Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
126
|
Quest For Orgasm
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with Lets Doe It Network
Labor Day Sale price of $9.94 for a month
Great looking pornstars and some I think are amateurs
Highest quality production values
Uses tags for easy searching, however searching is across the network |
| Cons: |
Monthly download limit of 100 videos for the network as a whole
Only 80 scenes
Has not updated since September 2017 |
| Bottom Line: |
For me when I think of the word quest, I imagine a long complicated story with a hero looking for something rare and difficult to reach. In contrast, this site is about heroines finding female sexual empowerment by masturbating. These heroines could easily be me or really any modern woman. I could also imagine these videos being used as a teaching guide for women on how to satisfy those urges we all get. This quest can be fulfilled with a site like this showing how.
The women are all portrayed as pretty, but not different from you or me. The scenes start with interviews, with both them and the interviewer having difficulty with English. This helps me see their sincerity when they answer questions about their education, hobbies and non sexual interests. They laugh, they smile, they explain and it all makes me feel I know them and want to learn more. A few are described as pornstars, such as the superstar Alexis Crystal, but mostly they appear to be naturally beautiful young ladies who want to make a little money doing what comes across as what they do every day in their personal lives. Porn interviews generally don’t hold much interest for me, but these I loved.
The scenes vary in length, but the interviews are about a third of each scene. The models do what they said they like, using fingers, a few videos have fisting, dildos, other toys, but especially wands. Some videos would work well as commercials for wand companies. The orgasms are depicted as real and I am sure they are. In some the expressions on their faces are an indicator of the intensity, and in many their whole body shakes. I see myself in these models and their videos.
The feeling of the site is that the production is professional, even if some of the models are not. They use multiple cameras and the scenes focus changes as necessary. The makeup is great and so are the locations. As there are only 80 scenes, I was left wondering why there are not a few more. Surely there must be many more models who would be willing to do scenes of this quality. They are made to look their best and portrayed as women to be appreciated. But, the last update was four years ago.
This site comes with the Lets Doe it Network, which I really loved. Right now there is a special low price of $9.94 for a month and this site alone is worth a lot more than that. |
|
09-05-21 06:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
127
|
Fucking Glasses
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
01-27-20 07:30pm (Update History)
Reason: Technical problem that the site fixed.
|
| Pros: |
*Added 20 points to score. My membership started out saying it was a trial even though I paid full price. A few days later, the trial part was removed and I had full access and downloads of all scenes.*
I took a risk on an interesting premise and can't say it's bad, but the experience was. The content itself is good.
The concept is recording sex with what I believe are complete amateurs while wearing glasses that record the action.
Very high quality 1080p, I assume that's high quality for recording with their eyeglasses.
A lot of content, but there are multiple buts in this, they have 122 videos and over 1,000 photosets just on this site.
It was not advertised as a network, but once inside it has 15 other sites and says a total of over 1,000 videos and 90,000 photos.
They use Epoch as the billing agent. |
| Cons: |
It took 30 minutes to access the site as it kept telling me my account doesn't exist even though I was using the username and password they sent me!
Once inside the members area it says my account is a trial. It was $15. I have access to I'm going to say maybe 20% of the videos. The others have a pink X on the them and say not for trial members. To see those, I have to upgrade and pay more money. I'm not an angry person, but what's the fucking point of me joining a site for $15 a month then telling me it's a trial that doesn't include everything?
Their frustrating first login was made worse by the login page not being secure. I'm guessing when someone hacks my non-secure login they'll blame that on me too. |
| Bottom Line: |
I saw an advertisement for this and I really thought it was a site about women with glasses. After taking the tour, I saw that it's about video camera glasses recording the pickup, the sex and whatever else goes on (talking, getting to know, etc...)
Here's just a random thought from a scene I watched. Nerdy girl in the library, guy walks up and starts talking to her, they end up in what looks like a hotel having sex. It became very confusing. She had on glasses. The recording wasn't from the guy's eyes perspective. I don't know if they even know what Fucking Glasses is based on. The part that surprised me was this very full network that came with it. There's a reason for that, Fucking Glasses hasn't been updated since 2014. These other network sites have been updated and most of those are NOT for "trial" members.
Just focusing on Fucking Glasses, I have access to TWO of 112 videos.
So, I went ahead and upgraded since I do like how this content looks. It's not worth the trial + upgrade price. The full price came to $44.95. It was $29.95 to upgrade to full membership.
It does seem to be amateur content and it looks like any other amateur site. There's times where the cameraman looks like he/she has a clue and there's time the cameraman looks like he/she is watching a fly on the wall. There's too much going on in some scenes with more than one couple and the one couple scenes are surprisingly formulaic for amateur porn.
These are the sites included with the network.
Fucking Glasses, She is Nerdy, Tricky Agent (their marketing team), Mom's Passion, Make Him Cuckold, Young Courtesans, Disgrace That Bitch (can't make this up), Private Casting X, Trick Your GF, X Sensual, X Massage, Brutal X, Kinky Family, Spy POV and Debt Sex.
The more I've signed in I've noticed there seems to be a hub site called Dirty Flix or that's what the network is called.
The sites amount of content ranges from 1 scene to 368 scenes. With full access they do have 4K on the newer videos and even though I believe it's amateur content it feels more like a Reality Kings Lite or Brazzers Lite.
My opinion of it has went up and down since joining. Since I'm still a member, I don't know if there's a way to join it without going through the $14.95 trial and upgrading for $29.95. At best, this is a $19.95 a month site and that includes downloads.
They advertise 1,000+ videos, 90,000 photos and 620 models. That's not really a very high amount for 16 sites.
The majority of the content is straightforward male/female sex and it follows the pattern most porn sites follow. You can tell I'm more on the down side of my feelings towards the site as my membership is nearing the end and I feel like I wasted $45.
I am figuring price in with my score since if I didn't pay the extra price I wouldn't have been able to access 80-90% of the content. I can be nice about it and say they should look into a new way of billing, a more honest way or I can be blunt and say there's no way I would recommend this site for $44.95. I wouldn't even recommend it for $29.95.
There are a few of the sites that might hit a fetish for some like the Sell your GF site where a boyfriend agrees to let his girlfriend have sex with another guy while he sits and watches. Another is the Fucking Glasses site and She is Nerdy which has the nerd/cum on glasses fetish, but overall, I just can't recommend this network until they figure out how their site is going to work.
They have an updated box on the network in the members area that says once your membership is expired you can still access the site, look at the photos and a few of the videos, which is exactly what my $15 membership fee got me. I'll just write this one up to experience and try to be more careful about joining sites. I went to the site with a different browser and sure enough, it says nothing about the membership being a limited $15 trial. It even says multiple ways to download and stream.
If I had received all the content it said I would for $14.95, I would have scored it in the mid-80s as a network. As it is, I wouldn't score it over a 65. |
|
01-14-20 12:29am
Replies (2)
|
Review
128
|
Asshole Fever
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gaping site that focuses on anal sex (not a favorite mine)
They have 863 scenes. It updates twice per month.
Video downloads do vary with some scenes being old, but the newer ones have up to 4K.
Downloadable videos and picture zips (as long as you pay for the subscription with downloads)
Very pretty models, not exactly the type of models I expect in anal porn. Most are European. |
| Cons: |
It is subjective, I am not a big fan of anal porn, but if you can do more with it than just 25 minutes of anal pounding, it will at least interest me. I find a lot of anal sites, the scenes, come off as punishing. This one doesn’t give me that feeling.
There’s not much variety. That goes for the style of scene, the looks of the models, the body types, the settings. There’s a lot of sameness from scene to scene.
It’s anal porn, that’s all the story you need and get. I’m just being honest, not sarcastic. |
| Bottom Line: |
I will give this site some credit. I usually do not like anal porn sites. I am halfway through a year subscription to Adult Time and am working my way through the sites. This one is acceptable enough anal porn. I want to put laugh out loud. The models are very pretty. Most of my early interest in porn was Nubiles. I am familiar with the European models. Most of the anal sites I see today are American. You have the, am I going too far, brutality of the punishing anal scene? It’s not me condemning it. It’s me questioning if the producers of this type of porn only does what my last con said? You just don’t get a lot of story or build-up or lead-in. It is something I believe porn producers have to start thinking about. It is why I am going to give this site some credit but am also going to talk about the problem I have with this genre and how it is filmed or produced/directed/written. One of the newer scenes is a gorgeous woman named Jayla De Angelis. She is swimming nude; she goes up to her balcony and is masturbating. The neighbor is watching and he’s masturbating. She’s giving him a blowjob by 4 minutes in. Between the 4-minute mark and 10-minute mark, there’s some blowjob, then anal for the last 15 minutes. It seems lazy. I know women that have anal sex with their husband or boyfriends. I have never heard one say, after 9 minutes foreplay, he jumped right in her butt. The bigger picture to what I am saying is, I think the anal focus, plays to such a large fetish for so many men, it lets the producers/directors/writers, just cruise control through the scene.
This site at least has some non-anal content. It will turn to anal before the scene is over and that’s why I am at least giving it some credit. They have another site that is called 21 Erotic Anal. It has 267 scenes on it and I like those. That is figuring into my review of this site specifically, it does look like the producers of Asshole Fever realized to try a more erotic, sensual version of the site with 21 Erotic Anal. I just wished there was something separating foreplay straight to anal.
