Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
126
|
Hot Guys Fuck
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The brother/sister(?) site of Bi Guys Fuck. Will need more description to describe the site.
Attractive males and female models. Mostly one on one action.
Large site, but most of the scenes have two videos, one is a behind the scenes. It makes the site seem bigger than it is.
I thought about listing this as the #1 pro. If you join with a gift card it’s cheaper. I used a $17 gift card and received 25 days, that’s 68 cents per day. They offer two paid memberships that are $30 and $40 for 30 days or $1 or $1.33 per day.
Gay men should check this out as well as bisexual men. And maybe women, even though it’s listed as for women porn. |
| Cons: |
The site is glitchy. I clicked join and it took me to the “secret menu”. I clicked join again and it took me to advertisement for their penis pills. I finally got to a join page and joined with a gift card. I don’t trust a site with this many issues.
Don’t stone me for this, but this site is no more directed at women than any other porn site. These seem to be gay and bisexual men. Calling these guys “hot” makes me think it’s aimed at gay men. Most of these guys are not masculine or big, muscular guys. These men are more in the “twink” category. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this after enjoying Bi Guys Fuck last month. Some of the first scenes on Bi Guys Fuck are from Hot Guys Fuck. They have the watermark. That is easily the feeling I get from these scenes. One of the things this site advertises is the men get as much camera time as the women. I don’t know what porn they have been watching, but that’s fairly common unless it’s POV. I will even say the men get too much camera time on this site. Maybe during the cumshot or the moment of penetration. Those are views women like to see. Showing the guy’s face midway through the scene isn’t doing anything for me. I have watched a lot of solo female porn. I don’t even like when the camera focuses on the woman’s face during the scene. I’m paying for porn not headshots.
This is very much a gay/bisexual male site. The sex is as good and believable as most porn sites. You know from watching the scenes that these men are medicated. Every scene has an advertisement for their penis pills. You do get to see very erect men and large cumshots, but when the men are presented as the “eye candy” it kind of removes the interest. I’m not into “pretty” guys. Gay men are. It may say “for women”, but it’s not for me. I’m a traditional woman. I’m nearing 40 and I have known a lot of gay men and watched a lot of gay porn. I wonder if Bi Guys Fuck maybe hurts my view of Hot Guys Fuck. On Bi Guys Fuck it’s normal for the scene to be split into multiple downloads. One of the downloads will be the guys together while the woman watches and masturbates. The other will be one or both guys taking turns with the woman. That is what these scenes remind me of.
There is padding in the site size. There are 2-3 updates per week. One is a behind the scenes video. Maybe those would be more interesting, except, those are 2-3 minutes long. They get 1-2 questions. Those are released as a new update. It’s only updating with a new sex scene every 7-8 days. That’s still not bad. I’m going to say something that I felt while watching multiple scenes from this site. A lot of the guys are prettier than the women and the guys are not that pretty. There are some pretty women on this site, but there is reality in if you put a less physically attractive person with another person, there’s a chance the other person will look more attractive than they really are. I see that in some of these scenes. I do believe everyone on the site is attractive. That would be a 5-6 on a 10 scale. Only a few of the women even reach an 8. They do have those women in more scenes than one.
The videos, from what I am seeing, do not have 4K. Bi Guys Fuck also didn’t have 4K. I don’t have a problem with that. They do have 1080p, 720p and 480p. There are several parts to this site that are going to make most people feel like there’s a hollowness to the site and content. Besides the constant advertising of their penis pills. They also have a “secret menu”. Members are the only people that can see it. It’s just the same thing as the regular scenes. They hype the “someone returns!” Why even do that? It’s gimmicky-feeling. Would I be wrong in saying young gay men are really into surprises and the dramatic return of a favorite? I say that knowing my best friend is a gay man. He has been my friend for 28 years. I know when he was younger, he was very dramatic and he loved surprises. It’s an eh for me.
Even with what I’m going to call a negative sounding review, the site is good, the sex scenes are good. But when half the scenes are useless behind the scenes videos. Every scene has an advertisement to start it about penis pills. I have to go to the secret menu to find more behind the scenes videos. I don’t care about HIS personality or his hobbies. How much longer will women be subjected to these stupid stereotypes? That doesn’t hurt the site that much for me, but I believe for a more obsessive person, it could be really annoying. If they dropped the ads, removed the secret menu and put the behind the scenes videos in their own section, it would be a near 95 site. Instead, there are nearly 800 scenes and what you find out is they didn’t do these behind the scenes videos in their earlier days. What they have done consistently is make sure to show the guy’s butthole. I will also mention the scenes that are two guys with a female, the guys can’t quit looking at each other, their smiles, their dicks, their buttholes. I am going to give it an 85 with major reservations. They have a good site that could be great. |
|
03-08-22 05:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
127
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cute, playful, fun lesbian scenes.
Site updates twice per month and currently has 510 scenes.
All models are pretty or cute or a combination. Most are young and slim to medium build.
Alternating settings in the scenes breaks up what is a formulaic product.
Newest videos have downloads up to 4K. Picture sets are also high quality and downloadable.
The tags are useful (basic) and non-confusing like many sites use. |
| Cons: |
It is formulaic. The scenes last nearly the same amount of time from scene to scene. You see most of the same positions from scene to scene. The different settings at least present a hurdle to work around.
Not much dialogue and what dialogue there is, I can’t understand. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is very appealing to my eyes. The models are young, cute and pretty. It’s softcore to regular lesbian content. Lots of kissing, touching, giggling, some sex and the models are just as happy when the scenes end as they were when the scenes started.
The first site I ever joined was Nubiles. This site reminds me of the lesbian scenes on Nubiles. I feel like, as a few other PU reviewers have stated, I am starting to get too used to this style or porn. It is still good and can’t deny the models are some of the prettiest/cutest I have seen on a porn site, but I believe like a person that marries just for looks, what is left once you’re used to the looks?
I don’t think this site is one directly aimed at lesbians or even bicurious women. It’s more about the eye candy. There are double or triple (threesome scenes) the pretty, naked, sexual young women on your screen than usual. I shouldn’t say the dialogue is absent. Some of the models do speak English and these are their known words, “Yeah, yeah, oh fuck, yeah, yeah, just like that, yeah, yeah”. I call that not understandable since I am not there and not feeling it. This is a site that has been around a long time. The newer scenes do feature some women that speak that 7-word English vocabulary. The point of that is lesbian porn has improved greatly on even sites related to this one. It’s because the models are more descriptive in their language. Having never been with a woman. I do not know what it takes to make me say yes, yes, oh fuck. I believe this is an example of a site directed more at men. Where just watching these sexy, young women, get naked and roll around with each other IS enough. It still works for me, but I do think they need to improve the interaction between the models.
As I mentioned the site has been around look enough to have 510 scenes and to still be producing two updates per month. The videos have up to 4K. The age of the site is important in relation to the quality of the videos. There was a slowdown of updates on this site from the early to mid-2010s. The scenes during that time have 480p, 540p and 1080p. While the newer scenes have 9 download options. The scenes from before the slowdown top out at only 540p for downloads. Based on the number of pages, that looks like about 50% of the scenes only have up to 540p. I am not going to be that hard on the site. The newest scenes with the high quality downloads still equal in or around 250 and the only real flaw with those is the formulaic feeling. If you’re more into it for just seeing pretty, sexy women, you won’t notice the formulaic parts.
Good site that I believe has to improve in the dialogue to keep up with the newer lesbian sites. |
|
02-09-22 06:47am
Replies (0)
|
Review
128
|
Mother Fucker XXX
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A blend of older/younger and cuckolding.
Large site with 914 scenes, but no longer updating.
Good quality downloads on close to half of the scenes.
Some rare videos that I used to have under different names. That could be a big positive with this site.
Nearly all niches of straight porn are covered. |
| Cons: |
Not for sure I agree with the name of the site. There are some scenes that are much older women. Some are just younger women. There’s nothing holding the theme together.
I believe all these scenes come from DVDs. About half of the scenes max out at 480p download. I downloaded some. They look okay if it’s a scene you want.
The navigation is not very good. It’s because of the misleading title and tags. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site caught my eye with some DVDs that I used to have. Those are named differently on this site. The previous versions I had were titled, “Screw My Wife”. On this site those are titled, “Lifestyles of the Cuckold”. I always liked those scenes. If you’re not familiar with those. The older man that is in every scene is what made me recognize the scenes. I don’t know his name, but he is an older, bald man. He gets a little involved in some scenes. The main part of the scenes is a more endowed man having sex with a wife while the husband watches. This older, bald man just sits there and watches too. That was my main reason for even looking at this site. I wanted those and downloaded the near 30 scenes they have just from that series.
Looking further into the site, I noticed there’s no real connection with the theme. There are some older women with younger men scenes. I did not like those very much. I believe that older/younger porn interest is in older men with younger women or older women with younger women. I do not see the excitement from the younger men about having sex with older women. One of the series title tells a lot about the content. It is titled, “I was eighteen, fifty years ago”. Yeah, that’s not too sexy to even watch. There are others that are a little better, the “We wanna gang bang your mom”. It is better.
