Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good network that used to be great
Nearly all models are attractive
Easily searchable and overall navigation
A good mix of niches
You can almost always find a cheap promo price
Cons:
Download limit of 25 videos per month
Picture sets are mediocre
A lot of the sites I remember from this network are no longer on this network
Bottom Line:
I can remember joining Lets Doe It back when it was first being advertised. It was very good, even great. Possibly one of the most diverse networks in porn. Then they decided to split it up and moved 13 of the sites to Amateur Euro. That was bad enough, but then they decided to operate with download limits. I am almost positive, at one time, the download limit was 100 per month. It’s now 25.
I joined Lets Doe It just a few weeks ago for a very low promo price. I have visited the site 4 times and downloaded nothing. I believe download limits do that to a member’s interest. Instead of looking at videos and thinking about which ones you like and want to download, you end up looking at videos with the thinking of “eliminating” some so you won’t hit the download limit.
Lets Doe It’s potential was very high, but they have not improved their photo sets and it’s just starting to feel like a downward spiral.
The models are still very attractive, but the lack of stories in the videos, mediocre picture sets and restrictive download limits just saps a lot of the energy as a member.
I would like to say there’s still something great going on at Lets Do It, but I find it difficult to say that. If you find a model you like or a niche you like, you have to start focusing on not downloading too many videos. For what it’s worth, their other network, Amateur Euro has completely fallen off with no updates. Lets Do It at least does still update.
The videos can be downloaded in HD quality and are good enough. Other than those allowed 25 downloads, there’s just not much else to interest me. I doubt I will download any of the videos now and can say unless something improves, there’s little to no reason for me to return as a member. Your experience with the site may be better than mine. My score for it is partially based in the potential.
I do believe they could right the ship with a few changes, maybe even just raise the download limit to 50 or 100. I don’t remember their download limits being as restrictive as they are now and back when Lets Doe It first started, there were no download limits. If downloading doesn’t interest you then you can adjust the score accordingly. Otherwise, this is at best, an average network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
There are 114 scenes, not a small site, but not impressive either
Easy to use search by tags
Can join using Paypal as well as many giftcards
Interesting looking camsite that I did not checkout
Rare porn that focuses on a single pregnant model, who sometimes adds a friend to the scene
Cons:
No High Definition content, of course no 4K either
No Pornusers discount so this is expensive for the quality
Not adding new scenes
No model interaction
Too many ads on members’ pages
Bottom Line:
A lot has changed for the better since this site was new. There are many porn fans who like interracial porn, but it is hardly rare or taboo any longer. I like porn with black men and I can enjoy seeing their cocks in action. However, I did not like seeing black men being stereotyped as thugs and the idea that black men all have huge cocks is not true. I also did not like that the white women were portrayed as cheating on their white boyfriends or husbands. One description I read was calling them lame ass white boys with tiny wieners or even worse, when compared to black men they have erectile dysfunction.
Ruth Blackwell is pregnant in most, but not all of the scenes. Pregnant porn is rather a theme with limited appeal to most porn fans I would imagine, as not much Is produced. I was uncomfortable with even the idea. She states that she wants child support from the presumably black father, but has no idea which of many he may be. The site describes her as she’s evil, she’s mean, she is the black cock queen. I don’t need to say I did not like much about this site.
The site does not have any High Definition videos, not a single one. In 2021 that makes this behind the times and by quite a lot. In my opinion, the scenes were barely watchable. The sex itself was rather standard and to the point. There is oral and vaginal, but for good reason nothing more extreme. Many of the scenes have another woman with her and her guy. Mostly these are blond white women, but I did see a few Asians and even a black woman, Alexis Silver. The woman who was the hottest was Kelly Wells, who was a major star years ago. In many of these scenes it is stated that her partner woman was trying to get pregnant in the scene. Another goal was to get the partner woman converted to preferring black men.
As a site, it was laid out well and easy to use. Searching is easy. It says there are live webcams featuring the models, but that leads to a link that goes nowhere. On the left side of the page, there is advertising for a cam site, called Dogfartlive, which I recognized as Streammate. I did not try it. I felt there was too much advertising for it, to the point that it was distracting. The site states that there will be updates, but the quality makes me think of porn from before 2010. There is zero model interaction too. No way to contact her, chat, make a request, nothing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
All videos can be downloaded in 4K
Zipped and downloadable photo sets.
You can also download the audio separately as well as read or download the sexy stories that she reads.
Uses a tag system for searching.
Pretty UK women with sexy accents
The site uses two very reputable billers, Epoch and CCBill
The site has 168 videos and photosets.
