| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1276
|
Sexy Teen Paradise
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from exotics4me:
It is either the same content or we've looked at so much porn that it's all starting to look the same! I'm starting to think we need new poses, maybe the cameramen/women could take all of the pictures upside down or throw in some dwarves running around in the background?
|
02-23-08 09:09am
|
Reply
1277
|
Sexy Zdenka
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(Drooler's Reply)
It's still updating 3 photo sets per week on average although it looks like one of them is usually just magazine scans. Latest sets are being released at 2000x1333.
The galleries section of the free tour shows everything you'll find inside.
|
06-07-09 01:20pm
|
Reply
1278
|
SF Bay Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Maybe I'm getting old, and trying to be careful with my porn dollars, but I wouldn't join this site unless someone I really trusted (and likes the same kind of pix I do) wrote a glowing review of this site and gave it a high score.
The free tour of the site (with it's lack of nice-sized sample pix) is a turn-off for me.
I want to see if the models inside are really attractive, and the free tour gives very little basis for knowing what the photosets will look like.
|
12-19-08 03:01pm
|
Reply
1279
|
SF Bay Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Damn! This sounds worse and more migraine-producing than some of the old-skool vid sites that Exotic has reviewed. Even though I'm in the Bay Area and would like to support the home team, I'll be avoiding this turkey of a site like the plague.
|
12-10-08 07:20pm
|
Reply
1280
|
SF Bay Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from messmer:
It looks like the site to join, Drooler - NOT! It should be the first task of every one of our members to leave a comment by a site they belong to warning everyone of large and intrusive watermarks. There's absolutely no need for that. It's almost like finding spam in your inbox, except you paid for it. :-(
|
12-10-08 06:30pm
|
Reply
1281
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler -
Thanks for your comments.
I checked a few sets and found that sizes range from 682x1023 to 1333x2000, with a few odd sizes here and there (one sample thumb at 133x200 is included in some downloaded sets where the photos are predominately 1333x2000)
The photography is excellent, highly professional stuff.
|
03-30-08 12:22pm
|
Reply
1282
|
Showcase Eufrat
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from anyonebutme:
Short answer: do not join this website, I would score it as a "40"
Long answer:
Despite many indexes claiming this to be Eufrat's official site, it is not. She has nothing at all to do with the operation of the website other than one single weekend of photoshooting done back in early 2006. I've mentioned to those indexes that this is not her official site, but they don't care one bit.
I was a member there year & a half ago, too far in the past for an "official" review, but here goes:
All-in-all, the site contains just over 4,000 exclusive photos of Eufrat, and 18 videos that are simply recording the photoshoots.
This is how the site works, there are in total 26 exclusive photosets of anywhere from 150 to 250 photos each, which are divided up into about 100 download-able galleries. There are an additional 80 download-able galleries included which consist of 50 images randomly plucked from the 26 photosets.
From the 180 galleries I describe above, this website only gives you access to about 30 of them, and the owner does not ever rotate them. You cannot even view a single full photoset from what they provide access to.
When I was a member, there was only one page on the entire website which was not fully updated to the "new layout", and had an old link that included the necessary url variable to gain access to view & download all the photosets. I cannot guarantee this link is still there. If it is, the site *might* be worth the small price. I suspect that page has been "updated", and if so, this site is worthless.
Anyway, assuming there is access to everything, each photoset is separated into 3 to 5 zip sets, depending on the number of photos the set contains. The photos are numbered in reverse numerical order, so flipping through them sequentially you are viewing them in reverse time, each set begins with the clothes off and ends with her clothes on.
The site's "tour" also suggests you gain access into the full network of Showcase sites, but this is not true, what you get is about 10 sample galleries of the other girls, no complete photosets to view.
If anyone *still* wants to try out this site for themselves, I think I can recall which url variable needs to be changed, but I would need someone to post what the full url of one of the photo gallery pages is.
But it truly is a shame such a top model has this "official site" tied to her name.
I guess I was fine with this site only because I had full access, and know enough programming to put together a vbscript program to easily rename the files into the proper sequential order. Otherwise, there are plenty of better sites with much better photos of Eufrat.
|
12-12-09 02:26pm
|
Reply
1283
|
Showcase Eufrat
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Rick:
Hey guys,
Wanted to let you know that we did purchase some memberships yesterday for sites that had over 2 nominations. This site obviously was one of them.
