bottom Line: Site stats: Videos: over 1200 Photo sets: Over 1600 Number of photos per set: Over 100 The site theme is softcore erotic sex. I say softcore, because it's glamourized sex, not raunchy, but it would be considered hardcore. You have guy/girl, girl/girl, and solo female masturbation. -SexArt is like a glamorized, erotic version of MetArt. MetArt focuses on photos, although it also offers some videos, and the videos at MetArt are becoming slightly more erotic. But there is no sex in the MetArt videos. There is sex in the SexArt videos (and photo sets). -Although I think the videos lack heat, the photo sets are more erotic. Looking at Candy Kate, in her first photo set at SexArt, titled "First Time", posted Jun 04, 2020, she is a wet dream come true. It's a solo model set, but she is fucking gorgeous. Or maybe sexy is a better word, because I've seen prettier models, but none more luscious, more fuckable. Note: you are supposed to respect the models, but respect has nothing to do with it: Candy Kate is hot. At least in the Sex Art photo set titled "First Time". She has 2 photo sets at MetArt. The same model, professionally photographed in high-class glamour setting, but the set at SexArt is far more erotic. The site is easy to navigate. And the search feature is excellent for bringing up a model's content at the site. I can't describe what makes the photosets are SexArt more erotic than the photosets at MetArt. Maybe it's because I have seen thousands of photosets at MetArt, and I'm becoming slightly bored with that site. But the photosets are SexArt are just more enticing. More erotic. I have a hunger for the model at SexArt, while at MetArt, I think she is cute or attractive, but no hunger. Even though MetArt has thousands of really attractive, even beautiful or gorgeous women. I'm giving SexArt a score of 90. It has a fine catalog of outstanding women. But outstanding women are common: Femjoy, MPL Studios, MetArt, and a score of other fine photo sites have 1,000s of outstanding, lovely models. What could SexArt do better? They could put some heat into their videos. But their photo sets are really outstanding. 06-10-20  11:47am Replies (1) Review 181 Shadow Slaves (0) 81.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Prime network, a European network that has elements going back to before the internet existed. -Shadow Slaves is a BDSM site. -Some of the models are cute or attractive. Pixie and Crystel-Lei and Lyarah. But you get different body types: slender, as well as big models. Most slave masters are men, but you also have slave mistresses abusing a female slave. Cons: -Small site. Only 56 videos. -Since Adult Prime is a European network, they spell some words funny. Like arse, which means ass. Or bum, which is proper English for the part of the body that you sit on. -Watching these videos, you realize how expensive a BDSM hobby can become. You need lots of special equipment: all types of whips, different paddles, handcuffs and ropes and other restaints, clamps, balls to stick in your woman's mouth, special exercise equipment to hang your slave on the ceiling or off the floor. Maybe a cattle prod from Amazon or your local adult store for extra excitement. Other types of electric prods to make her squeal. Sparklers to stick in your slave's bum, while lit. Should be careful not to burn the slave by accident. You also need to buy special clothes that are easily ripped with your bare hands. No knives needed when ripping the clothes from your female slave. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Also need lots of clothes pins to hang from your slaves tits, and other body parts that might be sensitive. -Candles, to drip hot wax onto your slave's body parts. -A bic lighter, to re-light the candles that sometimes go out. -You can only stream or download the videos in 720p. Note: that is wrong. The website has text that shows the videos are available in 720p for streaming and downloads. But when you download a video, the actual definition might be 576p. -The file size for a video is huge. A 52 minute video at 576p definition, can be 1.93 GB. -Most videos offer a choice of 540p, 720p, 1080p for videos and photos. Other videos might only offer a 720p choice. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Using a quote from the Shadow Slaves website: "The Shadow Slaves website is actually a legend on the web. The owner is actually obsessive/compulsive about including the most recent BDSM as well as Fetish videos as well as photos he is able to lay the grubby of his little hands on. In case he cannot find the unpleasant BDSM scenes he requires for Shadow Slaves, he basically has the very own picture staff of his go out and make it for him! All genuine BDSM footage of real slavegirls in hardcore fetish movies, unique bondage punishments and extreme humiliation." I don't know how much actual pain the slaves are experiencing. The site seems to focus more on humiliation than actual torture. I believe there is mild pain, but not extreme pain. At some of the extreme sex sites I've seen, the women seem to experience more pain during the sex, than the Shadow Slaves site videos. On a personal level, I've experienced mild to severe pain, at hospitals for different conditions. If you experience severe pain, it's almost impossible to stop from screaming and/or crying. The models here are not screaming or crying. They are making noises that are supposed to show pain, but it's mild pain, mild noises. Yes, individuals have different levels of pain tolerance, but these women are being humiliated more than being tortured. There's one video, "Introducing Elise Graves", where the mistress is supposed to be treating the female slave roughly. And the slave is screaming loudly. But it's more theater than real. The mistress is kicking the slave in the buttocks, these are real kicks, but the buttocks is not a sensitive area of your body, so screaming loudly if you are kicked in the ass is theatrics, not experiencing real pain. If you enjoy BDSM, this site might offer some worthwhile content. The site focuses on humiliation, not severe torture. But there is mild pain suffered by the slaves, and the master or mistress gets some satisfaction by dominating the slaves. The site only has 56 videos. So I'm giving it a score of 81. 04-07-22  12:00pm Replies (0) Review 182 Shane Diesel XXX (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the New Sensations network. A fine network, with a discounted membership price of $60/year offered during holiday specials. The listed membership price is $120/year, but the normal PU discounted price is $95/year. -All sites in the network are available with a regular membership. No sites require a premium upgrade. -Unlimited streaming. -There is a daily download limit of 300 GB, which is generous. -Easy login, if you have cookies enabled. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -Videos are offered in 480p for the very earliest videos. Then they started offering 720p and 1080p definition. Most videos were offered in 2 or more bit rates. -There is a photoset associated with almost all videos. The photos are good quality, and many of the models are suprisingly attractive. So I can see why someone might collect the best of these photosets. Cons: -The biggest con is that the site stopped updating in 2017. It's an archive site. -Two pre-checked cross-sales on the join pages. But a cross-sale is standard for any porn site join page. -Ads on every member page. Again, standard for almost all porn sites. -PU lists the site as "Shane Diesel's Bangin Babes". But the New Sensations network, and the site itself, call the site "shanedieselxxx". Bottom Line: Shane DieselXXX features a large black man (Shane Diesel) banging white women. Interracial sex is a popular niche in porn. Shane Diesel is featured as the stunt cock in all the videos. There are 317 videos at the site. This is an archive site, stopped updating in 2017. The videos run around 28 to 40 minutes. You get a photoset of the video with around 100 photos per set. The individual photo in a set is 683x1024 pixels. I assume the individual photo is an actual photo, and not a screen cap: the photos are well lit, OK to good colors, nicely foucused and centered. It's not a glamour photoset, just a record of individual women getting fucked by Shane Diesel. I have no interest in collecting these photosets. But if you're a fan of Shane Diesel, you might want to collect them. The basic plot of most videos is Shane Diesel satisfying the basic urge of white women who want to fuck with a massive black cock. Shane Diesel is not a gangster, he knows he's the black man put on earth to let white women suck his dick, then ram that massive dick up their ass and pussy and drive them wild. Shane Diesel comes across as the self-confident stud we've all wanted to be. Shane Diesel is not as famous as Rocco Siffredi and Peter North, but his site does a fine job showcasing his talent. Shane Diesel comes across as a smart guy who built a career and a business in porn. You can actually purchase, on the internet, a 10 inch "replica of adult star Shane Diesel's cock and balls. Same feel! Same look! This huge ebony dildo is ready for you. Look and feels like Shane Diesel's cock. Firm, yet flexible design. Waterproof, non-vibrating dildo. Suction cup base for hands-free fun. Works with all lubes. Includes autographed photo of Shane Diesel. 100% phthalate free, safe for your body. Weighs 32.70 ounces. Shane Diesel Dildo from New Sensation Novelties NS Sex Toys. Made is the USA." I don't have any experience with dildos, but 32.70 ounces sounds like a lot of dildo. Watching a Shane Diesel video gives you a very different feeling from watching a Blacked.com or Blacked Raw video. Blacked.com and Blacked Raw are glamour style interracial porn, where one or more black men have sex with white women. The videos at those two sites are extremely high quality, in terms of the female talent, lighting, professional camera-work, settings, etc. The videos and photosets are of the highest glamcore quality you can find. Shane Diesel is not glamour, it's more like reality porn, where you get a Okay-looking black man fucking white women. Some of the videos have a cuckold element as well, where you get a wimpy white guy fawning over an attractive white woman, shane diesel shows up and gives the woman a few kisses, he whips out his cock, the woman is so turned on she starts sucking it, and the white guy runs off in tears. Or the woman says she has a boyfriend who doesn't really satisfy her, and Shane smirks and says he's the black bull who will do the job on her. You know you're not watching Shakespeare with these videos, but they are good quality porn: Nice sets, the models are mainly attractive white women in their 20s or 30s, and Shane Diesel is excellent as a stunt cock. I really appreciate the plots are not stupid or trying to be funny. I'm giving the site a score of 85. If the site started updating again, the score would be higher. The videos at ShaneDiesel don't have the glossy feel of Blacked.com videos, but they are definitely watchable. 