| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
Once again I find myself agreeing with you, Drooler!
|
02-03-09 07:11am
|
Reply
177
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from williamj:
(Drooler's Reply)
Smart tinking. I was thinking the same thing.
|
01-24-09 05:01pm
|
Reply
178
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
I really like the idea of resurrecting an older but popular poll. New people and new ideas can be far more interesting than a poll question that seems forced just to have a new one.
|
01-11-09 10:05am
|
Reply
179
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Exactly.
If a well written review by a PU member identifies issues with which I cannot abide, I will not sign up regardless of price or any other consideration.
If a PU review identifies features that I like, then the site will not have DRM or other negative aspects.
The only subjective element that remains will be price (I just cannot agree to spend more than $30 on any site ever. A site must be a real winner, based on the reviews if I'm willing to pop for $25-$29.99. If a site is under $25, I'll usually bite if the PU review says it's a good site.
I'll also pop for a "Full Trial" of any site if the price is $2 per day or less and the biller is CCBill or Epoch.
Download limits don't bother me because I try to be selective in what I keep. Also I'm not a big photo guy so absence of a zip isn't a big deal either. Occasionally I'll see a babe that I'd like to have a photo set for, but I won't make a go/no go decision based on that characteristic alone.
|
01-02-09 06:57pm
|
Reply
180
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#26
from pat362:
(Drooler's Reply)
There are quite a few pornstars that have tattoos, but few are those that started their carreers without them and then decided to get one or more large ones without it affecting their income. I could be wrong but didn't all the ones you name start their careers with tattoos? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I agree with you that the theory is weird, but I do think it makes sense somehow. Maybe not for every porn star, but how about Tera Patrick, Teagan, Kylie Ireland, Monique Alexander. These women all started their carrers with none or small tattoos. Now they sport some serious tattoos. I don't know if it will prevent them from getting work, but I can't help but think that it will limit the amount of work. I gather from the poll that we prefer our stars to be as normal looking as possible, and tattoos and fake breast alter that illusion.
I don't know if the girls feel as though they are forced to stay in the business, but I've read some of the stories about stars and their boyfriend/suitcase pimps.
P.S: I don't care if a porn star decides to get a tattoo. I agree with you that it's their body, and they can do what they want with it. In return if I choose not to buy a movie because said star has decided to get fake breats or a very prominent tatto then that is my choice.
|
12-22-08 06:39pm
|
Reply
181
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Ok, maybe something like those tats are taking the make-up thing or dresses or furcoats further - man, it's kind of complicated...like women themselves...
|
12-21-08 02:32pm
|
Reply
182
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from mr smut:
(Drooler's Reply)
You are speaking about Alexandra A I assume. Well this back-piece looks quite strange even though it's hard to figure out what that might really be.
I do hate fake boobies. Once there was a nice model at ALS Scan called Zoe with perfect titties and then she underwent an operation on her best assets *argh!*
Too much make-up is another turn-off to me.
|
12-21-08 03:04am
|
Reply
183
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
LOL. Might convert a lot of video lovers to a fondness for pictures! Or maybe not!
|
12-15-08 10:22am
|
Reply
184
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#57
from Pinche Kankun:
(Drooler's Reply)
IT'S TIME, CHECK IT OUT:
Homemade Uncensored - Subscription ID # 208342701000000889 Signup Date: 12/07/08 CCBILL ICQ MAIL
Little Liana - Subscription ID # 208305501000009792 Signup Date: 10/31/08 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Little Lupe - Subscription ID # 107265601000014297 Signup Date: 09/22/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Raven Riley - Subscription ID # 107241301000002418 Signup Date: 08/29/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Pacino's Adventures - Subscription ID # 108271601000039085 Signup Date: 09/27/2008 CCBILL AOL MAIL
Nubiles - Subscription ID # 108202701000003673 Signup Date: 07/20/2008 CCBILL AOL MAIL
Best Teens.com - Subscription ID # 107147701000005429 Signup Date: 05/27/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
8th Street Latinas - Subscription ID # 107147701000002410 Signup Date: 05/27/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Exploited College Girls - Subscription ID # 107131501000001937 Signup Date: 05/11/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Night Invasion - Member ID # 1267666873 Order Date: 11/22/2008 EPOCH BILLING
Manila Amateurs - Member ID # 1270044479 Order Date: 12/05/2008 EPOCH BILLING
Real Ex Girlfriends, Nasty Angels, Karup's Hometown Amateurs might have changed their provider, BUT I FIND OUT MY CANCEL ACCOUNT BILLING INFORMATION ABOUT, I JUST NEED TIME!!
I AM NOT DONE WITH THIS!!
|
12-10-08 12:23pm
|
Reply
185
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#50
from Pinche Kankun:
(Drooler's Reply)
Watch me turn this whole thing flip-side around...
WATCH ME!! >:D
Yeah, I got myself in this!! Watch me, I gonna prove how much of a fake I never was!!! >:D
|
12-09-08 07:54pm
|
Reply
186
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#49
from Tree Rodent:
(Drooler's Reply)
There'sh one rule I alwaysh have. Dooon't drink and posht at the shame time hic burble burp.....
|
12-09-08 02:41pm
|
Reply
187
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#45
from Tree Rodent:
(Drooler's Reply)
This is the advantage of being like me and never trusting anyone! You don't get screwed by people you trust, because you don't trust anyone. On the other hand it makes you a lot less nicer person. I have had to make some pretty tough judgements of character in my life, which turned out to be correct ones. I'd back my judgement of people over just about anyone else's. It makes me an arrogant son of a bitch too.
