| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
My problem is with sites that offer ONLY streaming video (no downloads). I loved the Orgyworld videos but they're still only available as streaming (no downloads).
|
07-14-08 06:22pm
|
Reply
227
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks for bringing back the good memories of Juli Ashton! I remember hunting in the video stores, searching for anything with her in it.
|
06-30-08 07:04am
|
Reply
228
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from moshic:
(Drooler's Reply)
i agree. however, i believe that content speaks for itself.
|
06-24-08 06:40am
|
Reply
229
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler,
You really know what you're talking about.
Best wishes,
Jay
|
06-22-08 09:24am
|
Reply
230
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
My deepest sympathy, Drooler. I've had more than my share of bad relationships and it wasn't always my fault, either. Loyalty is often unrewarded on both sides...
After being burned (really bad) the last time, I went for a year and a half avoiding relationships completely. Porn was a great relief when I was alone.
I only lucked out completely when I wasn't looking at all, I was even avoiding looking. When I met my present wife several years ago, I told her I'd go with her to an event that had been arranged by my sister-in-law, but made it very clear it "wasn't a date." I probably sounded like an ass about the no date thing, but I made it very clear I wasn't interested in a relationship.
Somehow things clicked even when I tried to avoid them.
Ironic isn't it?
However, I repeat, most of the pretty women I spent time with were an expensive and tragic waste of time.
Wait for the right person. It's better to have no one than the wrong one. If you're with the wrong one, you'll probably miss the right one.
Anyhow, my sincerest best wishes.
|
06-21-08 05:07pm
|
Reply
231
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(Drooler's Reply)
Agreed! Look at Karina from ALS Scan being 32yrs of age when shot she doesn't look like a MILF. Then I see girls on other sites being younger than 30 that already have the sexy MILF appeal.
|
06-14-08 05:24am
|
Reply
232
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
I like the thingsyoungerthanmccain.com. If you were a creationist, couldn't you list "the universe" as well?
|
06-05-08 05:27pm
|
Reply
233
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mr smut:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hahaha.. that's a good one even though it's not a joke. Speaking about the Amish I mean ;o).
I've been to the States once and I was shocked because I was the only person that walked in the streets. Where I was staying there were 2 large shopping malls only separated by one street having 4 lanes in each direction. The traffic signs where only for cars - there was no sidewalk at all!
I was wondering if the police would stop me because I didn't use a car but lucky enough they weren't interested in me. Anyhow it was a great experience and I loved the fact that I was welcome in each and every shop I visited. Hell, it was a great feeling to be taken seriously by all the shop owners or their employees. Something that is not possible to happen here in Germany.
|
05-31-08 03:33am
|
Reply
234
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(Drooler's Reply)
To me this is also a question that's not vital. As I'm a European I won't vote for this poll ;-).
America faces a lot of problems but that's true for the rest of the world as well. However wins the election should take care of questions that deal with matters like environmental pollution, unemployment, public transportation (which seems to almost not exist in most parts of the US), health insurance etc.
If I had a wish for the upcoming president of the United States it would be that this (wo)man takes lot of care of these issues!
|
05-31-08 03:08am
|
Reply
235
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
I got mad at a site I felt was pure hoax/fraud upon the user, so I choosed "Fraud" at CCBill.
Obivious they (CCBill) regard that choise as Credit Card-fraud - and in the following loooong periode NO billing service would accept that card..first and last time I picked that reason.
And you're sure right: it's not clear.
|
05-26-08 11:00am
|
Reply
236
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
The 70's porn stuff was hot for its time. I think that in the early 80's, things heated up. That's when you had adventurous directors like Cecil Howard and Alex DeRenzy start to really spread their wings. Then you had incredibly hotties like Ginger Lynn step into the fray. The quality got attrocious for a while when the shift from film to video happened - that early stuff looks absolutely like crap. In the late 80's, though, you had people like Bruce Seven start to do amazing stuff that paved the way for the best of gonzo.
I still say that if the great stuff being created today blows previous periods away. If I were in a porn theater, and a preview came on for a 70's porn flick and then some great Zero Tolerance vid with Amy Reid posing away, then sucking and fucking for all she's worth, I can guaran-damn-tee that I would be 200% more turned on by the Amy Reid vid.
I think there's a lot of nostalgia impacting the posts in this thread while the voting is a more accurate assessment of reality.
|
05-14-08 06:27pm
|
Reply
237
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey, Drooler - great input/reply!
Think I know the feeling. What I remember best was the first times I joined 1ByDay ....and WOW! - those girls made the libido work, for sure - but the video quality lacked a hell of a lot.