06-23-22  10:23pm Replies (0) Review 183 She Is Nerdy (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -This is not a pro, but an important fact that should be noted: If you join the site (She Is Nerdy) directly, the price is $29.95/month, or $119.95/year. Joining through the Dirty Flix site (with a PU discount), the price is $15/month or $60/year, during holiday specials. I joined for $60/year (recurring) during a holiday special. These discounts are given many times throughout the year. Whether you join She Is Nerdy or Dirty Flix, you have access to the same sites. There are no sites in the network requiring a premium fee. -The site (and network) is teen oriented. There is a ton of cute young models (mainly from Russia and surrounding areas) at the network. -You get around 14 sites with a membership to the site or network. -Unlimited streaming and downloads, as far as I can tell. -Site updates with 3 or 4 new videos per month. -Videos are presented in low, medium and high definition. For the last few years they've offered a 4K definition. Cons: -There appears to be both an open and a secure login page for the site/network. If you open a non-secure login page, put a https in front of the address in the address section of your browser, and that should get you a secure page. Secure pages are less prone to hacking, and also keep your usage details more private. For example: http://members.dirtyflix.com/en/ is not secure. https://members.dirtyflix.com/en/ is secure. -Not much effort is put into making the models attractive or glamourous with either make-up or clothing. But these are young (mainly late teen or early 20s) models who are naturally attractive. -There is very little diversity in the models. Not a con for me, since these are white, slender teens, with attractive faces and bodies. -In addition to the cheap clothes the models wear, the sets are also cheap. Cheap locations, cheap furniture. The saving grace is the models are attractive, and you can ignore the threadbare plots. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Ads on every page, standard for porn sites. -The photosets are screencaps, so the quality is poor or just OK. Not worth collecting, even when the models are cute. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -Network stats: Videos: 1626 Duration: 706 hours Pics: 118,069 Models: 832 Data size: 2,234.53 TB Looking at the network stats, you see that the network has a large amount of content. The site stats include 177 videos plus matching photosets. -The network has around 14 sites, so you get some diversity in the theme. There is very little plot to the videos. You get a guy and a girl, and they suck and fuck. Little foreplay, it must be the water in Russia that makes these guys and gals so horny. (Joke, but it accurately describes the recurring plot, which is, "Hi, lets fuck already). The site theme is "She is nerdy." They often establish this by having the model wear glasses. Or by putting her in a library or book store at the start of the video, to show she is intelligent or nerdy. What used to be called a bookworm, when I was growing up (in the Dark Ages). But even nerdy girls are hot to trot, at least the ones shown at this site. There are many fine teen networks on the internet. If you find a holiday special, where you can join for $60 for a year, this might be a worthwhile join. The content is mainly exclusive. Although most models are featured at many different teen sites, the videos themselves are basically exclusive to the site. The network gives you a chance to see some of your favorite Russian porn stars starting out as teens. Could the site (and network) be improved? Obviously. The technical features of the videos are good. The cheap sets, cheap clothes, lack of a plot which might make the sex more memorable, degrade the viewing experience. But if you know beforehand what to expect, $60 for a year's worth of porn is not bad. There are many sites/networks I would join before joining this one, but the site/network is not a ripoff. You get hundreds of cute East European teens, which is the main draw. 11-06-22  04:22am Replies (0) Review 184 She Is Nerdy (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Site is part of the Dirty Flix network. If you join through the She Is Nerdy site, you will pay $30/month, or $120/year. But if you join through the Dirty Flix site directly, you can normally find discounted prices of $15/month or $60/year. I joined through Dirty Flix for $60/year. Joining through She Is Nerdy and/or Dirty Flix gives you access to the same sites. -The videos have your choice for downloading of low, medium and high definition. And since November 2016 they added 4K definition for downloading. But for online streaming, they stream at 240p, 720p, or 1080p. There is no 4K option for streaming, even on the newest videos. -There is an accompanying screen shot set for each video. The zip file comes in only one definition. The screen shot sets vary between 40 to about 80 screen shots. These are screen shots, not photos. -No pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. Unusual. I looked all over for a pre-checked cross-sale, but finally realized there wasn't any. Cons: -On the public page, it tells you you have 5 video previews, to see what the quality of a video looks like. Except, when you click on a video preview link, instead of watching a video preview, it brings up the join page, where the prices shown are expensive: $30/month, or $120/year. Two cons: the prices shown are expensive. instead of viewing a sample preview, you get the join page. Where's the sample preview? You have to join the site to see the video. Ha-ha. Joke is on you. -The login and member pages are non-secure. Your browser will probably have a popup notice stating "This conection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised." -There are no video previews in the members area. If you want to know what the video is about, you can look at the thumbnail screen shots, or you can read the generic text description which tells you a model will get fucked by a stunt cock. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): There is minimal plot to most of these videos: You have a cute girl who starts off wearing glasses (which is supposed to show she is a nerdy girl), you've got a young stunt cock who's got sex on his brain (these are Russians, remember), they touch, they kiss, then it's off to teen hardcore heaven. -Irregular update rate. From 2 to 4 new videos per month. But if you count the accompanying screenshot sets, that means 4 to 8 new items per month. -Verotel is the default payment processor that I used. Not as widely known as CCBill or Epoch, but a trusted name in high-risk payment processing (the classification for porn pay sites). -There are ads on every member page, but that's standard to most porn sites. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site stats: Movies: 121 Photosets: 121 Models: around 121 Site launched in 2014 Videos run about 20 to 30 minutes The photosets are screenshot sets, not photosets, since the contents of a set are screen shots. Screen shots are lower quality than photos. The definition is usually less. The focus is not as good, the composition of the image is normally less artistic. Site theme: nerdy girls having sex. What makes a girl nerdy? She is wearing glasses. That's all it takes. And sometimes the girls aren't even wearing glasses. You have to take the site's idea that any girl can be nerdy. And most of the girls at the site are cute teens (or early twenties) who are wet inside and ready to milk your cock with their mouth and pussy and even their ass. Let me emphasize how cute and hot these teens are. You would think the sex would get repetitous and boring very fast. But if you're into attractive teen girls like I am, the videos are more than watchable, they can be arousing. The site (and most of the network) does a fine job selecting cute teen models who put on a show for you. These girls are almost all featured at competing teen hardcore sites, like Nubiles.net, Nubiles Porn, Team Skeet, Teen Mega World, Twistys, etc. Some of them can even appear at MetArt. The plot or setup to the sex is usually minimal. The screenshot sets are usually not worth collecting, even if the models are attractive, because the quality of the screenshot is not good or just OK. But the videos are definitely worth collecting. The models are cute, the images are clear and crisp, the video does a fine to excellent job capturing how attractive these young girls are. The models don't wear a lot of makeup, the sets are not expensive but not overly cheap, the video is like a slice of life of what you'd like to see (and do) if you were a teen or early twenties person again with one of these lovely young women. This isn't glamcore or heartcore, but it's a closer to slice of life of what you wish you had been exposed to as a young man. Although many of the model and stunt cocks are Russian or from that region, there are some from America. So some videos do have English dialogue. But dialogue, or its lack, is a minor element in the videos. Although I enjoy plot-driven porn, especially when it's done well, any plot is a minor factor in these videos. You've got a nubile girl and a guy that wants to get his rocks off. It's not rough, crude, or over the top sex. Instead, it's two young people enjoying each other without guilt or any other baggage. Occasionally there is a touch of romance, if you want to consider kissing and holding hands romance before the hardcore sex. But the site focuses on the hardcore sex. The site and network has a simple structure that is easy to navigate. There is a search engine, if you want to check the video for a title you've seen. There are hot links for all the model's content at the network, once you click on her name. The models themselves, as I've stated, are young white teen- or early-twenties- girls who are mainly attractive. Little effort is put into presenting them attractively, but they are naturally young and attractive to begin with: they don't need much make-up, expensive sets, glamourous costumes, or extensive lighting. I'm giving the site a score of 90. The site focuses on teen girls who are into sex. The videos are mainly bread-and-butter hardcore sex, but I enjoy them. If hardcore teen sex is not your niche, you would score the site lower, and would probably be bored with it. I regard the simple plots, or lack of them, as a positive, because most porn starlets are poor actors. There's no problem with a stupid plot, because there's almost no plot in these videos. You have a girl and a guy, they meet or are together, and they have sex. 06-19-21  05:45am Replies (0) Review 185 Sinful Raw (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Prime network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. You don't have to pay extra for any premium sites. -Video definition is 540p through 4K. -Zip file for the photoset of the video. -High production values: Even though the site specializes in shooting dark videos and photosets (are they trying to save electric bills?), the costumes are expensive, the sets are expensive, the background