| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1301
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from True Alex:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well, I didn't want to discuss technical issues here but that was the photographer, that mixed up extensions of the files in some galleries. But that is my fault - I have to control everything.
Re. zip names - easy, I put it on my to do list. Thanks for the tip.
|
11-23-08 06:24am
|
Reply
1302
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
It looks like the webmaster is not happy about most cons in Droolers review. That's easy to understand.
But that the same webmaster expects PUs NOT to make a review before consulting the site - and/or the webmaster - is a little far off.
PUs does reviews of what we see on the sites - the reviews is a place for consumers.
It's fine that webmasters/siteowners react to these review, but they cannot except us to hold back til after a debate about problems/cons.
|
11-23-08 05:39am
|
Reply
1303
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from True Alex:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well, I don't post the galleries and movies manually. We are improving our scripts to avoid that flaws in the future. I'm sorry, that your impression was kind of ruined by all this glitches.
And yes, I'll post back, when we fix the problems.
|
11-23-08 05:16am
|
Reply
1304
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from True Alex:
Hello, Drooler and others!
Thanks for the review!
One thing that I don't understand is when you find an error on the site like missing pictures and you don't even try to email me as a support, but you're writing the review here. I don't mind about mentioning my mistakes in the review, but why don't let me know? I don't browse this site too often, thanks that I subscribed to PornUsers' RSS feed.
Well... back to "cons"
-Unruly thumbs: Have been greeted in some galleries, even new ones, with nothing but empty image-tag X’s, not thumb pics. “X” occasionally marks the spot in some other galleries, too.
I'll check every gallery today
-There’s also the “swollen thumb” -- a tiny fraction of the top left of a pic where the thumb should be.
The same as above
-Some clicks for enlargements expand to a full-screen “404” error page.
The same as above
-Wandering watermarks: At least one gallery had the watermark not in the bottom right where it belongs, but in some pics hovering like a drone close to the model, etc.
I will talk to Skokoff about it, would be really appreciate if you send me the links to those galleries
-Oops! I’m a visitor! Some links in the members’ area expose you to the public space. (Click “members” for re-entry with no additional login.)
My mistake, I check again everything
-Slow downloads. 30 min. for a 324MB vid. Started at 175Kbps; eased down to 139. And a 140MB vid clocked at only 105. A photoset crawled its way to me at 70.
Well, this is up to your location and location of the servers, there are no any limitations for downloading set on the servers. We should use content distribution network in the future, like Met-Art does, but we are quite small yet ;-)
-Only 14 videos. Sorry, but this is a photography site, even in motion. Flash-flash! The mood music helps a bit.
There are much more videos prepared already. All HDV, all hot :-)
So, all the cons are technical and will be solved quite soon. Skokoff is not that good in all the computers stuff that is why sometimes you find copyrights not on their place. And I couldn't check every image :-) The site is very very new and we're working on making it better.
Thanks for the review again!
|
11-23-08 04:45am
|
Reply
1305
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Toadsith:
(Drooler's Reply)
Indeed JPEG artifacts can be a villainous sort, but do not appear to be the perpetrators in this case. Still, the models are quite fetching and the photographer has a well developed style. I will certainly keep an eye on this site. Thanks for the engaging review.
|
11-23-08 02:45am
|
Reply
1306
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Toadsith:
How is the full resolution photo quality? I just went through the photo galleries section of their tour and while I like the models and the poses, I was a bit stunned by the lack of image quality in their high resolution examples. The photos had tons of digital noise and it looked like the auto focus might be a bit off. Despite seemingly nice lighting, sets and props, I'm guessing that they are using a rather low end DSLR camera. My Nikon D50 honestly shows less noise in its photos - and it retailed at around $600. Maybe they are using a low-end Canon. Are these examples relevant to their latest work?
|
11-23-08 01:44am
|
Reply
1307
|
Sleep Creep
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(Drooler's Reply)
I was sincerely upset with the theme of the site and that's why I ranked it so low. I also happen to like the "belly-down-flat" position but it doesn't appeal to me at all if the models allegedly stay unconscious throughout the scene. I strongly feel they should add some intro or epilogue to justify it. Otherwise, it's just too creepy.
|
11-22-08 04:34am
|
Reply
1308
|
Sleeping Tushy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
The system is still working though, I remember when I joined, all these 7th rate sites were listed in the top 10. So now these shills stick out like sore thumbs.
|
01-23-08 01:26pm
|
Reply
1309
|
Smooth Skinned Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from guhe:
(Drooler's Reply)
ok, deal, i'm honna join fuckedhard18, maybe you are right, i'll make a review then.....
|
11-17-09 06:08pm
|
Reply
1310
|
Smooth Skinned Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from guhe:
(Drooler's Reply)
man...just take a look at the ONLY ONE available trailer....LOL
|
09-07-09 08:25pm
|
Reply
1311
|
Smooth Skinned Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from guhe:
(Drooler's Reply)
c'mon man.... are you kidding? that's what i mean boring sites, same old shit, that site has NOT A SINGLE GAPING PUSSY ON IT, no insertions and is mostly anal site again.... SMOOTHSKINNEDANGELS AND SMOOTHSKINNEDSEX are two sites stretched PUSSY focused. oiled girls, dildos, extreme positions, 3rd guy playing with toe, etc. i mean kinky fun stuff, but with male participation, that's what make these sites so unique. but thanks for the recommendation (however i wouldn't join)
|
09-06-09 09:29pm
|
Reply
1312
|
Smooth Skinned Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from guhe:
well...you may be right about problems with login to the site, i also had them but finally it got fixed, i even got reply from the site, i guess the problem was with verotel as i got mail from them at the sign up time saying was impossible to join those sites.
from my point of view, these 2 sites are fine...exclusive content, updates, great pov gonzo action, i also think video quality is enough, videos are quite fine. .....you name a site with these ingredients which is worth to join...nowadays most of the hardcore sites are the same boring shit.
|
09-05-09 11:39pm
|
Reply
1313
|
SoCal Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Sevrin:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hmm, I've never had a pop-up at Dailymotion. I must lead a charmed life.
|
07-25-10 10:45am
|
Reply
1314
|
SoCal Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Capn:
Oh my!