Cons:
Hasn't updated since July 2017. However, the preview page promises weekly updates both videos and photos.
Nude, but not as explicit as I might like.
Bottom Line:
The site describes itself as erotic stories read by sexy girls in and out of their lingerie. I liked the slow stripping by sexy models wearing sexy outfits. However, I don’t get very turned on by sexy words or stories. The stories read here were interesting and tasteful, but not vulgar in any way.
I like porn that appeals to my imagination, but here the scenes stretched just what my capacity is for using my imagination. Unlike most porn, the visuals helped to only a very small degree. The models are pretty British women who have classy accents. The action, such as it is, is them reading while very slowly stripping out of hot outfits. They all get to nude, but not all of them are explicit. I was left hoping for her to show more, but this site is very softcore visually.
You can also read the text that she is reading in an erotic sort of way. The stories were not very extreme and the language very softcore. It reminded me a lot of the stories in poorly written women's erotic novels. This is a typical line: “I feel his huge member pulsing through his jeans. I nearly convulse with the feeling.” I know I would not find the word member very stimulating. Maybe they should try being a bit more vulgar? I am sure this is not for everybody, but I expect that there is the target audience for this style of porn story writing. It just did not work for me.
I might have liked the concept if the models were masturbating while reading the stories. Show me a little passion and maybe I might feel turned on. If the model was not getting much out of it, how and why would I? If they were talking about a cock, why not act out the fantasy on a dildo?
There were some UK based pornstars that I have seen on other UK sites, such as Cherry Blush, Kate Anne and part Filipina Natalia Forrest. Just as most pornstars are not good actresses, not all can read text and tell a story in a sensual way. I felt that Natalia Forrest hit on all cylinders. She could melt ice with her storytelling. In total there are 40 pornstars on the site.
The site was simple to use and downloads very fast at about 90% of my maximum capacity. There are 168 videos and about as many photo sets. Photo sets are downloadable as zips shots from the videos. There was also a degree of erotic power in the audio. You can stream as well as download just the audio as an MP3 file. I have never seen that on any other site, but here it makes complete sense. You can also read the text that she is reading in an erotic sort of way. You can favorite the scenes. The site comes with no extras. I liked that the site uses Epoch and CCBill for billing. Both are trusted billers and make cancellation simple. I saw no prechecked cross sales, not even for their other sites. I joined using Paypal through CCBill. The site rebills automatically at the end of your subscription, so be sure to cancel early.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Blowjob, swallowing, and most of the women are supposed to be shooting their first scene.
Pretty women, some variety as well.
The scene count on the site is 241 which compared to Rear Admiral’s review from 4 years ago means they don’t update much, but 241 scenes is a lot.
They use Epoch and the price is cheap through Porn Users at $12.50/month.
Some of the scenes do seem to be “new” as the two newest ones are Valentine's Day themed.
Cons:
This is probably the least rough site on Top Web Models and it’s rougher than I was expecting. The name, to me, is very misleading.
No 4K videos and the 1080p seem to have very high bitrates with the scenes topping the 2GB mark in size.
I normally wouldn’t consider this a con, but some of the scenes are just too long for the niche (some nearing 40 minutes)
Bottom Line:
I still consider myself in the exploratory stage of hardcore porn sites. Top Web Models sounds like a softcore site, maybe some lesbian, some solo scenes, but nothing doing. The content on this site isn’t as hardcore as their other sites, but it’s still more hardcore than I normally would join. I am sure there is a market for this site especially since I will estimate 60-70% of the scenes say it’s the model’s first time. I think they should update it and tell if it was their last scene too.
This site does have introductions to the model. This includes typical questions asked by porn producers. The model also teases a little including stripping and that’s when things fall into a similar pattern from scene to scene. They do include downloadable photo sets that focus just on the female model for the first 40-60 pictures and those pictures are 2808x1872 in resolution.
Once beyond the focus on the female model the scenes become POV of the female giving the man a blowjob. These blowjobs vary from scene to scene. Some are rougher, some are more gentle, but all I have watched end with the guy cumming in the woman’s mouth. He then taps her chin so she opens her mouth to show the cum is in her mouth and she swallows. The introduction gains this site some points since the action part is very repetitive.
The newer videos can be downloaded in what it says is “Original” 1920x1080 or “HQ” which is also 1920x1080. These files are the same size. I don’t see the difference. They also offer an odd “Stream” download. I haven’t ever seen a site call a download a stream quality. It is 960x540. There is also a “Mobile” download that is 480x270. There’s too much disparity there. The first two are 2 GB each, the third drops down to 540MB and the fourth is 271MB. Very few of the scenes are worth a 2GB download. I like some of the scenes, but it doesn’t make much sense to me to have 4 different video formats with 1.5GB difference between the two highest and two others.
