Schumer's reaction to limitations of free speech, whether they are applied to porn or to radio, are echoed by many, many others in Congress including Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein and Henry Waxman, all from my state of California. There has been no, repeat, NO disavowals by anyone on the Left of the intentions to establish limitations on free speech and the comment by UpChuck Schumer was not a careless or casual remark. It was totally consistent with all other public statements made by US Liberals.
With the Liberals in power, the UK has already made major moves that are preludes to what we'll be seeing now that we have a Liberal administration and a very Liberal Congress.
Editing... That'z anotha subject! U see Pussy getting thrusted and the guy is reaching inevitability... Next thing U know... The cum is already on the face!!! Okay, so when did the pussy started feeling so good that it made him have to pull out?!!
Yo Drool Man, Wutz up! Howz it goin'? Life iz quite good 4 now. :D
I just wanted 2 comment on Da stabbing thing. Have U ever had some pussy so good that U couldn't stay in it too long? :D Well Pussy like that, if your intentions are to make that Pussy orgasm, you are gonna stab it... Cuz repeated thrusting of this good Pussy will fucking set off your fireworks!! :D
> That done, I'd view her stuff right before going to her place,
> thinking, "Wow, I'M going to bone this babe! For REAL!"
I think I'd react the same way.
Good points, Drooler. In the USA showing a tit (E.G. Janet Jackson) is far more outragious than sawing up living human beings (AKA "Saw" 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.)
Typically what gets people in trouble at work is someone physically seeing the screen and going for sexual harassment. No one wants that, so most of us keep the porn at home. Universities handle porn this way, besides they do not want to monitor web traffic anyway.
I had to change my answer too, Drooler. The longer I thought about it the more I figured the Boss wouldn't ask a question like that unless he was interested in Porn himself. So, I'd gamble with giving him a "yes" without further comment! Unless he was a religious fundamentalist, of course. :-)
Drooler, I think you misread the poll. The question was: what would you do if the Boss asked you if you ever surf for porn at home. I would tell him/her that he was infringing upon my rights by asking this question. What I do at home is none of his/her business. If I knew him/her real well and we were on friendly terms I might say "yes" and move on.
If "backdoor" means anal with the girl lying on her stomach on a bed, that's HOT! Position does mean a lot in excitement for me. The common "reverse cowgirl" anal (which seems the most common these days)is far less satisfying than "backdoor", especially when the girl is flat on a bed.
Backdoor sex? That's a new term for me, but I can't figure out if it's back entry aka anal or having a guy walk through the backdoor and start doing the chick where ever... Or just something completely different.
I might even be willing to put forward that cartoon and comic porn, are in many ways a riskier types of porn. One example is lolicon. You have countless lolicon, but you'd have a very hard time getting this produced with real people, regardless that you found 18 yrs old that look like 14 or 15 yrs old girls.
Hey Drooler, that is interesting about New Sensations, at one time, probably 2005-06, that was my favorite site on the internet, and I still hadn't heard of her! I will have to go back to NS soon, price is still plenty low and see what all I missed back in 2006.
Porn.com really is a solid site, that the staff is improving almost daily. Back 4 or 5 months ago, they had one video of Aubrey Adams, who has to be the cutest, sweetest, curvy below the waist American models to come along since Kayla Marie. They had one video of her back then, and it was only a handjob one. After requesting more and complaining about the broken links, probably 25% of all links were broken at the time, I go back last month and they now have 12 Aubrey Adams videos, 11 new ones in 4 or 5 months and all broken links have been fixed that I can see and most of all, they almost have all of their movie files in that 576 high end, 2000 bitrate. I just hope they don't raise the price anytime soon. $9.95 is one of those hard to pass up prices. The only problem is the pictures with no zips. If you save them, you have to also change the name or every picture has the same name. I just started making a folder for each model that I wanted pictures of and numbered each picture when I downloaded 1.jpg, 2.jpg, into their own folder.