There are even fucking machines scenes on this site. The models are not that old. Maybe 25-30? I think it's just a site where DVDs have been thrown together as series. I can’t say it’s terrible or that bad. I did download around 50 scenes from it. I don’t even see how the cuckolding scenes fit the theme. Those are gorgeous top-shelf models. I do like the cuckold niche. There is pegging. The women look the same age as the men. Even those gangbang ones, those models look similar age as the men.
Once you get through those everything else seems to be just standard porn. There is interracial and I’m positive the male model is similar age. There is content here that is probably hard to find unless you join a site like Videobox, which I have no interest in trying to sift through. I did notice a series called, “Raunchy Redheads”. I am a natural redhead. We don’t get enough coverage in porn. I checked those out, those are okay, same feeling as the other scenes. One of the female models in the redhead scenes looks maybe 19. The video quality is the only other part to talk about. The scenes from 2010 and before are all 480p. The scenes after 2010, have mobile up to 1080p. It’s a good site to look at once or twice. The part I found funny. The older women on this site are really older. That’s not “mother” porn age. That’s granny. Take it for what it is. You may find some scenes you have misplaced. There are over 900 scenes. I would recommend it for those that like pegging and cuckolding. They have a good selection of those. I know neither of those niches are abundant. |
|
02-09-22 06:26am
Replies (0)
|
Review
129
|
Next Door Casting
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The first time I’ve seen a gay casting site. It has his plusses and minuses.
There are 76 scenes that feature a short interview, some solo play, then some sex.
The video quality is very good. All 76 scenes have up to 1080p downloads.
The interviews can be too much information or interesting. A very different vibe from female casting videos.
Has at least one part I will talk about later in the review that is a major turn-on for me and I think for other straight women. |
| Cons: |
I don’t know if they stopped updating or the Covid problems possibly halted production of these scenes. I mention Covid only because these are supposed to be amateur male models. I assume most pro models are tested.
One thing I will never find sexy is a male stripping and teasing like a stripper. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has a feature that I see as a major turn-on. It really could just be one for me. The guys start off dressed and walk into an office. They are not aroused. The difference in the grow-er and show-er dick. That is fascinating for me to see and watch. Some of the guys drop their pants and underwear and look to be 2-3 inches at most, within a minute or two, they have grown to 5-7 inches. There’s a lot of turn-on in that for me. I don’t have the same turn-on with the show-er type. You also get at least some masturbation at the beginning of the sex casting part.
The interview can be interesting. Some of the guys say they are really bisexual. Others talk about when they knew they liked guys. Maybe it’s just that I haven’t seen gay casting before that makes this so interesting to me? I am used to female casting sites where the questions tend to be, “When did you lose your virginity? How old were you when you started masturbating? What is your favorite position?” These interviews are going into topics I can’t say I have even heard gay men I know talk about.
The sex in the scenes doesn’t seem as genuine as in the sex in the scenes on their other sites and that now makes me question female casting videos. These gay casting videos seem more like the casting director is trying to really see what the aspiring model can do, while female casting seems to be more about the casting director just getting sex.
the site stopped updating right around the time Covid became a pandemic. I hadn’t even thought about the possibility of how a casting site with amateurs could be forced to stop. I don’t know if pro models stay tested so it’s not a problem but bringing someone in off the streets into an enclosed office and exchanging bodily fluids would make the risk even higher. This is a site I would like to see continue or some other site to try. The interviews are interesting, even the too much information ones.
I don’t think this site would convince anyone to join the network, but it is the only time I’ve seen a casting site for gay porn. With the getting to watch the grow-er grow added, it made it a site I liked. |
|
12-08-21 02:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
130
|
Group Banged
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Updates every two weeks, which is good for a site that has rare videos
Over 140 videos and photo sets in the archives
Uses tags for searching
Download speeds were ok, not the best I have ever encountered.
Navigation works as it should. |
| Cons: |
I don’t speak German and they need subtitles
Many of the women are not much to look at and the guys are not either
The file names are not unique or helpful |
| Bottom Line: |
This site was a bit different from the ones I usually join. The Adult Prime Network has many sites I found interesting and this was not one I was thinking about when I signed up.
My taste in porn is for the women to be attractive, but not necessarily the most beautiful I have ever seen. They just have to be real and have a quality that makes them relatable. I like good looking guys with nice bodies. They don’t have to be carved statues either. I like sex to be energetic, but not a freak show. This site says they use 100% amateurs, and that would work for me.
The site is in German, so I was never any too sure what they all were saying. But, this is porn and models speak with their bodies. I should be able to turn the sound off and still be turned on. I have never joined a German site, but some of these models are not amateurs. My guess was that if the scene description had their name, there must be a reason. Sure enough, if you do a Google search they do actually have pornstars. Mostly they are better looking than the models in the other scenes.
But this is a site specializing in huge gangbangs. Imagine 20, even 30 guys banging a woman. Maybe even more if there are two women involved. The sex is often intense and the scenes long. Some are so long that I can’t call this anything less than a test of sexual endurance. I have to admire the women for doing these scenes, but how many models would be willing to do them? I suspect very few and I think that is why the standard for the attractiveness of the models is low. Many are overweight, a bit over the hill by porn standards, and in general not the best looking. Don’t get me started on the guys. These are not exactly pornstars either. They are not fit, often don’t get hard and many of them have dicks so small that, well you can use your imagination as to what I would say. Many of the guys wear a mask. I understand, but that is not great porn.
What the guys need is a bit of organizing. When they are not in the action, they sit on chairs, stand on the side or in the back. They stroke themselves to stay hard, but mostly it just ain’t happening. What they need is what I once heard called is fluffers. These are women who stay offscreen, and help the guys stay hard. Now that is a job I can have a fantasy about. Hmm. The guys don’t use condoms, but I don’t like them anyway. However in scenes like these I keep thinking about that. If twelve guys just came in her pussy, would you think you should too, without a condom?
Mostly the cumshots are external though and that is ok. I like to see men cumming and the possibilities are great for some interesting scenes. If 30 guys cum, some of that just has to be worth watching. I also liked that many of the models wore stockings or nylons.
As a site, I found it annoying that the videos did not have unique names. Calling a scene 1080p_fullcomplete is not ok. On the other hand there are three options to download and stream videos and the best is Full High Definition. You can make your own clip and the site has 96 already made for you. This way you can skip most of a long video and just focus on a section. I found watching them in a loop to be the way to go, or should I say cum. You also can download photosets or make a slide show. Mostly they are screen shots and the sets have large numbers of photos. I saw one that had 156 and they were a nice 4000x2667.
It was hard to follow all action with so much going on, but I found these videos hit and miss. Some had parts I could watch over and over and some scenes just don’t do it for me. |
|
11-07-21 09:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
131
|
Sinful Raw
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An interesting, episodic porn site that is in its very early stages.
The scenes are very professional with high production values.
All videos include a 4K download option, but there are currently only 16 scenes.
It’s updating twice a week and will say the scenes are long enough and good enough to at least show the potential this site has.
There are downloadable photo zips as well those should not overlooked. The resolution is 2700x4000 and there are excellent lighting effects that show up more in the photos than in the videos.
The scenes have added elements of added kink to them, like cloth masks, orgies and I’m going to say what the site reminds me of – Pure Taboo. |
| Cons: |
I believe a person could get confused with the titling of the scenes. There’s part 1, part 2, part 3 of each titled scene.
I don’t know a lot of pro models, but know most of these. This is the downside to a professional site. There are models, especially males, that I remember seeing in porn over 15 years ago like Erik Everhard. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has a lot of potential. Whether they reach that potential is going to be questionable. The videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. The photos can be downloaded and are 2700x4000 resolution. The photos are some of the best I have seen and it’s because the scenes all have a dark feel to them. The photos use lighting to highlight the areas you want to see. It feels like the site is produced by someone who has a lot of experience watching good porn and they’re trying to follow in those footsteps. It does lead to some problems.
I have very little experience with porn before 2010, especially hardcore porn, but I recognize these actors/models. One scene is Barbie Sins and Erik Everhard. I know I have seen scenes with Erik Everhard in scenes from the late 1990s. I’m not saying there’s a problem with that, but I have learned in my time watching porn that the longtime pros just don’t appeal that much to me.
Since this is episodic porn (that’s what happens when you use the same title and put an ascending number after each scene), I can say I don’t see much connection between the scenes of the same title. There is Dirty Thirty, Dirty Thirty 2 and Dirty Thirty 3. The first one is a professional businesswoman who is out of town on business and seduces the bellhop at the hotel while talking to her husband on the phone. Dirty Thirty 2 is a professional businesswoman who hires a male prostitute (Erik Everhard) to do for her what her husband can’t. Part 3 is similar in theme, the woman plays the role of an escort finder (pimp?) and brings in her top male performer to satisfy a woman and he does so in less time than the woman paid for, so the female pimp has sex with him too.
There are some interesting takes on the ways these scenes play out including a 3 part called Mine For A Moment. They even have one 3 part series titled Rock, Paper, Scissors. The newest series they have is listed as the First Sinful Orgy. This is where you see the positive of professional work. There are 9 people in one of those orgy scenes and you can see all 9 of them at various points in the video.