music is tasteful, there is ample use of oils for sensuous massages and sensual fucking. Cons: -Small site. Only 19 videos (plus matching photosets). -Slow update rate. -Captcha required for login. -Pre-checked cross-sales on join pages. Bottom Line: -Video content: 19 videos. -Video runtime: averages around 30-32 minutes. -Photosets: 19 photosets. -Photosets run around 134 photos per set. Site theme: Sex is sinful. Forget that sex is needed to make children, which is God's plan to replentish the earth after adults die. The site shows how people with twisted desires are having all kinds of dirty, evil sex: Blowjobs, pussy eating, masturbation, handjobs, pussy fingering, orgies, bondage, this site shows how men and women can cheat on their partners, and fall into temptation while doing the devil's work. There's also vaginal and anal sex. The site features videos with not only dark themes, but dark lighting as well. You have boy/girl sex, threesomes, one guy with multiple girls, lots of oil to make the naked bodies glisten with passion. This is stylized glamcore. Trying for an aesthetic vision of raw, sinful sex. I'm repeating myself, but I saw Emmanuelle (1974), the French softcore movie with Sylvia Kristel, and Story of O (1975), also a French softcore movie. Both of those movies had a visual and emotional impact that was undeniable. I believe the 1970s was the golden age of porn (except that the internet in the 1990s and beyond has also produced a huge amount of high quality softcore and hardcore content). The great thing about Emanuelle and Story of O was the plot made sense, the acting was acceptable to good, the models/actors were extremely attractive, the colors and images were crisp and clear. I bought DVDs of those 2 movies from Amazon, and the DVDs were degraded copies of the original movies. A shame. Because those 2 movies were impressive. Sinful Raw videos and photos use dark lighting to try to make the scenes erotic and sensual. The sex is supposed to be sinful. I think the stylized approach of the site is pretentious. I appreciate the simpler style of Massage Rooms, where the scenes are more brightly lit, so you can see the models more clearly. I mean, if you have attractive models, let me see them. Except that the models at Sinful Raw are not the most attractive models you've ever seen: so maybe the darkness helps to hide the blemishes, age wrinkles, whatever, and your imagination is supposed to be fired into thinking these are godesses who are getting fucked. Except my imagination is limited, and I prefer the Massage Rooms videos, where I can see the lovely models, and see them getting massaged sensually, and then getting fucked sensually. Or getting fucked energetically. But let me see and admire and crave the bodies of lovely young models, instead of squinting in the dark to see what the model looks like. Maybe they should have the models fucking in a dark closet. Then I could use my imagination, instead of trying to see what the models look like. To see what the models are supposed to be doing. I know they are supposed to be doing naughty things, but it would help to be able to see the naughty things they are doing in the dark. Pure Taboo, a site in the Adult Time network, often uses dark lighting, which is also supposed to heighten the erotic mood. But Sinful Raw goes overboard with the darkness, and you often can't see what the performers look like, or what they are supposed to be doing. I'm giving the site a score of 78. It's a tiny site. Currently 19 videos and matching photosets. The idea of stylized hardcore glamour is good, but they go overboard with the darkness. The videos show high technical qualities, except you can't clearly see the models because it's too fucking dark. I much prefer Pure Taboo, a competing site from a competing network. Pure Taboo is probably the finest story-driven hardcore site on the internet. The Sinful Raw site videos don't have much of a story: you see models fucking, and you're supposed to think there's some story behind the fucking. 12-22-21  02:50pm Replies (0) Review 186 Sinful XXX (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -A tiny channel from Adult Time. There are only 11 videos and matching photosets at the channel. Actually, this is the Adult Time version of the site. I have an Adult Time membership through 21Sextury.com. I should also have an Adult Time membership from my Devils Film membership, but as far as I can tell, I was never given an Adult Time membership from Devils Film, even though Devils Film advertises that you get an Adult Time membership as a free add-on with a membership to Devils Film. The SinfulXXX site still exists as a separate entity, and you can join that site directly, giving you a much larger amount of this style of content. There are approximately 200 videos at the SinfulXXX site. Note: I've noticed that when a site is merged into the Adult Time network, sometimes it maintains a separate existence for a while, and you can join that site directly. However, the separation can dissolve over time. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): I have a membership in Devils Film, which became part of the Adult Time network a while back. Until recently, I could log in to the Devils Film site directly. Today, when I log in to the Devils Film site, I am re-directed to the Adult Time network, even though I still have a paid membership in Devils Film. Also, my membership to Devils Film was through FameAid(the biller agent). And when I logged into my Devils Film site directly, and was automatically transferred to Adult Time, the billing details of my Devils Film membership were not available. Since I copied my membership details to Devils Film, I simply used a live chat with FameAid to cancel my Devils Film membership. Sorry for the involved explanation of how I cancelled my Devils Film membership. But you need to copy the details of each membership when you join. Because cancelling a membership can get tricky. Especially when they merge sites and seem to drop the membership details of some of your join sites. Bottom Line: CONS(START OF): -Site favors large-breasted women, so implants are common. -They add a plot to the videos, to make the sex more meaningful, but the models are poor actors. -For glamcore sex, I much prefer The White Boxxx, probably the finest glamcore site on the internet. Or the early X-Art videos, which can be more erotic, with greater heat, than the SinfulXXX videos. -Adult Time has a pre-checked cross-sale. So does the SinfulXXX site. But pre-checked cross-sales are standard for porn sites. -Uses a proprietary biller: VXS Billing. I'm more comfortable with CCBill or Epoch. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): This is a glamcore site geared toward sensual erotic scenes. The target audience seems to be couples who enjoy racy sex. This is porn with a strong artful approach: the scenes are darkly lit, the video quality is excellent, the sex is slow and sensual. They also use oil or water on the models' bodies to highlight the sex. Most of scenes are man-woman, but there are also some lesbian and two women-one man scenes for variety. The videos run for about 20-30 minutes, which is plenty of time to show the slow, sensual approach the models take for their sexual pleasure. Because the site has been partially folded into the Adult Time network, even if you are a fan of the site, I would hesitate to pay for a long-term membership (1 year) because you do not have any knowledge of how the site managers will treat the site: will the site remain a semi-independent site, with all of its content and any possible updates, or will it be completely folded into Adult Time? If completely folded into Adult Time, how much of the current content will still be available under the Adult Time network? The site does an excellent job presenting high quality sensuous videos. But the connection to Adult Time makes a long-term membership to the site a gamble. Take a month or two membership and download as much content as you want, is my recommendation. Giving the site a score of 85. 07-23-19  03:13am Replies (0) Review 187 Southern Sins (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Prime network. A fine, teen-oriented network. -They change the home page of the Adult Prime member page fairly often, so you get a current picture of the updates and live shows and whatever else is happening at the network. -Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. There is a captcha, but it's very easy to read. -Videos are offered in 540p, 720p, 1080p. No 4K option. -You get a photoset for most videos. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -The content is exclusive. Cons: -Tiny site. Only 46 videos. 32 photosets. -They were updating with 2 or 3 new videos per month. But the last updates were in November 2021. So this might be an archive site. -Videos filmed in Australia. The Aussie accents are intriguing at first, but I would prefer American English, so I could understand the dialog easier. -The females can have under-arm hair. The females can have pubic hair. Hair doesn't bother me. But it's different from the shaven look of most porn models. Bottom Line: The videos are a change of pace from the normal videos shown at many porn sites. The videos are seem more amateurish. The colors of the videos are nowhere near as life-life as the videos at the Diesel network, or the Club Sweethearts or Digital Desire sites. The idea of the site is supposed to be Aussie girls having kinky fun. But that's a stretch. Maybe I'm too jaded, but to me, watching these videos is like watching home made videos of regular-looking people with a bit of sex thrown in. The sex is not kinky. In one video, you watch 3 young women in a cabin near some woods, they go out and hang up some laundry, they take off their clothes, they talk, kiss, touch each other, lick each other's pussies. This is the Southern Sins site version of sin: minimal lesbian sex between 3 women. Give me the videos at the Wow sites, which seem like masterpieces of artistic vision in comparison: Not only are the girls at the Wow sites absolutely gorgeous compared to the models at Southern Sins, but the videos at the Wow sites have vivid colors for the flesh tones of the models, the clarity and crispness of the images at the Wow sites is far superior. It's just a completely different type of offering. Southern Sins is offering you home-style porn: the men and women in their videos are plain-style people. The quality of the videos is what you would get filming your own family at your house or at a park or on the street with amateur cameras (minus the sex, obviously). The site is worth checking out since it's included in the Adult Prime network. Think of the site as a slice of life site: you are watching home-style, amateur videos (and photosets) of mild sex. The sin is in the idea of sex. If you see two people kissing, that is sinful. Especially if they are both women. And if they have plastic ties or handcuffs on the women, Oh, God, that is perverted sex. No matter how mild the sex might be. Or, my gosh, what if a man and woman have sex on a blind date: how perverted and sinful. I'm giving the site a score of 75. I really enjoy American porn more. Or European porn. That has a more glossy feel, better scripts, more attractive models. Southern Sins gives you home-made, simple porn that is very bland. 