If you add the 267 scenes on 21 Erotic Anal, you end up with 1,130 scenes, when adding those to the 863 scenes on Asshole Fever. You are going to have to go through those and find the ones that you like. I think the anal genre is geared directly at those that love anal sex. If that’s you, you may love all these scenes. There are good download options from 160p to 4K on the last few years. Before that, HD with 720p and 1080p as the highest options. I can recognize the quality of the scenes. It just depends on if I’m being completely subjective or objective. It’s a good site for what it is. |
|
02-09-22 06:21am
Replies (0)
|
Review
129
|
Men Over 30
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very large gay site that has some very large men on it.
The site has 1,373 scenes and is updating twice per month.
Good categories that helped me find 25 solo videos.
Not a typical gay male site except for the sex. Big, athletic, even burly men.
I have to think this is one of the oldest, still active gay sites, the earliest scenes are from 2005.
Newer scenes have up to 4K |
| Cons: |
As burly and masculine as these men are there are only 25 solo scenes out of 1,373. I do think the number is higher. The oldest scenes don’t seem to be tagged.
Starting to realize gay sex only has two places to stick it.
Oldest scenes are only 480p. |
| Bottom Line: |
I thought seeing two big, burly, masculine men, naked and rolling around together would be sexy. It is some of the scenes. Some of the scenes are a reminder that most men are not near as flexible as women.
The standout for me are the 25 solo scenes. This is good, male solo porn. Maybe it’s because they’re older? I am very confident there are more than 25 solo scenes too. The last one listed when using the solo category is from 2012. The site’s content goes back to 2005 and two of the oldest scenes are solo. It looks like they just started tagging around 2012. Big, burly, bearded guys masturbating is almost as good as I expected it to be. These guys give the imagination enough to work with and convince ourselves they are masturbating for us women, but then they’ll decide to hop up on their knees and spread their butt cheeks for the camera. The solo scenes are good.
The sex scenes are better than on other gay sites I have watched. The main reason is these guys are masculine and don’t make me feel like a man is more flexible than I am. I watched one gay scene from another site where the guy was having anal from a split. These scenes let me at least think and imagine these are guys in jail and they’re just having sex with each other until they get out and can find a woman. It’s more believable than most guys watching 4 gorgeous lesbians and thinking they’re going to invite him to join them!
This site is really good and more updated than most gay sites I’ve been a member of. You have the 4K video downloads. Two updates per month. Over 1,000 scenes backing the updates. It also has very good navigation. The categories section is helpful as are the tags. It’s not a cluttered site and only one small ad at the bottom of the pages. It just has a real professional feel to it. I would like more solo scenes, but solo gay just doesn’t seem very popular. Am I just delirious for thinking guys masturbate a lot? If you look at the porn industry, it makes it look more like women are the only ones masturbating. |
|
12-08-21 03:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
130
|
Sweethearts Classics
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fresh faced teens you probably never saw before
Tags for searching
Part of Adult Prime network of over 75 sites
Adding scenes once a week
Uses Epoch as a biller |
| Cons: |
All remastered videos. The quality varies quite a bit as some of the original videos are not possible to convert to modern quality. However remastered is better than unwatchable quality.
The site needs growth as there are almost 50 videos, but there are many, many more older scenes that need a makeover sitting in the Club Sweetheart archives. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site had its origins as a magazine in 1995 and was then called Club Seventeen. The models have always been of legal age, 18 and older and this was just a name. Recently it has been renamed as Club Sweethearts and is the main site within the Adult Prime network. As many of its scenes were filmed before High Definition became available, many of the better scenes need an upgrade. Those scenes that have been redone are now on this site, Sweetheart Classics. As of right now, there are almost fifty scenes that have been remastered. I hope many more are redone as the content really caught my interest.
Much of the porn made in recent years has been dull and too much like they are made in a factory. Many scenes are ten minutes of this, five minutes of that and another ten minutes of another act. The models change, but the scenes are almost clones. A few years ago, porn was a bit more creative.
Seventeen of the scenes are groups with a lesbian theme. They are named: lesbian swimming team, lesbian garden party, five girl lesbian pop group, lesbian orgy, seven girls and a bottle of oil, all girl water polo team, lesbian orgy at the stables, lesbian sex Olympics, four girl dildo party, lesbian army invasion, three sporty lesbians, four girls, two water bikes, four girl lesbian carwash, ballet girl orgy, five girls in a foam bath, a three girl get together. There are seven other lesbian scenes. There are also seven group scenes with boy/girl sex. The mix may change as they add content, but as of today it seems to me to have a theme of a lot of group lesbian sex scenes that I like. I read once that in porn today they do not use very many models in a scene and that is to reduce cost. In a group scene, you can see a lot of interaction in ways that modern porn does not attempt. There is always another pussy to be seen, always another one to be licked, always another with a toy or a wand being used. Sometimes there are two or three on one and often the pairings switch. It reminds me of a sex buffet.
The models are young and thin white women from Eastern Europe. I am not sure how many went on to a porn career or how many have their only scene here. It seemed to me they are fresh and eager with that special glow of exploratory sex. I thought the models added some natural sexiness to the visuals. In reading some of the replies to the videos, members have posted that some of them have another porn name that they have used.
I can’t say there is much I don’t like about the content, but for me they seem to use more toys and wands than I would prefer. That may be a hint that they are made for male fantasy or it may just be that is how lesbian porn was made then. I am basically nitpicking, but I like more tender lesbian sex and a bit more of a relaxed pace. Don't get me wrong, I liked the scenes here. One of my teachers once told me there is always room for improvement.
In all fairness, as much as they try to improve the quality of older videos, they don’t look anywhere near as sharp and clear as newly made High Definition ones are. There is only so much you can do to enhance the quality, but there are many scenes here that I would not have even bothered trying before they were remastered. The site was easy to use, the tags let you have an easy search, the download speeds fast enough and with over 75 sites in the network, more than enough to keep you busy. |
|
10-19-21 01:10pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
131
|
My MILFz
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All 85 videos can be downloaded in HD
Updates are twice a month
Part of huge network that includes over 75 studios
Epoch is the biller |
| Cons: |
Not much age difference between the models
Search not just for this site, but whole network
Just nitpicking, but only six lesbian scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
MILF refers to an age of about 25 to maybe 40. Actually I have even seen stars older than that called MILFs. I guess it means stars that are not young and not really ready to be called older. I am in that age range myself. I don’t think that I am young and innocent any longer and that does not bother me at all. I feel women get sexier as they get more confident with age.
When I logged onto the site, I found that the men were close to the age of the women more often than not. Even when the differences are noticeable, the scenes don’t play up the age difference much. I found a few scenes where it was a pairing of student with teacher or with the principal. Mostly though, it was not important. This is not a site that can be called older/younger. Besides those scenes, there were a few that had a concept, such as maid and boss. In those the age difference was not the center of the video.
There were a few things that I rather liked about the site. The first is that nearly all scenes are of models from the UK. I love those accents and admit a Brit with an accent makes me pay attention. Many of the guys are good looking, as well as nicely dressed and groomed. I could go for that. Many of the women looked slutty, which works for me as a porn fantasy. In contrast though, in some scenes the women were dressed in a very feminine manner with nice dresses or skirts, nylons, pretty panties etc.
Most of the sex was interesting and kept me watching. However, I feel no scene is ok without a great cumshot. Most of these were externals and I prefer those to internal ones. The guys were above average in size compared to guys in real life, but by porn standards nothing special. They got the job done. Even the internal scenes had an unusual focus when the women put their fingers inside and scooped out some cum.
There were only six lesbian scenes out of the 85 on the site. I thought they were at best just ok. I did see one lesbian four way, but the other scenes were all one on one, both the lesbian scenes as well as the boy/girl. There were a few scenes with black women and also a few with very dark black men with white women. The black men were nicely built down there and the women appreciated that.
If I had to sum up the sex parts, it was a better than ok site with a few quite hot videos. The quality was good at High Definition as the best on offer and this comes with a huge network. |
|
10-19-21 12:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
132
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my first times trying Kink out. This is one of the better sites for my taste in porn.
High-powered machines with dildos on them being used on women in various ways.
The scenes are long, I would even say that is part of the “pain”. Most are 40-60 minutes.
The remastered versions of their older videos have 1080p downloads.
Lots of squirting, writhing orgasms, messy orgasms, this is a site that I believe we can be assured is showing real orgasms.
All scenes are downloadable, but the highest download option on most is 720p |
| Cons: |
No longer updates, but it is all new to me.
The noise of the machines, the women screaming, moaning, sadly, to me takes away some of the eroticism.
Would be hard to justify as a purchase by itself. The scenes, even though I like them, are very similar. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Kink two other times in the past, but did not look into all the sites and even once, joined Kink Men, without realizing it gave me full access to the whole network. Nearly everything on the network is harder than I like or prefer, but I like to try different things.
There’s no story or plot or any secret about these scenes. A woman is going to lay down on a table, possibly strapped (bondage) to the table or against a wall, there are multiple variations as to how they position the women. Some have ball gags in their mouth which I believe helps with the noise level. I feel bad for saying that, but some of the scenes are unwatchable based on all the noise mixed with the women’s screams.
