Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
151
|
Trystan Bull
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I will readily admit, I was expecting a big, muscular, brawny guy. He’s good-looking and it’s not just gay scenes. He’s not big, muscular and brawny.
These gay solo sites seem to have more of the type of material I like and this one has some. Though, the use of the word “solo” in gay porn is different than straight porn.
It has 110 scenes, and the downloads are unlimited.
Some of these guys make me wonder how “gay” they are. Which goes into the content I like.
Easy to cancel, uses a version of Gamma’s billing. |
| Cons: |
There’s a distinct difference between the gay, bisexual and solo scenes. The gay scenes are not good even for a straight woman. This guy does not seem like he’s into gay sex.
Scenes are too short, a lot are under 20 minutes.
Some of the categories don’t make much sense – non-nude and softcore? |
| Bottom Line: |
The name Trystan Bull makes me think of a large, muscular, bald, powerful man. A+ for the Marketing Team. Trystan is an average sized guy that looks like he could maybe be an extra in a Marvel movie. I don’t know if the compliment shows in that. He is handsome. He has that superhero actor look.
The site is one of the most confusing gay sites I have ever been on. There are 15 scenes with women. There are 28 solo scenes too. That’s nearly half of the site’s scenes. Trystan seems to be more into the women than the men. And it has one scene that I think would be perfect way to blend porn for gay men and straight women. Trystan is looking through a gloryhole at a very muscular man who is masturbating. That wall between the guys keeps some of the gay parts since it’s two men and it keeps them just far enough apart that they are not as obviously gay for the women viewers. These 43 scenes with women, solo and this one gloryhole scene really helps the score of this site. If I was more attracted to Trystan, the score would be even higher.
There is bad news: The scenes are short. I think one was over 30 minutes. The rest are under 20 minutes and some are close to only 10 minutes. The ten oldest scenes also only have 240p and 480p downloads. The rest have everything up through 1080p, but no 4K. The picture sets are okay, but you can’t download those.
The good news besides the HD videos is the women are really pretty. Which also leads me to wonder about how much Trystan is more into women. Usually when you see a woman in a scene with a “gay” man or bisexual men, they can be pretty, but are usually average looking. The women on here, at least one, I think is a big star. And most of the women look like they could be stars themselves.
I do like the way they film the solo scenes. Some sites do the male solo scene in the least visually impressive way with the guy sitting on a couch or recliner. Trystan’s solo scenes include outdoors, on the porch of a house, it could be a major difference in female and male solo scenes. I want to think I could just accidentally walk up on a guy masturbating. While, I think the female masturbation scenes try to give you the feeling of the female invited you to watch her. Trystan’s have that more spontaneous feel to them.
I am going to score this site higher based on how much I liked the 43 scenes I pointed out. It seems like porn anymore is more about finding scenes you like instead of just taking a chance. To add what I was saying about the difference between solo male and female scenes, the solo male niche doesn’t seem to have anything to do with “solo” except every scene features the main star. It could be with other people. I know from my first porn site job ever, Nubiles, about 12 years ago, solo female porn means masturbation. Just when I say that they’ll change it on me. Good site if you like the sound of the 43 scenes I described. |
|
12-08-21 02:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
152
|
Manko 88
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Uncensored Asian/Japanese porn that is quite good.
Small site with only 30 scenes, but it does get two updates per month.
Some of the scenes are really outstanding including in length and depth of the scene (see cons).
Video quality is excellent with up to 1080p on all videos, all are downloadable.
Downloadable zipped photos that are of high quality 2700x4000
Some threesomes and outdoor scenes too. |
| Cons: |
The scenes greatly vary in length and how interesting the scene is. The longest scene is 67 minutes and five are over 60 minutes, but there are others in the 15 minute range. The depth of the scenes (kinkiness and actions) varies because of this.
One of the first times I’ve watched Asian/Japanese porn and have to say this needs subtitles. One of the scenes is called, “Mother-in-law hungry for cock”. There is so much dialogue going on in the scene, but I have no idea what is being said. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is worth a look for those interested in Japanese porn without the censoring. All of the males in these scenes are not Japanese. I have an interest in Japanese porn from reading reviews about how creative it is and how much of it relies on a story. That clearly is happening in some of these scenes, but without even a basic knowledge of Japanese, I have to just go by the context of actions. I do believe this is going to sticking point for me with this site. While each scene is titled and tells me what the scene is about, there’s not even a synopsis. All of the scenes have the same synopsis that tells you what to expect from Manko88, not the scene itself.
There are only 30 scenes, but there are 2 updates per month and each update comes with a video and photos. The videos and photos are downloadable and from what I can tell it is unlimited. Something that has held back my interest in Japanese and Asian porn is the use of creampies. Based on the very good user features, the niches dropdown box says 23 of these 30 scenes have creampies. I am sure creampies are common in real sex – Covid has me in a drought, but I don’t get the use of creampies in porn. This is performance sex not husband and wife trying to make a baby sex. Cumshots are and always have been one of my favorite parts of porn.
The video quality is good enough though I don’t see any with 4K. They do offer 540p, 720p and 1080p. Which is good enough for me, but maybe not for those wanting 4K. The pictures are 2700x4000, I am not technological enough to know if that is telling me they have the cameras to make 4K videos, but that’s not a dealbreaker for me.
Some of the scenes, like the mother-in-law hungry for cock have what looks to be a sexy story. The son-in-law has the mother-in-law’s panties and is sniffing them. The mother-in-law sees him from a short distance, but out of his sight and starts masturbating watching him sniff her panties. I don’t need the talking to get that part. It then turns to dialogue and turns into sex. There’s so much being said that would either add or take away from this scene, but it’s gibberish to me. I do like the site and the longer scenes. There seems to be quite a lot of taboo going on in these scenes. I would even say a few are more extreme like a black man helping his Asian male friend get his girlfriend off with an array of Magic Wands, threesome sex and what I wouldn’t expect from a Japanese site.
There are cutesy scenes with the pretty Asian models wearing cat or bunny ears (I’m from Chicago, I don’t know animal ears). There are scenes with the female models nude in public. One of the female model having a guy use a dildo on her in the car while driving around which leads to a blowjob and cum in the mouth. There’s a lot going on here that I like, but I really get the feeling this could be even better if I had the slightest clue what they’re talking about. I like the site overall, there’s good video and photo quality and no censoring. I did try a Japanese site with censoring a few months ago and couldn’t even review it. I’m not porn-adapted enough to get around the censor mosaic. This site fixes that problem. It is worth keeping an eye on. If there was more balance from scene to scene, at the very least a synopsis explaining everything or subtitles, this site would score really high for me. It still is considering I have no idea what’s going on besides the sex. |
|
10-19-21 01:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
153
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the Dogfart Network of 23 Interracial sites
Updates once a week
You can rate each scene.
Four download options. The best is Full High Definition
The site has some of the hottest black men in porn
Some of the best natural chemistry I have ever seen
More than 1000 videos |
| Cons: |
Costs extra for download option for 4K
Older scenes are not in HD |
| Bottom Line: |
In my opinion, interracial sex pairs those of any two races, however, in porn it generally means black men and white women. This site has that, but not only blond women, but also white women of all hair colors, as well as black men with Latinas and also Asians. The site also touches on a few specific niches, such as large men and petite women, as well as some scenes are older/younger. Some scenes are gangbangs. The contrasts are often sharply drawn and very striking to the eye. I saw a scene with Cindy Starfall, who is tiny at 4’10 and whose partner Mandingo has a 12” penis. Seeing it in her mouth was just incredible and oh so memorable. I love contrast in porn and this is about as good as it gets in my opinion.
In most porn today, the women have the star power and are the major focus. Let’s face it, the guys are pretty much interchangeable. In some porn, they don’t even get billing and you never get to know as much as even their names. In some types of porn, for example, Point of View, you may never even get to see their faces.
The guys on this site include major black male models. Some are so well known for their scenes that they even have their own websites. This site has a lot of stars that have a large following, such as the legendary Lexington Steele, Sean Michaels, Prince Yahshua, Wesley Pipes, Shane Diesel, and Mandingo. These men are very, very dark and have penises that can only be described as huge, maybe even the biggest in porn. I don’t think they make condoms this size. If you read pornstar interviews, the female models often mention these guys as among their favorites to work with as they are kind as well as considerate sex symbols for many women. These female models are seasoned professionals who are among the most popular. I have seen them before on other sites, but I feel that here many of them have their best scenes. I don’t know if it is the size or the color of these guys, or maybe both, but something works well here. One of my favorite scenes, for example, stars Cindy Starfall, who has some of the best Jerk Off Encouragement as well as overall sexy talk in her oral sex videos. On this site her face just simply lights up from the first glimpse at these penises and their size. Suddenly the talkative becomes speechless. She must have seen quite a few penises in her life and she should know an outstanding one when she sees it. A few of the stars that I really like are also here, such as Esperanza Del Horno, Eva Angelina and Gina Valentina.
There is a chemistry in these scenes that is a hallmark of interracial porn. I think that both the men and women are on their best behavior and give performances that show how they feel about making these scenes. Far too much porn is repetitive and by the numbers dull, but these come across as the performers finding a natural attraction. I personally don’t care that much that they are of different races, but I do care a lot that the models look like they love doing this kind of sex scene.