04-29-22  05:50am Replies (0) Review 188 Spank Monster (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -This review is based on the Spank Monster channel of Adult Time. There is a separate Spank Monster site, but I would not recommend joining the original Spank Monster site for a few reasons. See the Bottom Line summary section of this review to see why I would join AdulT Time instead of joining the Spank Monster site. -Videos can be streamed or downloaded in definitions from 160p through 2160p. -The production values are good to excellent: nice sets, cute teen models, excellent lighting, good sound control. -Even though the plots soon get repetitious, and I think the stunt cock (Jay Rock) is sort of slow-witted because he keeps resisting these cute teen girls who want to fuck him, I have to give Jay credit for picking such cute teens for his step-daughters. -The models are cute teens or early-twenties girls. Not a lot of tattoos, not a lot of make-up. Very few piercings (except for the belly-button stud). Cons: -This is an Adult Time channel. So the navigation could be much better. If you try to bring up the Spank Monster channel listing, it might not load. Or if you try to get around that by an aphabetical listing of channels to find the Spank Monster channel, you can find the alphabetical listing is not alphabetical, but out of order. -The camera work could be better. The video sometimes get out of focus. And it can have jumps, which should be edited better. Really, Jay Rock should hire a videographer to shoot the videos, which would make the videos better, except he probably figures the videos are good enough without the expense of hiring a videographer. -There is no text file to explain the plot. But most videos have the same plot of the step-daughter seducing the step-father. Or a step-brother having sex with his step-sister. -Few tags to describe the video. So searching by tags is not worthwhile. -There are no model bios for the channel. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: Reasons for joining Adult Time (which has a Spank Monster channel) instead of joining the original Spank Monster site: -Membership in the original Spank Monster site is expensive. 12-month membership is $150. You can join Adult Time for $95/year, or less if you join on a holiday discount. -Spank Monster site is streaming only. Spank Monster channel includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. Actually, there is a daily limit of 300GB at Adult Time, but unless you are a porn fanatic trying to download the entire network, that limit should never affect you. So I consider that unlimited downloads, rather than having to state in every review of the network that there is a 300 GB daily download limit. -If you join the Adult Time network, you get access to over 55,000 hardcore videos, and over 50,000 photo galleries. Covering a wide variety of porn niches, with 1,000s of porn models. If you join Spank Monster site, you gain access to over 100 videos, featuring about 100 porn models. So Spank Monster site has limited content, compared to Adult Time, which has a huge amount of content. Enough said. The advantages of Adult Time over Spank Monster site are self-evident. The Spank Monster channel has 53 videos. This is 44% of the 120 videos at the Spank Monster site. The models at Spank Monster are mainly cute young teens. Mostly white. You do have a few Black, Asian, Latino models, but very few. Spank Monster channel has 53 videos. The runtime for a video is around 33 minutes. The videos are available for streaming and/or download in 160p or 240p through 2160p. There is an accompanying photo set for each video. The photo sets have about 15 pictures per set. There is a zip file for the photo sets, that downloads with a generic file name, such as 120595.zip. So you have to re-name the file, if you want to add the model's name, date posted, site, etc. But I don't know if the sets are worth collecting: -The models are cute, but the set is a small number of photos. -Some photos can be out of focus, or poorly framed. -The main use of a photo set would be to download the set, pick the best photo that shows the model in a pose you like, and keep that photo with the video, to illustrate what the model looks like. And delete the rest of the photo set. Spank Monster is a new site, started in 2021. But in a sense, it's a clone of the Jays POV site. Not a true clone, but the videos at the site (and Adult Time channel) follow the same plot that the Jays POV videos follow: -You have a stunt cock (Jay Rock) who plays the step-daddy who is seduced into having sex with his step-daughter. -Or Jay Rock can play the step-brother who has faux incest sex (faux, because these are step-relations, not blood relations) with his step-sister. - Jay Rock is the stunt cock at Spank Monster, and also the stunt cock at Jays POV. He opened this site because another site will add revenue to his wealth, but there's no difference between this site/channel and the Jays POV site in theme or plot. So unless you are a super-fan of Jay Rock, join the Adult Time network for your Jay Rock fix. Bottom Line Summary: Forget the repetitious plots. The lame dialogue. The sometimes poor POV camera work. Some of these cute teens are so fucking adorable you wish you could be the one in bed with them instead of Jay Rock. The girls put on a good show of seducing Jay Rock. The videos are good to excllent. Mainly because of the cuteness of the models, but the videos are professionally shot from the POV viewpoint, which is not the greatest. I prefer a standard shooting technique which gives you better camera angles. But the sets are expensive, and the technical features (lighting, sound control) are good to excellent. I'm giving the Spank Monster channel of the Adult Time network a score of 90. Mainly because of how cute the girls are. I don't like the POV camera-work, the lame scripts and dialogue. So your personal score could be lower. 07-10-21  06:00pm Replies (0) Review 189 Spoiled Virgins (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the 1 Pass For All Sites network. You get access to around 30 different sites. Most of those sites are teen oriented. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. Unlimited downloads is becoming rare for porn sites. -Videos from the last few years are offered in 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2160p, in MP4 format. Sometimes, the 720p or 1080p definition might be missing. Cons: -Pre-checked cross sale on join page. -Segpay was the default biller for me. Not as well known as Vendo or CCBill, but I've had no problems with Segpay. -Limited information given for the models. Bottom Line: Network stats: Total Girls: 1314 Total Photos: 1,332,666 Total Videos: 12,248 Total Content: 13,776.64 Gbs Watching the first video with Lisa and Camille, it's just a simple, honest-to-God piece of enjoyable teen hardcore. Lisa is a petite, long-legged, energetic cutie. She's not beautiful, but she is fucking attractive, and she does a wonderful job snogging the stunt cock and lesbo-playing with her attractive female roommate at the same time. This is not glamcore sex like you find at X-Art (which stopped updating around November 2022, and will probably soon vanish into internet heaven). The videos are more like you will find at Teen Mega World, and not as glossy as the videos at the Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn). If you get a holiday special, you can join for 12 months for around $90, which includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. A lot of porn sites are either charging extra for limited downloads, or eliminating downloads altogether. So the price is right for joining. I enjoy the simple plots of the videos. For two main reasons: The simple plot requires very little acting on the part of the models and the stunt cock, so it doesn't tax their limited acting talents. The simple plot, once you accept that the models and the stunt cock are playing horny young teens who want to fuck, avoids the cringe-worthy plots shown at many hardcore teen sites, that showcase empty-headed teens who fuck and suck in front of their step-relations (step siblings, step mother, step father). I know that these empty-headed teens are supposed to be a parody, but the plots and actions are so stupid it interferes with my appreciating the hardcore video action. The quality of the videos is good to very good: good camera-work, good lighting, good skin tones (which is helpful, since you can really appreciate how attractive these teen models are), good sound control, OK sets (not the cheap apartments many teen porn sites start out using at first). 07-12-23  09:00am Replies (0) Review 190 Spoiled Virgins (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Spoiled Virgins is part of the 1 Pass For All Sites network. You get access to all 35 sites in the network with membership in any one of the sites. -The main value in the site, and the network, is how many attractive virgins there are. These tender young teens are willing and able to give your their virginity because, underneath, they seem to be horny as hell. I wish, growing up, I knew how horny virgins really were. -Defloration.com is a site from a different network that focuses on virgins losing their virginity. That site seems to give a more clinical approach to sex, where the sex is less spontaneous, but it also has many cute girls. However, I don't know if all the girls are really virgins, since I've seen many of them at other porn sites. How many times can a girl lose her virginity? In porn, evidently you can stay a virgin even if you get fucked in the mouth, the pussy, and the ass time and again. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Photosets are from 60 to 300 photos. I think these are still screencaps, but the improvement over the I Fucked Her Finally screencaps is large. -You can select the interval of the slideshow for a photoset from 5 seconds to 25 seconds. Or you can download the photoset for viewing later. -There are no limits for streaming or downloads. CONS(START OF): -The main con is the site is not updating. They don't show the posting date for most videos posted at the site. But checking the list of recent updates to the network, there hasn't been a video posted to the site since April 23, 2021. It's entirely possible there hasn't been an update to the site in years. -The site (and network) doesn't bother to date the videos posted, except for a listing of recent videos. -Videos download with a generic file name, spoiledvirgins_182_1280.mp4. So you have to re-name the file to show the model's name and video title. -The earliest videos have a very low definition, 320x240. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): More recent videos have your choice of definition from 288p through 2160p. -Videos are often in Russian, with no subtitles. But the sex is what counts. The plot is either minimal or senseless. -A lot of pre-checked cross-sales on the join pages. -Almost all links work to stream the videos. I only found one video that had no link to stream the video, but you could download it to watch it on your PC. The video with no streaming link was titled "Young virgin girl fucked for the first time under a doctor's care". BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Virgins are the real thing. There's nothing better than knowing you're the first one to bonk a pretty girl. And if you have a good buddy available, the fun is more than doubled by having a threesome with a virgin. There's one video where a guy gets to fuck a virgin with professional medical help from a nurse. The virgin isn't feeling well, so a nurse comes over and tells the virgin she needs to get fucked. The virgin starts sucking her boyfriend's cock while the nurse supervises. Then the boyfriend starts fucking the virgin on the couch, the no-longer-virgin is so excited the boyfriend flips the girl over and gives it to her doggy style, and finishes off with a facial. From virgin to slut in one happy experience. And the nurse is there to make sure the virgin and her boyfriend end up completely satisfied. This is reality porn at its finest. The videos at this site are better than the videos at the I Fucked Her Finally site. The camera work is better, the lighting is better, the sound control is better. The models are presented better. In Russia, they often have a medical doctor or a nurse available, to check if a virgin needs to be deflowered for health reasons. This is useful if your girlfriend is afraid or reluctant to have sex: you have a medical professional backing you up. And in almost all the cases I've seen, the virgin ends up happy to get fucked. I'm thinking of moving to Russia, where there are lots of cute virgins, and the they are willing and eager to get fucked by older men. This site does not feature older men fucking young virgins. But there are sites in the network where older men are bonking cute young teens. It gives me hope that I too can find happiness in Russia. Giving the site a score of 85. The site is not updating. I think the plots are ridiculous. The girls are attractive, and the videos are nicely shot. But the videos lack heat. There are better sites in the network you have access to. 12-07-21  01:58pm Replies (0) Review 191 Step Siblings Caught (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Nubiles Porn network. A fine teen hardcore network with first-class production videos and easy navigation. -A lot of cute young teen and early-20s models. You find young cuties at many teen sites on the internet, but it's good to know that Covid has not stopped these attractive young girls from making good to fine content for us porn users -The network has around 19 sites. Out of 19 sites, 7 are still updating. The Step Siblings Caught site has an irregular update rate, anywhere from 1 to 4 updates per month. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. Don't have to pay extra for downloads; many other sites are now charging extra for downloads. -The photosets of the videos are worth collecting. These are real photos, not screencaps, and the photos have attractive models, good colors and lighting, nice sets, good focus. -The player to stream/play the photosets online is fast and and easy to use. Cons: -Lots of ads. First page you see when logging in is a page full of ads. Then you get ads on every member page. Ads are part of almost any porn site, but since you paid for a membership, sometimes you get tired of ads and want to see what you paid for. Did I really pay to see ads, or am I just too immature to realize ads are part of life and to get past that? -As a suggestion, if you are going to list lots of sites I might join, why not show the membership prices? I'm not going to click on the site name, just to find what the membership price is: if the price is really low, show it to me. Otherwise, stop wasting my time. Bottom Line: -Site theme is faux incest: sex between step relatives. This is one of the more popular niches in the last few years. It's supposed to be more thrilling or more perverted if you think the people having sex are related by marriage. I guess I'm getting jaded by watching porn, but the idea of faux incest doesn't rock my boat. -The vibe of the videos and photosets is teens having sexy fun. It's straight hardcore, no romance, not much petting before the sex, just horny kids fucking. The girls are usually the aggressors, the stunt cocks are teen boys (or early 20s) who are playing shy or backward who are pulled into pleasing the girls. So there's supposed to be an element of comedy in the videos, which gets old fast. The main pluses of the site (and the network) are: -The level of attractiveness of the models is uniformly high. A lot of cute young girls at the site. And the older female models are mainly attractive as well. -The technical quality of the videos is fine to excellent: clear, crisp visuals, good lighting and sound control, nice sets, nice costumes (the costumes are mainly street clothes, but regular street clothes, not cheap clothes). So it's a quality product. The main negatives of the site (and the network) are: -I wish they would get rid of the sophomoric attempts at humor and go for a more realistic vibe, or one where the girls aren't air-head nymphos seducing backward stunt cocks. But the cute models keep me coming back for more. Giving the site a score of 88. Mainly because of the cute models. But the videos, apart from the stupid plots, are worth watching for the visuals. And you get network access to a boatload of fine teen models. 05-15-22  04:04am Replies (0) Review 192 Step Siblings Caught (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to the entire network on joining. -Seventeen series included with your Nubiles Porn membership -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -Login and member pages are https secure. -PU has a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring. -Photosets are nice-sized, average about 120-138 photos per set. -PU and TBP have an error in the yearly membership. A yearly membership is $99.95/recurring. PU and TBP show a yearly membership is $199.00/recurring. PU and TBP show a yearly membership is $99.95/non-recurring. -Billers are CCBill and Epoch, both trusted names, easy to deal with, easy to cancel. -Videos can be streamed or downloade in 270p through 1080p. -Photosets are nice-sized, average about 120-138 photos per set. Cons: -The photosets are basically a wasted opportunity of attractive models. Little effort is put into making the models as attractive as possible. The lighting is good, the sets(background) are good, but they are not trying to make an erotic photo record of a sex shoot. The models are not posed in sexy positions, it's just a record of a sex scene, without trying for an erotic atmosphere. The models are attractive, but the photosets don't really take advantage of the models' physical looks. And the site has a lot of top grade models: Jillian Janson, Mia Malkova, Megan Rain, Maddy Rose, Piper Perri, and those are just the 5 models in the earliest posted videos. -Slow, irregular update rate: 1 to 4 videos per month. Site started in 2015, that's over 4 years ago, and it only has 123 videos Bottom Line: Site stats: Number of videos: 123 Video runtime: 30 minutes or less. Photosets: average 118-136 photos per set. The site is classified as reality porn. Which means that the porn is supposed to be a slice of life. Except that's a stretch: because the site porn is fantasy, featuring fake incest where step children have sex with each other or sometimes with their step parents. And the acting of the models makes it seem even more fake and not realistic. But that's one of the problems of much of mainstream porn: the models are not chosen for their acting ability, but for their willingness to strip for the camera and to be filmed in sexual situations. If you've watched a lot of porn behind-the-scene videos, you realize that porn is a business, and the models are paid performers putting on a show. Which takes away a lot of the heat and passion these scenes can sometimes generate. However, watching porn can be a learning experience. Especially with a site like Step Siblings Caught, which can give helpful hints on how to be a successful person. There's a video titled "Quarantined With My Step Sis" with Avery Cristy. She's a cute blonde model who's quarantined with her step-brother in an apartment. She wears a mask for health reasons because of the coronavirus epidemic, and she is cleaning their apartment. Then Avery and her step-brother sit on the couch, because they are bored and restless, and they start to make out. I guess that being quarantined because of the virus has made them not just bored but also horny. They move to the bedroom and the bed, and start going all out. Watching this video, I learned there can be good things to relieve your boredom if you have a step-sister stuck in the same apartment you are in. You can increase the family closeness, and have a good time doing it. Sex is the glue that keeps us together. And if you can't go out because of the quarantine rules, sex is the best way to not only relieve the boredom, but it also helps to make a family healthy and close. Bottom line: The pros for the site include: -A lot of pretty models. -Site membership is part of the Nubiles-porn network, which includes 17 sites you get access to. -The navigation is simple and easy. The cons include: -The plots for the site are stupid. Which takes away from the value of the videos. -The models, although attractive to very attractive, are not good actors: that, combined with the silly plots, detract from the impact of the videos. So even though some of the girls are very pretty, the stupid plots and poor acting can make for boring videos, and the site suffers. It's much better to watch an excellent photo site with great photography than to watch stupid videos of beautiful women. I'm giving the site a score of 79, in spite of the fact that you get access to nubiles.net, which is a great site filled with photosets and videos of cute to lovely women. Nubiles.net by itself deserves a score in the high 90s. But Step Siblings Caught, in spite of the pretty models, because it's a small site, and because the plots are silly, and the models can't act, and the videos are boring and unbelievable, is a poor site. 04-12-20  06:45pm Replies (0) Review 193 Strap Lezz (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -One of the sites under the Metart banner. This site features all the bells and whistles of the main Metart layout and features: -Simplified layout, makes browsing the site easy. -Premium photo sets, with first rate photographers doing the shoots. So the photos are basically crystal clear, nicely focused, wonderful skin tones, etc. -The videos are far superior to most videos at the Metart.com site: Two reasons for this: -This site allows a far higher element of sexual hardcore than the main Metart site. -Whoever is directing the videos (and the photo sets), is showing