Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. You get access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-The network updates weekly. But this site gets one video update per month, which is very poor. Actually, the update rate is less than 1 update per month. They put videos from other sites in the network into this site, and I'm counting those out-of-site-videos as part of the update rate, since it's often difficult to tell from a video whether it really belongs to this site or should have been put into one of the other network sites. Or maybe a video is double-counted, and the same video is put into the Unlimited MILFs site and also put into a different site such as Family XXX.
-Videos for the last few years are offered in 360p through 4K definition.
-There is a photo set for each video. And it has a zip file. But the photo set is only offered in one definition for downloads. Except I don't like any of the models at this site, so I passed on downloading.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The videos at the site are exclusive to the network (exclusive to the network, but you can find a lot of the videos from this site at a different site in the network).
-As far as I can tell, there is unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading for the site and the network.
CONS(START OF):
-Navigation is poor. They don't put the posting date for each video in a convenient position.
-The links are slow to respond. You click on a hot link, and can wait a minute or more for the page to change to your destination.
-A lot of the models have breast implants that are large to huge. I'm not a fan of breast implants, especially oversized breasts.
-A lot of the models aren't very attractive.
-There is a lot of screaming and yelling to show fake excitement. Play these videos on low volume, or your neighbors will wonder what the fuck is going on.
Bottom Line:
Site features videos where the stepmom has sex with her stepson. There's very little lead-in to the sex, almost no plot, other than they establish that the older woman (in her 30s or older) is the stepmom and the stunt cock is her stepson. And then they suck and fuck and whatever. Which gets old fast, since the models aren't that attractive.
I much prefer other sites in the network, such as Family XXX or The Lesbian Experience, where there is more of a story, and the models are better looking, and usually younger. And there are less implants. And a lot of the models have tattoos, which I'm not a fan of.
Videos run around 30 to 35 minutes, which would be a good length, if there was some story to give meaning to the sex, which there isn't. And since I don't find the models attractive, the site is basically a waste of space for me.
But watch a few videos, and maybe you might enjoy these videos. Maybe yes, or maybe no.
I realize I'm being very critical.
The reason is, I do enjoy watching some of the videos at some other sites: either I enjoy the stories, or the more attractive models, or the visual sex, or a combination of those factors. So, why should I watch the videos at this site, which feature models that I don't find attractive, and almost-no-plot stories, and sex that is basically boring?
So the site is a waste of my time.
And the navigation is poor: Not only are the hot links slow to load content, but moving around the site to explore what it has to offer is slow and cumbersome. And the search is poor: you enter a model's name, and it will give you a bunch of names in return. And if you do get to the model's page, it probably won't list all of her content at the site or network.
They need to get a software engineer to re-vitalize the site and network, and make it easier to use.
You can often join this site during holiday specials, for $60 a year. But the question is: why would you want to join for a year?
Most PU members would only join for a month, and download whatever they want from the network.
And then rejoin a year or two later, to see if there is any new content they might find interesting.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good update rate: they add a new photoset or video every day or every other day.
-Video and photoset quality is outstanding.
-The selection of models is very good. I would rate the Metart, MetartX, Love Hairy (all part of the Metart network) as more attractive, but I doubt any PU member would kick any of these girls out of his or her bed.
-In the last few years, the site has focused on two girls getting it on,
or solo masturbation. The girls (late teens, twenties) are attractive, but I would rate Love Hairy and MetartX models slightly above the VivThomas models. Let me explain: how a model is photographed can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears. Also, you have more control over a model's appearance in a photograph than in a video, more control over the lighting, use of cosmetics, photoshopping, etc. And in my opinion, even if the same model appears at all 3 sites, her appearance at Love Hairy and MetartX is usually better than her appearance at Viv Thomas.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder: but the photographer can make a huge difference in a model's appearance: with lighting, setting, cosmetics, photoshopping, etc.
One of the finest sites for making a model appear glamourous is The White Boxxx, which makes an art of making attractive models appear like movie stars, even when they are doing hardcore sex.
-Content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
CONS(START OF):
-Viv Thomas is an excellent site. The cons are minor.
Navigation is easy. The content (films and galleries) have extensive tags that make finding the content that appeals to your tastes easy. The model index is good: oversized headshots of the models. But even though these are attractive to beautiful women, the headshots often don't emphasize their beauty. The staff, or whoever is responsible to making these headshots, need to re-photograph the model's headshots to show how lovely they can be.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
They need to sell the beauty of the models. Appearance or presentation is vitally important in a glamour site.
-Viv Thomas is a stand-alone site. It's part of the Metart network, but membership in Viv Thomas does not give you access to any other site in the Metart network.
-You do get access to the Metart live cam shows, but that that's standard with any Metart network site. And they really push the live cam shows, with ads on every member page.
-Like many or most Metart network sites, you can buy individual photosets and videos, even if you're not a member. But the prices are not cheap. A better way to download the photosets and videos is to join for a month: much cheaper, especially if you want to download more than a few sets.
-They advertise daily updates. But the update rate is really every 1 or 2 days.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Number of films: 2,123
Number of galleries: 3,322
Number of models: 1,095
Number of contributing photographers: 36
Most of the models are attractive, and many are familiar from other sites in the Metart network.
-Viv Thomas was started by Viv Thomas around 2000, so it been around over 20 years now.
The Metart people took over the site in 2014. Domai, which started around 1997, used a simpler style of female solo nudity. And then Goddess Nudes was started by the same founder of DOMAI a few years later, to create a slightly edgier site. DOMAI and Goddess Nudes were added to the Metart network when the founder's age made running the sites increasingly difficult.
All 3 sites were famous for the quality of the content. Although the Viv Thomas site was much more sexual, with solo, lesbian, and boy-girl content. DOMAI and Goddess Nudes were mainly simple solo female model sets.
Once Metart took over the sites, they slowly changed the site structures into the Metart network style, to make navigation easier and to add the frills that the Metart network sites are known for.
Photosets are available for streaming and downloading in 3 definitions.
You can control how the photosets are displayed on your monitor: resolution, number of thumbnails displayed per page, slideshow interval time, whether comments are displayed or hidden, sort order for films and galleries, etc.
You also get the standard blog for the Metart network, tailored to the Viv Thomas site.
Large, well-photographed photos of one or two lovely models, with a link to a short erotic fiction based on the gallery or film displayed.
Viv Thomas is basically a fine site: easy to use, good customer support (but telephone and live chat service would be faster than email support), good erotic content for solo masturbation and two-girl lesbian sex.
I'm giving the site a score of 91. It's an excellent site, and PU has a discounted membership price of $20/month. Or $100/year, if you're into lesbian sex.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. This is becoming rare in today's porn world, where many sites either limit downloads, or make you pay extra for downloads, or eliminate downloads from some memberships.
-The site features many of the most beautiful women in the world. At one time (back before the internet), this would have been a massive selling point. But with sites like Metart (and it's sister sites), MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., sites with beautiful women are a commodity. It doesn't take away from the beauty and quality of the models, but it's human nature to devalue what is so freely available.
-However, the quality of the photography is excellent, and easily compares to the best that sites like Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy offer. The attractive models (I downplay the models, because many of these models are equisite and breathtaking and filmed with care) are a delight to look at.
-Site updates 3-4x per week.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Payment is easy: You can pay with a credit card (Visa or Mastercard), PayPal, or Crypto. I'm old-fashioned, but if you pay with Crypto, I've read that if you're a US citizen, you will have to include on your income tax report your short-term and long-term cryptocurrency gains and losses on Form 8949. Not reporting all crypto gains and losses is considered tax fraud.
So I'm glad I haven't had this problem yet.
-The mix of women is broader than traditional sites like Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy. You get your normal selection of white models, but you also get a strong element of Black, Indigenous, and people of color. This will be a plus for PU members who are craving something beyond the white models normally seen.
-I don't think of this as a mega-site like Metart or MPL Studios, but there is a large amount of photo sets and videos packed into the site. The layout is easy to navigate. The quality of the images is top-notch. You have hundreds of glamorous girls for your
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):viewing pleasure. Hundreds of lovely girls in thousands of photosets, hundreds of videos of these stunning models, the videos are mainly solo shoots, with the girls moving around and exposing their lovely bodies, having some sexual fun with other female models or masturbating by themselves.
-Listed price is $29.95/month. But PU offers a discount of $14.95 for the first month. Or if you look around, you can probably find a $9.95/month discounted special.
Hundreds of lovely girls in thousands of photosets, hundreds of videos of these stunning models, the videos are mainly solo shoots, with the girls moving around and exposing their lovely bodies, having some sexual fun with other female models or masturbating by themselves.
CONS(START 0F):
-I think the cons are basically minor for the site.
-Personally, I'm not a big fan of tattoos on women. But it's becoming more and more common over the years. And many of the Watch4Beauty models are into tattoos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Normal for almost all porn sites.
-My biggest con is that I wish there was more content of most of my favorite models at the site. Some models do one or two shoots, and then move on to other web sites.
-Years ago there used to be a few bonus sites, but they dropped them. However, the site contents is well worth the money to join, if you are into lovely young women stripping and showing off their bodies for your viewing pleasure.
-I'm more familiar with the download system used at Metart, Femjoy, etc, where you can easily select the video of your choice and the file defintion, or the photo set of your choice and the file definition, but the Watch$Beauty system, while not as refined, is still usable.
-Sometimes the file download speeds seem sluggish. I wish they were faster downloads.
BOTTOM LINE
The emphasis is on the photos. There are hundreds of videos that are definitely worth watching, but the true value, for me, is the photo sets.
I could stare for hours at Rinna's 2 photo sets. She's such a luscious model, young, vibrant, fresh, lovely, charming.