It is mentioned on the site that they have won numerous XBIZ and AVN awards, the porn version of the Academy Awards. These are given by their peers in the industry and show how well made the scenes are. You see an attention to detail that is outstanding, from the makeup, to the camerawork, to the lighting and of course the direction. I don’t know if there are classes for learning how to make good porn, but these videos would be great as teaching tools.
The sex itself is straight to the point and there is no real storyline. Mostly what you get are more like simple scenarios such as going to visit your boyfriend. He is not home but his brother is. The woman is a stripper at a bachelor party. The woman is interviewing men for a job as her bodyguard. Many of the scenes are three ways, many four ways and some are even more. The site is easy to use, with one new update per week. There are no download limits mentioned and I did not hit any. There are an incredible more than 1000 videos and photosets, but the frosting on the cake is the access to the rest of the Dogfart Network. You have a similar site, but age focused, called Blacks on Cougars, an interracial lesbian site Zebra Girls, two gay interracial sites as well as a few sites that are rare in porn, featuring black women and white men. |
|
10-19-21 12:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
154
|
Bums Bus
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of Lets Doe It Network
Uses a trusted biller
The site has 134 videos.
Sometimes silly but still fun.
Attractive stars that I am not familiar with |
| Cons: |
Needs more subtitles
Download limit of 100 videos per month for the network
Has not updated in almost three years |
| Bottom Line: |
I have never been a member of a site that is not in English, so I was not too sure what to expect. Well, sex is not about talking, so I kept an open mind. As part of the Lets Doe it Network, I joined for a few sites that seemed promising, but this was not one I had thought about, to be honest.
Some of the videos have subtitles and it was not hard to imagine that the scenes where there were none were probably very similar. The guys joke, kid around and in general act silly, like college students on a break. The videos even have a feel of being produced by amateurs. Your average scene shows them driving around in Berlin, looking for women to entice into either showing some skin or, if they are really lucky, she has sex in the van. The showing the skin idea was that they would offer money to see her breasts.
When I was a college student, I felt college guys were not very mature. Now, I felt the introductory parts were like a film about the college guys themselves and the women were to be seen as conquests. Because the videos were overly long, I found that I skipped ahead to the sex parts as that is what I was there for. I thought the scenes were rehearsed and not spontaneous and it was hard to imagine myself as the woman. The scenes that started off in public were just ok. My two favorite scenes had the tables turned and had a woman cruising the streets for guys to pick up. Although I could never do that myself, it was a fun fantasy that I could relate to.
I don’t know anything about German porn, so I don’t know if the women were amateurs or pros. The guys were about average looking and seemed to be of about average size down there. The cumshots were ok, not huge or anything exciting to watch.
The site is easy enough to use and there is a tag system for searching. There is a monthly limit of 100 videos for the network. They have 134 videos but when you see the download limit of 100 per month, I prefer to keep those from the other network sites as opposed to these here. For me the other big negative is that the site has not updated in nearly three years. I would not join for this site alone. But, the rest of the network is an astounding value. |
|
10-19-21 12:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
155
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of the Reality Kings network, it’s a very large MILF site.
815 scenes, each scene includes a photo set and 35-45 minute video.
If you add-on downloads the majority of scenes are available in 1080p or 720p.
Scenes vary between woman in control, man in control.
Overall, good production values with many of the scenes having some funny dialogue and setup.
If you’re not into downloads the streaming player works well. |
| Cons: |
Downloads cost extra, $15 per month for them and the download upgrade does include photo sets.
Too much clutter, ads, upsells
Site stopped updating on June 12, 2019. |
| Bottom Line: |
Milf Hunter is a hardcore site about a man on the hunt for Milfs to have sex with. That’s how it started; they eventually went to a format where there was a different man in nearly every scene. The sex is common hardcore, blowjobs, doggystyle, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, cumshot.
Despite the site no longer updating it is still one of the biggest Milf sites available with 815 scenes and each of those videos average around 40 minutes. There is a playful nature to a lot of the scenes including light exhibitionism, car flashing and some scenes starting in public locations.
I think the downloads are worth it for a month or two. They have good quality videos with nearly all having HD (720p or 1080p) download options and I haven’t run into a download limit. Maybe they removed the limit once you’ve paid for downloads? The photo sets are screen captures and can be downloaded with the download upgrade. It’s still a worthy site for those into the Milf niche. |
|
01-27-20 07:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
156
|
Joy Mii
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A pretty porn site where the models are all pretty and have a natural look.
Smaller than I expected with only 193 models, but they are 193 very pretty models.
720 video scenes and for some reason, 719 photo sets. All are downloadable and excellent quality.
I think it's important to stress how pretty and natural the models on here are. I haven't seen any implants and if there's tattoos, I've just missed them.
They have solo, lesbian and hardcore scenes.
Updates twice a week.
It has been around for a long time. I guess it's why I expected it to be a bigger site, but this could go into quality over quantity. |
| Cons: |
I didn't realize this is a softer hardcore site. A lot of the scenes in this softer hardcore genre just come off as generic to me and that is just an opinion.
It needs more variety. The scenes have these gorgeous models in them and it's like they're the sexy part and the sex is just the bonus.
The scenes are just straight to the point and short. Some are less than 20 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
My pros/cons might look like I don't like this site, but it's not true. This is a good, very straightforward porn site with some really gorgeous models in hardcore action.
The site has been around for almost 10 years, so they have only averaged about 70 videos and 70 photo sets per year. What I find myself running into here is I find I model I really like and they only have a couple scenes of her, while other models have 10+ scenes. That is subjective to my taste, but it doesn't help me enjoy the site.
These are all professional models as far as I can tell. They look familiar and there are even a few big name models.
They have 350 male/female scenes and some of those are threesomes. The other 370 scenes are lesbian or solo. There's no way to separate the solo from lesbian scenes.
The navigation for the site works well except that they list solo and lesbian together. The model list isn't the most friendly, it is a vertical scrolling page with one model per section. Clicking on any model brings up a list of her scenes and photo sets.
The video quality is one of the brighter spots for the site. All videos have 1080p, 720p, 540p, 270p all in .MP4 and a 720p .WMV version. The streaming player works very well.
The photo sets have three downloadable versions, quickview 534x800, collector's edition 800x1200 and poster size 6000x4000. That's a big difference and the file sizes show it. The first two were 8-12 MB each, the poster size is 400 MB. These are photo sets, but they could pass for screen captures as they are from a video scene.
I would compare the site to Sex Art, X-Art, and just about any site with the word Art in it.
Whether my tone has sounded negative or not shouldn't go against the site. I am just a little disappointed in what I was expecting. It not a bad site, but I also don't think it's a great site. |
|
11-26-19 12:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
157
|
Sex Art
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A Met-Art inspired site about sex. Hardcore, lesbian and masturbation.
Male and female models are very attractive.
The site works as it should. There are no gimmicks or tricks required to understand.
Big site with 1,550 photo sets and 1,178 videos.
The site updates each day.
Not the best way to find out this pro, but after a cancellation mix-up, their support staff fixed it (within 24 hours) and added a month to my membership at no cost. |
| Cons: |
Potentially the most unheard of con -- it does not feel like porn. It feels like I am watching a one hour drama series that slipped a sex scene in.
I think the extra month of Sex Art was also because of my complaining about the "staff selection" releases. These show up in the regular updates and require you to pay separately for each one. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was hesitant to join Sex-Art. I am not into the more hardcore, kinky content (usually), but I had seen a few samples from their site. The samples were what I would describe as plain, vanilla and when I watch porn, I expect more than that.
It is hard to look over the content since all of the models, male and female, are attractive. The problem I see is it does not feel like I am spying on a couple having wild, passionate sex. I feel like they invited me to evaluate their performances. I am not a seasoned expert in hardcore porn. There is a reason I prefer solo or lesbian scenes. I like the added intimacy of solo porn. The lesbian scenes, as I have alluded to in previous reviews, shows me what I always heard happened in college, but never experienced it.
A nice looking guy and nice looking female having sex in positions I have had sex in is nothing exciting. I do like those scenes, but they are not going to turn me into a fan of hardcore porn.
The lesbian scenes are not much different than the male/female scenes. They look like professionals having professional sex. Our minds like to believe porn is dirty. It is not dirty on Sex-Art! Either the male/female or female/female really like each other or they were paid a good amount of money to make me believe they really like each other.
The solo scenes are very good, and that was my complaint I sent Sex-Art when I had the cancellation problem. I saw all these solo scenes in the staff selections, including titles like, "My Favorite Fetish", "Turning Myself On", "Watch or Watched" and "Raw Orgasm". There are almost 50 of these types of scenes in staff selections. They all sound like scenes I would really be into.
They are $4.99 each for members. I am not new to online porn, but I am new to this style of selling someone a membership then expecting them to pay more for your premium content. I paid $5 for the Sex-Art membership. Why not sell it for $25 and include those staff selection videos? Obviously, 50 x $5 each is a lot more than $25, but as women start joining porn sites, the porn producers are going to realize we are more into bargains and thinking we are getting something more for our money.