The last update was on August 20, 2020 and it was a remastered Sasha Grey scene. I have noticed most of the sites on Kink have a lot of recent remasters. The only difference I see in those is they have a 1080p download option. With the length of these videos they are large files even in 720p.
I think what I liked most about it and it’s why my score is positive is that the models are often mainstream porn models. This seems like a niche made for amateurs, but the mainstream models, many of which are sexy, show a side of these models that you don’t see in their mainstream scenes. I’m not sure if that is a good thing -- for the porn industry as a whole, there are some known “innocent and sweet” models on here showing they are wild and experienced, but that’s what happens when a woman watches too much porn. I start noticing things that are not that important to the point of the scene.
I believe the other strong point is you’re seeing real orgasms on this site. There’s not a way to fake an 8 inch dildo hammering inside the woman for 40 minutes. There is squirting, puddling, sticky messes and the women do talk about the experience. They all seem very pleased and satisfied!
The rest of the site is basic, but that’s not a detraction. The scenes are laid out 20 to a page, the download options on the majority of scenes are 720p, 540p, 360p, 288p and 270p. There are pictures, but it seems like to me this is the one site where pictures are not useful. There’s too much movement.
I would recommend it to anyone like me who is interested in something different and tries Kink out. I believe this is the least hardcore or possibly “offensive” of their sites. They do excellent work with the cameras and in making the models at least seem comfortable. |
|
06-09-21 05:02am
Replies (1)
|
Review
133
|
Met Art X
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It is similar to Met Art except with more explicit videos and less of everything else.
308 models and 307.5 of them are 8 or higher on a 10 scale. Very pretty women.
They have 1,025 videos and 838 photo sets.
They update daily with either a video or photo set.
Everything is downloadable and without limits as far as I can tell.
Could possibly subscribe to the theory of less is more when compared to regular Met Art. |
| Cons: |
Other reviewers have mentioned this con on various sites on the Met Art Network, those Staff Selection scenes are kind of annoying. There also are ads on the right margin of your screen.
If Met Art’s explicitness is a 3-4 on a 10 scale, Met Art X’s explicitness is a 6-7, I would like to see them up it a little more in the 8-10 range since this is still solo porn and not hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
There are alternating feelings with this site. I also joined Met Art’s regular site. I was completely and utterly overwhelmed by Met Art’s regular site. It would take me a year just to see all their models. Met Art X has a much more manageable 308 models to sort through and it’s more explicit -- just not as explicit as it probably should be.
I was surprised by the lower amount of photo sets than videos since Met Art is known best for photos. The feeling I get from this site is that it's what would happen if Met Art regular let their shoots run an extra 15-20 minutes. You still get the tease, you still get the strip (most scenes) and instead of stopping at showing off their pink, you get to watch them use it on Met Art X.
The site is relatively large and the quality is very high. The photo sets and videos combine for nearly 2,000 potential downloads and I have not read or seen anything about limits on the downloads. They are updating daily which is a rarity these days and they seem to have updates prepared for the future. You can check to see what the next updates are going to be. Which is good for the consumer and for the site too. It could help you decide to keep the membership for another month or decide to cancel.
My biggest con and complaint is the masturbation is on the more gentle side. As a member of 5 of Met Art’s sites right now it almost seems like I’m going through a progression with each site. With me, watching young women masturbate can be very arousing or very boring. There doesn’t seem to be a middle ground. Some of these scenes go into very arousing and the rest are very boring. When I reviewed Nubiles (my once favorite site), I talked about how the most realistic masturbation can be the least interesting to watch. I don’t get that feeling as much on Met Art X, but it is there. What does most realistic masturbation mean? That the model is trying to get off as fast as possible. If she does it in a sexy way that’s good, if she doesn’t, she doesn’t care since she still got off and got paid doing it. The first solo models I remember watching around 2008-2010 did that too, but there were some of those who seemed to be as much into being sexy, being seductive and alluring the viewer into watching her masturbate. Which does give the viewer the feeling they want you to join them. It seems to be the magic ticket with solo porn.
That is a personal complaint and doesn’t really reflect negative feelings towards the site. The site for my money more than delivers on giving you the content you paid for. There are 4K, 1080p, 720p, and smaller download resolutions on the videos. The photo sets can be downloaded in 3 different sizes and are of the same quality you would expect from a Met Art site. I just wish the content was a little harder even as solo content. From the content I have looked through there are no other genres explored than solo. If there’s a lesbian scene in there I must have missed it. Doing a search on the site for “lesbian” brings up 4 scenes, but all 4 are solo. Maybe they are saying the model is a lesbian in real life? There is no male/female.
It’s still a good site as long as you know what you are getting into. In my limited experience with porn it is not that common for me to see a site that is strictly solo. The women, the technical quality and ease of use of the site all help the site greatly. The tags are helpful, but I do think they could find another way to list those. There is no menu for tags. You just see the tags once inside a scene and have to hope one of the tags is one you’re looking for. The search box does let you search, but there is that inaccuracy with the lesbian search. These are ticky-tacky problems to what is to me a better way to introduce yourself to the world of Met Art since it’s not overwhelming. |
|
04-06-21 02:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
134
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of naked men being groped, sucked and fucked by "stranger" women.
As a past member, it is nice to see their additions of multiple camera angles to see different views of the action and different models.
Have changed nearly all scenes to a new style, combining what used to be 2-3 part scenes into 1 and scenes over the last year have 4 different camera angles.
That random drunk woman you know isn't a porn star that grabs two of the guys and sticks their dicks in her mouth.
Most of the guys are attractive.
The amateurs in the crowd -- in most cases -- look like real amateurs. |
| Cons: |
The editing needs to be improved. Having to watch the scene from 4 different cameras gives it a "genuine" feel, but they no problem getting every cumshot into the scene.
The porn girls in the scenes are either too obvious by their looks or they have yellow bands on their arms letting the guys know which are the women to do the most with.
In a few words -- the scenes are too hectic.
Same venues. |
| Bottom Line: |
If I had reviewed this site 10 years ago it would have been a mid-90s. It was different and seemed to be aimed at women viewers. The scenes often lasted too long, but they were enjoyable. I think the new format with 4 camera views is good if there are parts you really want to see. If the scene is not a good one, the 4 camera view makes it 4 times worse.
I don't know if the DVD site Videoez had anything to do with the change in the way the scenes are now laid out, but at one time, you could download a lot of these scenes from Videoez in "Best of" compilations. That is how they have done the older scenes on here. They have taken the best of their previous 90 minute scenes and lowered them to 30 minutes.
They have photos and screencaps which I don't remember them having in the past. The photos show a lot of what you don't see in the videos.
The scenes have removed most of the pre-action stripping and dancing by the males -- which is a plus. I still have some of the scenes from 7 years ago and the names are much different. Instead of the name just being the date and city of the scene, they are now titled like "Party Hardcore Gone Crazy Vol. 17".
Every video I have downloaded has a 1080p option, 720p and 480p option.
The hectic parts are not as bad as they used to be, but they are still using the same venues. The scenes play out the same and can be somewhat repetitive.
I think the niche is intriguing and could be better with some work on the amount of men and amount of "audience". A hundred women screaming and cheering on one model while music is blasting is distracting and frustrating.
It's hard to say much about the amount of content. It looks like it has dropped, but where they have combined scenes, the drop in quantity is most likely because of the combining.
The more I have watched these scenes I am starting to think these would be just as good for men -- maybe better -- than for women. I have been to three bachelorette parties, but never experienced anything like this. Maybe the fantasy is for a male viewer to think this is what goes on at the bachelorette parties their wife goes to?
I'm stuck in the middle on this one. I want it to be one of my favorite sites, but I like the videos I have from the past as much or more than these.
It's a good site by itself that is helped a lot by being in the Tainster network. My score would be a little lower if not for the pictures as they add a lot to the scenes. Good site in a little represented niche. |
|
09-10-19 01:14am
Replies (0)
|
Review
135
|
Leg Sex
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my first attractions to porn.
Pretty and cute models
Leg and foot fetishists will be happy
Unlimited downloads and while not 4K, the videos do have 1080p and 720p download options.
Bonus site called Naughty Foot Jobs is a decent site (for a bonus).
Also appeals to heels and hose fetishists. |
| Cons: |
It’s not a big site considering the niche is one of the oldest in internet porn.
Photo-dominated site that is based on a magazine. Not really a con for me, but could be a deal breaker for some. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I heard of Leg Sex was the movie of the same name, produced by Viv Thomas. I have trouble believing anyone, any producer, can do more with leg sex than Viv Thomas has. I find the Leg Sex name as a niche to be a little frustrating. I always look at Leg Sex porn as softcore. A lot of the focus is on the pretty legs, hose, heels, panties and knowing where the legs lead to.
Even as a straight or curious bisexual female, I know a site like Leg Sex will sink or swim based on the looks of its models. That’s good news, the models are very pretty and while repetitive, mostly look similar to the other models on the site. There’s consistency from scene to scene.
The pictures dominate the site and it’’s not a surprise for me. Leg sex includes a lot of teasing. Teasing doesn’t translate well into videos. Though photo-domiated there are still videos. The main reason is Leg Sex, the site, is based off the magazine Leg Sex.