In summary, I believe I've listed the main reasons for joining this site. Gorgeous models representing a wide variety of ethnic types, top class photography, a mix of high-rent locations where the girls are having fun exploring their lucious bodies. They freshen up with the offerings with casting, peeing, masturbation, girlsinlove. So they put more thought and care into the shoots than most softcore photo sites.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Focuses on solo girls peeing.
-Quality site for this niche.
-Rabbits Reviews (a sister site to PU) has discounted memberships to the Wet and Puffy network of:
$9.95 for the first month (recurring at $29.95/month)
$60 for the first year
$199.95 lifetime membership
-Navigation is easy.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-320p through 1080p videos. They advertise 4K is available, but I haven't seen them at this site. Maybe at another site in the network?
-Downloads/streams to PCs and mobile devices.
-Weekly updates.
-Cam shows.
-5 sites are included in your membership:
Wet & Puffy; Wet and Pissy; We Like To Suck; Eurobabe Facials; Simply Anal.
-The videos are good quality: nice sets, good camera work, nicely focused, well lit, good colors on the skin tones and the entire shot, good sound control.
Cons:
-The models range from plain or unattractive to some that are attractive. But the general level of the models' attractiveness is below the standards of most teen sites.
-Login details (username and password) are computer generated.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Pissing is the main focus, almost the only focus. of the site. No b/g, no g/g. So if you're not into pissing, the site would have limited appeal.
Bottom Line:
Stats:
Most videos run about 30 minutes.
Video definition from 320p through 1080p.
There is a low quality and a high quality zip file for each photoset, that is a record of the video.
The site theme is solo women pissing. I think piss smells bad, and it seems like an un-hygenic thing to rub piss on yourself, or piss on a furniture or the floor, or to drink or lick piss. But the models at this site are moaning and groaning like pissing is enough to get them off, without a male or female partner needed.
So if you're into pissing as a fetish (not painful or sadistic pissing, but pleasurable pissing), this site is for you. Because that's what the videos feature: lots of solo girls pissing, and rubbing the piss on their bodies, and drinking it, with lots of noise to show how wonderful the piss is when they rub it on themselves, or when they drink it.
But the girls can bring out a dildo, after they've been playing with their piss, to reach a higher orgasm. I guess the combination of piss and masturbation is the perfect combo for these girls. Because they've been pissing and stopping, pissing and stopping, but they manage to piss even more after masturbating with a dildo,
Watching these videos reminds me of the song, "Cry me a river", except in this case, it's more like "Piss me a river". The amount of piss these girls make is tremendous. I wonder if they use some device that makes water flow from the girls' pussies. That would help with the smell, and make the drinking and rubbing more hygenic, and the clean-up easier.
Because you have to watch a few of these videos to believe how much water/piss is coming out of a girl's pussy during a single 30 minute video.
I take diuretic pills (also called water pills) for health reasons, prescribed by my medical doctor. So I often have to pee every few hours (even at night, which wakes me up when my bladder is full). But I can't pee anywhere near what these girls are peeing.
They are younger than me, don't have my health problems, so I can understand they can pee more.
But not in the quantities of pee that seems to flow in a single 30-minute session. I couldn't pee that much in several days. I mean, it just flows, stop, flows again, stops, flows again, then flows some more, in small and large amounts.
So I'm suspicious that some of the "pee" is really water, coming from some hidden device.
Which might hurt the fantasy.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
The site is heaven for pee fetishists.
Site structure makes for easy navigation.
Videos are professionally shot, excellent camera work, nice settings, excellent lighting and sound control and colors.
Photosets come in a zip file of two definition: regular and high definition.
I wish the models were more attractive. But that's a personal preference. Some PU members might disagree with my preferences, and think the models are very attractive.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Joining any site in the small network gives you access to 5 sites.
The 5 sites are listed in the Bottom Line section of this review.
-Navigation is basically simple.
-There is a text file that describes the action of the video very well.
-Also, plenty of tags to describe the action of the video. So search is easy and can be very detailed, if you want it to.
-Newer videos have a definition of 320p through 4K. The 4K video file size is around 3.35 GB for a 23 minute runtime video, so the coding seems efficient.
-The content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-The level of attractiveness of the models is poor. Other PU members have written that they find the models to be attractive. I disagree completely. I respect the opinion of these PU members, but find it hard to agree with their opinion.
-I find the quality of the videos and photo sets to be poor. The images are not crystal clear, but either slightly unfocused or with a slight haze to the image. But since the models are not attractive to begin with, I wouldn't mind watching the video with the images in complete darkness, so I wouldn't have to view the models at all. (That is a joke, but also has an element of truth. These models are far below the attractive level of the Teen Mega World models, and comparing the models at Wet and Puffy to the models at the Wow sites is like comparing night and day: the Wow site models are fucking georgeous; the Wet and Puffy models are unappetizing.
-The online mechanism for viewing photo sets is clunky. Slow to load images.
-Pre-checked cross-sale.
Bottom Line:
The 5 sites of this network include:
Wet and Puffy We Like To Suck
Wet and Pissy
Simply Anal
Eurobabe Facials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Membership in any one site gives you access to all 5 sites.
The stats for Wet and Puffy network:
Over 27000 photos. and
Over 480 models.
They advertise that the photos are the best ultra high definition picture sets.
They advertise that the tags, filters and layout of each page makes browsing simple.
The thumbnails that illustrate the models have washed out colors.
Even models that appear young and attractive at competing sites look plain and unattractive at this site, in the photo sets and videos.
You examine a photo in a photo set, and it appears as if the photo was taken with a filter that makes the model appear slightly out of focus.
Each photo set has 2 definition zip files, low and high.
The low definition is 666 x 1000 pixels.
The high definition is 2267 x 3400 pixels.
In the photos, the models are uniformly unattractive. They are plain-looking women. You go to a local mall, you find plenty of good-looking teens or twenty-year-olds. The models at this site are mainly in their twenties or thirties, and they are far less attractive than the normal twenty-thirty-year-old you find at your local mall. One reason is the photos have washed-out colors, so the skin tones of the models are not pleasing. A second reason is the models themselves are below-average in level of physical looks. Plus many of the models have lots of tattoos, which I'm not a fan of.
Even though the site advertises "best ultra high definition picture sets", I look at sets and feel the quality is far below the quality of any photo site, in any technical feature you can think of: these photo sets are shit. Teen Mega World, which is a hardcore teen site, has photo sets that are far superior in technical quality to the photo sets at Wet and Puffy. The the quality of the teen models at Teen Mega World is far superior in attractiveness to the Wet and Puffy models.
The Wet and Puffy models are mainly plain to unattractive. The photos are not worth collecting. They aren't even worth viewing.
Note: some of the live cam girls are really attractive.
Note: my opinion seems to be in the minority.
There are some attractive models at this site, but they are not presented attractively at the site. Delphine and Nika O, two girls who normally look very attractive at other sites, look washed out (in color and skin tones) and blah at this site. How a girl is photographed can make a huge difference in her appearance. Besides which, most of the models at this site are not that attractive to begin with.
Maybe I should have my eyes checked. I look for attractive girls at this site and can't find any. Some of the girls are attractive at other sites, but not at this site. I know that beauty is supposed to be in the eye of the beholder. The average female at any local mall, or even your local grocery store or Walmart, is far more attractive than the models at Wet and Puffy.
Maybe my problem is expectations: I assume that most models are chosen for their looks. But at this site, I think they were chosen for performing hardcore sex. Without bothering to filter for attractiveness.
The photo play mechanism for viewing photos online is clunky. Images are slow to load. The images themselves are poor in color, poor in clarity. You aren't viewing sharply defined images of the model.
The composition of the photo is poor. The sets are inexpensive or cheap and lacking in any imagination.
Overall, the photo sets are a waste of storage space, and not worth viewing.
I was a member of this site before, and wrote a review that highlighted how poor the site was, in terms of the attractiveness of the models, the poor quality of the photo sets. But my memory is poor, and I forgot how unappealing the site was. Which is the reason I rejoined. I was stupid.
Other PU members seem to appreciate the site much more than I do. They cite the attractive models at the site, the ease of navigation, the low membership price. I agree the membership price can be low: PU has the first month's membership for $15, or $60 for a year.
I agree that navigation is simple and effective, that Vendo and Epoch are fine billers.
But I can't agree the models are attractive.
Poor models, poor photography. And that kills the site for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They are running a current special of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
But the special one year price is $60, which is very low.
-Vendo is the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). So ISP does not keep a record of each member page you visit
-No streaming or download limits that I can find.
-You get confirming emails on signup, with your login details, subscription id, order details (price and duration of membership), credit card used, etc.
-Most videos are available in 320p through 4K definition.
-Videos have a runtime of 20 to 30 minutes.
-Photosets are available in zip files in 2 definitions: low and high.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-User name and password are computer generated, so have to write them down. But they are in the confirming emails, so can copy and paste into login page.
-The site has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, but the thumbnails are usually poor photos of the models: a home photographer could easily take photos that would make the models more attractive.
You look at the thumbnails of the models, and realize that the girls in any mall would look much better than what these models look like. How you photograph a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears.
I look through the thumbnails of the models, and I find some models I'm familiar with, such as Delphine, who is a very attractive blonde model, and at this site (at least, in the thumbnail), she is not attractive. Nika O, another attractive model, looks poor.
If a site does not have attractive female models, I usually have little interest in the site.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Even the models I know can be very attractive, at this site thumbnails, are not attractive.
-The online photoplayer is slow.
-The quality of the photos varies. From poor to OK.
-I've seen many screen caps at competing sites that were far better quality than the photos at this site: two problems with the photos at this site: the models are not made up to be attractive. The second problem is the quality of the photos: they are just poor photos. Even models that I've seen can be very attractive at other sites, at this site, they are not attractive. The colors of the photo are poor. The model looks poor. The photosets are a waste of time.
I look at the photos of Nika O, an attractive teen. I know it's her, because I've seen her at other sites. And I've seen her at other sites with the same name. But at this site, in the photos, she looks like poor. At MetArt, Nubiles, ShowyBeauty, she is an attractive young teen. Sexy. Erotic. An object of desire.