I would not feel the separation between the regular Sex-Art scenes and the staff selection scenes if the Sex-Art scenes did not feel vanilla. I bought one of the staff selection scenes, titled, "My Favorite Fetish". I would not pay $5 again for one of these scenes. First, it was only 16 minutes. It was a solo scene, it was not that unique. The model has a hose or stocking fetish. She inserts her stockings inside of her and then sniffs and licks them while she masturbates.
It left me feeling like the site is not as great as it thinks it is. I still believe it is a good site and would appeal to others more than it did me. Their quality is excellent it is just not a site I would normally join. I should have looked more into it before joining, but for $10 including the staff selection video, I do not feel ripped off.
The pros covered the large amount of content and the site works very well. I have joined other sites listed as female-friendly. I do think it is disambiguation to call it female-friendly. All that has meant on the sites I have tried is it is very soft hardcore. Are they saying it is friendly to the females in the porn? I don't believe that. I believe it is marketed at women that want to see their favorite erotica book brought to life. They even have erotica-like synopsis of the scenes.
These are from one of the most recent male/female scenes, "she emerges from the pool with water dripping down her voluptuous body". Another is, "She frees his rigid cock" and ends with, "Her orgasm is wet and explosive as they slam together and she jerks out his load rapidly, both of them gasping for breath from their exertions."
That is not porn. That is from the minds of my middle-aged, unhappily married friends, put there by the stack of novels in their bathroom. Maybe I need to try a more hardcore site. With all my complaining and bitching, it is still a very good site if this content appeals to you. I do not collect pictures. I think that probably hurts my view of the site too.
It lingers way too close to cheesy for me. |
|
07-16-19 01:19am
Replies (1)
|
Review
158
|
BJ Raw
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I was first introduced to by Adult Time. It is “raw” blowjobs.
Not a big site but does have 62 scenes and most are long considering the niche is limited. It updates once per week.
If you like women rimming men this site has that in nearly, if not every, scene.
Video download quality is up to 4K with multiple options.
Pretty models, that is one part that surprised me for this niche.
The guys are well above average endowment and the women put every inch to full use. |
| Cons: |
I have joined a few blowjob-focused sites in the past and keep thinking there will be more than just regular suck, to and from head movements and there is, it’s rimming. Which I am not into. They could easily add a different variation in some of the scenes.
Anything I say is going to come off as “being too critical”. Are there not enough scenes of sucking, to and from movements and rimming? There’s more that leads me to try sites like this one. Maybe they don’t realize this is going to become repetitive? |
| Bottom Line: |
I admittedly get frustrated with sites like this one. The video quality is very good. Besides 4K, they have 1080p and 360p. They also have downloadable photo zips that are pretty good. Those resolution options may not even please some people. The newer scenes replaced one of the two versions of 1080p with 4K. The oldest scenes have 1080p in two bitrates, then falls all the way to 360p. Am I thinking too much? They have the 720p for streaming. I don’t see the point of having 360p if you’re not going to have 720p. It says mobile, but my cellphone is 1080p.
The frustration is more about the content. These scenes are about several things. One, to show how pretty the woman’s face is. It’s very close to a POV-style video. The second part is to show what the woman will do besides blowjob. There’s ball sucking, ball licking and probably deepest rimming I have seen. The models’ pretty face isn’t near as pretty with two balls on her forehead and a mound of body hair wrapping around her face. That’s mostly what you will see during that part. She then switches to blowjob and shows how far she can go before gagging. The women are good at blowjobs. The biggest compliment I can pay the man or men, is that there’s a constant erection and it’s above average.
The scenes are longer than I am used to in this niche. Some are around 30 minutes even. That’s a long time to watch a woman bury her face and stretch her throat. I have been told many times in my profession, not to complain, unless I have a solution. It’s pretty easy on this site. Does no one in porn use edging the dick? Does no one use vibrators on the frenulum of the dick? Add some teasing, do something different. You could tell me the name of the site is BJ Raw, I should expect blowjobs. There’s as much rimming and playing with the balls as blowjobs. I like this niche. I would like to see it try and advance a little. I won’t name the Blowjob site, I first encountered with this niche, but it has 20 times the scenes this site has and has the woman doing as much as these women do. This site looks like it’s trying to be a niche site that draws people from a certain fetish into it. They’re not doing anything that different than any other full hardcore site. I do believe they could change that.
There are only around 60 scenes, but it is updating weekly, and the models are generally very pretty. The settings are better than you get in normal porn scenes. It moves around throughout the scene. The setting can even start outside then move indoors. It feels like they are going in the right direction, but they turn back around and just do what is expected. If anything about porn has worn on me, it is the feeling that I am watching the producer’s fantasy. That’s fine if I am, but I shouldn’t be paying for someone else’s fantasy. Switch it up a little. I would recommend watching it on Adult Time. I did take the upgrade offer to it. I have a year subscription to Adult Time. They seem to send me these partner offers about once or twice a month. I should have looked more into the actual BJ Raw site before agreeing to join it. I had one of those turn out to be a very good separate site.
This one is not bad. It is repetitive. One of my most watched niches is this one. I like seeing the nude man. It just doesn’t do enough to make me see the word “raw”. I thought each scene would have some variation. I don’t know how men feel about this part. I noticed it in a lot of these scenes. The female twerking. I’m as tired of that as seeing the same 3 actions happening in blowjobs. I’m giving it what I would call a slightly below average score. There is a lot more they could be doing with nearly 30 minutes per video. Maybe someone will get a laugh out of this. I felt like pushing the woman’s head back while she was doing the rimming and saying, “I think it’s clean enough!” Spit, polish and shine. |
|
03-08-22 05:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
159
|
Bel Ami Online
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gay site that has a lot of solo scenes.
Some familiar faces especially Sean Cody, but I didn’t know a lot of these guys.
Not quite 1080p on the newest video downloads, but close at 950p (never seen that before)
Averages close to a daily update.
Around 3,000 videos and nearly 800 photo sets.
Navigation is good enough. |
| Cons: |
The ongoing problem for females watching gay male porn: Most of these guys fit the “gay” category. To put that bluntly, the guys are not that masculine. I will even pay a compliment that’s not a compliment to me – pretty.
This is one I didn’t look into enough before joining, lots of uncircumcised guys and I believe that’s more common with European sites, which this site is. It’s just not my “thing”.
I have seen mentions of a daily download limit of 20GB, but I don’t download that much so I can’t verify it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have said it before, being a female, trying to find porn of solo men is becoming more and more difficult. Add to it that the male needs to at least be masculine and it’s just not very common. This site adds the uncircumcised guys and I’m mentioning that since I know some people love that. It is just making it more difficult for me to find porn that I genuinely enjoy.
The good news is Bel Ami Online has over 1,000 solo scenes. I will even add some perspective to this, when I was 18-22, I probably would have loved every guy on this site. As it is, being around 40 now, a lot of these guys are just way too young and innocent looking. I have the same problem with looking at young females in porn. My favorite site years ago was Nubiles, but it is no longer a favorite site just because I don’t feel right looking at the very young women on it. I am sure there is some production and planning magic at work. It’s like the young females with bobby socks on. They’re playing to the youth of these guys. I do have a problem with that with both genders. I just don’t like it.
I have no idea what they are going for with the download resolutions. The scenes I have downloaded are 816p and 544p, I’m not the most technically strong person, but why the odd resolutions? It’s not a big deal until I see the numbers. They do have a good update schedule. It’s close to 1 new update per day. They have a large back catalog of scenes with over 3,000 videos. The photos are not near as good as they should be. This site is reminiscent of glamour female sites. There should be more focus on the pictures. They can’t say much since they do have zip downloads and recognize the importance of pictures. The ones I downloaded are 1137x774. When was that ever standard or even 1200?
The navigation works good enough, that just means I click the tag for “solos”. One part that continues my belief that they know how important photos are is that some of the videos are photography sessions. Just throw the video out on those. I pay to watch porn not to watch someone take photos. Even with the solos tag, you still get “couples” mixed in! The number problem on the resolution combined with solo and couples’ tags showing up on the same scene, makes me think they can’t count. There’s one or two. Solo. Couple. It can’t be both. I will admit that the site is probably really good for gay men. The guys are mostly slender or muscular-lean. I do believe the landscape of gay porn and rising popularity of it is making the gay solo scenes that much more difficult for straight women to like. There is some butt play and showing their buttholes off.
Overall, for a gay man, this is probably a top 3 site. The models are pretty for guys. They’re in shape. Nice bodies if you’re into that. I prefer the masculine, some body hair, a little beefier build. These guys make me think they’ll steal my vanity mirror so they can fix their hair. They do need improvement in the photo resolution and figure out what’s going on with the video resolution. The videos look fine. It’s why I said the resolution listing is throwing me off. I would compare this directly to a gay male version of Nubiles.net There’s just not much excitement or as others have said heat in the scenes. It’s stoic and kind of dull for a middle-aged woman to watch. I won’t let my biases play much of a role in the score. I am going 80 on it just because they could have a lot better pictures and I don’t like the photography session videos. The other is I just don’t feel any passion in the scenes. I have watched the solo and a few of the “couples”. It’s going through the motions porn. Definitely good enough to recommend for those that are more into just what they see. That’s probably the high point of the site, especially for gay men. |
|
07-09-22 10:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
160
|
Southern Sins
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The name of the site threw me off course. This is an Australian site.