All in all, I would recommend this site itself to those maybe interested in rougher blowjobs, but not the violent, punishing kind. A few of the women on this site do get their makeup smeared, but this is the tamest of the sites on this network. It doesn’t stand out in any way other than I haven’t seen hardly any of these women before and quite a few are very pretty.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
09-30-1911:11pm (Update History) Reason: Graded it on streaming abilities, original review was more frustrated with their lie on their join page.
Pros:
Network of 6 sites, a fitness site, a massage site, a MILF site, a hardcore site and two lesbian sites.
The content looks very good, but I was tricked by a promotional offer from them. I can't download anything.
There are 471 models on the network with most looking like pros.
The download options for videos show 360p to 1080p
They have photo sets that can be downloaded.
Cons:
The join screen said unlimited downloads. Once inside, it told me I had to pay $14.95 to download. Anyone could go to the site right now, click join and you will see the unlimited downloads banner with no asterisk or fine print.
It looks like most of it is very normal porn. The promo showed fitness scenes that looked like group environments, but the scenes on the site don't look that way.
Bottom Line:
I decided to rewrite this bottom line. I still am upset by the promotion of unlimited downloads only to find out they come at an extra charge.
I will give a basic overview of what you get. You can stream the videos and look at the photos.
Dane Jones is a standard hardcore site with 698 scenes, it updates 3 times per week.
Lesbea is a standard lesbian site with 600 scenes, it updates 1-2 times per week, 6 updates in September.
Massage Rooms has both scenarios of massages, men massaging women, women massaging men and sex. It has 528 scenes and updated 6 times in September.
MomXXX is a MILF site with straight sex and lesbian sex, it only updated twice in September.
Fitness Rooms is an exercise and exercise clothing fetish hardcore site. It has 163 scenes and updated twice in September.
Girlfriends is a lesbian site, more college-type age models and has 204 scenes. It updated 3 times in September.
The download options are 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p, you have to pay $14.95 for them. I feel like I'm writing a repeat review of Mofos. There's good quality content here. The Girlfriends site is really good.
There are hardly no ads in the member's area. The site works well, you can browse by site or by network update. You can browse by model. They have an excellent tagging system. Everything is in place for a top-tier site except telling you that you get unlimited downloads then saying you have to pay $14.95 for them.
I felt like Mofos might be worth paying the extra for on the downloads, but this Sexy Hub site doesn't feel like it is. This feels like a site that should be around $15 and it should include downloads.
I've developed a frustrated feeling with these sites. I'm not even a regular downloading type member, but I have noticed most Porn User members are. It does say in the TBP review that downloads cost extra, but it said unlimited downloads on the join page.
To add to this, I went through the cancel by chat process and it took nearly 25 minutes. The rep asked me why I was canceling. I told him/her I was going out of town and didn't want to forget it. The rep then told me they found an expired promo they would let me have for $72 a year. I thanked them, but told them I would rather not join long-term. They disconnected the chat. A few minutes later I received a cancellation email. I will try to avoid joining sites with this biller from now on.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge black dicks, most described as more than a foot long
Barbie is cute and very playful
Cons:
Too expensive and PU does not have a discount
TBP had a review in 2014 that showed 27 video. It still does. Not updating
The best quality is Standard Definition. The site is probably from before 2010.
Only visually boring internal cumshots
The scene descriptions are uncomfortably borderline racist. Definitely stereotypical.
No interactons with the model, no chat, emails, or camsite.
Bottom Line:
The preview says she is he queen of the black guy creampie. The site says it has 30 videos, there are 27, and is adding updates regularly and it is a dead site. Unfortunately when looking at the low quality content, all you see is in Standard Definition. By my guess, that would mean this was actively updating before 2010. The video count is far too few and it says they were all added in 2021.
So who is Barb Cummings? She is an attractive thin blond American model who was on several sites before getting one just for herself. Here, she comes across well and has a hot personality. The premise is that her father taught her to hate black men. Out of pure spite, she wants to go in the complete opposite direction and have a black baby. Did I leave out that her goal is to show her getting pregnant on camera? In many scene descriptions she says she is disappointed with yet another pregnancy test. So on to another two or three black men to try again. She describes her partners in very stereotypical ways. In many cases the reason she is with so many guys at once is that they would not do the scene if they had to pay child support. Many possible fathers, no 18 year monetary commitment. In two scenes she has pornstar Gia Paloma help her.