At Wet and Puffy, she is a piece of meat I would not look at twice.
Am I over-reacting? I don't think so.
Porn is fantasy.
But if the image of the model is so unappealing, the value of the porn is damaged.
There was a recent poll at PU that asked: "Do you feel high-quality photos are an important part of a site's content?"
Well, the photos at Wet and Puffy are not high-quality photos. They are low-quality photos, that degrade the value of the models, that degrade the value of the site.
Sites like X-Art, the Wow sites have good to excellent photosets, that display the attractiveness of their models.
The Teen Mega World network has improved the quality of their photos over the years, to the point where the photos can present attractive young teens and contribute to the quality of the network.
The photos at Wet and Puffy are poor photos, that degrade the value of the site.
Even when they do have models that are naturally attractive, those models are presented as un-attractive females.
Holly, another attractive model, has 1 video at Wet And Puffy. An attractive model, pretty face, voluptious body, but the video is hurt by the skin tones of the model. She's just not attractive.
At Wow Girls, where she's listed as Barbie, she looks great. At Wet And Puffy, because of the poor skin tones, she looks blah. Not pretty or attractive.
The lighting and other factors can add or detract from the value of a video, and at Wet And Puffy, the photos and videos are poor. Even when they take a pretty model, she will look poor or unattractive in her photos and videos at Wet And Puffy.
BOTTOM LINE(Start of):
Site theme: The site classifies a woman's pussy into one of three types:
puffy peach, juicy cherry or big taco.
So the site focuses on pussies and toys.
Whatever it takes to get a woman off.
(Except no men are allowed.)
So you get all kinds of masturbation with toys.
-You get access to 6 sites with a membership.
wetandpuffy
weliketosuck
wetandpissy
puffynetwork
simplyanal
eurobabefacials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Porn is fantasy.
One of the main factors I look at is how attractive the models are.
The models at Wet and Puffy are not presented attractively.
That is a major negative factor, for me, at least.
So, in spite of the current special price of $60 for one year, I would not join this site.
That is a personal judgment.
Other PU members have found the site to have value.
Homegirl gave the site a score of 90.
mbaya gave the site a score of 95.
tangub gave the site a score of 84.
It's a large site.
Over 900 videos.
Over 900 photo sets.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Wow network. You get access to 4 sites when you sign up to any one of these 4 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films. They often have a special discount of
$69.95/year for access to all 4 sites.
The PU discounted price is $29.95 for 2 months, recurring. $89.95/year (recurring).
-Unlimited streaming and downloads for all 4 sites.
-The model selection is outstanding. Late teen and early 20s models from Eastern Europe are among the finest I've seen. This is not a glamour site or network, but the teens themselves have appeared at many teen sites, and some are featured at glam sites like Metart and Femjoy.
-Videos from the last few years are available in 720p, 1080p, 2160p(4K), 3132p(6K). For the 4K and 6K definitions you need high-end monitors.
-You can select to stream or download parts of a scene, or the entire scene.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The photosets are high-grade photos. Not quite the same as the photosets at Metart or Femjoy, but just as collectible, considering how attractive these models are, and these photosets, especially the ones of a solo model, are just as good as anything you can find at Metart or Femjoy or any of the glam sites.
-Photosets the last few years come in your choice of definition for online viewing or downloads in 1000px, 2000px, 4000px, original. Original definition is 5760px.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. Each site is a goldmine of attractive young teens.
-Technically, when you join, you are only a member of one of the 4 sites, although you have access to all 4 sites. Not sure why they define the membership this way.
-You get one login details for 3 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), and a separate login details for the Ultra Films site. Would be simpler to have the same login details for all 4 sites.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Login details are: Username is your email address. Password is assigned random characters.
Can't choose your own password, to make it easier to remember.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
I should note that when I write reviews, I'm trying to provide details that I believe are accurate. But I don't bother trying to verify each detail. For example, when I write that a site provides unlimited streaming and downloads, I'm basing that on what I know. But I don't bother to verify each detail with the site. If I read or hear that downloads are limited to 300 GB per day, I will mention that, but since I rarely download anywhere near that limit from a site on a daily or even weekly basis, I would not experience that limit personally.
Also, some sites have limits on download managers. I don't bother to use a download manager anymore, but I've read that some sites don't allow download managers. Other sites might limit the way you use a download manager, to one stream. But since I don't use a download manager any more, I don't spend time trying to check download manager rules from a site, or write any download manager details in my reviews.
Also, many years ago sites used to use software that only allowed downloaded videos to be played if you had a current membership to the site. But I haven't seen any sites that still use DRM software in years.
Bottom line on Wow Girls: Wow Girls is an excellent hardcore teen site. The teen models are stunning. The videos are crisp and clear, with excellent technical qualities: good colors, good lighting, nice sets, nice costumes (I say costumes, but they are nice, regular everyday clothes, or lingerie, or bikinis), good sound control, etc. The photosets are also good to excellent, not glamour shots, but a good photo copy (not screenshots, real photos) of the video.
The sex is basically good clean fun: horny teens having sex. Not a lot of buildup to the sex, not much romance, almost no plot to many of the videos. Most teen porn models are not actors, so you don't have to watch them trying to act. Also, at many teen sites, the plots are so stupid you can't enjoy the action. Or the comedy is so stupid you wonder why the writers can't come up with something better. So the Wow Girls site (and the network) is a relief from stupid plots and poor acting.
I keep repeating myself, but I think the site (and network) is one of the finest hardcore teen sites. The sex is simple and usually straight-forward. No slapping or spitting on the girls, no unnecessary roughness, no over-the-top calisthenics. Just good clean fun.
Solo girl masturbation, girl-girl, more than 2 girls, throw in a boy, throw in two boys, mix and match to get some variety. But the main attraction is how cute these girls are.
That, plus the clear visuals, the excellent skin tones, etc.
This site and network are an excellent join.
Especially if you can find the $69.95/year special that is offered throughout the year.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-If you join any one of the three sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, or Wow Porn, you get access to all 3 sites.
-They've had a sale price for months now. $29.95 for 2-months membership, unlimited streaming and downloading. Or 1-year membership for $89.95 (recurring).
-The major attraction of the 3 sites is how attractive the models are. These teen girls are some of the most attractive models on the internet.
-Navigation is basically simple. You can search through the model listing (alphabetical or by popularity or latest addition). Or you can search by video or photoset (same listing system).
-There's a huge amount of content at the 3 sites. Both videos and photosets.
-The technical qualifications of the content is excellent. This is borderline glamcore. It's hardcore action, but not rough or over-the-top sex, not a lot of heartcore: mainly, it's girls getting off. By themselves (masturbation), with one or more other girls (lesbian), or with b/g, b/gg, or a few boys with girls.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
But the sex is straight blowjob, pussy sucking, vaginal and anal fucking.
-The models are naturally attractive teens. Very few boob jobs. Not a lot of tattoos or piercings. This is not a glamour site, the models don't wear fancy costumes, but the sets are nice and clean, whether indoors or outdoors, the stunt cocks are mainly attractive young male teens.
-The 3 sites have had 4K for years now. And they've started to remaster some of the videos to 6K resolution, for people who have very high resolution monitors.
My monitors max out at 1080p, and I normally watch and download at 720p (to save storage space, and because my older eyes can't tell the difference of higher definition videos anyway).
-You can download videos in your choice of definition from 480p through 4K. Some videos have been remastered to 6K.
-You can download the entire video, or can download selected parts of the video.
-You can download the photosets in your choice of zip definition.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Update rate is 1 video or photoset per day (that's for the 3 sites, not each site separately).
-The customer support is excellent, one of the finest I've ever dealt with. They have a live chat that is 24/7, that answers within a few minutes.
CONS(START OF):
-I think the cons are basically minor. The 3 sites, or any one of them, are among the finest hardcore teen sites on the internet. Lovely models, fine technical quality of the videos and photosets, girls who put on a fine show of enjoying their bodies.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The 3 sites do have some non-exclusive content. Teen Mega World (another fine teen hardcore network) and Team Skeet have a lot of the massage videos that are posted at the Wow sites. And some other content at the Wow sites is also duplicated at Teen Mega World and 18XGirls. (18XGirls site has died, I believe.)
-Rarely, download speeds might be slow. I've had almost no problems with download speeds at their sites. But also, I don't download a lot any more, so I'm not the best expert on download speeds.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is teen girls enjoying sex. The girls are lovely. The sex is hardcore, but it's not extreme, no domination, no BDSM.
Although the girls don't wear glamour costumes, and the sets are not glamourous, the sets are clean and the videos and photosets are clear and crisp and showcase these lovely girls very well. Not a lot of makeup or glamor, but the girls are so young and naturally attractive that it's a pleasure to watch them in action. And to study those lovely bodies.
There is no blog (eliminated years ago), where members can ask questions and share talk.
There is a glitch in the navigation, where if you hit the backspace button at a member page, instead of going back one page, you instead bring up the login page.
But these are all minor glitches. The site (and 2 other sites you get with a membership) is one of the finest teen hardcore sites available. I recommend the site highly, and give it a score of 94. The models are just so fine.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Teen Mega World network. Membership in any one of the network sites give you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for to access.
-It's easy to switch between different sites of the network. You don't have to re-login to each separate site.
-Low price. PU offers a $14.95/month recurring discount.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-Small archive site, only has 43 videos and matching photosets.
-Last update was April 2013. The videos are offered in 360p, 480p, 720p.
Many PU members want higher definitions, 1080p or 4K, for their viewing pleasure.
-Login and member pages are non-secure.
-The site features real teens. Some of them are attractive. But overall, I feel the site models are less attractive than the general level of the models of the entire network.