Some really good voyeur-style scenes.
The site has 43 scenes and is updating twice per month.
Here’s you a pro/con depending on the person, pubic hair and hair in other places too which I will go into.
There are photo sets that are downloadable and high quality, but only 32 of those.
Video quality is very good, but no 4K. |
| Cons: |
The pubic hair probably isn’t a turn-off for most, but there’s body hair I have read others complain about – underarm on the women.
Scenes are way too short and there are behind the scenes videos mixed in. |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the first things I thought when checking this site out was Atlanta (my sometimes home), Miami (wish it was my full-time home) and I was thinking like an American – not to mention, stereotyping. I was expecting a site based on stepfamily porn from southern states. I am a regular user of Australian sites like Abby Winters and Girls Out West. I don’t know why the Southern name is in there. I didn’t study much geography.
My first thought when looking at the models was there are some really pretty models on here. One that really stood out to me is one I know from other Australian sites – Ruby Valentine, she’s one of my favorites even. I don’t know if I have just missed it on other sites, but she has full, black, underarm hair on this site. I am not going to say that’s a turn-off for me, but will say it’s not a turn-on for me either. Being of fair-complexion, I don’t have a lot of body hair and it’s just not something I’m used to seeing on women. I don’t mind her pubic hair at all. I believe pubic hair on darker complected models is sexy.
That seems to be the basis of the site. It says it showcases people celebrating themselves and life. There are some interesting scenes I have never seen on other sites or if I have, those other sites made the scenes look contrived. For example, there is a scene titled, “Yoga Lesson” and it’s 6-7 women outdoors, nude, doing yoga. Where it kind of falls flat is there’s no sex at all in it. It looks like 6-7 real women just doing naked yoga in the wilderness. Is there a big market for “porn” like that? I get the part that says this could be a fantasy for someone to walk up on a group of nude women doing yoga, but they are seriously doing yoga and not just doing it for preparation for an all-out, wild orgy.
The solo scenes are probably my favorite scenes on this site, aided by Ruby Valentine being in a couple of those. I watched the behind the scenes videos just to see if maybe those were the BTS videos that are interesting. I’m going on the side of personal preference, I didn’t find those very interesting, no more than I would a Netflix documentary on new-age therapy. Maybe the variation in scenes offers some value and interest? There are scenes (I typed sins) with voyeurism, but just a few. One of the niches I would like to see more of has a scene of it on this site. A guy standing at the door, masturbating, while watching a couple have sex. I really believe that’s a niche that is way underused in porn. It could even be a woman standing at the door, masturbating, while watching a couple have sex. That’s an element I don’t think porn producers these days think about. Us that are watching it are like the person standing at the door. I would make a whole site of that niche.
I do think the site is worth checking out especially if either of these parts interest you – Ruby Valentine (she has 5 solo scenes on here that are all great) or hairy porn interests you. Maybe that should be called “natural” porn? Seems more marketable to me. The sex is believable. The videos can be downloaded at 540p, 720p and 1080p. The photo sets can be downloaded as well, but I do believe if Ruby Valentine and hairy doesn’t interest you, you may not like this site as much as I do. |
|
10-19-21 01:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
161
|
Full Porn Network
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A 16 site network of sites that are mostly rough and anal-centered. Would that be analcenteric?
Most of the scenes have 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K video download options.
The network has updated 9 times over the last week.
Pretty models in about 80% of the scenes.
Well-known models even for me, but there are some amateurs.
Mixture of male/female, threesomes, group of men with one woman.
Photos and screencaps can be downloaded. The photos include pictures of just the female. |
| Cons: |
This one was not on my list to join, but I decided to be open-minded and try it. It's probably time to stop opening my mind.
The James Deen site seems to be the dominant site here and the newer updates include old scenes on it. I think that's also a con for the network since those are shown as network updates.
The amount of lube they go through. They must have something like a 55 gallon barrel of it.
More implants than I like to see. I don't mind the tattoos as much.
Do they put the cheapest mascara on the women to get it to run down their face like that?
Scenes shared between the sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
A lesson in being newer to joining sites outside of my safe 8-10 sites I like, don't have multiple sites open when deciding which to join. Despite joining this on what I'm going to call an accident, I'm going to try and be as fair and as objective as possible.
I would have listed all of the sites included and listed how many scenes they each have, but there are several sites on this network that just have scenes from the other sites on them. The site DTFSluts has scenes from James Deen and Analized on it. The site Your Mom Does Porn has scenes from at least 4 of the other network sites. I'm not looking to give them any extra credit.
The whole network has 1,699 scenes. When I had added them up going by each site it was over 3,000, that should add some perspective to how many scenes they are sharing between their sites.
There are some scenes I liked. It seems like the older scenes are not quite as "me, caveman" as the newer scenes.
The quality of the videos is good except for the random 720p max scene they throw in. The oldest scenes on the network have 4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p. The photos are also what I think are studio photo sets, they are small, but those focus on the female model before the scene starts. You get to see how pretty she is before the scene ends. Maybe that's a porn conspiracy? Women that watch this porn are not going to be willing to do these acts. The models go from 7-10 to 1-3. Some of them look like they got drunk and decided to stick the big end of the wine bottle up their butt, fell asleep in that position and woke up with a hangover and a 4 inch diameter wine bottle in their butt.
I know there is a market for this type of porn. There's nothing wrong with that. I admit, I laugh and heckle the small dick porn sites like on Pure CFNM.
Which is what the guys on this network remind me of. They were once laughed at by a woman and now it's their turn.
There are various disclaimers and warnings on the videos. I didn't think the actual sex was that hardcore for the disclaimers to be needed, but it seems to be more about the treatment of the women. The most common disclaimer talks about consent, probably should say, "We didn't tie this woman up and fill her with roofies."
Some of the sex is quite good. Some of the women look like they could have added 3 more guys and they wouldn't have cared. There is a light at the end of the tunnel, I really tried to work an anal joke in, the site Big Daddy POV has some solo scenes for jerk off instruction. I thought those were good and those work just as much for women as men. Though I do think they go overboard with this site's production values. Most of the models are dressed in pink, in a pink bedroom with little glittering lights behind them, some are hugging their teddy bears. I can see a site like Nubiles doing that since their models look 18-19, but some of these models on Big Daddy POV look in their 30s.
Maybe the most important part to know and it's why I also reviewed the James Deen site is more than 50% of the total videos come from the James Deen site which kind of deflates that 16 sites included sales pitch.
If you're really into the more dominant male style of porn you'll probably like this. I'm not even against dominant male porn. I just thought they could have executed everything a little better. Bringing moans into screams with any sex act can be very arousing. Bending a woman's arms up to the back of her head, slapping her, maybe even a few eye pokes in there, trying to fit your dick and fist in her at the same time is just a little too much for me. |
|
04-26-20 02:35am
Replies (1)
|
Review
162
|
James Deen
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Straightforward, gonzo style porn featuring James Deen.
846 scenes with new scenes added regularly, but not on a set schedule.
Photos, screencaps and videos can be downloaded.
Videos go up to 4K, some oddities in the video quality specifications.
Mostly rough sex if you're into that.
Blend of scenes which will be in cons too. Male/female, threesomes, casting, etc... |
| Cons: |
This seems like some kind of best of James Deen site. There are scenes from other sites and other studios and scenes from JamesDeen.com. This causes the next con.
The video quality varies from scene to scene. Based on user comments some of the scenes are very old and are being "found" one comment says, "Great find", it is one of the newest scenes released, but tops out at 720p.
I was only a little familiar with James Deen. The scenes are as much about him putting what looks like wrestling holds on women as sex.
Navigation is poor. |
| Bottom Line: |
I once read an article about James Deen being porn's "boy next door". I remember the article well. It talked about how women loved being in scenes with him because he was gentle and so nice.
So, what happened? You know you're going to get a scene that might be harsh when it has a 20 second warning before the scene starts that explains everyone in the scene is a consenting adult, no one is being forced and people watching should not try this at home. In one scene, he has the woman's arms pulled up behind her back while bending her over a sofa.
It's not that the scenes are bad. It's more like a feeling that you know what's going to happen in every scene. She's not going to moan enough from the sex so he's going to bend her arms behind her head or slap her.
He's really not as obnoxious as I expected. It does seem like he gets off on the woman feeling pain, but other than that, it's very basic and straightforward sex. He really doesn't look big enough to seriously hurt anyone. I just was expecting some of that content of the "boy next door". It's more like the guy you picked up at the bar.
There are tags, clickable model names and that's the limit of the navigation. The site could be put together better. It looks like the most time spent was on the terribly written scene descriptions like, "He continued fucking her from behind as he pull her by the hair and neck. Halfway through it, he pins her down and gets power fucking to the next level. It may be a rough fucking for Sadie, James was nice enough to lick her fuck holes from time to time." That is about 1/8th of the scene description.