The pictures are crystal clear and the videos, while not 4K, are available in downloadable high definition files. I’m not for sure that Leg Sex solo is even a good idea,
The navigation is a little different than I’m used to. I’m thinking that’s because most of this content is made for a magazine not a website.
The site is a nice change of pace and if you’re a leg sex fann, it’’s worth joining just to get access to their back catalog,
I do believe the site could push itself ahead with bonus videos from other sites representing other niches.
I signed up using Rocket Pay, which still has the cookie that remembers you and wants to upsell a membership.
I meant to mention in the cons that there’s not a lot of physical sex. The site and content reminds me of what it is – a non-hardcore porn magazine. It does narrow the audience for this content.
The site could be a lot better, but it does only appeal to those who are really into softcore, legs and tease.
I do believe it's limited by the connection to the magazine. We are nearing the days of magazines and even photos being replaced by their digital counterparts. |
|
03-07-23 07:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
136
|
Pink Label
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An interesting site that works as a finder for unique porn scenes.
There are educational and instructional videos too.
Most scenes have subtitles or captions.
Epoch is the biller.
Some of the scenes remind me of early 2000s Vivid scenes which are my favorites. |
| Cons: |
A lot of shorter scenes under 10 minutes.
No dates on the scenes. I don’t know if it’s updating.
No downloads |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is run by the same company as Crash Pad Series that I reviewed. This is a video site that’s not unlike Videobox or sites like that. What is different though, this is more like they found the unique scenes and that’s what they have. It’s not going to be for everyone. I thought some of the scenes were cast poorly. I don’t think this site does the casting. I believe these videos are by other studios. I could be wrong. The scenes are different to say the least. There is one with an overweight transsexual with an overweight gay man. It’s like softcore. I’m sure my mind has been corrupted by all the porn I’ve watched, but I just don’t see that pairing fitting in a softcore scene. There is the uniqueness of that. If a person is into an overweight transsexual and overweight gay man in softcore, here it is. I think that would be really hard to find.
I didn’t see a reason to put this in the cons. I don’t think they film there themselves. A lot of the scenes I liked had strange camerawork. I’m not known for loving hardcore porn, but the cumshot is my favorite part. The camera scans away or to the left. It’s almost like it’s trying to be too artistic. The cumshot is the one part I would want to fully see.
They do have some really good lesbian scenes and masturbation scenes. I like that they don’t stick with the traditional models. You will see a big variety of sizes, looks, tattoos, piercings and I do prefer that.
They also have men masturbating which is my favorite porn niche. It’s too bad I can’t download those to put in my collection. They list those as Gentlemen Handling. You also get a variety in those with some being transsexuals. I have joined sites just for Gentlemen Handling.
I believe what they do is go out and get independent porn producers’ scenes. That’s going to always be hit or miss. And what could be hit for me may be miss for someone else and vice-versa. There are some group scenes, even have some pegging which I sometimes like, but other times not so much. It’s not mostly amateurs like their other site. I recognize a lot of these performers. I know I saw Kali Sudhra and Amirah Adara. Most of the scenes I watched have the same positive the Crash Pad site had. The action is very believable and sincere. That’s going to enter into your preferences. I don’t know how much some people want to see sincere kissing in porn. I like it, but I’m a woman.
Those instructional and educational videos are very interesting to me. They even have a how to squirt video. I always wondered why more sites didn’t try videos like that. I don’t know about you all, but everything I learned about sex was from porn! Why not give us some instructional videos and manuals?
That no downloads part is going to be a sticking point for me. There are a lot of these scenes that I would like to have. That’s a compliment that I would like to download them, but it doesn’t change that. I haven’t been on that many sites over the years. I never really understood the thinking behind no downloads. It’s one of the first sites I’ve been on that has that rule. It just seems like the style of porn they have goes against conventional thinking so why shouldn’t the business practice? I won’t take a lot off for the no downloads, but will take 5 points off for that. It’s a good, unique video site that only needs to fix that no downloads part. Everything else is workable with the site. |
|
06-08-22 03:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
137
|
Next Door Buddies
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site with a sports, athletic, jocks theme.
Updates 3 times per month and has 816 scenes on it.
Videos can be downloaded as can photo zips.
Handsome, athletic guys, but may be more directed at gay men than women.
Categories, search by model, are the main navigation features. |
| Cons: |
Only 17 scenes are listed as solo and I’m not for sure there are even that many. The solo ones show multiple guys.
Scenes are repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
I prefer solo scenes, but these scenes have at least some parts I like. There are naked, masculine men with erect penises. Why is it men don’t have to go through this? Someone really needs to make porn sites aimed at women. The site gives me the feeling of quantity over quality. Please understand that a gay man might see this differently than a straight woman. Some of these scenes are borderline romantic. There’s hugging, cuddling, kissing, and as much as I support those actions, it’s not why I join a gay porn site. The good news is these guys are mostly young, fit and athletic. They get impressive erections, and this is how I always feel about gay porn. I like most everything up until the sex. The sex on here looks like a couple in love. I can’t fantasize about being between two gay men that are in love with each other. I guess I could, but they wouldn’t be too happy about it!
The site is large and it’s just my thinking that is why the scenes are repetitive. There are 816 scenes, each has videos and photo zips. The download options on the videos are 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K on the scenes from the last few years. The photos are generic feeling. There are 20-40 pictures in each set. The first 5-6 are pictures of the guys in clothes. Then 5-6 taking their clothes off. The rest are of the sex.
The categories could be confusing for someone thinking there are a lot of scenes a woman might like. They show 492 scenes with the masturbation tag. Only 329 with rimming. I really don’t know if these categories are very accurate. There are only 610 scenes listed as gay porn, but the site has 816 scenes. What are the other 206 scenes if not gay porn? A gay male friend told me the easiest way to tell if the scenes are just marketed at gay men and not women is to look at the categories on body types. There are 80 “hairy” and only 15 listed as “beefy”. It seems hairy, beefy guys are more for the women to look at. I feel really dumb explaining that as a woman. It does seem like those categories might hold the secret to figuring out the type of “gay” porn I can expect from a site. The two that didn’t help at all are 187 scenes with “big muscles” tag and 164 with “slim” tag. My best description of the males on this site is “pretty boys”. All in all it’s not bad and it has enough scenes you’re sure to find something you like. |
|
12-08-21 02:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
138
|
Brasil Bimbos
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Included in Adult Prime network
Updates once a week
Many dark and exotic looking full bodied Latinas.
Nice tags for easy searching
Four streaming and download options that include 4k |
| Cons: |
Small site with only 25 videos. Every download uses the same file name.
No scene description or subtitles. The videos are in Portuguese.
There are no photos
Condoms, either a pro or a con depending on how you look at it |
| Bottom Line: |
I have never watched porn made in any country in Latin America, so I was not sure what to expect. I thought porn was about seeing beautiful bodies going at it, so how different could it be? The first thing that I noticed was that there were no scene descriptions or any kind of subtitles. They spoke Portuguese and the models fit stereotypes that are sometimes comparable to those in American porn. The men were generally very muscular, very tattooed and most had their hair cut in ways you don’t see in porn made here. Jhoony Gab has ten scenes and has blue hair. Higor Silva has four scenes and in some has blue hair. Oscar Luz is in six scenes, so I guess these guys are pros not amateurs. These three guys are in 20 scenes out of the 25 on the site and one of those is a lesbian four way.
Most of the women have a mixed race, mostly black look and their bodies can only be called voluptuous and hourglass. Not at all thin, they have larger sized breasts and hips. Most have tan lines from wearing bikinis. Brazil is well known for their beaches and if I went there, I would hope to see women like these.
They are what you might expect from Brazilians who have a reputation for having big butts, however one model is an exception. Indians have a diaspora that includes a lot of places, but I never expected to see one on a Brazilian porn site. Indian women are known for being large breasted, but Sumaya Ganesha is not. She does not have a big butt either. She was named after the Hindu God Ganesha, you know the one with the head of an elephant. He is thought to bring good luck, but we are the lucky ones to see her in her two videos. She has a tattoo of Ganesha on her upper right arm.
In a scene labeled as Autoridade Maxima, in English Full Authority, her guy has sex with Sumaya using a condom. I see no problem with that, as I am not sure if they have the rigorous testing for porn performers that we have in the United States. When he is ready, the condom comes off and he cums in her mouth. Is that safe for her? Although the scene has no subtitles or explanation, he has a badge and handcuffs. She handcuffs him to the bed frame and he does oral sex on her until she cums. Her orgasm seems very genuine too. I have never seen a man in porn go down on a woman except as foreplay. Considering that In most American heterosexual porn the woman’s need are generally ignored, the fact that he does that AFTER he cums is a refreshing surprise.
I thought the prettiest model was Lunna Real, who has a young vibrant look in her videos and wears braces. She has two scenes and in one she just devours his cock and makes him cum inside her mouth. She loved it, it looked unscripted and spontaneous that she made him cum in her mouth. The other was a lesbian four way pussy licking orgy where she clearly was the star of the scene. She should be signed up by a major US or European porn producer and I could see her becoming a big star. Such enthusiasm needs to be rewarded.