I had noticed that one of the members had reviewed one of their "exclusive" sites Whale Tail'N, though it isn't exclusive, they do have several of these niche sites included with membership as well. Whale Tail'N has one of my other favorite American models best scene, Micah Moore and of course, all of those focus on the thonged butt in jeans or shorts.
Hey Drooler, thanks, you nailed that one! Figuratively of course. Lucky for me, I checked porn.com where I still have a membership and they have 5 videos with Lindsey Meadows in them, including the one on Glamour Models Gone Bad that is in the preview. It is listed as XXX At Work: Secretary's Day, Scene 4 and even better besides the gyrating butt, she starts out the set in a dress outfit with black glasses like Eva Angelina's. And they have the pretty impressive quality 578 high end, 2000 bitrate version of it. Man, I wish I had a Secretary! I had never heard of her before you posted this. Thanks again.
I'm all for that one my man, all for it. I've noticed that we don't seem to be getting as many poll submissions from users any more, probably because most of the easy ones have already been done. I think it might be worth a carrot; meaning up to one raffle ticket for a poll idea. Don't know though, maybe the PU staff has a boat load of poll ideas but I sort of doubt it. You should send an email to the PU staff about that one unless Khan wants to post a reply here.
I'm in relative agreement with all you say, Drooler.
When I see anal sex, I'm reminded of the old ship board caution of Navy EM's, "after a 3 month cruise, if you drop the soap in the shower room, leave it on the floor unless you want a rude surprise."
To me the sensation of experiencing vaginal sex is so much better than the sensation of shoving my willy up a girl's ass that I really don't see the attraction as a "doer." Now for gays, of course, rear-ending is the only way to get any physical sexual gratification.
Thus the logical connection is made between a male who enjoys doing anal as being "queer."
As for group sex, I also agree. My interest in watching a porn video is the babe, not the guy(s) doing the porking. A GGB video is fine, but a GBB is usually not so good because the babe is hidden behind the two guys. I want PTA* in my porn, not dicks, scrotums and hairy asses.
> It saves bandwidth (aha! my "compression" guess was in the ballpark),
> but too much to the detriment of visual satisfaction.
Right, but there is also another side of it: it seems that most of web porn is shoot with amateur camcorders these days :-(, and progressive scan is usually not an option there :-((. Or from a bit different angle: 720p is usually about the same class/price/amount of information as 1080i, but see how much better "we have 1980x1080" looks on site web page (either camera manufacturer site or content web site) than measly "we have 1280x720" :-(.
In short - some (actually most) HD cameras now use modes like 1080i (where 'i' stands for 'interlace'), opposed to 1080p (where 'p' stands for 'progressive'). When you shoot with 1080i (or any other 'i') camera, it makes every frame out of 2 half-frames: first one consists from even 1-pixel rows, second one - from odd 1-pixel rows. But as they're made with some delay between them, fast movement can easily lead to considerable shifts between odd and even rows, and at least to my eye it looks REALLY UGLY and annoying. Obviously, the effect is the most easily seen when camera is panning (because it means that the whole picture moves quite fast).
Editing software can try to deal with it, making "deinterlace", but it has it's drawbacks (loss of detail and so on). But to make things worse, sometimes encoding process seems to re-introduce interlacing back; this I'm not really sure of, but it certainly looks sometimes, even on big non-adult company DVDs :-(.
So I'm not sure what really contributes to this unpleasant effect of interlacing (camera or encoding), but what I know for sure that I really HATE it and it spoils all the fun for me.
Interlacing is used for older TVs (CRT tubes). To achieve 30 frames per second with smooth, natural movement, they interlaced the video into 60 fields per second. The frame would draw every other line top to bottom and then every other line in the opposite direction. On progressive screens like your LCD computer monitor, interlacing becomes visible as a slight shearing effect (for lack of a better description). It's most visible in fast motion or side panning. Bottom line: it's obsolete and ruins visual quality on modern equipment.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
