I WOULD SENT AN EMAIL TO SelenaMetArt, SHE IS THE WEB MISTRESS.
SHE OFTEN FOLLOWS THE REVIEWS AND COMMENTS ON METART AT PU.
SHE HAS ALWAYS BEEN HELPFUL AND CONSIDERATE IN THE PAST.
I'VE GOTTEN SEVERAL OFFERS FROM HER FOR EXTENDED DAYS ON MY METART SITES MEMBERSHIPS, BUT I NEVER TOOK HER UP ON THEM.
I WOULD BE VERY SUPRISED IF SHE DIDN'T AUTOMATICALLY OFFER TO CANCEL THE CHARGES FOR THE SEXART CROSS-SALE. METART USED TO BE THE GOLD STANDARD OF CUSTOMER SERVICE, AND ALSO FOR EXCELLENT SITE SUPPORT.
THEY'VE HAD SOME TECHNICAL ISSUES LATELY.
BUT IT WOULD BE A BLACK MARK IF THEY CHARGED YOU ON A CROSS-SALE THAT YOU DIDN'T SEE.
THEY USED TO BE ABOVE THAT.
I didn't even know Watch 4 Beauty was going to be part of their network.
It seems that are adding new sites at a rapid pace. Some of the sites are older, established sites, other sites are apparently completely new.
PU has a link to join Watch $ Beauty for $14.95/month.
Like you, I wish Met Art had kept the discount link to join other sites in the network for $10/month.
Maybe, just hoping, if one of the Met Art web masters looks at the PU comments, they might bring it back. Or not.
Those body modifications can often resolve controversies over model identities too. Sometimes a model changes her hair colour and style, gains or loses weight and wears very different makeup. Since models appear under many different names, some distinctive tattoo, piercing or scar can sometimes be the only way to be certain she is the same person. It is sad when one can distinguish by means of pre- or post-boob-job.
Your described mix of pre- and post-piercing sets is an interesting example of where the model can be identified without the distinctive feature but where the change in feature dates the sets.
Release or re-release date has no bearing on actually how old the material is. As CP says, it depends on when, where & how much material was shot & the websites' publication policy & schedule.
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
I said the same thing, basically, that I liked the old home page better, because it was easier for me to use, and more useful, because I really liked the simplicity of a large number of the most recent updates with a thumbnail that, with simple click, brought up a full-page version of the cover sheet.
But the new home page design is a better advertisement for newbies and casual browsers, in that it shows more of what the site offers.
I've said it before, but Met-art is my favorite porn site. They have an incredible number of attractive models, an incredible amount of good-to-great looking photosets, and the site is, in spite of massive content, easy to use and easy to navigate. They also have an update rate of photosets and new models that is incredible.
If they wanted to improve the site, I think they should stop making/posting new videos, and spend the money on even more photosets. Because I can't remember if I ever saw more than a tiny number of videos I liked at this site. All the time and effort and money put into videos that I think are boring.
But the number of photosets they post, on a daily basis, blows away any other photo site I've ever joined.
Yeah I saw that deal with Nubiles the other day in my inbox, very tempting indeed. Both sites are huge and have so many cuties, it would be interesting to see who's new.
My only thing is I'm not a huge photo lover anymore, got loads of Met stuff photos that I just never go back to as theres always some video I end up watching instead. Still its good to hear they are improving the vids at Met.
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Perhaps I need to clear my browser cache. But what I am seeing is still the mis-sorted/mis-dated thumbnail page. The page itself looks fine, as long as you don't care when the photosets were actually posted. But I usually like to check the daily updates, to see if there are any photosets I might be interested in.
And the page I am looking at has the wrong dates listed for the most recent photosets.
For example:
07.21.2010 MILENA D "GOODNIGHT"
07.21.2010 LORENA B "GRACIOUS"
are the dates listed for the two photosets above, which were supposedly posted today, July 21, 2010.
But those photosets were actually posted:
July 15, 2010 MILENA D "GOODNIGHT"
July 04, 2010 LORENA B "GRACIOUS"
Those are just a few of the photosets that are being posted with the wrong date.
If you use the Internet, you can find the actual date each photoset
was originally posted.
But it's not a major problem. I believe Met-art will fix it sometime soon.
But if your computer shows the correct dates for the two photosets I listed, then the problem is with my computer, which is still showing incorrect dates for many of the recent photosets.
If you are seeing the correct dates for the two photosets I listed, I would appreciate your stating this.
Or if you are seeing the incorrect dates for the two photosets I listed, I would appreciate your stating this.
Because I am interested to know if I am seeing the current update page, or if I am seeing an older update page, and need to clear my browser cache, or try some other fix.
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
For a while I was getting into Japanese flix, and I even bought the following DVDs:
Ichi the Killer (Takashi Miike)
Audition (Takashi Miike)
Gozu (Takashi Miike)
Shark Skin Man and Peach Hip Girl (Katsuhito Ishii)
ZATOICHI: THE BLIND SWORDSMAN (Takeshi Kitano )
And a bunch of others. Some of these are very bloody. Actually, the ones I listed are extremely violent and bloody.