two women not only kissing, licking and sucking, but fucking as well (with a strap-on dildo, but it makes for a nice change from a guy boffing a woman). -So the photo sets and videos are basically high-class glamour lez action with strap-ons, in wonderful color, with crisp, excellent photography for the videos and photo sets. -The selection of models is top notch. These girls are often featured at other Metart sites, Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): but here, they seem to shine even brighter. Maybe it's just acting, but the girls seem to be having fun and are into the sex. Which adds sparkle to the photo sets and videos. I have often complained that most Metart videos are boring, no matter how lovely the Metart model may be. But at Straplez, I enjoy looking through the photo sets, and really enjoy the videos. That might be because this is my first time at the site, but it's been a very pleasing membership so far. -PU has a discounted price of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month. -All content is exclusive. -No download limits, which is becoming rare at porn sites. -The models dress in attractive lingerie: nice bra and panties, nylons, stockings, etc. Which adds to the glamour of the scene. -The newer videos are available in 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p, and 4k UHD. Bottom Line: CONS(START OF): -Porn Users lists the site as "Strap Lezz". But the site calls itself "Strap Lez", with only a single "z" in the name. -Pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. -Photos have a watermark, but it's small and usually located in the bottom right corner, so a very minor con. -Like all Metart sites, this is a stand-alone site. You don't get access to other sites when you join strap-lez. -The video coding seems very inefficient. The 4k UHD file size is large, up to 12 GB. By comparison, the 1080p video is only 1 GB. What is strange, is that the 720p video is also 1 GB. (All sizes were for the same video.) You downsize to 360p, and the file size is 415 MB. Just look at the 4k UHD, which is 12 GB at StrapLez. On Metart, 4k UHD videos are 3 to 5 GB. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): If you are into lez action, I suggest giving the site at least a one-month visit. I found this to be one of the better lez sites on the internet. Extremely attractive models, simple but effective plots (even if it's just two or more females hugging and kissing and licking before they get into the sex). Plus the elements of sophistication and glamour and quality settings and quality costumes. There is nothing cheap about the site, the photo sets, or the videos. This is a first-class website. The site features attractive models performing as lesbians. Since these are porn stars, I don't know how many of these models are real lesbians, or just performing for pay. But the performance these women put on is both sensual and erotic. You get regular updates, unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. Around 9 updates per month (a mix of photosets and videos). Since the first month is only $9.95 (recurs at $19.99/month), I highly recommend checking the site out. 03-29-24  05:18pm Replies (4) Review 194 Stunning 18 (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Metart network. So you get the bells and whistles of a first rate glamour network. -You get absolutely beautiful photography. -You get a catalog of absolutely beautiful young teen (and early 20s) models. -You get unlimited streaming and downloads. -Downloads are offered in multiple definitions. -A back catalog of photosets and videos. 1656 galleries. 439 films. 533 models. Cons: -The main con is that the main Metart site is the main competitor. -Stunning 18, like all porn sites, has been hurt by the covid epidemic. They are struggling to find updates. A lot of the updates in recent months have been old content shot years ago, but posted on other sites. Avril A, a lovely teen from years ago, has 39 sets at Stunning 18 in the last 2 years, that were all shot many years ago. The sets currently being released on Stunning18 are mostly from EmasPlace.com, a softcore website that closed. That was a solo model website devoted to Avril A by Thierry Murrell. Avril A was also at Metart, Erotic Beauty, and other softcore sites. There are other models from years ago with old sets being posted at Stunning 18. But unless you've have a vast porn experience, you won't be bothered by the older sets, since they will appear new to you. And most of the models, like I say, are really cute. Bottom Line: Metart is probably the best softcore teen glamcore site in the internet. For several differnt reasons: Read my review of Metart, or other fine reviews of Metart at the PU site. But basically, -Metart has probably the largest collection of photosets of softcore glamcore on the internet. -Over 23,000 photo sets. -Over 1,800 films. (Most films are boring, not worth watching. But that's a common problem with softcore films. No matter how attractive the model is, and some of these models are the most beautiful in the world, the scenes lack heat or excitement.) -The fastest update rate for any softcore photo site I've ever seen. 4 daily updates, plus 6 updates on the first day of the month. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -Photos offered from 270p through 1080p for most sets. They started offering 4K a few years back. -The same low membership price as other fine softcore site. If you can get this for the same price, with so much more value, why not get the most for your money: if you want softcore glamour, go for Metart. So that's why Stunning 18 only deserves a 90. Because it's up against Metart, which is far superior. Even though Stunning 18 is an excellent site. Stunning 18 has fine models. The girls are cute to lovely to fucking gorgeous. And Stunning 18 has one advantage over Metart: it can have a harder edge to the photos and videos. I saw one video recently with 2 girls and a naked guy, titled "Anastasia - Helping Threesome", I suspect this video was shot for a either a competing site or a generic porn producer and posted at Stunning 18 for an update, because the film quality doesn't seem up to the Stunning 18 standards. But then again, maybe it's my eyes that don't see that well, because I have cataracts, and the images aren't as clear and crisp as they used to be. Sorry to intrude personal details, but the truth is, when I look at some videos, they aren't as crisp and clear as they used to be, and the effect is noticeable. Having said that, the camera-work in this video of 2 girls and a guy is not up to the professional standards of Stunning 18. And the set is slightly cheap. And the background music is cheap. So I think this is a rental video, or a purchased video, from some porn company. They are using filler to provide more updates. Stunning 18 tries to provide value. If you didn't have fine sites like Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy in competition, I would join Stunning 18 right away. But these other sites are the same price as Stunning 18, and they offer far more content. So I would join these other sites, before I joined Stunning 18. Even though I think Stunning 18 is an excellent site. 03-09-22  06:42am Replies (0) Review 195 Superbe (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -This is a softcore site. No hardcore action that I can find. That is a pro or a con, depending on your preferences. -The site features some of the most gorgeous models in the world. However, there are many porn sites, both softcore and hardcore, that also feature many of the most gorgeous models in the world. So what was, pre-internet, very limited access to beautiful naked models, is now basically unlimited access to beautiful naked models, of all ages (18+) through the various internet porn sites. -The site content is exclusive. This includes the photo sets and the videos. -Navigation is simple. You have a limited number of models, and each model has both photo sets and videos. So the site is easy to navigate, unlike a megasite like Adult Time. -You can favorite the models. -There is a bio sheet for each model, which lists the basic physical facts and a tiny bio. -Your choice of billing processor. I used Segpay, which appears to be the default processor. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): The site also uses Vendo, Epoch, Segpay, 2000Charge, Centrobill, WTS or PayGarden. Note: I did a charge-back with a Vendo membership several months ago, because I didn't recognize the charge. I contacted Vendo, and tried to have the charge get re-processed, but Vendo said they take charge-backs seriously, so they refused to allow me to to subscribe to that site through Vendo. Vendo also blackballed me, and when another site that I had a membership in for years was suposed to renew, Vendo cancelled the membership, instead of processing the payment. I called the credit card company that was supposed to fund the recurring membership, and they told me they did not decline the membership fee, but, that no payment request was made. I also have another membership through Vendo that is supposed to renew this month, December, and that will also be cancelled for non-payment by Vendo. It's not the end of the world, because I have too many porn memberships, anyway. Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): So Vendo is saving me money. Even though I have had many memberships through Vendo over the years, and never had a problem with them, until the single charge-back a few months ago. CONS(START OF): -An expensive site. You only get access to this one site, with no bonus sites that I'm aware of. The PU discount is $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month. Or $99.95/year (recurring). And the listed site membership prices are often higher. -You only get 25 monthly downloads. But you're supposed to get unlimited streaming. I believe the 25 monthly download applies only to the videos. My guess is that you are allowed unlimited downloads of the photo sets, but if I find out differently, I will update this review. -There were 2 pre-checked cross-sales on the join page. Both cross-sales turn into expensive memberships after the 3-day trial. -The file name for the photo set and the video does not include the name of the model, or the date posted. A sample photo set zip file default name is: 12994-gallery.zip. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The models are gorgeous. Mainly Eastern European (from Russia and Ukraine). Mainly white. This is a glamcore porn site: by that, I mean it's softcore porn, where you get models in glamorous costumes, but strictly softcore action. This is a girly site, no men allowed, from what I can tell. Little to no overt sex. The model might touch her own body, but if there is masturbation allowed, I haven't found it yet (this is only my first month here, so I've only seen a small fraction of the site content. The videos are artistic, beautifully filmed, to showcase the attractiveness of the models. There is background music to the videos, which is best played at low volume or muted. I don't know why, but the photo sets at Superbe appeal to me much more than the photo sets at Hegre. Hegre is a softcore/hardcore site which emphasizes glamcore photos, but also has softcore or midcore videos as well. So the Hegre site has masturbation and some male/female action. But the Hegre photos seem sterile to me. Even though the Hegre models are uniformly attractive or beautiful, the sets lack any heat or passion. While the Superbe photosets, although entirely softcore, can be extremely erotic. Hegre sometimes has a habit of cutting the model's face out of the photos, which I find annoying. Hegre uses attractive girls, yet he cuts out the model's face, and focuses on other parts of the model's body. Maybe it's a fetish thing with him. Superbe started around December 2020, so it's still a new site. The videos are offered in 240p through 1080p definition. The photo sets are only offered in one definition zip file. If you are into softcore nudity of lovely young models in their late teens and early twenties, I definitely think Superbe is worth a visit. Normally the membership price is overly expensive, but they have holiday sales where the pricing comes down. Currently you can join for one month for $9.95, which I think is a cheap price to explore which of these lovely models you can make your current favorites. The main negative about the site is that you are limited to 25 video downloads per month. But I believe there is unlimited downloads for the photo sets, as well as unlimited streaming. I'm giving the site a score of 90, because you get weekly updates, as well as a nice backlog of photo sets + videos for many of the models. 11-30-23  03:49pm Replies (0) Review 196 Teach Me Fisting (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the 21 Sextreme network. -21 Sextreme network is part of the Adult Time network. -Your login details (username and password) should give you access to all the channels in the Adult Time network. You don't need separate login details for each channel. -Adult Time has 1000s of porn models, many of them A-listers. Covering a wide range of ethnicities (white, hispanic, black, asian, and tran[Is tran ethnic, or what?]). You also get a wide range of model ages and body types. The Teach Me Fisting channel is only a channel in Adult Time, so that channel gives you a much narrower range of models: mainly slender white teen and twenties. -Customer support is Fame Support. They have 24/7 support, email or live chat. Live chat normally answers within a few minutes, and is the fastest way to get answers. The live chat agent is helpful and patient. I think Fame Support, because of the live chat option, is probably the best support staff of any network I've joined. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): I used to think Metart support was the best, but they only have email, no live chat. Fame Support live chat answers within minutes. Metart support answers in a few hours. -Many of the models at Teach Me Fisting are attractive: Zasie Skymm, Rebecca Black, Sasha Sparrow, Lady Dee, Yasmeena, Antonia Sainz, Elena Vega, etc. -Videos offered in 160p - 2160p definition starting December 2018. Before that, the highest definition was 1080p. -Streaming is unlimited. -Download for the channel and the network has a 300 GB daily limit, which seems huge. -There is a photoset for each video. Can watch online, or download in a zip file. Zip file has a 1280x1919 pixel definition, and a higher 4000x2668 pixel definition. CONS(START OF): -Cons are basically minor. -The channel is an archive. The last update was 2019-02-25. But the Adult Time network has 8+ daily updates. Since the Adult Time network updates daily, I ignore that this site is an archive. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -A monthly subcription normally is streaming only. I've seen some monthly subs that have both streaming and downloading, but most monthly subs are streaming only. The best way to get downloading privileges is with a yearly sub, which many PU members dislike. -There's no model listing for the Teach Me Fisting channel. There is a model listing for the Adult Time network: but that has 13863 models (male and female) listed, which is a huge number of models to search through. A dedicated model listing for each Adult Time channel would be a nice feature. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): stats for the Teach Me Fisting channel: Videos 656. Video runtime is 20-30 minutes. Photosets for each Teach Me Fisting video run around 80-160 photos per set. stats (for the 21 Sextreme network): Videos 5708 Hours of Porn 2378 Pornstars 1346 Teach Me Fisting is a lesbian site. This is a conscious choice. Someone can argue that lesbian is not a conscious choice. But if you open your mind, you might realize that a guy can put his fist into a girl's pussy, just like a woman. Assuming the guy and girl are both willing. Fisting is considered extreme porn. Maybe I'm jaded, but after a watching a few of these videos, I don't think fisting is that over-the-top. Just like anal is not that over-the-top. That's me. Some bible-thumper would probabably consider any sex extreme, if the couple is not married in church and they happen to deviate from the missionary position. The videos are professionally shot. Well lit, clear, crisp images, good colors, good sound control. Nice sets. Many of the models are young and attractive. They often feature 2 girls in a bedroom kissing before they move lower down for the breast and pussy and ass. So it's not harsh sex, but sticking your fist into a girl's pussy would be hard sex. So it's both romantic (the kissing and caressing) and hardcore (the fist in the pussy). The main attraction for me is how attractive many of these models are. Also, the videos have excellent technical quality. Although the fisting is supposed to be the highlight of the videos, the girls can easily spend 9-12 minutes on kissing, caressing, sucking, fingering, before the fisting starts. There are plenty of other lesbian sites in the Adult Time network. As well as sites that feature boy/girl sex. Some tran sex. And Adult Time is starting to add male gay content. I'm giving Teach Me Fisting a score of 93. That's mainly because of the Adult Time access. But the Teach Me Fisting site is worth checking out, if you're into attractive lesbian ladies. 12-20-21  06:53pm Replies (0) Review 197 Teacher Fucks Teens (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Nubiles Porn network. -Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. Getting to be rare for porn sites. -Videos are available in -Exclusive content. -Easy login if you have cookies enabled. Just click the login link, and you enter the member's area, without having to enter any login details manually. -You have your choice of definitions from 270p through 1080p. Some of the newer videos have a 4K option. That is for streaming and downloading. -There is a photoset for each video. The photosets average around 100 photos per set. -There is a model page, with some basic information: the model's age, country, height. But little else about the model, other than links to her videos. Cons: -The main con is the site stopped updating in 2021. Before that, the update rate was very slow, averaging one new video every few months. -Although Nubiles Porn is a teen-oriented network, most of the female models in the videos are in their 20s or 30s. So this is a chance to see some older females in the videos, if that's your niche. -The videos are basically parodies. The plots are stupid and unbelievable, but you're supposed to be laughing while watching the videos. For me, the stupid plots and stupid dialogue destroys the pleasure of watching these videos. Bottom Line: The site is an archive site. It has 39 videos, with matching photosets. If you can turn off your brain and ignore the stupid plots and stupid dialogue, the site gives you good to high quality videos: excellent focus, good lighting and colors, nice sets, good sound. The sex is basically bread and butter: not over the top gymnastics, but basic sex: cock sucking, pussy and breast licking, vaginal sex. Not a lot of affection shown in the videos: they are basically hump and fuck. The kicker is supposed to be fucking your older teacher. The female models are supposed to be teens, but many of them are actually in their 20s. The teachers are mainly in their 20s or 30s, so they aren't much older than the "teens" they are fucking. The site does have some cute models, such as Lucy Doll, Jessa Rhodes, Alexis Monroe, Piper Perri and others. But I can't get past the stupid plots and stupid dialogue to enjoy the videos. 08-19-22  04:52pm Replies (0) Review 198 Teacher Fucks Teens (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 18 different sites with a membership in any one of the Nubiles Porn sites. -Login and member pages are secure. Https. -Unlimited streaming and downloads -Site (and network) is easy to navigate and use. -Excellent search engine. -Exclusive content. -PU has a discount price of $14.95/month (recurring). -Videos are availble for streaming and downloading in definitions from 270p through 1080p. Cons: -Small site. Only 36 videos. Very irregular updates. You get one video in a month, maybe the next video is one, two or nine months later. So even though the first posted video is Dec 20, 2015, the site is small and growing slowly. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -The female models are not attractive. Bottom Line: The site was launched in Dec 20, 2015. 36 videos. Runtime is 25 to 30+ minutes. The first 5 or 6 minutes is the models talking to each other. Which is supposed to be the setup. Then, suddenly, with almost no preparation, they're either stroking cocks, fondling breasts, or whatever else the script calls for, because these are horny models whose erotic lusts were just bubbling underneath their skins, and you couldn't see it until the sexual desire started to erupt. The site theme is teachers fucking their students. This is a common theme in porn. The twist for this site is that many of the teachers are female. And they are having sex with their male and female students. That twist is not enough to make this site exciting or memorable. The female teachers are often MILFs, women in their 30s who look like aging porn stars. Although the site describes the women as "stunners" or "oh so sexy", this is typical porn hype: the average teen or adult female you see at your local mall is more attractive. The Nubiles Porn network has a lot of attractive teen models, but the female models at this site are below average in looks. The site tries to add a story to the scene: the teacher either is tutoring a student at the teacher's home or at the student's home. So the video spends about 6 minutes where the teacher is supposedly tutoring a student, then the female teacher pulls out the student's cock, or the female student pulls out the teacher's cock, and we're off to the races. The plots are stupid and unbelievable. There's no build-up to the sex: we're just watching porn models (who aren't actors) recite a few lines, before the female starts stroking the stunt guy's cock and having sex. Contrast this with the Pure Taboo site, where the models have either been given some actor training, or they can naturally act, and the models create some tension and excitement before they have sex. Some of the Pure Taboo plots can be far out or unbelievable, but at least the Pure Taboo writers put some thought into the plots they write. Teachers Fuck Teens plots are trite, stupid, and unbelievable. And it doesn't help that the female models are unattractive. The Nubiles Porn network is a good network, but it has some clunky sites. Teachers Fuck Teens is one of the clunkers. This is my personal opinion. Some members post comments for each of the videos, and the member comments are often favorable. For example: "need more new movies of her.........lovely," or "she the best!" or "great scene." Which goes to show you that what I consider sub-standard porn can be considered gold porn by others. I'm giving the site a score of 75. The main positive about the site is that it gives you access to the Nubiles Porn network, which has some very fine sites. 