-Poor search engine. You enter a model's name, and you get numerous hits that are random. The best way to search for a model's content is to go the model's page, where you will find links to her content at the entire network.
-Vendo is the default payment processor. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch.
However, I've had many memberships through Vendo, and never had a problem.
Actually, I like Vendo, because the Vendo website shows you all your current memberships through Vendo.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Whereas CCBill will only show you a single subscription on a single page (you have to enter separately your identification details for each sub you want to look up).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-A line of ads at the bottom of each member page. Not too obtrusive.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: is a female model reaching orgasm.
Most of the videos are guy/girl, but there are a few threesomes, and one lesbian video of two girls.
The site advertises: "This amazing website provides you with the greatest collection of massive 'Oh my God' orgasms. Stay here, and experience divine arousal followed by the most powerful climaxes!"
I think that's typical porn site exaggeration.
Although the videos do show orgasm, I couldn't find any divine, over-the-top videos at the site. For that, I would recommend Rocco Siffredi or the Teen Fidelity sites, which do offer some over-the-top videos of intense sex.
The site only has 43 videos (and matching photosets).
It was started in August 2012 and stopped updating in April 2013.
So it's a small archive site.
As a small archive site, the content is standard teen hardcore. The main positive about the site is that you get access to the entire Teen Mega World network. You can skim the site contents in less than a day, downloading whatever is of interest in less than a day. But the network itself has plenty of good, solid teen hardcore content with plenty of attractive young teens.
I'm giving the site a score of 70. If the site was a stand-alone site, the score would be lower. But as part of the Teen Mega World network, the site is worth browsing to find whatever content might interest you.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-If you join one of these 4 sites, you gain access to all 4 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, and Ultra Films. Technically, you are only a member of one of the 4 sites, but you have access to all 4 sites.
-The 4 sites are basically a network. But All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are treated as a group: if you log in to one of the 3 sites, you have access to all 3 sites. You don't have to re-login to switch to one of the other sites to load their videos or photo sets.
But Ultra Films is treated as a separate site. To access the contents of Ultra Films, you have to log in to that site separately. And with a different password specific to that site.
-The models at Wow Porn are attractive. They range from cute to lovely. They are teens and early 20s. You don't get better than this at any site on the internet.
The last update to All Fine Girls was 29 Dec 2021.
The last update to Wow Girls was 14 Jun 2022, so it's still updating.
The last update to Ultra Films was 14 Jun 2022, so it's still updating.
That means 2 sites out of the 4 are still updating.
The main con for Wow Porn is it's no longer updating.
Bottom Line:
I guess Covid has really hit the network hard, and they are having financial problems.
That's my guess, based on the fact that 2 of the 4 sites have stopped updating. X-Art.com, a competing site, stopped updating in September 2021.
The site (and network) is one of the finest hardcore teen sites on the internet.
The main reasons:
-The models at the site are fucking attractive.
Many of the girls have appeared in glamour photo sites like Metart, Femjoy, MPL Studios.
-The videos and photosets are clear, crisp images. Fine technical qualities: good lighting, good colors, good sound control, good focus on the models.
-Even though the site is not small, navigation is basically easy.
-The sex is basically bread-and-butter. I mean that in a good way: it's straight sex, not over the top, not extreme. By straight sex I don't mean it's restricted to boy-girl, what I mean is, it's simple sex, young people enjoying their bodies. No hard or harsh sex, no slapping or spitting. You have solo masturbation (by a female), mutual masturbation (two or more girls), lesbian (girl-girl, more than two girls), boy-girl, 2 boys with one girl, a boy with 1 or more girls. Not much plot, not much romance. It's good, clean fun, no drama, no stupid comedy elements, just young people enjoying sex.
I've been a year-long member for several years. The network is one of my favorites.
They offer a special discount of $69.95/year throughout the year. Which is a bargain for the amount of high quality content you get. The normal discounted PU price is $89.95/year.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of my favorite hardcore teen sites.
-The girls range from attractive to fucking gorgeous.
-High production values. The videos are clear and crisp, the colors are strong, the sound control is good, the camera-work is excellent.
-If you join Wow Porn, Wow Girls, or All Fine Girls, you have immediate access to all 3 sites. That's the system they've been using for over 1 year.
-Vendo is the billing processor. Easy to cancel. Vendo website clearly shows you any subs you have that are billed through them, both current and recent past subs.
-Navigation is simple. I consider the 3 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) to be basically a single site, that is marketed as 3 separate sites, to increase revenues.
Cons:
-I was a member of the site/network of 3 sites with an annual subscription for 3 years.
I was foolish. There are often special discount prices offered during the year, but I just let my sub renew at $119.95/year.
Finally, I wised up, and cancelled my membership. Then re-subscribed at a cheaper price using their discount (I used the PU link to Wow Porn, then hit the join link, so PU should get a credit for the sub.)
But I saved $39/year by cancelling, and then re-subscribing.
So when you join, look for a special discount, or don't join.
Loyalty is not rewarded. You are charged higher prices if you blindly accept the renewal price.
-Since I was not a member of the site for about 2 days, you could say my current membership is less than one month. Or you could say that my membership is over 3 years (if you ignore the two days that I was not a member). Whatever.
-2 pre-checked cross-sales on join page.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Customer support can be hit or miss. I sent an email to customer support over 2 weeks ago, using their internal email system, asking what the update rate is for the 3 sites. I still haven't gotten a response.
-I wrote that I consider the 3 sites as one mega site. That's because the 3 sites are the same, except for the address in your browser. If you open 3 separate browser windows, log in to All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn, and the content for each window is the same. If you have a video in All Fine Girls, that same video appears in Wow Girls and in Wow Porn.
And the photo set illustrating that video also appears in all 3 sites.
As I wrote before, I don't think the owners/managers are trying to trick the membership.
A few years ago, the 3 sites were separate and distinct, with each site having its own content.
However, even back a few years ago, a video could be placed in one site, and the matching photoset could be placed in a different site. Because the truth was, even a few years ago, although the content of each site was distinct, the three sites shared a lot of the same models, and it appeared that a video or photo set could be placed in any one of the 3 sites, because the theme of each site was teen porn.
But recently, the distinction between the 3 sites has blurred: all 3 sites have the same identical content, as far as I can tell. That includes videos, photosets, updates list.
The model list for All Fine Girls and Wow Girls is identical.
But the model list for Wow Porn is slightly different.
But aside from a minor change, you could say that all 3 sites are basically the same site.
That makes managing the 3 sites easier, on a practical basis.
And I haven't heard any complaints about the content of the 3 sites being the same.
The sites used to have a blog where members could post comments and questions, and the staff would sometimes answer.
But they dropped the blog years ago, and the staff participation seems to have dropped, as well.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
There are several main factors making this one of my favorite hardcore teen sites or network (if you want to consider the 3 sites a network, although, technically, Wow Girls and Wow Porn are owned/managed by a different owner/manager than All Fine Girls).
-The models range from attractive to fucking gorgeous.
-The videos mainly are high production values: clear, crisp images, excellent colors, excellent sound control, excellent camera work.
-A lot of hot videos, where the models really seem to be getting off on the sex.
If you are into hardcore teen porn, this site should be a worthwhile join.
The sex is not overly aggressive.
It's mainly consensual sex, with very little harshness or slapping or spitting or even cursing.
I wouldn't call it heartcore. It's mainly one or two or more models having sex.
Very little plot.
But fucking gorgeous models.
And the sex can be hot.
The streaming and downloading are unlimited.
And there is a ton of content: thousands of videos for the 3 sites, most videos have a matching photoset, plus there are other photosets as well.
Wait for a special discounted price, which seems to be happening throughout the year, and join for a month. Or longer.
Giving the site (and network) a score of 95. I highly recommend joining, especially if you get a discounted price less than $90/year.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-I saw an ad for a low-priced sub to X Chimera. The models looked attractive.
Went to the site, thinking about a join. Discovered site is part of the Lets Doe It network, which I'm already a member of. I have too many subs, don't have enough time to enjoy all of them.
Glad that I found it was a site that I already have access to, because I don't want to pay for a sub that I already have.
-As part of the Lets Doe It network, the X Chimera channel has many fine-looking models. These are mainly European models, many from Russia or the surrounding areas.
-The production values of the videos are excellent. The lovely models are presented attractively.
The crown jewel of the network is The White Box, where lovely models are presented in high glamcore erotic settings.
But X Chimera also features lovely models in erotic settings. So what's the difference between the two channels? Both channels use lovely models, but at The White Boxxx, extra care is used to make the models appear attractive.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
You have to watch the videos at the two sites to see what I mean.
-Videos (and photosets) are advertised as exclusive. So unless you are a fan of tube sites, the material will be new to you.
-Each photoset has a zip file. But see cons why the photosets are a disappointment.
-You can stream or download the scenes in your choice of definition: 240p thru 1080p.
CONS(START OF):
-For some reason, even though my internet download speeds test at 17 Mbps to about 90 Mbps (these are WiFi speeds, not hard-wired speeds), the videos often hang on loading, and I can't stream the videos.
(17 Mbps is supposed to be more than enough speed to stream 1080p videos. And I'm watching these videos at 720p or 480p, which increases the margin of safety even more. But it doesn't work: these videos constantly hang up, instead of loading and playing smoothly.
I don't know what the problem is. But I suspect this is my problem. And most members won't have this problem.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Two pre-checked cross-sales on join page.
-The biggest con for most people would be this is an archive channel. The last update was 2018-10-12.
-It's a small site. Only 35 videos. Since it's not updating, it won't grow.
-Another con is that even though there is a photo set accompanying each scene, the photosets are tiny. Each photoset has 10 photos or less. Many of the models are gorgeous, they deserve a full-sized photoset, to show off their beauty.
-There is a download limit of 100 videos per month.