In most cases the men are darker than the women. However, I am not sure if that is planned. The sets are generally rooms in a modern house, but not the rich looking mansions you often see in US porn. It is hard to say what the basic premise is in each scene as you don’t know what they are saying. Clearly this is not your dull standard two people in a hotel room and they just go at it. A typical scene starts with her looking at her phone sitting on a deck or she is taking a bath. He walks in and they talk for a few seconds and then they are like animals in heat. The cum shots generally were external and In nearly every scene the woman is boringly passive. In a few scenes he cums inside, or he jerks himself off onto her. I want to see the woman making him cum and enjoying it.
The site has tags that work well and the videos can be streamed as well as downloaded in four options including 4K. Downloads were fast enough and are added once a week. One thing missing is photo sets. I don’t care about that, but if you do, there is a way. If you use VLC player you can create screenshots. If you want to create custom clips of just certain parts, the site has this as a feature.
One video had a few seconds of the gorgeous coastline. A suggestion for future scenes is that if they showed more of that beautiful Brazilian scenery, it would make the scenes better. How about some scenes open with her on the beach in a bikini, then she goes inside and finds a man there? Maybe one masturbating?
I think the site has potential, but only time will tell. With only 25 videos it needs to grow. I think as part of a large network it is worth checking out. |
|
11-07-21 09:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
139
|
4K CFNM
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All the videos are available in 4K as well as High Definition
Comes with Adult Prime Network of over 75 studios
The network has no download limits
Nice variety of CFNM scenarios
The downloads were fast
The younger models, both male and female, were very attractive |
| Cons: |
Only 34 videos are available
You never know when updates will be posted |
| Bottom Line: |
I like Clothed Female with Naked Male as a porn theme as the men are there as the object of desire for women. I will check out any site like this, but unfortunately there just aren’t all that many.
The level of variety you do find here is surprisingly refreshing as well as diverse. I found older men with younger women, older women with younger men, outdoor as well as indoor scenes, two on one, even one with five women and one guy, mild bdsm, although one that I found impossible to watch was Ball Busting with Gunther, BBW women, and even a few where the guy was so old and ugly that it stretched my ability to believe it could be true. I can’t explain one in particular that got to me and was my favorite. I guess it was the contrast of two gorgeous young ladies being so enthusiastic with a guy like that.
The sex was for the most part the women blowing the guys, which is commonly what you see a lot of in CFNM. In a few scenes a second or third woman walks in and accidentally sees the action. Many of these scenes had a woman who was watching and masturbating to the action, who then later got in on it. I could see that happening in real life and would like more of that in all porn today, not just CFNM. It adds a touch of believability and is something that I think most women would find an improvement.
The tags for searching does give results over the whole network, not just this site. If you do a search under CFNM , you get some that are not here, giving a total of 58. If you want to search for more videos of the same female star you can, but the guys are not named. The downloads were fast and there were three options, one of course was 4K and another High Definition. The site did not have download limits as you might guess for only so few videos, but the network did not have any limits either.
The site Is rather small and it is hard to tell where its future is. It has been updated nine times so far this year, six in 2020, and 19 in 2019. I don’t have any serious negatives except that the site has only 34 videos. As much as this site was enjoyable, it was just not big enough by itself. The network though is huge with over 75 studios and there are several other older/younger sites if those appeal to you. |
|
10-19-21 12:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
140
|
Erotica X
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Highly polished, glam with a story, porn.
Includes access to 3 other sites, Dark X, Hard X and Lesbian X.
Very high quality and production quality, reminds me a little of the Met-Art sites.
Cliched stories are better than no stories.
Videos are downloadable in 9 different resolutions, starting with 160p and going up to 4K. Maybe I will ask Santa for a 4K monitor this year? The oldest scenes have up to 1080p.
Updates once a week and has 319 scenes on it. |
| Cons: |
It would seem like pictures would be important to a site like this, but the photo sets are limited in number of photos but they do have downloads (corrected error, missed the button).
I have noticed with these softer "hardcore" sites, sometimes the action just falls very flat. |
| Bottom Line: |
I think I'm still earning my porn rookie badge. I joined this site thinking it was a standalone site. To my surprise, those other 3 sites come with it and as a whole, it's a very good deal.
The content here is like reading an erotica book that your neighbor's wife authored. That's not really a bad thing, maybe she's the next Anais Nin? The stories were a selling point for me, but I probably expected too much.
As an example from the newer scenes. Featuring the gorgeous Vina Sky, her boyfriend broke up with her via text message. She calls her best male friend for a shoulder to cry on and realizes she's been in love with the best friend the whole time. Doesn't that contradict the heartbreak she has? She ended up with the guy she's really in love with.
So, maybe your neighbor's wife isn't the next Anais Nin, after all. It's still better than no story. The scenes are very serious feeling. There's not a lot of feeling of raw emotions or passion. It's not bad, but it just seems a little stale like a two day old doughnut.
There's very little variation in the scenes. Most are male/female, there are some solo and lesbian scenes, but in my opinion, not enough of either of those. I think with this narrow of a niche there should be a near equal balance in solo (fantasizing), lesbian (fantasizing and real), male/female (real). It would add more of a connected feel to the scenes.
The quality of the videos are excellent, but I'm not going to compliment the settings too much. It looks like all these couples and people rented the same hotel room. They must have blew the budget on those stories.
I streamed most of these scenes which isn't the best sign. A few are worth downloading, but most of them started feeling repetitive.
I don't understand why they don't have more pictures. I'm not a picture collector or downloader, but I can usually look at the pictures and combine them with what I see in the video to make more of a connection to the scene.
It's good, what I would call safe porn. It's not going to make you think you're witnessing a revolution in porn, but it's good enough to get off to, a time or two. I do think with the 3 other sites combined as a 4 site network it's a very good deal. I'm going to review the opposite site from their network just to show a completely different experience. |
|
11-04-19 09:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
141
|
Social Glamour
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Glamour site that focuses on a small amount of models.
Current Halloween promo for $14.99
Gorgeous models and the feeling they are going for a little more than typical glamour models including a few heavier models that are just as pretty.
I'm not for sure if all these models are big stars or not, but a couple of PU members told me the one on here, Gemma Massey, was a once huge tease star.
Huge photo sets with 250+ photos being normal, can be downloaded and the resolution on the photos are massive 6700x4400.
Easy site to use with a small amount of models, but large amount of overall content. |
| Cons: |
Doesn't look like it's updating anymore. The newest update I've found was March 2019.
Not near as much nudity as I expected.
Videos aren't named videos, they are named "tease" and they are short, less than 5 minutes with annoying techno music in the background.
40GB Daily Download Limit, hard to believe you would hit it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I guess there's a part of me that enjoys looking at beautiful women posing, in pretty clothes, and not just having sex. This site is good for that.
We also could be looking at the site's biggest weakness. This site is really pushing the limits of "is it cable television or porn?"
It's interesting how the site is made. They have only 26 models, but they have 3,488 photo sets and over 4,000 tease videos of those 26 models. I can't say I have ever seen a porn site like this one. I can't even for sure say this is a porn site.
I watched 22GB of videos one day and didn't see anything more than full nudity with no masturbation. It is very artsy feeling. It is difficult to grade it just because the content is so high quality and there's so much of it, but for me, not exactly a porn connoisseur, it leaves me feeling like they left out the porn.
I'll list a few of the most popular models just in case anyone is a collector or fan...
Charley S, Gemma Massey, Lexi Lowe, Mica Martinez, Holly Gibbons and Anastasia Harris.
All of these models look like what I would describe as high-level or top-tier models, but I will also add none of these models look young. They seem to fit more into the mid 20s to mid 30s age range.
The picture sets are the stars of the site with resolutions I've never seen 6700x4300, picture sets that are 700MB in size. The level of tease in them is questionably high. Questionably because it's all most of the photo sets have. They have one photo set of Anastasia Harris that has 300 photos in it. She starts out in a one piece bathing suit. By picture 300 she still has the bottoms of the bathing suit on. That's a lot of pictures to only progress from bathing suit to topless.
I'm sure there is a market for this type of content, I'm just not sure I'm part of it.
The videos are even more frustrating. I once watched some videos on Met-Art and the teen to early 20 models, danced around, usually nude, but the shadows and camera angles stopped much from showing. These videos are of what look to be and are listed as older women that are dancing around, not even nude for 4-6 minutes.
A couple of the more experience PU members told me about Gemma Massey. She is one of the ones that gets fully nude in her videos, but she just dry humps a bed and rolls around.
I will also mention the daily download limit. It shows at the top of your screen with a bar to keeps track of your daily download activity. It counts videos you stream too. I downloaded a few and they are 1080p.
I think if a person was a huge fan or collector of any of the models on this site this would be a treasure trove for them as most of the models have 150-200 photo sets and as many videos, but it still doesn't feel like porn to me.
It also hasn't updated in 7 months.
There are some really pretty models here with outstanding photo sets, but most just leave me wanting to see more, even the sets with 300 pictures. It's a good site, but needs more oomph to it. |
|
10-28-19 11:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
142
|
Trystan Bull
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I will readily admit, I was expecting a big, muscular, brawny guy. He’s good-looking and it’s not just gay scenes. He’s not big, muscular and brawny.