The size of the site with only two updates per month definitely doesn’t help, but depending on the viewer, I believe they will either love these scenes or not even be interested. There are tattoos, implants and I do think that comes from the professional part of the site. These are mostly well-known porn stars maybe taking a different approach to their porn. There is another part to like and not to like. Nearly all of the scenes are 27-30 minutes long. That’s the professional part again. I do understand, as an author myself, plot, crescendo and ending are all important and need to be timed perfectly. That’s in a book. I don’t know if it translates as well in video, especially porn.
I’m going to say something I rarely say and that is I don’t find most of these women very attractive. I know others do. I recognize nearly every name, but we are going into subjective preferences.
The orgy scene which has made up the 4 newest scenes does give me the feeling of potential. Maybe they started out with known pros they knew they could count on to give consistent performances to show the developing story and plot in the scenes. That does make me believe it has potential. My personal advice would be to pull away from those veterans of porn and put some newer talent in the scenes. It reminds me of when I watch another Will Smith movie. He’s a great actor and has a great personality, but it’s another Will Smith movie. The 4 scenes of the orgy has a lot of females and males I’m not THAT familiar with. I recognize a few, but most are new to me. There is a lot of playing on the emotions of cheating, betraying, even a little cuckolding. I like it and will keep checking back on it. I believe they’re on the right track. |
|
10-19-21 01:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
132
|
Zebra Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A very unique concept for porn, lesbian interracial.
I have never found another site devoted to this.
Many of the scenes are 2 on 1, black on white or white on black.
A site in the Dogfart Network of 23 interracial sex sites
You can search by site or by the whole network
Some scenes focus on older/younger or large size differences. Early scenes are verbal domination. |
| Cons: |
Irregular updates, only seven this year
Only 93 videos despite the fact that the oldest one is from 2007
Too overproduced and the models too scripted. See below. |
| Bottom Line: |
The Dogfart Network has 23 interracial sites. In porn that means black men and white women. The site called Zebra Girls is most unique in porn, I think, as it is only white and black women. I would like for there to be a few scenes with women of other races, but porn is never perfect and often just not that imaginative either. I have found a scene here or there of interracial lesbian content on the internet, but I am not aware of any other site focused exclusively on this.
The oldest scenes are of light verbal domination, but come across as more playful than as BDSM. I thought most of these were not to be taken seriously, but more as a fantasy geared at men. The more recent scenes are a bit more complex and have a little story, but this is still not a typical soft lesbian site. They use tongues both on their partner’s pussy as well as sometimes the tongues go a bit farther back into their ass. Like many lesbian sites that are aimed at men, there is also a bit of toy play as well as tribbing.
The production values are really excellent with great lighting, makeup work, costumes and in general the women here look as well as I have seen models anywhere. What seems to me is that there is not much passion or chemistry, whichever term you prefer, and the models are doing what they are told. I like porn that is a bit less scripted and more whatever the models are into. I would like to see the producer step away and give the women a bit of freedom to do whatever the genuinely feel. I can’t be sure, but I fear the producer thinks that lesbian sex at its best is what men see as a fantasy. I have spoken to a few real life lesbians and they tell me that their sex is not so perfect or so polished. It is a lot more spontaneous and has a lot more unplanned variety. They don't put makeup on before sex either.
One thing I really liked is that there are many scenes that are 2 on 1, both white on black as well as black on white. This can lead to scenes where the idea for the scene starts out as ordinary, but it quickly becomes one where two of the women initiate the sex with the third being a sex object. The possibilities are many as in the scene I describe next, my favorite of all of them.
I saw the contrast between the models as one of color, sometimes of size and occasionally even a theme of older/younger. A good example of a difference of size focus is the scene with two very large black women, Victoria Cakes and Jayden Starr. The manager of the women’s clothing store is mini sized Lexi Lore. She looks half the size of either of these two women maybe even smaller, but seeing her paired with both of them was a sight that appealed to my imagination. When Lexi started “booty worship” it was enough for me to do what comes naturally.
The site seems almost a forgotten one in a large network as the updates are about once every two months. This year there have been seven and that is about the rate the site has been growing since it started in 2007. The earliest videos predate High Definition. Using the site is easy and you can search by site or by network. At 93 scenes it was enough to get me to like the site, but more would be better of course. |
|
10-19-21 01:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
133
|
Girls Fuck Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Billed by Segpay which is very safe to use.
Inexpensive at only $14.95
Mostly American pornstars that I like
Links to discounts for other sites
Professional camera work and directing |
| Cons: |
It has not updated since May.
Only 35 videos
Only three download options and the best is Full HD
There are tags for searching for what you like
Does not come with other sites |
| Bottom Line: |
Despite the fact that there are only 35 videos and there may never be another update, I really like this site. Although I have never been with a woman sexually, I find the idea very appealing. I find most lesbian porn sites are not to my taste with a lot of overacting and fake moaning. In those mainstream sites, the production values are low and the appeal to women is nonexistent. In contrast you find here that the actual sex is very realistic and a joy to watch, with nice production values. Instead of the ordinary quality you see In most porn, these scenes look like they were made by video professionals. A few even have simple, but interesting special effects. The scenes are explicit but not overdone sleazy. There is a lot of licking, toy play, scissoring, fingering, strap on play, pussy shaving and even the use of a sex machine by the two women.
I recognized many of the models as they are Americans known for lesbian sex on other sites. The younger models are fresh with enthusiasm and seem to really enjoy the scenes. These younger models are portrayed as innocently exploring sexuality either with other young models or with older more experienced women. Some themes portrayed here are college age schoolgirls enjoying each other, sorority members getting it on, boss with younger employee, babysitter with mother. This gives the scenes an appeal that is using a uniform fetish, a college fetish, older/younger lesbian as well as dominant/submissive roleplay as there is also some light BDSM. The most popular scene is Girls Naughty Naked Night Out, which is a four way. Four young ladies of college age go to a strip club, where they laughingly enjoy seeing a stripper on a pole. They give her tips, but she does not strip or get in on the fun once it starts. What you see are women in short skirts, well made up, who are going out for fun as none have a date that night. This sounds like a fantasy I might have, or was something I might have done when I was younger. They come across as a group of good friends who know each other well. I could imagine myself having been in that group, getting giggly and silly along with them. This is porn that captures my imagination and is not just made to satisfy men’s fantasies about imaginary lesbian encounters. They do what comes naturally as a result of having been friends first. You can see the action evolving as the heat builds. They got hot and then I got hot. What could be better than that?
My only complaints include a minor one. When you open a page on the site, the video starts on autoplay. If you want faster downloading you have to turn it off. A much more serious matter is that the site appears to not be updating any longer. With 35 videos, I would appreciate a lot more. I want to ask if they have any plans to keep the site actively growing, but the only customer service links were for billing problems. What you do get is well worth joining for. |
|
09-05-21 06:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
134
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with the Lets Doe it Network of sites
Irregular updates, but they are about one every two weeks.
Uses tags for easy searching
Four choices for video downloading. Full HD is the best
More than 200 scenes
Really gorgeous models made up to look their best
Great production values with a few small visual special effects such as fading in and out |
| Cons: |
Limit of 100 downloads each month
Too many ads after you log in |
| Bottom Line: |
I have never had a lesbian experience and don’t identify as one, but this site gave me reason to wonder. As a woman, I can enjoy watching orgasms, both male and female. I love men’s bodies, but women’s bodies have so many interesting parts, not just the one. What I saw on this site was just amazing. It may be the hottest girl/girl site I have ever been a member of.
The models are naturally beautiful without even trying. The site has them perfectly made up and they wear clothes that look great on them too. The women are a combination of classy and erotic. They do things like brush their hair, change outfits and have non erotic fun with each other as part of the prelude to the scene. They stare into each other’s eyes and turn each other on even before they touch one another. Presex erotic kissing is done well in every scene. These women are very feminine, unrushed, gentle and sensuous. For the most part, there is an attempt at a story, but not all that much. At least there is a logical progression into the sex, which is more than most porn has. The ages range from about 18 to 30, from naïve and exploring sexuality, to knowing exactly what each other would like. I believe that only another woman can know exactly how to please a woman to the max. Sometimes there is mutual masturbation, fingering, scissoring, the use of toys, strapons, and vibrators, but mostly there is a lot of slow erotic licking down there. The scenes easily shift from seductive to very explicit. These women are really into these scenes or they are better actresses than I think they are.
Some of the setups include roommates, step sisters and best friends. They know each other and then the action builds on that. What is missing though is that they don’t talk to each other. I am sure it is because they don’t speak English, or at least not well. They have subtitles in some scenes, but tone of voice and choice of words could have been very erotic. Sexy, playful talk turns us girls on. There are many outdoor sets and there are a few pool parties. There are also many indoor scenes in elegant places we could only dream about. The locations are an important part in making the scenes into a girl’s fantasy. I could easily imagine these women are on a once on a lifetime vacation. The camerawork, editing and general production values are some of the best I have ever seen on a porn site. I feel like I should be watching them in a movie theater. I can see watching these scenes with a partner or two and we would both get turned on together.