The biggest problem is the scenes are from different sites. I even saw one from Bang.com and it says on it, "Exclusive Bang.com scene" on James Deen's site. This does make the quality of the scenes vary throughout the site.
The time of the scenes also varies greatly from 19 minutes to 55 minutes. If you like James Deen and like rough sex, especially anal, you would probably like this site. For me, it's an okay site with some good scenes thanks to the women in the scenes.
You can download videos, photo and screencaps. The video quality is hard to describe or list since they are blending in James scenes from other sites. One of the newest is with a model that has bios up saying she retired in 2014. Maybe the Coronavirus is causing them to bring in these scenes from other sites?
You could do worse than this site, but I think your odds would be just as good to do better. |
|
04-25-20 09:36pm
Replies (7)
|
Review
163
|
Beach Hunters
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It's like watching everything that goes on at the beach!
Public exhibitionism, voyeuristic, with a lot of content of 100% amateurs.
More sex than I thought there would be.
They have over 6,500 videos and 125,000 photos.
CCBill takes your money to the site.
The updates don't seem to be scheduled, but when they update, they post 10+ videos and hundreds of pictures, those come several times a month. |
| Cons: |
There's nothing here that you're used to on porn sites. No model list, no search box.
Camera problems, a lot of the videos are shot from a distance that you can see everything, but not anything that clearly.
Short videos, it's probably part of the niche. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was becoming frustrated and even bored with the glossy world of mainstream porn.
I was watching a scene on a tube site where a "wife" was getting suntan lotion rubbed on her by a stranger. The stranger decided she needed some suntan lotion on her parts covered by her bikini. I found it oddly erotic. I don't think I ever thought about beach porn.
The site is easy to use which I was not expecting. It looks like the last time they programmed it was before the internet was created. It's instead really easy to use and I kind of find the colors to be pleasant to my eyes. There are no ads anywhere on the site.
You have these choices:
Sex on the Beach, they have 1,005 of these scenes.
Nudism, they have 4,441 of these.
Then, 514 topless, 48 changing room, 334 foreplay and 119 not straight. That's how they have it listed. I found that a little confusing since I knew what it likely meant (gay), but thought maybe it meant the camera angle was off center. It is an amateur site.
This is very easy to use and find what you're looking for, but I won't go too far on the praising. When you click, "Sex on the Beach", it opens a page of the 18 newest videos. There's 56 of these pages.
I liked that they list the "author", but after watching enough scenes, I realized the "author" is the person filming it not one of the people involved in the scene.
The sex scenes are good, but I think it's because they're in public and you can hear the ocean washing in. The part I felt most disappointed in was the cumshots. Some of them use condoms and cum in the condom. Other times the guy jumps up, woman on her knees in front of him and all you see is his hairy back since the camera is behind them. When you do get the right angle on the cumshot it's one of those where the distance makes it nearly impossible to see. You have to go more by the woman's reaction.
I do get the feeling most if not all of this is filmed on nude beaches. The nudism videos have multiple nude people walking around and besides just seeing someone nude and unaroused there's not a lot of sexual energy in these.
The videos are downloadable in 720p, so they are good quality. It's just that distance that causes a problem with seeing the action. It kind of feels like I'm wanting a professional porn studio to go shoot these scenes with 3-4 cameras.
This is a community site and it has a forum for members to post in. I'm not really for sure what to think of it. One of the downsides to having a forum is it shows disgruntled customers. There are numerous posts about archives of content disappearing. There also are hardly no new posts on it. I only see one from 2020 and 6 from 2019. I will confirm they are adding content.
It wasn't really what I was looking for. I think I should maybe look for bikini/beach porn filmed with the camera closer, but it's not a bad site for seeing some surprising beach situations. If you're like me you might get frustrated with some of the content. Like 7 minutes of the guy and woman talking (you can't hear them), then 2 minutes of sex. Did they just have 9 minutes of video to use? It's probably rare content and I'm sure that makes it appealing to someone out there. I'm giving them an 80 for at least having 720p video and they do have zip files for their photos. Some of these look like aerial views. |
|
02-17-20 07:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
164
|
Teenrs
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Teen network that includes 5 (small) sites featuring a specific niche on each site.
It's different, I really thought I was going to have buyer's remorse, but the scenes are quite good and I ended up liking it.
Unless I am counting wrong, I'm counting 145 scenes on the entire network of 5 sites, but want to add, I downloaded 50 of the scenes.
Videos have 540p, 720p and 1080p options, there are screencaps, but I haven't found a way to download them.
Most of the videos are long, averaging 45 minutes each and most involve more than two people. |
| Cons: |
Four of the five sites haven't updated since 2016 and the one that is updating, hasn't updated since November 20th, 2019 (more than two weeks ago).
There are good ideas here, there's creativity, why stop producing this content?
It wants to upgrade me to a very large, confusing network with 14,000+ videos, but doesn't tell the price. |
| Bottom Line: |
If I had to pick a favorite niche in porn it would be CFNM. They have a site here called CFNM 18. I knew it was going to be a small site, but didn't know how small. It has 14 scenes on it. They are all very good scenes and will be saved with my other CFNM videos from other sites, they are creative, they scenes are long with a couple lasting over an hour and they're exactly what I like in CFNM. The last update was in 2016.
I also like the sites where games are played, strip poker type games, the various naked twister type games and they have a site called Spicy Roulette. I was looking forward to see what they could do to make a roulette wheel sexy and there's 12 scenes on it. These scenes are good, they are fun, and these are major group sex scenes which I really don't see a lot of anymore. The scenes on Spicy Roulette feature as many as 3 males and 5 females, you'll have two or three women riding the men and two of the women tribbing in the distance. Very sexy scenes.
They have a site called My Dr. Feelgood, which is the medical niche and it's one I like. It has 10 scenes on it. These are good and again, very long scenes in the 45 minutes range. It just feels like someone had a busy year in 2016 and decided to stop filming porn.
Next is 18Dom, which is a pretty sad attempt at domination porn as 18 year old female models are "dominating" men. The scenes are not bad or believable. The models in all of the scenes on this network are very pretty and like the other sites I've listed so far, this one has long videos in the 30 minute range. The domination is about as believable as the number of scenes I'm going to say, it has 13 scenes on it. These kind of remind me of CFNM scenes except the models end up nude. It's mostly soft "physical violence" like a 90 pound woman forcing the man down.
The last site in the network is Club Exclusive and it is the one that updated on November 20, 2019, it has nearly 100 scenes on it, but there's something to note here. These scenes have the Club Sweetheart watermark on them so they are from Club Sweethearts, they're pretty good scenes overall, there's creativity, some even have a CFNM type feel to them, there are handjobs, even a couple go into the strip games, so I guess it works as a good way to preview Club Sweethearts.
The other four sites are generally better than it as you can tell those sites had a lot of thought put into their scenes. If those first four sites had around 50 scenes on each, I would score this network very high, but instead, I got around 50 scenes total and nearly all came from those first 4 sites. All wasn't lost as I've joined a few sites where I don't download anything.
If those 4 niche sites interest you and you find a good deal like I did, it might be worth it to join and grab the scenes from those sites. If those niches don't interest you, I don't think you're going to be too happy or impressed with this tiny network. I felt like an 80 is a fair score just based on the content on those first 4 sites being very good. |
|
12-02-19 11:57pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
165
|
Bi Maxx
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Male, male, female bisexual scenes, groups and orgies.
It's a narrow niche that usually fails to deliver, but Bi Maxx is the best I've seen of the niche.
Over 350 scenes, I can't give an exact number as will be explained in the first con.
Standard for the times, 480p, 720p and 1080p options to download.
The best looking models (male and female) you will see in MMF bisexual scenes.
Includes access to Sinx's sample videos from more than 20 sites. |
| Cons: |
Bi Maxx was easy to navigate the last time I was on it (2016). It's now filled with the most confusing navigation I've seen on a site.
No update schedule, I didn't download any videos from here in 2016, so I don't know how new these scenes are.
Expensive €29.99, about $32 in USD. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bi Maxx offers a niche that could be confusing to some porn fans. Usually when we hear of a bisexual threesome we think of two women with a man, but Bi Maxx has two men with a woman. There's a unique, but also formulaic feel to these scenes. I'm not a porn producer, but I would think you have to get a certain amount of time with the woman having sex with one or both men, time with the men having sex with each other, role (top and bottom) being flipped and there's the confusion of who is going to take the cumshots.
Bi Maxx has a distinct advantage over the two other bisexual men sites I know of, they are owned by the same company that owns Tainster. They have full access to a stable of beautiful female models and many of them appear in these scenes.
I know looks are subjective, but most bisexual male scenes have an average looking female in them. Some of the females in these scenes could easily be A-list European models. I have reviewed several Tainster sites and one thing all have in common is the acting ability. These females seem to be very aroused by watching two men have sex with each other. It's not uncommon in this niche to see women that look bored or even uninterested.
The video quality is very good. There are photo sets too.