There is no download limits on the photosets, but since the photosets are tiny (10 photos or less per set), the value of the photosets are debatable. Even with a gorgeous model, if you only have a maximum of 10 photos in a set, unless the photographer does a fantastic job, the photo set is more like a tease than a meal to be savored and enjoyed.
Maybe I'm being too picky. You can use a single photo from the set to illustrate what the model looks like, to remind you what the scene is about. Except that it would take time and energy to select a photo to illustrate each scene(put it in the folder where the video file is kept). And I'm lazy about organizing my collection. Keep it simple, keep it easy, don't make me work to organize my porn collection.
-Photosets only have a single definition: no choice of low, medium or high definition.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The channel mixes attractive European models in a fantasy setting where the male model dresses like a rich dude who is getting off on teasing and seducing a beautiful model. So it's like a bondage scene, without the roughness and without the pain. The stunt cock is supposed to be teasing the tied-up model with his hands, lips, tongue, and various toys, into a creature of lust who only wants his cock.
So this is a glamcore version of bondage. On the style of the 50 Shades of Grey movies. Although with even less pain. The 50 Shades of Grey movies are softcore porn, but the heroine (Dakota Johnson) is supposed be feeling some actual pain from the whipping and slapping, but at X Chimera, there is not supposed to be any physical pain, except the torture of heated lust that is not immediately satified.
So this channel is the erotic equivalent of a hardcore Harlequin novel, before the Harlequin novels allowed any sex (back the 1970s).
The setup or plot used is that an attractive women is invited by a mysterious member of a secret, wealthy society.
The woman is excited to accept.
She goes to an expensive home, where she is bathed by two naked women attendants, and then led to a room where a mysterious man is waiting. The woman can be tied or chained, the man or woman can wear a mask, and the man arouses the women to the point of frenzy (the man is a masterful lover who fulfills the woman's wildest fantasies).
Both the man and the woman have powerful orgasms.
Although the idea is good, it gets repetitious after a while. Even when the women are lovely, and the stunt cocks are attractive men, you wish that there was more variation in the plot.
Maybe I'm just getting overdosed on porn.
But I enjoy the simple massage videos at Tricky Masseur. The models are lovely young teens, not presented as attractively as the models at X Chimera, but the plot is simpler, and I the model doesn't need to be an actress to enter a room, undress, get on a massage table, get rubbed down, and then do a partial blow job and and then fuck.
Simpler acting. More believable. Easier to enjoy, because there's less strain on the brain.
Lately, I've been switching off DVDs of disappointing movies that I think are stupid.
I don't have the patience that I used to.
Why waste time on junk?
And that's why I am somewhat disappointed in the X Chimera channel.
It's a good idea. They are riffing on the 50 Shades of Grey theme of glamourous sex of a lovely woman with a rich dude from a secret society.
But even though the women are lovely, it's too much play-acting for me.
I prefer The White Boxxx channel, where the setup is simpler.
My personal opinion is that The White Boxxx is the finest site for glamcore porn of beautiful women. The only quibble might be that they focus more on the glamcore, and lose a bit of heat in the sex.
I'm giving the X Chimera channel a score of 90.
That's because the channel is a good to excellent glamcore site, and also because if you get bored with the channel, you can switch to other good sites in the network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price, if you snag a holiday discount. I joined for $5.00 for the first month. This is streaming only. Downloads would be a higher priced membership. My membership renews at $19.95/month (streaming only). I plan to cancel before the month ends.
-You get access to 5 sites in the network. AllBlackX, DarkX, EroticaX, HardX, LesbianX.
-Navigation within the network sites is easy. The sites are clearly and logically laid out. Switching between the sites is easy. You don't need to log out from a site to switch.
-You can watch the full video, or a trailer, to see what the movie is about.
-The model listing is mainly attractive white women. Not the most gorgeous or glamourous, but attractive.
-The videos are plot driven. The plots are simple, but they add a slight element of meaning to the sex. And give the models a chance to show off their acting talents.
-The videos are professionally shot: good technicals (clear, crisp images, good lighting, good focus, good sound control,
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
nice sets).
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-I believe there is a 300 GB daily download limit, which seems generous.
-The last few years, they have a 4K definition streaming/download option. But all their videos have a low, medium, high and full high definition options, as well, for streaming and downloads.
-Customer service is 24/7, for live chat, phone, and email.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are mainly minor. The small network gives you access to about 1,700+ glamcore videos for a low introductory price.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The offer I signed up for stated that for a single payment of $5.00 I would get 30 days streaming access to the network. But on the confirming email, it stated that the membership renews at the end of the 30 days at $19.95/month, for streaming only. I plan to cancel before the first month ends, but it would have been nice for the membership to end automatically, without having to cancel. Am I being too nit picky?
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-You get 2 confirming emails on signup. They could combine the 2 emails into one email, for less clutter.
-The network is owned and operated by Gamma Billing Inc, which owns and operates Adult Time. Adult Time uses FameSupport, which is excellent customer support. XEmpire uses a separate customer support named openlife. Why they use a different customer support from Fame Support I don't know. Or maybe openlife is Fame Support with a different name. Why have 2 different support teams when the owner/operator is the same for both networks?
-Your account is available for life. Meaning, you can log in to the site, even if you are not an active paying member. The benefit is that you can simply reactivate your account instead of opening a new one. Other than that, I'm not sure what the benefit is, of a lifetime membership. If your membership is not currently active, I doubt that you can stream or download any videos at the network. It seems like a trivial gimmick.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
For $5 for the first month, if you join in a holiday discount special, you can stream over 1,700 glamcore videos of good quality. Which is a cheap way of finding out if you want to join with a membership that includes downloading privileges.
The network videos are good quality, so it seems like a bargain price to me. Except I've currently enrolled in too many porn sites to really appreciate all this good to excellent porn I'm already paying for. That's a problem that probably applies to many porn users members.
I really need to cut down on my porn memberships, and focus on the porn sites that are really rewarding.
The Pure Taboo channel at Adult Time is an excellent story-driven hardcore porn of twisted desires, one of the best twisted desire sites I've ever seen. Metart is my favorite softcore glamcore photo site on the internet.
The Wow porn network has lovely teen porn models in crystal clear videos and photosets.
I've got lots of other site memberships that are probably wasted money because I don't have the time to visit them very often.
This includes Hegre, and a bunch of lesser quality sites/networks that would be a worthwhile join, but I don't have the time to visit them very often, so I'm just wasting money on sites that I don't visit very often.
I have nothing against the XEmpire network. For $5 (streaming only), it's an OK join. But the videos don't pop off the page to make me jump with joy.
I find more erotic, more arousing videos when I browse my Xvideos.Red membership.
So I'm giving the XEmpire network a score of 85. It's a good network, but nothing special. The internet has a massive amount of porn available, from low quality to medium quality to high quality. XEmpire has good quality glamcore porn, but it's not outstanding. The models are OK to attractive, the navigation is easy, but there are better sites out there for your porn dollars.
Except $5 for one month is the price of 2 cups of coffee at a restaurant. (Or one and a half cup at some restaurants).
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-X Empire is a small network of 5 sites. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all 5 sites.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-You can choose your login details (username and password). Making them easy to remember.
-You get 2 confirming emails on sign-up. Stating your login details, and the terms of your membership.
-Customer service is 24/7, by live chat, phone, and email. Live chat responds within a few minutes.
-Navigation is easy. The sites are laid out clearly. You can sort by site, category (type of sex you want), model, or latest or highest rated video.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-X Empire is part of Gamma Entertainment, but they use a different biller, and support service from Adult Time. However, I assume the biller and support are first-rate, because it's part of Gamma Entertainment. The biller is olifehelp.
-This is a minor con. You have to login through the site you joined through. You can't login through any of the other sites in the network, or login through the main network.
-Membership can be streaming only, or streaming plus downloads. The streaming only membership is cheaper. Read what type of membership you are signing up for, which is not always made clear on the join page. I suggest using live chat to confirm whether you are getting downloads included.
-The public pages give you almost no information about the network, or any of the sites.
No sample videos, no model listing, nothing useful to determine whether the site is worth joining.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The Best Porn states there is a 300 GB daily limit for downloads.
Bottom Line:
Number of videos: around 1400.
Number of photosets: around 2200.
Number of photos per set: 140-200+
Newer videos can be streamed (and downloaded, if you have downloads) 360p through 4K.
The 4K option was added a few years ago.
You have 5 sites in the network.
-All Black X features black performers. Mainly male black on female black, but there are a few where it's solo black, or female black on female black.
-Dark X features a black guy on a white woman. But there are a few videos where you have 2 black men on a white woman.
Hard X features slightly more extreme sex. The largest site in the network, with 639 videos.
Lesbian X is a lesbian site, mainly white models.
The production values for the videos is good to excellent. The videos are crisp and clear images, good lighting, good colors. The models range from OK to very nice. But don't expect the models to compare to a glamcore site like the Vixen-Tushy sites, where the models are presented like movie stars. Even when you have the same models appearing at the X Empire and at the Vixen-Tushy sites, the models look so much better at Vixen-Tushy. Vixen-Tushy just makes videos with highest-quality production values (expensive sets, great lighting, expensive costumes, and a selection of models that ranges from lovely to fucking gorgeous).
The network has a lot of black performers (male and female).
And I like the Erotic X site, which uses a glamcore approach.
Navigation is easy.
There's advertising on every page, but that's standard for porn sites. Along with the pre-checked cross-sale on the join page.
I'm giving X Empire a score of 85.
It's a worthwhile join, especially if you catch a holiday discount.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the network sites.
-Network has 1517 movies, 779 models, 1514 photosets. Most of the models are young teens. Many are very attractive.
-Newer movies have both MP4 and WMV file format for downloads. The MP4 format has more options for definition. MP4 has a file definition for Sony PSP, iPhone3 and iPod, a higher definition for iPhone4+ and iPad and Android, then 1080p for Mac and PC, and 4K version.