Mostly these are one on one scenes. Despite the range of ages, the pairings don’t play to that. There are a few solo masturbation scenes, but not many. There is a sprinkling of three ways and even a four way. As a site, it was easy to use and there are over 200 videos in the library. there is a download limit of 100 scenes per month, more than you can download them all in a monthly subscription. It also comes with a nice network, lets Doe It, but this is the only girl/girl site in it. |
|
09-05-21 06:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
135
|
Quest For Orgasm
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Comes with Lets Doe It Network
Labor Day Sale price of $9.94 for a month
Great looking pornstars and some I think are amateurs
Highest quality production values
Uses tags for easy searching, however searching is across the network |
| Cons: |
Monthly download limit of 100 videos for the network as a whole
Only 80 scenes
Has not updated since September 2017 |
| Bottom Line: |
For me when I think of the word quest, I imagine a long complicated story with a hero looking for something rare and difficult to reach. In contrast, this site is about heroines finding female sexual empowerment by masturbating. These heroines could easily be me or really any modern woman. I could also imagine these videos being used as a teaching guide for women on how to satisfy those urges we all get. This quest can be fulfilled with a site like this showing how.
The women are all portrayed as pretty, but not different from you or me. The scenes start with interviews, with both them and the interviewer having difficulty with English. This helps me see their sincerity when they answer questions about their education, hobbies and non sexual interests. They laugh, they smile, they explain and it all makes me feel I know them and want to learn more. A few are described as pornstars, such as the superstar Alexis Crystal, but mostly they appear to be naturally beautiful young ladies who want to make a little money doing what comes across as what they do every day in their personal lives. Porn interviews generally don’t hold much interest for me, but these I loved.
The scenes vary in length, but the interviews are about a third of each scene. The models do what they said they like, using fingers, a few videos have fisting, dildos, other toys, but especially wands. Some videos would work well as commercials for wand companies. The orgasms are depicted as real and I am sure they are. In some the expressions on their faces are an indicator of the intensity, and in many their whole body shakes. I see myself in these models and their videos.
The feeling of the site is that the production is professional, even if some of the models are not. They use multiple cameras and the scenes focus changes as necessary. The makeup is great and so are the locations. As there are only 80 scenes, I was left wondering why there are not a few more. Surely there must be many more models who would be willing to do scenes of this quality. They are made to look their best and portrayed as women to be appreciated. But, the last update was four years ago.
This site comes with the Lets Doe it Network, which I really loved. Right now there is a special low price of $9.94 for a month and this site alone is worth a lot more than that. |
|
09-05-21 06:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
136
|
Fucking Glasses
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
01-27-20 07:30pm (Update History)
Reason: Technical problem that the site fixed.
|
| Pros: |
*Added 20 points to score. My membership started out saying it was a trial even though I paid full price. A few days later, the trial part was removed and I had full access and downloads of all scenes.*
I took a risk on an interesting premise and can't say it's bad, but the experience was. The content itself is good.
The concept is recording sex with what I believe are complete amateurs while wearing glasses that record the action.
Very high quality 1080p, I assume that's high quality for recording with their eyeglasses.
A lot of content, but there are multiple buts in this, they have 122 videos and over 1,000 photosets just on this site.
It was not advertised as a network, but once inside it has 15 other sites and says a total of over 1,000 videos and 90,000 photos.
They use Epoch as the billing agent. |
| Cons: |
It took 30 minutes to access the site as it kept telling me my account doesn't exist even though I was using the username and password they sent me!
Once inside the members area it says my account is a trial. It was $15. I have access to I'm going to say maybe 20% of the videos. The others have a pink X on the them and say not for trial members. To see those, I have to upgrade and pay more money. I'm not an angry person, but what's the fucking point of me joining a site for $15 a month then telling me it's a trial that doesn't include everything?
Their frustrating first login was made worse by the login page not being secure. I'm guessing when someone hacks my non-secure login they'll blame that on me too. |
| Bottom Line: |
I saw an advertisement for this and I really thought it was a site about women with glasses. After taking the tour, I saw that it's about video camera glasses recording the pickup, the sex and whatever else goes on (talking, getting to know, etc...)
Here's just a random thought from a scene I watched. Nerdy girl in the library, guy walks up and starts talking to her, they end up in what looks like a hotel having sex. It became very confusing. She had on glasses. The recording wasn't from the guy's eyes perspective. I don't know if they even know what Fucking Glasses is based on. The part that surprised me was this very full network that came with it. There's a reason for that, Fucking Glasses hasn't been updated since 2014. These other network sites have been updated and most of those are NOT for "trial" members.
Just focusing on Fucking Glasses, I have access to TWO of 112 videos.
So, I went ahead and upgraded since I do like how this content looks. It's not worth the trial + upgrade price. The full price came to $44.95. It was $29.95 to upgrade to full membership.
It does seem to be amateur content and it looks like any other amateur site. There's times where the cameraman looks like he/she has a clue and there's time the cameraman looks like he/she is watching a fly on the wall. There's too much going on in some scenes with more than one couple and the one couple scenes are surprisingly formulaic for amateur porn.
These are the sites included with the network.
Fucking Glasses, She is Nerdy, Tricky Agent (their marketing team), Mom's Passion, Make Him Cuckold, Young Courtesans, Disgrace That Bitch (can't make this up), Private Casting X, Trick Your GF, X Sensual, X Massage, Brutal X, Kinky Family, Spy POV and Debt Sex.
The more I've signed in I've noticed there seems to be a hub site called Dirty Flix or that's what the network is called.
The sites amount of content ranges from 1 scene to 368 scenes. With full access they do have 4K on the newer videos and even though I believe it's amateur content it feels more like a Reality Kings Lite or Brazzers Lite.
My opinion of it has went up and down since joining. Since I'm still a member, I don't know if there's a way to join it without going through the $14.95 trial and upgrading for $29.95. At best, this is a $19.95 a month site and that includes downloads.
They advertise 1,000+ videos, 90,000 photos and 620 models. That's not really a very high amount for 16 sites.
The majority of the content is straightforward male/female sex and it follows the pattern most porn sites follow. You can tell I'm more on the down side of my feelings towards the site as my membership is nearing the end and I feel like I wasted $45.
I am figuring price in with my score since if I didn't pay the extra price I wouldn't have been able to access 80-90% of the content. I can be nice about it and say they should look into a new way of billing, a more honest way or I can be blunt and say there's no way I would recommend this site for $44.95. I wouldn't even recommend it for $29.95.
There are a few of the sites that might hit a fetish for some like the Sell your GF site where a boyfriend agrees to let his girlfriend have sex with another guy while he sits and watches. Another is the Fucking Glasses site and She is Nerdy which has the nerd/cum on glasses fetish, but overall, I just can't recommend this network until they figure out how their site is going to work.
They have an updated box on the network in the members area that says once your membership is expired you can still access the site, look at the photos and a few of the videos, which is exactly what my $15 membership fee got me. I'll just write this one up to experience and try to be more careful about joining sites. I went to the site with a different browser and sure enough, it says nothing about the membership being a limited $15 trial. It even says multiple ways to download and stream.
If I had received all the content it said I would for $14.95, I would have scored it in the mid-80s as a network. As it is, I wouldn't score it over a 65. |
|
01-14-20 12:29am
Replies (2)
|
Review
137
|
Asshole Fever
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A large gaping site that focuses on anal sex (not a favorite mine)
They have 863 scenes. It updates twice per month.
Video downloads do vary with some scenes being old, but the newer ones have up to 4K.
Downloadable videos and picture zips (as long as you pay for the subscription with downloads)
Very pretty models, not exactly the type of models I expect in anal porn. Most are European. |
| Cons: |
It is subjective, I am not a big fan of anal porn, but if you can do more with it than just 25 minutes of anal pounding, it will at least interest me. I find a lot of anal sites, the scenes, come off as punishing. This one doesn’t give me that feeling.
There’s not much variety. That goes for the style of scene, the looks of the models, the body types, the settings. There’s a lot of sameness from scene to scene.
It’s anal porn, that’s all the story you need and get. I’m just being honest, not sarcastic. |
| Bottom Line: |
I will give this site some credit. I usually do not like anal porn sites. I am halfway through a year subscription to Adult Time and am working my way through the sites. This one is acceptable enough anal porn. I want to put laugh out loud. The models are very pretty. Most of my early interest in porn was Nubiles. I am familiar with the European models. Most of the anal sites I see today are American. You have the, am I going too far, brutality of the punishing anal scene? It’s not me condemning it. It’s me questioning if the producers of this type of porn only does what my last con said? You just don’t get a lot of story or build-up or lead-in. It is something I believe porn producers have to start thinking about. It is why I am going to give this site some credit but am also going to talk about the problem I have with this genre and how it is filmed or produced/directed/written. One of the newer scenes is a gorgeous woman named Jayla De Angelis. She is swimming nude; she goes up to her balcony and is masturbating. The neighbor is watching and he’s masturbating. She’s giving him a blowjob by 4 minutes in. Between the 4-minute mark and 10-minute mark, there’s some blowjob, then anal for the last 15 minutes. It seems lazy. I know women that have anal sex with their husband or boyfriends. I have never heard one say, after 9 minutes foreplay, he jumped right in her butt. The bigger picture to what I am saying is, I think the anal focus, plays to such a large fetish for so many men, it lets the producers/directors/writers, just cruise control through the scene.