These gay solo sites seem to have more of the type of material I like and this one has some. Though, the use of the word “solo” in gay porn is different than straight porn.
It has 110 scenes, and the downloads are unlimited.
Some of these guys make me wonder how “gay” they are. Which goes into the content I like.
Easy to cancel, uses a version of Gamma’s billing. |
| Cons: |
There’s a distinct difference between the gay, bisexual and solo scenes. The gay scenes are not good even for a straight woman. This guy does not seem like he’s into gay sex.
Scenes are too short, a lot are under 20 minutes.
Some of the categories don’t make much sense – non-nude and softcore? |
| Bottom Line: |
The name Trystan Bull makes me think of a large, muscular, bald, powerful man. A+ for the Marketing Team. Trystan is an average sized guy that looks like he could maybe be an extra in a Marvel movie. I don’t know if the compliment shows in that. He is handsome. He has that superhero actor look.
The site is one of the most confusing gay sites I have ever been on. There are 15 scenes with women. There are 28 solo scenes too. That’s nearly half of the site’s scenes. Trystan seems to be more into the women than the men. And it has one scene that I think would be perfect way to blend porn for gay men and straight women. Trystan is looking through a gloryhole at a very muscular man who is masturbating. That wall between the guys keeps some of the gay parts since it’s two men and it keeps them just far enough apart that they are not as obviously gay for the women viewers. These 43 scenes with women, solo and this one gloryhole scene really helps the score of this site. If I was more attracted to Trystan, the score would be even higher.
There is bad news: The scenes are short. I think one was over 30 minutes. The rest are under 20 minutes and some are close to only 10 minutes. The ten oldest scenes also only have 240p and 480p downloads. The rest have everything up through 1080p, but no 4K. The picture sets are okay, but you can’t download those.
The good news besides the HD videos is the women are really pretty. Which also leads me to wonder about how much Trystan is more into women. Usually when you see a woman in a scene with a “gay” man or bisexual men, they can be pretty, but are usually average looking. The women on here, at least one, I think is a big star. And most of the women look like they could be stars themselves.
I do like the way they film the solo scenes. Some sites do the male solo scene in the least visually impressive way with the guy sitting on a couch or recliner. Trystan’s solo scenes include outdoors, on the porch of a house, it could be a major difference in female and male solo scenes. I want to think I could just accidentally walk up on a guy masturbating. While, I think the female masturbation scenes try to give you the feeling of the female invited you to watch her. Trystan’s have that more spontaneous feel to them.
I am going to score this site higher based on how much I liked the 43 scenes I pointed out. It seems like porn anymore is more about finding scenes you like instead of just taking a chance. To add what I was saying about the difference between solo male and female scenes, the solo male niche doesn’t seem to have anything to do with “solo” except every scene features the main star. It could be with other people. I know from my first porn site job ever, Nubiles, about 12 years ago, solo female porn means masturbation. Just when I say that they’ll change it on me. Good site if you like the sound of the 43 scenes I described. |
|
12-08-21 02:28am
Replies (0)
|
Review
143
|
Manko 88
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Uncensored Asian/Japanese porn that is quite good.
Small site with only 30 scenes, but it does get two updates per month.
Some of the scenes are really outstanding including in length and depth of the scene (see cons).
Video quality is excellent with up to 1080p on all videos, all are downloadable.
Downloadable zipped photos that are of high quality 2700x4000
Some threesomes and outdoor scenes too. |
| Cons: |
The scenes greatly vary in length and how interesting the scene is. The longest scene is 67 minutes and five are over 60 minutes, but there are others in the 15 minute range. The depth of the scenes (kinkiness and actions) varies because of this.
One of the first times I’ve watched Asian/Japanese porn and have to say this needs subtitles. One of the scenes is called, “Mother-in-law hungry for cock”. There is so much dialogue going on in the scene, but I have no idea what is being said. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is worth a look for those interested in Japanese porn without the censoring. All of the males in these scenes are not Japanese. I have an interest in Japanese porn from reading reviews about how creative it is and how much of it relies on a story. That clearly is happening in some of these scenes, but without even a basic knowledge of Japanese, I have to just go by the context of actions. I do believe this is going to sticking point for me with this site. While each scene is titled and tells me what the scene is about, there’s not even a synopsis. All of the scenes have the same synopsis that tells you what to expect from Manko88, not the scene itself.
There are only 30 scenes, but there are 2 updates per month and each update comes with a video and photos. The videos and photos are downloadable and from what I can tell it is unlimited. Something that has held back my interest in Japanese and Asian porn is the use of creampies. Based on the very good user features, the niches dropdown box says 23 of these 30 scenes have creampies. I am sure creampies are common in real sex – Covid has me in a drought, but I don’t get the use of creampies in porn. This is performance sex not husband and wife trying to make a baby sex. Cumshots are and always have been one of my favorite parts of porn.
The video quality is good enough though I don’t see any with 4K. They do offer 540p, 720p and 1080p. Which is good enough for me, but maybe not for those wanting 4K. The pictures are 2700x4000, I am not technological enough to know if that is telling me they have the cameras to make 4K videos, but that’s not a dealbreaker for me.
Some of the scenes, like the mother-in-law hungry for cock have what looks to be a sexy story. The son-in-law has the mother-in-law’s panties and is sniffing them. The mother-in-law sees him from a short distance, but out of his sight and starts masturbating watching him sniff her panties. I don’t need the talking to get that part. It then turns to dialogue and turns into sex. There’s so much being said that would either add or take away from this scene, but it’s gibberish to me. I do like the site and the longer scenes. There seems to be quite a lot of taboo going on in these scenes. I would even say a few are more extreme like a black man helping his Asian male friend get his girlfriend off with an array of Magic Wands, threesome sex and what I wouldn’t expect from a Japanese site.
There are cutesy scenes with the pretty Asian models wearing cat or bunny ears (I’m from Chicago, I don’t know animal ears). There are scenes with the female models nude in public. One of the female model having a guy use a dildo on her in the car while driving around which leads to a blowjob and cum in the mouth. There’s a lot going on here that I like, but I really get the feeling this could be even better if I had the slightest clue what they’re talking about. I like the site overall, there’s good video and photo quality and no censoring. I did try a Japanese site with censoring a few months ago and couldn’t even review it. I’m not porn-adapted enough to get around the censor mosaic. This site fixes that problem. It is worth keeping an eye on. If there was more balance from scene to scene, at the very least a synopsis explaining everything or subtitles, this site would score really high for me. It still is considering I have no idea what’s going on besides the sex. |
|
10-19-21 01:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
144
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with access to the Dogfart Network of 23 Interracial sites
Updates once a week
You can rate each scene.
Four download options. The best is Full High Definition
The site has some of the hottest black men in porn
Some of the best natural chemistry I have ever seen
More than 1000 videos |
| Cons: |
Costs extra for download option for 4K
Older scenes are not in HD |
| Bottom Line: |
In my opinion, interracial sex pairs those of any two races, however, in porn it generally means black men and white women. This site has that, but not only blond women, but also white women of all hair colors, as well as black men with Latinas and also Asians. The site also touches on a few specific niches, such as large men and petite women, as well as some scenes are older/younger. Some scenes are gangbangs. The contrasts are often sharply drawn and very striking to the eye. I saw a scene with Cindy Starfall, who is tiny at 4’10 and whose partner Mandingo has a 12” penis. Seeing it in her mouth was just incredible and oh so memorable. I love contrast in porn and this is about as good as it gets in my opinion.
In most porn today, the women have the star power and are the major focus. Let’s face it, the guys are pretty much interchangeable. In some porn, they don’t even get billing and you never get to know as much as even their names. In some types of porn, for example, Point of View, you may never even get to see their faces.
The guys on this site include major black male models. Some are so well known for their scenes that they even have their own websites. This site has a lot of stars that have a large following, such as the legendary Lexington Steele, Sean Michaels, Prince Yahshua, Wesley Pipes, Shane Diesel, and Mandingo. These men are very, very dark and have penises that can only be described as huge, maybe even the biggest in porn. I don’t think they make condoms this size. If you read pornstar interviews, the female models often mention these guys as among their favorites to work with as they are kind as well as considerate sex symbols for many women. These female models are seasoned professionals who are among the most popular. I have seen them before on other sites, but I feel that here many of them have their best scenes. I don’t know if it is the size or the color of these guys, or maybe both, but something works well here. One of my favorite scenes, for example, stars Cindy Starfall, who has some of the best Jerk Off Encouragement as well as overall sexy talk in her oral sex videos. On this site her face just simply lights up from the first glimpse at these penises and their size. Suddenly the talkative becomes speechless. She must have seen quite a few penises in her life and she should know an outstanding one when she sees it. A few of the stars that I really like are also here, such as Esperanza Del Horno, Eva Angelina and Gina Valentina.
There is a chemistry in these scenes that is a hallmark of interracial porn. I think that both the men and women are on their best behavior and give performances that show how they feel about making these scenes. Far too much porn is repetitive and by the numbers dull, but these come across as the performers finding a natural attraction. I personally don’t care that much that they are of different races, but I do care a lot that the models look like they love doing this kind of sex scene.