For steaming, the same movie only has 240p, 720p, 1080p.
That seems like plenty of optins for both streaming and downloading.
But if you're a high-end enthusiast, you're probably going with the 4K, which is only available for downloads, not streaming.
-Regular price for the site (and network) is high:
$120/year
$30/month
But you can find a yearly price of $60/year during holiday specials.
Or $15/month if you don't want a year-long membership.
-There is a zip file for each photoset.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can favorite your favorite movies.
-Navigation is basically simple. You can list the movies by chronology, top rated, most downloaded, etc. Search engine is basic, but does the job.
CONS(START OF):
-Login is not secure. Your browser shows a popup message, when you enter your login details,
"This connection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
A poor way to reward your members who pay for a membership.
-The site update rate is irregular. They tried to update with 2-4 updates per month in 2019 or earlier, but when covid hit, the updates slowed to 1-2 per month. That's for movies. Each movie normally comes with a photoset.
Bottom Line:
X Sensual theme is young girls having sex. With a boy, with another girl, one guy with 2 girls, one girl with 2 guys.
The main draw of the site (and network) is the cute young girls. They are mainly young teens (18-19), and attractive.
They call the videos movies. There's not much plot. You have one or two girls, one or two guys.
They usually start with clothes. There's very little dialog or talking. The girl or girls grab the guy and kiss him and undress him. (There's no seduction or lead-in to the sex. You watch these videos and realize: why bother with plot: let's get to the good stuff, already. And these Russian teens go with the script, which calls for the girls and guys to strip within the first 2-3 minutes and, with maybe some kisses and touches thrown in, start to lick and suck and fuck.
The site title is "X Sensual", but a more apt title would be "Let's Fuck". Because I didn't find much sensual or teasing build-up to the sex.
You can find videos where there's more of a lead-in. That's because the girl or guy is alone, he or she is taking a shower, he or she gets dressed, and then the girl or guy shows up, they talk for a couple of minutes, the girl loosens the guy's belt, pulls down his pants, and starts sucking on his dick.
Actually, the bare-bones plots are probably the result of covid.
If you watch the videos posted in 2019 and earlier, there was more interaction between the models before the sex. There was often some seduction, playfulness, teasing, and the sex scenes were better.
The sets were better. More varied. More expensive-looking. They didn't use the cheap apartments, but apartments that looked nice, or the setting starts in a park, before they move to a nice apartment.
Instead of trying to improve the videos, the site, because of covid, was trying to save money by producing cheaper videos with low-rent apartment buildings, low-rent furniture, and using a plot where you find girls and guys having sex, instead of having some interaction between the players before the sex.
Bare-bones sex becomes boring after a while.
And the cheap sets and cheap clothes the models wear doesn't help.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
The videos from 2019 and earlier are much better to watch than the videos posted in 2020 and later. More build-up to the sex, nicer sets, they were trying to create a quality sex video, instead of mass-produced, cheap sex tapes they've been shooting starting around 2020.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main reason to join the XVideos Red site is the ability to stream and download the premium videos. With the free version of XVideos, you can't watch the premium videos. You can't download them.
-The definition of the videos varies. Many have 240p, 360p, 1080p. Or the highest definition might be 720p
Older videos (mainly 8 years back or older) might only have 240p and 360p. Or go up to 720p.
Newer videos from the last 3 or 4 years might have a 4K option.
-You get a wide range of niches. Covering many different fetishes.
-The content is almost all from pay porn sites. There is probably very little exclusive content. Not a normal pro, but the quality of most of the videos is very good. Sometimes you can see what site the video is from, other times, you can't.
-Streaming playback is good. You can fast-forward the video, and it won't freeze.
-Most videos have lots of tags, to describe the action. No text description of the plot, but a lot of videos have almost no plot, anyway.
Cons:
-The password for your membership is hidden.
On the confirmation email for your membership, they don't list the password.
Instead, you get a hot link to login to the member area.
I contacted Vendo, the payment processor. They could not give me the password for the account.
Instead, they gave me another hot link to login to the member area. I already had that link in my confirmation email.
-Most videos you see(from other paysites) are edited versions of the original video. Most videos are around 10 minutes, some are shorter. But many videos have a message: If you want to see the entire video, join the site this video came from. So I think this is a form of cross-advertising.
-A lot of people saying that much of a tube site content is pirated. But I think that a lot of the content is taken with permission; otherwise, why all the messages to join the originating site of the video?
-The search engine is excellent.
Bottom Line:
-The amount of hardcore videos is huge. Adult Time is the largest network collection of hardcore videos I've seen, but X Videos Red started as a tube site (it still is a tube site, if you're not paying a membership fee, and then it's called xvideos.com). But most videos at X Videos Red are edited videos, not the original videos. Most videos I've seen at X Videos Red are 10 minutes or less, while the original videos were 20 to 60 minutes or more.
However, I've seen some erotic movies at X Videos Red that are the complete movie.
These are mainly European skin movies, but it's a chance to see some old European movies from the 70s or 80s for a small membership price, or for free if you aren't a paying member.
Note: the search says "Search 10,546,022 videos", but that number is probably inflated. I mean, 10+ million videos?
-Not only do you get a ton of models of all kinds (ages, body styles), and the thumbnails can be helpful. I find looking through the videos easier and faster than looking through the videos at Adult Time. Adult Time is a great value for porn, you get a ton of content for a low membership price, but searching the Adult Time content is time-consuming. It's much easier to find pleasing content at X Videos Red. You're getting edited content, but you can join the originating site if you find some videos you really enjoy.
-A lot of the videos give the name of the model. Some don't, which is frustrating, if you think the model is really attractive, or the video is really hot.
-The membership price is not exactly cheap, but not really expensive, either.
$9.99/month, or $7.98/month with a yearly membership.
Although the site is huge, you have lots of categories to make searching easier.
As well as tags describing each video.
-I wonder about the definition of some of the videos. I'm watching a video that is supposed to be 1080p, and the image is not crisp and clear: it seems like the image is slightly fuzzy or out of focus. The details of the video file are 1920x1080, bitrate 2687kbps, so the dimensions should give a clear, crisp image. But the images are slightly out of focus. I'm guessing the fault is with the camera operator, who didn't bother to focus the video.
-Videos download with a generic computer-generated file name. You have to add the name of the model (if you know it), plus title of the video, plus the site name (if you know it).
-There are a lot of duplicate videos with different file names.
-Some videos require a separate subcription. So I guess the thumbnail for the video is an ad, which doesn't hit you at first: you click on the thumbnail, and wonder why the video doesn't load, then realize, you're supposed to join some other site.
-No model index. The models have no stats or bios.
Bottom Line summary:
X Videos Red is the premium version of X Videos. X Videos is the free version.
I suggest using the completely free version to see what the basic site looks like.
Then, start your free 7-day trial of the X Videos Red membership.
That should give you a good idea of whether the site is worth a premium membership.
For a low price, you get access to thousands (millions?) of hardcore videos, with downloading privileges. Covering a wide variety of niches.
With lots of attractive models.
And even though there's a lot of content that won't appeal, it's easier to find the content that does appeal, than at a network like Adult Time, where the navigation is more time consuming.
Adult Time is a fine join.
X Videos Red is a fine join.
There are plenty of fine sites on the internet, that are worth the money.
The main limiting factors are the time you have to spend, and the amount of money you can spend.
It's easy to overspend on porn, since there's so much quality porn on the internet.
But I'm very glad there is so much quality porn available at a low price.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Young Courtesans is part of the Dirty Flix network.
-network stats
1491+ scenes and growing
1487+ photosets
768+ models
-Site has a irregular number of updates: 2 to 5 per month.
-Content has a posting date.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Unusual for a porn site.
-Expired members get free limited access to the website. You will be able to see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in the member zone.
Which seems like a very generous policy.
-15 sites in the network, covering a range of niches.
-Search is good. I don't use search very much, mainly to find a model's content.
Cons:
-Login is not secure. You get a warning popup when you login that "This connection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised".
-Note: this is strange. I have my browser opened to 2 pages of the Young Courtesans website member page.
One of the pages is not secure, the other page is secure (https). So evidently there is secure web page for the site, and a non-secure web page for the site. http://members.dirtyflix.com/en/ https://members.dirtyflix.com/en/
-Payment processor is Verotel. Not as well known as other major processors.
-Login details (user name, password) are computer generated.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Videos: 164
Video runtime: averages around 25 minutes
Photosets: 164
Photoset # of photos: average 80 photos per set
photo: 2500 x 1667 pixels
I don't know why, but I think that Young Courtesans is the most famous of the sites in the Dirty Flix network.
I'm in my 70s, and my memory is poor. That's a personal problem. But all of these teen sites are starting to run together in my memory. Young Courtesans and Sell Your Girlfriend and Teeny Lovers and Teens Analyzed strike a chord in my memory. I've been a member of those sites over the years, and have fond memories of the Young Courtesans site, because I thought the models were attractive, the videos were sharply filmed, and the video quality was excellent.
Note: I posted a comment on Young Courtesans site on 10-10-2010 at the PU site.
And TBP site says Young Courtesans was launched in March 2010.
The earliest posted date for the Young Courtesans site video is Jul 20, 2013.
So I don't know if the site has deleted the earliest videos, or changed their posting date,
because the site had videos back in 2010, or earlier.
18 Videoz network and Dirty Flix network are both owned/operated by the same company.
If you want to join either one, join through the 18Videoz site or the Dirty Flix site. Joining one of the included sites can run $30/month. The listed price of Dirty Flix (and 18 Videoz) is $120/year, but holiday specials reduce the price to $60/year. So wait for a holiday special, which happens all the time.
Note: you can find a link to join at $120/year and find a different link to join at $60/year, at the same time. So use a link to join at $60/year.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They now have secure login and secure member pages. Until recently, the login, and the member pages, were sometimes secure, sometimes non-secure.