This site at least has some non-anal content. It will turn to anal before the scene is over and that’s why I am at least giving it some credit. They have another site that is called 21 Erotic Anal. It has 267 scenes on it and I like those. That is figuring into my review of this site specifically, it does look like the producers of Asshole Fever realized to try a more erotic, sensual version of the site with 21 Erotic Anal. I just wished there was something separating foreplay straight to anal.
If you add the 267 scenes on 21 Erotic Anal, you end up with 1,130 scenes, when adding those to the 863 scenes on Asshole Fever. You are going to have to go through those and find the ones that you like. I think the anal genre is geared directly at those that love anal sex. If that’s you, you may love all these scenes. There are good download options from 160p to 4K on the last few years. Before that, HD with 720p and 1080p as the highest options. I can recognize the quality of the scenes. It just depends on if I’m being completely subjective or objective. It’s a good site for what it is. |
|
02-09-22 06:21am
Replies (0)
|
Review
138
|
Men Over 30
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very large gay site that has some very large men on it.
The site has 1,373 scenes and is updating twice per month.
Good categories that helped me find 25 solo videos.
Not a typical gay male site except for the sex. Big, athletic, even burly men.
I have to think this is one of the oldest, still active gay sites, the earliest scenes are from 2005.
Newer scenes have up to 4K |
| Cons: |
As burly and masculine as these men are there are only 25 solo scenes out of 1,373. I do think the number is higher. The oldest scenes don’t seem to be tagged.
Starting to realize gay sex only has two places to stick it.
Oldest scenes are only 480p. |
| Bottom Line: |
I thought seeing two big, burly, masculine men, naked and rolling around together would be sexy. It is some of the scenes. Some of the scenes are a reminder that most men are not near as flexible as women.
The standout for me are the 25 solo scenes. This is good, male solo porn. Maybe it’s because they’re older? I am very confident there are more than 25 solo scenes too. The last one listed when using the solo category is from 2012. The site’s content goes back to 2005 and two of the oldest scenes are solo. It looks like they just started tagging around 2012. Big, burly, bearded guys masturbating is almost as good as I expected it to be. These guys give the imagination enough to work with and convince ourselves they are masturbating for us women, but then they’ll decide to hop up on their knees and spread their butt cheeks for the camera. The solo scenes are good.
The sex scenes are better than on other gay sites I have watched. The main reason is these guys are masculine and don’t make me feel like a man is more flexible than I am. I watched one gay scene from another site where the guy was having anal from a split. These scenes let me at least think and imagine these are guys in jail and they’re just having sex with each other until they get out and can find a woman. It’s more believable than most guys watching 4 gorgeous lesbians and thinking they’re going to invite him to join them!
This site is really good and more updated than most gay sites I’ve been a member of. You have the 4K video downloads. Two updates per month. Over 1,000 scenes backing the updates. It also has very good navigation. The categories section is helpful as are the tags. It’s not a cluttered site and only one small ad at the bottom of the pages. It just has a real professional feel to it. I would like more solo scenes, but solo gay just doesn’t seem very popular. Am I just delirious for thinking guys masturbate a lot? If you look at the porn industry, it makes it look more like women are the only ones masturbating. |
|
12-08-21 03:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
139
|
Sweethearts Classics
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fresh faced teens you probably never saw before
Tags for searching
Part of Adult Prime network of over 75 sites
Adding scenes once a week
Uses Epoch as a biller |
| Cons: |
All remastered videos. The quality varies quite a bit as some of the original videos are not possible to convert to modern quality. However remastered is better than unwatchable quality.
The site needs growth as there are almost 50 videos, but there are many, many more older scenes that need a makeover sitting in the Club Sweetheart archives. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site had its origins as a magazine in 1995 and was then called Club Seventeen. The models have always been of legal age, 18 and older and this was just a name. Recently it has been renamed as Club Sweethearts and is the main site within the Adult Prime network. As many of its scenes were filmed before High Definition became available, many of the better scenes need an upgrade. Those scenes that have been redone are now on this site, Sweetheart Classics. As of right now, there are almost fifty scenes that have been remastered. I hope many more are redone as the content really caught my interest.
Much of the porn made in recent years has been dull and too much like they are made in a factory. Many scenes are ten minutes of this, five minutes of that and another ten minutes of another act. The models change, but the scenes are almost clones. A few years ago, porn was a bit more creative.
Seventeen of the scenes are groups with a lesbian theme. They are named: lesbian swimming team, lesbian garden party, five girl lesbian pop group, lesbian orgy, seven girls and a bottle of oil, all girl water polo team, lesbian orgy at the stables, lesbian sex Olympics, four girl dildo party, lesbian army invasion, three sporty lesbians, four girls, two water bikes, four girl lesbian carwash, ballet girl orgy, five girls in a foam bath, a three girl get together. There are seven other lesbian scenes. There are also seven group scenes with boy/girl sex. The mix may change as they add content, but as of today it seems to me to have a theme of a lot of group lesbian sex scenes that I like. I read once that in porn today they do not use very many models in a scene and that is to reduce cost. In a group scene, you can see a lot of interaction in ways that modern porn does not attempt. There is always another pussy to be seen, always another one to be licked, always another with a toy or a wand being used. Sometimes there are two or three on one and often the pairings switch. It reminds me of a sex buffet.
The models are young and thin white women from Eastern Europe. I am not sure how many went on to a porn career or how many have their only scene here. It seemed to me they are fresh and eager with that special glow of exploratory sex. I thought the models added some natural sexiness to the visuals. In reading some of the replies to the videos, members have posted that some of them have another porn name that they have used.
I can’t say there is much I don’t like about the content, but for me they seem to use more toys and wands than I would prefer. That may be a hint that they are made for male fantasy or it may just be that is how lesbian porn was made then. I am basically nitpicking, but I like more tender lesbian sex and a bit more of a relaxed pace. Don't get me wrong, I liked the scenes here. One of my teachers once told me there is always room for improvement.
In all fairness, as much as they try to improve the quality of older videos, they don’t look anywhere near as sharp and clear as newly made High Definition ones are. There is only so much you can do to enhance the quality, but there are many scenes here that I would not have even bothered trying before they were remastered. The site was easy to use, the tags let you have an easy search, the download speeds fast enough and with over 75 sites in the network, more than enough to keep you busy. |
|
10-19-21 01:10pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
140
|
My MILFz
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All 85 videos can be downloaded in HD
Updates are twice a month
Part of huge network that includes over 75 studios
Epoch is the biller |
| Cons: |
Not much age difference between the models
Search not just for this site, but whole network
Just nitpicking, but only six lesbian scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
MILF refers to an age of about 25 to maybe 40. Actually I have even seen stars older than that called MILFs. I guess it means stars that are not young and not really ready to be called older. I am in that age range myself. I don’t think that I am young and innocent any longer and that does not bother me at all. I feel women get sexier as they get more confident with age.
When I logged onto the site, I found that the men were close to the age of the women more often than not. Even when the differences are noticeable, the scenes don’t play up the age difference much. I found a few scenes where it was a pairing of student with teacher or with the principal. Mostly though, it was not important. This is not a site that can be called older/younger. Besides those scenes, there were a few that had a concept, such as maid and boss. In those the age difference was not the center of the video.
There were a few things that I rather liked about the site. The first is that nearly all scenes are of models from the UK. I love those accents and admit a Brit with an accent makes me pay attention. Many of the guys are good looking, as well as nicely dressed and groomed. I could go for that. Many of the women looked slutty, which works for me as a porn fantasy. In contrast though, in some scenes the women were dressed in a very feminine manner with nice dresses or skirts, nylons, pretty panties etc.
Most of the sex was interesting and kept me watching. However, I feel no scene is ok without a great cumshot. Most of these were externals and I prefer those to internal ones. The guys were above average in size compared to guys in real life, but by porn standards nothing special. They got the job done. Even the internal scenes had an unusual focus when the women put their fingers inside and scooped out some cum.
There were only six lesbian scenes out of the 85 on the site. I thought they were at best just ok. I did see one lesbian four way, but the other scenes were all one on one, both the lesbian scenes as well as the boy/girl. There were a few scenes with black women and also a few with very dark black men with white women. The black men were nicely built down there and the women appreciated that.
If I had to sum up the sex parts, it was a better than ok site with a few quite hot videos. The quality was good at High Definition as the best on offer and this comes with a huge network. |
|
10-19-21 12:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
141
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my first times trying Kink out. This is one of the better sites for my taste in porn.
High-powered machines with dildos on them being used on women in various ways.
The scenes are long, I would even say that is part of the “pain”. Most are 40-60 minutes.
The remastered versions of their older videos have 1080p downloads.
Lots of squirting, writhing orgasms, messy orgasms, this is a site that I believe we can be assured is showing real orgasms.
All scenes are downloadable, but the highest download option on most is 720p |
| Cons: |
No longer updates, but it is all new to me.
The noise of the machines, the women screaming, moaning, sadly, to me takes away some of the eroticism.
Would be hard to justify as a purchase by itself. The scenes, even though I like them, are very similar. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Kink two other times in the past, but did not look into all the sites and even once, joined Kink Men, without realizing it gave me full access to the whole network. Nearly everything on the network is harder than I like or prefer, but I like to try different things.
There’s no story or plot or any secret about these scenes. A woman is going to lay down on a table, possibly strapped (bondage) to the table or against a wall, there are multiple variations as to how they position the women. Some have ball gags in their mouth which I believe helps with the noise level. I feel bad for saying that, but some of the scenes are unwatchable based on all the noise mixed with the women’s screams.