Then, the problems start. Sinx is either the new owner of the Tainster sites or it's just a name Tainster is using to signify a change in direction. They have videos (usually 5-20) from other paysites that have no direct connection to them or the content you bought.
The very first time I joined "Tainster" it was called EroMax, Bi Maxx was included with the sites that you now get with a Tainster membership. Now, Bi Maxx has been removed from Tainster and requires a second membership.
You click videos and see the typical porn site page with 15-20 videos, click a button to see more, click a number to go to the next page and you find yourself with several hundred scenes. The confusion returns. There is a section called "channels" it has what to me are 48 DVDs or themed series. These have between 2-4 scenes on each one. I can't tell if these are the same scenes on the videos page. It shows one picture. There's two naked guys and a naked woman, many of them don't show their faces and they don't list their names.
Want some more confusion? When you click on one to view it, it says you have to pay $2.99 to view it. This is a complete mess. The Tainster site works well enough on Sinx, but Bi Maxx seems to be their version of a money pit. Have we reached that part of porn's era where supply and demand will control the pricing of rare niches?
More so than the Tainster videos, these videos being European filmed and featuring European actors and actresses show a major problem with the language barrier.
If a man and woman are having sex you really don't need a story to understand why they are having sex. Even a man, female and female. Then, you watch these scenes and one of the men looks like he's not into it. Why? I can't understand what he says. The acting is good enough in all scenes Tainster films to make it where you can read body language. Could they maybe put subtitles? Or explain what the channels section is for?
One last part on the channels section. They are named just like the Bi Maxx scenes, like, "Bisex Party: Always bet on Bi" but I have to pay extra for those? I'm giving it an 80 for the quality of models, filming and feeling I could give it a 60 for being so damned confusing. |
|
10-14-19 09:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
166
|
XFeeds
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
If potential had value; this would be a very good porn site
Five sites are included though seemingly unrelated
Very good first month price
Downloads are unlimited
Videos do include 4K downloads |
| Cons: |
It’s underwhelming as a network with under 1,000 total scenes
The site I was most interested is very small (My Dirty Novels) |
| Bottom Line: |
I was not going to join any new sites this month, but saw the site, My Dirty Novels and thought it sounded unique and interesting. It is unique and interesting, but the content from it is very small and updates are very slow.
While this is a network and I believe it’s good to be advertised that way, the sites are almost all small in quantity and it’s really just Slim 4K with 4 very small sites added. Over 80% of the content is from Slim 4K. Keep that in mind if considering a subscription. You are effectively joining a slim niche site. One of the other sites also follows the Slim niche, My Tiny Wish.
The included sites are Slim 4K, My Tiny Wish, My Dirty Novels, Dud Cast and Doc Squirt. Slim 4K has nearly 500 scenes while the other sites are all under 100 scenes.
For the most part, the content on all the sites is good, but is nearly all standard hardcore, which goes against My Dirty Novels. It’s a site that has a real-life couple who bring in a third person to their relationship and video it. That’s far from a fully unique idea, Teen Fidelity and Porn Fidelity come to mind as bigger, better options of this same niche, but My Dirty Novels has the advantage of amateur models.
The quality of the downloads is very high, and the site works exceptionally.
It's just not enough variety and far from enough quantity. You would need to be a huge fan of Slim women porn to get any value out of the network.
The potential I see is if the sites on the network were somehow linked. Having a model appear on Slim 4K then having her feature in a scene on My Dirty Novels. It might not be as good as I think it would be, but it would give the network something different.
I don’t regret joining but doubt I will ever join again. The price of $10 makes it worth the risk and the scenes on Slim 4K are probably worth the $10 price. I just don’t think it’s a good join for the average porn fan. There are other sites that do this type of porn and have larger catalogs of content. |
|
09-18-23 06:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
167
|
Pride Studios
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gay network of 11 sites.
The network averages 3-4 updates per week.
As a whole, there are 5,047 scenes and 890 male models.
The scenes over the last few years have up to 4K downloads.
There are pictures that can be downloaded. |
| Cons: |
Really poorly named sites that do not offer what the names of the sites say.
Less than 100 solo scenes across the entire network. |
| Bottom Line: |
I only felt one of the sites from this network deserved its own review and I will admit, it is because I not only prefer solo gay, it is really the only gay porn I can get into. This is a good network for gay porn. It’s not that good for straight women looking to get in on the naked men part of gay porn.
The site names could be the most misleading part of the network. One of the sites is named Circle Jerk Boys. It has 1,055 scenes on it. Of those 1,055 scenes, the categories show 45 scenes with masturbation and 4 scenes listed as “orgy”. There are no tags for “group” or “circle jerk”. And looking at the scenes, all I see are ones with two guys having sex.
They weren’t done there. They also have a site called Boyz Party. Looking at the categories on it there are no tags for group or orgy and it lists 3 masturbation scenes with 0 solo scenes. I can see 8 solo scenes on the first page. As professional as everything newer on the network is, these other sites seem to have been left out of the professionalism. The Boyz Party really looks like it could be a good site, it’s just none of the tags or categories are right on it.
The other sites on the network would be good choices for gay men. This network seems to be focused on the gay relationship, love, romance and there are even stories in the scenes. There are plenty of handsome guys on Men Over 30, Extra Big Dicks and I found the Pride Originals to be interesting. It has interviews and the sex scenes are scripted. Sometimes, I think scripted could be better for porn.
Compared to most of the gay sites I have joined, the quality of the videos and photos is much better on Pride. I really could be running into a wall where I cannot relate to what gay men like. Are gay men really that different in sexual interests than straight women? I’m basing that on it seems straight men and lesbians like the same things when it comes to women.
I would recommend it to gay men. I would recommend it to straight women if my separate review for Men Over 30 sounds good to you, but if not, I really believe this network is for gay men. It’s possible even the Pride word being in the title could be telling us that. |
|
12-08-21 03:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
168
|
Next Door Raw
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gay site that involves bondage, domination and some impressive bodies.
Updates once per week, the site has 375 scenes on it.
Most gay sites are going to interest me with solo scenes, this one has 0, but this does seem to be a different take on gay porn than I’m used to.
The newer scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and mobile versions of the downloads.
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are as many aggressive gay porn fans as straight ones. |
| Cons: |
The realization, after reading scene comments, there are some gay porn fans completely disgusted by the idea of a woman watching gay porn.
The titles of the scenes read like poor Erotica quotes, “Cum Breed Me”? Really?
Tries way too hard to establish dominance and submissiveness without using real human nature. There’s a therapist inside me. |
| Bottom Line: |
More so than any other site on this network, this one is filled with combative comments from the members, and it reached the level, for me, of making it unappealing. This reminds me a lot of the Kink Men sites. These scenes are the most creative I have seen in gay porn and there is the establishing a role which you rarely see in porn. The first problem for me was there are no solo scenes. Reading the comments kind of made that clearer to me. There were a lot of comments about wanting to see real gay chemistry in the scenes. That’s not going to happen in solo gay porn. If gay porn fans are having problems enjoying scenes with multiple men having sex, they probably don’t enjoy solo men either. That’s why it hard to find solo gay men porn. I guess I need to branch out to transsexuals.
The scenes on this site almost all revolve around establishing a role. There is bondage, there is even physical dominance and you get the ones with the guys who like being the submissive and I can only think to say, those scenes are cute. It’s cute watching a man be submissive and seductive. I did notice the one solo model I liked a lot was receiving a lot of hate. Maybe I’m sensing that he’s not really gay and the gay fans don’t like him. This site does show some of the technological advances of the network. Most of the sites I have reviewed on it are not updating. This one is and it is once per week and they have up to 4K on the newer scenes. It just looks like gay solo porn has died.
These scenes have some appeal to me. Some of the guys are very attractive and I think the roughness and aggressiveness of the scenes are shooting those testosterone levels up and you’re getting to some very impressive erections. I don’t have as much interest in how the scenes play out or end. This is not good porn for a straight woman. The scenes I watched showed more of a love/fascination with each other than I am used to seeing in gay porn. I’m not for sure if that’s what gay men want either. I know that I like softer hardcore in male/female porn, but I don’t have interest in seeing the male and female seem fascinated with each other and in love. I will recommend this site to gay men. I won’t to straight women. I will also it has made me think twice about gay porn unless I know there are solo scenes. There are only so much nice bodies can cover. Some of these guys are more obnoxious than the straight guys that we normally associate with being obnoxious. Not my cup of tea. |
|
12-08-21 02:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
169
|
Black Meat White Feet
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great download speeds that are at my maximum.
Comes with 23 high quality interracial sites on the Dogfart Network
The combination of two unusual niches, interracial porn and foot porn makes for a rare, maybe even unique site.
Uses Epoch as a biller and you can pay with Paypal, as well as any of 100 gift cards.
Easy site navigation and excellent download speeds.
PU has a discount |
| Cons: |
A small site with only 56 updates.
4K costs extra per scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
We on Pornusers have very few reviews for foot focused porn sites. The scenes have a variety of sex acts, including oral, vaginal and anal. However, the scenes use the female model’s feet for foreplay, as a break from other sex acts, as well as for the cumshots.