Here we go again!
A so called softcore site.
Yet on the tour pages numerous toy play shots.
Cap'n. :0(
|
07-25-10 08:27am
|
Reply
1315
|
SoCal Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Sevrin:
This site has an official channel over at Dailymotion. Over there they update every day or two, so I'd imagine that it's the same at their paysite. You can find them there by doing a member search on SoCalGlamourGirls.
|
07-25-10 07:00am
|
Reply
1316
|
Spears Fever
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler,
I checked out the review you posted on the previous version of this site, thanks for the tip of it switching to this new name. I had cheated on TBP a little and read Rabbit's Review of it, it looks like they didn't carry all of the content over from the original version that you reviewed. Rabbit has the numbers as 19 pic sets, 11 videos, review date was May 2008, but Rabbit has the site listed as updating twice per week. That makes me skeptical since I'm wondering if they are just releasing the content they removed from the original version of the site as new content. Oh and the genre at Rabbit's is listed as "Fetish". So I guess it is going to be mostly these strange settings and sets that the previews show.
I think that one listed update that has her in the Blue Nike bikini is the one thing pulling me back ha ha. What a stomach and curves in that one! I just noticed that it says "65 updates and counting" I didn't understand the whole reason though for only 30 photos per update that Rabbit lists, that is a terribly small set of pictures. Thanks for the info on the original version.
|
05-21-09 12:38am
|
Reply
1317
|
Springtime Beauties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks for the update on My Precious Virgins. I'm not perfect, but I try to be generally factual in my reviews. So I wrote in the review: "Or choose the My Precious Virgins site, which has a similar photo style, and is supposed to be currently updating."
I did not know if they were currently updating, which for many smaller sites can be an on-or-off proposition, which is why I wrote the "supposed to be currently updating."
But since you were a recent member, you have the facts to back you up.
Also, a large part of my reviews are personal opinions. So even though I gave the SpringTime Beauties site a low score, someone else might find the site to be a much better value or experience.
Sometimes, when you read movie reviews by "major" film critics, you wonder if they are writing about the same movie, when they can score the same movie so differently, both high and low.
|
11-07-10 09:54am
|
Reply
1318
|
Stuffed Petite
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from DpornGuy:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey.
That's not Andy... I'm guessing the guy is either related to him or just looks kinda like him. :)
|
06-14-09 03:24pm
|
Reply
1319
|
Stuffed Petite
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
Hey Drooler
This is an old review - but nevertheless: Just joined partly because of that and because of the fine 3-days deal at the moment.
And do not regret - some very great stuff here - you might also recommend this to the "sad" messmer...
Cheers, bro!
BTW: Agree with the recommendation of FuckedHard18 - Capti Anderson among others are hust great here...
|
04-19-09 07:20am
|
Reply
1320
|
Stuffed Petite
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from DpornGuy:
(Drooler's Reply)
true. But that stud is the on that favours fuckin the girls as they lat flat..
If they got in a new guy, you probably wouldn't see that happen as often.
it's a solid idea though.
|
01-29-08 08:17pm
|
Reply
1321
|
Stuffed Petite
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from DpornGuy:
Nice review. I agree, the site only updates 2 times a month, sometimes just once... really needs to have a once a week update so it can catch up with the rest of the sites.
|
01-29-08 10:21am
|
Reply
1322
|
Stunners
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well, well, well - your're absolutly right about your doubts of exclusive stuff at Stunners...
Just spend some time browsing again - AND browsing Twistys (for one) ... and some of those fine videos I thought COULD be exclusive - they are at Twistys too (how did I miss them)
Like you say they (Stunners) do probably NOT produce any stuff themselves. Still some of the bonus-sites are ok.
|
05-19-09 05:44am
|
Reply
1323
|
Stunners
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hey Drooler
Been spending a couple of hours going through some of the content - including bonus-sites...
Guess your right about the exclusive - STILL: I never saw those three videos here with Jana Cova anywhere else (the videos where she speaks to the viewer) - been at Babelicious and Sexy Babes quite recently - but did not catch those videos..
And there are some clips with Sophia Lynn, Nikki Cane, Sandy Sweet - and even some with Charlie Laine and Capri Anderson - that I have not seen before - they all have this dirty talk - so: Have you got any idea where else those videos can be seen - in that case I'd have to skip my guess about even "some" exclusives.
Cheers bro....
|
05-18-09 05:09am
|
Reply
1324
|
Stunners
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Babelicious posts pix 5 days a week (daily except Weds & Fri) and one video clip on Weds and Fri.
SexyBabes.TV posts pix 5 days a week (Mon thru Fri) and a video clip on Saturday.
I am now a member of New Sensations and am OK with that site but not thrilled. That's really the main reason I've been reluctant to sign up with Stunners.
But if Stunners updates twice or more per day, I think I'm going to give that site a try. Their preview site is superb and if you and Denner are this positive about that site, there's no reason to wait any longer.
|
05-17-09 01:19pm
|
Reply
1325
|
Stunners
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Monahan:
Is the trial a full access trial or is it limited?
|
02-19-09 11:54am
|