11-24-20  08:28pm Replies (0) Review 199 Teen Fidelity (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -If you join Teen Fidelity, Porn Fidelity, or Kelly Madison, you get access to all 3 sites. -There are special discounts throughout the year where you can join for $9.95 for the first month. -You choose your own username and password, which is easier to remember than some computer-generated login detail. -The login and member pages are https. Which means it's harder to hack. -The videos are vivid and crisp. The storylines can be imaginative: I don't mean science fiction or fantasy, but there is a plot with a dark sense of humor. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -There is a "Bonus Content" section that advertises 100,000+ scenes. I'm not sure what that includes. I have too many subs, I don't have the time to look them over, I even forget which subs I have active. But the Bonus Content appears to be access to a huge amount of hardcore videos from different sources. Some of the featured channels are Party Hardcore, Mr Skin, Vivid, and Club Seventeen. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): I click on the Club Seventeen link, and see DVDs listed. I click on the DVD for "Sweethearts Porn Tour 4", and see Barbamiska, one of my all-time favorite porn models in action. Such a tiny bundle of sex, smiley face, small, tender breasts, a wet dream come true. CONS -You can often find specials for the first month of $9.95, but the renewal price is $29.95/month. And the price for 3 months is $59.95, recurring. So this is an expensive network if you want a longer-term membership. -In the bonus content section, when you click on a DVD, and bring up a scene, they don't list the name of the model. So you can't search the videos for your favorite models by name. That's a shame, because there appears to be a huge amount of content in the bonus section (they advertise 100,000+ scenes), and the navigation is hit-and-miss searching. However, there are so many gems I can see right away, that the bonus section by itself is worth a membership. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): If they organized the bonus content with a good search engine and a few other improvements, the bonus section would be a strong challenger to the Adult Time network. -Please don't mis-understand. The Porn Fidelity, and Teen Fidelity and Kelly Madison sites have strong videos that are well worth watching. But the Bonus Content, although the video crispness does not match the 3 main sites, is also well worth watching. -The bonus content is streaming only. You can't select different difinitions. You can't download. It's almost like a tease, because I'd love to save some of these video gems. -For the bonus content, the controls are limited: no way to select definition for streaming (just a single default definition), can not watch in full screen, etc. -Sometimes you get an error message: "A network error caused the media download to fail part-way." Checking my PC, it does not appear that the video failed to download to my PC. So I assume the error message means that the video is not available for streaming at the moment. Except that when I try to stream it, it does stream. (As I already mentioned, you can't download the bonus content.) BOTTOM LINE Dixie Lynn in "Pause Challenge" shows a fresh face in porn (at least, one I haven't seen before). She has one video at Teen Fidelity. She gives a great impression of a bubbly teenager, or else she really is a bubbly teenager with lots of enthusiasm. The content at Teen Fidelity is well worth viewing. They have A-list porn stars, good sets, good lighting and sound control, good camera-work. The content is excellent quality. The site is large, with around 400 videos plus matching photo sets. For the special price of $9.95 for the first month, you are getting more than your money's worth. I don't see a listing for a 1-year membership, but it could cost over $200, which is very expensive, considering there are many fine networks available at $100 or less. The site and network are easy to use, navigation is not a problem for the 3 main sites. The bonus section does have issues, such as search problems, you can download bonus content, you can only stream in one definition, and other issues. I'm giving the Teen Fidelity a score of 92, because the videos have a strong, erotic flavor that is refreshing, and you get 2 other great sites included in a membership. You also get the bonus content: which is definitely worth looking over. With the bonus content, you have to use a hunt and peck approach, there is no search engine to find a particular model or scene, that I can find. But some of the content, although from years ago, is worth viewing: I just wish I could download some of the bonus content of some of my favorite models. Maybe I will join those sites directly, when I have more time. I already have more subs, both porn and non-porn, that I can't enjoy because there's only 24 hours in a day, and I have subs to Netflix, Starz, Amazon Prime, Hulu, as well as a bunch of porn sites that I don't have the time to visit very much. But I would give Teen Fidelity an A for quality of content, A for amount of content, and A for value: you are more than getting your money's worth (at least for the $9.95 for the first month membership). But the longer term memberships are very expensive, so they have less value. 12-31-19  09:49am Replies (0) Review 200 Teen Mega World (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -4K Ultra HD videos offered the last few years. -Daily exclusive updates. -Unlimited access to 30+ sites. -100% safe discrete billing. Vendo is the default biller. A reliable, easy biller to deal with. -Mobile & Tablet friendly -Unlimited Streaming & Downloading -High Resolution Images -5000+ videos. -2000+ models. These are real teens models (or early 20s), not older models trying to look like teens. Cons: -I think the cons are basically minor. If you're into hardcore teen porn, this is a great network. -The plots are almost non-existent. The value of the network is the stable of attractive teen girls. And the clear, crisp videos. And the good photosets. -The photosets have a zip file with only one definition. The emphasis at the network is on the videos, but the photosets have really improved over the years. Not great photos, the photosets at the Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) are much finer. But the Teen Mega World photosets are worth collecting, if you're a fan of some of these models. My guess is they use some software program to produce the photoset from the video, instead of actually photographing the photos, but the quality of the "screenshots?" is like a nice-quality photo. Not up to the standards of a fine site like Metart or MPL Studios, but still a vast improvement over the screenshots at this network from many years ago. Bottom Line: CONS(continued): -Two pre-checked cross-sales on the join page. Uncheck them, because they turn into very expensive subs in 3 days, unless you cancel immediately. -Almost all the models are from Eastern Europe (Russia and the surrounding areas). If they speak in English, it's with a heavy Russian accent. But most of the dialog is pretty meaningless, and can be ignored. -Login now frequently requires a captcha. BOTTOM LINE(start of): Teen Mega World has been around since at least 2006. So it's a great way of looking over the last 17 years or so of teen models from Russia. There over 2000 teen models at this network alone. Many of the models are featured at competing sites like the Diesel network, Team Skeet, Watch 4 Beauty, and other teen sites. Some reviews say the content at Teen Mega World is exclusive. That's somewhat true. Almost all the the videos from the Tricky Masseur site in the Teen Mega World network have been posted at different porn sites over the years. I believe these videos were first posted at the Tricky Masseur site, and then re-posted at the Diesel Network, and then re-posted at the Teen Skeet site named Rub A Teen, and at other teen porn sites, as well. What's interesting is that Rub A Teen says their massage videos are exclusive, even though they were previously posted (and are still posted) at the Teen Mega World Tricky Masseur site, and the Diesel network, and at other teen porn sites. Just another example of you have to take any claims by a porn site with a grain of salt. But most content at the Teen Mega World site is exclusive, as far as I can tell, apart from the Tricky Masseur content, and maybe a few other videos. Over the years, Teen Mega World has improved steadily. They started off as a low-rent verion of hardcore teen porn. With cheap sets, cheap clothes for the models, low-quality videos. Over the years, they've spend a lot of time improving the sets, improving the technical qualities of the videos, offering higher defintion videos (they've offered 4K videos starting in 2016, started offering 1080p videos in 2014). If you're willing to pay for a teen hardcore video site, I would first join the Diesel network. For three main reasons: Diesel (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films) is less expensive. You can often find a holiday special where the join price is around $70/year. Teen Mega World will cost $89/year, if you can find a special, for the first year. Teen Mega World recurs at $119/year. The second reason is the girls at the Diesel network are among the finest looking teen-and-early-twenties models on the internet. These girls compare to any glamour site such as Metart or MPL Studios. Teen Mega World has a ton of attractive models, but the level of the models at Diesel network is one step up. The third reason is the quality of the videos (and the photosets, as well). The quality of the videos (and the photosets) at Diesel network is better at Diesel than at Teen Mega World. Teen Mega World is definitely worth joining, if you have the time and money to look through it's large collection of hardcore teen videos. 04-12-23  07:56am Replies (0) Shown : 176-200 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.35 seconds.