Still some euro-girls I had never seen before, like.....sorry, I can't remember them all - just made every thing tick...
And today: well, the overlook, the way of quickly scanning whats in there, whats good and whats not - that takes a few hours, sometimes much less.
So yes, it's a kind of another ballgame now - and, alas, there is too long between those sites where you get - just - some of the exitement from the early days...
And maybe therefore, I too do rush into a fast review onve in a while after beeing a member for a day or two (still l like the "cooling off" bit, though)
Cheers!
|
05-14-08 08:54am
|
Reply
238
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
I used to spend an awful lot of time in the adult video stores, even driving to other cities to find something new or creative. I don't miss it at all. I love the "instant gratification" of the technology generation.
|
05-13-08 06:02am
|
Reply
239
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yeh, I feel the same way. My "excitement" with a site varies depending on what I've seen lately. I'm sure I've been looking at porn for so long that some unique site will make me think it's the best thing since sliced bread until I've used it for a few weeks.
Since many of us join only for a month or two then move on to other sites and come back several months later if it looks like there's something new, maybe the best reviews would be written after at least three weeks of membership, or even after we've "moved on."
Just an idea.
|
05-12-08 09:14am
|
Reply
240
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
I agree with Drooler. There is the initial rush when even I, a weathered old porn fan from the good old pre pubic hair in Playboy days, get a charge out of some heretofore undiscovered babe on a site that seems to overflow with great stuff.
My rule is that a site that looks great and gets a bunch of good reviews goes into my favorites file on PU while I have a 5 day cooling off period. I may check out the site during the period but I won't sign up. After a week if I still have the site on my mind I'll take the plunge and sign up.
As for reviews, I don't feel that I can write an objective review unless and until I have become thoroughly familiar with a site and am willing to renew, or because it's so light in content or poorly managed that I have decided that the site is not worth renewing.
|
05-12-08 08:11am
|
Reply
241
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
It sure is good that some of these girls make something of themselves "later on".
BTW the cute Tila Nguyen: Did she ever do hc - never found it, anyway.
|
05-06-08 01:15am
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
The Chloe Jones site is CREEPY, I think I'll leave a comment.
It makes it seem as if she is alive: Visit MY store, MY friends. I think that's sleazy.
|
05-03-08 07:48am
|
Reply
243
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
It also matters who's making money off of them.
|
05-03-08 07:46am
|
Reply
244
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
When I was 10, my friend and I found my brother's secret Playboy stash! We took it to his mother (!) and asked her what to do! She said to put it back, so I guess I would return it!
|
05-02-08 05:00am
|
Reply
245
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(Drooler's Reply)
On the other hand who would be stupid enough to loose a box of high quality porn DVDs? I might return them but first of all I'd view this stuff that's for sure because having my hands on fresh porn makes me curious :-)
|
05-01-08 03:48am
|
Reply
246
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from JBDICK:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler
the reason scenes with 15 minutes of futtbuck sex are so rare is probably because the girl ends up with her face pushed into a pillow or something else that cuts off her airway and she passes out...I'm sure that's why they slap the girls, so they don't go limp, the girls that is...
interesting that they never include the shot afterwards where everyone raids the fridge and has something to eat...
|
04-29-08 02:12pm
|
Reply
247
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#26
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
I love porn names. Remember Carol Connors was named after Archie Bunker!
|
04-27-08 11:41pm
|
Reply
248
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Webmasters/girls: Read that former input from the Drooler.
You'd do yourselves a favour - and us users.
Get all the name-things together - and you'll probably get new costumers - and make everything easier for us at the same time.
And to the webmasters of places like Eurobabeindex and theNude.eu - keep up the good work...
|
04-27-08 07:07am
|
Reply
249
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from badandy400:
(Drooler's Reply)
The reason I was wondering why it posted where it did is because it did not post my reply to you under my comment about M&B, but rather it was posted under a pole question's reply section.
|
04-24-08 10:46pm
|
Reply
250
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from badandy400:
(Drooler's Reply)
Honestly i liked a lot of their pictures, I just wish I had a copy of them BEFORE the butchered them with heavy airbrushing. They air brush to the point of it looking like it was painted rather than photographed.
In a perfect world a webmaster who pulled that dirty trick of hiding fees would be shot. Fortunately, for the webmaster, it is not a perfect world. But, we can refuse to pay the fee. Using Download Them All for Firefox I believe would do the trick for downloading the photos without buying the zips. This would take a little extra time, but not too much. Certainly not $40 worth of time! This made me wish I was not a picture lover...I could have saved good money.
PS...Why the hell did this get posted in here! This post is for my comment about Mac&Bumble and the zip file fee.
|
04-24-08 05:59pm
|