But with Pinche, you could hardly call him a plant for a website that wants to promote its product. For me, this is the worst sort of thing as far as being untrustworthy goes. He hardly seems to have an alternative agenda, he's just a loose cannon. He probably came in after too much drink, or whatever, and just decided to have a laugh - which backfired. That's how it seemed to me anyway.
|
12-09-08 09:42am
|
Reply
188
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
I think the soul searching goes on here because PUer's take their porn seriously. If you're here and you're not serious, you're going to be ignored or lambasted by the rest and you'll probably just get bored or p.o.'ed and move on. That leaves the rest of us, trying to define the PU Cultural Ethos (isn't PUCE a nice acronym) that rivals a conclave of Cardinals symposium.
|
12-07-08 01:39pm
|
Reply
189
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from mr smut:
(Drooler's Reply)
This could have been written by me. I totally agree with you Drooler!
|
12-07-08 05:49am
|
Reply
190
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#26
from Pinche Kankun:
(Drooler's Reply)
Does anybody know about the scissor attack?!!!
|
12-06-08 01:07am
|
Reply
191
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
I'm with you, doesn't matter what it is so long as the model is hot and the acting isn't cold. I think Drooler sort of summed this concept up best with his quote from the forum "A soda bottle in her twat! Now that's what I call product placement."
|
12-05-08 04:18pm
|
Reply
192
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Monahan? Who dat?
I live for posts on PU...but only while a new video is downloading or I'm cataloguing all my stash.
My plan is to have a double dry Beefeater martini, up, twist, shaken not stirred. Then yank out Little Richard, work him up to a Big Dick, watch a little vintage Christy Canyon (whose flappers, by the way, are as awesome as her hangers and should have been mentioned when we were discussing ISO standards for body parts.)
|
12-03-08 05:28pm
|
Reply
193
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from Pinche Kankun:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yeah man!! I read an entire story page on a website about how she molested as a child, her drugs addiction, how she was lied to in her marriages, how she started on the porn industry!!
You know, CRACK IS ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE HAVE FUCKED UP PORN ANYWAY!! PORN IS GETTING REALLY BORING, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN PORN SHOULD START GETTING REDICULOUS!!
There are too many cases where a woman and/or her family gets killed by the husband/boyfriend, then he kills himself!!
TOO MANY!!!
|
12-03-08 10:55am
|
Reply
194
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Agree 100%. Andie Valentino's flappers are just about the right size; great for nibbling but not grossly stretched.
Maybe we need to take Drooler's lead and create a set of ISO standards for various body parts. Holly Hollywood for erect nipples, Jenna Doll for Double D Naturals, Jana Jordan for puffy nipples, Avy Scott for areolae, etc.
|
12-02-08 05:37pm
|
Reply
195
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Pinche Kankun:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, We need more men like U, Dawg!! I seems like everytime I observe a reply or a message from you, it makes a whole lot of sense!!
FUCKING HALEY PAIGE DIED, MAN!!!!!!!!!! I DIDN'T KNOW THIS SHIT UNTIL I REQUESTED TO BE HER FRIEND ON MYSPACE!! BUT IT WASN'T HER WHO ACCEPTED ME!! SO WHO WAS IT?!!
Some crazy pyscho BDSM jerk killed her!! You see why I don't like pyschotic porn?!! It's rediculous!! Dude, she married a psychopath!!!!!!
What did he say to her to when her heart?!!! What does he look like?!!
|
11-30-08 06:09pm
|
Reply
196
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
Sorry, Drooler. :-) Careless wording on my part. True BDSM is rough stuff and if the partners were NOT equal it would have to be degrading to the one being dominated. But in most cases it is a mutually desirable thing for both partners because it caters to both the need to dominate and to be dominated, making them equal.
As I said, human sexuality is a complex matter!
|
11-30-08 03:49pm
|
Reply
197
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks, Drooler!
|
11-28-08 07:54am
|
Reply
198
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, of course it's subjective, Drooler. So let me put it a bit differently: in your opinion, which of the three top sites mentioned contains the least "figure studies" (aesthetic nudes), has none of that polished Playboy look, and encourages its models to flaunt their charms the most? :-) This is an honest question. I've never been a member of any of your big three.
|
11-27-08 06:26pm
|
Reply
199
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
These three sites keep coming up as thesites to subscribe to. As soon as I get the answer to the following question I will subscribe to one of them: which one is the "rudest" (least artsy) of the three. I am not looking for glossy, I am looking for porn. Thanks.
|
11-27-08 04:04pm
|
Reply
200
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Of course, I miss something, sometimes.
Just went back, thanks - and yes, Gina is a "doll".
But, bro - this site has so/too many faults, alas.
The "deal" for a year is ok (pricewise), but when it comes down to reality, the "deal" is not so attractive as it seems - all PUs should be aware of that....
|
11-27-08 02:26pm
|