But I haven't seen any Japanese flix for a while. I guess I was hoping Met-art would provide the blood and guts stimulus I needed. :)
> If you enjoy softer nude stuff well-presented with gorgeous babes - updated daily, this sites's pretty awesome.
Do you mind if I amend it a bit? "If you enjoy softer nude stuff well-presented with gorgeous babes WITH BORED "I'M THE QUEEN AND YOU'RE DIRT" EXPRESSION CLEARLY WRITTEN ON THEIR FACES" - updated daily, this sites's pretty awesome." would be MUCH better description IMHO :-).
I hear you, Nubiles is on my short list to replace a site that I eventually tire of.
Interesting side note that shows you are definitely on target...Nubiles has a check box on their signup page for...yup...MetArt. (Unless you uncheck it you get a $2.99 trial followed by a full membership at $29.99.
> I don't think it's suspicious when someone starts their posting career
> at PU giving the highest ratings ever - probably because that's what I
> did.
Interesting, maybe I'm suspicious because I didn't it? :-) But seriously, starting with 98 or so review is a "business card" of the typical "shill" (we've seen many of them here, and there is no doubt about it); while I agree it is not conclusive evidence, it is still suspicious.
> Met Art deserves high praise...
If only they would make their models look a bit more alive than current "dead fish" looks... But unfortunately there is no holy grail in porn, not even in softcore :-(.
The Panther kind of speak my meaning here: As a fan a fine solo-videos Met Art does NOT do it for me - they are simply too, yes well spoken PP:
BORING.
Been a member many times, but never saved any videos - only photosets.
Solo-videos: Go for Nubiles, Teendreams, 1byday and quite a few others.
True they are boring if you are wanting something hardcore in that case I agree with you. I think that is the main thing if you want a bottle of beer then dont order a class of wine.Most people think that all sites have hardcore or someting and that is not always the case like with any true erotic art site I guess there is a fine line when it comes to erotic vids that no site really satisfies as it does seem like MET-ART,FEMJOY, ect do try to improve their vids maybe they should look into explaining to any cx's what excatly it is they want to see ie is more hardcore or is it a more convincing errotic style that they are wanting. I think it is possiable though that MET-ART wont show anything like masturbation or the like as I know that some of there models do hardcore stuff on other sites,I guess if you are wanting hardcore action but like MET-ART the best bet I can think of is Nubiles.net. That is what I like about review sites like this it gives people a chance to see what several people think of a web site that way someone can say well I think more like this person so maybe I will/wont like this site. Better than just going in blind that is for sure.
Thanks PP
- for a very..........well, I just can't find the right english word for it - but something like: a constructive and helpfull reply......
Great to have folks like you as a fellow PU.
"I honestly can't think of another site that gives their members more high quality material on a regular basis."
I really agree! It's my top favorite site for that reason. Some days, I never get anything, but that happens with every site. It's kinda weird that I've never reviewed it.
Denner's review is great. He mentions pic sizes in detail. Actually, there are sometimes sets that land in the 2500-3000px range for the largest size, but they're still "nicely proportioned."
About the vids, one thing I'd like mention, as I've recently gone on a hunt there, is that some of them are of photoshoots, so you don't get a sense of interaction with the model much at all (she's working with the photographer) and the camera is flashing. Two recent ones of Nikky Case are like that.
I did find vids from the following that didn't show camera flashing and were more properly "real" videos: Tim Fox (esp of Evelyn Lory!), Gubin, Majoly, and Volkov. Can't say it's going to be true every time with them, though.
And sometimes the vids are just not very professionally done. Saw one of Elle B, who's really a doll babe in photos, lying on the grass and turning to quickly pick bits of soil off herself and generally looking awkward and kind of annoyed. Seemed a bit "at two with nature" in that one.
Probably my favorite photographer on there is Tim Fox. Some of his sets of Evelyn Lory are so exciting that I just lose my mind!
I've had similiar experiences with them not responding to some of my emails, but I've had a few responses. Most of my emails were complaints about such things as PosterDude described in his review (photos that are too grainy, too dark, or overly processed), so I felt at least I was having my say. Whether they pay attention or not is hard to tell, but change usually takes time and persistence.
They really are a LOT better than they used to be, though. They used to segment the photosets (much smaller in image size) and add segments over SEVERAL MONTHS. That was awful!
REPLY TO
#4
from exotics4me:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Pink Panther, This is why I need more than 1500 characters! Though, I don't find the models that different in general. Maybe it is because of similar poses or hairstyles? I do like the site as one to look at, my wife loves it, she also loves Abby Winters, a site I really can't stand at all.
Skinny women are a no-no for me. Coming from California, I've been around the naturally curvy or surgically enhanced curvy women. The waif-skinny ones are to the point that they turn whatever turn on I have, off. I would prefer a meatier model that some call "fat" like the girls on Ox Pass.
But I do agree, their photos are beautiful to look at. Similar though, if someone parks a new Lamborghini in front of me, I'm going to enjoy looking at it for a little while, but I'm going to get bored and want to drive it eventually! I have trouble with the imagination part if I have never seen what I am imagining. Similar to Next Door Nikki and all those non-nude models, I could never get into those because they never show what I am imagining. Most of all, even my wife thinks the videos are bad! Thanks for the comment
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