With pregnancy a goal, she has managed to find a way to do scenes that have a unique theme for porn. However, as a woman, I want to see cum shots. These are all internals. In a few scenes you see the cum dripping out, but that does nothing for me. It does zero to get her pregnant either. On the other hand the black guys are really dark and huge. She describes them as footlongs and even more. I don’t think that is literally accurate, but they do look really large.
The downloads were fast, the site uses tags for searching and you also get a photoset for each video. There are no interactions with the model, no chat, emails, or camsite. The site is what you see and you should never expect any updates or other changes.
I could not resist and I cheated and looked her up online. Years ago she was pulled over for speeding and gave the trooper a blow job to get out of it. She recorded it all, posted it online and he lost his job. She was married from before this site was active and had a white baby with her white husband. It was just a way to get noticed. If you find her fantasy to be hot you can try out this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The biller is Epoch
Updates once a week and there are more than 260 videos
Uses a lot of warmup and lube to get the models ready
Cons:
There are no photos
You get only this one site when you join and that's not clear when you join.
I don’t like the clothes on the models
Very little variety from one scene to the next
No 4K downloads or streaming
Bottom Line:
It is no secret that most porn is marketed towards men. As a woman I like to see anal sex, but prefer when it is done where the female models enjoy it as much as the men. True Anal is a site where there are many scenes that I can relate to, but not really that I can point out as outstanding. The two with Jynx Maze are probably the best on the site.
There was initial disappointment -- I clicked to join Nympho and it brought up True Anal. At the top of True Anal there is a tab for sites. One is Nympho, one is Swallowed, one is All Anal and one is Anal Only. I'm not above admitting a mistake, but when you show "sites" on the join page, maybe it's just me, I think those sites come with a membership. Maybe I wouldn't have thought that if their advertising was correct. It clearly says "6 new updates per month". True Anal had 3 updates in July, 0 in June, and 6 in all the previous months. That made me think with only 3 updates over June and July or 25% of what they advertised and had established as their normal of 6 updates per month, the other 4 sites listed on the join page came with the site and that's where the other "updates" were coming from. They can take the blame for having their other sites listed on the join page or for only having 3 updates over 2 months, on a site that averages 6 updates per month. I also wouldn't have just joined this site. I was more interested in Nympho. Once I joined, the other sites required separate, paid memberships to access. I do think it's manipulation. The sites when listed in the guest area just drop down from the menu. Once in the member area the "sites" tab is gone and replaced with a banner that says "join all of our sites for a low price!" Shouldn't that be more clear on the join page instead of showing you the other 4 sites?
The director and male model is Mike Adriano. He is good looking, big but not the biggest stunt cock in porn and tries to make the models enjoy the scenes. The scenes start with an interview, where the models talk about how much they like anal sex and how much they are looking forward to working with Mike. He listens attentively and asks the questions. Most porn interviews on other sites seem superficial and a bit unbelievable, but these on the site seem a lot better. It sounds like two friends just talking. He gives them a lot of warm up stimulation both manually and anilingual, not really common in porn. He uses lots of lube, which looks like it makes the scenes easy for the models. Sometimes the lube is applied too much and the model’s butts glisten in the bright sunlight. Most cumshots I saw were internal, which to me is a bit of a disappointment. In some scenes, he pulls out and aims at her gaping butt. By far I liked those better. In some scenes she pushes his cum out. In some others she pushes it onto a spoon or cup and drinks it. For me, that is pushing the boundaries of sexy into a bit extreme visuals that I was not so comfortable with. The sex was reasonably rhythmic and not as forceful as some anal I have seen on other sites. The women are not wincing from discomfort and look quite believably turned on.
The site is good sized with more than 260 scenes, but there are no additional sites that come with your membership. Instead, you are offered a discount for some others that look interesting. You also don’t get any pictures, but I don’t care about that.
The scenes are basically a formula that works for you or it does not. The scenes are very similar and the set is the same. It looks like it is his house and often his backyard and reminds me of California. The models wear clothes that do nothing for me, just what you have seen on a gonzo type site for the past few years. Searching is not so great and there are far too few tags. There is no advanced search. Being Americans, I would have expected a few more that were Black or Asian or Latina, but most are not. They are mostly quite pretty, but are mostly the standard look of many porn models in older porn of a few years ago. There is quite a bit of makeup and hardware. I don't mind a few tattoos, but must add that many models have them.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