The scenarios vary and use themes that are common on other pornsites. A good example is a recent update where a mother, Kay Carter, and her stepdaughter Percy Sires, are the female talent. The mother teaches her stepdaughter how to be sexy with her feet. The male stars are black and well hung, of course. Prince Yashua is one of the most prolific of male black pornstars and he is accompanied by Donny Sins as the recipients of the female attention. The premise here is that the stepdaughter got into a car accident and does not have the money to pay for the repairs to the other car. Her stepmother makes a deal for foot sex in this fantasy scene.
This site has many big name American pornstars such as Aidra Fox, Kenzie Reeves, Shona River, Brooklyn Chase, Riley Reid, Casey Calvert, Veruca James, Chastity Lynn, Kagney Lynn Karter, Eva Angelina, Remy LaCroix, Darcy Tyler, and Giselle Leon. The male models are some of the best black male stars in the business. Leading the group is Rico Strong with 11 scenes, Brian Pumper with 9, JonJon with 8, and Prince Yashua with 6. All of them are simply huge down there and the contrast in color with the white models is striking.
The video download choices are Full HD 1920x1080, 10,000 kbps and 30 frames per second, HD 1280x720 4600 kbps and 30 frames per second, Medium at 768x432 and Small at 688x384. Despite 4K being mentioned in other reviews as available for an extra fee, I saw no mention of this on the site. A recent photoset had 243 photos, 3000x2003 and there is a mix of portrait photos and landscape screenshots.
One criticism I feel is valid is that there are only 56 videos, despite the fact that the site has existed since 2011. That is not much for a ten year old site. In the past few years, it has hardly updated at all. So far in 2021 there are only two. In all of 2020 there were only four. Often sites die and go archive when models are difficult to find. I am no expert, but I can’t imagine models being unwilling to do a site that focuses on feet. The scenes are pretty much sex that you find on most sites and are not extreme. This is far from circus porn that would wear out a female model.
The site navigation is easy and is very logical. You can search by model, by site, by network or by tags. I found the download speeds to be at about the maximum my computer is capable of.
Pornusers has a discount for a monthly join. Epoch is the biller and it is one of the best you can use. Through them, you can pay with Paypal, as well as using your choice of about 100 gift cards.
Between a nice discount and the network having a huge archive, I recommend that this site is worth checking out if you are into feet as sex objects. |
|
10-19-21 12:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
170
|
POV Blowjobs
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As far as I am willing to go into the world of messy, rough porn. A large POV blowjob site.
Surprising to me, 674 scenes, remove around 40 if you don’t count behind the scenes.
It’s part of the Evil Angel network. I tried to find a few more sites to review from it, but can’t stomach most of them.
Some really pretty women. Why does that surprise me?
Good video quality with more than half of the scenes having up to 1080p downloads.
Downloadable picture zips, but some of the sets only have 10 or less pictures. |
| Cons: |
This does not remind me of a blowjob site. It’s more like a throat culture site, very messy, harsh, I won’t say degrading since the women seem to enjoy it.
No longer updating, but it is a very large site.
One of my most hated acts in porn: Having the guy cum into a glass for the women to drink it. It reminds me of when Rocky drinks the raw eggs. |
| Bottom Line: |
I believe I pushed every boundary I have with these reviews this month. I tried Anal Acrobats, but couldn’t even make it through the trailers of the videos to review it. This one is typical of Evil Angel and some of it’s not terribly disgusting or offensive, but some of it is. I am going to review it as objectively as I can without bringing too much of my disgust into the review.
The majority of the 674 scenes are one woman with one man and those are not that bad. It’s the scenes with more than one man that I found hard to watch. Maybe I should even say, if you are against very hardcore porn, heavy slobbering, running eyeshadow and eyeliner, gagging noises, you might want to stay away from this site.
This is a legitimate complaint that has nothing to do with the disgusting parts. I don’t see how this is POV. Especially when it’s more than one man. There’s one camera and five men. I’m not even for sure where POV for a blowjob should be recorded from.
The most surprising part to me was how many very attractive women there are on the site. I even saw one scene here with the very pretty Anissa Kate. The scenes are very simplistic. Man gets naked, the woman opens her mouth and the man gives her a throat culture with his penis. I really believe if they spent more time working on making it a true POV site, instead of seeing how close they could come to choking the woman to death, it would be a good site. Which is me being objective. I’m saying if you don’t mind the sounds, the gagging, you might like this site a lot. The part that made me at least suffer through watching the scenes was how much the women seem to enjoy it. There is a little more to the scenes than just blowjobs. Many of the female models masturbate while giving the blowjob. I would even recommend it for those who have favorite mainstream female porn stars. You will be surprised when you see her on this site. |
|
08-11-21 05:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
171
|
Deepthroat Sirens
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site on Top Web Models that doesn’t just have blowjobs, which is strange since the name of the site sounds like it would be all oral.
A large site with 478 scenes and some very cute, younger female models.
Very long scenes, some nearing an hour each. The videos are downloadable with no limits.
The picture sets are some of the biggest (in quantity) I have seen with some having 700 photos. They are also downloadable.
There are other sites included that I feel are better overall than the sites they focus on. |
| Cons: |
Probably not for the newer porn viewer. There’s gagging, choking, some degradation.
The download speeds on the biggest video files are very slow compared to the download speeds on the smaller files. I can’t even differentiate between the different options since the file takes too long to download.
The photosets are also way too large to download. |
| Bottom Line: |
I decided to let this review kind of be for the whole network since this site seems to be the flagship site. If you can’t tell, I didn’t like this site very much. Most of the scenes start off with the guy seeing how far he can stick his penis down the woman’s throat. This includes forcing her head to hold in position, even if she’s gagging and I’m just wondering how I ended up joining a site like this. I was looking for something different. It’s different, but not the direction I was looking for.
They have a site called 2 Girls 1 Camera that I really liked. It is rough too, but it includes scenes with one woman masturbating while watching the other woman and the man have sex. It looks like they were on the right track to creating something fairly unique, but it only has 31 scenes on it.
Deep Throat Sirens with 478 scenes of all forms of sex. There’s anal, there’s vaginal, there’s a lot of choking and gagging too. I realized after joining this network, thanks to Deep Throat Sirens, I was thinking I was joining Net Video Girls.
There are technical problems too. Deep Throat Sirens also lists their two top video download resolutions as 1920x1080, but one is twice as big as the other. I have learned about bitrates and thought that’s probably what the difference is, but when I go to download the “Original” it is 4GB and it downloads at 3.5 MB/s. When I download the “HQ” it is 2GB and also listed as 1920x1080, it downloads at 40 MB/s. When I download the photo sets, some of which are 2GB, it downloads at 40 MB/s. I don’t know why the Original is twice the size of the HQ even though their resolutions are listed as the same. They also offer a 540p and 270p download too. The tagging system does not seem to be accurate. They have 72 tags, but some of them don’t seem like they should be tags like two different ones for “pig tails” and “pigtails”. Or the ones that I don’t see the point of like, “Halloween”, “Christmas”, “Valentine’s Day”. There’s a feeling that they are trying to do too much, but not doing any of it that well.
The network as a whole has 1,258 models and 1,870 scenes so it is a good-sized network especially for the price. It’s also not all oral, besides Deep Throat Sirens having all forms of sex on it, the site Big Gulp Girls also has more than oral even though it’s another one that is named like it should be just oral. You see what I mean by trying to do too much? The sites that sound like they may have more than oral only have oral.
I should also mention the older videos including all the videos on three of the sites only have 480p as the highest download resolution. I am going to have a hard time recommending it to newer porn viewers. Some of the scenes on Deep Throat Sirens are more hardcore than anything I’ve seen on Evil Angel or Kink. I would recommend it to those who are into rougher sex and would even highly recommend it since it the size of the network is good for the price. Maybe the tech problems will get worked out and that would also help my view of it. I am just getting the feeling I’m on a network that there isn’t much attention being paid to it or it’s maintenance. There still is no way to know if it’s updating. I can say the newest videos showing up haven’t changed in the 2 weeks I’ve been a member. |
|
03-10-21 01:18am
Replies (1)
|
Review
172
|
Love Hairy
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site with 469 "hairy" models
More explicit than other sites in this genre, masturbation, girl/girl scenes and fully spread photos.
1,142 photo sets and 169 videos, all are downloadable.
Tagging system that can help you find models with similar traits as the one you're looking at, I even noticed a tag for "painted nails".
The majority of the hairiness on this site is in the pubic area. Some other hairy sites include hairy legs and hairy underarms, I haven't noticed any of those. |
| Cons: |
The site is newer, but some of the content is 19 years old. The layout is a modern layout, but those older photo sets feel like I'm looking at vintage porn.
While there are videos they are not that common and there's no set update schedule. They had 4 in October and November 2019, combined. Before that they only had 3 in the previous 9 months.
Small in quantity photo sets, some have as few as 20 photos in them. |
| Bottom Line: |
I find myself on the fence when it comes to hairy content. I think the biggest reason is too much pubic hair makes it hard to see the action (if there is any) that's going on in the pussy area. This site focuses more on women with hairy pubic areas than full, complete bushes. The content is mostly softcore, but there are usually 3-5 explicit photos in each set. The videos don't really feel like the belong on the site and I'm guessing they don't. Some of them credit Viv Thomas as the producer and look like content from 2006-2012. The videos are more explicit and even include lesbian scenes.
