| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
Bigger than that - similar to Misha Online. I don't recall exact dimensions, but they were in the middle of the pack for glamour site photos.
|
07-11-09 03:39pm
|
Reply
152
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from GCode:
(Drooler's Reply)
True that lawyers are looked at as assholes mostly in the USA but they are seen as people who have accompolished something and contributed to society in general. Coming home to papa and saying you want to be the most successful lawyer will give cheers while saying you are going to be the most successful porn star; well you can pretty much guess the reaction.
|
07-01-09 12:23pm
|
Reply
153
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yeah, I had noticed the set on Mike's Apartment as well. It seems they get as many of the top Euros as any of the Euro sites do these days.
Cindy has definitely developed as a model. I have some content of her from 2005 or 2006 that is just plain boring, she doesn't "come off" as innocent, she really is innocent in those. She acts like she is scared to death.
Club Sandy pictures and the other 21st Sextury sites are still rolling out the 1280 high end pictures. They keep saying there is going to be a raise in the quality, but I haven't seen it yet. I will give them one thing though, they are bringing in some new models that are much better than the new ones the other Euro sites have. Oh and they have a new set of Cameron Cruz/Mona Lisa that just blew me away. She has cut her hair even shorter, but it is layered. Looks stunning on her.
|
06-21-09 09:48pm
|
Reply
154
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
I saw a new Cindy set recently on Club Sandy, had no idea Cindy was getting implants. They look okay if you haven't seen them yet, she looks to be a B cup now, so she didn't overdo it, but she does have two very visible scars and she is blonde in it. That surprised me even more. She kind of has a whole Christina Aguilera look in the set. The boob size difference is similar to when Sandy got her implants.
|
06-21-09 06:14am
|
Reply
155
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from badandy400:
(Drooler's Reply)
I do not have any sisters. But if I did I would love to let her hot friends borrow some. In futile hopes it would lead to something raunchy.
|
06-15-09 11:02am
|
Reply
156
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler writes: "What's with this shooting the women in so much darkness? SuperNiceGirls is especially a noctural site at any hour! WTF!"
I hadn't seen supernicegirls site before. Models look good. Main problem, besides the newness of site with small number of photos, is they can't afford to pay their electricity bill. My eyes can't see what the photos are supposed to be showing. Or maybe that's the point: tease by darkness, where you can't see the body of the model because the freaking photo is so dark. Maybe that's the new arty style, but I like to see what the girl looks like.
|
06-11-09 03:50am
|
Reply
157
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from atrapat:
(Drooler's Reply)
This wikipedia article pretty seems accurate:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluffer
Don't know what part of it is a myth. I remember some gang bang (Houston 500?) where there were fluffers on film keeping the guys ready. I also remember a fluffer character in some porn movie parodying the porn industry.
|
06-07-09 08:34am
|
Reply
158
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Agree - even the Fillmore EAST was great - once in a while I still listen to The Allman Brothers Band "At Fillmore East" (1971) and Jefferson Airplane "Bless Its Pointed Little Head" (1969) - also recorded live at Fillmore East... (and not to forget: Some Frank Zappa live came from here).
That kind of music has and will never come back....
|
06-03-09 05:49am
|
Reply
159
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from turboshaft:
(Drooler's Reply)
I am not a fan of seafood, and that's an understatement, but to each his own, especially if you thought the flavor was nice. : )
It only stands to reason that what we put into our bodies influences what comes out, right? All the times we (guys) have waxed endlessly, if never eloquently, about the diet-to-flavor relationship we have heard at least a little truth, just how much truth is anyone's guess.
The first three choices don't sound too appetizing for a flavor you might taste on a partner's most sought after parts. Chocolate sounds kind of good, but is probably too sweetened and processed to have much benefit. For me, fruits and vegetables are the only ones that naturally have a palatable flavor, or even smell, to them. Plus, with all the botanical flavors and scents added to many of the hygiene products that women buy, they must like them anyways.
|
06-01-09 03:21pm
|
Reply
160
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from turboshaft:
(Drooler's Reply)
I wish webmasters would understand that many of their members download photos to keep. I remember back in the '90s when 800 x 600 was a big photo and it took up the entire screen, or most of it. Of course, with higher res monitors being offered with better quality at lower prices, this "Why would anyone want pictures that are bigger than the screen?" argument goes out the window (or out with the smaller monitor).
I love it when material is higher quality, not simply because of better details and it shows people care about what they create, but the material can have a much longer life, even with the inevitable introduction of newer equipment. I think the "Why would anyone want more?" question is always regretted given enough time, especially with technology.
Though I do wish quite a few sites would improve photos, as well as videos (and I am not talking purely about technical aspects or either category), I would like to see some more innovation. This partially crosses over with the exclusivity choice, but I am so tired of seeing the same models on multiple sites doing pretty much the same thing, in the same settings, and often captured with the same equipment. For me this leaves the first four choices properly satisfied to the point where I hope for some creativity and unique content on the part of the webmasters and producers -- and they don't even have to risk breaking the laws or hurting some poor model's feelings to do it.
|
05-28-09 09:36pm
|
Reply
161
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler: "BTW I don't have an organization issue because I do it by model name --> source --> name of video or gallery. It's the last piece there that gets the treatment every long once in a while. Some titles just need ... help!"