-Site updates twice a month with a new video.
-The models are young Eastern European girls, slender, white girls from around Russia.
If you're into Russian teen porn (Teen Mega World, Diesel network, Team Skeet, etc.) you will have seen many of these models at other sites.
-Many of the videos at the site are exclusive to the site. But there is some sharing with the DirtyFlix network, because both networks are managed by the same people.
Cons:
-Credit cards are no longer accepted for Young Libertines or the parent network, 18Videoz. You have to pay with cryptocurrency.
-During the year, at holidays, you can often find a price of $59.95/year, if you join through the 18Videoz.com site.
The 18 Videoz site/network has around 18 different sites, including the Young Libertines site.
So wait for a holiday special where you can join at $59.95 for 1 year through the 18Videoz site.
Note: There used to be holiday specials at $59.95/year, but maybe no longer, since they've stopped accepting credit card payment.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-It doesn't matter which definition of a video you download: Each definition of that video has the same file name.
So you have to manually change the file name if you want to download more than one definition of the file.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: young girls who sell their bodies to make extra cash.
Years ago, the site theme was young girls who sell their bodies to make extra cash.
But in the last few years, they dropped that theme, and have gone to straight porno, with no plot: young girls fucking.
Or if there is a plot, it's very simple: a girl meets a guy, and maybe they talk for a minute or two, before they start to fuck.
Even though there wasn't a lot of plot in the early videos, it did add a bit of meaning to the sex. A girl needs cash, she hooks up with some guy, and they have sex for money. So there's some meaning in how the girl and guy interact.
But the last few years, the plot is more like: Wham, bam, sex! Little to no build-up to the sex. Maybe Russians don't need a reason for sex, except being horny all the time. I wish I could meet some women like that where I live.
The models are young women, late teens or early twenties. Slender. White. Attractive to very attractive.
The videos are professionally shot. Good lighting, good sound control, nice sets.
So if you're into teen porn, this site should offer you plenty of content that you might enjoy.
I only wish they brought back the young libertine theme: porn is fantasy, I realize that, but a little bit of story adds meaning to two or more bodies slapping against each other. Even when the girls are attractive to very attractive, I want some meaning to the sex.
Giving the site a score of 85.
I don't like that the site (and network) no longer accepts credit card payment.
I haven't used cryptocurrency, and don't want to bother using it.
Would also like a bit of plot to the videos.
But the girls are attractive teens, and if you're into Russian teen porn, which is found at many teen porn sites, you've probably seen many of the girls at this site and network.
Note: both 18 Videoz and Dirty Flix networks have stopped accepting credit card payments. They only accept cryptocurrency.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Young Libertines is part of the 18 Videoz network. You get access to 18 different sites.
Note: if you join directly through Young Libertines, you pay $29.95/month, or $119.95/year.
If you join through 18Videoz, you pay (with a PU discount) $14.95/month, or $59.95/year.
Both memberships give you access to the same sites.
So do yourself a favor and join through 18Videoz.
-They have really improved the technical features of the videos. And the quality of the sets.
The clothes the models and stunt cocks wear are not expensive, but not cheap. They are regular clothes, which goes along with the upgraded videos you see at the site. The videos are now really nice. And watching a video can be very different from the older videos: it's like you're watching a video in real-life: a lovely young teen takes a shower, her hands stroke her body, slightly suggestive, but not getting into masturbation.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
She finishes the shower, puts on some clothes, a boy comes over, they kiss, and then have sex. The sex is plain vanilla; but the girl is attractive, and the sex is real, not over-the-top theatrics.
-You have a choice of streaming and downloading in low, medium or high definition. The newer videos offer a 4K definition (starting in November 2016).
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-The site is not glamour. The models don't wear a lot of make-up, the clothes are regular street clothes. But the teens are mainly fresh young teens, attractive to really lovely. The videos are
crystal clear, nicely focused, and the girls are mainly attractive to fucking yummy.
-The videos have lots of tags to describe the action. The text description is not as good, it's more generic that doesn't really tell you much.
-You click on a model's name, and links to all her video content at the network appear.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-The thumbnails for the videos are disappointing. They are small, and on the video listing, don't give you a clear picture of the model. But on the individual video listing, the photo is very large (12" by 7" on 27" monitor) and gives you a clear picture of the model. However, the flesh tones and the photo could be improved to present the model more attractively.
-It's confusing. Sometimes member pages are secure. Sometimes they are not secure. I don't think I've ever seen a site where you see mixed pages of secure and non-secure member pages.
Let me explain: if one member page is secure, all the member pages will be secure for that login.
If a member page is not secure, all the member pages will be non-secure for that login.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-18Videoz and DirtyFlix are run by the same people. A lot of the videos (and the accompanying photo sets) are posted at both networks. This increases the update rate at both networks. But it reduces the value of having a membership at both sites.
-Most videos and photo sets have a yellowish tinge. Which is disappointing. I don't know if this is due to lighting or a filter. Natural colors would improve the videos/photo sets a lot.
-Login details are computer generated.
-The photo set are screen shots. The zip file provided only has one definition.
-Slow update rate. Used to be about 2 videos per month. But has slowed to 1 video per month.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
608 Movies. So there's a lot of content for the site.
The network has 3,308 movies.
The site has 2,249 models.
You can sort the movies by newest, top rated, runtime.
Videos normally run 20 to 30 minutes.
Photo sets have around 50 to 80 photos. These are screen shots, OK to nice quality, usually nicely focused. But these girls are attractive, they really deserve a photographic record of the shoot. The level of attractiveness of the models is one of the main strengths of the network.
The low membership price ($60/year, with a PU discount if you join through the PU link to 18Videoz), plus the high level of attractiveness of the models, plus the large amount of content (over 600 videos at the site, over 3300 at the network), make this a worthwhile join.
The plots are simple or non-existent: a girl meets a boy, they go to his apartment, start to kiss, then fuck. Or a boy comes over to the girl's apartment and they kiss and fuck. Or they start in the apartment, kissing and fucking. It doesn't get much simpler than that. No elaborate seduction. Almost no foreplay. Just a kiss or two, if that much, before the get to licking each other's crotch, or sucking and fucking.
So don't expect story-driven plots. These young teens are primed and ready to fuck. Which might get repetitious, except they are young, attractive, and filled with a sex drive that ignores taboos and guilt.
I really enjoy Pure Taboo, a competing site (part of the Adult Time network), which is probably the finest story-driven site with dark sex (sex with guilt). But Young Libertines (and other sites in that network) is a nice change from Pure Taboo, filled with attractive teen girls who enjoy fucking.
Pure Taboo is higher quality in production values, and gives you a cinematic experience.
But a lower membership price makes Young Libertines an attractive alternative.
I enjoy watching attractive young teens displaying their charms.
And some of the models at the Young Libertines site and network are fucking attractive.
Note: forget the site title: Young Libertines. These are young girls that want to have fun. They are not flouting moral rules, which is what the old-time libertines were supposed to do. Flouting the rules was part of the thrill. The Young Libertine site shows girls that are into sex as a way to have fun.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 18videoz network.
-You get access to about 18 different sites with a membership.
-Epoch is the default biller, a trusted name. Easy to cancel.
-The site has a number of attractive teen models.
-The content is exclusive.
-Newer videos offer the choice of definition for low, medium, high, and 4K videos.
That is for downloading.
-Newer videos offer streaming in 240p, 720p. 1080p.
Cons:
-If you join the site directly (Young Libertines), you pay a much higher price than if you join through the 18videoz site: the 18videoz site gives you access to Young Libertines, as well as other teen sites).
-PU has a discounted price of $14.95 for the first month for 18videoz. The price for Young Libertines is much higher.
-PU also has a discounted price of $59.95/year for 18videoz. The price for Young Libertines is much higher.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The public page shows cute models in the thumbnails, but the page looks like it was designed years ago.
-Username and password are computer generated. A random mix of letters and numbers you have to write down.
-The login and member pages are non-secure. Not https. So prone to hacking.
-Some of the thumbnails, instead of loading a video you want to watch, are ads that load a new site that you can join. Annoying that the ads aren't clearly marked as ads.
-Slow update rate. One video/month recently. Was 2 videos before.
Bottom Line:
The stats are for the 18videoz network.
When you log in to the site, the stats shown are for the network, instead of for the site by itself, although you don't realize that until you check further on what the network stats are.
Trying to check what the stats are for the site, by itself, would take a lot of time and effort.
Which is different from what many other porn sites do: many porn sites show clearly what the number of videos, models, photosets are for the individual sites.
Network stats:
videos: 3202
models: 2243
photos: 210518
photosets: 2441
The Young Libertines site was launched in 2008.
It started out as a low-rent collection of teen hardcore vidoes. Although they used attractive teen models, the videos were cheaply made: No effort was made into making the models look pretty. The technical factors were poor: poor lighting, poor sound control, cheap sets (mainly rooms that look like they are run-down public housing).
The current public preview page is old and should be updated.
The main con is that the site started out years ago as a low-rent collection of teen hardcore videos.
And it's still seems like a low-rent collection of teen hardcore videos.
Although the site might have been a worthwhile join back in 2008, when it was first starting out, the site is poor choice for your money in today's world, where the porn offerings on the internet are far superior to what you will find at this site.
To make it simple:
It the content worth viewing? No, it's not. The models are attractive, but many of the videos are poor in quality because of the cheap sets, poor lighting, poor costumes, cheap video equipment.
They really need to update the site, to make the overall site more attractive, to clearly separate the newer videos from the older, lower-quality content. Otherwise, you get the impression that the entire site is a jumbled mess of low-quality porn.
The price is cheap, if you join through the 18videoz site, instead of through the more expensive Young Libertines site. But even with a cheap price, the contents at the Young Libertines site are a waste of time and money. Unless you can find some videos at the other sites in the network that are worthwhile, you will regret joining the Young Libertines site.