It is mentioned on the site that they have won numerous XBIZ and AVN awards, the porn version of the Academy Awards. These are given by their peers in the industry and show how well made the scenes are. You see an attention to detail that is outstanding, from the makeup, to the camerawork, to the lighting and of course the direction. I don’t know if there are classes for learning how to make good porn, but these videos would be great as teaching tools.
The sex itself is straight to the point and there is no real storyline. Mostly what you get are more like simple scenarios such as going to visit your boyfriend. He is not home but his brother is. The woman is a stripper at a bachelor party. The woman is interviewing men for a job as her bodyguard. Many of the scenes are three ways, many four ways and some are even more. The site is easy to use, with one new update per week. There are no download limits mentioned and I did not hit any. There are an incredible more than 1000 videos and photosets, but the frosting on the cake is the access to the rest of the Dogfart Network. You have a similar site, but age focused, called Blacks on Cougars, an interracial lesbian site Zebra Girls, two gay interracial sites as well as a few sites that are rare in porn, featuring black women and white men. |
|
10-19-21 12:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
145
|
Bums Bus
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of Lets Doe It Network
Uses a trusted biller
The site has 134 videos.
Sometimes silly but still fun.
Attractive stars that I am not familiar with |
| Cons: |
Needs more subtitles
Download limit of 100 videos per month for the network
Has not updated in almost three years |
| Bottom Line: |
I have never been a member of a site that is not in English, so I was not too sure what to expect. Well, sex is not about talking, so I kept an open mind. As part of the Lets Doe it Network, I joined for a few sites that seemed promising, but this was not one I had thought about, to be honest.
Some of the videos have subtitles and it was not hard to imagine that the scenes where there were none were probably very similar. The guys joke, kid around and in general act silly, like college students on a break. The videos even have a feel of being produced by amateurs. Your average scene shows them driving around in Berlin, looking for women to entice into either showing some skin or, if they are really lucky, she has sex in the van. The showing the skin idea was that they would offer money to see her breasts.
When I was a college student, I felt college guys were not very mature. Now, I felt the introductory parts were like a film about the college guys themselves and the women were to be seen as conquests. Because the videos were overly long, I found that I skipped ahead to the sex parts as that is what I was there for. I thought the scenes were rehearsed and not spontaneous and it was hard to imagine myself as the woman. The scenes that started off in public were just ok. My two favorite scenes had the tables turned and had a woman cruising the streets for guys to pick up. Although I could never do that myself, it was a fun fantasy that I could relate to.
I don’t know anything about German porn, so I don’t know if the women were amateurs or pros. The guys were about average looking and seemed to be of about average size down there. The cumshots were ok, not huge or anything exciting to watch.
The site is easy enough to use and there is a tag system for searching. There is a monthly limit of 100 videos for the network. They have 134 videos but when you see the download limit of 100 per month, I prefer to keep those from the other network sites as opposed to these here. For me the other big negative is that the site has not updated in nearly three years. I would not join for this site alone. But, the rest of the network is an astounding value. |
|
10-19-21 12:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
146
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of the Reality Kings network, it’s a very large MILF site.
815 scenes, each scene includes a photo set and 35-45 minute video.
If you add-on downloads the majority of scenes are available in 1080p or 720p.
Scenes vary between woman in control, man in control.
Overall, good production values with many of the scenes having some funny dialogue and setup.
If you’re not into downloads the streaming player works well. |
| Cons: |
Downloads cost extra, $15 per month for them and the download upgrade does include photo sets.
Too much clutter, ads, upsells
Site stopped updating on June 12, 2019. |
| Bottom Line: |
Milf Hunter is a hardcore site about a man on the hunt for Milfs to have sex with. That’s how it started; they eventually went to a format where there was a different man in nearly every scene. The sex is common hardcore, blowjobs, doggystyle, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, cumshot.
Despite the site no longer updating it is still one of the biggest Milf sites available with 815 scenes and each of those videos average around 40 minutes. There is a playful nature to a lot of the scenes including light exhibitionism, car flashing and some scenes starting in public locations.
I think the downloads are worth it for a month or two. They have good quality videos with nearly all having HD (720p or 1080p) download options and I haven’t run into a download limit. Maybe they removed the limit once you’ve paid for downloads? The photo sets are screen captures and can be downloaded with the download upgrade. It’s still a worthy site for those into the Milf niche. |
|
01-27-20 07:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
147
|
Joy Mii
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A pretty porn site where the models are all pretty and have a natural look.
Smaller than I expected with only 193 models, but they are 193 very pretty models.
720 video scenes and for some reason, 719 photo sets. All are downloadable and excellent quality.
I think it's important to stress how pretty and natural the models on here are. I haven't seen any implants and if there's tattoos, I've just missed them.
They have solo, lesbian and hardcore scenes.
Updates twice a week.
It has been around for a long time. I guess it's why I expected it to be a bigger site, but this could go into quality over quantity. |
| Cons: |
I didn't realize this is a softer hardcore site. A lot of the scenes in this softer hardcore genre just come off as generic to me and that is just an opinion.
It needs more variety. The scenes have these gorgeous models in them and it's like they're the sexy part and the sex is just the bonus.
The scenes are just straight to the point and short. Some are less than 20 minutes. |
| Bottom Line: |
My pros/cons might look like I don't like this site, but it's not true. This is a good, very straightforward porn site with some really gorgeous models in hardcore action.
The site has been around for almost 10 years, so they have only averaged about 70 videos and 70 photo sets per year. What I find myself running into here is I find I model I really like and they only have a couple scenes of her, while other models have 10+ scenes. That is subjective to my taste, but it doesn't help me enjoy the site.
These are all professional models as far as I can tell. They look familiar and there are even a few big name models.
They have 350 male/female scenes and some of those are threesomes. The other 370 scenes are lesbian or solo. There's no way to separate the solo from lesbian scenes.
The navigation for the site works well except that they list solo and lesbian together. The model list isn't the most friendly, it is a vertical scrolling page with one model per section. Clicking on any model brings up a list of her scenes and photo sets.
The video quality is one of the brighter spots for the site. All videos have 1080p, 720p, 540p, 270p all in .MP4 and a 720p .WMV version. The streaming player works very well.
The photo sets have three downloadable versions, quickview 534x800, collector's edition 800x1200 and poster size 6000x4000. That's a big difference and the file sizes show it. The first two were 8-12 MB each, the poster size is 400 MB. These are photo sets, but they could pass for screen captures as they are from a video scene.
I would compare the site to Sex Art, X-Art, and just about any site with the word Art in it.
Whether my tone has sounded negative or not shouldn't go against the site. I am just a little disappointed in what I was expecting. It not a bad site, but I also don't think it's a great site. |
|
11-26-19 12:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
148
|
Sex Art
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A Met-Art inspired site about sex. Hardcore, lesbian and masturbation.
Male and female models are very attractive.
The site works as it should. There are no gimmicks or tricks required to understand.
Big site with 1,550 photo sets and 1,178 videos.
The site updates each day.
Not the best way to find out this pro, but after a cancellation mix-up, their support staff fixed it (within 24 hours) and added a month to my membership at no cost. |
| Cons: |
Potentially the most unheard of con -- it does not feel like porn. It feels like I am watching a one hour drama series that slipped a sex scene in.
I think the extra month of Sex Art was also because of my complaining about the "staff selection" releases. These show up in the regular updates and require you to pay separately for each one. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was hesitant to join Sex-Art. I am not into the more hardcore, kinky content (usually), but I had seen a few samples from their site. The samples were what I would describe as plain, vanilla and when I watch porn, I expect more than that.
It is hard to look over the content since all of the models, male and female, are attractive. The problem I see is it does not feel like I am spying on a couple having wild, passionate sex. I feel like they invited me to evaluate their performances. I am not a seasoned expert in hardcore porn. There is a reason I prefer solo or lesbian scenes. I like the added intimacy of solo porn. The lesbian scenes, as I have alluded to in previous reviews, shows me what I always heard happened in college, but never experienced it.
A nice looking guy and nice looking female having sex in positions I have had sex in is nothing exciting. I do like those scenes, but they are not going to turn me into a fan of hardcore porn.
The lesbian scenes are not much different than the male/female scenes. They look like professionals having professional sex. Our minds like to believe porn is dirty. It is not dirty on Sex-Art! Either the male/female or female/female really like each other or they were paid a good amount of money to make me believe they really like each other.
The solo scenes are very good, and that was my complaint I sent Sex-Art when I had the cancellation problem. I saw all these solo scenes in the staff selections, including titles like, "My Favorite Fetish", "Turning Myself On", "Watch or Watched" and "Raw Orgasm". There are almost 50 of these types of scenes in staff selections. They all sound like scenes I would really be into.
They are $4.99 each for members. I am not new to online porn, but I am new to this style of selling someone a membership then expecting them to pay more for your premium content. I paid $5 for the Sex-Art membership. Why not sell it for $25 and include those staff selection videos? Obviously, 50 x $5 each is a lot more than $25, but as women start joining porn sites, the porn producers are going to realize we are more into bargains and thinking we are getting something more for our money.