The last update was on August 20, 2020 and it was a remastered Sasha Grey scene. I have noticed most of the sites on Kink have a lot of recent remasters. The only difference I see in those is they have a 1080p download option. With the length of these videos they are large files even in 720p.
I think what I liked most about it and it’s why my score is positive is that the models are often mainstream porn models. This seems like a niche made for amateurs, but the mainstream models, many of which are sexy, show a side of these models that you don’t see in their mainstream scenes. I’m not sure if that is a good thing -- for the porn industry as a whole, there are some known “innocent and sweet” models on here showing they are wild and experienced, but that’s what happens when a woman watches too much porn. I start noticing things that are not that important to the point of the scene.
I believe the other strong point is you’re seeing real orgasms on this site. There’s not a way to fake an 8 inch dildo hammering inside the woman for 40 minutes. There is squirting, puddling, sticky messes and the women do talk about the experience. They all seem very pleased and satisfied!
The rest of the site is basic, but that’s not a detraction. The scenes are laid out 20 to a page, the download options on the majority of scenes are 720p, 540p, 360p, 288p and 270p. There are pictures, but it seems like to me this is the one site where pictures are not useful. There’s too much movement.
I would recommend it to anyone like me who is interested in something different and tries Kink out. I believe this is the least hardcore or possibly “offensive” of their sites. They do excellent work with the cameras and in making the models at least seem comfortable. |
|
06-09-21 05:02am
Replies (1)
|
Review
142
|
MetArtX
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It is similar to Met Art except with more explicit videos and less of everything else.
308 models and 307.5 of them are 8 or higher on a 10 scale. Very pretty women.
They have 1,025 videos and 838 photo sets.
They update daily with either a video or photo set.
Everything is downloadable and without limits as far as I can tell.
Could possibly subscribe to the theory of less is more when compared to regular Met Art. |
| Cons: |
Other reviewers have mentioned this con on various sites on the Met Art Network, those Staff Selection scenes are kind of annoying. There also are ads on the right margin of your screen.
If Met Art’s explicitness is a 3-4 on a 10 scale, Met Art X’s explicitness is a 6-7, I would like to see them up it a little more in the 8-10 range since this is still solo porn and not hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
There are alternating feelings with this site. I also joined Met Art’s regular site. I was completely and utterly overwhelmed by Met Art’s regular site. It would take me a year just to see all their models. Met Art X has a much more manageable 308 models to sort through and it’s more explicit -- just not as explicit as it probably should be.
I was surprised by the lower amount of photo sets than videos since Met Art is known best for photos. The feeling I get from this site is that it's what would happen if Met Art regular let their shoots run an extra 15-20 minutes. You still get the tease, you still get the strip (most scenes) and instead of stopping at showing off their pink, you get to watch them use it on Met Art X.
The site is relatively large and the quality is very high. The photo sets and videos combine for nearly 2,000 potential downloads and I have not read or seen anything about limits on the downloads. They are updating daily which is a rarity these days and they seem to have updates prepared for the future. You can check to see what the next updates are going to be. Which is good for the consumer and for the site too. It could help you decide to keep the membership for another month or decide to cancel.
My biggest con and complaint is the masturbation is on the more gentle side. As a member of 5 of Met Art’s sites right now it almost seems like I’m going through a progression with each site. With me, watching young women masturbate can be very arousing or very boring. There doesn’t seem to be a middle ground. Some of these scenes go into very arousing and the rest are very boring. When I reviewed Nubiles (my once favorite site), I talked about how the most realistic masturbation can be the least interesting to watch. I don’t get that feeling as much on Met Art X, but it is there. What does most realistic masturbation mean? That the model is trying to get off as fast as possible. If she does it in a sexy way that’s good, if she doesn’t, she doesn’t care since she still got off and got paid doing it. The first solo models I remember watching around 2008-2010 did that too, but there were some of those who seemed to be as much into being sexy, being seductive and alluring the viewer into watching her masturbate. Which does give the viewer the feeling they want you to join them. It seems to be the magic ticket with solo porn.
That is a personal complaint and doesn’t really reflect negative feelings towards the site. The site for my money more than delivers on giving you the content you paid for. There are 4K, 1080p, 720p, and smaller download resolutions on the videos. The photo sets can be downloaded in 3 different sizes and are of the same quality you would expect from a Met Art site. I just wish the content was a little harder even as solo content. From the content I have looked through there are no other genres explored than solo. If there’s a lesbian scene in there I must have missed it. Doing a search on the site for “lesbian” brings up 4 scenes, but all 4 are solo. Maybe they are saying the model is a lesbian in real life? There is no male/female.
It’s still a good site as long as you know what you are getting into. In my limited experience with porn it is not that common for me to see a site that is strictly solo. The women, the technical quality and ease of use of the site all help the site greatly. The tags are helpful, but I do think they could find another way to list those. There is no menu for tags. You just see the tags once inside a scene and have to hope one of the tags is one you’re looking for. The search box does let you search, but there is that inaccuracy with the lesbian search. These are ticky-tacky problems to what is to me a better way to introduce yourself to the world of Met Art since it’s not overwhelming. |
|
04-06-21 02:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
143
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of naked men being groped, sucked and fucked by "stranger" women.
As a past member, it is nice to see their additions of multiple camera angles to see different views of the action and different models.
Have changed nearly all scenes to a new style, combining what used to be 2-3 part scenes into 1 and scenes over the last year have 4 different camera angles.
That random drunk woman you know isn't a porn star that grabs two of the guys and sticks their dicks in her mouth.
Most of the guys are attractive.
The amateurs in the crowd -- in most cases -- look like real amateurs. |
| Cons: |
The editing needs to be improved. Having to watch the scene from 4 different cameras gives it a "genuine" feel, but they no problem getting every cumshot into the scene.
The porn girls in the scenes are either too obvious by their looks or they have yellow bands on their arms letting the guys know which are the women to do the most with.
In a few words -- the scenes are too hectic.
Same venues. |
| Bottom Line: |
If I had reviewed this site 10 years ago it would have been a mid-90s. It was different and seemed to be aimed at women viewers. The scenes often lasted too long, but they were enjoyable. I think the new format with 4 camera views is good if there are parts you really want to see. If the scene is not a good one, the 4 camera view makes it 4 times worse.
I don't know if the DVD site Videoez had anything to do with the change in the way the scenes are now laid out, but at one time, you could download a lot of these scenes from Videoez in "Best of" compilations. That is how they have done the older scenes on here. They have taken the best of their previous 90 minute scenes and lowered them to 30 minutes.
They have photos and screencaps which I don't remember them having in the past. The photos show a lot of what you don't see in the videos.
The scenes have removed most of the pre-action stripping and dancing by the males -- which is a plus. I still have some of the scenes from 7 years ago and the names are much different. Instead of the name just being the date and city of the scene, they are now titled like "Party Hardcore Gone Crazy Vol. 17".
Every video I have downloaded has a 1080p option, 720p and 480p option.
The hectic parts are not as bad as they used to be, but they are still using the same venues. The scenes play out the same and can be somewhat repetitive.
I think the niche is intriguing and could be better with some work on the amount of men and amount of "audience". A hundred women screaming and cheering on one model while music is blasting is distracting and frustrating.
It's hard to say much about the amount of content. It looks like it has dropped, but where they have combined scenes, the drop in quantity is most likely because of the combining.
The more I have watched these scenes I am starting to think these would be just as good for men -- maybe better -- than for women. I have been to three bachelorette parties, but never experienced anything like this. Maybe the fantasy is for a male viewer to think this is what goes on at the bachelorette parties their wife goes to?
I'm stuck in the middle on this one. I want it to be one of my favorite sites, but I like the videos I have from the past as much or more than these.
It's a good site by itself that is helped a lot by being in the Tainster network. My score would be a little lower if not for the pictures as they add a lot to the scenes. Good site in a little represented niche. |
|
09-10-19 01:14am
Replies (0)
|
Review
144
|
Leg Sex
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of my first attractions to porn.
Pretty and cute models
Leg and foot fetishists will be happy
Unlimited downloads and while not 4K, the videos do have 1080p and 720p download options.
Bonus site called Naughty Foot Jobs is a decent site (for a bonus).
Also appeals to heels and hose fetishists. |
| Cons: |
It’s not a big site considering the niche is one of the oldest in internet porn.
Photo-dominated site that is based on a magazine. Not really a con for me, but could be a deal breaker for some. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I heard of Leg Sex was the movie of the same name, produced by Viv Thomas. I have trouble believing anyone, any producer, can do more with leg sex than Viv Thomas has. I find the Leg Sex name as a niche to be a little frustrating. I always look at Leg Sex porn as softcore. A lot of the focus is on the pretty legs, hose, heels, panties and knowing where the legs lead to.
Even as a straight or curious bisexual female, I know a site like Leg Sex will sink or swim based on the looks of its models. That’s good news, the models are very pretty and while repetitive, mostly look similar to the other models on the site. There’s consistency from scene to scene.