Although site navigation and other factors are important in scoring a site, if the content is not worth viewing, who cares if the site navigation is easy?
The site navigation is easy, but you are looking at low-grade videos that are a waste of time.
Although they have upgraded the videos over the last few years, the videos still seem like cheaply made videos. They are more like home-made videos instead of the excellent videos you can find at X-Art, or the Wow porn sites, or the better quality videos at Teen Mega World.
I honestly don't know why the videos seem like home-made, amateur videos. Unless that is the vibe they are going for.
The videos at the other sites I mentioned are so much better in quality and visual appeal.
Edit: I am slow. They are going for the home-made, amateur video vibe.
And that's why I don't appreciate the site.
I much prefer the X-Art, Wow Girls and Wow Porn style of professional quality videos.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Exclusive content. I believe the content is basically 100% exclusive. I've joined a lot of teen porn sites, and I've never seen any of the Young Sex Parties videos at other sites (except for tube sites, which seem to have a smattering of most teen porn sites in edited versions).
-Low membership price. You can get an annual membership for $60/year, with a PU discount. The listed price is $120/year.
Join through the PU link to 18 Videoz, which opens the offer to join at $60/year when you hit the join link. Or you can join for $15 for the first month, with a PU discount.
Joining the YoungSexParties.com directly, even using the PU link, shows a price of $120/year or $30/month, so don't join Young Sex Parties directly; instead, join through the PU 18 Videoz link, which gives you the lower prices.
-Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network of around 18 sites. There are no premium sites requiring an extra payment.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The network updates with 1 new video and photoset around 5 or 6 times a week. With covid slowing porn production, that's pretty good.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Videos offered in 240p, 720p, 1080p, 4K. That's both for streaming and downloads. The older videos don't have the 4K option.
CONS(START OF):
-Comparing the quality of the site/network to the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films), to the 18 Videoz network, this is defintely a step down.
The Wow network gives you a catalog of cute to lovely teen models that are filmed in high quality videos and high quality photosets. And the Wow models are cute to lovely, and would qualify to appear at any softcore glamor site such as Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy, whatever.
The models at Young Sex Parties aren't up to the Wow network standards, but they are mainly attractive. You wouldn't kick any of these girls out of your bed, if you were lucky enough to snag one.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
The sets at Young Sex Parties are less expensive than the Wow network sets. The lighting and filming and colors are not as vibrant and exciting as the Wow network standards.
Don't get me wrong: the Young Sex Parties videos are definitely watchable. It's just that they are step below what the Wow network offers.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site has 272 videos
Each video has an accompanying photoset.
Photosets average around 60 to 80 photos or screenshots.
Personally, I don't think the photosets are worth collecting, unless you're a real fan of some model, because the photos (and screenshots) are not high quality, and don't present the models that attractively, even when the model is naturally attractive.
The videos at Young Sex Parties fall under the "Reality Porn" category. The plots are basically very simple. They don't feature the stupid dialog and parody style of many porn sites. Instead, you get one or more teen girls, mainly attractive, one or more teen guys, passable looks, and they look at each other, touch each other, and start to fuck and suck. Not a lot of dialog. Not a lot of motivation, except the girls are horny, and the guys are horny, so that's the plot (internal horniness leads to sex).
I much prefer this simple plot to the stupid plots and stupid dialog featured at many hardcore teen sites.
(The Wow network gives better plots that aren't stupid. And you can sometimes catch a special discount to the Wow network for $60 or $70 per year, which a great price for an excellent teen network.)
The Nubiles Porn network also offers a ton of attractive teen models in high quality videos and photosets that are superior to what the 18 Videoz network/sites offer.
If you wait for a holiday discount, you can join the Wow network for around $63/year or $70/year (through one of their email offers, if you sign up for their weekly newsletter).
That gives you access to their 4 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films.
You can join Young Sex Parties through their 18 Videoz network for $60. Joining Young Sex Parties directly, which gives you the same access, costs $120/year.
I definitely think the Wow network is a better choice over 18 Videoz.
The Wow network content is better:
The models are more attractive, the videos are higher quality: crystal clear videos, excellent quality photosets that are worth collecting, better sets, better editing.
The price of membership to Wow network is close to the price of 18 Videoz network.
But if you have the extra money, I think the Young Sex Parties and 18 Videoz network is worth joining.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Low membership price. I joined for $59.95 for a yearly membership. I don't think this was a special discouted price, just the price I paid when I clicked on the network link at PU.
Note: when I click on the link from PU, I see much higher prices now:
$29.95/month
$119.95/year
If I had seen those prices, I would not have joined.
-Young Sex Parties is part of the 18Videoz network. So you get access to about 8 different porn sites at the 18Videoz membership.
Edit: I joined through the 18Videoz site, which includes the Young Sex Parties site.
If you join through the Young Sex Parties site, the much higher prices are what is shown. But you also get access to more sites. However, I believe the lower price of the 18Videoz is the better deal, because it gives you the flavor of the content offerings.
-The 18Videoz network advertises 3,200+ scenes, 2,246 models, 2,454 photosets.
-Edit: I don't know whether it's a mistake or not, but I see about 17 different sites at the 18Videoz network.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Which would seem to include all sites included with a Young Sex Parties membership.
So if you want to join Young Sex Parties, I would definitely join through the 18Videoz membership, which is far cheaper.
Sometimes you come across sites which have different membership prices, and the cheapest membership gives you all the privileges of the higher priced memberships. It's just sloppy marketing, but it happens.
-Young Sex Parties has 255 movies. So it's a fairly large site.
-It't still updating. But at a slow rate. One new video per month. But you have a large site, and access to the rest of the 18Videoz network, which includes over 3,000 videos. Plus, the network advertises daily updates. However, many sites or networks advertise daily updates, and don't deliver.
I think this is because they maybe did offer daily updates, and when they stopped, they didn't change the advertising/description to reflect the current reality
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
I've seen many sites that still advertise update rates, that is not currently true.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
Edit: I rarely download any more. But I don't see any notice of a download limit. And The Best Porn states there is no download limit.
-I believe the content is exclusive. I've never seen the content duplicated at any porn site, except for the tube sites, which seem to sample almost ever porn site I've ever joined, even content from MetArt, if you can believe. Not the MetArt photosets, but the MetArt videos.
-Downloads are offered in MP4 and WMV formats.
-The videos stream smoothly. No buffering problems.
-You can view the photosets online, manually, or as a slide show.
-I believe the photosets are screencaps, but good screencaps made from a good software program.
The photos are OK to good quality, but I wish the quality was better, because some of these girls are really cute. Note: almost all the girls are attractive to really attractive. These are real teens. Not thirty-year-olds trying to look like teens.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Login and member pages are non-secure. So easier for hacking.
-I wish the thumbnails on the video listing were larger, so I could see the models more clearly.
-I also wish they put the name of the model(s) on the video listing, so I could tell who the model is more easily, rather than needing to click on the video to bring up the video itself to see what the model looks like.
-There are ads for other sites, in large thumbnails, but in my current mood, I can ignore them somewhat, but I'm always looking for cute models, and sometimes I click on the ads to see what the site is (that's being advertised), and what the models at that site look like.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Young Sex Parties theme: Going to a party, having sex. Very casual sex. Not a lot of romance or build-up.
Categories: Amateur, Anal Fingering, Anal Sex, Asian, Ass Licking, Behind The Scenes, Big Boobs, Big Cock, Bisexual, Blonde, Blowjob, Brunette, Cream Pie, Double Penetration, Fetish, Foursome, Group Sex, Hairy, Handjob, Interracial, Lesbian, Masturbation, Mature, Outdoor, POV, Pornstar, Public Fucking, Redhead, Small Tits, Solo, Squirt, Teens, Threesome, Toys, Voyeur
Movies: 255 currently.
Both MP4 and WMV formats are offered for download.
Videos download in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
The models are real teens. Cute or attractive. From Eastern Europe, I assume.
Most of the videos I've seen have no subtitles, but who needs subtitles when most of the words I hear them speaking are "UUUUUhhhhh, AAhhhhhh, GGGrrroooannnhhh, UU, AA, uuunnnn, (choking sounds as she's sucking a dick).
Some of the sex parties videos are not real parties, but just a boy and girl fucking, or two boys on one girl fucking.
Or some other combination of one or more boys, and one or more girls.
I would say the site features bread-and-butter sex. There is little build-up, everyone knows they are they to put on a show, and they start to have sex. Vaginal, anal, cock sucking, slapping the girl's ass, with lots of moaning and groaning from both the girls and boys. Usually, most porn, it's the girl who is moaning and screaming, but at this site, the boys are equally vocal.
I'm afraid that in my current frame of mind, I get easily bored by straight fucking. I much enjoy plot-driven sex to add some meaning to the sex. Or maybe some nice costumes or nice settings.
Here the settings are plain: not cheap, but not expensive. Just an ordinary room or bedroom, with a couch or bed where the action takes place.
I must say, the girls really appear enthusiastic about sucking dick, and getting fucked.
And the stunt cocks are good or excellent. You've probably seen them at different porn paysites, because, while I don't know their names, I've seen over a hundred videos at Teen Mega World and the Wow sites and elsewhere, featuring some of these stunt cocks. And the stunt cocks still look like teens, or at least in their early twenties, even though they've been in the business for years.
Starting Feb 17, 2017:
Free access for expired members
From now on all expired members get free limited access to our website. You will be able to see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in your member zone. If your password stopped working you can reset it on login page or ask our support for help.
I think that is a fine offer. I'm still an active member, but even if your membership expires, you will still be able to access the sites, and see all the picture sets, plus some other features.
Bottom Line: If you are satisfied with plain bread-and-butter sex, this site (and the network) should prove a good choice. You get, for a very low price ($60/year for the 18Videoz network), a ton of hardcore teen videos. I'm giving the site (with network access) a score of 85.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