I do the same. The model name gets adds at the end of the name, occasionally, such as (!!!), (.)(.) or ??? [when I think the name provided by the source is inaccurate]
The source is never altered.
The file name is where I use a touch of originality if the title from the source is not descriptive, but I try to be descriptive, not humorous...unless I can be descriptive and humorous at the same time.
|
05-23-09 12:09pm
|
Reply
162
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
Of course we're all holding our breath ... when's the last time you smelled nasty dog drool breath ;)
|
05-22-09 02:10pm
|
Reply
163
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from james4096:
(Drooler's Reply)
I agree. Certain women they don't real have to do anything to get me going.
|
04-30-09 10:37am
|
Reply
164
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
I saw somewhere that Ron Jeremy's penis already has a twitter account going. Which, when you think about it, probably has more intelligence than anything he could post.
|
04-27-09 02:15pm
|
Reply
165
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from TalonIcefire:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, I've had everything go wrong that you've listed to include the McFuckafee mess. Coincidentally, I no longer use that program. Now I reformat every drive be they internal or external before storing data. I use an internal drive for all downloads, scrub them, sanitize them, and then transfer them to whatever external I've got them designated for as well as backed up DVD discs. If it's all the same, I'd prefer to hold off on the next unforeseeable "surprise."
|
04-17-09 03:37am
|
Reply
166
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from james4096:
(Drooler's Reply)
I don't know why externals sill come formatted in FAT32. The first thing I did when I got my WD mybook was format it NTFS.
|
04-16-09 03:42am
|
Reply
167
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from atrapat:
(Drooler's Reply)
I'm not sure which it is, but there must be a reason why PU staff decided reviews and comments would expire after two years and no longer count towards site score. If that user-contributed content has lost part of its value, user points and badges earned from it should also lose part of its value.
What's more, reading what Khan said in the forum, it looks like the original idea leaned in this direction. In fact, I was half expecting to start losing points soon, since I wrote my first reviews about a year ago. This is the forum topic:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=603
When, at my current rate, I eventually get the hardcore badge around the end of 2009, after more than 18 months of reviews, I will feel like those karate black-belt 12 year old kids exotics4me mentions in his post. And I will keep it for as long as PU exists, even if I were to stop contributing after that. If the original PU idea had been in place, there's no way I could ever get the hardcore badge.
|
04-12-09 10:44am
|
Reply
168
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Once again - I totally agree with the Drooler.
Simply I do not see any point in radical changes here - I think most PUs like it as it is - just a guess, though
At the moment at lot of coorporations are into making changes - just for the sake of "change" - for no reason at all - maybe in some sort of desperation.
PU should never be desperate...and not more complicated.
BTW: The exampel with Teenrotica is just right...
SO: I like the system as it is.
|
04-12-09 09:23am
|
Reply
169
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from badandy400:
(Drooler's Reply)
I would have expected a few more votes for the single model sites to be honest. I know some of the users here like particular models and chase them down anywhere they can find them (Exotics). That is why I used Eve Angel as the example! :)
I think a lot of the single model sites popping up are people just trying to make an extra buck from home. I would imagine that most girls do not want to travel every time they need money and do a photo shoot. And with all the turnkey website programs out there anyone with half a brain can get a mediocre site running. All a girl has to do is have a friend take a few pictures and make a few masturbation videos and she believes she has a good start.
We are seeing a lot of this and people are being burned on $30 single model sites that were one week things for the girl and she dropped it and left the site running.
|
04-09-09 08:50am
|
Reply
170
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from TalonIcefire:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yet to find a flavor I don't like...
|
03-14-09 06:43am
|
Reply
171
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, Drooler, the spice of life!
|
03-13-09 05:00am
|
Reply
172
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
Oh, I like the idea of the PU board game. You get penalty cards that say you didn't read the reviews before joining a site or get sent to "PU Jail" by Khan for being a nasty poster in the forum. I assume the ultimate goal would be to amass the most points and win big raffle money and trust scores?
|
03-11-09 11:44am
|
Reply
173
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Check this link out, it is the wiki for DVD qualities including standard and HD and gives the resolutions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD
Just click on the linked "standard" in the article or "high definition" link to see the numbers.
|
03-08-09 10:40pm
|
Reply
174
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from turboshaft:
(Drooler's Reply)
It's good that you have mentioned them in reviews, but I think it goes over a lot of people's head. Quality can be a very subjective thing, and quantity -- even high quantity with low quality -- is much more objective, especially since it is often just numbers. But bit rate can really determine a video's quality, even if everyone is more concerned with the resolution or length.
Maybe there is just not enough demand by members for sites to post them, though once you download a file you can see for yourself. I worry too many sites will just use high bit rates to claim they have good videos, just like they do with HD resolutions. Just because they captured a shitty scene in HD does not keep it from being any less shitty had it been captured in SD. In fact, higher quality often only reinforces bad lightning, camera work, sound, style, etc.
|
03-07-09 05:27pm
|
Reply
175
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from kkman112:
(Drooler's Reply)
Haha, Drooler! If you ever find a vid like that, send it to me! LOL!
I don't really care either-way - it should be up to the girl and the producer. The girl should be able to decide if she wants to and the producers/directors should be able to decide if it is something that goes along with the theme of the site.
|
02-13-09 05:58am
|