The pictures dominate the site and it’’s not a surprise for me. Leg sex includes a lot of teasing. Teasing doesn’t translate well into videos. Though photo-domiated there are still videos. The main reason is Leg Sex, the site, is based off the magazine Leg Sex.
The pictures are crystal clear and the videos, while not 4K, are available in downloadable high definition files. I’m not for sure that Leg Sex solo is even a good idea,
The navigation is a little different than I’m used to. I’m thinking that’s because most of this content is made for a magazine not a website.
The site is a nice change of pace and if you’re a leg sex fann, it’’s worth joining just to get access to their back catalog,
I do believe the site could push itself ahead with bonus videos from other sites representing other niches.
I signed up using Rocket Pay, which still has the cookie that remembers you and wants to upsell a membership.
I meant to mention in the cons that there’s not a lot of physical sex. The site and content reminds me of what it is – a non-hardcore porn magazine. It does narrow the audience for this content.
The site could be a lot better, but it does only appeal to those who are really into softcore, legs and tease.
I do believe it's limited by the connection to the magazine. We are nearing the days of magazines and even photos being replaced by their digital counterparts. |
|
03-07-23 07:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
145
|
Pink Label
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
An interesting site that works as a finder for unique porn scenes.
There are educational and instructional videos too.
Most scenes have subtitles or captions.
Epoch is the biller.
Some of the scenes remind me of early 2000s Vivid scenes which are my favorites. |
| Cons: |
A lot of shorter scenes under 10 minutes.
No dates on the scenes. I don’t know if it’s updating.
No downloads |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is run by the same company as Crash Pad Series that I reviewed. This is a video site that’s not unlike Videobox or sites like that. What is different though, this is more like they found the unique scenes and that’s what they have. It’s not going to be for everyone. I thought some of the scenes were cast poorly. I don’t think this site does the casting. I believe these videos are by other studios. I could be wrong. The scenes are different to say the least. There is one with an overweight transsexual with an overweight gay man. It’s like softcore. I’m sure my mind has been corrupted by all the porn I’ve watched, but I just don’t see that pairing fitting in a softcore scene. There is the uniqueness of that. If a person is into an overweight transsexual and overweight gay man in softcore, here it is. I think that would be really hard to find.
I didn’t see a reason to put this in the cons. I don’t think they film there themselves. A lot of the scenes I liked had strange camerawork. I’m not known for loving hardcore porn, but the cumshot is my favorite part. The camera scans away or to the left. It’s almost like it’s trying to be too artistic. The cumshot is the one part I would want to fully see.
They do have some really good lesbian scenes and masturbation scenes. I like that they don’t stick with the traditional models. You will see a big variety of sizes, looks, tattoos, piercings and I do prefer that.
They also have men masturbating which is my favorite porn niche. It’s too bad I can’t download those to put in my collection. They list those as Gentlemen Handling. You also get a variety in those with some being transsexuals. I have joined sites just for Gentlemen Handling.
I believe what they do is go out and get independent porn producers’ scenes. That’s going to always be hit or miss. And what could be hit for me may be miss for someone else and vice-versa. There are some group scenes, even have some pegging which I sometimes like, but other times not so much. It’s not mostly amateurs like their other site. I recognize a lot of these performers. I know I saw Kali Sudhra and Amirah Adara. Most of the scenes I watched have the same positive the Crash Pad site had. The action is very believable and sincere. That’s going to enter into your preferences. I don’t know how much some people want to see sincere kissing in porn. I like it, but I’m a woman.
Those instructional and educational videos are very interesting to me. They even have a how to squirt video. I always wondered why more sites didn’t try videos like that. I don’t know about you all, but everything I learned about sex was from porn! Why not give us some instructional videos and manuals?
That no downloads part is going to be a sticking point for me. There are a lot of these scenes that I would like to have. That’s a compliment that I would like to download them, but it doesn’t change that. I haven’t been on that many sites over the years. I never really understood the thinking behind no downloads. It’s one of the first sites I’ve been on that has that rule. It just seems like the style of porn they have goes against conventional thinking so why shouldn’t the business practice? I won’t take a lot off for the no downloads, but will take 5 points off for that. It’s a good, unique video site that only needs to fix that no downloads part. Everything else is workable with the site. |
|
06-08-22 03:18am
Replies (0)
|
Review
146
|
Next Door Buddies
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site with a sports, athletic, jocks theme.
Updates 3 times per month and has 816 scenes on it.
Videos can be downloaded as can photo zips.
Handsome, athletic guys, but may be more directed at gay men than women.
Categories, search by model, are the main navigation features. |
| Cons: |
Only 17 scenes are listed as solo and I’m not for sure there are even that many. The solo ones show multiple guys.
Scenes are repetitive. |
| Bottom Line: |
I prefer solo scenes, but these scenes have at least some parts I like. There are naked, masculine men with erect penises. Why is it men don’t have to go through this? Someone really needs to make porn sites aimed at women. The site gives me the feeling of quantity over quality. Please understand that a gay man might see this differently than a straight woman. Some of these scenes are borderline romantic. There’s hugging, cuddling, kissing, and as much as I support those actions, it’s not why I join a gay porn site. The good news is these guys are mostly young, fit and athletic. They get impressive erections, and this is how I always feel about gay porn. I like most everything up until the sex. The sex on here looks like a couple in love. I can’t fantasize about being between two gay men that are in love with each other. I guess I could, but they wouldn’t be too happy about it!
The site is large and it’s just my thinking that is why the scenes are repetitive. There are 816 scenes, each has videos and photo zips. The download options on the videos are 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p and 4K on the scenes from the last few years. The photos are generic feeling. There are 20-40 pictures in each set. The first 5-6 are pictures of the guys in clothes. Then 5-6 taking their clothes off. The rest are of the sex.
The categories could be confusing for someone thinking there are a lot of scenes a woman might like. They show 492 scenes with the masturbation tag. Only 329 with rimming. I really don’t know if these categories are very accurate. There are only 610 scenes listed as gay porn, but the site has 816 scenes. What are the other 206 scenes if not gay porn? A gay male friend told me the easiest way to tell if the scenes are just marketed at gay men and not women is to look at the categories on body types. There are 80 “hairy” and only 15 listed as “beefy”. It seems hairy, beefy guys are more for the women to look at. I feel really dumb explaining that as a woman. It does seem like those categories might hold the secret to figuring out the type of “gay” porn I can expect from a site. The two that didn’t help at all are 187 scenes with “big muscles” tag and 164 with “slim” tag. My best description of the males on this site is “pretty boys”. All in all it’s not bad and it has enough scenes you’re sure to find something you like. |
|
12-08-21 02:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
147
|
Brasil Bimbos
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Included in Adult Prime network
Updates once a week
Many dark and exotic looking full bodied Latinas.
Nice tags for easy searching
Four streaming and download options that include 4k |
| Cons: |
Small site with only 25 videos. Every download uses the same file name.
No scene description or subtitles. The videos are in Portuguese.
There are no photos
Condoms, either a pro or a con depending on how you look at it |
| Bottom Line: |
I have never watched porn made in any country in Latin America, so I was not sure what to expect. I thought porn was about seeing beautiful bodies going at it, so how different could it be? The first thing that I noticed was that there were no scene descriptions or any kind of subtitles. They spoke Portuguese and the models fit stereotypes that are sometimes comparable to those in American porn. The men were generally very muscular, very tattooed and most had their hair cut in ways you don’t see in porn made here. Jhoony Gab has ten scenes and has blue hair. Higor Silva has four scenes and in some has blue hair. Oscar Luz is in six scenes, so I guess these guys are pros not amateurs. These three guys are in 20 scenes out of the 25 on the site and one of those is a lesbian four way.
Most of the women have a mixed race, mostly black look and their bodies can only be called voluptuous and hourglass. Not at all thin, they have larger sized breasts and hips. Most have tan lines from wearing bikinis. Brazil is well known for their beaches and if I went there, I would hope to see women like these.
They are what you might expect from Brazilians who have a reputation for having big butts, however one model is an exception. Indians have a diaspora that includes a lot of places, but I never expected to see one on a Brazilian porn site. Indian women are known for being large breasted, but Sumaya Ganesha is not. She does not have a big butt either. She was named after the Hindu God Ganesha, you know the one with the head of an elephant. He is thought to bring good luck, but we are the lucky ones to see her in her two videos. She has a tattoo of Ganesha on her upper right arm.
In a scene labeled as Autoridade Maxima, in English Full Authority, her guy has sex with Sumaya using a condom. I see no problem with that, as I am not sure if they have the rigorous testing for porn performers that we have in the United States. When he is ready, the condom comes off and he cums in her mouth. Is that safe for her? Although the scene has no subtitles or explanation, he has a badge and handcuffs. She handcuffs him to the bed frame and he does oral sex on her until she cums. Her orgasm seems very genuine too. I have never seen a man in porn go down on a woman except as foreplay. Considering that In most American heterosexual porn the woman’s need are generally ignored, the fact that he does that AFTER he cums is a refreshing surprise.
I thought the prettiest model was Lunna Real, who has a young vibrant look in her videos and wears braces. She has two scenes and in one she just devours his cock and makes him cum inside her mouth. She loved it, it looked unscripted and spontaneous that she made him cum in her mouth. The other was a lesbian four way pussy licking orgy where she clearly was the star of the scene. She should be signed up by a major US or European porn producer and I could see her becoming a big star. Such enthusiasm needs to be rewarded.