I like this site for including more explicit shots. I've joined several of these artsy sites over the last few months and I needed one to show me it was still pornography and not just women standing around naked. The explicit poses on here are even very good, done in what I would called "sexually provocative" ways.
I notice some big name models mixed in here that I think are now retired. The life of this site makes it seem like there should be more content. Maybe it was down or dormant for years?
The models are attractive and some are top-level in looks. I don't think "hairy fans" will think the content is hairy enough. A lot of these models have trimmed pubic areas.
The 1,142 photo sets can be downloaded as zips and will be the main focus of most members memberships. A better, more frequent and consistent video update schedule would help. It's a good, but not quite great site. |
|
12-08-19 08:47pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
173
|
All Wam
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I liked Slime Wave so much I decided to try All WAM (Wet And Messy). It's a unique niche I hadn't seen before.
Comes with the Tainster Network and the add-on content from Sinx.
The models are a lot like the models on all of the Tainster sites, very attractive, European, usually slim and they are believably turned on.
Could be a great find for those with clothing and wet clothing fetishes.
Scenes are titled like, "Fully Clothed Bath Buddies". This network as a whole is impressive with their different niches.
Close to 500 scenes, 2 have been added in the last 6 weeks.
Older scenes followed a Wet And Messy theme, but some were mud wrestling.
The site works very well. |
| Cons: |
Some of the scenes are tens -- others, the models don't seem to be as into this as on other Tainster sites.
I haven't seen one scene with a man in it.
Video quality isn't consistent. "Older" scenes have HD and True HD, while some "newer" scenes only have Standard Definition. |
| Bottom Line: |
I liked Slime Wave so much that I expected to like this one just as much. Some of the scenes I do, some of the scenes just get too messy. It gets to the point that you can't even see through the see through clothing.
Having been a member of Tainster in the past I still get the feeling they have removed older, less quality scenes. With nearly 500 scenes there isn't much to complain about.
On the majority of the scenes you can download 1080p, 720p and 480p. Some of the oldest scenes only have 480p and 360p options (there's not many of these).
All of the scenes have photos you can download.
One of my biggest complaints is there are no men in the scenes. It seems like a naked man or a clothed man getting wet and messy would add to the niche and add more depth to it. Most of the scenes are two women and those are the best ones on the site. It looks like two women just don't make as big of a mess as three or more. Once they have three or more it becomes hard to even tell which model is which.
The best way to describe these scenes is to say -- a woman in clothes, or panties, is going to either get water or pudding or milk or some kind of liquid poured on her. The women then rub the liquids in on each other from their head to their toes. You can look at the beginning outfits to tell which scenes are going to be best. The ones with white t-shirts or white pants or white blouses are going to be showing a lot of see-through parts.
This is the part of the review that will either sell you on the site or turn you away. There's not a lot of sex in it. There's not even a lot of nudity in it. If you are into women touching themselves over their clothes or being touched over their clothes this site does that a lot. There are parts where the women start groping each other after 15 minutes of no touching. It gives it a believable feeling of them becoming aroused.
I liked that part for the sake of it being different than what I'm used to seeing, but if you require nudity then you might not like this site as well as their other sites. There were a few where I wanted the women to get naked, but they didn't.
I think that's a situation where you have a site sticking to their niche too well. The whole focus here is getting the women wet and messy.
I did notice the differences in download quality as well. One of the first scenes they have listed doesn't have HD or True HD option. Four pages in, every video has HD and True HD.
It's a good site in a niche I didn't even know existed. Some of the erotic parts with the touching over clothes are very sexy, but most of the scenes drop off too much from the no nudity and no sex.
It's worth checking out if you are a member on Tainster, but I wouldn't recommend it as a standalone site. |
|
09-10-19 12:38am
Replies (0)
|
Review
174
|
21 Naturals
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site with only one on one male/female scenes.
Scenes are broken up by niche/name, they are 21 Naturals, 21 Erotic Anal and 21 Foot Art.
Attractive male and female models.
Production values are above average unless you consider story part of the production values.
There are 4K downloads over the last year and 1080p prior to those.
I have not seen a tattoo or a set of implants on the site.
917 scenes, but they haven't updated since January 2019. |
| Cons: |
This type of porn is very dull and plain to me.
The scene titles make you believe there is a story going on, but if there is it is well-hidden.
Now that Adult Time has taken over there is no way to search just for models on 21 Natural. If you go to a model's page it shows you all of her content on all of the Adult Time sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site reminds me of Sex Art. The models are very attractive. The settings are nice and fit the modern vibe of the content. That seems to be where they stopped.
Sites like these are hard to review and hard to be too critical of or too enthusiastic about. They do a good job of sticking to their naturals theme, but the scenes lack everything except sex. Maybe they were going for natural equals no stories -- just sex?
I'm not for sure how hard it is to find someone to write a little story with dialogue? The stories seem to be based on that is a man, that is a woman, they are horny, watch them have sex.
The quality of camerawork, lighting and person that opens the window to let natural wind in are all very high and consistent. The closest they come to a story are in the 21 Foot Art scenes.
They have 917 scenes, but their updates seemed to just stop for no reason. Between December 1st, 2018 and the first week of January 2019, they had 16 scenes, then those updates stopped.
You can download in 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and the scenes of the last year have 4K or 2160p. The streaming video is 720p at least to my monitor that is what it looks like.
They have picture sets for download.
It feels like they are getting everything right except the content. The positions even look the same from scene to scene as is the order of the sexual positions. It is why I felt the foot scenes added to the content. It at least breaks the monotony of following a set order of positions.
For me, between this site, Sex Art and X-Art, I have realized porn is not supposed to be romantic. Scenes like these strengthen the theories about sex being lust. There is little feeling of lust in the scenes. I will try to avoid scenes like these from now on. That is a subjective opinion. If you already know you like this type of porn then you will probably like this site. |
|
07-29-19 08:05pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
175
|
Marcus Mojo
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Advertised as the Next Door Male, quite handsome, athletic and clean-cut.
There are 127 scenes with most (100+) involving more than one guy.
I admit I prefer solo scenes, but these are some of the best gay sex scenes I have watched. There’s at least some theme to the scenes which I have noticed is rare in gay porn.
Navigation is good, the tags are useful, but I still question why a gay site needs a “gay porn” tag.
The pictures are good. This is one of the first gay sites I have seen with downloadable pictures that focus on the guy’s body.
The videos are downloadable with 75% having up to 1080p. The early 25% have up to 540p downloads. |
| Cons: |
Group sex in porn, whether males or males and females, rarely works because there are not enough cameras, or I don’t have enough eyes. The group sex scenes on this site have that problem.
No longer updating (has gay porn died?)
Not as much story as there should be. The story is playing out, but they could easily make these scenes more interesting with more dialogue. |
| Bottom Line: |
To start with, Marcus Mojo fits the “next door” image. He’s clean-cut, more of what I would call cute and unlike most porn models, he’s not even that greatly endowed. Someone would probably disagree with that, but it’s why I like the pictures. You can tell more about what you’re looking at when it’s not moving. He looks to be 5.5 to 6.5 inches. I even like the themes of the scenes and it’s why I am not being as focused on just solo scenes. There are only 18 solo scenes on the site. The themes mostly are in the athletic, sports theme, including jockstraps, two athletic guys in a gym changing room. Am I the only female that thinks about guys doing things with each other in the changing room? It couldn’t just be a female thing.
I do want to mention the pictures a little more. I hope that gay sites take note of this. A guy having sex on video is no different if it’s a male or female that he’s having sex with. Things are still flopping around; things are disappearing in holes and there’s not enough focus on the “things”. The pictures allow the things to hold still long enough to be admired. There are also 60-100 photos in these zip downloads.
The videos are downloadable with the majority having two small/mobile resolutions, the 480p and 540p resolutions, plus the HD 720p and 1080p resolutions. The videos are not long enough with most being under 20 minutes, but I attribute that to the basic themes/stories the scenes have. There seems to be a stressing of “we are rushing so not to get caught” to the scenes. Like they’re really not gay and are just having a fun time with each other before leaving the gym.
A compliment I won’t say a lot just because it’s a little lewder than I would go into, the cumshots are one of the most impressive parts and that’s a positive and negative. I find myself fast-forwarding to those. That could be my preference for solo males showing. The cumshot is one of, maybe the most important parts of the solo scene.
A site like this, I try to be fair and give a straight female perspective on what is marketed towards gay men, can be good for a straight female. There is enough variety in the setup of the scenes to give you the feeling of it’s not repetitive. There are threesomes (all guys), there are solo, there are one on one and there a few more than three guys scenes that have just too much going on to keep up with.
This would, I think, appeal to both gay men and straight women. There aren’t a lot of twinks in these scenes. The tags only list two scenes with twinks. These are more athletic, masculine men than most gay sites have on them. |
|
12-03-21 08:22pm
Replies (0)
|
|