I would not feel the separation between the regular Sex-Art scenes and the staff selection scenes if the Sex-Art scenes did not feel vanilla. I bought one of the staff selection scenes, titled, "My Favorite Fetish". I would not pay $5 again for one of these scenes. First, it was only 16 minutes. It was a solo scene, it was not that unique. The model has a hose or stocking fetish. She inserts her stockings inside of her and then sniffs and licks them while she masturbates.
It left me feeling like the site is not as great as it thinks it is. I still believe it is a good site and would appeal to others more than it did me. Their quality is excellent it is just not a site I would normally join. I should have looked more into it before joining, but for $10 including the staff selection video, I do not feel ripped off.
The pros covered the large amount of content and the site works very well. I have joined other sites listed as female-friendly. I do think it is disambiguation to call it female-friendly. All that has meant on the sites I have tried is it is very soft hardcore. Are they saying it is friendly to the females in the porn? I don't believe that. I believe it is marketed at women that want to see their favorite erotica book brought to life. They even have erotica-like synopsis of the scenes.
These are from one of the most recent male/female scenes, "she emerges from the pool with water dripping down her voluptuous body". Another is, "She frees his rigid cock" and ends with, "Her orgasm is wet and explosive as they slam together and she jerks out his load rapidly, both of them gasping for breath from their exertions."
That is not porn. That is from the minds of my middle-aged, unhappily married friends, put there by the stack of novels in their bathroom. Maybe I need to try a more hardcore site. With all my complaining and bitching, it is still a very good site if this content appeals to you. I do not collect pictures. I think that probably hurts my view of the site too.
It lingers way too close to cheesy for me. |
|
07-16-19 01:19am
Replies (1)
|
Review
149
|
BJ Raw
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A site I was first introduced to by Adult Time. It is “raw” blowjobs.
Not a big site but does have 62 scenes and most are long considering the niche is limited. It updates once per week.
If you like women rimming men this site has that in nearly, if not every, scene.
Video download quality is up to 4K with multiple options.
Pretty models, that is one part that surprised me for this niche.
The guys are well above average endowment and the women put every inch to full use. |
| Cons: |
I have joined a few blowjob-focused sites in the past and keep thinking there will be more than just regular suck, to and from head movements and there is, it’s rimming. Which I am not into. They could easily add a different variation in some of the scenes.
Anything I say is going to come off as “being too critical”. Are there not enough scenes of sucking, to and from movements and rimming? There’s more that leads me to try sites like this one. Maybe they don’t realize this is going to become repetitive? |
| Bottom Line: |
I admittedly get frustrated with sites like this one. The video quality is very good. Besides 4K, they have 1080p and 360p. They also have downloadable photo zips that are pretty good. Those resolution options may not even please some people. The newer scenes replaced one of the two versions of 1080p with 4K. The oldest scenes have 1080p in two bitrates, then falls all the way to 360p. Am I thinking too much? They have the 720p for streaming. I don’t see the point of having 360p if you’re not going to have 720p. It says mobile, but my cellphone is 1080p.
The frustration is more about the content. These scenes are about several things. One, to show how pretty the woman’s face is. It’s very close to a POV-style video. The second part is to show what the woman will do besides blowjob. There’s ball sucking, ball licking and probably deepest rimming I have seen. The models’ pretty face isn’t near as pretty with two balls on her forehead and a mound of body hair wrapping around her face. That’s mostly what you will see during that part. She then switches to blowjob and shows how far she can go before gagging. The women are good at blowjobs. The biggest compliment I can pay the man or men, is that there’s a constant erection and it’s above average.
The scenes are longer than I am used to in this niche. Some are around 30 minutes even. That’s a long time to watch a woman bury her face and stretch her throat. I have been told many times in my profession, not to complain, unless I have a solution. It’s pretty easy on this site. Does no one in porn use edging the dick? Does no one use vibrators on the frenulum of the dick? Add some teasing, do something different. You could tell me the name of the site is BJ Raw, I should expect blowjobs. There’s as much rimming and playing with the balls as blowjobs. I like this niche. I would like to see it try and advance a little. I won’t name the Blowjob site, I first encountered with this niche, but it has 20 times the scenes this site has and has the woman doing as much as these women do. This site looks like it’s trying to be a niche site that draws people from a certain fetish into it. They’re not doing anything that different than any other full hardcore site. I do believe they could change that.
There are only around 60 scenes, but it is updating weekly, and the models are generally very pretty. The settings are better than you get in normal porn scenes. It moves around throughout the scene. The setting can even start outside then move indoors. It feels like they are going in the right direction, but they turn back around and just do what is expected. If anything about porn has worn on me, it is the feeling that I am watching the producer’s fantasy. That’s fine if I am, but I shouldn’t be paying for someone else’s fantasy. Switch it up a little. I would recommend watching it on Adult Time. I did take the upgrade offer to it. I have a year subscription to Adult Time. They seem to send me these partner offers about once or twice a month. I should have looked more into the actual BJ Raw site before agreeing to join it. I had one of those turn out to be a very good separate site.
This one is not bad. It is repetitive. One of my most watched niches is this one. I like seeing the nude man. It just doesn’t do enough to make me see the word “raw”. I thought each scene would have some variation. I don’t know how men feel about this part. I noticed it in a lot of these scenes. The female twerking. I’m as tired of that as seeing the same 3 actions happening in blowjobs. I’m giving it what I would call a slightly below average score. There is a lot more they could be doing with nearly 30 minutes per video. Maybe someone will get a laugh out of this. I felt like pushing the woman’s head back while she was doing the rimming and saying, “I think it’s clean enough!” Spit, polish and shine. |
|
03-08-22 05:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
150
|
Bel Ami Online
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gay site that has a lot of solo scenes.
Some familiar faces especially Sean Cody, but I didn’t know a lot of these guys.
Not quite 1080p on the newest video downloads, but close at 950p (never seen that before)
Averages close to a daily update.
Around 3,000 videos and nearly 800 photo sets.
Navigation is good enough. |
| Cons: |
The ongoing problem for females watching gay male porn: Most of these guys fit the “gay” category. To put that bluntly, the guys are not that masculine. I will even pay a compliment that’s not a compliment to me – pretty.
This is one I didn’t look into enough before joining, lots of uncircumcised guys and I believe that’s more common with European sites, which this site is. It’s just not my “thing”.
I have seen mentions of a daily download limit of 20GB, but I don’t download that much so I can’t verify it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have said it before, being a female, trying to find porn of solo men is becoming more and more difficult. Add to it that the male needs to at least be masculine and it’s just not very common. This site adds the uncircumcised guys and I’m mentioning that since I know some people love that. It is just making it more difficult for me to find porn that I genuinely enjoy.
The good news is Bel Ami Online has over 1,000 solo scenes. I will even add some perspective to this, when I was 18-22, I probably would have loved every guy on this site. As it is, being around 40 now, a lot of these guys are just way too young and innocent looking. I have the same problem with looking at young females in porn. My favorite site years ago was Nubiles, but it is no longer a favorite site just because I don’t feel right looking at the very young women on it. I am sure there is some production and planning magic at work. It’s like the young females with bobby socks on. They’re playing to the youth of these guys. I do have a problem with that with both genders. I just don’t like it.
I have no idea what they are going for with the download resolutions. The scenes I have downloaded are 816p and 544p, I’m not the most technically strong person, but why the odd resolutions? It’s not a big deal until I see the numbers. They do have a good update schedule. It’s close to 1 new update per day. They have a large back catalog of scenes with over 3,000 videos. The photos are not near as good as they should be. This site is reminiscent of glamour female sites. There should be more focus on the pictures. They can’t say much since they do have zip downloads and recognize the importance of pictures. The ones I downloaded are 1137x774. When was that ever standard or even 1200?
The navigation works good enough, that just means I click the tag for “solos”. One part that continues my belief that they know how important photos are is that some of the videos are photography sessions. Just throw the video out on those. I pay to watch porn not to watch someone take photos. Even with the solos tag, you still get “couples” mixed in! The number problem on the resolution combined with solo and couples’ tags showing up on the same scene, makes me think they can’t count. There’s one or two. Solo. Couple. It can’t be both. I will admit that the site is probably really good for gay men. The guys are mostly slender or muscular-lean. I do believe the landscape of gay porn and rising popularity of it is making the gay solo scenes that much more difficult for straight women to like. There is some butt play and showing their buttholes off.
Overall, for a gay man, this is probably a top 3 site. The models are pretty for guys. They’re in shape. Nice bodies if you’re into that. I prefer the masculine, some body hair, a little beefier build. These guys make me think they’ll steal my vanity mirror so they can fix their hair. They do need improvement in the photo resolution and figure out what’s going on with the video resolution. The videos look fine. It’s why I said the resolution listing is throwing me off. I would compare this directly to a gay male version of Nubiles.net There’s just not much excitement or as others have said heat in the scenes. It’s stoic and kind of dull for a middle-aged woman to watch. I won’t let my biases play much of a role in the score. I am going 80 on it just because they could have a lot better pictures and I don’t like the photography session videos. The other is I just don’t feel any passion in the scenes. I have watched the solo and a few of the “couples”. It’s going through the motions porn. Definitely good enough to recommend for those that are more into just what they see. That’s probably the high point of the site, especially for gay men. |
|
07-09-22 10:55pm
Replies (0)
|
|