In most cases the men are darker than the women. However, I am not sure if that is planned. The sets are generally rooms in a modern house, but not the rich looking mansions you often see in US porn. It is hard to say what the basic premise is in each scene as you don’t know what they are saying. Clearly this is not your dull standard two people in a hotel room and they just go at it. A typical scene starts with her looking at her phone sitting on a deck or she is taking a bath. He walks in and they talk for a few seconds and then they are like animals in heat. The cum shots generally were external and In nearly every scene the woman is boringly passive. In a few scenes he cums inside, or he jerks himself off onto her. I want to see the woman making him cum and enjoying it.
The site has tags that work well and the videos can be streamed as well as downloaded in four options including 4K. Downloads were fast enough and are added once a week. One thing missing is photo sets. I don’t care about that, but if you do, there is a way. If you use VLC player you can create screenshots. If you want to create custom clips of just certain parts, the site has this as a feature.
One video had a few seconds of the gorgeous coastline. A suggestion for future scenes is that if they showed more of that beautiful Brazilian scenery, it would make the scenes better. How about some scenes open with her on the beach in a bikini, then she goes inside and finds a man there? Maybe one masturbating?
I think the site has potential, but only time will tell. With only 25 videos it needs to grow. I think as part of a large network it is worth checking out. |
|
11-07-21 09:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
148
|
4K CFNM
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All the videos are available in 4K as well as High Definition
Comes with Adult Prime Network of over 75 studios
The network has no download limits
Nice variety of CFNM scenarios
The downloads were fast
The younger models, both male and female, were very attractive |
| Cons: |
Only 34 videos are available
You never know when updates will be posted |
| Bottom Line: |
I like Clothed Female with Naked Male as a porn theme as the men are there as the object of desire for women. I will check out any site like this, but unfortunately there just aren’t all that many.
The level of variety you do find here is surprisingly refreshing as well as diverse. I found older men with younger women, older women with younger men, outdoor as well as indoor scenes, two on one, even one with five women and one guy, mild bdsm, although one that I found impossible to watch was Ball Busting with Gunther, BBW women, and even a few where the guy was so old and ugly that it stretched my ability to believe it could be true. I can’t explain one in particular that got to me and was my favorite. I guess it was the contrast of two gorgeous young ladies being so enthusiastic with a guy like that.
The sex was for the most part the women blowing the guys, which is commonly what you see a lot of in CFNM. In a few scenes a second or third woman walks in and accidentally sees the action. Many of these scenes had a woman who was watching and masturbating to the action, who then later got in on it. I could see that happening in real life and would like more of that in all porn today, not just CFNM. It adds a touch of believability and is something that I think most women would find an improvement.
The tags for searching does give results over the whole network, not just this site. If you do a search under CFNM , you get some that are not here, giving a total of 58. If you want to search for more videos of the same female star you can, but the guys are not named. The downloads were fast and there were three options, one of course was 4K and another High Definition. The site did not have download limits as you might guess for only so few videos, but the network did not have any limits either.
The site Is rather small and it is hard to tell where its future is. It has been updated nine times so far this year, six in 2020, and 19 in 2019. I don’t have any serious negatives except that the site has only 34 videos. As much as this site was enjoyable, it was just not big enough by itself. The network though is huge with over 75 studios and there are several other older/younger sites if those appeal to you. |
|
10-19-21 12:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
149
|
Erotica X
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Highly polished, glam with a story, porn.
Includes access to 3 other sites, Dark X, Hard X and Lesbian X.
Very high quality and production quality, reminds me a little of the Met-Art sites.
Cliched stories are better than no stories.
Videos are downloadable in 9 different resolutions, starting with 160p and going up to 4K. Maybe I will ask Santa for a 4K monitor this year? The oldest scenes have up to 1080p.
Updates once a week and has 319 scenes on it. |
| Cons: |
It would seem like pictures would be important to a site like this, but the photo sets are limited in number of photos but they do have downloads (corrected error, missed the button).
I have noticed with these softer "hardcore" sites, sometimes the action just falls very flat. |
| Bottom Line: |
I think I'm still earning my porn rookie badge. I joined this site thinking it was a standalone site. To my surprise, those other 3 sites come with it and as a whole, it's a very good deal.
The content here is like reading an erotica book that your neighbor's wife authored. That's not really a bad thing, maybe she's the next Anais Nin? The stories were a selling point for me, but I probably expected too much.
As an example from the newer scenes. Featuring the gorgeous Vina Sky, her boyfriend broke up with her via text message. She calls her best male friend for a shoulder to cry on and realizes she's been in love with the best friend the whole time. Doesn't that contradict the heartbreak she has? She ended up with the guy she's really in love with.
So, maybe your neighbor's wife isn't the next Anais Nin, after all. It's still better than no story. The scenes are very serious feeling. There's not a lot of feeling of raw emotions or passion. It's not bad, but it just seems a little stale like a two day old doughnut.
There's very little variation in the scenes. Most are male/female, there are some solo and lesbian scenes, but in my opinion, not enough of either of those. I think with this narrow of a niche there should be a near equal balance in solo (fantasizing), lesbian (fantasizing and real), male/female (real). It would add more of a connected feel to the scenes.
The quality of the videos are excellent, but I'm not going to compliment the settings too much. It looks like all these couples and people rented the same hotel room. They must have blew the budget on those stories.
I streamed most of these scenes which isn't the best sign. A few are worth downloading, but most of them started feeling repetitive.
I don't understand why they don't have more pictures. I'm not a picture collector or downloader, but I can usually look at the pictures and combine them with what I see in the video to make more of a connection to the scene.
It's good, what I would call safe porn. It's not going to make you think you're witnessing a revolution in porn, but it's good enough to get off to, a time or two. I do think with the 3 other sites combined as a 4 site network it's a very good deal. I'm going to review the opposite site from their network just to show a completely different experience. |
|
11-04-19 09:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
150
|
Social Glamour
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Glamour site that focuses on a small amount of models.
Current Halloween promo for $14.99
Gorgeous models and the feeling they are going for a little more than typical glamour models including a few heavier models that are just as pretty.
I'm not for sure if all these models are big stars or not, but a couple of PU members told me the one on here, Gemma Massey, was a once huge tease star.
Huge photo sets with 250+ photos being normal, can be downloaded and the resolution on the photos are massive 6700x4400.
Easy site to use with a small amount of models, but large amount of overall content. |
| Cons: |
Doesn't look like it's updating anymore. The newest update I've found was March 2019.
Not near as much nudity as I expected.
Videos aren't named videos, they are named "tease" and they are short, less than 5 minutes with annoying techno music in the background.
40GB Daily Download Limit, hard to believe you would hit it. |
| Bottom Line: |
I guess there's a part of me that enjoys looking at beautiful women posing, in pretty clothes, and not just having sex. This site is good for that.
We also could be looking at the site's biggest weakness. This site is really pushing the limits of "is it cable television or porn?"
It's interesting how the site is made. They have only 26 models, but they have 3,488 photo sets and over 4,000 tease videos of those 26 models. I can't say I have ever seen a porn site like this one. I can't even for sure say this is a porn site.
I watched 22GB of videos one day and didn't see anything more than full nudity with no masturbation. It is very artsy feeling. It is difficult to grade it just because the content is so high quality and there's so much of it, but for me, not exactly a porn connoisseur, it leaves me feeling like they left out the porn.
I'll list a few of the most popular models just in case anyone is a collector or fan...
Charley S, Gemma Massey, Lexi Lowe, Mica Martinez, Holly Gibbons and Anastasia Harris.
All of these models look like what I would describe as high-level or top-tier models, but I will also add none of these models look young. They seem to fit more into the mid 20s to mid 30s age range.
The picture sets are the stars of the site with resolutions I've never seen 6700x4300, picture sets that are 700MB in size. The level of tease in them is questionably high. Questionably because it's all most of the photo sets have. They have one photo set of Anastasia Harris that has 300 photos in it. She starts out in a one piece bathing suit. By picture 300 she still has the bottoms of the bathing suit on. That's a lot of pictures to only progress from bathing suit to topless.
I'm sure there is a market for this type of content, I'm just not sure I'm part of it.
The videos are even more frustrating. I once watched some videos on Met-Art and the teen to early 20 models, danced around, usually nude, but the shadows and camera angles stopped much from showing. These videos are of what look to be and are listed as older women that are dancing around, not even nude for 4-6 minutes.
A couple of the more experience PU members told me about Gemma Massey. She is one of the ones that gets fully nude in her videos, but she just dry humps a bed and rolls around.
I will also mention the daily download limit. It shows at the top of your screen with a bar to keeps track of your daily download activity. It counts videos you stream too. I downloaded a few and they are 1080p.
I think if a person was a huge fan or collector of any of the models on this site this would be a treasure trove for them as most of the models have 150-200 photo sets and as many videos, but it still doesn't feel like porn to me.
It also hasn't updated in 7 months.
There are some really pretty models here with outstanding photo sets, but most just leave me wanting to see more, even the sets with 300 pictures. It's a good site, but needs more oomph to it. |
|
10-28-19 11:02pm
Replies (0)
|
|