What we found when signing up though was the site only accepts JCB and Discover card, neither which we have. Very unusual since I'd guess most consumers (in the US at least) don't carry either.
We'll try our best to get a pass direct from the company, but this could take some time.
The nominations have been very useful as a whole, please continue to use them! Thanks.
|
12-06-09 05:12pm
|
Reply
1284
|
Showcase Eufrat
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
How many nominations does it take? Friends at TBP - please get thing thing rollin' ....Look forward to the review.
|
12-06-09 05:21am
|
Reply
1285
|
Showcase Eufrat
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from pat362:
(Drooler's Reply)
Don't mention it. I wouldn't mind a great Eufrat site.
|
12-05-09 12:19pm
|
Reply
1286
|
Showcase Eufrat
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Piss Hunters????
Never new there was a site like that - yeah, knock them down the latter - good laugh! (still laughing....)
|
12-05-09 11:01am
|
Reply
1287
|
Showcase Eufrat
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from pat362:
I'll glady add my voice to your campaign. I think Eufrat is simply gorgeous. I hope that the preview page is just a tine section of what's available inside. If not then I think it will disapoint even the most ardous of fans.
|
12-05-09 09:34am
|
Reply
1288
|
Showcase Eufrat
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Eufrat is a lovely model, a long-time favorite of mine. She has my vote (but I've never been a member of this site).
|
12-05-09 09:20am
|
Reply
1289
|
Showcase Eufrat
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
For sure, good idea - one more at the nomination box....
|
12-05-09 07:19am
|
Reply
1290
|
Showcase Eufrat
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I think the economic downturn has really hit the porn industry. Seems like a lot of sites are either dying or no longer updating, much more than what was happening in the past.
|
08-15-09 06:59am
|
Reply
1291
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks, Drooler. More than half is good enough for me!
|
01-30-10 07:49pm
|
Reply
1292
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from ByteMaster:
(Drooler's Reply)
Ok bud, later :)
|
06-10-08 04:13am
|
Reply
1293
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from ByteMaster:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hi Drooler.
I hear what your saying. It's not that I'm complaining as such, I understand costs are rising in all areas of life. What I dont understand, and what is annoying is that the webmasters are not taking the exchange rate into account.
A guy in the US can join a site at a lower cost than I can in the UK or the rest of the EU. I suppose its all about percentages. I was looking at some site traffic using alexa.com. It seems that most porn customers are based in the US.
So, if a webmaster raises the US price he would risk losing more customers, than he would by raising the EU price. 38% of simonscans visitors come from the US, while only 11.3% come from the UK. So the sites are keeping the US price the same and taking a financial hit on every US subscription, but raising the EU price to counteract the loss.
This is the part that I find very unfair and its put me off joining a few sites today :(
Anyways, I always enjoy reading your reviews and comments :)
|
06-09-08 03:48pm
|
Reply
1294
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from DivBZero:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler - Can see where your comment hits home here.
I really quite like Simons' use of toys, but I really wish that he would organise toys of the right size and variety that ordinary girls use on a daily basis. Girls like the right size and fully strong vibration.
I'd happily lose the close-ups to see a little more expression.
And as usual I think that 3000px would be exquisite given Simon's photographics skill.
That said, I still rate the site most highly
DivBZero
|
06-12-07 03:58pm
|
Reply
1295
|
Sinful Goddesses
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from marcdc1:
Good catch thanks!
|
07-30-12 05:52am
|
Reply
1296
|
Sinful Goddesses
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from cjd2004:
(Drooler's Reply)
They don't even seem to be making new content either, just rotating it around.
|
07-14-12 07:27am
|
Reply
1297
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
66 Beauty ....thanks for that tip/update. Never been a member, but found material a looong time ago - it didn't seem like top q then - it looks better today, according to previews...
|
04-03-12 06:04am
|
Reply
1298
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from True Alex:
Well, jokes...
Shame on me, checking every single update by myself again, no trust in photographers and co-workers anymore :( I'll fire them all!
|
06-19-09 07:01am
|
Reply
1299
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from exotics4me:
Sounds like they ate the yellow snow!
|
06-19-09 05:26am
|
Reply
1300
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
I'm absolutely with you here - and I'm also sure this whole debate your review started very well could be a win-win situation for all - now I think I'll join AvErotica again, btw - AND I look forward to the development for the sites in the True Beauty Cash company.....
|
11-25-08 12:05am
|
